General Actions:
Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Video | Edit/Delete |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2013babyjo | 2 | Kansas Monaghan-Nelson | Russell |
| ||||
2013babyjo | 5 | Central Oklahoma Hamm-Botkin | Bricker |
| ||||
2013babyjo | 4 | UT Dallas Velasquez-Ogbuli | Kennedy |
| ||||
Kentucky | 1 | Liberty Call-Crane | Susko |
| ||||
Kentucky | 3 | Wichita State Donnell-Sullivan | Frederick |
| ||||
Kentucky | 5 | Northwestern McCarty-Pei | Weiner |
| ||||
Kentucky | 7 | Michigan State Thur-Ramesh | Revelins |
| ||||
NDT | 1 | Baylor BB | Jonathan Paul, Brett Bricker, David Heidt |
| ||||
Ndt | 3 | Concordia College Bosch-Snelling | Cook, Evans, Guha-Majumdar |
| ||||
Ndt | 6 | Berkeley Muppalla-Spurlock | Bato, Lundeen, Olney |
| ||||
Shirley | 1 | NYU DeJohn-Dellamore | Evans |
| ||||
Shirley | 1 | NYU DeJohn-Dellamore | Evans |
| ||||
Shirley | 3 | Central Oklahoma Yost-Vance | Albiniak |
| ||||
Shirley | 5 | Michigan Batra-Jacome | Guha-Majumdar |
| ||||
Texas | 1 | Baylor Montgomery-Stump | Kennedy |
| ||||
Texas | 4 | Whitman College Menzies-Barsky | Bricker |
| ||||
Texas | 6 | Oklahoma Campbell-Lee | Schultz |
| ||||
Texas | 7 | Gonzaga Bauer-Johnson | Hall |
| ||||
tournament | 3 | Puget Sound Queirolo-Brittenham | Cook |
| ||||
tournament | 5 | Texas Chowdhury-Malone | Bausch |
| ||||
tournament | 1 | Arizona State Canarie-Marcus | DiPiazza |
|
C'mon. You've entered info for 21 rounds, and only entered cites for 5? That's only 23.8%.
Open Source is NOT a replacement for good disclosure practices.
Tournament | Round | Report |
---|---|---|
2013babyjo | 2 | Opponent: Kansas Monaghan-Nelson | Judge: Russell 1AC- Space Weaponization |
2013babyjo | 5 | Opponent: Central Oklahoma Hamm-Botkin | Judge: Bricker 1AC- Release Detainees |
2013babyjo | 4 | Opponent: UT Dallas Velasquez-Ogbuli | Judge: Kennedy 1NC- Syria Politics Legalism Kritik Self-Restraint CP CMR DA |
Kentucky | 1 | Opponent: Liberty Call-Crane | Judge: Susko 1NC 2NC 1NR |
Kentucky | 3 | Opponent: Wichita State Donnell-Sullivan | Judge: Frederick 1NC 2NC |
Kentucky | 5 | Opponent: Northwestern McCarty-Pei | Judge: Weiner 1NC 2NC 1NR 2NR |
Kentucky | 7 | Opponent: Michigan State Thur-Ramesh | Judge: Revelins 1NC 2NC 2NR |
NDT | 1 | Opponent: Baylor BB | Judge: Jonathan Paul, Brett Bricker, David Heidt 1AC - AUMF |
Ndt | 6 | Opponent: Berkeley Muppalla-Spurlock | Judge: Bato, Lundeen, Olney 1AC- End War on Terror Aff |
Shirley | 1 | Opponent: NYU DeJohn-Dellamore | Judge: Evans 1NC 2NC 1NR 2NR |
Shirley | 1 | Opponent: NYU DeJohn-Dellamore | Judge: Evans 1NC 2NC 1NR 2NR |
Shirley | 3 | Opponent: Central Oklahoma Yost-Vance | Judge: Albiniak 1NC 2NC 1NR |
Shirley | 5 | Opponent: Michigan Batra-Jacome | Judge: Guha-Majumdar 1NC 2NC 1NR 2NR |
Texas | 1 | Opponent: Baylor Montgomery-Stump | Judge: Kennedy 1NC 2NC 1NR |
Texas | 4 | Opponent: Whitman College Menzies-Barsky | Judge: Bricker 1NC 2NC 1NR 2NR |
Texas | 6 | Opponent: Oklahoma Campbell-Lee | Judge: Schultz 1NC 2NC 1NR 2NR |
Texas | 7 | Opponent: Gonzaga Bauer-Johnson | Judge: Hall 1NC 2NC 1NR |
tournament | 3 | Opponent: Puget Sound Queirolo-Brittenham | Judge: Cook 1NC 2NC 1NR 2NR |
tournament | 5 | Opponent: Texas Chowdhury-Malone | Judge: Bausch 1NC 2NC 1NR 2NR |
tournament | 1 | Opponent: Arizona State Canarie-Marcus | Judge: DiPiazza 1NC 2NC 1NR 2NR |
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Entry | Date |
---|---|
1NC LegalismTournament: 2013babyjo | Round: 2 | Opponent: Kansas Monaghan-Nelson | Judge: Russell Our thesis is that these modifications to liberal legalism fail. Either they do not Legal constraints have grey holes which maintain the façade of constraint that are ineffectual – that makes trust restraints difficult The alt is to reject the aff in favor of building a culture of resilience We do not yet live under a plebiscitary presidency. In such a system, The Executive Branch of the United States should create “executive v. executive” divisions as per our Katyal evidence to promote internal separation of powers via separate and overlapping cabinet offices, mandatory review of government action by different agencies, civil-service protections for agency workers, reporting requirements to Congress, and an impartial decision-maker to resolve inter-agency conflicts. | 9/15/13 |
1NC2NCTournament: 2013babyjo | Round: 4 | Opponent: UT Dallas Velasquez-Ogbuli | Judge: Kennedy | 9/15/13 |
2NC LegalismTournament: 2013babyjo | Round: 2 | Opponent: Kansas Monaghan-Nelson | Judge: Russell ---Bad for the left--- as progressives stay focused on the law, conservatives chalk up more wins. We need to get our attention out of the law and law reviews. Our incessant fidelity to the constitutional scholarship is WORSE than doing nothing. And law is indeed a strikingly conservative and conserving set of institutions and practices. ---hold their internal links to a high threshold---individuals exaggerate claims because of tyrannaphobia 2NC Generic Link Wall (2) deference – courts defer to executive and create a rubber stamp model that would just rule in favor of the executive if they violated the law or dismiss it on procedural grounds---this is empirically true for the 3 times the executive has been sued for violating the WPR (3) national emergencies---laws are riddled with them intentionally President just needs to declare an emergency power and it gives them unlimited power---AUMF proves Presidential declarations of national emergency furnish the President with broad military and foreign affairs powers obama declared to end the war on terror and then proceeded to ramp up drones President Obama’s perpetual scam machine is in high gear – which signals another expansion of ( (7) the president can bend the light of the law---government lawyers can bend the plan to blow off the law---it’s the same reason the OLC legitimates all of the executive laws Yet, the ideological prism of presidentialism can bend the light of the law so 2NC Alternative the government has failed to sufficiently check use of force policies by the executive---public constraints produce the only true check---authority eminates from culture as presidents care about electoral votes, elections and legacy far more than legal authority Influencing political culture is more effective than legal rules---executive action is contingent on public credibility. (3) intervention is a public question not a legal one The definition of a terrorist under Homeland Security and the Patriot Act has been so | 9/15/13 |
Drones DATournament: 2013babyjo | Round: 5 | Opponent: Central Oklahoma Hamm-Botkin | Judge: Bricker Detainee protections increase the incentives for kill rather than capture Crandall 13 Carla, Law Clerk to the Honorable Carolyn Dineen King, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. J.D., J. Reuben Clark Law School, Brigham Young University. "If You Can't Beat Them, Kill Them: Complex Adaptive Systems Theory and the Rise in Targeted Killing,"Seton Hall Law Review: Vol. 43: Iss. 2, Article 3. http://erepository.law.shu.edu/shlr/vol43/iss2/3 But while these developments have been hailed as victories by civil libertarians, they have Drone strikes cause thousands of civilian deaths and do psychological violence to those who must constantly live with the threat of a strike. | 9/15/13 |
NDT - 1NC - CP - Human RightsTournament: NDT | Round: 1 | Opponent: Baylor BB | Judge: Jonathan Paul, Brett Bricker, David Heidt The CP is what their aff authors call for - they do not believe in including "militant or armed win of Al-Qaeda, Taliban or associate forces" the aff is a double turn - their advantages are self defense bad, but the aff codifies self defense against the militant wing of Al-Qaeda, Taliban, and associate forces - this legitimizes anticipatory self defense since there is no way to define who or what is an associate force. The plan is self-defense doctrine- targeted non-state actors is not consistent with norms against self-defense | 3/28/14 |
NDT - 1NC - CP - XOTournament: NDT | Round: 1 | Opponent: Baylor BB | Judge: Jonathan Paul, Brett Bricker, David Heidt -limit the authority of the president by limiting the targets of presidential indefinite and targeted killing war powers authorities to al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or those nations, organizations, or persons who enjoy close and well-established collaboration with al-Qaeda or the Taliban. -make enforcement the enforcement of the order subject to judicial review the cp solves the case | 3/28/14 |
NDT - 1NC - Case - RD 1 NDTTournament: NDT | Round: 1 | Opponent: Baylor BB | Judge: Jonathan Paul, Brett Bricker, David Heidt The executive does whatever they want now- proves no uniqueness and circumvention No bioterror impact No challenges to the AUMF YES Congress may dislike the AUMF, but they won’t agree to challenge it The precedent that has already been set means they can never resolve separation of powers because the legal norms are already codified into law and provide a defense of the executive action to get away with what they want Reject modeling claims | 3/28/14 |
NDT - 1NC - DA - PTX - Nuclear Security SummitTournament: NDT | Round: 1 | Opponent: Baylor BB | Judge: Jonathan Paul, Brett Bricker, David Heidt Plan tanks capital and derails the agenda – empirics prove Those new agreements are key to prevent nuclear terrorism – status quo is insufficient Nuclear terrorism causes global nuclear escalation – national retaliation goes global | 3/28/14 |
NDT - 1NC - K - Liberal LegalismTournament: NDT | Round: 1 | Opponent: Baylor BB | Judge: Jonathan Paul, Brett Bricker, David Heidt The impact’s a permanent war economy—the model of the Trumanite bureaucracy is empirically responsible for every policy failure and disastrous authoritarianism Our alternative is to refuse technical debates about war powers the posit legal solutions instead of political ones – this allows us to shift the frame and interrogate the methods in which we come to understand the 1ac | 3/28/14 |
NDT - 1NC - T - RestrictTournament: NDT | Round: 1 | Opponent: Baylor BB | Judge: Jonathan Paul, Brett Bricker, David Heidt Restrictions on authority are distinct from conditions | 3/28/14 |
NDT - 2NC1NR - CP - XOTournament: NDT | Round: 1 | Opponent: Baylor BB | Judge: Jonathan Paul, Brett Bricker, David Heidt Congress will use the plan to blame Obama and steal credit Fiat means that Obama loses the fight over the plan—that destroys the agenda. Severs the agent – executive imposes internal checks The president is the focal point of American politics – everyone perceives executive action Executive orders avoid politics, have the force of law, and are rarely overturned Our link is about losses and capital not popularity---critical distinction we need to present an opportunity to the plan – if we prove the cp is competitive that means their model of decision-making arbitrarily excludes certain opportunity costs which is the foundation of decision-making that is more portable This is particularly true in the context of debates about war power authority---they eliminate a core topic discussion | 3/28/14 |
NDT - 2NC1NR - DA - PTX - Nuclear Security SummitTournament: NDT | Round: 1 | Opponent: Baylor BB | Judge: Jonathan Paul, Brett Bricker, David Heidt Not top of the agenda, if there is controversy, it won’t occur for another 3 months If a congressional fight does start brewing, Obama will avoid it by passing NSA reforms unilaterally US role in 2014 agreement is key PC key – US action gets other nations on board International cooperation key – risk is existential PC key – ensures US compliance with international regimes PC key to overcome logjam – first order of business Obama push is key | 3/28/14 |
NDT - 2NC1NR - K - Liberal LegalismTournament: NDT | Round: 1 | Opponent: Baylor BB | Judge: Jonathan Paul, Brett Bricker, David Heidt AUMF = make them look good and congress first objective is to stay in congress complacency DA--- relying on the law create psychological cooption and satisfaction with what he we have done aff’s use of the law is a militaristic tactic that creates legal legitimacy to propel more frequent, more deadly violent interventions that ensure infrastructural violence that maims civilians – they actively displace moral questions in favor of a pathologically detached question of legality Now alternative solvency has to work a little different in this debate, it shouldn’t be about “who solves,” but rather who doesn’t mess things up more – neither the alt or the plan or going to “solve” a whole bunch, but they have conceded a meta-framing argument that in the context of restraining the executive, culture is the most effective means because its where authority emanates from that’s Rana and War beings with the mind – we condition ourselves to see war as the solution to every problem – our framework arguments are about shifting consciousness and the vocabulary we use to talk about problems which is far more productive (1) Public support is what drives congressional approval The aff falls to the trap of libertarian hijacking- a focus on a short-term facet like drones/detention of a broader WOT issue- the focus on single instances of legislations sap the political inertia and will to focus on the larger pars of national security legislation and actively legitimizes a system of violence | 3/28/14 |
NDT Round 3 - Abstraction KTournament: Ndt | Round: 3 | Opponent: Concordia College Bosch-Snelling | Judge: Cook, Evans, Guha-Majumdar The aff's abstraction conceals the way institutions specifically embody ideas and decontextualizes them from historical conditions. It becomes a cop out for scholars to avoid making hard choices about where and how to struggle.Sultany 13 Nimer Sultany Baldy Postdoctoral Fellow in Interdisciplinary Legal Studies, SUNY Buffalo Law School. SJD (Harvard Law School); LL.M. (University of Virginia); LL.M. (Tel Aviv University); LL.B. (College of Management) Boston University International Law Journal Summer, 2013 31 B.U. Int'l L.J. 435 SYMPOSIUM: AGAINST CONCEPTUALISM: ISLAMIC LAW, DEMOCRACY, AND CONSTITUTIONALISM IN THE AFTERMATH OF THE ARAB SPRING Polemics doesn't move past provocation and divides the debate community into camps that become convinced that only their way makes senseDixon 5 John, Department of Psychology - University of Lancaster, PINS, DEBATE BEYOND POLEMIC: REFLECTING ON REFLEXIVE RACISM, 31, 85-91 Painter's article also demonstrates for us, however, the limits of polemical writing, Alienation worsens the possibilities for solutions. It causes people to shut down Knoll 12 Kristina R. Feminist Disability Studies: Theoretical Debates, Activism, Identity Politics, 26 Coalition Building, A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington, Gender, Women, 26 Sexuality Studies Department This process of creating ways for sustaining critical and conflicted spaces can help reveal where Your DETERMINISM is TOO PARTIAL TO EXPLAIN BEHAVIORdeRoche, Dept. of Anthropology 26 Sociology @ U of Cape Breton, 2K3 According to one basic reference work in sociology, the phenomenon of "psychological reductionism Reject the aff's conceptualisms in favor of a contextualized, consequentialist-style analysis.Sultany 13 Nimer Sultany Baldy Postdoctoral Fellow in Interdisciplinary Legal Studies, SUNY Buffalo Law School. SJD (Harvard Law School); LL.M. (University of Virginia); LL.M. (Tel Aviv University); LL.B. (College of Management) Boston University International Law Journal Summer, 2013 31 B.U. Int'l L.J. 435 SYMPOSIUM: AGAINST CONCEPTUALISM: ISLAMIC LAW, DEMOCRACY, AND CONSTITUTIONALISM IN THE AFTERMATH OF THE ARAB SPRING Grounding strategies in identity is problematic because it is establish in relation to difference, to affirm one's identity requires the dominant other reinforcing the hierarchyHeyes, 12 Cressida, "Identity Politics", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2012 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.) In particular, poststructuralist challengers charge that identity politics rests on a mistaken view of Debate is like an academic conference- their claim that what they did here was transformative is only true in the most limited sense. This is tourist form of activism-scholarship that remains disconnected from the actual communities that we are trying to change. We need a reconceptualization of our work that moves beyond the academy and is more concerned with providing tools to grassroots organizations to aid their struggle against -isms.Zavala 13 Miguel, Assistant professor in the Department of Secondary Education at California State University, Fullerton "Working from my own contradictory location as a Xicano1 scholar-activist involved with grassroots organizations and as a functionary of a colonialist-capitalist State, I invoke a Raza standpoint that privileges the vantage point of colonized peoples from Latin America." By using the term Xicano I identify as a "Chicano," yet reclaim my ancestral roots to the Indigenous peoples who have lived for thousands of years in what is now the central region of Mexico. As a colonized people, Chicano claims to Indigenous identity, culture, and land have been challenged by both settlers and "Indigenous groups. What do we mean by decolonizing research strategies? Lessons from decolonizing, Indigenous research projects in New Zealand and Latin America" Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education 26 Society Vol. 2, No. 1, 2013, pp. 55-71 http://decolonization.org/index.php/des/article/view/19113/16236 The question of this debate should be larger. How can we create a politics that is sustaining? How can we create a politics that isn't just a calling out or a form of resistance – but a cultivation of ideas within larger society.We should support social transformation - not just resistance. Viola 13 (Michael, UCLA, "Hip - Hop and Critical Revolutionary Pedagogy: Blue Scholarship to Challenge "The Miseducation of the Filipino"," http://www.jceps.com/PDFs/04-2-08.pdf) Hip-hop artists often speak "in active participation in practical life" revealing | 3/28/14 |
NDT Round 3 - TTournament: Ndt | Round: 3 | Opponent: Concordia College Bosch-Snelling | Judge: Cook, Evans, Guha-Majumdar Our interpretation of debate is that the affirmative should answer the resolutional of is the enactment of a topical plan a good ideaShould denotes an expectation of enacting a plan "USFG should" means the debate is about a policy established by governmental meansEricson 3 (Jon M., Dean Emeritus of the College of Liberal Arts – California Polytechnic U., et al., The Debater's Guide, Third Edition, p. 4) The primary purpose of debate should be to improve our skills as decision-makers This also dislodges us from dogma and pre-dispositions that we have about the world- it is possible to learn and grow from the other side- it teaches us to have the willingness to be dislodged even if you are right- to say, "I understand where you are coming from" instead of polemical and dogmatic discussions which is what most of the problems politics faces today- climate deniers, the tea party, etc are not willing to hear the other side or be wrongMercier, Professor Politics UPenn, and Landemore, Professor PolSci Yale, '11 (Hugo and Helene, "Reasoning is for arguing: Understanding the successes and failures of deliberation" Political Psychology, http://sites.google.com/site/hugomercier/publications) Arguments don't hurt people, policies do and what they want to do is possible under our vision of debate by utilizing narratives, poetry and embodied knowledge to support topical action- this doesn't flatten difference but is a way to learn from itAnderson 6 Amanda Andrew W. Mellon Professor of Humanities and English at Brown University, Spring 2006, "Reply to My Critic(s)," Criticism, Vol. 48, No. 2, p. 281-290 | 3/28/14 |
NDT round 6 CaseTournament: Ndt | Round: 6 | Opponent: Berkeley Muppalla-Spurlock | Judge: Bato, Lundeen, Olney 1nc solvencyObama will fake support of the plan in order to ensure that special ops continue to kill at will. President Obama’s perpetual scam machine is in high gear – which signals another expansion of Statutory limits can’t make a dent in emergency powers. All it takes is a declaration of an emergency – and it’s emergency politics that are the primary basis for the Global War on Terror" – your aff is a just a legal fixation with things like the AUMF Thronson 13 * Patrick A., University of Michigan Law School; University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, Winter, 46 U. Mich. J.L. Reform 737 Presidential declarations of national emergency furnish the President with broad military and foreign affairs powers 1nc hegThe aff pushes the executive to covertsLorber, 13 – (Eric, J.D. Candidate, University of Pennsylvania Law School, Ph.D Candidate, Duke University, "Executive Warmaking Authority And Offensive Cyber Operations: Can Existing Legislation Successfully Constrain Presidential Power?") Stemming from similar tension noted in the constitutional division of war-making authority noted Liberal international order inevitable with or without US leadership The main alternatives to liberal order—both domestic and international—have more or less disappeared. The great liberal international era is not ending. Still, if the liberal order is not in crisis, its governance is. Yet, given the fundamental weakness of the past international orders—brought down by world wars and great economic upheavals—the challenges of reforming and renegotiating liberal world order are, if anything, welcome ones. No impact to withdrawal Another argument for high military spending is that U.S. military hegemony underlies 1nc terrorismCongressional limitations cause a shift to PMCs—-turns caseMichaels, 4 – (*Jon D. Assistant Professor of Law at the UCLA School of Law. Law Clerk to the Honorable Guido Calabresi, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit; Washington University Law Quarterly, BEYOND ACCOUNTABILITY: THE CONSTITUTIONAL, DEMOCRATIC, AND STRATEGIC PROBLEMS WITH PRIVATIZING WAR, Fall, 82 Wash. U. L. Q. 1001) But since the War Powers Resolution applies only to the deployment of U.S Turns this advantage-PMCs propagate terrorist attacks by sending the message that US companies are profiting off of the violence in the area- creates more recruitment and resentmentHalpin, 11 Alison, Graduate degree program in Outsourcing reconstruction projects to large American companies was cost ineffective and as their presence provoked Turns advantage 1 tooMICHAELS 4 *Jon D. Assistant Professor of Law at the UCLA School of Law. Law Clerk to the Honorable Guido Calabresi, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit; Washington University Law Quarterly, BEYOND ACCOUNTABILITY: THE CONSTITUTIONAL, DEMOCRATIC, AND STRATEGIC PROBLEMS WITH PRIVATIZING WAR, Fall, 82 Wash. U. L. Q. 1001 Having canvassed the constitutional, legal, and democratic harms in Parts III and IV Casecourts always defer to the executiveDriesen 9 * David M. University Professor, Syracuse University; Fordham Law Review, October, 78 Fordham L. Rev. 71 congress will not check the president, but just follow suitNzelibe 6—Jide Nzelibe, Professor of Law @ Northwestern University ~"A positive theory of the war-powers constitution," Iowa Law Review, 2006; 91(3) pg. 993-1062~ The theoretical framework laid out in this Article suggests that as long as the President PMCs aren’t subject to domestic US lawKidwell, 5 USAC, Public War, Private Fight? The United States and Private Military Companies ," http://usacac.army.mil/cac2/cgsc/carl/download/csipubs/kidwell.pdf There is also the risk that the contractors become extralegal, in effect, subject They are considered civiliansPrado, 12 Jose L. Gómez del Prado, Global Research, "The Role of Private Military and Security Companies in Modern Warfare," http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-role-of-private-military-and-security-companies-in-modern-warfare/32307 According to the interpretation of some legal experts of the International Committee of the Red | 3/29/14 |
NDT round 6 Off caseTournament: Ndt | Round: 6 | Opponent: Berkeley Muppalla-Spurlock | Judge: Bato, Lundeen, Olney 1nc tThe aff has to specify if they are a statutory or judicial restriction- they can do this by specifying their agent or specifying in the plan text.Failure to specify their agent is illegitimate and a voting issue-the resolution was written to give you flexibility of choice but you need to pick one—it’s the core of all of our groundKurr et al 13 (Jeff Kurr—Baylor University Kevin D. Kuswa, PhD—Fresno State Paul E. Mabrey III—James Madison University "Agents Wording Paper: Passive Voice, the Judiciary, and Other Odds and Ends," http://www.cedadebate.org/forum/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=4848.0;attach=1690) 1nc daNSA reforms will pass – PC keyHawkings, 3-25-’14 (David, "Hill’s Bipartisan Deadlock on Phone Records May Be Easing" Roll Call, blogs.rollcall.com/hawkings/obama-nsa-reform-plan-could-ease-congressional-deadlock-on-spying/2/) Plan tanks capital and derails the agenda – empirics proveKriner ’10 Douglas L. Kriner, assistant professor of political science at Boston University, "After the Rubicon: Congress, Presidents, and the Politics of Waging War", University of Chicago Press, Dec 1, 2010, page 68-69 NSA reforms key to credibility – absent that, they’ll lose the ability to do surveillanceSasso, 3-25-’14 (Brendan, "Why Obama and His NSA Defenders Changed Their Minds" National Journal, www.nationaljournal.com/tech/why-obama-and-his-nsa-defenders-changed-their-minds-20140325) Domestic wiretapping key to stopping terrorism – empirically successfulHewitt 8 Michael, post graduate for Honors Program at Liberty university, Wiretapping: A Necessity for Effectively Combating Terrorism in the 21st Century, http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=104026context=honors High risk of nuke terror—an attack turns multilat and makes the US hardlineVladimir Z. Dvorkin ’12 Major General (retired), doctor of technical sciences, professor, and senior fellow at the Center for International Security of the Institute of World Economy and International Relations of the Russian Academy of Sciences. The Center participates in the working group of the U.S.-Russia Initiative to Prevent Nuclear Terrorism, 9/21/12, "What Can Destroy Strategic Stability: Nuclear Terrorism is a Real Threat," belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/publication/22333/what_can_destroy_strategic_stability.html Nuclear terrorism causes global nuclear escalation – national retaliation goes globalMorgan, Professor of Foreign Studies at Hankuk University, ’9 (Dennis Ray, December, "World on fire: two scenarios of the destruction of human civilization and possible extinction of the human race" Futures, Vol 41 Issue 10, p 683-693, ScienceDirect) 1nc cpThe executive branch of the United States federal government should issue an executive order declaring it will refuse to enforce public law 107-40’s authorization to use force, effective December 31st, 2014.the cp solves the caseVermule and Posner, 7 – (Eric, The University of Chicago Law School Professor, Adrian, Harvard Law School Professor of Law, 200, The Credible Executive, 74 U. Chi. L. Rev. 865) The Madisonian system of oversight has not totally failed. Sometimes legislators overcome the temptation 1nc daThe plan shifts US doctrine to international self-defense- expanded jus ad bellum collapses global firebreak on use-of-forceBarnes, 12 — J.D. Candidate, Boston University School of Law In a world without a valid AUMF, the United States could base its continued 1nc kCongressional and judicial restraints are a paper tiger that reinforce power of the Trumanites – the network of officials responsible for national security decision-making – that jacks solvencyGlennon, 14 Michael, Professor of International Law, Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Tufts University, "National Security and Double Government," National Security and Double Government", Harvard National Security Journal / Vol. 5, pg 1-114 The first set of potential remedies aspires to tone up Madisonian muscles one by one The impact’s a permanent war economy—the model of the Trumanite bureaucracy is empirically responsible for every policy failure and disastrous authoritarianismGlennon, 14 Michael, Professor of International Law, Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Tufts University, "National Security and Double Government," National Security and Double Government", Harvard National Security Journal / Vol. 5, pg 1-114 Enough examples exist to persuade the public that the network is subject to judicial, Our alternative is to refuse technical debates about war powers the posit legal solutions instead of political ones – this allows us to shift the frame and interrogate the methods in which we come to understand the 1acRana, 11 Cornell Law (Aziz, "Who Decides on Security?", Cornell Law Faculty Working Papers, Paper 87) K 2NCThis is the critical internal link into education—restraints are meaningless absent a focus on what debate can train us as students to doYoung 13—didn’t expect this card to be read this way Lastly, debating presidential war powers is important because we the people have an important role in affecting the use of presidential war powers. As many legal scholars contend, regardless of the status of legal structures to check the presidency, an important political restrain on presidential war powers is the presence of a well-informed and educated public. As Justice Potter Stewart explains, "the only effective restraint upon executive policy and power…may lie in an enlightened citizenry – in an informed and critical public opinion which alone can protect the values of a democratic government" (http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0403_0713_ZC3.html). As a result, this is not simply an academic debate about institutions and powers that that do not affect us. As the numerous recent foreign policy scandals make clear, anyone who uses a cell-phone or the internet is potential affected by unchecked presidential war powers. Even if we agree that these powers are justified, it is important that today’s college students understand and appreciate the scope and consequences of presidential war powers, as these students’ opinions will stand as an important potential check on the presidency. complacency DA—- relying on the law create psychological cooption and satisfaction with what he we have done Technical solutions to war powers are a shell game which locks in exceptionalism their reaction is shrouded in a mythos of insecurity. The violence they recreate is a blind spot in the western mind which is exactly why we must ask prior to debate about the plan what our national security interests are who is served by those goalsWilliams 7 (Daniel, associate professor of law at Northeastern University School of Law. He received a J.D. from Harvard, "NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW." NORTHEASTERN PUBLIC LAW AND THEORY FACULTY WORKING PAPERS SERIES The concept of statutory and judicial restrictions reinforces that belief that these institutions retain real power while ensuring public deference and acceptance because the rule of law works allowing the Trumanites to maintain power without accountabilityGlennon, 14 Michael, Professor of International Law, Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Tufts University, "National Security and Double Government," National Security and Double Government", Harvard National Security Journal / Vol. 5, pg 1-114 Together these institutions comprise a "disguised republic"50 that obscures the massive shift Their scholarship is not neutral but feeds this paranoid military machine trying to objectively demarcate the world in terms of security threats – this paranoia infiltrates their scholarshipHogget, 4- The image of Prometheus has often been used as a metaphor to describe the Be skeptical of their terrorist threats- the pentagon feeds off of threats, without terrorists we would never have the large military spending that we do. We couch our fears in military security that feeds off of emotions and psychology- this drives in a state of war, a constant war machine – the war on terror, also known as the war that never endsValenzuela, 3- Without war, violence and weapons there is no Pentagon. And so to survive ====aff’s use of the law is a militaristic tactic that creates legal legitimacy to propel more frequent, more deadly violent interventions that ensure infrastructural violence that maims civilians – they actively displace moral questions in favor of a pathologically detached question of legality==== Now alternative solvency has to work a little different in this debate, it shouldn’t be about "who solves," but rather who doesn’t mess things up more – neither the alt or the plan or going to "solve" a whole bunch, but they have conceded a meta-framing argument that in the context of restraining the executive, culture is the most effective means because its where authority emanates from that’s Rana andWilliams 9 Daniel R., Associate Professor, Northeastern University School of Law, Boston, Michigan State Journal of International Law, 17 Mich. St. J. Int’l L. 493 War beings with the mind – we condition ourselves to see war as the solution to every problem – our framework arguments are about shifting consciousness and the vocabulary we use to talk about problems which is far more productiveLawrence 9 (Grant, "Military Industrial "War" Consciousness Responsible for Economic and Social Collapse," OEN—OpEdNews, March 27) A major coalition opposing executive violence is awakening – and the alt solves more than your affBranfman 9-25 -13, Fred — Director of Project Air War, interviewed the first Lao refugees brought down to Vientiane from the Plain of Jars in northern Laos, visited U.S. airbases in Thailand and South Vietnam, talking with U.S. Embassy officials, Alternet "Knowledge (of) the scale of our capability would raise public awareness generating Politics 1NRNo reforms kills the programHawkings, 3-25-’14 (David, "Hill’s Bipartisan Deadlock on Phone Records May Be Easing" Roll Call, blogs.rollcall.com/hawkings/obama-nsa-reform-plan-could-ease-congressional-deadlock-on-spying/2/) Reforms is the only way to prevent shut down of wiretapping authorizationSasso, 3-25-’14 (Brendan, "Why Obama and His NSA Defenders Changed Their Minds" National Journal, www.nationaljournal.com/tech/why-obama-and-his-nsa-defenders-changed-their-minds-20140325) A terrorist attack with WMD would end U.S. primacyKrauthammer ’3 (Charles, The National Interest, "The Unipolar Moment Revisited," Winter 2002/2003) 1nr linksThere will be opposition in the Congress- no one wants to repeal the AUMF without talking about what replaces it- creates ton of confrontation over Obama’s current war paradigm and forces Obama to defend to Congress.Knox 13Oliver, Yahoo21 News June 21, 2013, http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/congress-struggles-ending-war-afghanistan-iraq-213153386.html Enter Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff of California. Schiff, who sits on the There’s zero support for repealing the AUMF – both the military and corporations have a major incentive to ensure that relaxations of the AUMF don’t occurVVV Public Relations 13 AUMF Hunger Strike Called to Demand Repeal of 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force Congresswoman Barbara Lee (D-CA) was the only member of Congress to The rest of the executive will block Obama at every turn. The Pentagon opposes an abandonment of perpetual war and will lobby to block it. Branfman 13 Fred, Director of Project Air War, interviewed the first Lao refugees brought down to Vientiane from the Plain of Jars in northern Laos, visited U.S. airbases in Thailand and South Vietnam, talking with U.S. Embassy officials, Alternet, 6-9 Just six days before Mr. Obama’s recent speech ~30~ stating that " If the President doesn’t support it, it’s a win for Congress. The plan makes Obama’s actions look un-credible, mobilizing Congressional attacksHuq 12 + Aziz Z. Assistant Professor of Law, University of Chicago Law School. University of Chicago Law Review, Spring, 79 U. Chi. L. Rev. 777 To be sure, a persistent difficulty in debates about congressional efficacy, and with Reforms K2 NSAReforms solves surveillance credibilityWeigel, 3-25-’14 (David, "Turning Off the Vacuum Cleaner" Slate, www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2014/03/nsa_bulk_metadata_collection_rand_paul_ron_wyden_support_obama_s_plan_to.html A2 Gaucho – CIAThe fight is deescalating and Obama isn’t involvedCooper, 3-13-’14 (Ryan, theweek.com/article/index/257939/its-time-for-obama-to-take-a-side-in-the-battle-between-the-cia-and-the-senate) Obama not involved in the fightKouri, 3-15-’14 (Kim, "Obama claims he’s neutral in the Senate v. CIA battle" The Examiner, www.examiner.com/article/obama-claims-he-s-neutral-the-senate-v-cia-battle) Wiretapping Solves TerrorWiretapping solves terrorism.Hewitt 8 Michael, post graduate for Honors Program at Liberty university, Wiretapping: A Necessity for Effectively Combating Terrorism in the 21st Century, http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=104026context=honors Surveillance key to thwart attacks.Carafano 13 James Jay Carafano is Vice President for Defense and Foreign Policy Studies at The Heritage Foundation, PRISM is Essential to U.S. Security in War Against Terrorism, Aug 6, 2013, http://www.heritage.org/research/commentary/2013/8/prism-is-essential-to-us-security-in-war-against-terrorism NSA stops terrorism.Vegas Sun 13 When the NSA oversteps its authority, Aug 21, 2013, http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2013/aug/21/when-nsa-oversteps-its-authority/ Empirically prevented US attacks.Savage 13 Charlie, NYT, N.S.A. Chief Says Surveillance Has Stopped Dozens of Plots, June 18 2013, http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/19/us/politics/nsa-chief-says-surveillance-has-stopped-dozens-of-plots.html | 3/29/14 |
Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
---|---|---|---|
9/15/13 | johnvitzileos@gmailcom | ||
9/15/13 | johnvitzileos@gmailcom | ||
9/15/13 | johnvitzileos@gmailcom | ||
10/5/13 | johnvitzileos@gmailcom | ||
10/5/13 | johnvitzileos@gmailcom | ||
10/6/13 | johnvitzileos@gmailcom | ||
10/6/13 | johnvitzileos@gmailcom | ||
11/16/13 | johnvitzileos@gmailcom | ||
11/16/13 | johnvitzileos@gmailcom | ||
11/17/13 | johnvitzileos@gmailcom | ||
2/8/14 | johnvitzileos@gmailcom | ||
10/20/13 | johnvitzileos@gmailcom | ||
10/20/13 | johnvitzileos@gmailcom | ||
10/20/13 | johnvitzileos@gmailcom |
Air Force
Amherst
Appalachian State
Arizona State
Army
Augustana
Bard
Baylor
Binghamton
Boston College
Capital
CSU Long Beach
CSU Northridge
CSU Sacramento
CUNY
Cal Berkeley
Cal Lutheran
Cal Poly SLO
Case Western
Central Florida
Central Oklahoma
Chico
Clarion
Columbia
Concordia
Cornell
Dartmouth
Denver
Drexel-Swarthmore
ENMU
East Los Angeles College
Eastern Washington
Emory
Emporia
Fayetteville State
Florida
Florida Int'l
Florida State
Fordham
Fresno State
Fullerton
Gainesville State
George Mason
George Washington
Georgetown
Georgia
Georgia State
Georgia Tech
Gonzaga
Harvard
Houston
Idaho State
Illinois
Illinois State
Indiana
Iowa
Irvine/SFSU
James Madison
John Carroll
Johns Hopkins
Johnson County CC
KCKCC
Kansas
Kansas State
Kentucky
LA City College
Lakeland
Lewis-Clark State College
Liberty
Lindenwood
Los Rios
Louisville
Loyola
Macalester
Marist
Mary Washington
Mercer
Methodist
Miami FL
Miami OH
Michigan
Michigan State
Minnesota
Mission
Missouri State
NYU
Navy
New School
North Texas
Northern Iowa
Northwestern
Notre Dame
Ohio Wesleyan
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pepperdine
Piedmont
Pittsburgh
Portland State
Princeton
Puget Sound
Redlands
Richmond
Rochester
Rutgers
Samford
San Diego State
San Francisco State
Santa Clara
South Florida St Pete
Southern Methodist
Southwestern
Stanford
Texas State
Texas-Austin
Texas-Dallas
Texas-San Antonio
Texas-Tyler
Towson
Trinity
U Chicago
UCLA
UDC-CC
UMKC
UNLV
USC
Utah
Vanderbilt
Vermont
Virginia Tech
Wake Forest
Wash U (St. Louis)
Washburn
Washington
Wayne State
Weber
West Georgia
West Virginia
Western Connecticut
Whitman
Wichita State
Wisconsin Oshkosh
Wyoming