C'mon. You've entered info for 31 rounds, and only entered cites for 15? That's only 48.4%. Open Source is NOT a replacement for good disclosure practices.
Tournament
Round
Report
Fullerton
2
Opponent: Wayne State JS | Judge: Jacob Thompson
Where is Lee Quinn
Kentucky
1
Opponent: Northwestern WW | Judge: Gliniecki
Geography Affirmative Sovereignty and Drone Failure Advantages
Kentucky
5
Opponent: Towson JR | Judge: L Shook
Shaw Affirmative
NDT
1
Opponent: Fresno HT | Judge: Herndon, Scott Packer, Poaps
1ac - Knowledge Coalitions 1nc - Anti Blackness Case 2nc - Anti Blackness Link and Impact 1nr - Anti Blackness Alt 2nr - Anti Blackness Case
New Aff- The United States federal government should increase statutory restrictions on the President of the United States war power authority to introduce naval forces into hostilities by codifying the appropriate articles of the Law of the Sea Treaty Adv 1- South China Sea Adv 2- Arctic- Arctic War Biod Resource Wars
NDT
7
Opponent: Georgia CS | Judge: Lyle, Polin, Norris
Same 1AC as R6 2NR- Defund CP and Patent Reform
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Cites
Entry
Date
1AC- LOST- NDT Round 4
Tournament: NDT | Round: 4 | Opponent: Northwestern MV | Judge: Young, Wunderlich, Arnett 1AC Plan Text Plan: The United States federal government should increase statutory restrictions on the President of the United States’ war power authority to introduce naval forces into hostilities by codifying the appropriate articles of the Law of the Sea Treaty.
Contention 1- China South China sea conflict coming now- naval disputes- firebrand nationalist are taking control of Chinese foreign policy Smith 14 (Jeff is the director of South Asia Programs and the Kraemer Strategy Fellow at the American Foreign Policy Council in Washington, D.C., 1/15, “Drawing a Red Line for China”, http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/world-report/2014/01/15/us-must-draw-red-line-for-china-in-the-western-pacific) In recent months, the world's attention has been focused on China's provocative behavior in AND S. to be a firewall against Chinese aggression in the Western Pacific. No defense- nuclear escalation is guaranteed Klare 13 -- (Michael, professor of peace and world security studies at Hampshire College, “The Next War”, Realclearworld.com, January 23, 2013, http://www.realclearworld.com/articles/2013/01/23/the_next_war_100500.html) Don't look now, but conditions are deteriorating in the western Pacific. Things are AND planet will look with sadness and horror on the failure of everyone involved. That goes nuclear Lowther ‘13 (William Lowther, Staff Rreporter in Washington, “Taiwan could spark nuclear war: report”, http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2013/03/16/2003557211, March 16, 2013)
Taiwan is the most likely potential crisis that could trigger a nuclear war between China AND uncertain endeavor, could be especially difficult in any conflict,” it says. No self-fulfilling prophecy Blumenthal et al ‘11 (Dan Blumenthal, current commissioner and former vice chairman of the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, Mark Stokes, Michael Mazza, 9/6/11, “Avoiding Armageddon with China” http://shadow.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2011/09/06/avoiding_armageddon_with_china?wpisrc=obinsite)
The balancing and hedging strategy should involve options to avoid what Traub rightfully describes as AND quo. Not doing so, we fear, would lead to Armageddon.
Contention 2- Arctic
Scenario one is border conflict Arctic border disputes go nuclear Wallace and Staples 10 (Michael Wallace and Steven Staples. *Professor Emeritus at the University of British Columbia and President of the Rideau Institute in Ottawa “Ridding the Arctic of Nuclear Weapons: A Task Long Overdue,”http:www.arcticsecurity.org/docs/arctic-nuclear-report-web.pdf) The fact is, the Arctic is becoming a zone of increased military competition. AND -political/economic significance of the Arctic because of climate change.” 62 Realism defines these energy escalations Stephan et al. ‘11 (Hannes R. Stephan, John Vogler, and Fariborz Zelli, “Energy Security and Climate Security: Synergy or Conflict?”, Paper presented at the Third Global International Studies Conference (17-20 August 2011, Porto, Portugal), August 17-20, 2011)
Historically, realist theoretical assumptions have dominated thinking on energy security. Widespread recognition of AND the costs – could achieve a degree of autarchy in this sector too.
Scenario two is the Environment Arctic overfishing leads to arctic cod extinction- they are a keystone species PEW 10 (Environmental group studying northern oceans, “COMMERCIAL FISHING”, http://www.oceansnorth.org/commercial-fishing) Fortunately, the North American Arctic has largely been spared this legacy of overfishing, AND Conservation Alliance (organization representing 60 percent of Bering Sea Commercial fishing industry) Keystone species loss results in an avalanche affect- collapses overall biod Wooldridge 09, Frosty. Guest lecturer at Cornell University. “Our troubled country; species extinction” March 16 2009 http://www.examiner.com/x-3515-Denver-Political-Issues-Examiner~y2009m3d16-Our-troubled-country-species-extinction What might be the optimum number of extinct species that would fall short of the AND moves forward in this century. What causes it? The human race!
That outweighs your impacts- guarantees extinction and is irreversible Chen 2k—Professor of Law and Vance K. Opperman Research Scholar, University of Minnesota Law School (Jim, Globalization and Its Losers, Winter 2000, 9 Minn. J. Global Trade 157, Lexis) Ellipses in original
Conscious decisions to allow the extinction of a species or the destruction of an entire AND Homo sapiens -- in ten million years, perhaps a hundred million. 348 Causes risks food wars Roughhead 11 – US Navy Four Star Admiral (Gary, quoted in “Changes in the Arctic: Background and Issues for Congress”, 6/15/12; original statement made 6/20/11; http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41153.pdf)//AB The U.S. Navy’s interests in the Arctic are not new, of AND and when to build forces capable and competent for the harsh northern climes.
Those escalate CRIBB 2010 (Julian, Julian Cribb is a science communicator, journalist and editor AND crisis and what we can do to avoid it,” p. 26) This is the most likely means by which the coming famine will affect all citizens AND widening gap between food and energy supplies and peoples' need to secure them. Independently- Arctic ecosystem collapse leads to extinction WWF 2010 (December 1, 2010 “Drilling for Oil in the Arctic: Too Soon, Too Risky” World Wildlife Fund http://www.worldwildlife.org/what/wherewework/arctic/WWFBinaryitem18711.pdf) Planetary Keystone The Arctic and the subarctic regions surrounding it are important for many reasons AND of climate change, the Arctic is a keystone ecosystem for the entire planet Neglect of the environment causes extinction- some management key Soule ‘95 (Michael E., Professor and Chair of Environmental Studies, UC-Santa Cruz, REINVITING NATURE? RESPONSES TO POSTMODERN DECONSTRUCTION, Eds: Michael E. Soule and Gary Lease, p. 159-160)
Should We Actively Manage Wildlands and Wild Waters? The decision has already been made AND So if we must manage, where do we look for ethical guidance?
Contention 3- Solvency Solves China- Having a seat at EEZ disputes is key to solve China and freedom of navigation laws solves the reason for escalation- codification independently solves Asian arms races Glaser 12 (Bonnie S. Glaser, Senior Fellow, Center for Strategic and International Studies, April, “Armed Clash in the South China Sea”, http://www.cfr.org/world/armed-clash-south-china-sea/p27883) The risk of conflict in the South China Sea is significant. China, Taiwan AND and global issues and more tightly integrate China into the prevailing international system. There are no alt causes- EEZ disputes necessary and sufficient to prevent conflict- SCS resolution is key to overall LOST credibility Bower and Poling 12 (Ernest Z- Senior Adviser and Sumitro Chair for Southeast Asia Studies CSIS, Gregory B- Fellow, Sumitro Chair for Southeast Asia Studies and Pacific Partners Initiative CSIS, May 25, “Advancing the National Interests of the United States: Ratification of the Law of the Sea”, http://csis.org/publication/advancing-national-interests-united-states-ratification-law-sea) The credibility of the United States in the Asia Pacific is at stake on a AND is more like the competitive free-for-all of the nineteenth. Specifically- China is claiming it’s EEZ policies through Article 301 of LOST David 10 (Conrad- Captain US Navy, “Lawfare in the Near Seas: How China’s Maritime Claims Impact Regional Security”, pdf) The PRC often cites the provisions of UNCLOS that it feels are to the coastal AND 301 of the Convention, but also a violation of Article 300.” 31 Codification is key to prevent ambiguity over article 301- US lead key David 10 (Conrad- Captain US Navy, “Lawfare in the Near Seas: How China’s Maritime Claims Impact Regional Security”, pdf) Lastly, while it has long operated within its dictates of the law of the AND by freedom loving nations to preserve freedoms of navigation and overflight going forward. Solves Arctic disputes- Codification is key to resolve Arctic border and Northwest Passage sovereignty disputes, overfishing, and arctic ecosystem collapse Huebert 9 (Rob- Associate Professor, Department of Political Science¶ University of Calgary, May, “THE RELUCTANT¶ ARCTIC POWER”, pdf) The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) is the AND could soon¶ collapse. It is unclear how to resolve the situation. It’s reverse casual- our refusal to codify navigational provisions increases Arctic aggression Smith 11Reginald, Militray Professor in National Security Studies, Colonel, Masters in National Security and strategic Studies from U.S. Naval War College, "The Arctic A New Partnership Paradigm or Next 'Cold War'?", 2011, pdf The significance of the declaration is paramount to cooperation in that UNCLOS provides the international AND in the region are those available through military collaboration of the Arctic nations.
Plan: The United States federal government should increase statutory restrictions on the President of the United States’ war power authority to introduce naval forces into hostilities by codifying the appropriate articles of the Law of the Sea Treaty.
LOST Codification is key to credibility- voluntary adherence makes your DA’s non-unique, and the executive CP is the status quo Glaser 12 (Bonnie S. Glaser, Senior Fellow, Center for Strategic and International Studies, April, “Armed Clash in the South China Sea”, http://www.cfr.org/world/armed-clash-south-china-sea/p27883) First, the United States should ratify UNCLOS; though it voluntarily adheres to its AND rights, and generally advance U.S. economic and strategic interests. The plan adopts a Madisonian approach to international treaties- allows us to get the seat at LOST tribunal discussions over navigational rights, but doesn’t bind us into the bad parts of treaties Kyl 12 (Jon- United States Senator, June 4, “The Perils of Global Governance¶ Jon Kyl¶ United States Senator¶ Conference on Global Governance and the Challenge to the U.S. Constitution¶ American Enterprise Institute”, pdf) I want to emphasize that this view does not arise out of any aversion on AND contributing its practices and legal opinions on the law of¶ the sea. The plan is the necessary starting point to resolve coastal states concerns and remedy EEZ disputes- total ratification isn’t needed Beckman and Davenport 12 (Robert Beckman is the Director, Centre for International Law (CIL)¶ and Associate Professor, Faculty of Law, National University of¶ Singapore (NUS), Singapore; Tara Davenport is a Research Fellow,¶ Centre for International Law (CIL), Faculty of Law, National¶ University of Singapore (NUS), Singapore, May, “Securing the Ocean for the Next Generation”, pdf) However, it is also fair to say that some coastal States such as Brazil AND military activities, such as reconnaissance on naval assets or coastal¶ defenses.
3/29/14
1AC- Zones Affirmative- Texas
Tournament: Texas | Round: 8 | Opponent: Georgetown BL | Judge: David Cram H Same as Round 2 Texas/ Harvard zones of hostilities affirmative
2/9/14
2AC Case- NDT Round 7
Tournament: NDT | Round: 7 | Opponent: Georgia CS | Judge: Lyle, Polin, Norris 2AC- Circumvention He doesn’t have to circumvent- they say yes Doesn’t assume congress steps up when presidents violate oversight- empirically proven Ettinger, 3-28 – former Ambassador, lecturer, insider on US-Israel relations Yoram, "Congressional muscle and US foreign policy," Israel Hayom, 3-28-14, www.israelhayom.com/site/newsletter_opinion.php?id=7879, accessed 3-28-14
Contrary to conventional wisdom, the inherently pro-Israel Congress possesses the muscle to AND , expanding U.S.-Israel strategic cooperation, despite presidential opposition. Obama strictly adheres to legal policy- status quo policy is firmly backed by legal grounding- their evidence doesn’t assume Congressional change Goldsmith ’12 Jack Goldsmith is a Harvard Law professor and a member of the Hoover Task Force on National Security and Law. He served in the Bush administration as assistant attorney general in charge of the Office of Legal Counsel, “Fire When Ready,” 3-19-12, http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2012/03/19/fire_when_ready?page=full, March 19, 2012
When the Obama administration made the decision to kill Awlaki, it did not rely AND inclination to do so, and it appears to support the current arrangement. Pak
It is generally believed in the West that military action can resolve the terrorism problem AND standing in the international arena in turn increasing the prospects of such support.
AT: Drone Proliferation Inevitable Even if prolif is inevitable, the plan sends a signal of norms of restraint that solve war Roberts ’13 (Kirstin Roberts, News Editor for National Journal and was news editor and deputy bureau chief for Reuters’ Washington bureau, “When the Whole World Has Drones”, http://www.nationaljournal.com/magazine/when-the-whole-world-has-drones-20130321, March 23, 2013) A slim aircraft glided through Israeli airspace, maintaining low altitude and taking a winding AND operations manual for other nations but a legal and moral one as well.
3/30/14
2AC Courts CP- NDT Round 7
Tournament: NDT | Round: 7 | Opponent: Georgia CS | Judge: Lyle, Polin, Norris Judicial Doesn’t solve 1) Doesn’t solve binding- that’s 1AC Webb means it doesn’t solve international precedent Webb ’13 (Jim Webb is a former U.S. senator from Virginia and served as Secretary of the Navy in the Reagan administration, http://www.jameswebb.com/articles/natlinterest-congabdication.html, March/April Edition 2013)
Unless Americans accept that we have by fiat devolved into a political system where the AND America is united and not acting merely at the discretion of one individual. 2) Congress hand on the trigger key Woods ’12 (Chris Woods, won the Martha Gellhorn Prize for Journalism in 2013, Journalist for The Bureau Investigates and Salon, “Pakistani objection to US drones puts ‘nations at war’, says Democrat”, http://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/2012/06/29/pakistani-objection-to-us-drones-puts-nations-at-war-says-leading-democrat/, June 29, 2012)
President Obama’s continued bombing of Pakistan, despite Islamabad’s repeated calls for the CIA to AND we had officially adopted as our own and cherished throughout the years.’
the CP drains the solicitor general’s capital and spills over – best studies prove and LT politics Wohlfarth, ‘9 Patrick C. Wohlfarth University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, The Journal of AND appeared in the American Journal of Political Science and The Journal of Politics.)
The solicitor general (S.G.), as the executive branch’s chief lawyer on AND as well as the longterm integrity of the S.G.’s of?ce
as an institution. The recent controversy surrounding the ?ring of several U. AND success of the United States as a litigant beginning with Reagan’s solicitors general. That’s key to solve warming and pollution – CSPAR rulings are key By Emily Atkin 12-9 “4 Reasons The Supreme Court Might Want To Uphold The EPA’s Cross-State Air Pollution Rule” December 9, 2013 at 5:00 pm http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2013/12/09/3039061/4-reasons-supreme-court-cross-state-air-pollution-rule/
Those states that create large amounts of pollution are called “upwind” states, AND the federal government has the flexibility it needs to address genuinely national problems.”
Congress Addon- Groupthink Checks on the executive key to solve groupthink Chehab, 12 Ahmad, Georgetown University Law Center, Retrieving the Role of Accountability in the Targeted Killings Context: A Proposal for Judicial Review
The practical, pragmatic justification for the COAACC derives largely from considering social psychological findings AND choices and evaluate available alternatives than when subject to little to no review. Key to solve war Jervis, 4 (Robert, political science and international politics professor at Columbia University and a consultant to the CIA, The Record, 7/14, lexis)
But was that indeed what happened? "Groupthink" - identified in the early AND a small group, closed-mouthed and predisposed to keeping everything secret. NATO Drone debates collapse NATO Tom Parker 12, Former Policy Dir. for Terrorism, Counterterrorism and H. Rts. at Amnesty International, U.S. Tactics Threaten NATO, September 17, http://nationalinterest.org/commentary/us-tactics-threaten-nato-7461 A growing chasm in operational practice is opening up between the United States and its AND now forced to pay attention by their own courts, which will restrict coop
eration in the future. As recently as last month, the German federal prosecutor’s AND Something has to give—and it may just be the Atlantic alliance. NATO prevents global nuclear war Zbigniew Brzezinski 9, former U.S. National Security Adviser, Sept/Oct 2009, “An Agenda for NATO,” Foreign Affairs, 88.5, EBSCO NATO's potential is not primarily military. Although NATO is a collective-security alliance AND all the more menacing by the growing accessibility of weapons of mass destruction –
- not just to states but also, potentially, to extremist religious and political AND focused aroused Muslim resentments on the United States and the West more generally.
3/30/14
2AC Defund CP- NDT Round 7
Tournament: NDT | Round: 7 | Opponent: Georgia CS | Judge: Lyle, Polin, Norris Funding cuts are restrictions placed upon the President’s authority over indefinite detention
Hanes 11 (2011¶ Brigham Young University Law Review¶ 2011 B.Y AND support and patience. The views expressed in this Comment are his own.)
While the Constitution does not explicitly grant the power of the purse to Congress, AND funding restrictions have typically been justified solely on grounds of congressional power over spending
. n148 Indeed, the connection of several of the funding clauses to war powers AND of war at least to some degree through its appropriations power.¶ 4.
Firebreak Independently, US targeted killing is driving a global shift in strategic doctrine toward preventive self-defense---causes nuclear war Kerstin Fisk 13, visiting assistant professor in the Department of Political Science at Loyola Marymount University, PhD in Political Science from Claremont Graduate University, and Jennifer M. Ramos, Assistant Professor of Political Science at Loyola Marymount University, PhD in Political Science from UC Davis, April 15 2013, “Actions Speak Louder Than Words: Preventive Self-Defense as a Cascading Norm,” International Studies Perspectives, http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com.turing.library.northwestern.edu/doi/10.1111/insp.12013/full How and to what extent is the preventive use of force becoming the future of AND by discussing possibilities for further research and considering the implications of this phenomenon. The impact is an endless, global series of preventive wars---those go nuclear Ariel Colonomos 13, Director of Research at the French National Centre for Scientific Research, Ph.D. in political science from the Institut d'Etudes Politiques de Paris, “The Gamble of War: Is it Possible to Justify Preventive War?” p 72-75, google books John Yoo holds that the American interventions in Afghanistan or Iraq fulfilled the criteria of AND United States to its new enemies and of their greater number and dispersal.
3/30/14
2AC Midterms DA- NDT Round 7
Tournament: NDT | Round: 7 | Opponent: Georgia CS | Judge: Lyle, Polin, Norris Midterms 2AC – UQ GOP will take the Senate- strong candidates, funding gaps Martin, 3-15 -- NYT national political correspondent "Obama Factor Adds to Fears of Democrats," New York Times, 3-15-2014, www.nytimes.com/2014/03/16/us/politics/obama-factor-adds-to-fears-of-democrats.html, accessed 3-28-14
WASHINGTON - Democrats are becoming increasingly alarmed about their midterm election fortunes amid President Obama's AND Kentucky. Democrats, he said, are "getting beat to death."?
2AC – Link Turn GOP would push the plan and get the blame Howell, 7 -- University of Chicago Public Policy professors William, and Jon Pevehouse, "When Congress Stops Wars: Partisan Politics and Presidential Power," Foreign Affairs, 86.5, Sept-Oct 2007, themonkeycage.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Howell-Pevehouse-2007-1.pdf?343c0a, accessed 2-6-14
The partisan composition of Congress has historically been the decisive factor in determining whether lawmakers AND Iraq policy received such a favorable hearing in Congress from 2000 to 2006. Plan boosts Obama and dooms GOP- casts them as soft on terror Werner, 7 -- University of Wisconsin-Madison political science professor Timothy, Ph.D. in Political Science from University of Wisconsin–Madison and Peter Holm, UWM political science, "Political Capital and Presidential War Powers: Sources of Congressional Assertiveness on the Use of Force," March 2007, users.polisci.wisc.edu/Holm/uof-march2007-draft.pdf, accessed 2-5-14
At the same time, the pressures on members to support the president in his AND but the taboo against withdrawing support from troops in the field remains intense. Their link is irrelevant- not a referendum on Obama- empirical ev, distancing Cillizza, 2-2 -- Washington Post Chris, Washington Post, 2-2-14, www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2014-senate-races-may-be-referendum-on-obama-if-so-democrats-should-worry/2014/02/02/f566ddac-8c1b-11e3-95dd-36ff657a4dae_story.html, accessed 2-10-14
In Arkansas and Alaska, the Democratic incumbents are running and distancing themselves from the AND a well-regarded name, won despite the state’s clear Republican lean.
Scientists say the recent downturn in the rate of global warming will lead to lower AND Oxford. "The most extreme projections are looking less likely than before." We adapt Mendelsohn ‘9 – Robert O. Mendelsohn 9, the Edwin Weyerhaeuser Davis Professor, Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University, June 2009, “Climate Change and Economic Growth,” online: http://www.growthcommission.org/storage/cgdev/documents/gcwp060web.pdf
These statements are largely alarmist and misleading. Although climate change is a serious problem AND range climate risks. What is needed are long?run balanced responses.
1NC/ 2AC- Warming Inevitable United States not key to solve warming and inevitable Grose ‘13 (Thomas K., National Geographic News Writer, “As U.S. Cleans Its Energy Mix, It Ships Coal Problems Abroad”, March 15, 2013)
Ready for some good news about the environment? Emissions of carbon dioxide in the AND producers have made clear that they aim to tap into that growing market.
SENATE JUDICIARY DELAYS PATENT MARKUP: The committee Thursday delayed the long-awaited markup AND for his part, said he would continue fighting for the controversial measure.
No litigation explosion AND reform fails- not enough data and bill fails -addresses the wrong issue - there’s not enough data to get the solution right Merritt, 3-12 – EE Times news correspondent, Silicon Valley bureau chief; citing Daniel F. Spulber, research director of Northwestern University's Searle Center on Law Rick, "Patent Data Missing in Troll Debate," EE Times, 3-12-14, http://www.eetimes.com/document.asp?doc_id=1321364and_mc=MP_IW_EDT_STUB, accessed 3-13-14
Patent Data Missing In Troll Debate Congress and the Supreme Court are poised to take action on patent suits, but AND blue) in the 1991-2011 period, the GAO report said. XOs solve Kash, 3-3 -- InformationWeek Government editor Wyatt, "Vowing to combat patent trolls, the White House recently announced a series of executive actions," 3-3-14, InformationWeek, www.informationweek.com/government/leadership/patent-reform-tech-firms-attorneys-weigh-in/d/d-id/1114070, accessed 3-13-14 Among other measures, the White House and the USPTO: • established new educational AND art, to try to resolve disputes before they turn into costly lawsuits.
AT: Losers Lose Loser’s lose is wrong- dems and GOP feed a false narrative- there’s an epistemology disad to their arguments Beutler, 13 -- Salon staff writer Brian, “GOP’s massive new lie: The truth about Obama’s second term,” Salon, 9/9/13, www.salon.com/2013/09/09/syria_wont_derail_obamas_second_term_house_republicans_will/, accessed 3-29-14
It's factually and morally wrong to say his agenda is doomed if war vote loses AND or a farm bill, or a budget deal, or anything else.
2AC – Methane Thumper Backlash against Obama over emissions annoucnement Roberta Rampton and Timothy Gardner (writers for Reuters) March 28, 2014 “Obama considers new climate regulations for oil, gas sector” http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/03/28/us-usa-climatechange-obama-idUSBREA2R10P20140328 The White House said on Friday it will take a hard look at whether new AND wells on public lands, one way to begin cutting emissions of methane.
2AC- Weak Now Backlash now against Obama’s anti-terror policies The Washington Post 3/27/14 (Jennifer Rubin, "Bipartisan Second-Thoughts on National Security") There are signs of a bipartisan pushback against the passive foreign policy and hostility to AND , and they’re not grateful to him for giving them what they want.” 2AC – IMF Thumper IMF reform thumps losers lose Wiesman, 3-25 – NY Times congressional reporter Jonathan, "Senate Democrats Drop I.M.F. Reforms From Ukraine Aid," NY Times, 3-25-14, www.nytimes.com/2014/03/26/world/europe/senate-democrats-drop-imf-reforms-from-ukraine-aid-package.html, accessed 3-26-14
Democrats, bowing to united House Republican opposition, dropped reforms of International Monetary Fund AND the Republican leader. "I agree with these two important House Democrats. 2AC – NSA NSA reform triggers the link Cohen, 3-25 -- CNN Tom, Lisa Desjardins, and Jim Acosta, "Obama, Congress working on changes to NSA," CNN, 3-2-14, www.cnn.com/2014/03/25/politics/white-house-nsa/, accessed 3-26-14
President Barack Obama and congressional leaders described similar proposals Tuesday for ending the National Security AND current system was legal, but needed changing to reassure a skeptical public.
2AC – Immigration Obama immigration order triggers the link- thumps prez powers args Gomez, 3-23 -- USA Today Alan, "Obama 'humane' order roils immigration debate," WTSP News, 3-23-14, www.wtsp.com/story/news/nation-now/2014/03/23/obama-humane-deportation-order-immigration-debate/6787289/, accessed 3-26-14
Obama 'humane' order roils immigration debate President Obama's recent order to his administration to find ways to deport people living in AND through federal courts about the limits of presidential power that goes back decades.
2AC- Econ Thumper Collapse inevitable- fiscal/regulatory policies, export market crashes, market speculation Epoch Times 3/11 (Interview conducted by Valentin Schmid, Epoch Times. Peter Schiff is the CEO of investment firm Euro Pacific Capital. He correctly predicted the subprime crash and the ensuing financial crisis of 2008. Peter Schiff: US Economy ‘Screwed Up,’ Stock Market a ‘Bubble’ (+Video) http://www.theepochtimes.com/n3/553225-peter-schiff-us-economy-screwed-up-stock-market-a-bubble-video/)
Epoch Times: Mr. Schiff, what’s your view on the U.S AND from? It’s coming from the productive efforts of people outside of America.
1NC/ 2AC- Nuclear Primacy No scenario for losing deterrence Kristensen ‘12 -- FAS nuclear weapons expert Hans, "DOD: Strategic Stability Not Threatened Even by Greater Russian Nuclear Forces," FAS, 10-10-12, www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2012/10/strategicstability.php, accessed 1-27-13, mss
DOD: Strategic Stability Not Threatened Even by Greater Russian Nuclear Forces A Department of Defense (DOD) report on Russian nuclear forces, conducted in coordination with the Director of National Intelligence and sent to Congress in May 2012, concludes that even the most worst-case scenario of a Russian surprise disarming first strike against the United States would have “little to no effect” on the U.S. ability to retaliate with a devastating strike against Russia. I know, even thinking about scenarios such as this sounds like an echo from the Cold War, but the Obama administration has actually come under attack from some for considering further reductions of U.S. nuclear forces when Russia and others are modernizing their forces. The point would be, presumably, that reducing while others are modernizing would somehow give them an advantage over the United States. But the DOD report concludes that Russia “would not be able to achieve a militarily significant advantage by any plausible expansion of its strategic nuclear forces, even in a cheating or breakout scenario under the New START Treaty” (emphasis added). The conclusions are important because the report come after Vladimir Putin earlier this year announced plans to produce “over 400” new nuclear missiles during the next decade. Putin’s plan follows the Obama administration’s plan to spend more than $200 billion over the next decade to modernize U.S. strategic forces and weapons factories. The conclusions may also hint at some of the findings of the Obama administration’s ongoing (but delayed and secret) review of U.S. nuclear targeting policy. No Effects on Strategic Stability The DOD report – Report on the Strategic Nuclear Forces of the Russian Federation Pursuant to Section 1240 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 – was obtained under the Freedom of Information Act. It describes the U.S. intelligence community’s projection for the likely development of Russian nuclear forces through 2017 and 2022, the timelines of the New START Treaty, and possible implications for U.S. national security and strategic stability. Much of the report’s content was deleted before release – including general and widely reported factual information about Russian nuclear weapons systems that is not classified. But the important concluding section that describes the effects of possible shifts in the number and composition of Russian nuclear forces on strategic stability was released in its entirety. The section “Effects on Strategic Stability” begins by defining that stability in the strategic nuclear relationship between the United States and the Russian Federation depends upon the assured capability of each side to deliver a sufficient number of nuclear warheads to inflict unacceptable damage on the other side, even with an opponent attempting a disarming first strike. Consequently, the report concludes, “the only Russian shift in its nuclear forces that could undermine the basic framework of mutual deterrence that exists between the United States and the Russian Federation is a scenario that enables Russia to deny the United States the assured ability to respond against a substantial number of highly valued Russian targets following a Russian attempt at a disarming first strike” (emphasis added). The DOD concludes that such a first strike scenario “will most likely not occur.” But even if it did and Russia deployed additional strategic warheads to conduct a disarming first strike, even significantly above the New START Treaty limits, DOD concludes that it “would have little to no effects on the U.S. assured second-strike capabilities that underwrite our strategic deterrence posture” (emphasis added). In fact, the DOD report states, the “Russian Federation…would not be able to achieve a militarily significant advantage by any plausible expansion of its strategic nuclear forces, even in a cheating or breakout scenario under the New START Treaty, primarily because of the inherent survivability of the planned U.S. Strategic force structure, particularly the OHIO-class ballistic missile submarines, a number of which are at sea at any given time.” Implications These are BIG conclusions with BIG implications. They reaffirm conclusions made by DOD in 2010 http://www.foreign.senate.gov/publications/download/executive-report-111-06-treaty-with-russia-on-measures-for-further-reduction-and-limitation-of-strategic-offensive-arms-the-new-start-treaty, but the new report is important because it comes after Russia earlier this year announced plans to produce “over 400” nuclear missiles over the next decade. In the real world, however, Russian nuclear forces are not increasing. Even with Putin’s missile production plan, simultaneous retirement of older missile will continue the downward trend and result in a net reduction of Russian strategic nuclear forces over the next decade and a half. This fact has not stopped some from arguing against additional U.S. nuclear reductions. Their argument is that reductions are unwise at a time when Russia and others are modernizing their nuclear forces. Others have even argued that Russia could break out of the New START Treaty by cheating and presumably achieve some strategic advantage. Even the U.S. Senate’s advice and consent resolution that in 2010 approved the New START Treaty required that “the President should regulate reductions in United States strategic offensive arms so that the number of accountable strategic offensive arms under the New START Treaty possessed by the Russian Federation in no case exceeds the comparable number of accountable strategic offensive arms possessed by the United States to such an extent that a strategic imbalance endangers the national security interests of the United States” (emphasis added). A similar obsession with numbers was echoed in the 2012 report by the State Department’s International Strategic Advisory Board on future U.S.-Russian “Mutual Assured Stability,” which concluded that it requires some “rough parity” of nuclear forces. (A similar number obsession has evolved with NATO about non-strategic nuclear weapons, but that’s another story). But the DOD report appears to conclude that such warnings and parity requirement are missing the point. Strategic stability and deterrence today are provided by a secure retaliatory capability, primarily ballistic missile submarines. In fact, although ICBMs and bombers also play a role in the U.S. nuclear posture, they seem oddly absent from the report’s description of what is required to maintain strategic stability based on a sufficient secure retaliatory capability. Retaining that capability, it seems, does not even require the ballistic missile submarines to be on alert (although the report doesn’t explicitly say so). It only requires that a sufficient number of submarines “are at sea” and secure at any given time – or perhaps even only in a crisis. Likewise, the conclusion that a Russian disarming first strike “will most likely not occur” may be obvious to most but, if formal, seems to remove the need for having ICBMs on alert, as long as a sufficient number of submarines are at sea to provide the basic deterrence that underpins strategic stability.
WOT Navy Plan is key to naval operations- especially those necessary to win the war on terror Schachte 4 (Rear Adm. William L. Schachte, USN, April 8, “¶ MILITARY IMPLICATIONS OF THE UNITED¶ NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF¶ THE SEA”, http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CHRG-108shrg99782/html/CHRG-108shrg99782.htm) If we are going to successfully curtail this disturbing trend of ¶ creeping jurisdiction, AND diminishing resources more efficiently and ¶ effectively by concentrating on their primary missions.
2AC – LINK TURNS Popularity Loss on war powers bolsters Obama’s popularity- proves he is principled with no costs Thompson, 13 -- Forbes contributor Loren, "The Syria Vote: Why Obama Wins If He Loses," Forbes, 9-9-13, www.forbes.com/sites/lorenthompson/2013/09/09/the-syria-vote-why-obama-wins-if-he-loses/, accessed 2-8-13
The Syria Vote: Why Obama Wins If He Loses Sometime this week, Congress will begin voting on a resolution that would support President AND faced in the Middle East understands how involvement there can wreck domestic agendas. Principled loss even on unpopular issues is good politics- key to approval ratings Davis, 11 -- special counsel to President Clinton Lanny, formerly served under the Clinton and Bush W. administrations, Washington attorney specializing in legal crisis management, "Column: Obama, be a sharp-elbowed centrist," USA Today, 8-17-11, www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/forum/2011-08-17-obama-leadership-economy_n.htm, accessed 3-8-14
Such bold and decisive moves by this president would be criticized as brash by some AND good politics for 2012. It would also be good for the nation. Popularity is key to the agenda Friedman, 8 -- Stratfor chief intelligence officer George, "Obama: First Moves," Stratfor, 2008, www.stratfor.com/weekly/20081124_obama_first_moves?ip_auth_redirect=1, accessed 11-16-10)
Presidents are not as powerful as they are often imagined to be. Apart from AND is undoubtedly getting the honeymoon bounce now. He needs to hold that.
Stuck in senate Williams 3/27 (Andrew Williams, Andrew W. Williams is a partner with McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert and Berghoff LLP. Dr. Williams' practice primarily consists of patent litigation, prosecution, and opinion work in the areas of biotechnology, pharmaceuticals, and chemistry., Dr. Williams is a contributing author to the Patent Docs weblog, a site focusing on biotechnology and pharmaceutical patent law, “Senate Judiciary Committee Takes Up, Then Tables, Patent Reform”, http://www.patentdocs.org/2014/03/senate-judiciary-committee-takes-up-then-tables-patent-reform.html, March 27, 2014)
Earlier today, the Senate Committee on the Judiciary held an Executive Business Meeting in AND progress of this bill, and any amendments that are made to it. THAT MEANS Link uniqueness shapes uniqueness – not issue specific uniqueness Galen, 3-17 – former Press Secretary for the Speaker of the House Rich, "Obama is Poisonous," Real Clear Politics, 3-17-14, www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2014/03/17/obama_is_poisonous_121954.html, accessed 3-20-14
There is not much statistical difference between an approval rating of 42 and 39 ( AND identified, said Mr. Obama was becoming 'poisonous' to the party's candidates." Especially true on fights over war powers- rally around the flag Werner, 7 -- University of Wisconsin-Madison political science professor Timothy, Ph.D. in Political Science from University of Wisconsin–Madison and Peter Holm, UWM political science, "Political Capital and Presidential War Powers: Sources of Congressional Assertiveness on the Use of Force," March 2007, users.polisci.wisc.edu/Holm/uof-march2007-draft.pdf, accessed 2-5-14
At the same time, the pressures on members to support the president in his AND but the taboo against withdrawing support from troops in the field remains intense. We control uniqueness- Obama’s approval is below 50; dems are avoiding him Friedman, 14 -- NY Daily News staff Dan, "As Obama's approval rating slips, Democrats are avoiding him," NY Daily News, 2-24-14, www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/obama-negative-approval-rating-dems-ducking-article-1.1700590, accessed 3-9-14
As Obama's approval rating slips, Democrats are avoiding him Dems dodge Obama, whose AND Democrats hope to gain seats. Obama lost all those states in 2012. That’s key- 50 approval is try or die for Obama’s agenda Kuhn, 9 -- Politico staff David, "Obama Below 50 in Gallup, What it Means," 11-20-9, Real Clear Politics, http://realclearpolitics.blogs.time.com/2009/11/20/gallup-obama-below-50-percent/, accessed 11-20-9
For the first time, Barack Obama fell below 50 percent in the Gallup tracking AND the mean of major public polls, is at 50.6 percent.
SENATE JUDICIARY DELAYS PATENT MARKUP: The committee Thursday delayed the long-awaited markup AND for his part, said he would continue fighting for the controversial measure.
No litigation explosion AND reform fails- not enough data and bill fails -addresses the wrong issue - there’s not enough data to get the solution right Merritt, 3-12 – EE Times news correspondent, Silicon Valley bureau chief; citing Daniel F. Spulber, research director of Northwestern University's Searle Center on Law Rick, "Patent Data Missing in Troll Debate," EE Times, 3-12-14, http://www.eetimes.com/document.asp?doc_id=1321364and_mc=MP_IW_EDT_STUB, accessed 3-13-14
Patent Data Missing In Troll Debate Congress and the Supreme Court are poised to take action on patent suits, but AND blue) in the 1991-2011 period, the GAO report said.
AT: Losers Lose Loser’s lose is wrong- dems and GOP feed a false narrative- there’s an epistemology disad to their arguments Beutler, 13 -- Salon staff writer Brian, “GOP’s massive new lie: The truth about Obama’s second term,” Salon, 9/9/13, www.salon.com/2013/09/09/syria_wont_derail_obamas_second_term_house_republicans_will/, accessed 3-29-14
It's factually and morally wrong to say his agenda is doomed if war vote loses AND or a farm bill, or a budget deal, or anything else.
2AC- Weak Now Backlash now against Obama’s anti-terror policies The Washington Post 3/27/14 (Jennifer Rubin, "Bipartisan Second-Thoughts on National Security") There are signs of a bipartisan pushback against the passive foreign policy and hostility to AND , and they’re not grateful to him for giving them what they want.” 2AC – IMF Thumper IMF reform thumps losers lose Wiesman, 3-25 – NY Times congressional reporter Jonathan, "Senate Democrats Drop I.M.F. Reforms From Ukraine Aid," NY Times, 3-25-14, www.nytimes.com/2014/03/26/world/europe/senate-democrats-drop-imf-reforms-from-ukraine-aid-package.html, accessed 3-26-14
Democrats, bowing to united House Republican opposition, dropped reforms of International Monetary Fund AND the Republican leader. "I agree with these two important House Democrats.
2AC- Econ Thumper Collapse inevitable- fiscal/regulatory policies, export market crashes, market speculation Epoch Times 3/11 (Interview conducted by Valentin Schmid, Epoch Times. Peter Schiff is the CEO of investment firm Euro Pacific Capital. He correctly predicted the subprime crash and the ensuing financial crisis of 2008. Peter Schiff: US Economy ‘Screwed Up,’ Stock Market a ‘Bubble’ (+Video) http://www.theepochtimes.com/n3/553225-peter-schiff-us-economy-screwed-up-stock-market-a-bubble-video/)
Epoch Times: Mr. Schiff, what’s your view on the U.S AND surface, the economy is actually deteriorating. Eventually it’s going to collapse.
Epoch Times: Why? Mr. Schiff: There is a limit to AND from? It’s coming from the productive efforts of people outside of America.
Popularity Loss on war powers bolsters Obama’s popularity- proves he is principled with no costs Thompson, 13 -- Forbes contributor Loren, "The Syria Vote: Why Obama Wins If He Loses," Forbes, 9-9-13, www.forbes.com/sites/lorenthompson/2013/09/09/the-syria-vote-why-obama-wins-if-he-loses/, accessed 2-8-13
The Syria Vote: Why Obama Wins If He Loses Sometime this week, Congress will begin voting on a resolution that would support President AND faced in the Middle East understands how involvement there can wreck domestic agendas.
Alt causes overwhelm or hegemony is resilient Copley ’12 (Gregory R., editor of Defense and Foreign Affairs’ Strategic Policy, Strategic Policy in an Age of Global Realignment, lexis, June 2012)
3. Strategic Recovery by the US. The US will not, in 2012 AND . Banks are as afraid of such investment as are manufacturing investors themselves. Sequestration thumper Lightfoot ’13 (Jeff Lightfoot, deputy director of the Brent Scowcroft Center on International Security at the Atlantic Council, “Sequestration’s Credibility Costs,”http:nationalinterest.org/commentary/sequestrations-credibility-costs-8172, March 1, 2013)
The debate over sequestration is focused nearly entirely on the impact of spending reductions on AND Iran could plunge the Mideast into a war the United States can ill afford
1AR Ptx
Impact d
Their impact presses on central asia just dumb
Fettweis ‘10 (Chris Fettweis, Professor of national security affairs @ U.S. Naval War College, Georgetown University Press, “Dangerous times?: the international politics of great power peace” Google Books)
Simply stated, the hegemonic stability theory proposes that international peace is only possible when AND worth noting for our purposes that the United States was no less safe.
Uq
Won’t pass --- delay
Stuck in senate Williams 3/27 (Andrew Williams, Andrew W. Williams is a partner with McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert and Berghoff LLP. Dr. Williams' practice primarily consists of patent litigation, prosecution, and opinion work in the areas of biotechnology, pharmaceuticals, and chemistry., Dr. Williams is a contributing author to the Patent Docs weblog, a site focusing on biotechnology and pharmaceutical patent law, “Senate Judiciary Committee Takes Up, Then Tables, Patent Reform”, http://www.patentdocs.org/2014/03/senate-judiciary-committee-takes-up-then-tables-patent-reform.html, March 27, 2014)
Earlier today, the Senate Committee on the Judiciary held an Executive Business Meeting in AND progress of this bill, and any amendments that are made to it. PC doesn’t solve Shapiro 3/26 (Gary Shapiro, Shapiro is president and CEO of the Consumer Electronics Association (CEA)®, the U.S. trade association representing more than 2,000 consumer electronics companies, and author of the New York Times best-selling books, Ninja Innovation: The Ten Killer Strategies of the World's Most Successful Businesses and The Comeback: How Innovation Will Restore the American Dream, “Senate should finish off the patent trolls”, http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/technology/201701-senate-should-finish-off-the-patent-trolls, March 26, 2014)
Recent strong action by Congress and the White House against patent trolls is a rare AND patent troll plague once and for all, and allow innovators to thrive.
Sen. Patrick Leahy The Senate's version of a bill to curb patent troll abuses AND effectively derailing Leahy's goal to move his bill out of committee as planned.
The rest of the uniqueness ev they read do not say that political capital is key to getting it done
It says Obama is pushing – and then it’ll pass
Won’t pass – committee opposition Bachman 3/27 Katy, Washington Bureau Chief, “Senate Patent Troll Bill Gets Delayed in Committee”. Adweek Online. 3/27/24, http://www.adweek.com/news/technology/senate-patent-troll-bill-gets-delayed-committee-156572 Advocates for patent troll reform have been anxiously waiting for the Senate to catch up AND have to have minority support. We have to get a bill done."
Fiat – reject the argument the link
1AR – IMF Thumper
The date of the IMF cards
Obama back off of IMF reform triggers losers-lose Deb Riechmann and Donna Cassata (writer for Nanaimo Daily News) March 27, 2014 “In show of solidarity with Obama, Congress backs bills to aid Ukraine, punish Russia” www.nanaimodailynews.com/news/in-show-of-solidarity-with-obama-congress-backs-bills-to-aid-ukraine-punish-russia-1.931430 The votes came as Obama wrapped up a European trip in which he enlisted the AND a defeat for the Obama administration, which had promoted the IMF provisions.
Losers win
Principled loss even on unpopular issues is good politics- key to approval ratings Davis, 11 -- special counsel to President Clinton Lanny, formerly served under the Clinton and Bush W. administrations, Washington attorney specializing in legal crisis management, "Column: Obama, be a sharp-elbowed centrist," USA Today, 8-17-11, www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/forum/2011-08-17-obama-leadership-economy_n.htm, accessed 3-8-14
Such bold and decisive moves by this president would be criticized as brash by some AND good politics for 2012. It would also be good for the nation.
AND- that turns the entirety of the DA --- Popularity is key to the agenda Friedman, 8 -- Stratfor chief intelligence officer George, "Obama: First Moves," Stratfor, 2008, www.stratfor.com/weekly/20081124_obama_first_moves?ip_auth_redirect=1, accessed 11-16-10)
Presidents are not as powerful as they are often imagined to be. Apart from AND is undoubtedly getting the honeymoon bounce now. He needs to hold that.
3/30/14
2AC Warfighting DA- NDT Round 4
Tournament: NDT | Round: 4 | Opponent: Northwestern MV | Judge: Young, Wunderlich, Arnett Warfighting 2AC Navigational rights link turns the DA Galdorisi and Truver, ’05 (George, Director Space and Naval Warfare Center @ San Diego, Scott, National Security Programs @ Anteon Corp, Washington Times, 3/29) *gender modified The evolving U.S. strategic paradigm, dependent as it is on littoral AND role at the State Department, will add to an already burgeoning portfolio. Congress key to credible posture and commitments Waxman 13 (Matthew C- Professor of Law at Columbia Law School; Adjunct Senior Fellow for Law and Foreign Policy, Council on Foreign Relations, “The Constitutional Power to Threaten War”, Forthcoming in Yale Law Journal, vol. 123 (2014), 8/25/2013, PDF) A second argument, this one advanced by some congressionalists, is that stronger legislative AND by pointing foreign actors to the appropriate institution or process for reading them.
3. Germ warfare!Like chemical agents, biological weapons have never lived up AND out humanity before, and it seems unlikely to happen in the future. 2NC kicked DA wrong- it had a proliferation and deterrence impact- more evidence on it causing extinction- not a new argument- and means turns the ptx Taylor 6 Theodore B., Chairman of NOVA. July 6 2006, “Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons,” http://wwwee.stanford.edu/~hellman/Breakthrough/book/chapters/taylor.html Nuclear proliferation - be it among nations or terrorists - greatly increases the chance of AND , the small nuclear war could easily escalate into a global nuclear war.
Constraints improve decision-making Deborah NPearlstein 9, lecturer in public and international affairs, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, July 2009, "Form and Function in the National Security Constitution," Connecticut Law Review, 41 ConnLRev1549, lexis nexis It is in part for such reasons that studies of organizational performance in crisis management AND something more than arbitrary attention has been paid before transcendent priorities are overridden.
3/29/14
2AC- Circumvention- NDT Round 4
Tournament: NDT | Round: 4 | Opponent: Northwestern MV | Judge: Young, Wunderlich, Arnett Circumvention No means- Power of the purse solves Elsea et al ’13 (Jennifer K. Elsea, Legislative Attorney; Michael John Garcia, Legislative Attorney; Thomas J. Nicola, Legislative Attorney; CRS Report for Congress, “Congressional Authority to Limit Military Operations”, http://fpc.state.gov/documents/organization/206121.pdf, February 19, 2013) The Purpose Statute states that funds may be used only for purposes for which they AND the amount— zero—that Congress has appropriated for the prohibited purpose.
No motivation- Obama already conformed us to UNCLOS (and the plan is popular, others push the aff, and other treaties thump the DA) Block 13 (Ben- taff writer with the Worldwatch Institute, “U.S. Leaders Support Law of the Sea Treaty”, http://www.worldwatch.org/node/5993) During last week's Cabinet confirmation hearings, leaders in both the U.S. AND groups, and the mining, fishing, shipping, and telecommunications industries.
Exposing secrecy and furthering public engagement through the 1AC resolves Glennon ACLU 14, Privacy SOS campaign from Massachusetts ACLU, “When it comes to fighting the 'double state', knowledge is power”, 1/20, http://privacysos.org/node/1304 As Glennon argues in the Harvard National Security Journal, the danger in the United AND , no matter what the Bill of Rights has to say about it.
3/29/14
2AC- Debt Ceiling
Tournament: Georgia State University | Round: 4 | Opponent: Emory JoSi | Judge: Buntin 2AC- Debt Ceiling
Double bind- Republican obstructionism inevitable- PC not key Reuters 9/18/13 (and#34;White House Says Republicans Moving Away From Compromise On Debt Limitand#34
The White House said on Wednesday that the House of Representatives had moved away from AND to a wholly unnecessary and damaging shutdown of the government,and#34; he said.
Or raise inevitable Hertig 9/15/13 (Alyssa, Politics for Policy Mic, and#34;Debt Ceiling 2013: We Will Raise the Debt Ceiling, Even Though 55 Of Americans Donand#39;t Want Toand#34 The debt ceiling was first imposed in 1917 amid cries for accountability before President Woodrow AND Democrats and Republicans in October, but ultimately the ceiling will be raised.
Political capital not key to debt Klein 9/18/13 (Ezra, Editor of Wonkblog Columnist at the Washington Post, and#34;The White House Doesnand#39;t Think It Can Prevent a Government Shutdownand#34
2) In 2011, the White House was willing to deal. The White AND Wall Street and other outside actors who could put pressure on the GOP.
Obama XO Polman 9/19/13 (Dick, Writer for National Interest, and#34;National Interest: How Obama CAn Stop the Apocalypseand#34
But, in the interests of protecting our credit rating, and ensuring that Uncle AND right-wing nonsense, once and for all. Just lead already.
Treasury checks Los Angeles Times 9/10/13 (and#34;US Will Hit Debt Limit Bewteen Oct. 18 and Nov. 5 Analysis Saysand#34
A more likely scenario, based on statements Treasury officials made in a 2012 inspector AND $108 billion of that cushion left to use, the analysis said.
WASHINGTON — Uncomfortable with the Obama administrationand#39;s use of deadly drones, a growing number AND a more sober look at where we should be with use of force.and#34;
PC theory is wrong- winners win Hirsh ’13 (National Journal chief correspondent, citing various political scientists, Michael, former Newsweek senior correspondent, and#34;There’s No Such Thing as Political Capital,and#34; National Journal, 2-9-13, www.nationaljournal.com/magazine/there-s-no-such-thing-as-political-capital-20130207, accessed 2-8-13, mss
The idea of political capital—or mandates, or momentum—is so poorly AND right. He did. (At least until Vietnam, that is.)
Impact empirically denied Barnett ‘9 (Thomas P.M. Barnett, senior managing director of Enterra Solutions LLC, “The New Rules: Security Remains Stable Amid Financial Crisis,” 8/25/2009)
When the global financial crisis struck roughly a year ago, the blogosphere was ablaze AND great resilience of Americaand#39;s post-World War II international liberal trade order.
Econ resilient, US isn’t key, and impact empirically denied Lamy ’11(Pascal Lamy is the Director-General of the World Trade Organization. Lamy is Honorary President of Paris-based think tank Notre Europe. Lamy graduated from the prestigious Sciences Po Paris, from HEC and ÉNA, graduating second in his year of those specializing in economics. “System Upgrade” BY PASCAL LAMY | APRIL 18, 2011)
The bigger test came with the 2008-2009 Great Recession, the first truly AND enabling these countries to lift hundreds of millions of people out of poverty.
“In an era of polarized parties and a fragmented Congress, the opportunities to AND a partisan content, with contemporary complaints coming from the incumbent president’s opponents.”
Congress key 1) Future presidential rollback Harvard Law Review 12, "Developments in the Law: Presidential Authority," Vol. 125:2057, www.harvardlawreview.org/media/pdf/vol125_devo.pdf
The recent history of signing statements demonstrates how public opinion can effectively check presidential expansions AND practices. 147 Only time, and perhaps public opinion, will tell.
We have lived with this “war on terror” for a third of my AND if only in the ways that Obama says that he has constrained himself.
We impact turn their solvency mechanism- flexibility causes failed drone policy- can’t solve instability or credibility Farley ’12 (Benjamin R. Farley, J.D. with honors, Emory University School of Law, 2011. Editor-in-Chief, Emory International Law Review, 2010-2011. M.A., The George Washington University Elliott School of International Affairs, 2007, South Texas Law Review, 54 S. Tex. L. Rev. 385, “ARTICLE: Drones and Democracy: Missing Out on Accountability?”, Winter, 2012)
Removing the constraints policymakers face when choosing to use force may be advantageous. Indeed AND U.S. accountability system for use-of-force decisions.
9/21/13
2AC- Security K
Tournament: Georgia State University | Round: 4 | Opponent: Emory JoSi | Judge: Buntin Their impact is wrong – debate over even the most technical issues improves decision-making and advocacy Ben- Naftali ‘3 (Orna Ben-Naftali, Head of the International Law Division and of the Law and Culture Division, The Law School, The College of Management Academic Studies, Spring 2003, ARTICLE: 'We Must Not Make a Scarecrow of the Law': A Legal Analysis of the Israeli Policy of Targeted Killings, 36 Cornell Int'l L.J. 233)
Our analysis concludes that while a specific act of preemptive killing may be legal if AND some possible betterment. This article hopes to contribute to this modest goal.
A stable system of deterrence prevents nuclear war – it create a stable ontological context for interaction and expectations Lupovici 8 (Amir, Post-Doctoral Fellow Munk Centre for International Studies, Why the Cold War Practices of Deterrence are Still Prevalent: Physical Security, Ontological Security and Strategic Discourse, http://www.cpsa-acsp.ca/ papers-2008/Lupovici.pdf, AD: 9/22/10) jl ‘ Since deterrence can become part of the actors’ identity, it is also involved in AND it strengthened the actors’ identities and created more stable expectations of avoiding violence.
Alt doesn’t generate political movements O'Callaghan ‘2 ( Lecturer in IR, 02 (Terry , lecturer in the school of International Relations at the University of South Australia, International Relations and the third debate, ed: Jarvis, 2002, p. 80-81)
There are also a host of technological and logistical questions that plague George's scheme and AND creativity, and openness, George's postmodern musings have understandably attracted few disciples.
9/21/13
2AC- Targeted Killing
Tournament: Georgia State University | Round: 4 | Opponent: Emory JoSi | Judge: Buntin 2AC T- “Targeted killing”
We meet and our aff is key to topic education Zenko ’12 Micah, Douglas Dillon fellow in the Center for Preventive Action (CPA) at the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). Previously, he worked for five years at the Harvard Kennedy School and in Washington, DC, at the Brookings Institution, Congressional Research Service, and State Department’s Office of Policy Planning, “Targeted Killings and Signature Strikes,” June 16, http://blogs.cfr.org/zenko/2012/07/16/targeted-killings-and-signature-strikes/
No matter how U.S. officials (secretly) refer to the practice AND After ten years of signature strikes, isn’t this a debate worth having?
2. Counter-interp- “targeted killings” means killing without judicial review- includes signature strikes Wallace ’12 Bruce, founder of 121Contact.org, a website aimed at preventing and coping with political violence, member of the Steering Committee of September Eleventh Families for Peaceful Tomorrows, “Obama’s Targeted Killing Strategy and Drone Strike Tactics,” Sept. 30, http://121contact.typepad.com/my_weblog/2012/09/sept-30-2012-obamas-targeted-killing-strategy-and-drone-strike-tactics.html
Targeted Killing, a simple definition: attacks on suspected terrorists in other nations without AND is already taking shape in the powerful recruiting propaganda that the strikes engender.
Drones are a crucial piece of the United States’ global war on terror. They AND going to funerals, because they are so frequently targeted by signature strikes.
9/21/13
AT Circumvention Say No
Tournament: Georgia State University | Round: 4 | Opponent: Emory JoSi | Judge: Buntin Obama will follow through- aligns himself with Congress Bellinger ’13 (John B. Bellinger III, Adjunct Senior Fellow for International and National Security Law, “Seeking Daylight on U.S. Drone Policy”, http://www.cfr.org/drones/seeking-daylight-us-drone-policy/p30348, March 29, 2013)
The president also has additional constitutional authority anytime to use force to protect the Unites AND that they are acting outside of the grant given to them by Congress.
Political accountability key to solve say no Farley ’12 (Benjamin R. Farley, J.D. with honors, Emory University School of Law, 2011. Editor-in-Chief, Emory International Law Review, 2010-2011. M.A., The George Washington University Elliott School of International Affairs, 2007, South Texas Law Review, 54 S. Tex. L. Rev. 385, “ARTICLE: Drones and Democracy: Missing Out on Accountability?”, Winter, 2012)
Policymakers take advantage of the existing flaws in or intentional weaknesses of the supervisory accountability AND mechanisms or fix the flaws in the existing supervisory and fiscal accountability system.
Congress would invoke the power of the purse- solves Elsea et al ’13 (Jennifer K. Elsea, Legislative Attorney; Michael John Garcia, Legislative Attorney; Thomas J. Nicola, Legislative Attorney; CRS Report for Congress, “Congressional Authority to Limit Military Operations”, http://fpc.state.gov/documents/organization/206121.pdf, February 19, 2013)
The Purpose Statute states that funds may be used only for purposes for which they AND the amount— zero—that Congress has appropriated for the prohibited purpose.
Congress exerting the power of the purse key to check presidential warfare Fisher ‘7 (Louis Fisher is a specialist in constitutional law with the Law Library of the Library of Congress, after working for the Congressional Research Service from 1970 to March 6, 2006. During his service with CRS he was research di rector of the House Iran-Contra Committee in 1987, writing major sections of the final report. Fish er received his doctorate in political science from the New School for Social Research and has taught at a number of universities and law schools, appearing before the Senate Committee on the Judiciary, loc.gov/law/help/usconlaw/pdf/Feingold2007rev.pdf, “Exercising Congress’s Constitutional Power to End a War”, January 30, 2007)
The framers carefully studied this monarchical model and repudiated it in its entirety. Not AND , from those who are to spend to those who are to pay.”
9/21/13
FAA Affirmative- 1AC Dartmouth
Tournament: Dartmouth RR | Round: 5 | Opponent: Michigan AP | Judge: Drone Industry Advantage
It’s a good bet that in the not-so-distant future aerial drones AND , executive director of the Airborne Law Enforcement Association. "It's frustrating." Resolving public hostility key Kaste ’13 (Martin Kaste / NPR, “Will Bureaucracy Keep The U.S. Drone Industry Grounded?”, http://www.ideastream.org/news/npr/179843540, April 30, 2013)
Tough federal aviation rules and public backlash against drones have raised worries that the U AND Applewhite says. "We're losing it because we can't test the vehicles."
Armed drones are the issue Wood ’13 (David Wood, Wood has been a journalist since 1970, a staff correspondent successively for Time Magazine, the Los Angeles Times, Newhouse News Service, The Baltimore Sun and Politics Daily. A birthright Quaker and former conscientious objector, he covers military issues, foreign affairs and combat operations. His 10-part series on the severely wounded of Iraq and Afghanistan won the 2012 Pulitzer Prize for national reporting, A Pulitzer Prize finalist, he has won the Gerald R. Ford Prize for Distinguished Defense Reporting and other national awards. He has appeared on CNN, CSPAN, the PBS News Hour, WUSA , RTV and the BBC, and is a regular guest on National Public Radio’s Diane Rehm Show. He has lectured at the U.S. Army Eisenhower Fellows Conference , the Marine Staff College, the Joint Forces Staff College and Temple University, “Drone Attacks Spur Legal Debate On Definition Of 'Battlefield'”, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/14/drone-attacks-legal-debate_n_2687980.html, February 14, 2013)
WASHINGTON -- After a CIA Predator drone released its guided bomb high over Yemen on AND ? Could an al Qaeda terrorist protect himself by becoming an American citizen? Drone usage key to artic exploration- both oil drilling, shipping, and environmental cleanup Hsu ’13 (Jeremy Hsu, LiveScience, “Drones handle all kinds of work in Arctic -- and there's lots more to do”, http://www.nbcnews.com/science/drones-handle-all-kinds-work-arctic-theres-lots-more-do-8C11012648, August 27, 2013)
Small drones may soon take to the skies above Earth's top with the aim of AND , they'll cut down on paperwork, but won't cut down on work."
Scenario 1: Trans-Alaska Pipeline US Drilling is key to economic growth and open access to pressure resources- prevents Trans-Alaska Pipeline System collapse Holt ’12 (David Holt, President of Consumer Energy Alliance, “HOLT: Arctic oil and gas exploration could revitalize West Coast”, http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/oct/23/arctic-oil-and-gas-exploration-could-revitalize-we/, October 23, 2012)
The United States took a giant step toward securing its energy future this month with AND — which, in California, includes the world’s ninth-largest economy.
Tension is building in the Arctic, where countries are vying for valuable natural resources AND activity means that the frigid Arctic is once again becoming a hot spot.
Oil shocks would cause extinction Henderson, Besline Research CEO/President/consultant, 07 (Bill, CounterCurrents.org, February 24, “Climate Change, Peak Oil, and Nuclear War”, http://www.countercurren
2/2/14
Geography 1AC- Harvard
Tournament: Harvard | Round: 2 | Opponent: Georgia CS | Judge: Peter Susko Geography 1AC Advantage {X}: Drone Failure Drone strikes are causing instability and terrorist backlash in Pakistan and Yemen- creating a failed state syndrome and killing relations Rohde ’12 (David Rohde, American author and investigative journalist for Thomson Reuters. While a reporter for The Christian Science Monitor, he won the Pulitzer Prize for International Reporting in 1996 for his coverage of the Srebrenica massacre. From July 2002 until December 2004, he was co-chief of The New York Times' South Asia bureau, based in New Delhi, India. He shared a second Pulitzer Prize for Times 2008 team coverage of Afghanistan and Pakistan, While in Afghanistan, Rohde was kidnapped by members of the Taliban in November 2008, but managed to escape in June 2009 after seven months in captivity, “How Obama’s drone war is backfiring”, http://blogs.reuters.com/david-rohde/2012/03/01/how-obamas-drone-war-is-backfiring/, March/April issue of Foreign Policy, March 1, 2012)
When Barack Obama took the oath of office three years ago, no one associated AND he asked me. “I don’t think we’ve answered that question yet.”
Pakistan collapse causes nuclear war Pitt ‘9 (William, a New York Times and internationally bestselling author of two books: "War on Iraq: What Team Bush Doesn't Want You to Know" and "The Greatest Sedition Is Silence.", “Unstable Pakistan Threatens the World,” http://www.arabamericannews.com/news/index.php?mod=articleandcat=commentaryandarticle=2183, May 8, 2009)
But a suicide bomber in Pakistan rammed a car packed with explosives into a jeep AND to be gravely serious about addressing the situation. So should we all.
And Pakistan nukes are not secure Gregory ’11 (Shaun, Director of the Pakistan Security Research Unit at the University of Bradford, UK, a professor who published widely on nuclear and security issues in Pakistan and advises many governments, their agencies, and international organizations, “Terrorist Tactics in Pakistan Threaten Nuclear Weapons Safety,” CTC Sentinel, Vol. 4.6, http://kms1.isn.ethz.ch/serviceengine/Files/ISN/131002/ichaptersection_singledocument/aa282522-4971-4513-a7ca-ec3afcd259be/en/Art+2.pdf, accessed 10-26-11, June 2011)
Two high-profile attacks by terrorists on highly secure military bases in Pakistan, AND odds that Pakistan’s nuclear weapons security will eventually be compromised continue to rise.
Towards the end of July, the leader of AQAP, Nasir al Wuhayshi, AND world) with Al Shabaab’s reach can make for a particularly challenging situation.
Collapse of trade causes war Panzner ‘8 (Michael, faculty at the New York Institute of Finance, 25-year veteran of the global stock, bond, and currency markets who has worked in New York and London for HSBC, Soros Funds, ABN Amro, Dresdner Bank, and JPMorgan Chase, “Financial Armageddon: Protect Your Future from Economic Collapse”, Revised and Updated Edition, p. 136-138, googlebooks)
Continuing calls for curbs on the flow of finance and trade will inspire the United AND between Muslims and Western societies as the beginnings of a new world war.
The plan is key to a new successful Counterterrorism strategy-
A new set of drone operating procedures would help to repair international relations and decrease AND agenda, for the purpose of improving foreign policy and repairing international relations.
Working with Regional and Host Country Partners The third lesson is that in most cases AND , as will support to regional security structures like the Gulf Cooperation Council.
2) The plan shifts the CIA to focus to intel – solves better Anderson ’13 (Kenneth Anderson, Professor of law at Washington College of Law, American University; a visiting fellow of the Hoover Institution and member of its Task Force on National Security and Law; and a non-resident senior fellow of the Brookings Institution. He writes on international law, the laws of war, and national security, and his most recent book is "Living with the UN: American Responsibilities and International Order.", “Taking the CIA Out of Drone Strikes? The Obama Administration’s Yemen Experience”, http://www.lawfareblog.com/2013/05/taking-the-cia-out-of-drone-strikes-the-obama-administrations-yemen-experience/, May 28, 2013)
Washington Post national security reporter Greg Miller has an excellent story in Sunday’s paper on AND some cautions about how easy it is to create this division of labor.
3) Over-reliance on drones causes failed policy Schwartz ’13 (Bernard L. Schwartz, Senior Fellow New America Foundation, Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center, “The Constitutional and Counterterrorism Implications of Targeted Killing Testimony Before the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Human Rights”, April 23, 2013)
3. The true costs of current US drone policy When we come to rely AND it, drone strikes remain “a tactic in search of a strategy.”
The first category of nations, while not targeted by drone strikes, is intimidated AND Europe are to be fixed, a change in drone protocol is needed. Advantage {Y}: Sovereignty Violations Unrestrained executive drone policy violates sovereignty claims and undermines rule of law- sends a global signal Schwartz ’13 (Bernard L. Schwartz, Senior Fellow New America Foundation, Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center, “The Constitutional and Counterterrorism Implications of Targeted Killing Testimony Before the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Human Rights”, April 23, 2013)
Once you take targeted killings outside hot battlefields, it’s a different story . The AND are they , as some human rights groups have argued, unlawful murder?
A hard signal is key- exceptions break the norm- each strike goes loud Kels ‘12 Maj. Charles G. Kels is an attorney for the Department of Homeland Security and an individual mobilization augmentee with the U.S. Air Force Office of the Judge Advocate General, “Mixed messages on drone strikes,” July 16, https://wiki.nps.edu/display/CRUSER/2012/07/16/Mixed+messages+on+drone+strikes
Finally, the administration emphasizes its "rigorous standards and process of review ... when AND targeting rules to degrade the efficient and lawful application of our military might.
Drones outside battlefield specifically causes aggressive arms race based off of US modeling Bergen and Rowland ’12 Peter Bergen, director of the National Security Studies Program at the New America Foundation, a research fellow at New York University's Center on Law and Security and CNN's national security analyst, former adjunct lecturer at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University and an Adjunct Professor at the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins University, CNN National Security analyst, and Jennifer Rowland, research associate at the New America Foundation, “A dangerous new world of drones,” http://www.cnn.com/2012/10/01/opinion/bergen-world-of-drones/index.html
A decade ago, the United States had a virtual monopoly on drones. Not AND the future as much as tanks and bombers did during the 20th century.
This “world as a battlefield” precedent risk accidental miscalc that escalates Dowd ’13 (Alan Dowd, Writes on national defense, foreign policy, and international security. His writing has appeared in multiple publications including Parameters, Policy Review, The Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations, World Politics Review, American Outlook, The Baltimore Sun, The Washington Times, The National Post, The Wall Street Journal Europe, The Jerusalem Post, and The Financial Times Deutschland. He holds a B.A. with high honors from Butler University and an M.A. from Indiana University, “Drone Wars: Risks and Warnings”, http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/parameters/Issues/WinterSpring_2013/1_Article_Dowd.pdf, Winter/Spring 2013)
First, if the battlespace is the entire earth, the enemy would seem to AND spawned a new era of danger for the United States and its allies.
Breaks down deterrence Boyle ‘13 Michael J. Boyle, PhD, is an Assistant Professor of Political Science at La Salle University in Philadelphia. He was previously a Lecturer in International Relations and Research Fellow at the Centre for the Study of Terrorism and Political Violence at the University of St. Andrews. He is also an alumnus of the Political Science Department at La Salle, research interests are on terrorism and political violence, with particular reference to the strategic use of violence in insurgencies and civil wars, “The costs and consequences of drone warfare,” International Affairs 89: 1 (2013) 1–29, http://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/public/International20Affairs/2013/89_1/89_1Boyle.pdf, 2013
The emergence of this arms race for drones raises at least five long-term AND the legal and evidentiary difficulties associated with giving them a fair trial.147
Independently- Executive uncertainty of US Drone policy cause accident and escalatory wars Dean ‘13 Adriana, degree from the University of Southern California in Philosophy, Politics and Law, Chapter Officer of Young Americans for Liberty, an organization with over 125,000 members nationwide, “Targeted Killings Behind the Veil of Ignorance,” http://www.academia.edu/3832442/Targeted_Killings_Behind_the_Veil_of_Ignorance
While there are some justifiable points for the targeted killing program that individuals behind the AND haunt not only the executive, but the United States as a whole.
Armenia and Azerbaijan could soon be at war if drone proliferation on both sides of AND will not be small. That’s the one thing I’m sure of.”
Israel-Iran conflict escalates Russell ‘9 (James, Senior lecturer in the Department of National Security Affairs at NPS, Strategic Stability Reconsidered: Prospects for Escalation and Nuclear War in the Middle East. Proliferation Papers, 2009)
America’s disapproval of Israeli pre-emption may reflect a reduced national appetite for military AND centers by Hezbollah rockets in Southern Lebanon could also trigger an escalation spiral.
Caucus wars go nuclear Blank ‘99 (Stephen, Director of Strategic Studies Institute at US Army War College, “Every Shark East of Suez: Great Power Interests, Policies and Tactics in the Transcaspian Energy Wars”, Central Asian Survey (18; 2),)
Past experience suggests Moscow will even threaten a Third World War if there is Turkish AND or the so-called arc of crisis from the Balkans to China.
Second- China and Asian drone wars Brimley et al 9/17 (Shawn Brimley, Ben Fitzgerald, Ely Ratner, Shawn Brimley, Ben FitzGerald, and Ely Ratner are, respectively, vice president, director of the Technology and National Security Program, and deputy director of the Asia Program at the Center for a New American Security, Foreign Policy, “The Drone War Comes to Asia”, http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2013/09/17/the_drone_war_comes_to_asia, September 17, 2013)
How China sparked a dangerous unmanned arms race. It's now been a year since AND political leadership, these technologies could very well lead the region into war.
Taiwan is the most likely potential crisis that could trigger a nuclear war between China AND uncertain endeavor, could be especially difficult in any conflict,” it says.
Contention {Z}: Solvency Congress should restrict the use of remote controlled aerial vehicle targeted killings outside of geographic locations housing active American combat troops.
That solves- the executive branch being the arbiter is the problem Brooks ‘13 (Rosa Brooks is a law professor at Georgetown University and a Schwartz senior fellow at the New America Foundation. She served as a counselor to the U.S. defense undersecretary for policy from 2009 to 2011 and previously served as a senior advisor at the U.S. State Department, 2013, “The Constitutional and Counterterrorism Implications of Targeted Killing Testimony Before the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Human Rights April 23, 2013”, http://www.lawfareblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Brooks_05-16-13.pdf- see the Appendix)
Here is an additional reason to worry about the U.S. overreliance on AND them to justify the killing of dissidents, rivals, or unwanted minorities?
Legislative restrictions prevent circumvention Barron ‘8 (Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and Martin S. Lederman, Visiting Professor of Law at the Georgetown University Law Center (David J. Barron, “The Commander in Chief at the Lowest Ebb -- A Constitutional History”, Harvard Law Review, February, 121 Harv. L. Rev. 941, Lexis)
In addition to offering important guidance concerning the congressional role, our historical review also AND the executive branch itself for most of our history of war powers development.
Congress key --- self-restraint HURTS Obama’s credibility- seen as continuing to circumvent Congress Goldsmith ’13 (Jack Goldsmith, Henry L. Shattuck Professor at Harvard Law School, where he teaches and writes about national security law, presidential power, cybersecurity, international law, internet law, foreign relations law, and conflict of laws. Before coming to Harvard, Professor Goldsmith served as Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal Counsel from 2003-2004, and Special Counsel to the Department of Defense from 2002-2003, “How Obama Undermined the War on Terror The President promised not to undercut the rule of law for expedience's sake. He did. Now we face the consequences”, http://www.newrepublic.com/article/112964/obamas-secrecy-destroying-american-support-counterterrorism, May 1, 2013)
Questions grew when the administration continued to withhold legal memos from Congress, and when AND for which he alone is today responsible, is increasingly viewed as illegitimate.
10/26/13
Geography Affirmative 1AC
Tournament: Kentucky Round Robin | Round: 7 | Opponent: MSU TR | Judge: Adri Brov Affirmative vs. MSU
Advantage {X}: Drone Failure 1/
Drone strikes are causing instability and terrorist backlash in Pakistan - creating a failed state syndrome and killing relations Rohde ’12 (David Rohde, American author and investigative journalist for Thomson Reuters. While a reporter for The Christian Science Monitor, he won the Pulitzer Prize for International Reporting in 1996 for his coverage of the Srebrenica massacre. From July 2002 until December 2004, he was co-chief of The New York Times' South Asia bureau, based in New Delhi, India. He shared a second Pulitzer Prize for Times 2008 team coverage of Afghanistan and Pakistan, While in Afghanistan, Rohde was kidnapped by members of the Taliban in November 2008, but managed to escape in June 2009 after seven months in captivity, “How Obama’s drone war is backfiring”, http://blogs.reuters.com/david-rohde/2012/03/01/how-obamas-drone-war-is-backfiring/, March/April issue of Foreign Policy, March 1, 2012) When Barack Obama took the oath of office three years ago, no one associated AND he asked me. “I don’t think we’ve answered that question yet.” ? Pakistan collapse causes nuclear war Pitt ‘9 (William, a New York Times and internationally bestselling author of two books: "War on Iraq: What Team Bush Doesn't Want You to Know" and "The Greatest Sedition Is Silence.", “Unstable Pakistan Threatens the World,” http://www.arabamericannews.com/news/index.php?mod=articleandcat=commentaryandarticle=2183, May 8, 2009) But a suicide bomber in Pakistan rammed a car packed with explosives into a jeep AND to be gravely serious about addressing the situation. So should we all. ? Yemen instability causes terrorist to strike India Roychowdhury ‘11 (Gen. Shankar Roychowdhury is a former Chief of Army Staff and a former member of Parliament, “India needs a 360° terror appraisal”, Deccan Chronicle, http://www.deccanchronicle.com/editorial/dc-comment/india-needs-360C2B0-terror-appraisal-659, September 6, 2011) In this context, Al Qaeda and its emerging connections in Yemen have become very AND take due note of other threats as well and exercise the requisite caution.
Terrorist attack on India causes Indo-Pak war- escalates Zarate ’11 (Juan C. Zarate, “An alarming South Asia powder keg”, Washington Post, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/02/18/AR2011021805662.html, February 20, 2011) In 1914, a terrorist assassinated Archduke Franz Ferdinand in Sarajevo - unleashing geopolitical forces AND for broader geopolitical crises may be the greatest threat we face from terrorism. ? The plan is key to effective drone usage-
1) Host Country-
Ending drones key to host country cooperation Streeter ’13 (Devin C. Streeter, Helms School Of Government, Liberty University “Boko Haram, Drone Policy, And Port Security: Issues For Congress”, http://www.academia.edu/3523639/U.S._Drone_Policy_Tactical_Success_and_Strategic_Failure, April 19, 2013) A new set of drone operating procedures would help to repair international relations and decrease AND agenda, for the purpose of improving foreign policy and repairing international relations.
Host country cooperation key Cordesman ’13 (Anthony Cordesman, Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy at CSIS, “The Common Lessons of Benghazi, Algeria, Mali, Tunisia, Egypt, Syria, Iraq, Yemen, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and the Arab Spring”, http://csis.org/publication/common-lessons-benghazi-algeria-mali-tunisia-egypt-syria-iraq-yemen-afghanistan-pakistan, January 28, 2013) Working with Regional and Host Country Partners The third lesson is that in most cases AND , as will support to regional security structures like the Gulf Cooperation Council. ? 2) The plan shifts the CIA to focus to intel – key to drone effectiveness Anderson ’13 (Kenneth Anderson, Professor of law at Washington College of Law, American University; a visiting fellow of the Hoover Institution and member of its Task Force on National Security and Law; and a non-resident senior fellow of the Brookings Institution. He writes on international law, the laws of war, and national security, and his most recent book is "Living with the UN: American Responsibilities and International Order.", “Taking the CIA Out of Drone Strikes? The Obama Administration’s Yemen Experience”, http://www.lawfareblog.com/2013/05/taking-the-cia-out-of-drone-strikes-the-obama-administrations-yemen-experience/, May 28, 2013) Washington Post national security reporter Greg Miller has an excellent story in Sunday’s paper on AND some cautions about how easy it is to create this division of labor.
3) Over-reliance on drones causes failed policy Schwartz ’13 (Bernard L. Schwartz, Senior Fellow New America Foundation, Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center, “The Constitutional and Counterterrorism Implications of Targeted Killing Testimony Before the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Human Rights”, April 23, 2013)
3. The true costs of current US drone policy When we come to rely AND it, drone strikes remain “a tactic in search of a strategy.”
The first category of nations, while not targeted by drone strikes, is intimidated AND Europe are to be fixed, a change in drone protocol is needed.
Advantage {Y}: Sovereignty Violations
Unrestrained executive drone policy violates sovereignty claims and undermines rule of law- sends a global signal Schwartz ’13 (Bernard L. Schwartz, Senior Fellow New America Foundation, Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center, “The Constitutional and Counterterrorism Implications of Targeted Killing Testimony Before the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Human Rights”, April 23, 2013) Once you take targeted killings outside hot battlefields, it’s a different story . The AND are they , as some human rights groups have argued, unlawful murder?
Drones outside battlefield specifically causes aggressive arms race based off of US modeling Bergen and Rowland ’12 Peter Bergen, director of the National Security Studies Program at the New America Foundation, a research fellow at New York University's Center on Law and Security and CNN's national security analyst, former adjunct lecturer at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University and an Adjunct Professor at the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins University, CNN National Security analyst, and Jennifer Rowland, research associate at the New America Foundation, “A dangerous new world of drones,” http://www.cnn.com/2012/10/01/opinion/bergen-world-of-drones/index.html A decade ago, the United States had a virtual monopoly on drones. Not AND the future as much as tanks and bombers did during the 20th century.
This “world as a battlefield” precedent risk accidental miscalc that escalates Dowd ’13 (Alan Dowd, Writes on national defense, foreign policy, and international security. His writing has appeared in multiple publications including Parameters, Policy Review, The Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations, World Politics Review, American Outlook, The Baltimore Sun, The Washington Times, The National Post, The Wall Street Journal Europe, The Jerusalem Post, and The Financial Times Deutschland. He holds a B.A. with high honors from Butler University and an M.A. from Indiana University, “Drone Wars: Risks and Warnings”, http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/parameters/Issues/WinterSpring_2013/1_Article_Dowd.pdf, Winter/Spring 2013) First, if the battlespace is the entire earth, the enemy would seem to AND spawned a new era of danger for the United States and its allies.
Breaks down deterrence Boyle ‘13 Michael J. Boyle, PhD, is an Assistant Professor of Political Science at La Salle University in Philadelphia. He was previously a Lecturer in International Relations and Research Fellow at the Centre for the Study of Terrorism and Political Violence at the University of St. Andrews. He is also an alumnus of the Political Science Department at La Salle, research interests are on terrorism and political violence, with particular reference to the strategic use of violence in insurgencies and civil wars, “The costs and consequences of drone warfare,” International Affairs 89: 1 (2013) 1–29, http://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/public/International20Affairs/2013/89_1/89_1Boyle.pdf, 2013 The emergence of this arms race for drones raises at least five long-term AND the legal and evidentiary difficulties associated with giving them a fair trial.147
Independently- Executive uncertainty of US Drone policy cause accident and escalatory wars Dean ‘13 Adriana, degree from the University of Southern California in Philosophy, Politics and Law, Chapter Officer of Young Americans for Liberty, an organization with over 125,000 members nationwide, “Targeted Killings Behind the Veil of Ignorance,” http://www.academia.edu/3832442/Targeted_Killings_Behind_the_Veil_of_Ignorance While there are some justifiable points for the targeted killing program that individuals behind the AND haunt not only the executive, but the United States as a whole.
Israel-Iran conflict escalates Russell ‘9 (James, Senior lecturer in the Department of National Security Affairs at NPS, Strategic Stability Reconsidered: Prospects for Escalation and Nuclear War in the Middle East. Proliferation Papers, 2009) America’s disapproval of Israeli pre-emption may reflect a reduced national appetite for military AND centers by Hezbollah rockets in Southern Lebanon could also trigger an escalation spiral.
Caucus wars go nuclear Blank ‘99 (Stephen, Director of Strategic Studies Institute at US Army War College, “Every Shark East of Suez: Great Power Interests, Policies and Tactics in the Transcaspian Energy Wars”, Central Asian Survey (18; 2),) Past experience suggests Moscow will even threaten a Third World War if there is Turkish AND or the so-called arc of crisis from the Balkans to China.
Contention {Z}: Solvency
Congress should permit remote controlled aerial vehicle targeted killings only under purposes of self-defense to geographic locations housing active American combat troops
That solves without hamstringing presidential power or military capabilities Brooks ’13 (Rosa Brooks is a law professor at Georgetown University and a Schwartz senior fellow at the New America Foundation. She served as a counselor to the U.S. defense undersecretary for policy from 2009 to 2011 and previously served as a senior advisor at the U.S. State Department, 2013, “The Law of Armed Conflict, the Use of Military Force, and the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force May 16, 2013 Statement for the Record Submitted the Senate Committee on Armed Services”, http://www.lawfareblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Brooks_05-16-13.pdf, May 16, 2013) For this reason, I believe that if Congress wishes to refine or clarify the AND principles of self-defense rather than by the law of armed conflict.
All relevant officials will comply with the plan Goldsmith ’12 Jack Goldsmith is a Harvard Law professor and a member of the Hoover Task Force on National Security and Law. He served in the Bush administration as assistant attorney general in charge of the Office of Legal Counsel, “Fire When Ready,” 3-19-12, http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2012/03/19/fire_when_ready?page=full, March 19, 2012 When the Obama administration made the decision to kill Awlaki, it did not rely AND inclination to do so, and it appears to support the current arrangement.
Obama will comply --- the plan walks the fine-line --- failure to walk the constitution is worse Barron ‘8 (Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and Martin S. Lederman, Visiting Professor of Law at the Georgetown University Law Center (David J. Barron, “The Commander in Chief at the Lowest Ebb -- A Constitutional History”, Harvard Law Review, February, 121 Harv. L. Rev. 941, Lexis) In addition to offering important guidance concerning the congressional role, our historical review also AND the executive branch itself for most of our history of war powers development.
Congress key --- self-restraint HURTS Obama’s credibility- seen as continuing to circumvent Congress Goldsmith ’13 (Jack Goldsmith, Henry L. Shattuck Professor at Harvard Law School, where he teaches and writes about national security law, presidential power, cybersecurity, international law, internet law, foreign relations law, and conflict of laws. Before coming to Harvard, Professor Goldsmith served as Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal Counsel from 2003-2004, and Special Counsel to the Department of Defense from 2002-2003, “How Obama Undermined the War on Terror The President promised not to undercut the rule of law for expedience's sake. He did. Now we face the consequences”, http://www.newrepublic.com/article/112964/obamas-secrecy-destroying-american-support-counterterrorism, May 1, 2013) Questions grew when the administration continued to withhold legal memos from Congress, and when AND for which he alone is today responsible, is increasingly viewed as illegitimate.
This white paper sets forth a legal framework for considering lethal force in a foreign country against a U.S. citizen, who is a force of al-Qa’ida planning to kill Americans. Congress authorized the President to use all necessary force against those entities. See AUMF. The President’s use of force is lawful under U.S. and international law, including constitutional responsibility to protect the nation and national self-defense. See, e.g., U.N. Charter art. 51. A U.S. citizen would not alter this conclusion. See Hamdi. Ex Parte Quirin. The U S is in a non-international armed conflict with al-Qa’ida. See Hamdan, quoting Article 3 of Geneva. It would be lawful for the U S to conduct lethal operation under the following conditions: (1) the U.S. government has determined that the individual poses an imminent threat (2) capture is infeasible and (3) the operation is consistent with the laws of war
That was a secret White House memo that got leaked in 2013
This law of targeted killing can only be understood as a function of contingent practice —— we have scholarly obligations to utilize this 1AC to discuss how we bring that knowledge into play through a re-reading of the law and the method to change law
Krasmann 12—prof. Dr, Institute for Criminological Research, University of Hamburg ~added the word "the" for correct sentence structure—denoted by brackets~ (Susanne, "Targeted Killing and Its Law: On a Mutually Constitutive Relationship", Leiden Journal of International Law (2012), 25, pp. 665–682, dml)
It was only with President Barack Obama’s ’drone program’30 that targeted killing operations were AND norms proves to be a tool for introducing a new reading of law.
Adv 2
Thus,
Advocacy Statement: Lee and I believe the United States Federal Government’s legal authority for targeted killing should be repudiated
Repudiation is key —— the authority to conduct drone strikes is the most problematic
LEMIEUX 2013 - assistant professor of political science at the College of Saint Rose (Scott Lemieux, "Three Questions Obama Needs to Answer in His Speech", http://prospect.org/article/three-questions-obama-needs-answer-his-speech) The first question Obama should clearly answer is where the administration derives the authority to AND announce a shift away from the use of military attacks to right terrorism.
This is contention 2: the global is now the local
Our advocacy begins with a criticism of drones —— the argument is not that drones are the only way to create effective discussion surrounding violence and oppression, but it is ONE important starting method21 Specifically, this discussion is critical to further interrogate the post-colonial legacy that the US military complex perpetrates
As scholars, the discussions and knowledge we produce about the impacts of drones are key because epistemological debates create law vis-à-vis how law re-creates knowledge —— this discussion reveals the manner in which drones become a prosthetic between the human and non-human, analyzing the complex nature behind the drone system, operator, and victims
CHANDLER 2012 - Ph.D. Candidate, University of California, Berkeley (Chandler, Katherine, "5,000 FEET IS THE BEST: RE-VIEWING THE POLITICS OF UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEMS")
ACRONYM NOTE: *UAS = Unmanned Aerial Systems* Operators far from the battlefield in Afghanistan used a satellite data- link to remotely AND to social forms, at once, personal, political, and intercultural.
Our aff is an attempt to recognize the way that drones operate as a product of coloniality, an alternative which attempts to know the world through identity can never be accurate why it is we bomb light-skinned, brown citizens in Yemen but don’t bomb in dark-skinned so-called terrorists in Mali
The drones have changed what it means to produce knowledge —— it demonstrates that the distinction between the body and technology are about to disappear. Absent a more global, post-colonial analysis into the drone system, any project to resuscitate politics will fail. If it’s true that debate constellates our political subjectivity, then we need to better understand and challenge the system that produces that subjectivity in the first place. The prosthetic of drones have bracketed off geographical spaces, which has enabled the extermination of both indigenous Americans and the global periphery—— identity has become flattened to streams of information understood only through signatures and patterns of life, which has changed the game of violence as we know it
PUGLIESE 2013 – Native American Scholar, Associate Professor of Cultural Studies at Macquarie University (Pugliese, Joseph. State Violence and the Execution of Law: Biopolitical Caesurae of Torture, Black Sites, Drones. Routledge, 2013) The categories of law and technology would seem to be at once non- interchangeable AND , past and present, that have harrowed the homelands of Native Americans.
Voting aff combines the best of both worlds —- we should synthesize modern notions of solidarity, alliances, consensus, universal rights, macropolitics and institutional struggle with postmodern notions of difference, plurality, multiperspectivalism, identity, and micropolitics
(A) The alternative to this synthesis is a conservative version of liberalism and identity politics crowding out the debates over drones —— both are complicit with drone strikes —— we need a strong coalition of stakeholders in the community to challenge the drone empire
The Obama administration has erected a vast apparatus of global assassination involving unmanned aerial drones AND the Obama administration, the Democratic Party and its "left" apologists.
(B) The answer is not a reactionary rejection of either liberalism and identity politics whole-heartedly, but an epistemological intervention that can negotiate those tensions can better give us the tools to navigate the social world —— liberalism is here to stay, but utilizing a global frame to challenge its more local, problematic materializations can help create coalitions for a better future to come
BEST AND KELLNER 1998 – Steven Best is an associate prof of philosophy at Univ. of Texas AND* Douglas Kellner is chair in philosophy of education at UCLA (Best, Steven. Douglas Kellner, "Postmodern Politics and the Battle for the Future," Illuminations, http://www.uta.edu/huma/illuminations/kell28.htm)
The postmodern turn which has so marked social and cultural theory also involves conflicts between AND world postmodern politics have affixed themselves to new social movements and localized struggles. The emphasis on local struggles and micropower, cultural politics which redefine the political, AND politics of alliance and solidarity equal to the challenges of the coming millennium.
Elsea et al ’13 (Jennifer K. Elsea, Legislative Attorney; Michael John Garcia, Legislative Attorney; Thomas J. Nicola, Legislative Attorney; CRS Report for Congress, "Congressional Authority to Limit Military Operations", http://fpc.state.gov/documents/organization/206121.pdf, February 19, 2013) The Purpose Statute states that funds may be used only for purposes for which they AND the amount— zero—that Congress has appropriated for the prohibited purpose.
No motivation- Obama already conformed us to UNCLOS (and the plan is popular, others push the aff, and other treaties thump the DA)
Block 13 (Ben- taff writer with the Worldwatch Institute, "U.S. Leaders Support Law of the Sea Treaty", http://www.worldwatch.org/node/5993)** During last week’s Cabinet confirmation hearings, leaders in both the U.S. AND groups, and the mining, fishing, shipping, and telecommunications industries.
Exposing secrecy and furthering public engagement through the 1AC resolves Glennon
ACLU 14, Privacy SOS campaign from Massachusetts ACLU, "When it comes to fighting the ’double state’, knowledge is power", 1/20, http://privacysos.org/node/1304 As Glennon argues in the Harvard National Security Journal, the danger in the United AND , no matter what the Bill of Rights has to say about it.
Plan: The United States federal government should increase statutory restrictions on the President of the United States’ war power authority to introduce naval forces into hostilities by codifying the appropriate articles of the Law of the Sea Treaty.
Contention 1- China
South China sea conflict coming now- naval disputes- firebrand nationalist are taking control of Chinese foreign policy
Smith 14 (Jeff is the director of South Asia Programs and the Kraemer Strategy Fellow at the American Foreign Policy Council in Washington, D.C., 1/15, "Drawing a Red Line for China", http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/world-report/2014/01/15/us-must-draw-red-line-for-china-in-the-western-pacific)** In recent months, the world’s attention has been focused on China’s provocative behavior in AND S. to be a firewall against Chinese aggression in the Western Pacific.
No defense- nuclear escalation is guaranteed
Klare 13 — (Michael, professor of peace and world security studies at Hampshire College, "The Next War", Realclearworld.com, January 23, 2013, http://www.realclearworld.com/articles/2013/01/23/the_next_war_100500.html) Don’t look now, but conditions are deteriorating in the western Pacific. Things are AND planet will look with sadness and horror on the failure of everyone involved.
Taiwan is the most likely potential crisis that could trigger a nuclear war between China AND uncertain endeavor, could be especially difficult in any conflict," it says.
The balancing and hedging strategy should involve options to avoid what Traub rightfully describes as AND quo. Not doing so, we fear, would lead to Armageddon.
Contention 2- Arctic
Scenario one is border conflict
Arctic border disputes go nuclear
Wallace and Staples 10 (Michael Wallace and Steven Staples. *Professor Emeritus at the University of British Columbia and President of the Rideau Institute in Ottawa "Ridding the Arctic of Nuclear Weapons: A Task Long Overdue,"http://www.arcticsecurity.org/docs/arctic-nuclear-report-web.pdf) The fact is, the Arctic is becoming a zone of increased military competition. AND -political/economic significance of the Arctic because of climate change." 62
Realism defines these energy escalations
Stephan et al. ’11 (Hannes R. Stephan, John Vogler, and Fariborz Zelli, "Energy Security and Climate Security: Synergy or Conflict?", Paper presented at the Third Global International Studies Conference (17-20 August 2011, Porto, Portugal), August 17-20, 2011)
Historically, realist theoretical assumptions have dominated thinking on energy security. Widespread recognition of AND the costs – could achieve a degree of autarchy in this sector too.
Scenario two is the Environment
Arctic overfishing leads to arctic cod extinction- they are a keystone species
PEW 10 (Environmental group studying northern oceans, "COMMERCIAL FISHING", http://www.oceansnorth.org/commercial-fishing**)** Fortunately, the North American Arctic has largely been spared this legacy of overfishing, AND Conservation Alliance (organization representing 60 percent of Bering Sea Commercial fishing industry)
Keystone species loss results in an avalanche affect- collapses overall biod
That outweighs your impacts- guarantees extinction and is irreversible
Chen 2k—Professor of Law and Vance K. Opperman Research Scholar, University of Minnesota Law School (Jim, Globalization and Its Losers, Winter 2000, 9 Minn. J. Global Trade 157, Lexis) Ellipses in original
Conscious decisions to allow the extinction of a species or the destruction of an entire AND Homo sapiens — in ten million years, perhaps a hundred million. 348
Causes risks food wars
Roughhead 11 – US Navy Four Star Admiral (Gary, quoted in "Changes in the Arctic: Background and Issues for Congress", 6/15/12; original statement made 6/20/11; http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41153.pdf)//AB The U.S. Navy’s interests in the Arctic are not new, of AND and when to build forces capable and competent for the harsh northern climes.
Those escalate
CRIBB 2010 (Julian, Julian Cribb is a science communicator, journalist and editor AND crisis and what we can do to avoid it," p. 26) This is the most likely means by which the coming famine will affect all citizens AND widening gap between food and energy supplies and peoples’ need to secure them.
Independently- Arctic ecosystem collapse leads to extinction
WWF 2010 (December 1, 2010 "Drilling for Oil in the Arctic: Too Soon, Too Risky" World Wildlife Fund http://www.worldwildlife.org/what/wherewework/arctic/WWFBinaryitem18711.pdf) Planetary Keystone The Arctic and the subarctic regions surrounding it are important for many reasons AND of climate change, the Arctic is a keystone ecosystem for the entire planet
Neglect of the environment causes extinction- some management key
Soule ’95 (Michael E., Professor and Chair of Environmental Studies, UC-Santa Cruz, REINVITING NATURE? RESPONSES TO POSTMODERN DECONSTRUCTION, Eds: Michael E. Soule and Gary Lease, p. 159-160)
Should We Actively Manage Wildlands and Wild Waters? The decision has already been made AND So if we must manage, where do we look for ethical guidance?
Contention 3- Solvency
Solves China-
Having a seat at EEZ disputes is key to solve China and freedom of navigation laws solves the reason for escalation- codification independently solves Asian arms races
Glaser 12 (Bonnie S. Glaser, Senior Fellow, Center for Strategic and International Studies, April, "Armed Clash in the South China Sea", http://www.cfr.org/world/armed-clash-south-china-sea/p27883)** The risk of conflict in the South China Sea is significant. China, Taiwan AND and global issues and more tightly integrate China into the prevailing international system.
There are no alt causes- EEZ disputes necessary and sufficient to prevent conflict- SCS resolution is key to overall LOST credibility
Bower and Poling 12 (Ernest Z- Senior Adviser and Sumitro Chair for Southeast Asia Studies CSIS, Gregory B- Fellow, Sumitro Chair for Southeast Asia Studies and Pacific Partners Initiative CSIS, May 25, "Advancing the National Interests of the United States: Ratification of the Law of the Sea", http://csis.org/publication/advancing-national-interests-united-states-ratification-law-sea)** The credibility of the United States in the Asia Pacific is at stake on a AND is more like the competitive free-for-all of the nineteenth.
Specifically- China is claiming it’s EEZ policies through Article 301 of LOST
David 10 (Conrad- Captain US Navy, "Lawfare in the Near Seas: How China’s Maritime Claims Impact Regional Security", pdf) The PRC often cites the provisions of UNCLOS that it feels are to the coastal AND 301 of the Convention, but also a violation of Article 300." 31
Codification is key to prevent ambiguity over article 301- US lead key
David 10 (Conrad- Captain US Navy, "Lawfare in the Near Seas: How China’s Maritime Claims Impact Regional Security", pdf) Lastly, while it has long operated within its dictates of the law of the AND by freedom loving nations to preserve freedoms of navigation and overflight going forward.
Solves Arctic disputes-
Codification is key to resolve Arctic border and Northwest Passage sovereignty disputes, overfishing, and arctic ecosystem collapse
Huebert 9 (Rob- Associate Professor, Department of Political Science¶ University of Calgary, May, "THE RELUCTANT¶ ARCTIC POWER", pdf) The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) is the AND could soon¶ collapse. It is unclear how to resolve the situation.
Smith 11~Reginald, Militray Professor in National Security Studies, Colonel, Masters in National Security and strategic Studies from U.S. Naval War College, "The Arctic A New Partnership Paradigm or Next ’Cold War’?", 2011, pdf~ The significance of the declaration is paramount to cooperation in that UNCLOS provides the international AND in the region are those available through military collaboration of the Arctic nations.
Plan: The United States federal government should increase statutory restrictions on the President of the United States’ war power authority to introduce naval forces into hostilities by codifying the appropriate articles of the Law of the Sea Treaty.
LOST Codification is key to credibility- voluntary adherence makes your DA’s non-unique, and the executive CP is the status quo
Glaser 12 (Bonnie S. Glaser, Senior Fellow, Center for Strategic and International Studies, April, "Armed Clash in the South China Sea", http://www.cfr.org/world/armed-clash-south-china-sea/p27883)** First, the United States should ratify UNCLOS; though it voluntarily adheres to its AND rights, and generally advance U.S. economic and strategic interests.
The plan adopts a Madisonian approach to international treaties- allows us to get the seat at LOST tribunal discussions over navigational rights, but doesn’t bind us into the bad parts of treaties
Kyl 12 (Jon- United States Senator, June 4, "The Perils of Global Governance¶ Jon Kyl¶ United States Senator¶ Conference on Global Governance and the Challenge to the U.S. Constitution¶ American Enterprise Institute", pdf) I want to emphasize that this view does not arise out of any aversion on AND contributing its practices and legal opinions on the law of¶ the sea.
The plan is the necessary starting point to resolve coastal states concerns and remedy EEZ disputes- total ratification isn’t needed
Beckman and Davenport 12 (Robert Beckman is the Director, Centre for International Law (CIL)¶ and Associate Professor, Faculty of Law, National University of¶ Singapore (NUS), Singapore; Tara Davenport is a Research Fellow,¶ Centre for International Law (CIL), Faculty of Law, National¶ University of Singapore (NUS), Singapore, May, "Securing the Ocean for the Next Generation", pdf) However, it is also fair to say that some coastal States such as Brazil AND military activities, such as reconnaissance on naval assets or coastal¶ defenses.
Williams 3/27 (Andrew Williams, Andrew W. Williams is a partner with McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert 26 Berghoff LLP. Dr. Williams’ practice primarily consists of patent litigation, prosecution, and opinion work in the areas of biotechnology, pharmaceuticals, and chemistry., Dr. Williams is a contributing author to the Patent Docs weblog, a site focusing on biotechnology and pharmaceutical patent law, "Senate Judiciary Committee Takes Up, Then Tables, Patent Reform", http://www.patentdocs.org/2014/03/senate-judiciary-committee-takes-up-then-tables-patent-reform.html, March 27, 2014)
Earlier today, the Senate Committee on the Judiciary held an Executive Business Meeting in AND progress of this bill, and any amendments that are made to it.
THAT MEANS Link uniqueness shapes uniqueness – not issue specific uniqueness
Galen, 3-17 – former Press Secretary for the Speaker of the House ~Rich, "Obama is Poisonous," Real Clear Politics, 3-17-14, www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2014/03/17/obama_is_poisonous_121954.html, accessed 3-20-14~
There is not much statistical difference between an approval rating of 42 and 39 ( AND identified, said Mr. Obama was becoming ’poisonous’ to the party’s candidates."
Especially true on fights over war powers- rally around the flag
Werner, 7 — University of Wisconsin-Madison political science professor ~Timothy, Ph.D. in Political Science from University of Wisconsin–Madison and Peter Holm, UWM political science, "Political Capital and Presidential War Powers: Sources of Congressional Assertiveness on the Use of Force," March 2007, users.polisci.wisc.edu/Holm/uof-march2007-draft.pdf, accessed 2-5-14~
At the same time, the pressures on members to support the president in his AND but the taboo against withdrawing support from troops in the field remains intense.
We control uniqueness- Obama’s approval is below 50; dems are avoiding him
Friedman, 14 — NY Daily News staff ~Dan, "As Obama’s approval rating slips, Democrats are avoiding him," NY Daily News, 2-24-14, www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/obama-negative-approval-rating-dems-ducking-article-1.1700590, accessed 3-9-14~
As Obama’s approval rating slips, Democrats are avoiding him Dems dodge Obama, whose AND Democrats hope to gain seats. Obama lost all those states in 2012.
That’s key- 50 approval is try or die for Obama’s agenda
SENATE JUDICIARY DELAYS PATENT MARKUP: The committee Thursday delayed the long-awaited markup AND for his part, said he would continue fighting for the controversial measure.
No litigation explosion AND reform fails- not enough data and bill fails
-addresses the wrong issue - there’s not enough data to get the solution right Merritt, 3-12 – EE Times news correspondent, Silicon Valley bureau chief; citing Daniel F. Spulber, research director of Northwestern University’s Searle Center on Law ~Rick, "Patent Data Missing in Troll Debate," EE Times, 3-12-14, http://www.eetimes.com/document.asp?doc_id=132136426_mc=MP_IW_EDT_STUB, accessed 3-13-14~
Patent Data Missing In Troll Debate Congress and the Supreme Court are poised to take action on patent suits, but AND blue) in the 1991-2011 period, the GAO report said.
XOs solve
Kash, 3-3 — InformationWeek Government editor ~Wyatt, "Vowing to combat patent trolls, the White House recently announced a series of executive actions," 3-3-14, InformationWeek, www.informationweek.com/government/leadership/patent-reform-tech-firms-attorneys-weigh-in/d/d-id/1114070, accessed 3-13-14~ Among other measures, the White House and the USPTO: • established new educational AND art, to try to resolve disputes before they turn into costly lawsuits.
AT: Losers Lose
Loser’s lose is wrong- dems and GOP feed a false narrative- there’s an epistemology disad to their arguments
Beutler, 13 — Salon staff writer ~Brian, "GOP’s massive new lie: The truth about Obama’s second term," Salon, 9/9/13, www.salon.com/2013/09/09/syria_wont_derail_obamas_second_term_house_republicans_will/, accessed 3-29-14~
It’s factually and morally wrong to say his agenda is doomed if war vote loses AND or a farm bill, or a budget deal, or anything else.
2AC – Methane Thumper
Backlash against Obama over emissions annoucnement
Roberta Rampton and Timothy Gardner (writers for Reuters) March 28, 2014 "Obama considers new climate regulations for oil, gas sector" http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/03/28/us-usa-climatechange-obama-idUSBREA2R10P20140328 The White House said on Friday it will take a hard look at whether new AND wells on public lands, one way to begin cutting emissions of methane.
2AC- Weak Now
Backlash now against Obama’s anti-terror policies
The Washington Post 3/27/14 (Jennifer Rubin, "Bipartisan Second-Thoughts on National Security") There are signs of a bipartisan pushback against the passive foreign policy and hostility to AND , and they’re not grateful to him for giving them what they want."
2AC – IMF Thumper
IMF reform thumps losers lose
Wiesman, 3-25 – NY Times congressional reporter ~Jonathan, "Senate Democrats Drop I.M.F. Reforms From Ukraine Aid," NY Times, 3-25-14, www.nytimes.com/2014/03/26/world/europe/senate-democrats-drop-imf-reforms-from-ukraine-aid-package.html, accessed 3-26-14~
Democrats, bowing to united House Republican opposition, dropped reforms of International Monetary Fund AND the Republican leader. "I agree with these two important House Democrats.
2AC – NSA
NSA reform triggers the link
Cohen, 3-25 — CNN ~Tom, Lisa Desjardins, and Jim Acosta, "Obama, Congress working on changes to NSA," CNN, 3-2-14, www.cnn.com/2014/03/25/politics/white-house-nsa/, accessed 3-26-14~
President Barack Obama and congressional leaders described similar proposals Tuesday for ending the National Security AND current system was legal, but needed changing to reassure a skeptical public.
2AC – Immigration
Obama immigration order triggers the link- thumps prez powers args
Gomez, 3-23 — USA Today ~Alan, "Obama ’humane’ order roils immigration debate," WTSP News, 3-23-14, www.wtsp.com/story/news/nation-now/2014/03/23/obama-humane-deportation-order-immigration-debate/6787289/, accessed 3-26-14~
Obama ’humane’ order roils immigration debate President Obama’s recent order to his administration to find ways to deport people living in AND through federal courts about the limits of presidential power that goes back decades.
Epoch Times: Mr. Schiff, what’s your view on the U.S AND from? It’s coming from the productive efforts of people outside of America.
1NC/ 2AC- Nuclear Primacy
No scenario for losing deterrence
Kristensen ’12 — FAS nuclear weapons expert ~Hans, "DOD: Strategic Stability Not Threatened Even by Greater Russian Nuclear Forces," FAS, 10-10-12, www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2012/10/strategicstability.php, accessed 1-27-13, mss~
DOD: Strategic Stability Not Threatened Even by Greater Russian Nuclear Forces A Department of Defense (DOD) report on Russian nuclear forces, conducted in coordination with the Director of National Intelligence and sent to Congress in May 2012, concludes that even the most worst-case scenario of a Russian surprise disarming first strike against the United States would have "little to no effect" on the U.S. ability to retaliate with a devastating strike against Russia. I know, even thinking about scenarios such as this sounds like an echo from the Cold War, but the Obama administration has actually come under attack from some for considering further reductions of U.S. nuclear forces when Russia and others are modernizing their forces. The point would be, presumably, that reducing while others are modernizing would somehow give them an advantage over the United States. But the DOD report concludes that Russia "would not be able to achieve a militarily significant advantage by any plausible expansion of its strategic nuclear forces, even in a cheating or breakout scenario under the New START Treaty" (emphasis added). The conclusions are important because the report come after Vladimir Putin earlier this year announced plans to produce "over 400" new nuclear missiles during the next decade. Putin’s plan follows the Obama administration’s plan to spend more than 24200 billion over the next decade to modernize U.S. strategic forces and weapons factories. The conclusions may also hint at some of the findings of the Obama administration’s ongoing (but delayed and secret) review of U.S. nuclear targeting policy. No Effects on Strategic Stability The DOD report – Report on the Strategic Nuclear Forces of the Russian Federation Pursuant to Section 1240 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 – was obtained under the Freedom of Information Act. It describes the U.S. intelligence community’s projection for the likely development of Russian nuclear forces through 2017 and 2022, the timelines of the New START Treaty, and possible implications for U.S. national security and strategic stability. Much of the report’s content was deleted before release – including general and widely reported factual information about Russian nuclear weapons systems that is not classified. But the important concluding section that describes the effects of possible shifts in the number and composition of Russian nuclear forces on strategic stability was released in its entirety. The section "Effects on Strategic Stability" begins by defining that stability in the strategic nuclear relationship between the United States and the Russian Federation depends upon the assured capability of each side to deliver a sufficient number of nuclear warheads to inflict unacceptable damage on the other side, even with an opponent attempting a disarming first strike. Consequently, the report concludes, "the only Russian shift in its nuclear forces that could undermine the basic framework of mutual deterrence that exists between the United States and the Russian Federation is a scenario that enables Russia to deny the United States the assured ability to respond against a substantial number of highly valued Russian targets following a Russian attempt at a disarming first strike" (emphasis added). The DOD concludes that such a first strike scenario "will most likely not occur." But even if it did and Russia deployed additional strategic warheads to conduct a disarming first strike, even significantly above the New START Treaty limits, DOD concludes that it "would have little to no effects on the U.S. assured second-strike capabilities that underwrite our strategic deterrence posture" (emphasis added). In fact, the DOD report states, the "Russian Federation…would not be able to achieve a militarily significant advantage by any plausible expansion of its strategic nuclear forces, even in a cheating or breakout scenario under the New START Treaty, primarily because of the inherent survivability of the planned U.S. Strategic force structure, particularly the OHIO-class ballistic missile submarines, a number of which are at sea at any given time." Implications These are BIG conclusions with BIG implications. They reaffirm conclusions made by DOD in 2010 ~http://www.foreign.senate.gov/publications/download/executive-report-111-06-treaty-with-russia-on-measures-for-further-reduction-and-limitation-of-strategic-offensive-arms-the-new-start-treaty~~, but the new report is important because it comes after Russia earlier this year announced plans to produce "over 400" nuclear missiles over the next decade. In the real world, however, Russian nuclear forces are not increasing. Even with Putin’s missile production plan, simultaneous retirement of older missile will continue the downward trend and result in a net reduction of Russian strategic nuclear forces over the next decade and a half. This fact has not stopped some from arguing against additional U.S. nuclear reductions. Their argument is that reductions are unwise at a time when Russia and others are modernizing their nuclear forces. Others have even argued that Russia could break out of the New START Treaty by cheating and presumably achieve some strategic advantage. Even the U.S. Senate’s advice and consent resolution that in 2010 approved the New START Treaty required that "the President should regulate reductions in United States strategic offensive arms so that the number of accountable strategic offensive arms under the New START Treaty possessed by the Russian Federation in no case exceeds the comparable number of accountable strategic offensive arms possessed by the United States to such an extent that a strategic imbalance endangers the national security interests of the United States" (emphasis added). A similar obsession with numbers was echoed in the 2012 report by the State Department’s International Strategic Advisory Board on future U.S.-Russian "Mutual Assured Stability," which concluded that it requires some "rough parity" of nuclear forces. (A similar number obsession has evolved with NATO about non-strategic nuclear weapons, but that’s another story). But the DOD report appears to conclude that such warnings and parity requirement are missing the point. Strategic stability and deterrence today are provided by a secure retaliatory capability, primarily ballistic missile submarines. In fact, although ICBMs and bombers also play a role in the U.S. nuclear posture, they seem oddly absent from the report’s description of what is required to maintain strategic stability based on a sufficient secure retaliatory capability. Retaining that capability, it seems, does not even require the ballistic missile submarines to be on alert (although the report doesn’t explicitly say so). It only requires that a sufficient number of submarines "are at sea" and secure at any given time – or perhaps even only in a crisis. Likewise, the conclusion that a Russian disarming first strike "will most likely not occur" may be obvious to most but, if formal, seems to remove the need for having ICBMs on alert, as long as a sufficient number of submarines are at sea to provide the basic deterrence that underpins strategic stability.
WOT Navy
Plan is key to naval operations- especially those necessary to win the war on terror
Schachte 4 (Rear Adm. William L. Schachte, USN, April 8, "¶ MILITARY IMPLICATIONS OF THE UNITED¶ NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF¶ THE SEA", http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CHRG-108shrg99782/html/CHRG-108shrg99782.htm) If we are going to successfully curtail this disturbing trend of ¶ creeping jurisdiction, AND diminishing resources more efficiently and ¶ effectively by concentrating on their primary missions.
2AC – LINK TURNS
Popularity
Loss on war powers bolsters Obama’s popularity- proves he is principled with no costs
Thompson, 13 — Forbes contributor ~Loren, "The Syria Vote: Why Obama Wins If He Loses," Forbes, 9-9-13, www.forbes.com/sites/lorenthompson/2013/09/09/the-syria-vote-why-obama-wins-if-he-loses/, accessed 2-8-13~
The Syria Vote: Why Obama Wins If He Loses Sometime this week, Congress will begin voting on a resolution that would support President AND faced in the Middle East understands how involvement there can wreck domestic agendas.
Principled loss even on unpopular issues is good politics- key to approval ratings
Davis, 11 — special counsel to President Clinton ~Lanny, formerly served under the Clinton and Bush W. administrations, Washington attorney specializing in legal crisis management, "Column: Obama, be a sharp-elbowed centrist," USA Today, 8-17-11, www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/forum/2011-08-17-obama-leadership-economy_n.htm, accessed 3-8-14~
Such bold and decisive moves by this president would be criticized as brash by some AND good politics for 2012. It would also be good for the nation.
Presidents are not as powerful as they are often imagined to be. Apart from AND is undoubtedly getting the honeymoon bounce now. He needs to hold that.
Senate action, and ratification are key- independently solves OCS development
Lugar, 10/4/07 (Richard, Senate Foreign Relations Expert, CQ Congressional Testimony) In absenting ourselves from the Law of the Sea Convention, we are risking making AND long term on issues of vital importance to our economy and national security.
Naval power prevents flash point escalation and global war – shipbuilding is key
NLUS, 12 – a nonprofit organization dedicated to educating our citizens about the importance of sea power to U.S. national security and supporting the men and women of the U.S. Navy, Marine Corps, Coast Guard and U.S.-flag Merchant Marine and their families (Navy League of the United States, "Maritime Primacy 26 Economic Prosperity: Maritime Policy 2012-13", Navy League of the United States, 1/21/12, http://www.navyleague.org/files/legislative_affairs/maritime_policy20122013.pdf | AK) Global engagement is critical to the U.S. economy, world trade and AND an effective fighting force. Taking care of our wounded warriors is fundamental.
Tuathail ’96 (Gearoid, Department of Georgraphy at Virginia Polytechnic Institute, Political Geography, 15(6-7), p. 664, science direct)
While theoretical debates at academic conferences are important to academics, the discourse and concerns AND needs to always be open to the patterned mess that is human history.
FOR the last 20 years we have lived amid the furious clangor of war — AND at least relative austerity, modesty and realism. Should we feel relieved?
The world is complex- pragmatic realism key- one-size models fail
Pillar ’13 (Paul R. Pillar, Paul R. Pillar is a contributing editor at The National Interest. He is also a nonresident senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and a nonresident senior fellow at Georgetown University’s Center for Security Studies, "The Age of Nationalism", September-October 2013)
THE URGE to apply era-defining labels to global affairs is strong and enduring AND the power that can be generated by nationalist sentiments within nation-states.
Rejecting security causes violent lashout
Weaver 2k (Ole, International relations theory and the politics of European integration, pages 284-285)
The other main possibility is to stress’ responsibility. Particularly in a field like security AND that could lead to security dilemmas and escalations, violence and mutual vilification.
We meet – plan changes the rules of combat for naval ops- that’s a restriction
Lobel 8 (Jules – Professor of Law, University of Pittsburgh Law School, "Conflicts Between the Commander in Chief and Congress: Concurrent Power over the Conduct of War", 2008, Ohio State Law Journal, 69 Ohio St. L.J. 391, lexis) More generally, the Court held that Congress has the power to authorize limited, AND short, it could dramatically restrict the President’s power to conduct the war.
C/I —- Restriction is limitation, NOT prohibition
CAC 12,COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ALTERNATIVE MEDICINAL CANNABIS COLLECTIVE et al., Defendants and Appellants, DIVISION ONE, 207 Cal. App. 4th 601; 143 Cal. Rptr. 3d 716; 2012 Cal. App. LEXIS 772 We disagree with County that in using the phrases "further restrict the location or AND and affordable distribution of marijuana to all patients in medical need of marijuana."
Counter-interpretation- Judicial interpretation of treaty authority is the same as interpreting statutory authority
Morrison, professor of law at Minnesota, 2010 (Fred L., The Protection of Foreign Investment In The United States of America+, 58 Am. J. Comp. L. 437, Lexis) Treaties, like federal law, are also part of the supreme law of the AND They have essentially the same authority in domestic law as formal treaties. n20 Some treaties and executive agreements are, however, non-self-executing and AND Supreme Court has found several international treaties not to be self-executing. ~NOTE: RELEVANT FOOTNOTES—~ n14. U.S. Const. art 2, § 2, cl. 2. n15. See, Restatement of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States (third) § 115 (1987) (An act of Congress supersedes an earlier rule of international law or a provision of an international agreement as law of the United States if the purpose of the act is to supersede the earlier rule or provision is clear or if the act and the earlier rule or provision cannot be fairly reconciled.). n16. According to the Supreme Court, a "self executing treaty" needs "no domestic legislation" to "give it force of law in the United States." Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Franklin Mint Corp., 466 U.S. 243, 252 (1984). Chief Justice Marshall asserted that a self-executing treaty "operates of itself, as : a rule for the Court," "equivalent to an act of the legislature." Foster v. Neilson, 27 U.S. 253, 314 (1829). n17. 1. U.S.C.A. § 112b (West 2009). n18. Dames 26 Moore v. Regan, 453 U.S. 654 (1981). n19. U.S. Const. art 2, § 2. n20. See, e.g., Dames 26 Moore v. Regan, 453 US 654 (1981); U.S. v. Pink, 313 U.S. 203 (1942). n21. Restatement of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States (third) § 111 ("Courts in the United States are bound to give effect to international law and to international agreements of the United States, except that a "non-self-executing" agreement will not be given effect as law in the absence of necessary implementation."). n22. Medellin v. Texas, 128 S.Ct. 1346 (2008) ("The interpretation of a treaty, like the interpretation of a statue, begins with its text."); (a treaty is "equivalent to an act of the legislature," and hence self-executing, when it "operates of itself without the aid of any legislative provision.") (Citing Foster v. Neilson, 27 U.S. 253, 254 (1829).). n23. Restatement (Third) of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States AND and state courts to give full faith and credit to judgments of A.").
Our aff IS the exception to your T argument – legislation means that it falls under the auspices of the WPR.
Niksch 94 (Larry A., Specialist in Asain Affairs, Foreign Affairs and National Defense Division, Congressional REsearch Service, "Congressional Research Service: Report for Congress, No 94-300, April 1, 1994) The question was raised at that time as to whether statutory¶ authorization was given AND to constitute specific statutory authorization¶ within the meaning of this joint resolution.
2NC kicked DA wrong- it had a proliferation and deterrence impact- more evidence on it causing extinction- not a new argument- and means turns the ptx
Taylor 6 ~Theodore B., Chairman of NOVA. July 6 2006, "Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons," http://wwwee.stanford.edu/~~hellman/Breakthrough/book/chapters/taylor.html~~ Nuclear proliferation - be it among nations or terrorists - greatly increases the chance of AND , the small nuclear war could easily escalate into a global nuclear war.
Constraints improve decision-making
Deborah NPearlstein 9, lecturer in public and international affairs, Woodrow Wilson School of Public 26 International Affairs, July 2009, "Form and Function in the National Security Constitution," Connecticut Law Review, 41 ConnLRev1549, lexis nexis It is in part for such reasons that studies of organizational performance in crisis management AND something more than arbitrary attention has been paid before transcendent priorities are overridden.
Galdorisi and Truver, ’05 (George, Director Space and Naval Warfare Center @ San Diego, Scott, National Security Programs @ Anteon Corp, Washington Times, 3/29) *gender modified The evolving U.S. strategic paradigm, dependent as it is on littoral AND role at the State Department, will add to an already burgeoning portfolio.
Congress key to credible posture and commitments
Waxman 13 (Matthew C- Professor of Law at Columbia Law School; Adjunct Senior Fellow for Law and Foreign Policy, Council on Foreign Relations, "The Constitutional Power to Threaten War", Forthcoming in Yale Law Journal, vol. 123 (2014), 8/25/2013, PDF) A second argument, this one advanced by some congressionalists, is that stronger legislative AND by pointing foreign actors to the appropriate institution or process for reading them.
US drone policy in Pakistan is violating Pakistan consent and setting an aggressive international precedent
Entous at. al ’12 (Adam Entous (National security correspondent for The Wall Street Journal), Siobhan Gorman (reporter for The Wall Street Journal covering terrorism, counter terrorism, and intelligence, which includes the activities of the sixteen intelligence agencies and the national security threats they aim to combat) and Evan Perez (reporter in the Washington bureau of The Wall Street Journal where he covers the Justice Department), "U.S. Unease Over Drone Strikes", http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10000872396390444100404577641520858011452-http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10000872396390444100404577641520858011452, September 26, 2012)
Obama Administration Charts Delicate Legal Path Defending Controversial Weapons About once a month, the AND be involved in detaining suspected militants in secret sites during the Bush administration.
Us legal silence is the issue- Pakistani sovereignty creates a global precedent for sovereignty violations
Drones may be new, futuristic weapons, but the U.S. drone AND it is time for U.S. officials to make the case.
Miscalc escalates gobally- China, Indo-Pak, and Iran escalate
Bergen and Rowland ’12 ~Peter Bergen, director of the National Security Studies Program at the New America Foundation, a research fellow at New York University’s Center on Law and Security and CNN’s national security analyst, former adjunct lecturer at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University and an Adjunct Professor at the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins University, CNN National Security analyst, and Jennifer Rowland, research associate at the New America Foundation, "A dangerous new world of drones," http://www.cnn.com/2012/10/01/opinion/bergen-world-of-drones/index.html-http://www.cnn.com/2012/10/01/opinion/bergen-world-of-drones/index.html~~
A decade ago, the United States had a virtual monopoly on drones. Not AND the future as much as tanks and bombers did during the 20th century.
Breaks down deterrence
Boyle ’13 ~Michael J. Boyle, PhD, is an Assistant Professor of Political Science at La Salle University in Philadelphia. He was previously a Lecturer in International Relations and Research Fellow at the Centre for the Study of Terrorism and Political Violence at the University of St. Andrews. He is also an alumnus of the Political Science Department at La Salle, research interests are on terrorism and political violence, with particular reference to the strategic use of violence in insurgencies and civil wars, "The costs and consequences of drone warfare," International Affairs 89: 1 (2013) 1–29, http://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/public/International20Affairs/2013/89_1/89_1Boyle.pdf-http://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/public/International Affairs/2013/89_1/89_1Boyle.pdf, 2013~
The emergence of this arms race for drones raises at least five long-term AND the legal and evidentiary difficulties associated with giving them a fair trial.147
Two scenarios
First- Armenian and Caucasus conflicts- draws in Israel/Iran/Russia
Armenia and Azerbaijan could soon be at war if drone proliferation on both sides of AND ~ will not be small. That’s the one thing I’m sure of."
Israel-Iran conflict escalates
Russell ’9 (James, Senior lecturer in the Department of National Security Affairs at NPS, Strategic Stability Reconsidered: Prospects for Escalation and Nuclear War in the Middle East. Proliferation Papers, 2009)
America’s disapproval of Israeli pre-emption may reflect a reduced national appetite for military AND centers by Hezbollah rockets in Southern Lebanon could also trigger an escalation spiral.
How China sparked a dangerous unmanned arms race. It’s now been a year since AND political leadership, these technologies could very well lead the region into war.
Taiwan is the most likely potential crisis that could trigger a nuclear war between China AND uncertain endeavor, could be especially difficult in any conflict," it says.
Independently- Executive uncertainty of US Drone policy cause accident and escalatory wars
While there are some justifiable points for the targeted killing program that individuals behind the AND haunt not only the executive, but the United States as a whole.
The CIA drone campaign in Pakistan has been stepped up under President Barack Obama without AND this war and may sooner rather than later rebound upon the US itself.
The Obama administration has proven itself to be acutely fond of executive orders designed to AND law binds it and how, and against whom it would be enforced?
Law is key to modeling- only statutory restrictions scale-up
ISLAMABAD — Just days after taking power, Pakistan’s new government summoned a top U AND party. Khan has been especially strident in campaigning against the drone strikes.
Obama has recently halted Pakistani drone strikes but it isn’t sufficient- still undermines Sharif
Goodman 2/6 (Ryan Goodman, co-editor-in-chief of Just Security. He is the Anne and Joel Ehrenkranz Professor of Law and Co-Chair of the Center for Human Rights and Global Justice at New York University School of Law, and he is also Professor of Politics and Professor of Sociology at NYU. He was the inaugural Rita E. Hauser Professor of Human Rights and Humanitarian Law and the Director of the Human Rights Program at Harvard Law School. He received a JD from Yale Law School, a Ph.D. from Yale University, and a B.A. from the University of Texas at Austin. He is a member of the Department of State’s Advisory Committee on International Law, a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, and member of the Board of Editors of the American Journal of International Law, "US to Reduce Drone Program in Pakistan – But Does Pakistan "Agree"? ", http://justsecurity.org/2014/02/06/reduce-drone-program-pakistan-pakistan-agree/-http://justsecurity.org/2014/02/06/reduce-drone-program-pakistan-pakistan-agree/, February 6, 2014)
A must-read story in the Wall Street Journal this morning details a " AND still apparently opposes the current drone program—even the tapering off approach.
And Sharif’s election means relations are in a position to skyrocket but drones are acting as a floodgate
ISLAMABAD - U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry and his Pakistani counterpart AND Zayed Al-Nahyan to discuss Egypt, Syria and Middle East peace.
Two scenarios- first energy
Sharif solves Pakistan economic collapse and trading blocs- key to solve multiple scenarios for escalatory great power war
Younus ’13 ~Uzair, international security studies analyst for the Fletcher Security Review, focusing on international trade in South West Asia, the Middle East, and North Africa, graduated summa cum laude from Bentley University, "PAKISTAN LOOKS TO NAWAZ SHARIF WITH HOPE," June 10, http://foreignpolicy.com.pk/pakistan-looks-to-nawaz-sharif-with-hope/~~
In his first speech as Prime Minister, Nawaz Sharif spoke with a seriousness rarely AND all but guarantee further militancy, instability, and increases in defence spending.
In an increasingly energy hungry world, Central Asia’s resources are attracting growing interest Having AND the catalyst that leads the region to slide back into more overt instability.
But a suicide bomber in Pakistan rammed a car packed with explosives into a jeep AND to be gravely serious about addressing the situation. So should we all.
India-Pakistan causes extinction
Starr ’11 (Consequences of a Single Failure of Nuclear Deterrence by Steven Starr February 07, 2011 * Associate member of the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation * Senior Scientist for PSR) Only a single failure of nuclear deterrence is required to start a nuclear war, AND the currently operational and deployed U.S. and Russian nuclear forces.
WHEN the relationship between Pakistan and United States turned sour after Salala incident in May AND challenges, while at the same time promote US interests in the region.
Afghanistan withdrawal key to prevent nuclear war
Cronin 13 (Audrey Kurth Cronin is Professor of Public Policy at George Mason University and author of How Terrorism Ends and Great Power Politics and the Struggle over Austria. Thinking Long on Afghanistan: Could it be Neutralized? Center for Strategic and International Studies The Washington Quarterly • 36:1 pp. 55_72 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2013.751650-http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2013.751650)
With ISAF withdrawal inevitable, a sea change is already underway: the question is AND except this time the outcome could be not just terrorism but nuclear war.
Failed withdrawal causes Russian war
Blank ’12 (Stephen Blank, Strategic Studies Institute, US Army War College- he studies this stuff, January 27, "Whither the new great game in Central Asia?", pdf) Although many scholars dislike the term "great game"¶ or "new great game AND great, regional, and local powers for influence in¶ Central Asia.¶
US- Russian war causes extinction
Barrett et al. 13 (Anthony M. Barrett- Global Catastrophic Risk Institute, Seth D. Baum- Center for Research on Environmental Decisions, Columbia University, Kelly R. Hostetler- Department of Geography, Pennsylvania State University, 2013, "Analyzing and Reducing the Risks of Inadvertent Nuclear War Between the United States and Russia", http://sethbaum.com/ac/fc_NuclearWar.pdf) War involving significant fractions of the U.S. and Russian nuclear arsenals, AND likely to misinterpret events as attacks. 60,61,62,63
Solvency
The United States Congress should restrict the president’s targeted killing authority by requiring that targeted killing operations be taken under agreed upon specified areas with the Pakistani Defense Committee of the Cabinet.
ISLAMABAD, Pakistan — President Obama’s commitment to scaling back the use of unmanned aircraft AND a role for the people in the countries where the drones are used."
Congress key —- self-restraint HURTS Obama’s credibility
Goldsmith ’13 (Jack Goldsmith, Henry L. Shattuck Professor at Harvard Law School, where he teaches and writes about national security law, presidential power, cybersecurity, international law, internet law, foreign relations law, and conflict of laws. Before coming to Harvard, Professor Goldsmith served as Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal Counsel from 2003-2004, and Special Counsel to the Department of Defense from 2002-2003, "How Obama Undermined the War on Terror The President promised not to undercut the rule of law for expedience’s sake. He did. Now we face the consequences", http://www.newrepublic.com/article/112964/obamas-secrecy-destroying-american-support-counterterrorism-http://www.newrepublic.com/article/112964/obamas-secrecy-destroying-american-support-counterterrorism, May 1, 2013)
Questions grew when the administration continued to withhold legal memos from Congress, and when AND for which he alone is today responsible, is increasingly viewed as illegitimate.
Obama strictly adheres to legal policy- status quo policy is firmly backed by legal grounding- their evidence doesn’t assume Congressional change
When the Obama administration made the decision to kill Awlaki, it did not rely AND inclination to do so, and it appears to support the current arrangement.
The U.S. wants to repair its relationship with Pakistan while carrying out AND So it’s not clear that a mutually beneficial balance could really be struck.
Cp
Self-restraint hurts credibility more
Goldsmith ’13 (Jack Goldsmith, Henry L. Shattuck Professor at Harvard Law School, where he teaches and writes about national security law, presidential power, cybersecurity, international law, internet law, foreign relations law, and conflict of laws. Before coming to Harvard, Professor Goldsmith served as Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal Counsel from 2003-2004, and Special Counsel to the Department of Defense from 2002-2003, "How Obama Undermined the War on Terror The President promised not to undercut the rule of law for expedience’s sake. He did. Now we face the consequences", http://www.newrepublic.com/article/112964/obamas-secrecy-destroying-american-support-counterterrorism-http://www.newrepublic.com/article/112964/obamas-secrecy-destroying-american-support-counterterrorism, May 1, 2013)
Questions grew when the administration continued to withhold legal memos from Congress, and when AND for which he alone is today responsible, is increasingly viewed as illegitimate.
Senate Joint Resolution A joint resolution, H.J. Res. or S.J. Res., is a legislative proposal that requires the approval of both Chambers and the signature of the President, just as a bill does, in order to have the force of law.
A2 arctic conflict
Military build-up does not mean conflict is likely —- Arctic countries still pursuing cooperation.
at least for the time being – that tensions will worsen as the region AND 17 new search-and-rescue aircraft in the next several years.
A2 Arctic enviro impact
The environment is resilient and indestructible
Easterbrook ’95 (Distinguished Fellow, Fullbright Foundation (Gregg, A Moment on Earth pg 25)
IN THE AFTERMATH OF EVENTS SUCH AS LOVE CANAL OR THE Exxon Valdez oil spill AND are pinpricks compared to forces of the magnitude nature is accustomed to resisting.
Independently, US targeted killing is driving a global shift in strategic doctrine toward preventive self-defense—-causes nuclear war
Kerstin Fisk 13, visiting assistant professor in the Department of Political Science at Loyola Marymount University, PhD in Political Science from Claremont Graduate University, and Jennifer M. Ramos, Assistant Professor of Political Science at Loyola Marymount University, PhD in Political Science from UC Davis, April 15 2013, "Actions Speak Louder Than Words: Preventive Self-Defense as a Cascading Norm," International Studies Perspectives, http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com.turing.library.northwestern.edu/doi/10.1111/insp.12013/full How and to what extent is the preventive use of force becoming the future of AND by discussing possibilities for further research and considering the implications of this phenomenon.
The impact is an endless, global series of preventive wars—-those go nuclear
Ariel Colonomos 13, Director of Research at the French National Centre for Scientific Research, Ph.D. in political science from the Institut d’Etudes Politiques de Paris, "The Gamble of War: Is it Possible to Justify Preventive War?" p 72-75, google books John Yoo holds that the American interventions in Afghanistan or Iraq fulfilled the criteria of AND United States to its new enemies and of their greater number and dispersal.
JAB
Specifically- this unable or unwilling doctrine collapses jus ad bellum firebreak and international precedent
ACLU et al. ’13 (American Civil Liberties Union Amnesty, International Center for Human Rights 26 Global Justice, NYU School of Law* Center for Civilians in Conflict Center for Constitutional Rights Global Justice Clinic, NYU School of Law* Human Rights First Human Rights Institute, Columbia Law School, Human Rights Watch, Open Society Foundations, "Joint Letter to President Obama on US Drone Strikes and Targeted Killings", April 11, 2013
Senior officials have claimed that the administration applies international humanitarian law to its targeted killing AND government’s ability to argue for constraints on lethal targeting operations of other states.
Doesn’t assume congress steps up when presidents violate oversight- empirically proven
Ettinger, 3-28 – former Ambassador, lecturer, insider on US-Israel relations ~Yoram, "Congressional muscle and US foreign policy," Israel Hayom, 3-28-14, www.israelhayom.com/site/newsletter_opinion.php?id=7879, accessed 3-28-14~
Contrary to conventional wisdom, the inherently pro-Israel Congress possesses the muscle to AND , expanding U.S.-Israel strategic cooperation, despite presidential opposition.
Obama strictly adheres to legal policy- status quo policy is firmly backed by legal grounding- their evidence doesn’t assume Congressional change
When the Obama administration made the decision to kill Awlaki, it did not rely AND inclination to do so, and it appears to support the current arrangement. 2AC- Tacit Consent
ISLAMABAD: Pakistani officials and former prime minister Yousuf Raza Gilani on Thursday denied a AND has been very clear regarding its policy on the issue," he said. 2AC- Middle Ground
With the first drone strike in Pakistan after its landmark elections, all eyes are AND named Sharif as one of the guarantors, though talks did not materialize.
Gregory Shaffer 11, Professor of Law, University of Minnesota Law School, and Mark Pollack, Professor of Political Science and Jean Monnet Chair, Temple University., Sept, ARTICLE: HARD VERSUS SOFT LAW IN INTERNATIONAL SECURITY, 52 B.C. L. Rev 1147 To effect specific policy goals, state and private actors increasingly turn to legal instruments AND are great but the potential for opportunism and its costs are high." n85
Unless Americans accept that we have by fiat devolved into a political system where the AND America is united and not acting merely at the discretion of one individual.
President Obama’s continued bombing of Pakistan, despite Islamabad’s repeated calls for the CIA to AND we had officially adopted as our own and cherished throughout the years.’
The risk and fear of Obama reneging on the CP means it doesn’t solve signal
The drone war is back. Amid fears that al Qaeda-affiliated terrorists in AND administration’s commitment to dialing back the war on terror are likely to persist.
On June 5, Pakistan’s National Assembly elected Nawaz Sharif as the country’s prime minister AND , would far outweigh the risks from continued stagflation and near-insolvency.
Backlash against Obama over emissions annoucnement
Roberta Rampton and Timothy Gardner (writers for Reuters) March 28, 2014 "Obama considers new climate regulations for oil, gas sector" http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/03/28/us-usa-climatechange-obama-idUSBREA2R10P20140328 The White House said on Friday it will take a hard look at whether new AND wells on public lands, one way to begin cutting emissions of methane.
2AC- Weak Now
Backlash now against Obama’s anti-terror policies
The Washington Post 3/27/14 (Jennifer Rubin, "Bipartisan Second-Thoughts on National Security") There are signs of a bipartisan pushback against the passive foreign policy and hostility to AND , and they’re not grateful to him for giving them what they want." 2AC – NSA
NSA reform triggers the link
Cohen, 3-25 — CNN ~Tom, Lisa Desjardins, and Jim Acosta, "Obama, Congress working on changes to NSA," CNN, 3-2-14, www.cnn.com/2014/03/25/politics/white-house-nsa/, accessed 3-26-14~
President Barack Obama and congressional leaders described similar proposals Tuesday for ending the National Security AND current system was legal, but needed changing to reassure a skeptical public.
2AC – Immigration
Obama immigration order triggers the link- thumps prez powers args
Gomez, 3-23 — USA Today ~Alan, "Obama ’humane’ order roils immigration debate," WTSP News, 3-23-14, www.wtsp.com/story/news/nation-now/2014/03/23/obama-humane-deportation-order-immigration-debate/6787289/, accessed 3-26-14~
Obama ’humane’ order roils immigration debate President Obama’s recent order to his administration to find ways to deport people living in AND through federal courts about the limits of presidential power that goes back decades.
2AC
Obama success inevitable- veto threat and security rhetoric
Rosenberg 2-7-14 ~M.J. Rosenberg is a Special Correspondent for The Washington Spectator, was most recently a Foreign Policy fellow at Media Matters For America, spent 15 years as a Senate and House aide, former editor of AIPAC’s newsletter Near East Report, "When Obama Made the Lobby Stand Down," http://www.washingtonspectator.org/index.php/Chuck-Schumer.html~~23.UzQ9bahdWMU~~
But it is less likely now, not after Obama issued his veto threat and AND that is the question, he wins. And so do us all.
Reid delays
McAuliff 2-26-14 ~Michael, was a Washington correspondent for the New York Daily News, where he covered Sen. Hillary Clinton, the 2008 presidential campaign, and the fight over the 9/11 health and compensation law, worked as a national and metro desk editor, he was the national editor of ABCNews.com, "Top Foreign Relations Republican Predicts Iran Sanctions Won’t Get A Vote," http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/02/26/bob-corker-iran-sanctions_n_4861429.html~~
The top Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee is admitting that the GOP push AND fashion, I think that’s probably helpful to the process," he said.
There’s literally momentum for more sanctions—-and those will independently ruin any negotiations
Benari 3/23 Elad Senators Urge Obama to Stand Firm Against Iran http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/178782~~23.UzXs9_ldWSo The 23 senators said they embraced Obama’s two-track approach twinning sanctions against Tehran AND his country, the nuclear deal reached in Geneva would be "dead".
Loss on war powers bolsters Obama’s popularity- proves he is principled with no costs
Thompson, 13 — Forbes contributor ~Loren, "The Syria Vote: Why Obama Wins If He Loses," Forbes, 9-9-13, www.forbes.com/sites/lorenthompson/2013/09/09/the-syria-vote-why-obama-wins-if-he-loses/, accessed 2-8-13~
The Syria Vote: Why Obama Wins If He Loses Sometime this week, Congress will begin voting on a resolution that would support President AND faced in the Middle East understands how involvement there can wreck domestic agendas.
JERUSALEM — Israeli intelligence estimates, backed by academic studies, have cast doubt on AND Qaddafi or Saddam Hussein if they had a nuclear capability? No way."
Substantive conditions aren’t the only way to limit how an authority can be used. Procedural constraints, such as requiring the affirmative approval of senior officials, can contribute to this end as well. We see this in the context of "covert action" under Title 50, for example, in the requirement of a presidential finding approving such actions.
C/I —- Restriction is limitation, NOT prohibition
CAC 12,COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ALTERNATIVE MEDICINAL CANNABIS COLLECTIVE et al., Defendants and Appellants, DIVISION ONE, 207 Cal. App. 4th 601; 143 Cal. Rptr. 3d 716; 2012 Cal. App. LEXIS 772 We disagree with County that in using the phrases "further restrict the location or AND and affordable distribution of marijuana to all patients in medical need of marijuana."
Silicon Valley’s investment wizards are fleeing the so-called green economy, and not AND Kleiner has enjoyed very few of them in its clean-tech portfolio.
IMF reform thumps rider
Wiesman, 3-25 – NY Times congressional reporter ~Jonathan, "Senate Democrats Drop I.M.F. Reforms From Ukraine Aid," NY Times, 3-25-14, www.nytimes.com/2014/03/26/world/europe/senate-democrats-drop-imf-reforms-from-ukraine-aid-package.html, accessed 3-26-14~
Democrats, bowing to united House Republican opposition, dropped reforms of International Monetary Fund AND the Republican leader. "I agree with these two important House Democrats.
Indeed, these days the United States absolves itself of any responsibility to finish wars AND creating new problems, this alternative approach just might solve some old ones.
No accidental launch
Williscroft ’10 (Six patrols on the John Marshall as a Sonar Technician, and four on the Von Steuben as an officer – a total of twenty-two submerged months. Navigator and Ops Officer on Ortolan 26 Pigeon – Submarine Rescue 26 Saturation Diving ships. Watch and Diving Officer on Oceanographer and Surveyor. "Accidental Nuclear War" http://www.argee.net/Thrawn20Rickle/Thrawn20Rickle2032.htm, 2010)
Is there a realistic chance that we could have a nuclear war by accident? AND missile can be accidentally launched...ever...under any circumstances...period21
3/30/14
NSA Affirmative- 1AC Dartmouth
Tournament: Dartmouth RR | Round: 2 | Opponent: Mary Washington | Judge: NSA 1AC (vs Mary Wash) Plan Text US Congress should prohibit National Security Agency offensive cyber operations not authorized by a congressionally elected civilian head.
NSA overreach causes cyber attacks and backlash- Alexander is stepping down now and thus removing joint-command solves Wheeler ’13 (PhD from Michigan, specialized in researching on politics, Writer for the Guardian, specializing in national security and civil liberties. She has written for blogs The Next Hurrah and Firedoglake, “After General Alexander, Obama should split the NSA to make us all safer”, http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/oct/21/general-alexander-obama-split-nsa, October 21, 2013)
The NSA's aggressive pursuit of Big Data has not only invaded our privacy, but AND formidable adversaries in the effort to keep the US safe from cyber attacks.
(Reuters) - The White House is nearing a decision on splitting up the AND the position would be split, we are not yet considering preferred candidates."
Advantage 1: NSA Overreach Cyber war causes nuclear lashout Fritz ‘9 (Jason - former Captain of the U.S. Army, July, Hacking Nuclear Command and Control)
The US uses the two-man rule to achieve a higher level of security AND of mass DDoS attacks, real world protests, and accusations between governments. Escalates to global war Lawson ‘9 (Sean, Assistant professor in the Department of Communication at the University of Utah, Cross-Domain Response to Cyber Attacks and the Threat of Conflict, p. http://www.seanlawson.net/?p=477, June 13, 2009)
At a time when it seems impossible to avoid the seemingly growing hysteria over the AND lethal agent is regarded with the same or greater seriousness.” 7 Cyberwarfare draws in space war Coleman ‘10 (Kevin Coleman, Defense Tech Chief Cyber War Correspondent, Cyber War = Space War, http://defensetech.org/2010/03/01/cyber-war-space-war/#ixzz1948Fvj1r, March 1, 2010)
While the satellite broadband market slowed in 2009 because of the poor economy, it AND and are integrated with and dependent on communication satellite systems in outer space.
Space war causes extinction Mitchell et al ‘1 (Dr. Gordon, Associate Professor of Communication and Director of Debate at the University of Pittsburgh, ISIS Briefing on Ballistic Missile Defence, “Missile Defence: Trans-Atlantic Diplomacy at a Crossroads”, No. 6 July, http://www.isisuk.demon.co.uk/0811/isis/uk/bmd/no6.html, July 2001)
The dizzying speed of space warfare would introduce intense ‘use or lose’ pressure into AND space could plunge the world into the most destructive military conflict ever seen. A cyber attack has the same fallout as a nuclear weapon- economic and military ruin Greenemeier ‘7 (Larry Greenemeier and Sharon Gaudin, “The Impact Of Cyberwarfare”, http://www.informationweek.com/the-impact-of-cyberwarfare/199800131, June 2, 2007)
It's a chilling prospect, too potentially devastating to ignore. Cyberwarfare: What will AND Teams in other countries, including Finland and Germany, according to ENISA. NSA overreach will trigger these wars through Tailored Access Operations Nakashima ’13 (Ellen Nakashima, national security reporter for The Washington Post. She focuses on issues relating to intelligence, technology and civil liberties. She previously served as a Southeast Asia correspondent for the paper. She wrote about the presidential candidacy of Al Gore and co-authored a biography of Gore, and has also covered federal agencies, Virginia state politics and local affairs. She joined the Post in 1995. “Dual-leadership role at NSA and Cyber Command stirs debate”, http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/dual-leadership-role-at-nsa-a
Tournament: Dartmouth RR | Round: 4 | Opponent: Northwestern | Judge: The United States Congress should restrict the president’s targeted killing authority by requiring that targeted killing operations be taken under agreed upon specified areas with the Pakistani Defense Committee of the Cabinet.
Advantage {X}: US Aggression US drone policy in Pakistan is violating Pakistan consent and setting an aggressive international precedent Entous at. al ’12 (Adam Entous (National security correspondent for The Wall Street Journal), Siobhan Gorman (reporter for The Wall Street Journal covering terrorism, counter terrorism, and intelligence, which includes the activities of the sixteen intelligence agencies and the national security threats they aim to combat) and Evan Perez (reporter in the Washington bureau of The Wall Street Journal where he covers the Justice Department), “U.S. Unease Over Drone Strikes”, http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10000872396390444100404577641520858011452, September 26, 2012)
Obama Administration Charts Delicate Legal Path Defending Controversial Weapons About once a month, the AND be involved in detaining suspected militants in secret sites during the Bush administration. Miscalc escalates gobally- China, Indo-Pak, and Iran escalate Bergen and Rowland ’12 Peter Bergen, director of the National Security Studies Program at the New America Foundation, a research fellow at New York University's Center on Law and Security and CNN's national security analyst, former adjunct lecturer at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University and an Adjunct Professor at the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins University, CNN National Security analyst, and Jennifer Rowland, research associate at the New America Foundation, “A dangerous new world of drones,” http://www.cnn.com/2012/10/01/opinion/bergen-world-of-drones/index.html
A decade ago, the United States had a virtual monopoly on drones. Not AND the future as much as tanks and bombers did during the 20th century. Independently- Executive uncertainty of US Drone policy cause accident and escalatory wars Dean ‘13 Adriana, degree from the University of Southern California in Philosophy, Politics and Law, Chapter Officer of Young Americans for Liberty, an organization with over 125,000 members nationwide, “Targeted Killings Behind the Veil of Ignorance,” http://www.academia.edu/3832442/Targeted_Killings_Behind_the_Veil_of_Ignorance
While there are some justifiable points for the targeted killing program that individuals behind the AND haunt not only the executive, but the United States as a whole. Acceding to self-determination claims is an ethical stance that does not endorse Western domination Bergoffen ‘8 (Debra Bergoffen, Professor of Philosophy and a member of the Women's Studies and Cultural Studies programs at George Mason University, Spring 2008, The Just War Tradition: Translating the Ethics of Human Dignity into Political Practices, Hypatia Volume 23, Number 2)
In its beginnings, these strictures were vulnerable to being co-opted by the AND shared point of departure that makes both their differences and their commonality possible.
ISLAMABAD: Advisor to Prime Minister on National Security and Foreign Affairs Sartaj Aziz Wednesday AND the people living in tribal areas had to ensured to impr
2/2/14
Shaw Affirmative 1AC
Tournament: Georgia State University | Round: 5 | Opponent: Harvard BS | Judge: Austin Woodruff Hostile environments and profiling IS the status quo ---- the American “Predator Empire” operates under the framework of presumptive guilt, refusing to delineate the distinction between livelihoods of individuals and their “personalities” --- this exemplifies an unaccountable politics of purity that can cast its power, both inclusion and exclusion, to communities abroad and at home Shaw 2013 (Ian G. R. Shaw, Professor of Human Geography at the University of Glasgow, “Predator Empire: The Geopolitics of US Drone Warfare”, Geopolitics, DOI:10.1080/14650045.2012, 2013)
The Double Tap The debate over whether or not drone strikes are a “success” is usually AND Their vulnerability is inseparable from the topological spatial power of the Predator Empire.
Lee and I take a position that there should be restrictions on the United States committing targeted killings ? There is always a necessity to work on the self --- and that method is anti-thetical to patting oneself on their back, and in the context of the topic the affirmative is necessary to bring to discussion debates that happen in closed doors and is “a noise that few listen to” ---- our affirmative is a form of informing an increasingly disconnected public about the spread of drones to law enforcement Shaw 2013 (Ian G. R. Shaw, Professor of Human Geography at the University of Glasgow, “Predator Empire: The Geopolitics of US Drone Warfare”, Geopolitics, DOI:10.1080/14650045.2012, 2013)
Conclusions By introducing the term Predator Empire I do not want to suggest that U. AND security away from this entrenched logic of “death-as-success".
The devils are in the details --- understanding details about policy is critical for us to better debate about the implications of unaccountable profiling and introduction of violence --- it can help us create a community of acknowledgement which is key Hughes 2012 (Evin, Georgia Southern Univ. Float Like a Plane, Sting Like a Bomb: The Ethics of US Drone Attacks www.ncte.org/library/NCTEFiles/About/Awards/.../Hughes_Evin.pdf. edited for gendered/able-ist language)
What Ali was able to do through his nonviolent rhetoric that is still relevant to AND to be “locked into violences we cannot escape” (Amy 69).
The refusal to deliberate over drone policy risks public apathy because of the invisible nature of drone warfare ---- the affirmative brings an opportunity to re-engage the public to challenge presidential action Druck 2012 Judah A. Druck, law associate at Sullivan and Cromwell LLP, Cornell Law School graduate, magna cum laude graduate from Brandeis University, “Droning On: The War Powers Resolution and the Numbing Effect of Technology-Driven Warfare,” http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Druck-final.pdf
The practical effects of this move toward a technology-driven, and¶ therefore AND conducive¶ to the formation of a substantial check on presidential action.134
Engaging in the political sciences to create solutions for drones helps us learn about the details and clarifies the solutions necessary Omar Bashir writes on “How to Improve the Drones Debate” in 2012 (Omar, Princeton PhD candidate. How to Improve the Drones Debate http://themonkeycage.org/2012/11/15/how-to-improve-the-drones-debate/)
Most news articles about drones cover some new development, claim to raise new ethical AND them in the comments, and feel free to post your own ideas.
What complicates those hundreds of civilian deaths is the official silence that surrounds them. AND learn about drones, the more we should know about who they kill.
9/22/13
Signature Strikes 1AC
Tournament: Georgia State University | Round: 2 | Opponent: Liberty BoMu | Judge: Carly 1AC
P Aff – Pakistan Advantage 1/
Drone strikes are causing instability and terrorist backlash in Pakistan - creating a failed state syndrome and killing relations
Rohde ’12 (David Rohde, American author and investigative journalist for Thomson Reuters. While a reporter for The Christian Science Monitor, he won the Pulitzer Prize for International Reporting in 1996 for his coverage of the Srebrenica massacre. From July 2002 until December 2004, he was co-chief of The New York Timesand#39; South Asia bureau, based in New Delhi, India. He shared a second Pulitzer Prize for Times 2008 team coverage of Afghanistan and Pakistan, While in Afghanistan, Rohde was kidnapped by members of the Taliban in November 2008, but managed to escape in June 2009 after seven months in captivity, “How Obama’s drone war is backfiring”, http://blogs.reuters.com/david-rohde/2012/03/01/how-obamas-drone-war-is-backfiring/, March/April issue of Foreign Policy, March 1, 2012)
When Barack Obama took the oath of office three years ago, no one associated AND he asked me. “I don’t think we’ve answered that question yet.”
Pakistan collapse causes global nuclear war Pitt ‘9 (William, a New York Times and internationally bestselling author of two books: and#34;War on Iraq: What Team Bush Doesnand#39;t Want You to Knowand#34; and and#34;The Greatest Sedition Is Silence.and#34;, “Unstable Pakistan Threatens the World,” http://www.arabamericannews.com/news/index.php?mod=articleandcat=commentaryandarticle=2183, May 8, 2009)
But a suicide bomber in Pakistan rammed a car packed with explosives into a jeep AND to be gravely serious about addressing the situation. So should we all.
And Pakistan nukes are not secure Gregory ’11 (Shaun, Director of the Pakistan Security Research Unit at the University of Bradford, UK, a professor who published widely on nuclear and security issues in Pakistan and advises many governments, their agencies, and international organizations, “Terrorist Tactics in Pakistan Threaten Nuclear Weapons Safety,” CTC Sentinel, Vol. 4.6, http://kms1.isn.ethz.ch/serviceengine/Files/ISN/131002/ichaptersection_singledocument/aa282522-4971-4513-a7ca-ec3afcd259be/en/Art+2.pdf, accessed 10-26-11, June 2011)
Two high-profile attacks by terrorists on highly secure military bases in Pakistan, AND odds that Pakistan’s nuclear weapons security will eventually be compromised continue to rise.
And it causes Indo-Pak escalation Clarke 4-17-13 Michael, PhD, Senior Research Fellow at Griffith Asia Institute with a special focus in terrorism, Griffith University, Bachelor of Arts (Honors) in Asian and International Studies, “Pakistan and Nuclear Terrorism: How Real is the Threat?” Comparative Strategy, 32:2, 98-114, online
A delegative system has been construed as holding the potential to open the door for AND scale internal subversion of Pakistan to destabilize¶ it (domestic threshold).48
Indo-Pak war causes global nuclear winter- MAD breaks down Hundley ’12 Tom, senior editor at the Pulitzer Center, MA in international relations from the University of Pennsylvania, former National Endowment for the Humanities journalism fellow at the University of Michigan, was a newspaper journalist for 36 years, including nearly two decades as a foreign correspondent for the Chicago Tribune, “Pakistan and India: Race to the End,” 9-5-12, http://pulitzercenter.org/reporting/pakistan-nuclear-weapons-battlefield-india-arms-race-energy-cold-war
Pakistan, however, seems to have embraced this discarded strategy and is now, AND it, but neither seems able to slow their dangerous race to annihilation.
The plan is key to effective drone usage- 1) Host Country- Ending drones key to host country cooperation Streeter ’13 (Devin C. Streeter, Helms School Of Government, Liberty University “Boko Haram, Drone Policy, And Port Security: Issues For Congress”, http://www.academia.edu/3523639/U.S._Drone_Policy_Tactical_Success_and_Strategic_Failure, April 19, 2013)
A new set of drone operating procedures would help to repair international relations and decrease AND agenda, for the purpose of improving foreign policy and repairing international relations.
Working with Regional and Host Country Partners The third lesson is that in most cases AND , as will support to regional security structures like the Gulf Cooperation Council.
2) Targeted strikes key to effective strikes Dunn and Wolf ’13 Dr David Hastings Dunn is Reader in International Politics and Head of ¶ Department in the Department of Political Science and International Studies ¶ at the University of Birmingham, UK, Chairman of the ¶ West Midlands Military Education Committee, winner of the the UK’s Political Studies Association’s ¶ Best Article in the British Journal of Politics and International Relations in ¶ 2009 Prize, and Stefan Wolff, PhD, is Professor of International Security at the University of ¶ Birmingham in the UK, “Drone Use in Counter-Insurgency and CounterTerrorism: Policy or Policy Component?” http://www.rusi.org/downloads/assets/WHR_2-13_Hitting_the_Target.pdf#page=89
The use of drones as weapons has evolved naturally from their use as reconnaissance vehicles AND begin a process of taking drones out of the hands of the CIA.
Republican Congressman Ronald Earnest Paul`s query to the House regarding the legitimacy of AND continue to suffer heavy casualties in the battles underway on our western borders.
As President Obama’s second term gets underway, his administration must engage with Pakistan on AND .S. government, this narrative can easily be exploited and promoted.
P Aff – Allied Backlash Advantage 1/ Backlash to drone strikes is undermining international credibility and makes drone strikes ineffective Zenko ’13 (Micah Zenko, Douglas Dillon fellow in the Center for Preventive Action (CPA) at the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Previously, he worked for five years at the Harvard Kennedy School and in Washington, DC, at the Brookings Institution, Congressional Research Service, and State Department’s Office of Policy Planning, “Reforming U.S. Drone Strike Policies,” January, Council Special Report No. 65, Online, 2013)
In his Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech, President Obama declared: “Where force AND more likely to use lethal force against the United States and its allies.
Drone usage causes specifically allied backlash that undermines hegemony Streeter ‘13 (Devin C, Director of Activities, Public Relations, and Recruitment at Liberty University Strategic Intelligence Society, “US Drone Policy: Tactical Success and Strategic Failure,” http://www.academia.edu/3523639/U.S._Drone_Policy_Tactical_Success_and_Strategic_Failure, April 19, 2013)
The first category of nations, while not targeted by drone strikes, is intimidated AND Europe are to be fixed, a change in drone protocol is needed.
Credibility is the vital internal link into all foreign policy objectives- military capability is irrelevant to hegemony CSIS ’11 (Center for Studies in International Security, Joint-Research Project, Jon B. Alterman, Ernest Z. Bower, Victor D. Cha, Heather A. Conley, Stephen J. Flanagan, Bonnie S. Glaser, Michael J. Green, Andrew C. Kuchins, Haim Malka, Teresita C. Schaffer, Craig S. Cohen, “Foreign Assessments of U.S. Power Capacity and Resolve”, June 2011)
This study looks at foreign assessments of U.S. power over the next AND key countries and their views and expectations of U.S. power.
Alliance backlash undermines an effective US hegemonic strategy which prevents global instability Brooks, Ikenberry and Wohlforth ’13 (Stephen Brooks, Associate Professor of Government at Dartmouth College, John Ikenberry, Albert G. Milbank Professor of Politics and International Affairs at Princeton University and Global Eminence Scholar at Kyung Hee University in Seoul, John Wohlforth, Daniel Webster Professor of Government at Dartmouth College, Foreign Affairs, Lean Forward, EBSCO, Jan/Feb 2013)
Of course, even if it is true that the costs of deep engagement fall AND an engaged and liberal leading power. The results could well be disastrous.
Legitimacy is key to an effective international order Finnemore ‘9 (Martha Finnemore 9, professor of political science and international affairs at George Washington University, “Legitimacy, Hypocrisy, and the Social Structure of Unipolarity: Why Being a Unipole Isn’t All It’s Cracked Up to Be,” World Politics, Volume 61, Number 1, 2009)
Legitimacy is, by its nature, a social and relational phenomenon. One’s position AND an expensive system to run and few unipoles have tried to do so.
An unmanned U.S. aerial vehicle — or drone — reportedly killed eight AND will demonstrate to the world that we believe in the rule of law.
P Aff – Plan Text Text: The United States Congress should restrict the use of signature strikes by the President of the United States.
P Aff – Solvency 1/ Plan solves credibility and U.S. drone effectiveness Zenko ’13 Micah, Douglas Dillon fellow in the Center for Preventive Action (CPA) at the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). Previously, he worked for five years at the Harvard Kennedy School and in Washington, DC, at the Brookings Institution, Congressional Research Service, and State Department’s Office of Policy Planning, “Reforming U.S. Drone Strike Policies,” January, Council Special Report No. 65, online
In his Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech, President Obama declared:¶ “Where force AND likely to use lethal force against the United States¶ and its allies.
All relevant officials will comply with the plan Goldsmith ’12 Jack Goldsmith is a Harvard Law professor and a member of the Hoover Task Force on National Security and Law. He served in the Bush administration as assistant attorney general in charge of the Office of Legal Counsel, “Fire When Ready,” 3-19-12, http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2012/03/19/fire_when_ready?page=full, March 19, 2012
When the Obama administration made the decision to kill Awlaki, it did not rely AND inclination to do so, and it appears to support the current arrangement.
9/21/13
Signature Strikes Yemen 1AC
Tournament: Georgia State University | Round: 7 | Opponent: Northwestern MV | Judge: David Heidt Yemen 1/
Yemen has become the new epicenter of drone warfare- drone are causing backlash and there is no fear factor Ackerman from August (Spencer Ackerman, “Barrage of drone strikes in Yemen show flaws of US counter-terrorism strategy”, http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/aug/12/yemen-drone-strikes-us-policy, August 12, 2013)
If the barrage of US drone strikes over the last week weakened al-Qaida's AND recent actions, the US has become al-Qaida's public relations officer."
When Barack Obama took the oath of office three years ago, no one associated AND he asked me. “I don’t think we’ve answered that question yet.” ? The plan solves 1) Host Country- Ending drones key to host country cooperation Streeter ’13 (Devin C. Streeter, Helms School Of Government, Liberty University “Boko Haram, Drone Policy, And Port Security: Issues For Congress”, http://www.academia.edu/3523639/U.S._Drone_Policy_Tactical_Success_and_Strategic_Failure, April 19, 2013)
A new set of drone operating procedures would help to repair international relations and decrease AND agenda, for the purpose of improving foreign policy and repairing international relations.
Working with Regional and Host Country Partners The third lesson is that in most cases AND , as will support to regional security structures like the Gulf Cooperation Council.
? 2) Limiting strikes key to effectiveness AND the plan increases the local people’s credibility Johnsen ‘13 (Gregory D. Johnsen, former Fulbright Fellow in Yemen, Ph.D. candidate in Near Eastern Studies at Princeton University, co-founder of Waq al-Waq: Islam and Insurgency in Yemen Blog, was a member of the USAID's conflict assessment team for Yemen, “How to Beat Al-Qaeda in Yemen,” http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-08-15/how-to-beat-al-qaeda-in-yemen.html, August 15, 2013)
Drone strikes can be an effective weapon. And the administration’s reluctance to put boots AND Qaeda, with the U.S. allying with its Yemeni partners. ? 3) Increases Yemeni government --- they want us to pull back Shiban ‘13 (Baraa Shiban is a member of the Yemeni National Dialogue Conference and Reprieve's project coordinator in Yemen, “Drone strikes in Yemen are an obstacle to democracy,” http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2013/09/2013918595250580.html, September 2, 2013)
One year ago last week, two Yemeni civilians were killed by a US drone AND and Yemen respect this fact, they will find their goals rejected too.
4) Signature strikes collapse counter-terror in Yemen – civilian casualties cause blowback, devastates cred, and jacks host-state legitimacy Greenfield 8/19 - deputy director of the Rafik Hariri Center for the Middle East at the Atlantic Council, where she leads the Yemen Policy Group. Danya. “The Case Against Drone Strikes on People Who Only 'Act' Like Terrorists” August 19, 2013. http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2013/08/the-case-against-drone-strikes-on-people-who-only-act-like-terrorists/278744/ As Mark Bowden discusses in this month's Atlantic cover story, there is great debate AND that strengthens the very groups the U.S. seeks to destroy. ? 5) Hadi legitimacy Al-Muslimi ’13 (Farea Al-Muslimi, “Statement of Farea Al-Muslimi”, United States Senate Judiciary Committee, Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Human Rights, “Drone Wars: The Constitutional and Counterterrorism Implications of Targeted Killing”, April 23, 2013)
Widespread Impact of Targeted Killing in Yemen The killing of innocent civilians by U. AND or Nader Al-Shadadi, only to be proven wrong days later. ? AQAP will attack India Roychowdhury ‘11 (Gen. Shankar Roychowdhury is a former Chief of Army Staff and a former member of Parliament, “India needs a 360° terror appraisal”, Deccan Chronicle, http://www.deccanchronicle.com/editorial/dc-comment/india-needs-360C2B0-terror-appraisal-659, September 6, 2011)
In this context, Al Qaeda and its emerging connections in Yemen have become very AND take due note of other threats as well and exercise the requisite caution.
In 1914, a terrorist assassinated Archduke Franz Ferdinand in Sarajevo - unleashing geopolitical forces AND for broader geopolitical crises may be the greatest threat we face from terrorism. ? Instability spills over to the entire Horn of Africa Ginny Hill, “Yemen: Fear of Failure; Middle East and North Africa Programme”, Chatham House, January 2010, http://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/22924953ECE8BBF1492576EA000E8E41-Full_Report.pdf
Future instability in Yemen could expand a lawless zone stretching from northern Kenya, through AND endanger the security of countries throughout the Arabian Peninsula and the Horn of Africa
Causes major power wars Glick ‘7 (Dec. 10, 2007 Caroline Glick , THE JERUSALEM POST)
The Horn of Africa is a dangerous and strategically vital place. Small wars, AND Chinese-run oil installation in April killing nine Chinese and 65 Ethiopians.
Towards the end of July, the leader of AQAP, Nasir al Wuhayshi, AND world) with Al Shabaab’s reach can make for a particularly challenging situation. ? The impact is global nuclear war Panzner ‘8 (Michael, faculty at the New York Institute of Finance, 25-year veteran of the global stock, bond, and currency markets who has worked in New York and London for HSBC, Soros Funds, ABN Amro, Dresdner Bank, and JPMorgan Chase, “Financial Armageddon: Protect Your Future from Economic Collapse”, Revised and Updated Edition, p. 136-138, googlebooks)
Continuing calls for curbs on the flow of finance and trade will inspire the United AND between Muslims and Western societies as the beginnings of a new world war.
Allied Backlash 1/
Backlash to drone strikes is undermining international credibility and makes drone strikes ineffective Zenko ’13 (Micah Zenko, Douglas Dillon fellow in the Center for Preventive Action (CPA) at the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Previously, he worked for five years at the Harvard Kennedy School and in Washington, DC, at the Brookings Institution, Congressional Research Service, and State Department’s Office of Policy Planning, “Reforming U.S. Drone Strike Policies,” January, Council Special Report No. 65, Online, 2013)
In his Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech, President Obama declared: “Where force AND more likely to use lethal force against the United States and its allies. ? Drone usage causes international backlash that undermines hegemony and allies turning to China- specifically ends EU cooperation Streeter ‘13 (Devin C, Director of Activities, Public Relations, and Recruitment at Liberty University Strategic Intelligence Society, “US Drone Policy: Tactical Success and Strategic Failure,” http://www.academia.edu/3523639/U.S._Drone_Policy_Tactical_Success_and_Strategic_Failure, April 19, 2013)
The first category of nations, while not targeted by drone strikes, is intimidated AND Europe are to be fixed, a change in drone protocol is needed.
First is Europe- US-EU relations are key to hegemony Gordon ‘3 (Philip H. Gordon, Senior Fellow in Foreign Policy Studies and Director of the Center on the United States and France at the Brookings Institution, Foreign Affairs, January/February 2003)
Some, of course, would argue that it does not matter whether the Germanys AND lend political support, and out to counter American interests at every turn.
US-EU relations prevent Eurasian global nuclear war Brzezinski ‘3 (Zbigniew Brzezinski, former national security advisor to the president, “Hegemonic quicksand,” National Interest Winter, 2003)
FOR THE next several decades, the most volatile and dangerous region of the world AND as a returning colonialist bent on consolidating or regaining its special economic interests.
Relations key to solve the environment Vig and Faure ‘4 (Norman J. Vig and Michael G. Faure, professor of science, technology and society at Carleton College, Minnesota and professor of comparative and international environmental law at Maastricht U, the Netherlands, Green Giants? Environmental Policies of the United States and the European Union, 2004)
This book stems from our concern that the US and the EU—representing the AND will be willing or able to pursue sustainable development policies in the future. Ecosystem collapse risks extinction Coyne and Hoekstra ‘7 (Jerry and Hopi, *professor in the Department of Ecology and Evolution at the University of Chicago AND Associate Professor in the Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology at Harvard University, New Republic, “The Greatest Dying,” 9/24, http://www.truthout.org/article/jerry-coyne-and-hopi-e-hoekstra-the-greatest-dying, September 24, 2007)
But it isn't just the destruction of the rainforests that should trouble us. Healthy AND just another Great Dying, but perhaps the greatest dying of them all. ? Now leadership- Credibility is the vital internal link into all foreign policy objectives- military capability is irrelevant to hegemony CSIS ’11 (Center for Studies in International Security, Joint-Research Project, Jon B. Alterman, Ernest Z. Bower, Victor D. Cha, Heather A. Conley, Stephen J. Flanagan, Bonnie S. Glaser, Michael J. Green, Andrew C. Kuchins, Haim Malka, Teresita C. Schaffer, Craig S. Cohen, “Foreign Assessments of U.S. Power Capacity and Resolve”, June 2011)
This study looks at foreign assessments of U.S. power over the next AND key countries and their views and expectations of U.S. power.
Alliance backlash undermines an effective US hegemonic strategy which prevents global instability Brooks, Ikenberry and Wohlforth ’13 (Stephen Brooks, Associate Professor of Government at Dartmouth College, John Ikenberry, Albert G. Milbank Professor of Politics and International Affairs at Princeton University and Global Eminence Scholar at Kyung Hee University in Seoul, John Wohlforth, Daniel Webster Professor of Government at Dartmouth College, Foreign Affairs, Lean Forward, EBSCO, Jan/Feb 2013)
Of course, even if it is true that the costs of deep engagement fall AND inclined to support the existing system is because they value their military alliances. Japan, to name one example, has shown interest in the Trans-Pacific AND an engaged and liberal leading power. The results could well be disastrous.
Legitimacy is key to an effective international order Finnemore ‘9 (Martha Finnemore 9, professor of political science and international affairs at George Washington University, “Legitimacy, Hypocrisy, and the Social Structure of Unipolarity: Why Being a Unipole Isn’t All It’s Cracked Up to Be,” World Politics, Volume 61, Number 1, 2009)
Legitimacy is, by its nature, a social and relational phenomenon. One’s position AND an expensive system to run and few unipoles have tried to do so.
An unmanned U.S. aerial vehicle — or drone — reportedly killed eight AND will demonstrate to the world that we believe in the rule of law.
Plan Text: The United States Congress should restrict the use of signature strikes by the President of the United States in Yemen.
Solvency 1/
Plan solves credibility and U.S. drone effectiveness Zenko ’13 Micah, Douglas Dillon fellow in the Center for Preventive Action (CPA) at the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). Previously, he worked for five years at the Harvard Kennedy School and in Washington, DC, at the Brookings Institution, Congressional Research Service, and State Department’s Office of Policy Planning, “Reforming U.S. Drone Strike Policies,” January, Council Special Report No. 65, online
In his Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech, President Obama declared:¶ “Where force AND likely to use lethal force against the United States¶ and its allies.
All relevant officials will comply with the plan Goldsmith ’12 Jack Goldsmith is a Harvard Law professor and a member of the Hoover Task Force on National Security and Law. He served in the Bush administration as assistant attorney general in charge of the Office of Legal Counsel, “Fire When Ready,” 3-19-12, http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2012/03/19/fire_when_ready?page=full, March 19, 2012
When the Obama administration made the decision to kill Awlaki, it did not rely AND inclination to do so, and it appears to support the current arrangement.