General Actions:
Wiki: opencaselist13
▼:
Document Index
»
Space: Houston
▼:
Document Index
»
Page: Lanning-Bockmon Neg
Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Video | Edit/Delete |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSU | 1 | UGA | Rob Mills |
| ||||
Gsu | 8 | Missouri State Bess-Rumbaugh | Atchison |
| ||||
Gsu | 8 | Missouri State Bess-Rumbaugh | Atchison |
| ||||
Gsu | 6 | Emory Karthikeyan-Morrow | Quigley |
| ||||
Kentucky | 2 | Kansas Khatri-Schile | Russell |
|
Tournament | Round | Report |
---|---|---|
Gsu | 8 | Opponent: Missouri State Bess-Rumbaugh | Judge: Atchison T - IAFIC is not nukes |
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Entry | Date |
---|---|
1NC Rd 1 GSUTournament: GSU | Round: 1 | Opponent: UGA | Judge: Rob Mills 1NC Shell - EmbodimentThe 1AC is a performance of presumed accessibility and able body privilege - any attempt to separate the and#34;contentand#34; of the 1AC from its and#34;formand#34; is a reason to vote negative – and#34;whatand#34; they have and#34;saidand#34; is just as important as and#34;howand#34; they have made it intelligible to themselves, us and youBoys 2008 (Jos, and#34;challenging the ’normal’: towards new conceptual frameworksand#34;, http://www.sowhatisnormal.co.uk/challenging) The liberal subject constituted both IN and BY the 1AC is necessarily able bodiedBreckenridge and Volger 2001 (Carol Appadurai and Candace A, and#34;The Critical Limits of Embodiment: Disability’s Criticismand#34;, Public Culture, Volume 13, Number 3, Fall 2011) Our argument is not just about physical access and disability identity – their forthcoming claims about education and fairness discount the benefit of disability consciousness by and for able bodied debatersBreckenridge and Volger 2001 (Carol Appadurai and Candace A, and#34;The Critical Limits of Embodiment: Disability’s Criticismand#34;, Public Culture, Volume 13, Number 3, Fall 2011) The body is a stock issue – it’s the both the source and method of all knowledge and meaningCreal 1999 (Lee Davis, and#34;THE and#34;DISABILITY OF THINKINGand#34; Even if you don’t believe that we have a link to the and#34;topicand#34; or and#34;planand#34; – we definitely have a link to what is happening in this room right nowBerube 2003 (Michael, and#34;Citizenship and Disability: Disability is a matter of civil rights, even if the Supreme Court doesn’t seem to agree.and#34;, http://www.alternet.org/story/15809/citizenship_and_disability) Our alternative is not to take any specific action or reject any particular policy but rather to tell a specific and particular story, the story of disability in debate – this self-narration of the embodied experience of disability is a pre-requisite to accessible and meaningful debatesCreal 1999 (Lee Davis, and#34;THE and#34;DISABILITY OF THINKINGand#34; PTXObama is pushing fast-track trade authority now – it’ll pass with bipartisan support.Scott Flaherty 9/19/13 and#34;’Fast-Track’ Power Key To Finishing Trade Deals, Obama Saysand#34; http://www.law360.com/internationaltrade/articles/469554/-fast-track-power-key-to-finishing-trade-deals-obama-says ====Changes in drone policy cause fights between Congress and the White House.==== As some in Congress are looking to limit America’s authority to kill suspected terrorists, the White House and Justice Department on Tuesday adamantly defended the administration’s authority to use unmanned drones following the release of a controversial memo on the program.¶ Fox News reports that President Obama’s advisers are also trying to tamp down concerns about the targeted killings ahead of the confirmation hearing Thursday for CIA director nominee John Brennan — the counterterrorism adviser and drone-program supporter who has come under criticism from Democrats.¶ The furor is heating up after a white paper, leaked on Monday night and dating from 2011, justifies the killing of United States citizens who hold senior positions in al-Qaida and pose an and#34;imminent threat of violent attackand#34; against America. ¶ The white paper provides some detail of the legal framework under United States and international law for the drones policy, including that the United States is at war with al-Qaida. But it has come under criticism from human rights groups for making too broad a case for killing, rather than capturing, suspected American and foreign terrorists. ¶ The report was shown to senators several weeks ago, but failed to allay their concerns.C. Internal Link - Obama’s capital is critical to passing Trade promotion authority.Politi, 5/20/13 James. Financial Times ~London (UK)~ 20 May 2013 Financial Times US economics and trade correspondent and#34;US business keen to promote ’fast track’ trade deals: Political debateand#34; Proquest A campaign has been launched to ’educate’ legislators on the benefits involved, writes, D. – Impact Passing TPA is critical to the future viability of the WTO – which will collapse now.Jeffrey Schott 6/14/13 Senior Fellow, Peterson Institute for International Economics Payoff from the World Trade Agenda Now, what are the prospects for Bali? Well, they’re not so good E. The WTO is critical to prevent nuclear extinction.Copley News Service 1999 ~December 1, 1999, lexis~ OLC CPOLC can create and eliminate executive war powersMcGinnis 1993 (John, and#34;CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BY THE EXECUTIVE IN FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND WAR POWERS: A CONSEQUENCE OF RATIONAL CHOICE IN THE SEPARATION OF POWERSand#34;, http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=421326context=lcp) Solves better and avoids the net benefitMcGinnis 1993 (John, and#34;CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BY THE EXECUTIVE IN FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND WAR POWERS: A CONSEQUENCE OF RATIONAL CHOICE IN THE SEPARATION OF POWERSand#34;, http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=421326context=lcp) | 9/28/13 |
1NC Rd 6 GSUTournament: Gsu | Round: 6 | Opponent: Emory Karthikeyan-Morrow | Judge: Quigley 1NC VaguenessGeorge 2010 (Daniel, "That Is What We Said, but This Is What We Meant: Putting the Meaning Back into Use-of-Force Legislation", George Washington Law Review, June 2010 Vol. 78 No. 4) OffThe United States federal government should require consultation in every possible circumstance prior to the use of cyber operations by President of the United States and require a prompt and full account of every significant cyber operation by the President of the United States.====Here’s the difference - The CP removes the offense/defence weapons framing. ==== ====The term cyber weapon and offensive capabilities is a self-fulfilling prophecy – analytically meaningless and creates conflict.==== ====Gotta change the language. The CP Solves .==== What strikes me as the most interesting take-away from the Economist debate is The affirmative’s constitution of security as an ideal and benevolent condition utilizes human life as a tool to calculate safety with response to a discursive ideal, not a material conditionDillon 08 (Dillon, professor of security @ Lancaster, 2008 (Michael, "Underwriting Security" Security Dialogue 32.3) This essay enframes ’risk’ as a biopolitical security technology. It explains how biopolitics Calculability results in the devaluation of human lifeDillon 99 (Michael Dillon, professor of politics and international relations at the University of Lancaster, April 1999, Political Theory, Vol. 27, No. 2, "Another Justice," p. 164-5) Quite the reverse. The subject was never a firm foundation for justice, much OffThe 1AC is a performance of presumed accessibility and able body privilege - any attempt to separate the "content" of the 1AC from its "form" is a reason to vote negative – "what" they have "said" is just as important as "how" they have made it intelligible to themselves, us and youBoys 2008 (Jos, "challenging the ’normal’: towards new conceptual frameworks", http://www.sowhatisnormal.co.uk/challenging) The liberal subject constituted both IN and BY the 1AC is necessarily able bodiedBreckenridge and Volger 2001 (Carol Appadurai and Candace A, "The Critical Limits of Embodiment: Disability’s Criticism", Public Culture, Volume 13, Number 3, Fall 2011) Our argument is not just about physical access and disability identity – their forthcoming claims about education and fairness discount the benefit of disability consciousness by and for able bodied debatersBreckenridge and Volger 2001 (Carol Appadurai and Candace A, "The Critical Limits of Embodiment: Disability’s Criticism", Public Culture, Volume 13, Number 3, Fall 2011) The body is a stock issue – it’s the both the source and method of all knowledge and meaningCreal 1999 (Lee Davis, "THE "DISABILITY OF THINKING" The concept of "war" in the 1AC is disembodiedBurgoyne 2012 (Robert, "embodiment in the war film: paradise now and the hurt locker", Journal of War and Culture Studies, Volume 5, Number 1) Even if you don’t believe that we have a link to the "topic" or "plan" – we definitely have a link to what is happening in this room right nowBerube 2003 (Michael, "Citizenship and Disability: Disability is a matter of civil rights, even if the Supreme Court doesn’t seem to agree.", http://www.alternet.org/story/15809/citizenship_and_disability) Vote negative to reject the affirmativeHolmqvist 2012 (Caroline, "Automation and ’undoing’: (re)thinking materialities and virtualities of war", Paper presented at the Millennium Annual Conference on Materialism and World Politics) CasePreemptionNo escalationMedia hypeGartzke 2012(Erik, University of California, San Diego, December 7, "The Myth of Cyberwar: Bringing War on the Internet Back Down to Earth", http://dss.ucsd.edu/~~egartzke/papers/cyberwar_12062012.pdf) A blitz of media, punditry and public pronouncements inform interested observers and policy makers No incentiveGartzke 2012(Erik, University of California, San Diego, December 7, "The Myth of Cyberwar: Bringing War on the Internet Back Down to Earth", http://dss.ucsd.edu/~~egartzke/papers/cyberwar_12062012.pdf) Even the most successful forms of cyberwar (such as cyber espionage) do not Law of Armed Conflict1) No escalation -A) Cyber attacks won’t start until war will already happen—and damage is temporary and minimalGartzke 2012(Erik, University of California, San Diego, December 7, "The Myth of Cyberwar: Bringing War on the Internet Back Down to Earth", http://dss.ucsd.edu/~~egartzke/papers/cyberwar_12062012.pdf) Beyond questions of means and motive, two basic features make cyber warfare different from Cyberwar only augments traditional warfare—it doesn’t cause conflictGartzke 2012(Erik, University of California, San Diego, December 7, "The Myth of Cyberwar: Bringing War on the Internet Back Down to Earth", http://dss.ucsd.edu/~~egartzke/papers/cyberwar_12062012.pdf) There is no reason to believe that cyberwar will be any more useful as an 2) No impact to ChinaA) interdependence checks cyber warAustin and Gady 2012(Greg, professorial fellow at the EastWest Institute and senior visiting fellow in the department of War Studies at King’s College London, and Franz-Stefan, associate and foreign policy analyst at the EastWest Institute, "Cyber Detente Between the united States and China: Shaping the Agenda", http://www.ewi.info/system/files/detente.pdf) That said, the two countries’ economies, though very different in many respects, B) No cross-domain escalationSanders 7/6 (Doug Sanders, author and journalist, "Our Computers Are Not Going to Kill Us: Cyber War is Military Fiction," http://dougsaunders.net/2013/07/our-computers-are-not-going-to-kill-us-cyber-war-is-military-fiction/) C) China NFU nowYunzhu 13 (Major General Yao Yunzhu is the director of China-America Defense Relations, Academy of Military Science, China US Focus, " China Will Not Change Its Nuclear Policy", http://www.chinausfocus.com/peace-security/china-will-not-change-its-no-first-use-policy/, April 22, 2013) First, unlike previous editions which all have the title "China’s National Defense", No major war—Deterrence and economics preventMandelbaum ’99 (Michael, American Foreign Policy Professor in the School of Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins, 2-25, Council on Foreign Relations Great Debate Series, "Is Major War Obsolete?" http://www.ciaonet.org/conf/cfr10/) Economic interdependence and democratic values preventNye ’4 (Joseph, Kennedy School of Government Dean and Professor of International Relations at Harvard, Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics, p. 20) Lack of physical capability and political will preventXintian ’4 (Yu, President of the Shanghai Institutes for International Studies, International Review, http://www.siis.org.cn/en/index.aspx) Desire for peace and development preventPan ’3 (Research fellow at the Shanghai Institutes for International Studies, SIIS Journal No. 3, http://www.siis.org.cn/en/index.aspx) ( ) Great power peaceZakaria ’9 (Fareed, PhD Poli Sci @ Harvard, Editor of Newsweek, 12/12/09, "The Secrets of Stability," Newsweek, http://www.newsweek.com/id/226425) SovlecnyAff can’t solve – patriotic hackers make crisis management impossibleOwens et al 9 Past experience strongly indicates that conflict or increased tension ¶ between two nations will result | 9/28/13 |
1NC Rd 8 GSUTournament: Gsu | Round: 8 | Opponent: Missouri State Bess-Rumbaugh | Judge: Atchison 1NCIntroduction of US Armed Forces into hostilities – is not combat systems must be boots on the ground – they don’t meet and it’s a voting issue because its not precise and explodes limits to include any potential weapons system – that destroys core negative ground and topic coherenceLorber 13 – JD Candidate @ Duke and PhD Candidate @ Penn 1NCThe 1AC is a performance of presumed accessibility and able body privilege - any attempt to separate the "content" of the 1AC from its "form" is a reason to vote negative – "what" they have "said" is just as important as "how" they have made it intelligible to themselves, us and youBoys 2008 (Jos, "challenging the ’normal’: towards new conceptual frameworks", http://www.sowhatisnormal.co.uk/challenging) The liberal subject constituted both IN and BY the 1AC is necessarily able bodiedBreckenridge and Volger 2001 (Carol Appadurai and Candace A, "The Critical Limits of Embodiment: Disability’s Criticism", Public Culture, Volume 13, Number 3, Fall 2011) The body is a stock issue – it’s the both the source and method of all knowledge and meaningCreal 1999 (Lee Davis, "THE "DISABILITY OF THINKING" The concept of "war" in the 1AC is disembodiedBurgoyne 2012 (Robert, "embodiment in the war film: paradise now and the hurt locker", Journal of War and Culture Studies, Volume 5, Number 1) Vote negative to reject the affirmativeBreckenridge and Volger 2001 (Carol Appadurai and Candace A, "The Critical Limits of Embodiment: Disability’s Criticism", Public Culture, Volume 13, Number 3, Fall 2011) 1NCUnique Link - PGS won’t survive the current budgetary climate without a new mission requirement – the aff provides this by taking nuclear options off the tableActon 9/3 (James M. Acton is a senior associate in the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment, "Silver Bullet? Asking the Right Questions About Conventional Prompt Global Strike," 9/3/13 http://carnegieendowment.org/2013/09/03/silver-bullet-asking-right-questions-about-conventional-prompt-global-strike/gkmp ) While the term "Conventional Prompt Global Strike," coined during the administration¶ of PGS Causes misclac and escalation to nuclear war – causes destination, target, and warhead ambiguity, crisis instability, won’t have necessary supporting tech, and the DoD systematically underestimates the negativesGrossman 9/3 Elaine M. Grossman, Global Security Newswire¶ September 3, 2013, "Global-Strike Arms Pose Little-Recognized Stability Risks: Report" http://www.nationaljournal.com/global-security-newswire/global-strike-arms-pose-little-recognized-stability-risks-report-20130903 A new report warns that future U.S. nonnuclear rapid-strike arms 1NCText: The United States federal judiciary should restrict the war powers authority of the President of the United States to launch a nuclear first strike into hostilities without Congressional approval.The CP solves the aff even if it reserves some power to the executive – and Congress will still be able to constrain excess presidential authority. Their authorHemesath 2000 (Paul A. Hemesath, J.D./M.S.F.S. Georgetown University Law Center, School of Foreign Service, August 2000, "Who’s Got the Button? Nuclear War Powers Uncertainty in the Post-Cold War Era," Georgetown Law Journal, lexis) A decision before the Supreme Court would provide acceptable clarity in any of the three Banning second strike bad – Kills Crisis stability causes escalation.Michael S. GERSON 2009 Research analyst at the Center for Naval Analyses, a federally funded research and development center in Alexandria, Virginia CONCEPTS OF DETERRENCE IN THE 21ST CENTURY: SOME THINGS OLD, SOME THINGS NEW NATO DEFENSE COLLEGE COLLEGE DE DEFENSE DE L’OTAN Research Division Division Recherche NATO AND 21 st CENTURY DETERRENCE Damage limitation doesn’t inspire first strike – opponents can’t gain superiority.Keith B. Payne 2008 The Great American Gamble: Deterrence Theory and Practice from the Cold War to the Twenty First Century National Institute for Public Policy Department of Defense and Strategic Studies Missouri State University p. 253 Command and control key.Defense Science Board (DSB) 2006. The DSB is a Federal Advisory Committee established to provide independent advice to the Secretary of Defense Office of the Under Secretary of Defense For Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics December 2006 Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Nuclear Capabilities Report Summary There is also concern in U.S. nuclear command and control capabilities. AT - Hegemony1 Heg not solve war –A. No threats require primacy and other factors ensure security.Friedman and Preble 10 (Benjamin Friedman is a research fellow in defense and homeland security studies at the Cato Institute, Christopher Preble is director of foreign policy studies at the Cato Institute, Budgetary Savings from Military Restraint, September 22, 2010 Cato Policy Analysis No. 667 September 23, 2010 http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/PA667.pdf B. No war – States have an incentive to avoid it.Zakaria 08 (Fareed Zakaria, editor of Newsweek International, 2008, The Post-American World, p. 244) 2 Heg inevitable.Goldberg 11 ( January 28 2011 "America’s China Syndrome" AEIPPR American Enterprise Institute For Public Policy Research http://www.aei.org/article/103022) 3 Aging crisis solves heg.Haas 7 (Mark L Haas, Assistant Professor of Political Science at Duquesne University, "A Geriatric Peace? The Future of U.S. Power in a World of Aging Populations" International Security, Vol. 32, No. 1, Summer, p 112-147 (EBSCO)) SV AT - Accidents1. Risk of backlash prevents accidental warWaltz 95 (Kenneth, Prof of Poli Sci @ Berkely, Ph.D in Poli Sci from Columbia U, The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: A debate, pp. 111) 2 Nuclear accidents wouldn’t escalateWaltz 95 (Kenneth, Prof of Poli Sci @ Berkely, Ph.D in Poli Sci from Columbia U, The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: A debate, pp. 93-94) 3. No theft and no impactGray 9—Associate Note and Comment Editor, Arizona State Law Journal. J.D. Candidate, Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law at Arizona State University, 2009; B.S. Political Science, Arizona State University, 2005 (John, Comment: Choosing the Nuclear Option: The Case for a Strong Regulatory Response to Encourage Nuclear Energy Development, Spring 2009, 41 Ariz. St. L.J. 315, Lexis) Not only does the material’s ~*335~ radioactivity prevent theft, but also its 4. Threat of international response deters nuclear terrorUmana 11 – Felipe Umana is a contributor to Foreign Policy In Focus, from the Institute for Policy Studies. August 17, 2011, "Loose Nukes: Real Threat?" http://www.fpif.org/articles/loose_nukes_real_threat | 9/28/13 |
New Debateability CardsTournament: Kentucky | Round: 2 | Opponent: Kansas Khatri-Schile | Judge: Russell The body is always already a prior question – voting negative destabilizes the disembodied understanding of debateCliford 2012 (Stacy, and#34;making disability public in deliberative democracyand#34;, Contemporary Political Thoery (2012) 11, 211-228. Doi:10.1057/cpt.2011.11) Haller’s experience reveals the pervasive… AND … debates and instills increased attentiveness. ====Voting negative tells a different story==== AND … the means to redress these faults. This is a story about NormanCreal 1999 (Lee Davis, and#34;THE and#34;DISABILITY OF THINKINGand#34; AND … sleep with an iron brace on his leg. Norm is part of the story that is the topicBerube 2003 (Michael, and#34;Citizenship and Disability: Disability is a matter of civil rights, even if the Supreme Court doesn’t seem to agree.and#34;, http://www.alternet.org/story/15809/citizenship_and_disability) AND …is to say, for the good of all of us. The 1AC’s absence of and#34;researchand#34; on and by disability erases the lived experience of disabled subjectsLinton 98 AND … the data rarely acknowledges this omission. | 10/5/13 |
Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
---|---|---|---|
9/28/13 | sespring@uhedu | ||
9/28/13 | sespring@uhedu | ||
9/28/13 | sespring@uhedu | ||
10/5/13 | sespring@uhedu |
Air Force
Amherst
Appalachian State
Arizona State
Army
Augustana
Bard
Baylor
Binghamton
Boston College
Capital
CSU Long Beach
CSU Northridge
CSU Sacramento
CUNY
Cal Berkeley
Cal Lutheran
Cal Poly SLO
Case Western
Central Florida
Central Oklahoma
Chico
Clarion
Columbia
Concordia
Cornell
Dartmouth
Denver
Drexel-Swarthmore
ENMU
East Los Angeles College
Eastern Washington
Emory
Emporia
Fayetteville State
Florida
Florida Int'l
Florida State
Fordham
Fresno State
Fullerton
Gainesville State
George Mason
George Washington
Georgetown
Georgia
Georgia State
Georgia Tech
Gonzaga
Harvard
Houston
Idaho State
Illinois
Illinois State
Indiana
Iowa
Irvine/SFSU
James Madison
John Carroll
Johns Hopkins
Johnson County CC
KCKCC
Kansas
Kansas State
Kentucky
LA City College
Lakeland
Lewis-Clark State College
Liberty
Lindenwood
Los Rios
Louisville
Loyola
Macalester
Marist
Mary Washington
Mercer
Methodist
Miami FL
Miami OH
Michigan
Michigan State
Minnesota
Mission
Missouri State
NYU
Navy
New School
North Texas
Northern Iowa
Northwestern
Notre Dame
Ohio Wesleyan
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pepperdine
Piedmont
Pittsburgh
Portland State
Princeton
Puget Sound
Redlands
Richmond
Rochester
Rutgers
Samford
San Diego State
San Francisco State
Santa Clara
South Florida St Pete
Southern Methodist
Southwestern
Stanford
Texas State
Texas-Austin
Texas-Dallas
Texas-San Antonio
Texas-Tyler
Towson
Trinity
U Chicago
UCLA
UDC-CC
UMKC
UNLV
USC
Utah
Vanderbilt
Vermont
Virginia Tech
Wake Forest
Wash U (St. Louis)
Washburn
Washington
Wayne State
Weber
West Georgia
West Virginia
Western Connecticut
Whitman
Wichita State
Wisconsin Oshkosh
Wyoming