Tournament: Wake Forest | Round: 5 | Opponent: Pittsburgh BC | Judge: Evans
*Opponent Summary*
They do not read a specific advocacy statement  but they defend the ballot as a signal of refusal to support institutionalized racism specifically the War on Drugs and the targeted killing/detention of "black and brown bodies".
They say that the affirmative results in discussions within the debate community about these issues. They did not defend community changed but said the discussions were valuable and necessary in order to start deconstructing these issues.
They read an "extermination" impact but did not go for it.
They also had a scripted conversation between them about one debater's mother being released from prison and the other debater's brother's death. They defended this as a narrative that helped inform discussion.
*It was read on paper, this is the most I can remember*