Tournament: Kentucky | Round: 1 | Opponent: Louisville BP | Judge: Joe Koehle
In order to promote this equitable discussion within debates, affirmative teams must defend an advocacy in that defends topical actions-
First is definitional support
The word “resolved” before the colon means the plan must be enacted in a legislative forum, that’s a quote from the Army Officer School 04.
(5-12, “# 12, Punctuation – The Colon and Semicolon”, http://usawocc.army.mil/IMI/wg12.htm)
The colon introduces the following: a. A list, but only after "
AND
"resolved:"Resolved: (colon) That this council petition the mayor
Should indicates obligation or duty
Compact Oxford English Dictionary, 8 (“should”, 2008, http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/should?view=uk)
Should
And
modal verb (3rd sing. should) 1 used to indicate obligation, duty, or correctness. 2 used to indicate what is probable. 3 formal expressing the conditional mood. 4 used in a clause with ‘that’ after a main clause describing feelings. 5 used in a clause with ‘that’ expressing purpose. 6 (in the first person) expressing a polite request or acceptance. 7 (in the first person) expressing a conjecture or hope.
USAGE Strictly speaking should is used with I and we, as in I should
AND
, through the use of the contracted forms I’d, we’d, etc.
War Powers are the “Power to wage war successfully”
SCOTUS 1948 (LICHTER ET AL., DOING BUSINESS AS SOUTHERN FIREPROOFING CO., v
AND
below, pp. 746-753. Affirmed, p. 793.
The war powers of congress and the president are only those which are to be
AND
be read with the realistic purposes of the entire instrument fully in mind.
Restrictions Limit
Supreme Court of Delaware 83 (THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF NEW CASTLE, a municipal corporation of the State of Delaware, Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. ROLLINS OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, INC., Defendant Below, Appellee, No. 155, 1983, 475 A.2d 355; 1984 Del. LEXIS 324, November 21, 1983, Submitted, April 2, 1984, Decided)
The term "restrict" is defined as: To restrain within bounds; to
AND
upon reasonable notice, to prohibit some of those uses already in existence.
Third is our offense
Simualted national security law debates inculcate agency and decision-making skills—that enables activism and avoids cooption
Laura K. Donohue, Associate Professor of Law, Georgetown Law, 4/11/13, National Security Law Pedagogy and the Role of Simulations, http://jnslp.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/National-Security-Law-Pedagogy-and-the-Role-of-Simulations.pdf
The concept of simulations as an aspect of higher education, or in the law
AND
undoubtedly necessary, it suggests one potential direction for the years to come.
Debate over a controversial point of action creates argumentative stasis—that’s key to avoid a devolution of debate into competing truth claims, which destroys the decision-making benefits of the activity
Steinberg and Freeley ‘13
David Director of Debate at U Miami, Former President of CEDA, officer, American Forensic Association and National Communication Association. Lecturer in Communication studies and rhetoric. Advisor to Miami Urban Debate League, Masters in Communication, and Austin, JD, Suffolk University, attorney who focuses on criminal, personal injury and civil rights law, Argumentation and Debate
Critical Thinking for Reasoned Decision Making, Thirteen Edition
Debate is a means of settling differences, so there must be a controversy,
AND
particular point of difference, which will be outlined in the following discussion.
Failure to engage the state means the aff fails, coalitions break down, and hawks seize the political – only engagement solves
Mouffe 2009 (Chantal Mouffe is Professor of Political Theory at the Centre for the Study of Democracy, University of Westminster, “The Importance of Engaging the State”, What is Radical Politics Today?, Edited by Jonathan Pugh, pp. 233-7)
In both Hardt and Negri, and Virno, there is therefore emphasis upon ‘
AND
my view, is how we should conceive the nature of radical politics.
Policy debate is good for education, the development of empathy, and producing real world engagement from participants. Clear rules, a stable topic, and institutional role playing and simulation are integral to the process. The things you criticize about debate make it a unique exercise in active learning.
Lantis 8 (Jeffrey S. Lantis is Professor in the Department of Political Science and Chair of the
International Relations Program at The College of Wooster, “The State of the Active Teaching and Learning Literature”, http://www.isacompss.com/info/samples/thestateoftheactiveteachingandlearningliterature_sample.pdf)
Simulations, games, and role-play represent a third important set of active
AND
topic, the development of empathy, and acquisition and retention of knowledge.
Switching sides allows for a dialogical change in perspectives that resolve the affs impacts and foster sympathy
Bohlin 8 - Dr. Phil. in theoretical philosophy (Stockholm University, 1997) ¶ Senior lecturer (docent) in philosophy, lecturer in history of ideas ¶ Member of the faculty board, chair of the faculty committee for teacher education and educational research (Henrik Bohlin Perspective-dependence and Critical Thinking EBSCO)shaw
Suppose that we are trying to understand and morally assess the customs of a people
AND
and fundamental moral principles and factual beliefs on the other is not sharp.)
Rules and process key
Paroske 11 - Assistant professor of communication, Department of Communication and Visual Arts, University of Michigan ( Argumentation and Federal Rulemaking. Controversia; Fall2011, Vol. 7 Issue 2, p34-53, 20p ebsco)shaw
The process of democratic governance is more than a means to an end. Often
AND
watch of the constitutional branches, rulemakers must pay careful attention to process.
Only we access offense---arguments like framework don’t injure people, but policies do
The idea that a particular style of argument causes personal injury results in censorship
Amanda Anderson 6, Andrew W. Mellon Professor of Humanities and English at Brown University, Spring 2006, “Reply to My Critic(s),” Criticism, Vol. 48, No. 2, p. 281-290
Probyns piece is a mixture of affective fallacy, argument by authority, and bald
AND
and public debate has a vital role to play in such a task.
Critical Theory destroys the ability to engage in productive debates and political solutions. It is wishful thinking that produces only “me-search” and not “research”.
Chandler 2009 (David Chandler is Professor of International Relations at the University of Westminster, “Questioning Global Political Activism”, What is Radical Politics Today?, Edited by Jonathan Pugh, pp. 81-2)
Today more and more people are ‘doing politics’ in their academic work. This
AND
peers and colleagues at the level of political or intellectual debate and organisation.