Tournament: GSU | Round: 1 | Opponent: Wake PP | Judge: 

Adv 1

Advantage one is Drone Wars

Constraints influence global drone practices – the impact is global war

Dowd, 13 ~Drone Wars: Risks and Warnings Alan W. Dowd, Alan W. Dowd writes on national defense, foreign policy, and international security. His writing has appeared in multiple publications including Parameters, Policy Review, The Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations, World Politics Review, American Outlook, The Baltimore Sun, The Washington Times, The National Post, The Wall Street Journal Europe, The Jerusalem Post, and The Financial Times Deutschland, Parameters 42(4)/43(1) Winter-Spring 2013~ 

In short, it seems Washington has been seduced by the Jupiter Complex. Being
AND
spawned a new era of danger for the United States and its allies.

Unfettered drone prolif causes deterrence crises that lead to nuclear conflict and Indo-Pak war

Boyle, 13 ~and#34;The costs and consequences of drone warfareand#34;, MICHAEL J. BOYLE, International Affairs 89: 1 (2013) 1–29, assistant professor of political science at LaSalle University~ 

The emergence of this arms race for drones raises at least five long-term
AND
legal architecture which might avert some of the worst consequences of their use.

Indo Pak war causes extinction

Greg Chaffin 11, Research Assistant at Foreign Policy in Focus, July 8, 2011, and#34;Reorienting U.S. Security Strategy in South Asia,and#34; online: http://www.fpif.org/articles/reorienting_us_security_strategy_in_south_asia

The greatest threat to regional security (although curiously not at the top of most
AND
well lead to all-out war between the two that couldquickly escalate.

Escalation uniquely likely now – no impact defense

Overdorf, 8/15/13 ~Jason, Overdorf covers India for GlobalPost. Overdorf has spent most of the past 15 years living and working in Asia. He worked as an editor with Dow Jones Newswires in New York, Singapore and Hong Kong before moving to New Delhi and becoming a freelance writer in 2002. He was a frequent contributor to the Far Eastern Economic Review until 2004, covering Indian politics, society and business. Since 2004, he has been a special correspondent at Newsweek International, where he writes on a wide range of topics. He has covered Sonia Gandhi’s surprising electoral victory, the ongoing problem of Hindu fundamentalism, the simmering conflict with Maoist rebels, and societal changes resulting from India’s meteoric economic growth.  He’s written for the Atlantic Monthly and the Asian Wall Street Journal. His travel articles, personal essays and political commentary have appeared in Smithsonian Magazine, Departures, Travelers’ Tales and other publications.  He has degrees in English literature and creative writing from Columbia University, Washington University and Boston University.and#34;Analysis: Are India and Pakistan headed for war? Under heavy shelling, Kashmir is again set to stymie the Indo-Pak peace process. And the risks are mountingand#34; Citing Experts at the Woodrow Wilson Center, http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/war/conflict-zones/130814/analysis-are-india-and-pakistan-headed-war~~ 

and#34;This is a sad reality of India-Pakistan relations — whenever things are
AND
lead to escalation,and#34; Kugelman said. and#34;And that’s a scary thought.and#34;

Establishing a precedent of transparency and accountability spills over globally– a non-executive framework is key

Brooks 13 (Rosa, Professor of Law – Georgetown University Law Center, Bernard L. Schwartz Senior Fellow – New America Foundation, Former Counselor to the Undersecretary of Defense for Policy – Department of Defense, and#34;The Constitutional and Counterterrorism Implications of Targeted Killing,and#34; Testimony Before the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Human Rights, 4-23, http://www.judiciary.senate.gov/pdf/04-23-13BrooksTestimony.pdf)

5. Setting Troubling International Precedents Here is an additional reason to worry about the
AND
them to justify the killing of dissidents, rivals

Tournament: Shirley | Round: 1 | Opponent: Binghamton Reddick-Sehgal | Judge: KOSLOW
1AC

The lives of animals on factory farms:

http://www.animal-rights-action.com/factory-farming.html
“Factory Farming: A Life of Animal Abuse”

What is Factory Farming? This barbaric ….. being fattened up before being slaughtered.

Every day, each and every one of us participates in a war which consists of endless genocide of the non-human. Every year, billions of nonhumans are slaughtered by humans. They are captured, detained, tortured and killed for the sake of consumption. This violence is rendered invisible by a normative understanding of war powers that excuses violence against the non-human as legitimate.
Kochi 9 - Sussex Law School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK (Tarik, “Species War: Law, Violence and Animals,” SAGE Journals)

7. The idea that war ….Humans and Other Animals ( London: Routledge, 2000).

This Western conception of war powers is grounded upon a hierarchy of values that regards nonhuman life as raw material for the preservation of human life.
Kochi 9 - Sussex Law School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK (Tarik, “Species War: Law, Violence and Animals,” SAGE Journals)

The response of the …. within the early modern juridical ordering of war. 

Anthropocentrism has been the foundational model for any and every form of discrimination. Any argument that attempts to claim superiority of the human over the nonhuman rests on the same justifications used by White European males to subjugate other humans
Best 7 – Associate Professor at the University of Texas in the Department of Humanities and Philosophy (Steven, “Eternal Treblinka: Our Treatment of Animals and the Holocaust, by Charles Patterson” Journal for Critical Animal Studies, http://www.criticalanimalstudies.org/JCAS/Journal_Articles_download/Issue_7/bestpatterson.pdf)

While a welcome advance over the …. official Chistianithy left behind.

The first step is a reorientation towards the meaning and language of war. The move to exclude speciesist exploitation from the category of war is the same move of other historical acts of genocide. Our aff demands the recognition of the unending violence against the nonhuman as war.
Kochi 9 - Sussex Law School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK (Tarik “Species War: Law, Violence and Animals”

The meanings … treat people like animals.” 14

Thus, in response to the resolutional question of what constitutes legitimate Presidential violence, Rishee and I affirm the value of the nonhuman. 

Voting aff acknowledges the existence of species war and the hidden war powers that legislate its existence. We must reject the hierarchy of species and the notion that violence against the nonhuman is legitimate.
Kochi 9 - Sussex Law School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK (Tarik, “Species War: Law, Violence and Animals,” SAGE Journals)

Although species war remains …, as a generator, as a motor. 7

The 1AC is an act of assuming a traitorous identity. The dynamics of different forms of privilege posits us all as in positions of both the oppressor and oppressed. In the species war, we are all human oppressors complicit with a cycle of tortuous violence. The only feasible solution is to work against the structures of our own culture. This does not mean we deny our identities or claim unity with the oppressed, but it does mean we adopt an ethic that attempts to minimize our own domination.  
Plumwood 2 – (Val, “Environmental Ethics”, p.205-6)

There are, I have suggested, …. more or less open-ended way.

The ballot should decide between competing advocacies. Debates about war powers should not merely concern legal rules, but also the way our normative prescriptions of value infuse the law with meaning.
Kochi 09 - Sussex Law School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK (Tarik, “Species War: Law, Violence and Animals,” SAGE Journals)

In everyday speech… understand the legitimate use of violence. 2

2AC 

The distinction between good and bare life lies at the heart of Western politics. We must challenge the hierarchy between the human and nonhuman or risk unending violence.
Kochi 9 - Sussex Law School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK (Tarik “Species War: Law, Violence and Animals”)

The distinction between … war's norm-alization.

Our use of images of animal suffering is vital to save the movement toward veganism—we unfortunately control uniqueness on this question
DeCoux 09—Associate Professor of Law, Florida Coastal School of Law (Elizabeth, 16 Animal L. 9, “SPEAKING FOR THE MODERN PROMETHEUS: THE SIGNIFICANCE OF ANIMAL SUFFERING TO THE ABOLITION MOVEMENT,” Lexis Nexis, RBatra)

 *44 Reducing the suffering of …, depravities, and whims of humans.

Wuthrmann 11 – Wesleyan University (“Animal-Attentive Queer Theories”, BA honors thesis at Wesleyan, http://wesscholar.wesleyan.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1644andcontext=etd_hon_theses) 

For the purpose of my thesis …queer theory’s critical realm.

Wuthrmann 11 – Wesleyan University (“Animal-Attentive Queer Theories”, BA honors thesis at Wesleyan, http://wesscholar.wesleyan.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1644andcontext=etd_hon_theses) 

This uneasy historical dynamic, as …. on a human/animal binary.