General Actions:
Wiki: opencaselist13
▼:
Document Index
»
Space: Wyoming
▼:
Document Index
»
Page: Jones-Graziano Aff
Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Video | Edit/Delete |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOB MUKAI COLLEGE CLASSIC AT WEBER STATE | 1 | JCCC Secor and Warren | Joel Salcedo |
| ||||
Httpwwwweberdebatecomvalbrowningcollegerrhtm | 3 | Oregon Viales-Geddes | Cheek |
| ||||
Httpwwwweberdebatecomvalbrowningcollegerrhtm | 6 | Weber State Soper-Shackelford | Stout |
|
Tournament | Round | Report |
---|---|---|
BOB MUKAI COLLEGE CLASSIC AT WEBER STATE | 1 | Opponent: JCCC Secor and Warren | Judge: Joel Salcedo Affirmative read Drone Courts in 1ac Framework and A2 K in 2ac Negative read K in all speeches |
Httpwwwweberdebatecomvalbrowningcollegerrhtm | 3 | Opponent: Oregon Viales-Geddes | Judge: Cheek Aff versus Security |
Httpwwwweberdebatecomvalbrowningcollegerrhtm | 6 | Opponent: Weber State Soper-Shackelford | Judge: Stout Aff versus Ban Drones |
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Entry | Date |
---|---|
1ACTournament: BOB MUKAI COLLEGE CLASSIC AT WEBER STATE | Round: 1 | Opponent: JCCC Secor and Warren | Judge: Joel Salcedo 1ACPlanThe United States federal government should substantially increase statutory restrictions on the war powers authority of the President of the United States by establishing a federal counterterrorism oversight court with jurisdiction over targeted killing orders.TerrorExpansive use of targeted killing causes blowback, collateral damage, and operational errors— new guidelines keyGuiora, 2012 Exclusive executive decision making in drone strikes makes groupthink and errors inevitableChebab, 2012 Impact is nuclear warWright, 2003 Judicial review solves groupthinkChebab, 2012 Plan is key to effective drone use—solves blowbackMasood 13 Global terror threat is high and attacks against the US are immanentETN, 9-26-13 And Nuclear terrorism is feasible—-high risk of theft and attacks escalateVladimir Z. Dvorkin ’12 Major General (retired), doctor of technical sciences, professor, and senior fellow at the Center for International Security of the Institute of World Economy and International Relations of the Russian Academy of Sciences. The Center participates in the working group of the U.S.-Russia Initiative to Prevent Nuclear Terrorism, 9/21/12, "What Can Destroy Strategic Stability: Nuclear Terrorism is a Real Threat," belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/publication/22333/what_can_destroy_strategic_stability.html Nuclear terrorism causes extinctionMorgan 9 Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Yongin Campus – South Korea (Dennis, Futures, November, "World on fire: two scenarios of the destruction of human civilization and possible extinction of the human race," Science Direct), accessed 9-16-2011,WYO/JF Current terror blowback results in bioterrorNader 11 Causes extinctionOchs 2002 Newest developments take out all impact defenseJordans, 2011 Drone ProlifDrone Prolif NowZenko, 2013 The US has a narrow window of opportunity to shape drone proliferation, only US reform based on transparency and restraint will solveZenko, 2013 Establishing a precedent of transparency and accountability spills over globally– a non-executive framework is keyBrooks 13 (Rosa, Professor of Law – Georgetown University Law Center, Bernard L. Schwartz Senior Fellow – New America Foundation, Former Counselor to the Undersecretary of Defense for Policy – Department of Defense, "The Constitutional and Counterterrorism Implications of Targeted Killing," Testimony Before the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Human Rights, 4-23, http://www.judiciary.senate.gov/pdf/04-23-13BrooksTestimony.pdf-http://www.judiciary.senate.gov/pdf/04-23-13BrooksTestimony.pdf) And, independent courts are key—only checks on unilateral executive power can provide legitimacy to the United States and credibility to our counterterror policies, finally, the selection process for drone courts solves all disads to judgesChebab, 2012 The plan solves international norms- US can shape and limit drone prolif and provide the ability to apply diplomatic pressureZenko, 2013 Unfettered drone prolif causes deterrence crises that leads to nuclear conflictBoyle, 13 ~"The costs and consequences of drone warfare", MICHAEL J. BOYLE, International Affairs 89: 1 (2013) 1–29, assistant professor of political science at LaSalle University~ China’s drone prolif causes regional war—multiple flashpointsStandaert, 2012 SCS conflict causes nuke warGlaser 12 Bonnie S., Senior Fellow – Center for Strategic and International Studies, "Armed Clash in the South China Sea," CFR, April, http://www.cfr.org/east-asia/armed-clash-south-china-sea/p27883 Senkaku Conflict goes nuclearJohn Blaxland 13, Senior Fellow at the Strategic and Defence Studies Centre, the Australian National University, and Rikki Kersten, Professor of modern Japanese political history in the School of International, Political and Strategic Studies at the College of Asia and the Pacific, the Australian National University, 2/13/13, "Escalating territorial tension in East Asia echoes Europe’s descent into world war," http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2013/02/13/escalating-territorial-tension-in-east-asia-echoes-europes-descent-into-world-war/ SolvencyThe creation of a federal counterterror oversight court solves all problems with the targeted killing program and all disads to judicial reviewPlaw, 2007 | 11/23/13 |
1AR- Weber Round 3Tournament: Httpwwwweberdebatecomvalbrowningcollegerrhtm | Round: 3 | Opponent: Oregon Viales-Geddes | Judge: Cheek 1ARKPan concedes that studies of China can be effective – they have to prove a specific link to our scholarshipChengxin Pan, Australian National University, 2004, "Discourses of China in International Relations: A Study in Western Theory as (IR) Practice, Doctoral Thesis, p.35 Second, Predictions of terrorism are true- their critique replicates the logic preceding the attacks on BritainJones ’6 (The commentariat and discourse failure: language and atrocity in Cool Britannia International Aff airs 82: 6 (2006) 1077–1100 © 2006 The Author(s). Journal Compilation © 2006 Blackwell Publishing Ltd/The Royal Institute of International Aff airs DAVID MARTIN JONES AND M. L. R. SMITH ) | 11/23/13 |
2AC- Weber Round 1 Debate InterdependenceTournament: BOB MUKAI COLLEGE CLASSIC AT WEBER STATE | Round: 1 | Opponent: JCCC Secor and Warren | Judge: Joel Salcedo 2ACFrameworkFirst, Our Interpretation: The resolution asks the question of desirability of USFG action. The Role of ballot is to say yes or no to the action and outcomes of the plan.Second, is reasons to prefer:A. Aff Choice, any other framework or role of the ballot moots 9 minutes of the 1acB. It is predictable, the resolution demands USFG actionEngaging the state is key and good to the ability of citizens to break into the project of solving global challenges: Engagement relies on an existing state and refocuses on citizen participation that solve for war as well as environmental and social challengesSassen 2009 Using state power for a new global politics These post-1980s trends towards a Voter for competitive equity—prefer our interpretation, it allows both teams to compete, other roles of the ballot are arbitrary and self servingDebate InterdependencyWorking from within but against the state is key to success of feminist struggles- the state is multifaceted and we reform aspects of the state to fight against dominant discourses and masculine policiesRai 02 As we saw in chapter 5, for feminists, the nation-state has You should take our impacts seriously – the prevalence of dualistic thinking means first priority is preventing a nuclear warDavion 96 As I stated earlier, I do not think that taking ecological feminist critiques seriously
| 11/23/13 |
2AC- Weber Round 3Tournament: Httpwwwweberdebatecomvalbrowningcollegerrhtm | Round: 3 | Opponent: Oregon Viales-Geddes | Judge: Cheek 2ACFrameworkFirst, Our Interpretation: The resolution asks the question of desirability of USFG action. The Role of ballot is to say yes or no to the action and outcomes of the plan.Second, is reasons to prefer:A. Aff Choice, any other framework or role of the ballot moots 9 minutes of the 1acB. It is predictable, the resolution demands USFG actionEngaging the state is key and good to the ability of citizens to break into the project of solving global challenges: Engagement relies on an existing state and refocuses on citizen participation that solve for war as well as environmental and social challengesSassen 2009 Using state power for a new global politics These post-1980s trends towards a Voter for competitive equity—prefer our interpretation, it allows both teams to compete, other roles of the ballot are arbitrary and self servingCP1. Drone Courts key – Congress should establish Judicial Review, it is the best check on the president, all other mechanisms insufficientBazzle 12 Judicial review is essential to judicial independenceGerber, 2007 Solves global wars,Epstien et al, 2007 DA1st, Pres powers low now—Syria decision undermined Obama’s presidential powersNather and Palmer, 9-1-13 2nd, Restrictions inevitable—-only a question of whether they are deliberate or haphazardBenjamin Wittes 9, senior fellow and research director in public law at the Brookings Institution, is the author of Law and the Long War: The Future of Justice in the Age of Terror and is also a member of the Hoover Institution’s Task Force on National Security and Law, "Legislating the War on Terror: An Agenda for Reform", November 3, Book, p. 17 KSecurity is inevitable—rejecting it causes the state to become more interventionist, flipping the impactMcCormack 10 Shifting away from the security framework causes conflict and causes intervention – only the perm gives political content to rightsMcCormack 10 Scenario creation isn’t the same as threat construction, it’s crucial to see if policies are a good idea and reduce the risk of nuclear war.Darryl S.L.Jarvis - School of Economics 26 Political Science, U. of Sydney - 2K3 "Political Risk in International Relations: Empirical Experiences and Conceptual Approaches" School of Economics and Political Science, Working Papers No impact – threat construction isn’t sufficient to cause warsKaufman, Prof Poli Sci and IR – U Delaware, ’9 Risk in the international system is inevitable—the goal should be to weigh the impacts of action vs inaction in the face of a particular threat.Harvard Nuclear Study Group 83 (Living with Nuclear Weapons, p.16-7) Threat construction is good – it allows us to anticipate and prevent dangerJoseph Berke, Found. And Dir. Arbours Crisis Centre, 1998, Even Paranoids Have Enemies, p. 5-6 Threats real—default to expert consensusKnudsen 1– PoliSci Professor at Sodertorn (Olav, Post-Copenhagen Security Studies, Security Dialogue 32:3) Confronting threats early prevents escalation—WWII proves.Yoon 03 – Professor of International Relations at Seoul National University; former Foreign Minister of South Korea – 2003(Young-Kwan, "Introduction: Power Cycle Theory and the Practice of International Relations", International Political Science Review 2003; vol. 24; p. 7-8) Promotion of security is an ethical responsibility of government. Total security is impossible but limited security avoids a hell on earth.Elshtain ’3 (Jean Bethke, Prof. Social and Pol. Ethics – U. Chicago, "Just War Against Terror: The Burden of American Power in a Violent World", p. 46-48) | 11/23/13 |
2AC- Weber Round 6Tournament: Httpwwwweberdebatecomvalbrowningcollegerrhtm | Round: 6 | Opponent: Weber State Soper-Shackelford | Judge: Stout 2ACTerrorDebating the law teaches us how to make it better – rejection is worseTodd Hedrick, Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Michigan State University, Sept 2012, Democratic Constitutionalism as Mediation: The Decline and Recovery of an Idea in Critical Social Theory, Constellations Volume 19, Issue 3, pages 382–400 FrameworkFirst, Our Interpretation: The resolution asks the question of desirability of USFG action. The Role of ballot is to say yes or no to the action and outcomes of the plan.Second, is reasons to prefer:A. Aff Choice, any other framework or role of the ballot moots 9 minutes of the 1acB. It is predictable, the resolution demands USFG actionEngaging the state is key and good to the ability of citizens to break into the project of solving global challenges: Engagement relies on an existing state and refocuses on citizen participation that solve for war as well as environmental and social challengesSassen 2009 Using state power for a new global politics These post-1980s trends towards a Voter for competitive equity—prefer our interpretation, it allows both teams to compete, other roles of the ballot are arbitrary and self servingKA risk of nuclear war precludes any deontological framework – uncertainty mandates that every policy decision must be able to guarantee the continued existence of the human race, and to ignore this possibility is in itself immoral and unjustified.Schell, 2000 Double bind – either no human lives are equally valuable, which forces them to prove why the lives they save are worth it, or all human life is equally valuable, which necessitates utilitarianism.Harsanyi, 82 The threat of extinction mandates consequentialism.Bok 88 The alternative cannot solve any of the aff’s impact- it’s assumptions are incommensurable with the aff’s critical attitude.Nadesan 99 XODrone Courts key – Congress should establish Judicial Review, it is the best check on the president, all other mechanisms insufficientBazzle 12 DA1st, Debates on drone courts now—legislation being written and proposed—thumps the disadWolverton, 3-12-13 2nd, Link turn drone courts popular in congress—particularly with Feinstein and KingHosenball, 2-8-2013 Feinstein key to agenda- can wrangle in both partiesTate 13 3rd, Link turn – plan popular in congressJakes 13 Obama making concessions to passing immigration reform now-even if it is piece meal it still solvesMatthews 11-20 Immigration reform is likely-Obama working with the GOP and its gaining supportFelde 11-20 Boehner is on board with Obamas new approach to immigrationWashington Post 11-21 Obama PC persuading Boehner now-talks are happening and momentum is buildingFoley 11-21 | 11/24/13 |
Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
---|---|---|---|
11/23/13 | nategraziano@gmailcom | ||
11/24/13 | nategraziano@gmailcom |
Air Force
Amherst
Appalachian State
Arizona State
Army
Augustana
Bard
Baylor
Binghamton
Boston College
Capital
CSU Long Beach
CSU Northridge
CSU Sacramento
CUNY
Cal Berkeley
Cal Lutheran
Cal Poly SLO
Case Western
Central Florida
Central Oklahoma
Chico
Clarion
Columbia
Concordia
Cornell
Dartmouth
Denver
Drexel-Swarthmore
ENMU
East Los Angeles College
Eastern Washington
Emory
Emporia
Fayetteville State
Florida
Florida Int'l
Florida State
Fordham
Fresno State
Fullerton
Gainesville State
George Mason
George Washington
Georgetown
Georgia
Georgia State
Georgia Tech
Gonzaga
Harvard
Houston
Idaho State
Illinois
Illinois State
Indiana
Iowa
Irvine/SFSU
James Madison
John Carroll
Johns Hopkins
Johnson County CC
KCKCC
Kansas
Kansas State
Kentucky
LA City College
Lakeland
Lewis-Clark State College
Liberty
Lindenwood
Los Rios
Louisville
Loyola
Macalester
Marist
Mary Washington
Mercer
Methodist
Miami FL
Miami OH
Michigan
Michigan State
Minnesota
Mission
Missouri State
NYU
Navy
New School
North Texas
Northern Iowa
Northwestern
Notre Dame
Ohio Wesleyan
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pepperdine
Piedmont
Pittsburgh
Portland State
Princeton
Puget Sound
Redlands
Richmond
Rochester
Rutgers
Samford
San Diego State
San Francisco State
Santa Clara
South Florida St Pete
Southern Methodist
Southwestern
Stanford
Texas State
Texas-Austin
Texas-Dallas
Texas-San Antonio
Texas-Tyler
Towson
Trinity
U Chicago
UCLA
UDC-CC
UMKC
UNLV
USC
Utah
Vanderbilt
Vermont
Virginia Tech
Wake Forest
Wash U (St. Louis)
Washburn
Washington
Wayne State
Weber
West Georgia
West Virginia
Western Connecticut
Whitman
Wichita State
Wisconsin Oshkosh
Wyoming