General Actions:
Wiki: opencaselist13
▼:
Document Index
»
Space: Wyoming
▼:
Document Index
»
Page: Frame-ThomsonLichty Neg
Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Video | Edit/Delete |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
All | 1 | Questions |
| |||||
UNT | 1 | K-State SS | Joel Reed |
| ||||
UNT | 5 | Idaho State DI | Sarah Topp |
| ||||
UNT | 3 | Houston LR | Brian DeLong |
| ||||
UNT | 7 | Trinity VY | Justin Stanley |
| ||||
UTD | 4 | K-State MR | Brian DeLong |
| ||||
UTD | 2 | MoState CR | Jason Russell |
| ||||
UTD | 5 | Kansas HM | Joel Reed |
| ||||
UTD | 7 | UNI AE | Darren Elliott |
|
Tournament | Round | Report |
---|---|---|
All | 1 | Opponent: Questions | Judge: Meow |
UNT | 1 | Opponent: K-State SS | Judge: Joel Reed 1AC Drone courts |
UNT | 5 | Opponent: Idaho State DI | Judge: Sarah Topp 1AC Sexual violence in the debate community |
UNT | 3 | Opponent: Houston LR | Judge: Brian DeLong 1AC Jirga aff |
UNT | 7 | Opponent: Trinity VY | Judge: Justin Stanley 1AC Anti-Drones Micropolitics |
UTD | 4 | Opponent: K-State MR | Judge: Brian DeLong 1AC Drone Courts |
UTD | 2 | Opponent: MoState CR | Judge: Jason Russell 1AC Ban nuclear first strikes |
UTD | 5 | Opponent: Kansas HM | Judge: Joel Reed 1AC Charming Betsy |
UTD | 7 | Opponent: UNI AE | Judge: Darren Elliott 1AC Reflect on war through Fem IR |
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Entry | Date |
---|---|
000 Please ReadTournament: All | Round: 1 | Opponent: Questions | Judge: An open cage match is always on the table. That's you, UNLV EJ. Organizational method: 2 Disads 3 Counterplans 4 Criticisms | 3/16/14 |
1 Framework v Houston LRTournament: UNT | Round: 3 | Opponent: Houston LR | Judge: Brian DeLong A. OUR INTERPRETATION: THE AFFIRMATIVE SHOULD PRESENT A TOPICAL PLAN OF ACTION AND DEFEND THAT THEIR POLICY SHOULD BE ADOPTED BY THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENTB. DEFINITIONS:1. THE TOPIC IS DEFINED BY THE PHRASE FOLLOWING THE COLON – THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS THE AGENT OF THE RESOLUTION, NOT THE INDIVIDUAL DEBATERS Use of a colon before a list or an explanation that is preceded by a clause that can stand by itself. Think of the colon as a gate, inviting one to go on… If the introductory phrase preceding the colon is very brief and the clause following the colon represents the real business of the sentence, begin the clause after the colon with a capital letter. 2. "RESOLVED" EXPRESSES INTENT TO IMPLEMENT THE PLANAmerican Heritage Dictionary 2K To find a solution to; solve … 3. "SHOULD" DENOTES AN EXPECTATION OF ENACTING A PLAN 4. THE U.S.F.G. is three branches of government Supreme Court of the United States, highest court in the United States and the chief authority in the judicial branch, one of three branches of the United States federal government. 5. OUR DEFINITION EXCLUDES ACTION BY SMALLER POLITICAL GROUPS OR INDIVIDUALS. Federal government 1. A national government that exercises some degree of control over smaller political units that have surrendered some degree of power in exchange for the right to participate in national political matters. C. VIOLATION – THE AFFIRMATIVE IS NOT AN INSTRUMENTAL AFFIRMATION OF THE RESOLUTION –D. REASONS TO PREFER –PREDICTABILITY: the resolution sets the limits for the debate. Affirmatives would always win if there wasn’t predictable negative ground.Constraints are more conducive to creative thinking—following the rules is key to innovationGibbert et al. 07 Bounded knowledge is good – debate should be maintained as a disciplinary space- key to unlocking critically pedagogies potential for social justiceMcArthur 10 SWITCH-SIDE DEBATE SOLVES: topics are meaningless if we don’t debate both sides: topic-specific education outweighs general education.Switch-side debate good—direct engagement with identities we don’t identify with is critical to overcome the existential resentment we feel towards the OtherGlover 10 E. VOTING ISSUE FOR GROUND, COMPETITIVE EQUITY AND JURISDICTION.THIS ARGUMENT PROVIDES A-PRIORI REASONS TO VOTE NEGATIVE. YOU MUST USE YOUR BALLOT TO RATIFY CONSTRAINTS ON DISCOURSE TO PRESERVE A POLITICALLY-ENABLING DISCUSSIONShively 2K THE DELIBERATIVE IMPLICATIONS OF THEIR ADVOCACY ARE A PRIOR QUESTION – PRE-CONDITIONS OF AGREEMENT ARE NECESSARY FOR YOUR DECISION TO HAVE ANY POLITICAL VALUEGunderson 2K | 2/14/14 |
1 Framework v ISU DITournament: UNT | Round: 5 | Opponent: Idaho State DI | Judge: Sarah Topp a. Interpretation and violation—-the affirmative should defend the desirability of topical government actionMost predictable—the agent and verb indicate a debate about hypothetical government actionJon M Ericson 3, Dean Emeritus of the College of Liberal Arts – California Polytechnic U., et al., The Debater’s Guide, Third Edition, p. 4 "Resolved" is legislativeJeff Parcher 1, former debate coach at Georgetown, Feb 2001 http://www.ndtceda.com/archives/200102/0790.html Debate over a controversial point of action creates argumentative stasis—the resolution is key to decision makingSteinberg and Freely 08 Debate needs middle of the road constraints; unbridled affirmation destroys dialogue that are key to political discussionHanghoj 08 b. Vote negPreparation and clash—changing the topic post facto manipulates balance of prep, which structurally favors the aff because they speak last and permute alternatives—strategic fairness is key to engaging a well-prepared opponentTopical fairness requirements are key to effective dialogue—monopolizing strategy and prep makes the discussion one-sided and subverts any meaningful neg roleSimulated national security law debates preserve agency and enhance decision-making—-avoids cooptionLaura K. Donohue 13, Associate Professor of Law, Georgetown Law, 4/11, "National Security Law Pedagogy and the Role of Simulations", http://jnslp.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/National-Security-Law-Pedagogy-and-the-Role-of-Simulations.pdf | 2/14/14 |
1 T Armed ForcesTournament: UTD | Round: 2 | Opponent: MoState CR | Judge: Jason Russell The aff is not topical —- introducing armed forces only refers to human troops, not weapons systems such as —- prefer our interpretation because it’s based on textual analysis, legislative history, and intent of the WPRLorber 13 – Eric Lorber, J.D. Candidate, University of Pennsylvania Law School, Ph.D Candidate, Duke University Department of Political Science. January 2013, "Executive Warmaking Authority and Offensive Cyber Operations: Can Existing Legislation Successfully Constrain Presidential Power?" University of Pennsylvania Journal of Contsitutional Law, 15 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 961, lexis nexis Vote negative for predictable limits —- nuclear weapons is a whole topic on its own —- requires research into a whole separate literature base —- undermines preparedness for all debates. | 1/8/14 |
2 Immigration PoliticsTournament: UTD | Round: 4 | Opponent: K-State MR | Judge: Brian DeLong Immigration reform will pass – PC is keyLopez 1/1/14 (Oscar, Latin Times, "New Year 2014: 4 Reasons Immigration Reform Will Pass In 2014," http://www.latintimes.com/new-year-2014-4-reasons-immigration-reform-will-pass-2014-141778) Immigration reform is set to be the key issue of 2014. Following Mitt Romney’s Fighting to defend his war power will sap Obama’s capital, trading off with rest of agendaKriner, 10 —- assistant professor of political science at Boston University Reform key to biotech leadershipSchuster 13 Biotech key to solve bioterror attacksBailey 1 ~Ronald, award-winning science correspondent for Reason magazine and Reason.com, where he writes a weekly science and technology column. Bailey is the author of the book Liberation Biology: The Moral and Scientific Case for the Biotech Revolution (Prometheus, 2005), and his work was featured in The Best American Science and Nature Writing 2004. In 2006, Bailey was shortlisted by the editors of Nature Biotechnology as one of the personalities who have made the "most significant contributions" to biotechnology in the last 10 years. 11/7/1, "The Best Biodefense," Reason, http://reason.com/archives/2001/11/07/the-best-biodefense-http://reason.com/archives/2001/11/07/the-best-biodefense~~ But Cipro and other antibiotics are just a small part of the arsenal that could ExtinctionSteinbrenner 97 | 1/8/14 |
2 Pres Flex DATournament: UTD | Round: 4 | Opponent: K-State MR | Judge: Brian DeLong Obama has built a solid basis for expanded Executive authority in the courts and congress – Syria continues the trendGordon Silverstein, Assistant Dean and Lecturer in Law at Yale Law School, and author of Law’s Allure: How Law Shapes, Constrains, Saves and Kills Politics, "Obama Just Increased Executive Power—Again," New Republic, 9/4/2013 There’s no middle ground-congressional action on targeted killing hampers the president’s constitutional authority to respond to security threatsPosner 2012 And even if the president wants to fling drones at non-al-Qaida The plan collapses executive crisis response —- triggers terrorism, rogue state attacks, and wildfire prolifJohn Yoo 8/30/13, Emanuel S. Heller Professor of Law @ UC-Berkeley Law, visiting scholar @ the American Enterprise Institute, former Fulbright Distinguished Chair in Law @ the University of Trento, served as a deputy assistant attorney general in the Office of Legal Council at the U.S. Department of Justice between 2001 and 2003, received his J.D. from Yale and his undergraduate degree from Harvard, "Like it or not, Constitution allows Obama to strike Syria without Congressional approval," Fox News, http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2013/08/30/constitution-allows-obama-to-strike-syria-without-congressional-approval/-http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2013/08/30/constitution-allows-obama-to-strike-syria-without-congressional-approval/ Nuclear weapons prolif puts weapons in the hands of rogue states—rogue states multiply and this guarantees accidents and miscalculations that lead to nuke war.Johnson, Forbes contributor and Presidential Medal of Freedom winner, 2013 | 1/8/14 |
2 Terror DATournament: UTD | Round: 5 | Opponent: Kansas HM | Judge: Joel Reed Al Qaeda is weak now but could recover if the US allows them the opportunityMcLaughlin 13 Al-Bihani interpretation key to fighting the war on terror, judiciary can’t manage the contraryMcGrail, 10 Constrained executive makes it impossible to respond to the rapid and existential nature of the threat posed by terrorism-strong, flexible executive key to check nuclear, chemical, and biological attacksRoyal 2011 Terrorist retaliation causes nuclear war – draws in Russia and ChinaAyson, 10 | 1/8/14 |
3 Declaratory Policy CPDeterrence Net BenTournament: UTD | Round: 2 | Opponent: MoState CR | Judge: Jason Russell Text —— The United States Executive Branch should establish a declaratory policy that the United States will not introduce nuclear weapons first into hostilities.The plan is action policy and the CP is declaratory policy. Under declaratory NFU, it’s possible that in the face of incontrovertible evidence that an adversary is about to launch a nuclear strike, the U.S. could use nuclear weapons first.Tertrais 9 – Bruno Tertrais, Senior Research Fellow at the Paris-based Foundation for Strategic Research and Contributing Editor to Survival, October-November 2009, "The Trouble with No First Use," Survival, Vol. 51, No. 5, p. 26-27 Executive NFU declaration solves the 1AC internal linksHarold A. Feiveson, senior research scientist, and co-director of the Program on Science and Global Security at the Woodrow Wilson School at Princeton University and Ernst Jan Hogendoorn is a Ph.D. student at the Woodrow Wilson School, 2003, No First Use of Nuclear Weapons, http://cns.miis.edu/npr/pdfs/102feiv.pdf Countries advocating a legally binding no-first-use commitment emphasize that the commitment Only the presidential leadership solves—plan is meaninglessJanne Nolan, Ph.D., George Washington University IR Professor, James Holmes, 2008, The Bureaucracy of Deterrence, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 64.1 Among the many factors working against fundamental change is the inherent resilience of bureaucratic culture The net-benefit is crisesThe U.S. would only override a declaratory NFU in an extreme crisis—-and global public opinion would rally behind the U.S.Feiveson and Hogendoorn 3 – Harold Feiveson, senior research scientist and co-director of the Program in Science 26 Global Security at the Woodrow Wilson School at Princeton, and Ernst Hogendoorn, Ph.D. Candidate at the Woodrow Wilson School at Princeton, Summer 2003, "No First Use of Nuclear Weapons," The Nonproliferation Review, online: http://cns.miis.edu/npr/pdfs/102feiv.pdf Completely prohibiting all scenarios for first-use costs hundreds of thousands of lives in an inevitable crisis—-the CP’s declaratory NFU enables the U.S. to override its declared posture and launch damage-limitation strikes against an imminent nuclear attackerTertrais 9 – Bruno Tertrais, Senior Research Fellow at the Paris-based Foundation for Strategic Research and Contributing Editor to Survival, October-November 2009, "The Trouble with No First Use," Survival, Vol. 51, No. 5, p. 25 Only a declaratory NFU creates successful existential deterrence—-the knowledge that a declaratory NFU could be revoked in crisis de-escalates tension and prevents conflictFeiveson and Hogendoorn 3 – Harold Feiveson, senior research scientist and co-director of the Program in Science 26 Global Security at the Woodrow Wilson School at Princeton, and Ernst Hogendoorn, Ph.D. Candidate at the Woodrow Wilson School at Princeton, Summer 2003, "No First Use of Nuclear Weapons," The Nonproliferation Review, online: http://cns.miis.edu/npr/pdfs/102feiv.pdf | 1/8/14 |
3 En Banc CPTournament: UTD | Round: 5 | Opponent: Kansas HM | Judge: Joel Reed The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit should form an en banc panel to review its opinion in Al-Bihani v. Obama on the basis of maintaining uniformity and on the exceptional importance of the case. The en banc panel of the D.C. Circuit should decide that its ruling in Al-Bihani v. Obama has no precedential effect on any other court, that it was limited solely to the facts presented in the original case and that no court should regard Al-Bihani v. Obama as a repudiation of the Charming Betsy canon.The CP solves all of their advantages 26 locks in SQ Presidential detention powers:The CP limits the reach of al-Bihani by blocking its application in other contextsThomas G. Hansford 26 James F. Spriggs 7, 8-7-, "The Politics of Precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court," http://press.princeton.edu/chapters/s8204.html The D.C. Circuit can rehear the case en bancD.C. Circuit Rules ’11 – Authored by Clerks of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals | 1/8/14 |
3 XO CPTournament: UTD | Round: 4 | Opponent: K-State MR | Judge: Brian DeLong Text: The President of the United States should issue an executive order to create an intra-executive review over targeted killing orders.Intra-executive drone tribunals solves-ensures accountability and prevents errors while maintaining the legitimacy of national security secretsCrandall, 2012 | 1/8/14 |
4 Clothesline PIKTournament: UNT | Round: 5 | Opponent: Idaho State DI | Judge: Sarah Topp The logic of testimony is flawed in its assumption that the confessional discourse can be controlled by and is limited in its effects on the confessing individual. Each time a woman takes a stand, her voice is recorded not as that of Jane Smith, but as that of all women. Individual testimony invariably comes to monopolize the meaning of womanhood in a way that establishes the story of greatest suffering as the highest truth of female identity.Wendy Brown, Professor of Political Theory @ UC Berkeley, 1996 ("Constitutions and ’Survivor Stories’: In the ’folds of our own discourse’ The Pleasures and Freedoms of Silence." 3 U Chi L Sch Roundtable 185; swp) The demand for solidarity and speaking out equate silence with weakness and forces women to participate in oppressive power structuresRuffino, 2007 The aff’s politics of visibility turn rape victims and "those who resist masculine oppression" into objects to be seen and manipulatedRuffino, 2007 The aff’s speaking out is a form confessional discourse that traps individuals within the confines of power, this narrativization is viewed as therapeutic which undermines its political powerRuffino, 2007 Confession never takes place outside the relays of power. Confessing our sins may give us some sort of emotional release but, in that action, we neglect to see how that release reinforces the will of the master and sovereign. Thus, the act of confessing becomes a perpetual relay of normalization that destroys the possibility of resistance. Each link we win is an independent case turn and reason to reject caseFoucault 1978, (Michel, Former director @ the Institut Francais at Hamburg. The History of Sexuality Volume I. 1978. pgs 59-67) The alternative is to Clothesline debateClotheslines solves the aff and avoids the links to the k—allows criticism of society’s "dirty laundry" without causing personal narrativizationRuffino, 2007 | 2/14/14 |
4 NietzscheTournament: UTD | Round: 7 | Opponent: UNI AE | Judge: Darren Elliott First, the Will to power is a part of life, it makes violence and suffering inevitable, —we should embrace it, this is key to affirm the will to lifeNietzsche, 1886 (Friedrich, Philosopher with a hammer, "Beyond Good and Evil" The Nietzsche Channel, online, MB) And, embracing the tension of being marginalized, the tension and suffering of marginalization are prerequisites to greatnessHIGGINS ’06 And, their imagination of a better world is a continuation of the ascetic ideal. This association of all that is good at not of this world expresses a hatred for the only one we’ve got—turns case. Fantasizing about a world without suffering produces creative impotence only our relationship to life can escape this paradox of resentmentTurlani in 2003 And, the 1ac’s vision of a perfect world causes us to hate the one we have, leads to denial of life of this life for a more perfect oneNietzsche, 1872 (Friedrich, philosopher, "The Birth of Tragedy" Online, MB) Thus the alternative: | 1/8/14 |
4 Peace KTournament: UTD | Round: 2 | Opponent: MoState CR | Judge: Jason Russell The logic of the affirmative asks how war should be waged rather than if war should be waged at all—their methods only spark temporary interest in the military-industrial complex—it leads to free reign of the mentality of constant warLichterman 3 Awareness of militarism key – our internalized acceptance of war guarantees endless violence that ensures planetary destruction and structural violenceLawrence 9 The alternative is to reject the 1AC in favor of a pacifistic solution to problems.The only way to solve is by adopting a pacifistic mindset—the shift away from militarism is keyDemenchonok 9 Moving away from the aff’s crisis-driven politics is key to solvencyCuomo 96 | 1/8/14 |
Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
---|---|---|---|
2/14/14 | bravette2012@gmailcom | ||
2/14/14 | bravette2012@gmailcom | ||
2/14/14 | bravette2012@gmailcom | ||
2/14/14 | bravette2012@gmailcom | ||
1/8/14 | bravette2012@gmailcom | ||
1/8/14 | bravette2012@gmailcom | ||
1/8/14 | bravette2012@gmailcom | ||
1/8/14 | bravette2012@gmailcom |
Air Force
Amherst
Appalachian State
Arizona State
Army
Augustana
Bard
Baylor
Binghamton
Boston College
Capital
CSU Long Beach
CSU Northridge
CSU Sacramento
CUNY
Cal Berkeley
Cal Lutheran
Cal Poly SLO
Case Western
Central Florida
Central Oklahoma
Chico
Clarion
Columbia
Concordia
Cornell
Dartmouth
Denver
Drexel-Swarthmore
ENMU
East Los Angeles College
Eastern Washington
Emory
Emporia
Fayetteville State
Florida
Florida Int'l
Florida State
Fordham
Fresno State
Fullerton
Gainesville State
George Mason
George Washington
Georgetown
Georgia
Georgia State
Georgia Tech
Gonzaga
Harvard
Houston
Idaho State
Illinois
Illinois State
Indiana
Iowa
Irvine/SFSU
James Madison
John Carroll
Johns Hopkins
Johnson County CC
KCKCC
Kansas
Kansas State
Kentucky
LA City College
Lakeland
Lewis-Clark State College
Liberty
Lindenwood
Los Rios
Louisville
Loyola
Macalester
Marist
Mary Washington
Mercer
Methodist
Miami FL
Miami OH
Michigan
Michigan State
Minnesota
Mission
Missouri State
NYU
Navy
New School
North Texas
Northern Iowa
Northwestern
Notre Dame
Ohio Wesleyan
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pepperdine
Piedmont
Pittsburgh
Portland State
Princeton
Puget Sound
Redlands
Richmond
Rochester
Rutgers
Samford
San Diego State
San Francisco State
Santa Clara
South Florida St Pete
Southern Methodist
Southwestern
Stanford
Texas State
Texas-Austin
Texas-Dallas
Texas-San Antonio
Texas-Tyler
Towson
Trinity
U Chicago
UCLA
UDC-CC
UMKC
UNLV
USC
Utah
Vanderbilt
Vermont
Virginia Tech
Wake Forest
Wash U (St. Louis)
Washburn
Washington
Wayne State
Weber
West Georgia
West Virginia
Western Connecticut
Whitman
Wichita State
Wisconsin Oshkosh
Wyoming