General Actions:
Wiki: opencaselist13
▼:
Document Index
»
Space: Baylor
▼:
Document Index
»
Page: Sheaff-Walmsley Neg
Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Video | Edit/Delete |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kentucky | 2 | James Madison ML | Brian Box |
| ||||
Kentucky | 3 | North Texas MQ | Dan Bagwell |
| ||||
Kentucky | 6 | Kansas BiCa | Whit Whitmore |
| ||||
Kentucky | 8 | Wichita State MR | Mike Shooter Weitz |
| ||||
UCO | 2 | Texas DS | Mike Kearney |
| ||||
UCO | 4 | UCO FH | Brian Box |
| ||||
UCO | 5 | Emporia BT | Woodward, Natalie |
| ||||
UMKC | 4 | Cal GG | Travis Cram |
| ||||
UNLV | 2 | Los Rios College PR | Jared Fanning |
| ||||
UNLV | 4 | CSU FG |
| |||||
UNLV | 6 | USC PV |
| |||||
UNLV | 8 | Weber State | D Stout |
| ||||
UNLV | Doubles | OU RY | D Stout, Joel Rollins, Katri Kaiser |
| ||||
UNT | 5 | MoStIndiana MR | Brian Box |
| ||||
UNT | 2 | KState KM | Kearney |
| ||||
UNT | 7 | Houston JJ | Sarah Topp |
| ||||
UT | 1 | Houston AlBe | Adam Abelkop |
| ||||
UT | 4 | Texas FM | JKirk |
| ||||
UTD | 2 | Houston MT | Matthew Moore |
| ||||
UTD | 4 | UCO BH | Scott Harris |
| ||||
UTD | 5 | Wichita State MO | Rao Ravi |
| ||||
UTD | 7 | KU KS | Shae Bunas |
| ||||
UTD | Doubles | Dartmouth MM | Sarah Spring, Alex Martel, Christ Stone |
| ||||
Wake Forest | 2 | WCSU AE | Jana White |
| ||||
Wake Forest | 4 | JMU BM | Martin Osborn |
| ||||
Wake Forest | 6 | UTSA CM | Arman Revelins |
| ||||
Wichita State | 2 | KU KS | Richard Tews |
| ||||
Wichita State | 3 | UTSA CR | Scott Elliot |
| ||||
Wichita State | 5 | K-State SS | Brian Box |
|
Tournament | Round | Report |
---|---|---|
Kentucky | 2 | Opponent: James Madison ML | Judge: Brian Box AFF - drone shift terror drone prolif |
Kentucky | 3 | Opponent: North Texas MQ | Judge: Dan Bagwell aff - WPR |
Kentucky | 6 | Opponent: Kansas BiCa | Judge: Whit Whitmore aff - Charming Betsy |
Kentucky | 8 | Opponent: Wichita State MR | Judge: Mike Shooter Weitz aff - feminism |
UCO | 2 | Opponent: Texas DS | Judge: Mike Kearney 1AC Drone Transparency AFF Terror Co-op Adv Drone Prolif Adv Heg Adv |
UCO | 4 | Opponent: UCO FH | Judge: Brian Box 1AC Drone Court Drone Prolif Adv Pakistan Adv |
UCO | 5 | Opponent: Emporia BT | Judge: Woodward, Natalie 1AC Immigration Securitization |
UNLV | 2 | Opponent: Los Rios College PR | Judge: Jared Fanning 1AC Undercommmons |
UNLV | 4 | Opponent: CSU FG | Judge: 1AC Cyber War adv Cyber Defens ADV |
UNLV | 6 | Opponent: USC PV | Judge: 1AC Drone Democractic Deliberation |
UNLV | 8 | Opponent: Weber State | Judge: D Stout 1AC Archaeological K of Guantanamo |
UNLV | Doubles | Opponent: OU RY | Judge: D Stout, Joel Rollins, Katri Kaiser 1AC Free Geronimo |
UNT | 5 | Opponent: MoStIndiana MR | Judge: Brian Box 1NC T Iran Politics DA XO CP Israel Pressure CP Case |
UNT | 2 | Opponent: KState KM | Judge: Kearney 1AC Zones |
UNT | 7 | Opponent: Houston JJ | Judge: Sarah Topp 1AC NFU |
UT | 1 | Opponent: Houston AlBe | Judge: Adam Abelkop 1AC Rush Limbaugh Satire Drones |
UT | 4 | Opponent: Texas FM | Judge: JKirk 1AC Humanitarian Interventionism |
UTD | 2 | Opponent: Houston MT | Judge: Matthew Moore 1NC XO CP Iran Politics T Pan K Case |
UTD | 4 | Opponent: UCO BH | Judge: Scott Harris 1NC FW Jud Cap DA Congress CP Butler K Drone Shift DA Case |
UTD | 5 | Opponent: Wichita State MO | Judge: Rao Ravi 1NC T-immediate FW Terror DA Debate Space K Wilderson Case |
UTD | 7 | Opponent: KU KS | Judge: Shae Bunas 1NC PIC Schmitt K Restrict Spec Iran Politics Case |
UTD | Doubles | Opponent: Dartmouth MM | Judge: Sarah Spring, Alex Martel, Christ Stone 1NC T Plan Flaw Iran Sanctions Polts XO CP Schmitt Case |
Wake Forest | 2 | Opponent: WCSU AE | Judge: Jana White 1AC Dance Revolution Modernity |
Wake Forest | 4 | Opponent: JMU BM | Judge: Martin Osborn 1AC Butler Vulnerability Detention AFF |
Wake Forest | 6 | Opponent: UTSA CM | Judge: Arman Revelins 1AC Libeartion Polk War Powers |
Wichita State | 2 | Opponent: KU KS | Judge: Richard Tews 1NC Flex DA Schmitt K TPP Politics Court CP Case |
Wichita State | 3 | Opponent: UTSA CR | Judge: Scott Elliot 1NC T Red Pedagogy K Case |
Wichita State | 5 | Opponent: K-State SS | Judge: Brian Box 1NC T-Sig Strikes TPA Polt Transparency CP Schmidt K Case |
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Entry | Date |
---|---|
911 Reps PIK - 1NCTournament: Kentucky | Round: 2 | Opponent: James Madison ML | Judge: Brian Box The invocation of September 11 – particularly the framing that 9/11 changed everything and so defines our current politics – turns the affirmative. It says that everything we do must respond to those actions, which is the justification for the War on Terror and current presidential war powers.Maja Zehfuss (department of politics and international studies at University of Warwick). and#34;Forget September 11.and#34; Third World Quarterly 24:3. 2003. The footage of the two planes crashing, on September 11, 2001, into Thus, Thayer and I affirm the 1AC absent its representations of September 11.As long as we believe 9/11 changed everything, we are indebted to acting always in response to that event, we can never live our own lives.Maja Zehfuss (department of politics and international studies at University of Warwick). and#34;Forget September 11.and#34; Third World Quarterly 24:3. 2003. Of course, very much in contrast to the ease with which our memory is | 10/5/13 |
AT Credibility AdvantageTournament: Kentucky | Round: 3 | Opponent: North Texas MQ | Judge: Dan Bagwell Congress has zero credibility – ruins the signalCook, Editor of The Cook Political Report, Columnist for the National Journal, 2011 Hegemony isn’t key to peaceFettweis, 11 It is perhaps worth noting that there is no evidence to support a direct relationship Heg is unsustainableLayne 10 Heg fails causes nuclear war with china. | 10/5/13 |
AT Modeling Advantage - 1NCTournament: Kentucky | Round: 2 | Opponent: James Madison ML | Judge: Brian Box Drone prolif now AND US restrictions don’t solveAnderson 10 I’ve noticed a number of posts and comments around the blogosphere on the spread of China won’t use drones to resolve territorial disputes – fears international backlash and creating a precedent for U.S. strikes in the areaErickson and Strange 5-29 Drones, able to dispatch death remotely, without human eyes on their targets or No Senkaku or Asian conflict- empirically denied, economic interdependence checks, and China avoids nationalism.Carlson ’13 At times in the past few months, China and Japan have appeared almost ready | 10/5/13 |
AT Modeling Advantage - 2NCTournament: Kentucky | Round: 2 | Opponent: James Madison ML | Judge: Brian Box Zero chance of precedent setting – other countries don’t act based on the United States policyWright 12 Naureen Shah of Columbia Law School, a guest on the show, had raised No one will follow US lead on drones – especially Russia and ChinaBoot ’11 This is a familiar trope of liberal critics who are always claiming we should forego ====No precedent setting - drone prolif is inevitable regardless of US action==== Naureen Shah of Columbia Law School, a guest on the show, had raised China is empirically cautious in its use of force to resolve territorial disputesErickson and Strange 5-29 The restrictive position that Beijing takes on sovereignty in international forums will further constrain its This is a matter of factJohn Bennett, Defense News, 5/24/13, White House Quietly Shifts Armed Drone Program from CIA to DoD, www.defensenews.com/article/20130524/DEFREG02/305240010/White-House-Quietly-Shifts-Armed-Drone-Program-from-CIA-DoD The White House has quietly shifted lead responsibility for its controversial armed drone program from DOD shift now—it’s public and credibleCorn 13 So Obama’s speech Thursday on counterterrorism policies—which follows his administration’s acknowledgment yesterday that It’s fast and certainly happeningKlaidman 13 (Daniel, The Daily Beast, and#34;Exclusive: No More Drones for CIAand#34;, Mar 19, 2013, http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/03/19/exclusive-no-more-drones-for-cia.html-http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/03/19/exclusive-no-more-drones-for-cia.html, ZBurdette) At a time when controversy over the Obama administration’s drone program seems to be cresting | 10/5/13 |
AT SOP AdvantageTournament: Kentucky | Round: 3 | Opponent: North Texas MQ | Judge: Dan Bagwell Congressional restrictions weaken president’s ability to effectively convey resolve – prevents effective negotiation and ensures conflict escalationHowell 7 Because they are legally binding, legislation and appropriations passed by¶ Congress directly impinge Spillover – Plan ensures broad weakening of executive power – collapses deterrenceMuñoz 6/4/13 President Obama’s plan to revise and ultimately repeal the 9/11-era rules Tinkering – any update to executive authority limits flexibility – invites litigation battles and conveys lack of resolveGerstein 11 The aggressively-worded White House memorandum circulated on Capitol Hill blasts a defense bill Confusion – congressional involvement creates murky lines of authority – undermines deterrenceWall 12 Congress’s failure to provide necessary interagency authorities and budget authorizations threatens our ability to prevent | 10/5/13 |
AT Solvency - 1NCTournament: Kentucky | Round: 2 | Opponent: James Madison ML | Judge: Brian Box DOD shift nowJack Goldsmith, Harvard Law School Professor, focus on national security law, presidential power, cybersecurity, and conflict of laws, Former Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal Counsel, and Special Counsel to the Department of Defense, Hoover Institution Task Force on National Security and Law, 3/20/13, No More Drones For CIA, www.lawfareblog.com/2013/03/no-more-drones-for-cia/ That is the title of Dan Klaidman’s important story:¶ Three senior U.S Obama will inevitably use drone strikes despite shiftCNN 13 Washington (CNN) — Drone strikes are a necessary evil, but one that Squo laws solve- aff only risks gutting effectivenessFriesen ’13 Last week, Politico published an article on America’s misconception of drones, and why | 10/5/13 |
AT Terror Advantage - 1NCTournament: Kentucky | Round: 2 | Opponent: James Madison ML | Judge: Brian Box Drone strikes are less utilized in the status quo, and are killing record low levels of civilians - takes out their Internal link to instabilityCahall 13 No casual relationship between drone strikes and terror recruitment in Yemen – prefer our evidence because it cites Yemini tribal leadersSwift 12 Critics argue that drone strikes create new adversaries and drive al Qaeda’s recruiting. As Alt causes to Yemeni stabilityJoseph Natividad, August 2011, Oil shock not likely and no impactYetiv ’12 Oil prices are up more than 30 percent from six months ago amid fears that Oil shocks have negligible impact on the global economyRasmussen and Roitman 2/22 Conventional wisdom has it that oil shocks are bad for oil-importing countries. | 10/5/13 |
AT WPR SolvencyTournament: Kentucky | Round: 3 | Opponent: North Texas MQ | Judge: Dan Bagwell WPR is already dead- Obama will ignore any further restrictionsLowry 11, Rich Lowry, writer for National Review Online, "Obama Kills the War Powers Act," National Review Online, June 7, 2011, http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/268973/obama-kills-war-powers-act-rich-lowry-http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/268973/obama-kills-war-powers-act-rich-lowry, FM Somewhere, Richard Nixon is smiling. In 1973, he vetoed the War Powers Obama will resist the plan - fights over war powers create intractable national diversions and destroys military decision making, interbranch cooperation and rule of lawLobel, Pittsburgh law professor, 2008 The critical difficulty with a contextual approach is its inherent ambiguity and lack of clarity Crisis pressure and information asymmetry means Congress will defer to the executivePosner et al., Chicago law professor, 2011 (Eric, The Executive Unbound, pg 7-10, ldg) Having defined our terms as far as possible, our main critical thesis is that | 10/5/13 |
Academia KTournament: Wake Forest | Round: 6 | Opponent: UTSA CM | Judge: Arman Revelins DEBATE NEUTRALIZES ANY EFFICACY OF COUNTER-HEGEMONIC STRATEGIES BY PASSIFYING RESISTANCE IN THE SIMULATION OF SOCIAL DEATH. THERE IS NO HOPE FOR OVERCOMING THE INEVITABLE CO-OPTION OF OPPOSITIONAL POLITICS IN THE CONTEXT OF DEBATE, VOTE NEGATIVE ON PRESUMPTION.Occupied UC Berkeley 2k9 THEIR SOLVENCY CLAIMS PERFORMATIVELY REDUCES SCHOLARSHIP TO POLITICAL AGENCY. THIS PRODUCES OBLIVIOUSNESS AS TO THE STRUCTURAL ANTAGONISMS WHICH CONSTITUTE ACADEMIC WORK MEANING THEIR ATTEMPTS TO TRANSCEND THE QUAGMIRE OF THEORY AND PRAXIS ARE LINKS TO OUR CRITICISM.Welsch 12 THE AFFIRMATIVE’S FRAMEWORK FOR DEBATE REDUCES SCHOLARLY REFLECTION FO POLITICAL AGENCY WHICH TRAPS ALL OF THEIR SOLVENCY AND CRITICISM CLAIMS WITHIN THE DOWNWARD SPIRAL OF ACADEMICS SPEAKING "TRUTH TO POWER".Welsch 12 | 11/17/13 |
AnthroTournament: Wake Forest | Round: 6 | Opponent: UTSA CM | Judge: Arman Revelins The 1AC ignores that racism is merely one amongst many tools of axiological anthropocentrism whereby violence can always be justified when applied to racially inferior groups. Only a critique which focuses on rejecting subhuman thinking can contest the myriad forms of racism.Deckha 2k10 ~Maneesha, faculty of law, university of Victoria, "it’s time to abandon the idea of human rights", the scavenger, dec. 10~ This species-contingent paradigm creates unending genocidal violence against forms of life deemed politically unqualified.KOCHI 26 ORDAN 2K8 ~tarik and noam, queen’s university and bar llan university, "an argument for the global suicide of humanity", vol 7. no. 4., bourderlands e-journal~ The alternative is that the judge should vote negative to REJECT THE HUMAN/ANIMAL DIVIDE. This rejection enables an understanding of the species-being. That solves the ethical contradiction of their species-level racism.HUDSON 2K4 ~Laura, The Political Animal: Species-Being and Bare Life, mediations journal, http://www.mediationsjournal.org/files/Mediations23_2_04.pdf-http://www.mediationsjournal.org/files/Mediations23_2_04.pdf~~ | 11/17/13 |
Apoc Reps KTournament: UNLV | Round: 4 | Opponent: CSU FG | Judge: Apocalyptic predictions make serial policy failure inevitableKurasawa 4 – Professor of Sociology, York University of Toronto, Fuyuki, "Cautionary Tales: The Global Culture of Prevention and the Work of Foresight", Constellations Volume 11, No 4, http://www.yorku.ca/kurasawa/Kurasawa20Articles/Constellations20Article.pdf Up to this point, I have tried to demonstrate that transnational socio-political The PARADOX OF RISK makes this issue NOT resolvable by weighing the plan. | 11/11/13 |
Authority PIKTournament: UT | Round: 1 | Opponent: Houston AlBe | Judge: Adam Abelkop This raises an interesting question. If it has been known for 100 years that | 2/13/14 |
CMR DA - 1NCTournament: Kentucky | Round: 3 | Opponent: North Texas MQ | Judge: Dan Bagwell U.S. civil-military relations are on the brink; new restrictions that go against military opinion will collapse CMRZenko 9/29 Washington has found itself in a crisis over the proper relationship between senior civilian and Congressional control over introduction of forces damages CMRYoo 2k10 I ran an op-ed today in the Wall Street Journal on the firing IMPACTS:1.RollbackOwens 13 All too often, US military officers seem to believe that if the United States 2.Bad U.S. civil-military relations cause bad interventions, gets modeled globally, turns case and causes nuclear warCohen ’00 (Eliot A.-, Prof. @ Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies 26 director of the Strategic Studies department @ Johns Hopkins, worked for Dod, taught at the U.S. Naval War College, Fall, National Interest, "Why the Gap Matters - gap between military and civilian world", http://www.24hourscholar.com/p/articles/mi_m2751/is_2000_Fall/ai_65576871/pg_4?pi=scl AGupta) | 10/5/13 |
Cap KTournament: UNLV | Round: Doubles | Opponent: OU RY | Judge: D Stout, Joel Rollins, Katri Kaiser THE AFFIRMATIVE’S CLAIM TO PERFORMATIVELY EFFECT CHANGE LOCATES AGENCY IN RHETORICAL PERFORMANCES LIKE THE PRECIOUS 1AC. THIS SHUTS DOWN MATERIALIST COALITIONAL ANTI-CAPITALIST MOVEMENTS.GUNN AND CLOUD 2K10 Text: VOTE NEGATIVE TO REJECT THE 1AC IN FAVOR OF MATERIALIST REVOLUTIONARY KNOWLEDGE PRODUCTION AGAINST CAPITALISM.AND, ECOLOGICAL CATASTROPHE NECESSITATES MATERIALIST REVOLUTIONARY DIALECTICS AGAINST CAPITALISM’S EXPLOITATION TO ENSURE SURVIVAL.Foster 2k11 | 11/11/13 |
Debt Ceiling DA - 1NCTournament: Kentucky | Round: 2 | Opponent: James Madison ML | Judge: Brian Box Obama’s pressuring the GOP with a strong display of Presidential strength and staying on message – the GOP will caveDovere, 10/1 President Barack Obama started September in an agonizing, extended display of how little sway The plan causes an inter-branch fight that derails Obama’s agendaKriner 10 Raising or Lowering Political Costs by Affecting Presidential Political Capital Shaping both real and anticipated That consumes his capital and causes a defaultLillis, 9/7 The prospect of wounding President Obama is weighing heavily on Democratic lawmakers as they decide Collapses the global economyDavidson 9-10 If the debt ceiling isn’t lifted again this fall, some serious financial decisions will | 10/5/13 |
Debt Ceiling DA - 1NRTournament: Kentucky | Round: 2 | Opponent: James Madison ML | Judge: Brian Box We control global impact uniqueness – the status quo solves their impacts but decline undermines crucial forms of restraintGriswold 5 Buried beneath the daily stories about car bombs and insurgents is an underappreciated but comforting Timeframe – the US only has till October 17th – we’re on the brink - default immediately destroys confidence and causes financial volatility throughout the economy – default to timeframe – you can only die onceCCTV 10-1 The ongoing partial federal government shutdown and fiscal uncertainties are dampening American economic recovery, Literally turns the entire aff - Congress will give Obama unfettered power in the event of an emergencyBrooks 13 AUMF or no AUMF, if the United States finds credible evidence of an imminent This is true even if they win PC theory is wrongHuq 12 Consider first a simple measure of Presidents’ ability to obtain policy change: Do they Yes passage —-1) Momentum – the shutdown created it which gives Obama the edge over the GOPKlein 9-28 House Republicans plan to attach a one-year delay of Obamacare to the continuing 2) We control the direction – their ev doesn’t assume PC – Obama won’t budge – that’s key to a dealParnes 9-30 There was no shadow of doubt at the White House as the clocked ticked down 3) Status quo gains - Obama is ahead and the GOP will cave, but PC is keyFoster 10-1 and#34;One faction, of one party, in one house of Congress, in 4) Holding the line – it gives Obama leverage over the GOPEpstein 10-1 President Barack Obama started September in an agonizing, extended display of how little sway | 10/5/13 |
Debt Ceiling DA - 1NRTournament: Kentucky | Round: 3 | Opponent: North Texas MQ | Judge: Dan Bagwell We control global impact uniqueness – the status quo solves their impacts but decline undermines crucial forms of restraintGriswold 5 Buried beneath the daily stories about car bombs and insurgents is an underappreciated but comforting Timeframe – the US only has till October 17th – we’re on the brink - default immediately destroys confidence and causes financial volatility throughout the economy – default to timeframe – you can only die onceCCTV 10-1 The ongoing partial federal government shutdown and fiscal uncertainties are dampening American economic recovery, Literally turns the entire aff - Congress will give Obama unfettered power in the event of an emergencyBrooks 13 AUMF or no AUMF, if the United States finds credible evidence of an imminent Yes collapse —-1) Business confidence – default wrecks itDavis, 9/23 However the stopgap spending bill is resolved, soon after it lurks a fiscal fight That’s key to the economyGoldmark, 9/22 Apparently our closest ally couldn’t quite figure out what they wanted to do either, 2) Stock Market – default collapses it, causing a global financial crisis – economists agreeLowrey 9-30 Come mid-October, the United States will have only 2430 billion of 3) Sectors - every key sector will implode – takes out resiliencyMcAuliff 9/18 Michael McAuliff, HuffPo, 9/18/13, Debt Limit Showdown Could Be Catastrophic For Economy: Analysts , www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/18/debt-limit-showdown_n_3950890.html The House Republican plan to have showdowns over both funding the government and raising the Their ev just says the author thinks Obama SHOULD do it – Too bad – he won’t and it would still trigger our impactsRobb 9-30 President Barack Obama does not believe he has the authority to raise the debt ceiling We have quotes from the treasury secretary directlyCNBC 10-1 The Treasury has said it has no legal authority to decide which bills to pay Decline and war are linked – default to the best studiesRoyal 10 Less intuitive is how periods of economic decline may increase the likelihood of external conflict Best international studies go negLaitman ’8 As the crisis develops, scientists are trying to predict whether a third World War Yes passage —-1) Momentum – the shutdown created it which gives Obama the edge over the GOPKlein 9-28 House Republicans plan to attach a one-year delay of Obamacare to the continuing 2) We control the direction – their ev doesn’t assume PC – Obama won’t budge – that’s key to a dealParnes 9-30 There was no shadow of doubt at the White House as the clocked ticked down 3) Status quo gains - Obama is ahead and the GOP will cave, but PC is keyFoster 10-1 "One faction, of one party, in one house of Congress, in 4) Holding the line – it gives Obama leverage over the GOPEpstein 10-1 President Barack Obama started September in an agonizing, extended display of how little sway Politics DA’s are intrinsicSaideman 11 Dan Drezner has a great post today about how the foreign policy smart set ( Framing issue - Obama has advantage over GOP nowNews Ok 10-2 President Barack Obama’s strategy during the partial shutdown of the federal government is aimed at Yes PC - strength in the current fight gives him a major political edgeO’Brien, 10/1 Nonetheless, after two-and-a-half years of standoffs and gridlock This is true even if they win PC theory is wrongHuq 12 Consider first a simple measure of Presidents’ ability to obtain policy change: Do they | 10/5/13 |
Drone Shift DATournament: UTD | Round: 4 | Opponent: UCO BH | Judge: Scott Harris Obama is prioritizing capture over drone strikes nowCorn 13 So Obama’s speech Thursday on counterterrorism policies—which follows his administration’s acknowledgment yesterday that Plan spurs a shift towards dronesChesney 11 The convergence thesis describes one manner in which law might respond to the cross- Unchecked drone usage causes great power war and hotspot escalationDowd 2013 If these geo-political consequences of remote-control war do not get ¶ | 1/5/14 |
FWTournament: Wake Forest | Round: 6 | Opponent: UTSA CM | Judge: Arman Revelins 1. Interpretation: The role of the ballot is to determine if the enactment of a topical plan is better than the status quo or a competitive option. The 1ac must read and defend the implementation of such a topical plan.2. Violation:A) "Resolved" implies a policy or legislative decision – means they must be resolved about a future federal government policyParcher 1 Pardon me if I turn to a source besides Bill. American Heritage Dictionary: Resolve: 1. To make a firm decision about. 2. To decide or express by formal vote. 3. To separate something into constiutent parts See Syns at *analyze* (emphasis in orginal) 4. Find a solution to. See Syns at *Solve* (emphasis in original) 5. To dispel: resolve a doubt. - n 1. Firmness of purpose; resolution. 2. A determination or decision. (2) The very nature of the word "resolution" makes it a question. American Heritage: A course of action determined or decided on. A formal statement of a decision, as by a legislature. (3) The resolution is obviously a question. Any other conclusion is utterly inconceivable. Why? Context. The debate community empowers a topic committee to write a topic for ALTERNATE side debating. The committee is not a random group of people coming together to "reserve" themselves about some issue. There is context - they are empowered by a community to do something. In their deliberations, the topic community attempts to craft a resolution which can be ANSWERED in either direction. They focus on issues like ground and fairness because they know the resolution will serve as the basis for debate which will be resolved by determining the policy desirablility of that resolution. That’s not only what they do, but it’s what we REQUIRE them to do. We don’t just send the topic committee somewhere to adopt their own group resolution. It’s not the end point of a resolution adopted by a body - it’s the preliminary wording of a resolution sent to others to be answered or decided upon. (4) Further context: the word resolved is used to emphasis the fact that it’s policy debate. Resolved comes from the adoption of resolutions by legislative bodies. A resolution is either adopted or it is not. It’s a question before a legislative body. Should this statement be adopted or not. (5) The very terms ’affirmative’ and ’negative’ support my view. One affirms a resolution. B) USFG is the national government in DCEncarta Online Encyclopedia, 2k "The federal government of the United States is centered in Washington DC" C) Should means there is a practical reason for actionWordNet in ’97 Should v 1 : be expected to: "Parties should be fun" 2 : expresses an emotional, practical, or other reason for doing something: "You had better put on warm clothes"; "You should call your mother-in-law"; "The State ought to repair bridges" ~syn: had better, ought~ D) Authority is the legal right to take action, power is the ability to do soForsythe and Hendrickson 96 3. Vote Negative:A) Decisionmaking - a limited topic of discussion that provides for equitable ground is key to decision-making and advocacy skillsSteinberg 26 Freeley 8 Discussion of specific policy-questions is crucial for skills development – it overcomes preconceived ideological notions and breaks out of traditional pedagogical frameworks by positing students as agents of decision-makingEsberg 26 Sagan 12 Switch-side is key - effective deliberation is crucial to the activation of personal agency and is only possible in a switch-side debate format where debaters divorce themselves from ideology to engage in political contestation – the impact is mass violenceRoberts-Miller 3 B) Dialogue – our entire negative strategy is based on the "should" question of the resolution—-there are an infinite number of reasons that the scholarship of their advocacy could be a reason to vote affirmative—- these all obviate the only predictable strategies based on topical action—-they overstretch our research burden and undermine preparedness for all debates making effective deliberation impossible which makes it impossible to be negative – voting issue for limits and ground | 11/17/13 |
Flex DA - 1NCTournament: Kentucky | Round: 2 | Opponent: James Madison ML | Judge: Brian Box Obama’s Syria maneuver has maximized presidential war powers because it’s on his termsPosner 9/3 President Obama’s surprise announcement that he will ask Congress for approval of a military attack The plan destroys causes countries to doubt the credibility of our threats – collapses security guarantees and deterrence – causes nuclear warZeisberg 4 The first significant argument of pro-Presidency insularists is that flexibility is a prime | 10/5/13 |
Give Back the Land Irony ModuleTournament: UNLV | Round: Doubles | Opponent: OU RY | Judge: D Stout, Joel Rollins, Katri Kaiser Their use of irony only makes sense when we are detatched from the material experience of deprivation. Those folks who continue to suffer and resent their suffering are seen as dupes who can’t overcome their personal biases.Karen A Foss (associate professor of speech communication at Humbolt State University) and Stephen W. Littlejohn (professor of speech communication at Humbolt State University). "The Day After: Rhetorical Vision in an Ironic Frame." Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 3. 1986. The rhetorical vision of nuclear war, however, does not fit well into any The affirmative is dependent upon a prioritization of irony and play above material struggle. The only stance is US off the planet.Kenis, 03 (Acts of Rebellion: The Ward Churchill Reader. THE NEW FACE OF LIBERATION: | 11/11/13 |
Gur-Zeev KTournament: UCO | Round: 5 | Opponent: Emporia BT | Judge: Woodward, Natalie First is the link: Giroux’s theory of dialogue and critique engages in positive utopianism and ignores how his positive model of power reproduces the control of life his critique attempts to dismantle. turns the case.Gur-Ze’ev 98 Giroux realizes and develops critical theory through schooling as a political arena with a major and the External Impact: THAT ENLIGHTENMENT MODEL OF EMANCIPATION HAS BEEN RESPONSBILE FOR PROGRAMS OF MASS EXTERMINATION, ASSIMILATION AND COLONIZATION AROUND THE GLOBE THROUGHOUT HUMAN HISTORY.Orozco-Mendoza ’8 (Elva Fabiola, thesis: "Borderlands Theory: Producing Border Epistomologies with Gloria Anzaldua, Virgina Polytechnic Institute and State University, April 24, p. 8-9. and, THERE IS NO ALTERNATIVE. INSTEAD, WE ADVOCATE AN INDIVIDUAL, PRAXIS-BASED CRITICAL PEDEGOGY of NEGATIVE UTOPIANISM.THIS MANDATES REFUSAL OF THE AFFIRMATIVE’S NAÏVE, EMANCIPATORY PHILOSOPHIES and enlightenment politics.Gur-Ze’ev 98 In his current version of critical pedagogy, Giroux emphasizes the importance of differences among | 11/12/13 |
Indefinite Detention PICTournament: UNLV | Round: 8 | Opponent: Weber State | Judge: D Stout Thayer and I affirm the 1AC as an archaeological criticism of the indefinite imprisonment war power authority of the president of the United States.The use of the term ’detained’ to describe imprisonment sanitizes the process and smoothly transforms a system of abuse and degradation into a clean administrative procedure—-this linguistic move actively legitimizes the worst excesses of the war on terrorNational Forum, 6/28/05 (http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache:3qt2cbGSm7UJ:forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp3Farticle3D3592+22detention+is22+euphemism26hl=en26gl=us26ct=clnk26cd=267) Detained is a euphemism—-it functions to legitimizes government authority—-undercuts public capacity to hold the Executive accountable for illegitimate arrestsShirazi 6 This regime of sanitized language actively conceals the horror of totalitarianism—-the language of euphemism clinically detaches people from any sense of ethical responsibilityDavidson 03 | 11/11/13 |
Iran PoliticsTournament: UTD | Round: 2 | Opponent: Houston MT | Judge: Matthew Moore Iran sanctions are at the top of the docket – Obama is spending capital to persuade Democrats to sustain a vetoLobe, 12-27 Obama’s strategy is working but failure scuttles the nuclear dealMerry 1-1 Presidential press secretary Jay Carney uttered 10 words the other day that represent a major The plan causes an inter-branch fight – saps PC and derails his agendaKriner 10 Raising or Lowering Political Costs by Affecting Presidential Political Capital Shaping both real and anticipated That causes a US-Iran war and Iranian prolifWORLD TRIBUNE 11-13 The administration has also pressured Congress to suspend plans for new sanctions legislation against Iran Iran war escalatesWhite 11 A U.S.-Iranian war would probably not be fought by the United | 1/5/14 |
Iran Politics - UNTTournament: UNT | Round: 2 | Opponent: KState KM | Judge: Kearney Presidential press secretary Jay Carney uttered 10 words the other day that represent a major Raising or Lowering Political Costs by Affecting Presidential Political Capital Shaping both real and anticipated The administration has also pressured Congress to suspend plans for new sanctions legislation against Iran A U.S.-Iranian war would probably not be fought by the United | 2/13/14 |
Israel Pressure CPTournament: UNT | Round: 5 | Opponent: MoStIndiana MR | Judge: Brian Box The United States Federal Government should engage into binding negotiations with the State of Israel and Insert Plan unless the State of Israel agrees to dismantle its nuclear arsenal and ratify the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty.Linking pressure on Israel to US posture shows that we’re serious Pressuring Israel resolves the perception of a US double standard on proliferation That’s key to global non-proliferation | 1/10/14 |
Justifications PICTournament: UT | Round: 4 | Opponent: Texas FM | Judge: JKirk | 2/13/14 |
Kentucky Round 6 - Neg v Kansas BiCaTournament: Kentucky | Round: 6 | Opponent: Kansas BiCa | Judge: Whit Whitmore 1NCDeference DADeference nowBazzle, J.D., Georgetown University Law Center, ’12 The war on terror has led to an increased use of the state secrets¶ Treaty enforcement is a political question – Supreme Court enforcement violates it kills deferrenceWu 5 (Timmy, Visiting Professor, University of Chicago, Associate Professor of Law, University of Unfortunately Treaty cases compounds the complications surrounding a regular Chevron case. Chevron deference is Non-deferential judicial review kills military readinessChensey 9 Advocates of deference at times also emphasize the collateral ¶ consequences that non-deferential Military readiness key to hegDonnelly 3 The preservation of today’s Pax Americana rests upon both actual military strength and the perception Solves escalation of global hotspots- retrenchment causes bickering internationally over leadership and prevents cooperationBrzezinski 2012 Zbigniew K. Brzezinski (CSIS counselor and trustee and cochairs the CSIS Advisory Board. He is also the Robert E. Osgood Professor of American Foreign Policy at the School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University, in Washington, D.C. He is cochair of the American Committee for Peace in the Caucasus and a member of the International Advisory Board of the Atlantic Council. He is a former chairman of the American-Ukrainian Advisory Committee. He was a member of the Policy Planning Council of the Department of State from 1966 to 1968; chairman of the Humphrey Foreign Policy Task Force in the 1968 presidential campaign; director of the Trilateral Commission from 1973 to 1976; and principal foreign policy adviser to Jimmy Carter in the 1976 presidential campaign. From 1977 to 1981, Dr. Brzezinski was national security adviser to President Jimmy Carter. In 1981, he was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom for his role in the normalization of U.S.-China relations and for his contributions to the human rights and national security policies of the United States. He was also a member of the President’s Chemical Warfare Commission (1985), the National Security Council–Defense Department Commission on Integrated Long-Term Strategy (1987–1988), and the President’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board (1987–1989). In 1988, he was cochairman of the Bush National Security Advisory Task Force, and in 2004, he was cochairman of a Council on Foreign Relations task force that issued the report Iran: Time for a New Approach. Dr. Brzezinski received a B.A. and M.A. from McGill University (1949, 1950) and Ph.D. from Harvard University (1953). He was a member of the faculties of Columbia University (1960–1989) and Harvard University (1953–1960). Dr. Brzezinski holds honorary degrees from Georgetown University, Williams College, Fordham University, College of the Holy Cross, Alliance College, the Catholic University of Lublin, Warsaw University, and Vilnius University. He is the recipient of numerous honors and awards) February 2012 "After America" http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2012/01/03/after_america?page=0,0-http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2012/01/03/after_america?page=0,0 For if America falters, the world is unlikely to be dominated by a single CSAPR DACSAPR gets upheld in the SQUO: EPA v EME Homer CityJaffe 6/25/13 On June 24, 2013, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in EPA v. Controversial decisions burn capital – justices need to pick their fights.Grosskopf and Mondak, ’98 The existence of a strong link between basic values and diffuse support does not necessarily Plan is POLITICALLY TOXIC to the entire supreme courtAlford ’12 Fourth, there is the unanticipated risk of indirect application of international law. Federal DC circuit ruling killed Clean Air act enforceabilityLane ’12 In a case with significant implications for the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Clean Independently key to solve global warming, biodiversity, mutations and extinction – key tenet of the EPA and global emission standardsMendleson and Bowes 10 This fall marks the 40th anniversary of the Clean Air Act, one of our Mutations ensure extinctionYu 9 A pandemic will kill off all humans.¶ In the past, humans have indeed Amendment CPTEXT: The United States Congress should pass and at least three-fourths of the states should ratify a constitutional amendment that eliminates Al-Bihani v. Obama as valid law, reaffirms the "Charming Besty" Canon, and states that treaties ratified by the United States are a restriction on the war powers authority of the President of the United States in the area of indefinite detention.Amendments solve better – only check on the Supreme CourtSchaffner ’05 Because the judicial branch has the ultimate authority over constitutional interpretation and construction, the Courts CPThe United States federal judiciary should affirm in opposition to Al-Bihani v. Obama, through the application of the "Charming Betsy" Canon, that treaties ratified by the United States are a restriction on the war powers authority of the President of the United States in the area of indefinite imprisonment. | 10/6/13 |
Kentucky Round 8 - Neg v Wichita State MRTournament: Kentucky | Round: 8 | Opponent: Wichita State MR | Judge: Mike Shooter Weitz 1NCT – AuthorityA. Authority is the legal right to take action, power is the ability to do soForsythe and Hendrickson 96 Statutory restrictions are limits on authority by congress FrameworkInterpretation- the aff cannot claim advantages not tied to the implementation of the planDebt Ceiling DAObama’s pressuring the GOP with a strong display of Presidential strength and staying on message – the GOP will caveDovere, 10/1 President Barack Obama started September in an agonizing, extended display of how little sway The plan causes an inter-branch fight that derails Obama’s agendaKriner 10 Raising or Lowering Political Costs by Affecting Presidential Political Capital Shaping both real and anticipated That consumes his capital and causes a defaultLillis, 9/7 The prospect of wounding President Obama is weighing heavily on Democratic lawmakers as they decide Collapses the global economyDavidson 9-10 If the debt ceiling isn’t lifted again this fall, some serious financial decisions will Collapse causes nuclear conflictsHarris and Burrows 9 Increased Potential for Global Conflict¶ Of course, the report encompasses more than economics SCOTUS CPText: The Supreme Court of the United States should rule that the War Powers Resolution is unconstitutional.CP solves – empirically courts can restrictFisher 2005 The terrorist attacks of 9/11, followed by the creation of a military Courts don’t link to politics- avoids political falloutWhittington ’05 There are some issues that politicians cannot easily handle. For individual legislators, their K of Western FeminismWestern feminism discursively constructs women as a homogenous powerless group and results in the objectification of women in the third world – this must be rejectedChandra Talpade Mohanty 1988. Associate Professor of Women’s Studies at Hamilton College, New York, and Core Faculty at the Union Institute Graduate School, Cincinnati. "Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial" Feminist Review, No. 30, Autumn. Their description of society as constituted by male and female bodies reinforces a gaze of indifference that not only causes the impacts they try to avoid but is used to justify genocideOyeronke Oyewumi. 1997, Associate Professor of Sociology, SUNY Stony Brook, The Invention of Women Making an African Sense of Western Gender Discourses, University of Minnesota Press, 1997 Their depiction of patriarchy as a monolithic force homogenizes the experience of women in the "third world" and fragments resistanceChandra Talpade Mohanty, 1988. Professor of Women’s and Gender Studies, Professor of Sociology, Cultural Foundations of Education, Dean’s Professor of the Humanities at Syracuse. "Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses." Feminist Review No. 3 (Autumn 1988)) It ought to be of some political significance at least that the term ’colonization’ has The alt is an intersectional approachWe need to recognize the multiple forms of oppressionHooper 1 Spike Peterson and Anne Sisson Runyan (1993), in their discussion of gendered dichotomies CaseEvaluate consequencesWeiss 99 Scholars and practitioners frequently employ the term "dilemma" to describe painful decision making Util is goodHarries, 94 Performance is the test. Asked directly by a Western interviewer, "In principle All lives are infinitely valuable, the only ethical option is to maximize the number savedCummisky, 96 (David, professor of philosophy at Bates, Kantian Consequentialism, p. 131) Finally, even if one grants that saving two persons with dignity cannot outweigh and No Impact -A. Root cause claims failBrian Martin, Professor of Science, Technology and Society at the University of Wollongong, ’90 In this chapter and in the six preceding chapters I have examined a number of B. War causes their impactsJoshua S. Goldstein (prof of IR @ American U, Wash D.C.) ’1 War and Gender: How Gender Shapes the War System and Vice Versa. Cambridge University Press. pp. 412 First, peace activists face a dilemma in thinking about causes of war and working Patriarchy isn’t the root cause of violence and war. There are other factors that cause war.Cynthia Cockburn 2010, Department of Sociology, The City University London, UK b Centre for the Study of Women and Gender, University of Warwick, UK (2010) ’Gender Relations as Causal in Militarization and War’, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 12: 2, 139 — 157 Second, war-fighting between two armies is only the tip of the iceberg Realism is true – they cause massive violenceMearsheimer 95 (John, Professor of Political Science at the University of Chicago, International Security, Summer) Realists believe that state behavior is largely shaped by the material structure of the international Conflating sexual difference and patriarchy ontologizes sexual difference, obscuring women’s complicity in gender violenceBibi Bakare-Yusuf, 2005. PhD Interdisciplinary Women and Gender Studies, "Beyond Determinism: The Phenomenology of African Female Existence," http://www.feministafrica.org/fa202/02-2003/bibi.html~~ No impact to militarism — intervention is self-correctingWestern and Goldstein 11 (Western is Five College Associate Professor of International Relations at Mount Holyoke College and Goldstein is Professor Emeritus of International Relations at American University, Jon and Joshua, December 2011, "Humanitarian Intervention Comes of Age Lessons From Somalia to Libya"~ No sooner had nato launched its first air strike in Libya than the mission was SolvencyObama will resist the plan - fights over war powers create intractable national diversions and destroys military decision making, interbranch cooperation and rule of lawLobel, Pittsburgh law professor, 2008 The critical difficulty with a contextual approach is its inherent ambiguity and lack of clarity Crisis pressure and information asymmetry means Congress will defer to the executivePosner et al., Chicago law professor, 2011 (Eric, The Executive Unbound, pg 7-10, ldg) Having defined our terms as far as possible, our main critical thesis is that Limitations fail during emergenciesVermeule 6 A statute could, in principle, perform such constitutional functions by aligning the various 2NCKWestern feminism inserts gender dichotomies where they were non-existent by universalizing gender relations – this promotes Western dominanceOyeronke Oyewumi. 1997, Associate Professor of Sociology, SUNY Stony Brook, The Invention of Women Making an African Sense of Western Gender Discourses, University of Minnesota Press, 1997 SolvencyThey assume Congress wants to assert themselves-they don’t.Nzelibe, Northwestern law professor, 2007 These assumptions are all questionable. As a preliminary matter, there is not much CaseTheir impacts aren’t falsifiableKeohane 98, Duke University, (Robert, " Beyond Dichotomy: Conversations Between International Relations and Feminist Theory," International Studies Quarterly Volume 42, Issue 1, pages 193–197, March 1998, http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/0020-8833.00076/pdf-http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/0020-8833.00076/pdf) Since we know that intentionality and consequences are not tightly linked in international relations Gender not root causeHillman 2004 (James, psychologist, A Terrible Love of War, pp. 86-87) To imagine war to be a "man’s thing," one more example of the 1NRCounterplan1 – Education – core topic education is not whether to restrict, but who does it – discussing implementation is keyElmore 80 The emergence of implementation as a subject for policy analysis coincides closely with the discovery 4. Moot question - The Court completely controls its agenda – it can call for any cases it wantsCordray ’04 Over the past century, the Supreme Court has gained virtually complete control over its DisadWe control global impact uniqueness – the status quo solves their impacts but decline undermines crucial forms of restraintGriswold 5 Buried beneath the daily stories about car bombs and insurgents is an underappreciated but comforting Timeframe – the US only has till October 17th – we’re on the brink - default immediately destroys confidence and causes financial volatility throughout the economy – default to timeframe – you can only die onceCCTV 10-1 The ongoing partial federal government shutdown and fiscal uncertainties are dampening American economic recovery, War and poverty lead to the suspension of all ethical principlesLeopold 04 emeritus scientist at Boyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research at Cornell ~A. Carl, currently involved with several organizations for the promotion of ethical responsibilities to the land, February 1, 2004, BioScience, No. 2, Vol. 54, p. 149, proquest~ As part of a discussion on bioethics in a changing world, we should take Turns case —-Literally turns the entire aff - Congress will give Obama unfettered power in the event of an emergencyBrooks 13 AUMF or no AUMF, if the United States finds credible evidence of an imminent Any modification to the WPR is a lightning rodCCR 9 Secondly, the War Powers Resolution correctly recognized that even congressional silence, inaction or Framing issue - Obama has advantage over GOP nowNews Ok 10-2 President Barack Obama’s strategy during the partial shutdown of the federal government is aimed at Yes PC - strength in the current fight gives him a major political edgeO’Brien, 10/1 Nonetheless, after two-and-a-half years of standoffs and gridlock Shutdown won’t break the fever—deal is keyJonathan Bernstein, Political Scientist, WaPo Columnist, 9/17/13, "Break the Fever" Is Futile — Especially For Boehner , plainblogaboutpolitics.blogspot.com/2013/09/break-fever-is-futile-especially-for.html This is in response to Noam Scheiber, who thinks that it makes sense for Decline and war are linked – default to the best studiesRoyal 10 Less intuitive is how periods of economic decline may increase the likelihood of external conflict Best international studies go negLaitman ’8 As the crisis develops, scientists are trying to predict whether a third World War This time is differentCapehart 9-30 Let me interrupt the fear over the looming government shutdown to convince you that if Will get done – but will be a fight – don’t assume uniqueness overwhelmsGarcia 9-26 To the seasoned finance blogger, US Congressional asshattery lacks the terrifying intrigue it had The democratic vote can be derailedDickerson 9-30 Here the president’s interests and the interests of Senate Democrats could split in a way | 10/6/13 |
Pan KTournament: UTD | Round: 2 | Opponent: Houston MT | Judge: Matthew Moore Their thesis of a rising China is a racist construction of the non-western otherPan 4 These are some of the questions in the minds of Western/American strategic analysts That creates a self-fufilling prophecy Methodologically, the "China threat" is a hypothesis about¶ the future. Alternative: Vote negative to embrace the affirmative without the China Threat ThesisHoffmann 2k12 The transformation of China in the last thirty years has changed the world, and | 1/5/14 |
Pic out of TrialsTournament: Wake Forest | Round: 4 | Opponent: JMU BM | Judge: Martin Osborn The United States Congress should substantially increase statutory restrictions on the war powers authority of the President of the United States by requiring that persons detained be released.The counterplan is definitively competitive: we PIC out of the offer of civilian trials. This makes it both textually and functionally competitive.The US court system is racist at every step of the way. Evidence collection, jury selection, the trial system itself – all of these components of the legal system are steeped in racism. Putting prisoners through the trial system will NOT lead to reform – we need massive jarring shocks to the system which only the counterplan can solve.Quigley 2010 (Bill, Legal Director @ Center for Constitutional Rights and Professor at Loyola New Orleans. "Fourteen Examples of Racism in Criminal Justice System" http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bill-quigley/fourteen-examples-of-raci_b_658947.html) The executive will redefine the law to get around the planPollack 13 | 11/16/13 |
PlanPlanTournament: UCO | Round: 5 | Opponent: Emporia BT | Judge: Woodward, Natalie We must seek to understand imprisonment as a practice of social ordering that creates the conditions for US domination to existDylan Rodriguez, Professer University of California Riverside, November 2007 To consider the U.S. prison as a global practice of dominance, We believe the American prison system, the logic of imprisonment, and its domestic support for neocolonial fascism, especially about issues related to immigration, should be abolished.And, our advocacy should be understood as part of an intellectual struggle against the racialized practices that justify colonialism, imperialism, and fascism, and allow for the existence of the prison system.NIKHIL SINGH 2006, The philosopher Giorgio Agamben has most fully recognized and elucidated the relationship between the production Dehumanized thought at the root of the imprisonment mentality and the prison system results in impacts beyond calculation, outweighing anything the aff can claimBerube 1997—Professor of communication at the University of Carolina, Director of Public Communication of Science and Technology, NSCU, David Berube "Nanotechnological Prolongevity: The Down Side" June-July Unfortunately, societal views of human utility are fleeting. Cultural values are simply unfixed | 11/12/13 |
PlanPlan VS WCSU AE ModernityTournament: Wake Forest | Round: 2 | Opponent: WCSU AE | Judge: Jana White We must seek to understand imprisonment as a practice of social ordering that creates the conditions for US domination to existDylan Rodriguez, Professer University of California Riverside, November 2007 To consider the U.S. prison as a global practice of dominance, We believe the American prison system, the logic of imprisonment, and its domestic support for neocolonial fascism, especially about issues related to immigration, should be abolished.Challenging the prison industrial complex can constellate struggles against all of modernity.Rodriguez ’8 The¶ vast bulk¶ of¶ my¶ organizing¶ work¶ has¶ And, our advocacy should be understood as part of an intellectual struggle against the racialized practices that justify colonialism, imperialism, and fascism, and allow for the existence of the prison system.NIKHIL SINGH 2006, The philosopher Giorgio Agamben has most fully recognized and elucidated the relationship between the production Dehumanized thought at the root of the imprisonment mentality and the prison system results in impacts beyond calculation, outweighing anything the aff can claimBerube 1997—Professor of communication at the University of Carolina, Director of Public Communication of Science and Technology, NSCU, David Berube "Nanotechnological Prolongevity: The Down Side" June-July Unfortunately, societal views of human utility are fleeting. Cultural values are simply unfixed | 11/16/13 |
Resolution CP - 1NCTournament: Kentucky | Round: 3 | Opponent: North Texas MQ | Judge: Dan Bagwell The United States Federal Government should pass a concurrent Congressional resolution expressing Congressional support for restricting the President’s war powers authority for the introduction of United States armed forces without prior Congressional authorization, including but not limited to statutory mechanisms, and expressing the intent to remove funding if the executive continues to introduce United States armed forces without prior Congressional authorization.It competes – it’s non-statutorySwaine, 10 Furthermore, Justice Jackson’s framework also suggested that congressional will could be expressed non- The CP changes the allocation of authority without enforcing legal restrictionsGersen and Posner, 8 Soft statutes can also play an important role in the allocation of authority between Congress It avoids politicsHarvard Law Review, 11 If Congress wishes to resolve a statutory ambiguity, it always has the option of | 10/5/13 |
Resolution CP - 2NCTournament: Kentucky | Round: 3 | Opponent: North Texas MQ | Judge: Dan Bagwell 3) Voluntary compliance - the CP induces it to forestall the threat of binding restrictionsGersen and Posner, 8 II. How Does Soft Law Affect Behavior? We propose two main theories for 4) Err neg – no conceptual difference between legal rules and non-binding rules because the executive ignores and re-interprets statutes. Everything that effects the President is political – and the CP has the same political influence.Posner and Vermeule, 10 CONCLUSION¶ American government in the period 2001 to 2008 bears little resemblance to the 5) Political climate – CP creates a political climate that causes the plan down the roadHarvard Law Review, 11 Why a Congressional Resolution Deserves Deference Even for Agency-Administered Statutes As explained in 6) Credible signals - statutory restrictions involve institutional bargaining between Congress and the President. The CP avoids this and sends more credible signals in authority disputes- Also means its solves SOP because the President wouldn’t get involved to shape the policy Information about legislative preferences. Soft statutes can be better indicators of legislative intent than 3) Tradeoff - statutory enactment costs consume docket time, energy and capital and tradeoff with the agendaHarvard Law Review, 11 One impediment to this outcome is that the costs of legislative enactment are frequently too 4) Bipartisan - Soft law constraints are bipartisan and avoid the formal legislative processBradley and Morrison, 12
In addition, Congress has a variety of "soft law" tools for monitoring 5) Involvement - soft law doesn’t require presidential involvement – it captures the signaling effects at a lower political costGersen and Posner, 8 C. Soft Law Versus Hard Law: Costs and Benefits There are two main | 10/5/13 |
Restrict SpecTournament: UTD | Round: 7 | Opponent: KU KS | Judge: Shae Bunas A. Our interpretation is that the aff must specify judicial or statutory restrictions.B. Violation: The aff doesn’t do thatC. Standards
2. Topic Education – One of the main questions of the resolution is whether the courts of congress should institute restrictions – they rob us of that debate 3. No specification in the 2AC, already destroyed 1NC strategy, making it a voting issue is the only way to resolve our impacts, everything else is a post-hoc remedy. | 1/6/14 |
Russia BiLat CPTournament: UNT | Round: 7 | Opponent: Houston JJ | Judge: Sarah Topp Formal negotiations mean Russia says yes – they want reductions, but want them on paper Failure to engage Russia leads to backlash and turns case | 2/13/14 |
Schmitt K - 1NCTournament: Kentucky | Round: 3 | Opponent: North Texas MQ | Judge: Dan Bagwell Restrictions on executive war powers DO NOTHING for the state of political legal exception we live in and only gives further justification for violent intervention on the basis of legalityDyzenhaus 05 (David, is a professor of Law and Philosophy at the University of Toronto, and a Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada, "Schmitt v. Dicey: Are States of Emergency Inside or Outside the Legal Order?" Cardozo Law Review 27) Rossiter had in mind Lincoln’s actions during the Civil War, including the proclamation by The alternative is to refuse to check the executive. Unchecked authority of the executive is necessary to respond to the exception.Nagan and Haddad 12 (Winston and Aitza, "Sovereignty in Theory and Practice." San Diego International Law Journal 13) Although Schmitt was German, his ideas about sovereignty, and the political exception have | 10/5/13 |
Schmitt K - 2NCTournament: Kentucky | Round: 3 | Opponent: North Texas MQ | Judge: Dan Bagwell SUBPOINT A – Univeralism effaces the us/them distinction to form a unified whole. This lack of distinctions causes global, genocidal war BECAUSE OF lashoutReinhard 2k4 If the concept of the political is defined, as Carl Schmitt does, in And this results in extinction.Schmitt ’63 (Carl. The Theory of the Partisan: A Commentary/Remark on the Theory of the Political. Trans. A. C. Goodson. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press, 2004. 67.) This means concretely that the supra-conventional weapon supposes¶ the supra-conventional The affirmative purports to stand against war, but they do so in the name of humanity, security, rights and justice - They betray a universalism which can only result in imperialism and more war, turning the aff.Rasch 2000 (William. "Conflict as a Vocation: Carl Schmitt and the Possibility of Politics." Theory Culture Society 17.1) Schmitt would recognize these as the right questions to ask, would recognize them, Legal standards are always shiftable and shifting, especially where they relate to war powers. They only transform a black hole into a gray hole.Vermeule ’09 (Adrian, February, "Our Schmittian Administrative Law." Harvard Law Review 122) 4. Standards Versus Grey Holes. - A particular clarification about grey holes is 4. PERM IMPOSSIBLE- we must choose between universalization of values or recognition of enmity.Moreiras 04 ~Director of European Studies at Duke, Alberto, "A God without Sovereignty. Political Jouissance. The Passive Decision", CR: The New Centennial Review 4.3, p. 79-80, Project MUSE~ The friend/enemy division is peculiar at the highest level, at the level 4. The perm attempts to restrict the executive response to the exception, but concedes the existence of an exceptional circumstance. One cannot remain equivocal. This can only paper-over the exception to trigger the impacts.Dysenhaus ’06 (David. The Constitution of Law: Legality in a Time of Emergency. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006. Page 179-180) My point here is not that the majority were wrong to defer, but that 5. The executive is the only actor who can act on the exception. The permutation usurps this power, and prevents any ability to respond to the exception.Dysenhaus ’06 (David. The Constitution of Law: Legality in a Time of Emergency. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006. Page 34.) In the opening line of his book Political Theology, Schmitt claimed that ’Sovereign is 6. The exception is not just an exception from the law, but from all natural laws and rationality. The attempt to combine the alt and the aff guarantees the exception is domesticated and feckless.Ben-Archer ’09 (Noa. "Legal Holes." Unbound Harvard Journal of the Legal Left 5) Schmitt used Bodin’s structural analogy to contest jurisprudential theories that compared law to the natural Claims that liberalism is preferable is merely a tool of the global neo-liberal elite to demonize state’s insisting on national sovereignty and independence.Thorup ’06 The main enemy of cosmopolitan globalization discourse is the nation state and its practitioners. | 10/5/13 |
T - Authority FisaTournament: UTD | Round: Doubles | Opponent: Dartmouth MM | Judge: Sarah Spring, Alex Martel, Christ Stone Authority must be explicitRaven-Hansen 89 The statutory argument against delegation rests on the War Powers Resolution. Section 8( FISA proves, the aff is not a restriction on authorityRed Harvest ’05 B. 1. The aff is not a restriction of War powers authority—at best, it restricts a presidents executive privilege—which is an implied Executive power, not war powers authority C. Limits. Their interp justifies restricting any presidential power as long as it relates, in some amorphous way to war powers. That explodes limits Topic education. Their interp reduces depth of topic research. D. Vote neg for fairness and education | 1/6/14 |
T AuthorityTournament: Wichita State | Round: 3 | Opponent: UTSA CR | Judge: Scott Elliot Authority is the legal right to take action, power is the ability to do soForsythe and Hendrickson 96 Statutory restrictions are limits on authority by congress Judicial restrictions are court enforced interpretations of statutory restrictionsBarron ’08 Violation - The aff doesn’t restrict the authority of the President statutorily or judicially2. Vote Negative:A) Decisionmaking - a limited topic of discussion that provides for equitable ground is key to decision-making and advocacy skillsSteinberg 26 Freeley 8 Debate is a means of settling differences, so there must be a difference of B) Switch-side - effective deliberation is crucial personal agency and is only possible when debaters divorce themselves from ideology to engage in political contestation – the impact is mass violenceRoberts-Miller 3 Totalitarianism and the Competitive Space of Agonism¶ Arendt is probably most famous for her C) Dialogue – our entire negative strategy is based on the "should" question of the resolution—-there are an infinite number of reasons that the scholarship of their advocacy could be a reason to vote affirmative—- these all obviate the only predictable strategies based on topical action—-they overstretch our research burden and undermine preparedness for all debates making effective deliberation impossible which makes it impossible to be negative – voting issue for limits and ground | 1/25/14 |
T Non Subs in the plan textTournament: Wake Forest | Round: 4 | Opponent: JMU BM | Judge: Martin Osborn A. The term substantial is too vague to be used in policy debatesNagin, 2004 b. this is a voting issue1. ground – it’s impossible to know what the plan means2. no solvency – Nagin says the plan would be declared unconstitutional and congress can’t override the courts.3. 2AC clarification is a voting issue – it’s a post hoc rationalization intended only to moot our 1NC offense. | 11/16/13 |
T Signature Strikes - 1NCTournament: Kentucky | Round: 2 | Opponent: James Madison ML | Judge: Brian Box Targeted killings are directed at specific personsAlston 2011 In a targeted killing, the specific goal of the operation is to use lethal Precision is key to topic educationAnderson 2011 A crucial distinction - one first made public, so far as I know, | 10/5/13 |
T Signature Strikes - 2NCTournament: Kentucky | Round: 2 | Opponent: James Madison ML | Judge: Brian Box AND, our interp allows a fair number of affs—sniper shots, poison letters, personality drone attacks, specific commando raids—while their interp allows reckless killings, non-premeditated attacks, and collateral damage affs AND our definition is precise and intuitiveAbresch 9 Studies of targeted killing are often situated within the politically fraught debate over Hellfire missile Our evidence is qualitatively better on this issue AND the personality/signature strike distinction is the crucial to topic education—targeted killing is about counterterrorism, signature strikes is about counterinsurgency. Our ev is more precise AND their interp also adds another set of affs—restrict the type of aircraft that can strikeAnderson 2011 From the US standpoint, it is partly that it does not depend as much Vote neg —- signature strikes and targeted killings are distinct operations with entirely separate lit bases and advantages—-they kill precision and limitsKenneth Anderson 11, Professor at Washington College of Law, American University, Hoover Institution visiting fellow, Non-Resident Visiting Fellow at Brookings, and#34;Efficiency in Bello and ad Bellum: Targeted Killing Through Drone Warfare,and#34; Sept 23 2011, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1812124 They conflate overall drone strategy and tareted killingsKenneth Anderson 13, Professor of International Law at American University, June 2013, and#34;The Case for Drones,and#34; Commentary, Vol. 135, No. 6 This feature of Predators and Reapers — the two forms of drones really at issue plan restricts the authority to enact targeted killings AND targeting on suspicion- topical version of the plan limits the restriction to personality strikesBarela 2013 The concluding point here is not a critique of this book specifically, but rather | 10/5/13 |
TPP PoliticsTournament: Wichita State | Round: 2 | Opponent: KU KS | Judge: Richard Tews TPA will pass-strong bipartisan supportThe White House Bulletin 1/15/14 Randall Stephenson, chairman and CEO of AT26T and chairman of the Business Obama is pushing and his push Is keyThe Hill 1/21 Obama: Give me fast track trade, http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/195858-white-house-works-to-convince-dems-to-give-obama-fast-track-on-trade~~23SPS The White House is making a major push to convince Congress to give the president The plan causes an inter-branch fight – saps PC and derails his agendaKriner 10 Raising or Lowering Political Costs by Affecting Presidential Political Capital Shaping both real and anticipated Bill Key to TradeWatson 1/15 William, trade policy analyst with Cato’s Herbert A Stiefel Center for Trade Policy Studies. His research focuses on U.S. trade remedy policies, disguised protectionism, and the institutional aspects of global trade liberalization, What to Look for in the Upcoming Trade Policy Debate, http://www.cato.org/blog/what-look-upcoming-trade-policy-debate~~23SPS Free trade prevents multiple scenarios for world war and WMD TerrorismPanzner 2008 | 1/25/14 |
Terror DATournament: UNLV | Round: 6 | Opponent: USC PV | Judge: Targeted killing’s vital to counterterrorism—-disrupts leadership and makes carrying out attacks impossibleByman 2013 The Obama administration relies on drones for one simple reason: they work. According Constraining targeted killing’s role in the war on terror causes extinctionBeres 11 Even after the U.S. assassination of Osama bin Laden, we are Nuclear terrorism is feasible - high risk of theft and attacks escalateDvorkin 12 Hundreds of scientific papers and reports have been published on nuclear terrorism. International conferences | 11/11/13 |
Terror DA vs Drone CourtTournament: UCO | Round: 4 | Opponent: UCO FH | Judge: Brian Box Targeted killing’s vital to counterterrorism—-disrupts leadership and makes carrying out attacks impossibleByman 2013 The Obama administration relies on drones for one simple reason: they work. According Ex ante judicial review makes effective drone ops impossible—-even limiting the court to vetting names in advance compromises the timelines of operationsOliphant 12 Civil libertarians and even hawks such as former Rep. Jane Harman of California, Constraining targeted killing’s role in the war on terror causes extinctionBeres 11 Even after the U.S. assassination of Osama bin Laden, we are | 11/12/13 |
Transparency CP - 1NCTournament: Kentucky | Round: 2 | Opponent: James Madison ML | Judge: Brian Box Text: The Executive branch of the United States should publically establish transparency standards outlining its legal rationale for its target killing policy, including the standards and procedures for target selection.CP resolves drone legitimacy and resentmentDaskal 13 4. Procedural Requirements¶ Currently, officials in the executive branch carry out all | 10/5/13 |
Transparency CP - 1NRTournament: Kentucky | Round: 2 | Opponent: James Madison ML | Judge: Brian Box 1 – Education – core topic education is not whether to restrict, but who does it – discussing implementation is keyElmore 80 The emergence of implementation as a subject for policy analysis coincides closely with the discovery | 10/5/13 |
UCO PoliticsTournament: UCO | Round: 2 | Opponent: Texas DS | Judge: Mike Kearney CIR will pass now BUT it will be really closeWilkinson 11/1 (Francis Wilkinson is a member of the Bloomberg View editorial board, http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-11-01/republicans-will-pass-immigration-reform-soon-.html-http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-11-01/republicans-will-pass-immigration-reform-soon-.html, "Republicans Will Pass Immigration Reform. Soon.", AB) Republicans Will Pass Immigration Reform. Soon. Three Republicans signed on to the House The plan causes an inter-branch fight – saps PC and derails his agendaKriner 10 Raising or Lowering Political Costs by Affecting Presidential Political Capital Shaping both real and anticipated Political capital AND focus is keyWilson 10-17 New York University public service professor Paul C. Light is pessimistic that Obama can Immigration reform is key to the economyKrudy 13 The sluggish U.S. economy could get a lift if President Barack Obama Collapse causes nuclear conflictsHarris and Burrows 9 Increased Potential for Global Conflict¶ Of course, the report encompasses more than economics | 11/12/13 |
WildersonTournament: UTD | Round: 5 | Opponent: Wichita State MO | Judge: Rao Ravi THEIR cede the political theory ROMANTIciZES THE WESTERN POLITICAL TRADITION ABANDONING THE VICTIMS OF THE HISTORICAL VIOLENCE OF THE DEMOCRATIC culture WHICH IS THE CAUSE OF DEPOLITICIZION; the plan straight turns their anti-poltics impacts.CHAPUT 2K2 CALLING ON THE LEFT TO ENGAGE IN A CONTEST TO WREST POWER FROM THE RIGHT ONLY REINSTANTIATES THE ANTI-BLACK SEMIOTIC FIELD OF CIVIL SOCIETY. The only alternative is unflinching paradigmatic rejection of civil society.Wilderson 2003 Wilderson, PHD Rhetoric, Berkeley, Gramsci’s Black Marx: Whither the Slave in Civil Society?, Social Identities, Volume 9, Number 2, 2003 The US court system is racist at every step of the way. Evidence collection, jury selection, the trial system itself – all of these components of the legal system are steeped in racism. Putting prisoners through the trial system will NOT lead to reform – we need massive jarring shocks to the system which only the counterplan can solve.Quigley 2010 (Bill, Legal Director @ Center for Constitutional Rights and Professor at Loyola New Orleans. "Fourteen Examples of Racism in Criminal Justice System" http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bill-quigley/fourteen-examples-of-raci_b_658947.html) | 1/6/14 |
XO CP vs CyberTournament: UNLV | Round: 4 | Opponent: CSU FG | Judge: Plan: The President of the United States should issue an executive order to adopt the presumption that cyberattacks will be carried out under the covert action statute. The President of the United States should issue a declaratory policy stating that the United States will not deploy offensive cyber operations first.Making the covert action regime the presumptive framework for cyberattacks restricts presidential authority, facilitates agency cooperation and oversight, and ensures constitutional legitimacy of future attacksBrecher 12 – J.D. candidate @ University of Michigan III. Enacting the Covert Action Regime as Presumptive via Executive Order¶ Cyberattacks present Declaratory policy solvesSinger and Wright 13 Irony pervades President Obama’s place in foreign policy today. He won the Nobel Peace | 11/11/13 |
XO CP vs NukesTournament: UTD | Round: 2 | Opponent: Houston MT | Judge: Matthew Moore The President of the United States should issue a presidential directive announcing that the United States will not introduce nuclear weapons forces first into hostilities.Solves the caseRebeccah Heinrichs and Baker Spring 11-30-2012; Rebeccah Heinrichs is a Visiting Fellow and Baker Spring is F. M. Kirby Research Fellow in National Security Policy in the Douglas and Sarah Allison Center for Foreign Policy Studies, a division of the Kathryn and Shelby Cullom Davis Institute for International Studies, at The Heritage Foundation. "Deterrence and Nuclear Targeting in the 21st Century" Principles for Contemporary Targeting Policy Nuclear targeting policy is ultimately established through presidential guidance, | 1/5/14 |
Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
---|---|---|---|
10/5/13 | blakers19@gmailcom | ||
10/5/13 | blakers19@gmailcom | ||
10/6/13 | blakers19@gmailcom | ||
10/6/13 | blakers19@gmailcom | ||
11/12/13 | tswwst4415@gmailcom | ||
11/12/13 | tswwst4415@gmailcom | ||
11/12/13 | tswwst4415@gmailcom | ||
9/15/13 | carlybevans@gmailcom | ||
10/19/13 | tswwst4415@gmailcom | ||
11/11/13 | tswwst4415@gmailcom | ||
11/11/13 | tswwst4415@gmailcom | ||
11/11/13 | tswwst4415@gmailcom | ||
11/11/13 | tswwst4415@gmailcom | ||
1/10/14 | tswwst4415@gmailcom | ||
2/13/14 | Sheaffly@gmailcom | ||
2/13/14 | Sheaffly@gmailcom | ||
2/13/14 | Sheaffly@gmailcom | ||
2/13/14 | Sheaffly@gmailcom | ||
1/5/14 | tswwst4415@gmailcom | ||
1/5/14 | tswwst4415@gmailcom | ||
1/6/14 | tswwst4415@gmailcom | ||
1/6/14 | tswwst4415@gmailcom | ||
1/6/14 | tswwst4415@gmailcom | ||
11/16/13 | tswwst4415@gmailcom | ||
11/16/13 | tswwst4415@gmailcom | ||
11/17/13 | tswwst4415@gmailcom | ||
1/25/14 | tswwst4415@gmailcom | ||
1/25/14 | tswwst4415@gmailcom | ||
1/26/14 | tswwst4415@gmailcom |
Air Force
Amherst
Appalachian State
Arizona State
Army
Augustana
Bard
Baylor
Binghamton
Boston College
Capital
CSU Long Beach
CSU Northridge
CSU Sacramento
CUNY
Cal Berkeley
Cal Lutheran
Cal Poly SLO
Case Western
Central Florida
Central Oklahoma
Chico
Clarion
Columbia
Concordia
Cornell
Dartmouth
Denver
Drexel-Swarthmore
ENMU
East Los Angeles College
Eastern Washington
Emory
Emporia
Fayetteville State
Florida
Florida Int'l
Florida State
Fordham
Fresno State
Fullerton
Gainesville State
George Mason
George Washington
Georgetown
Georgia
Georgia State
Georgia Tech
Gonzaga
Harvard
Houston
Idaho State
Illinois
Illinois State
Indiana
Iowa
Irvine/SFSU
James Madison
John Carroll
Johns Hopkins
Johnson County CC
KCKCC
Kansas
Kansas State
Kentucky
LA City College
Lakeland
Lewis-Clark State College
Liberty
Lindenwood
Los Rios
Louisville
Loyola
Macalester
Marist
Mary Washington
Mercer
Methodist
Miami FL
Miami OH
Michigan
Michigan State
Minnesota
Mission
Missouri State
NYU
Navy
New School
North Texas
Northern Iowa
Northwestern
Notre Dame
Ohio Wesleyan
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pepperdine
Piedmont
Pittsburgh
Portland State
Princeton
Puget Sound
Redlands
Richmond
Rochester
Rutgers
Samford
San Diego State
San Francisco State
Santa Clara
South Florida St Pete
Southern Methodist
Southwestern
Stanford
Texas State
Texas-Austin
Texas-Dallas
Texas-San Antonio
Texas-Tyler
Towson
Trinity
U Chicago
UCLA
UDC-CC
UMKC
UNLV
USC
Utah
Vanderbilt
Vermont
Virginia Tech
Wake Forest
Wash U (St. Louis)
Washburn
Washington
Wayne State
Weber
West Georgia
West Virginia
Western Connecticut
Whitman
Wichita State
Wisconsin Oshkosh
Wyoming