Tournament: ceda | Round: 3 | Opponent: wake bs | Judge: koch
Before the law is a gatekeeper. To this gatekeeper comes a man from the
AND
to him, since he can no longer lift up his stiffening body.
The gatekeeper has to bend way down to him, for the great difference has
AND
entrance was assigned only to you. I’m going now to close it.
Franz Kafka, the parable "Before the Law," http://www.kafka-online.info/before-the-law-page2.html
"Before the Law" is Franz Kafka’s profound RUPTURE with the transcendent ordering of the law, which sees the law as existing but always out there, in the hands only of the gate keepers, who validate the existence of the objective Law via the act of punishment, an endless feedback loop of representations on top of representations of the law, ultimately concealing that there is just no there there.
We affirm the potentiality of minor literature to put the law, language, and reality themselves to flight: Kafka writes escape routes that use representations of the law themselves to dismantle the assemblage of the law, to focus in on such small parts of the so-called law that the assumed existence of such a system is called into question.
Deleuze and Guattari 86. Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari, Kafka: Toward a Minor Literature, "Immanence and Desire," pg. 43-52
Negative theology (or the theology of absence), the transcendence of the law,
AND
ways that Max Brod arranged things to support his thesis of negative theology.
Two chapters are of particular concern: the brief final chapter, about K’s execution
AND
that entitled "The Lawyer, the Industrialist, and the Painter."1
From the point of view of a supposed transcendence of the law, there must
AND
the law, rather than being the necessary and derived expression of it.
The three worst themes in many interpretations of Kafka are the transcen- dence of
AND
, to the becoming-animal, to the machinic and collective assemblages.
So, should we support realist and social interpretations of Kafka? Certainly, since
AND
political and that has nothing to do with an activity of intimacy.3
Writing itself can have a radical character: translate everything into assemblages or machines of words, and then dismantle those assemblages. This is particularly poignant in terms of how Kafka, a Czech Jew, chose to situate himself within the German language of the majority in order to force it to take flight
Deleuze and Guattari 86. Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari, Kafka: Toward a Minor Literature, "Immanence and Desire," pg. 43-52
Writing has a double function: to translate everything into assemblages and to dismantle the
AND
texts on transcendental law in short stories that he detaches from the whole).
Thus there remain machinic assemblages as objects of the novel. This time the machinic
AND
and this is certainly not a mental, psychical, or interior procedure.
Where one believed there was the law, there was in fact desire and desire alone: the law is written in a porno book, and we’re all fantasizing, calling its transcendent order into existence
Deleuze and Guattari 86. Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari, Kafka: Toward a Minor Literature, "Immanence and Desire," pg. 43-52
Here, then, are the new characteristics of the novelistic machinic assemblage in opposition
AND
the scene, all those microevents that express desire and its arbitrary fortunes.
Renounce the idea of the transcendence of the law. Hold the law up to molecular, microscopic investigation: tiny affects, momentary perceptions, and quotidian interpretations contribute to a collective desiring-law which holds the whole system together. Situate the law immanent to your own body: how do you participate in it? Lose yourself, your essence, and your sense of personhood and study the fluxes and flows of desire which made those attributes realizable in the first place.
Deleuze and Guattari 86. Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari, Kafka: Toward a Minor Literature, "Immanence and Desire," pg. 43-52
From this point on, it is even more important to renounce the idea of
AND
just the same as the ones he’s never yet passed." Justice is the
continuum of desire, with shifting limits that are always displaced.?It is this
AND
Oedipalization of Gregor, the platonic apple that his father throws at him.
Deleuze and Negri 95. Gilles Deleuze and Antonio Negri, "Control and Becoming," Negotiations, Columbia University Press, pg. 173-6
Negri: How can minority-becoming be powerful? How can resistance become an
AND
the juridical paradox that con¬stitutive power can be defined only by constituted power?
Deleuze: The difference between minorities and majorities isn’t their size. A minority may
AND
to take up Bergson’s notion of tabulation and give it a political meaning.
Negri: In your book on Foucault, and then again in your TV interview
AND
Maybe in a communication society it’s less Utopian than it used to be?
Deleuze: We’re definitely moving toward "control" societies that are no longer exactly
AND
create vacuoles of noncommunication, circuit breakers, so we can elude control.
Deleuze and Guattari 86. Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari, Kafka: Toward a Minor Literature, "What is Minor Literature?" pg. 17-18
So far we have dealt with little more than contents and their forms: bent
AND
what blacks in America today are able to do with the English language.)
The second characteristic of minor literatures is that everything in them is political. In
AND
absorbs everyone no less than as a matter of life and death."2
The third characteristic of minor literature is that in it everything takes on a collective
AND
individual would be separable from the collective and would lead its own life).
Before the law, we are unresolved: The United States federal government should substantially increase statutory and/or judicial restrictions on the war powers authority of the President of the United States in one or more of the following areas: targeted killing; indefinite detention; offensive cyber operations; or introducing United States Armed Forces into hostilities.