Opponent: Wake Forest Hurwitz-Sugino | Judge: Gayetsky
1AC - Ban LoW (Miscalc Warming) 1NC - Allied Prolif DA Patent Reform DA Legal K XO CP Biochar CP 2NR - PTX Case
Bulldogdebates
2
Opponent: Georgia Boyce-Feinberg | Judge: Brass
1AC - NSC (Modeling Legitimacy) 1NC - T Drone Shift DA Iran PTX DA State Secrets Doctrine DA Supreme Court CP Block - CP PTX 2NR - CP PTX
GSU
5
Opponent: NYU DeDe | Judge: Fitzmier, Daniel
1AC - National Security Court (Heg Warming) 1NC - Psychoanalysis K Soft Power Adv CP Prez Power DA Warming Good Disease Good Block - Psychoanalysis K Soft Power Adv CP Warming Good 2NR - Psychoanalysis K
GSU
4
Opponent: James Madison BoMi | Judge: Atchison, Jarrod
1AC - National Security Court (I-Law Legitimacy) 1NC - Debt Ceiling DA XO CP Prez Powers DA State Bad K Block - State Bad K 2NR - State Bad K
GSU
1
Opponent: Iowa CrSh | Judge: Donlan, Nick
1AC - National Security Court (I-Law Legitimacy) 1NC - Debt Ceiling DA Death K XO CP Terror DA Block - Death K Case Turns Debt Ceiling DA 2NR - Debt Ceiling DA
GSU
7
Opponent: Liberty BoMu | Judge: Shook, Lindsey
1AC - National Security Court (I-Law Legitimacy) 1NC - Security K XO CP Debt Ceiling DA Case Block - Debt Ceiling DA Case 2NR - Debt Ceiling DA Case
JMU
1
Opponent: George Washington Arsht-Stasaski | Judge: Harper
1AC - Same 1NC - Exec Flex DA XO CP Agamben K Neolib K Block - Agamben K Neolib K 2NR - Neolib K
JMU
5
Opponent: Clarion Baker-Camloh | Judge: Meloche
1AC - NSC (Heg) 1NC - Ontopolitics Risk Analysis Bad Block - Both 2NR - Ontopolitics
JMU
3
Opponent: George Mason Brown-Woodward | Judge: Mendenhall
1AC National Security Courts (Heg) 1NC Black gaze T Block2NR Black gaze
JMU
Octas
Opponent: James Madison Lepp-Miller | Judge: Struth, Susko, Watson
1AC - NSC (Legitimacy Geneva) 1NC - Afghan DA Debt Ceiling DA XO CP Violence K 2NR - K
JMU
Quarters
Opponent: George Washington Nelson-Salathe | Judge: Brass, Garrett, Koch
1AC - NSC (Legitimacy Geneva) 1NC - T XO CP Debt Ceiling DA Neolib K Drone shift DA 2NR - Debt Ceiling Case
Ndt
4
Opponent: West Georgia Ard-Muhammad | Judge: Cook, Corrigan, Taylor
1ac ban nuclear retal miscalc and warming advs 1nc2nr whitenesssettler-master k
Shirley
2
Opponent: Bard College Daniszewski-Nesser | Judge: Leader
1AC - National Security Court (Warming) 1NC - Debate Collapse K Block - Debate Collapse K 2NR - Debate Collapse K
Shirley
3
Opponent: Dartmouth College Chen-Cramer | Judge: Garrett
1AC - National Security Court (Geneva Legitimacy) 1NC - Iran Politics DA Terror DA XO CP Ikenberry CP China DA Block - China DA Ikenberry CP Terror DA 2NR - China DA case
Shirley
6
Opponent: Florida Frank-Prescott | Judge: White
1AC - National Security Court (Geneva Legitimacy) 1NC - T Ice Age DA China PIC Fair Trail PIC Reverse Immigration DA Education K Drone Shift DA Block - Education K China PIC (Uighurs NB 2NR - China PIC (Uighurs NB)
Shirley
7
Opponent: Harvard Herman-Xu | Judge: Woodruff
1AC - National Security Court (Geneva Legitimacy) 1NC - Warming CP Iran PTX DA Prez Powers DA Security K Block - Security K 2NR - Security K
1AC - NSC (Modeling Legitimacy) 1NC - Single Detainee PIC LOAC DA Court Capital DA Agamben K Block - Agamben K PIC Terror Internal Nb 2NR - PIC Terror
tournament
1
Opponent: Emory Adler-Bontha | Judge: Galloway
1AC NSC w Legit and Malaysia 1NC Security K Court CP Iran DA Block Security K Iran DA 2NR Iran DA
tournament
3
Opponent: Wake Forest Sugino-Harris | Judge: Bellon
1AC No LoW (Warming Miscalc) 1NC State Action PIC Antrho K Cap K Fem K Bloc2NR Antrho K
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Cites
Entry
Date
1AC Octas JMU
Tournament: JMU | Round: Octas | Opponent: James Madison Lepp-Miller | Judge: Struth, Susko, Watson Same as round 1
2/25/14
1AC Quarters JMU
Tournament: JMU | Round: Quarters | Opponent: George Washington Nelson-Salathe | Judge: Brass, Garrett, Koch Same as round 1
2/25/14
1AC Round 1 GSU
Tournament: GSU | Round: 1 | Opponent: Iowa CrSh | Judge: Donlan, Nick Advantage 1 Indefinite detention undermines US adherence to the Geneva Conventions Murphy 7 – Sean, Law Professor at GWU “Evolving Geneva Convention Paradigms in the¶ 'War on Terrorism': Applying the Core Rules to the¶ Release of Persons Deemed 'Unprivileged¶ Combatants'”, GW Law Faculty Publications and Other Workscs The general assertion that all detainees at Guantánamo Bay may be detained for the “ AND soon as the reasons which necessitated his¶ internment no longer exist.”143 Continued US violations justify a world paradigm shift against I-Law norms Chaffee 9 – David, JD. Advocacy Counsel at Human Rights First 42 Case W. Res. J. Int'l L. 187, “Dismantling Guantanamo: Facing the Challenges of Continued Detention and Repatriation: The Cost Of Indefinitely Kicking The Can: Why Continued "Prolonged" Detention Is No Solution To Guantanamo”cs The most oft cited reasons by current and former government officials for closing Guantanamo is AND U.S. diplomatic power and ability to champion human rights abroad. Strong Geneva Conventions key to preventing CBW development and use GCSP 5 – Geneva Centre for Security Policy Jun, “Biological and Chemical Weapons Seminar,” http://www.gcsp.ch/e/meetings/Security_Challenges/WMD/Meeting_Conf/2005/BC20Weapons20Seminar/summary.htmcn On 9-10 June 2005, the GCSP hosted an international seminar initiated by AND use but also the production and possession of both chemical and biological weapons. Bioweapons cause extinction Singer 1 – Clifford, professor of nuclear engineering and director of the Program in Arms Control, Disarmament, and International Security http://www.acdis.uiuc.edu/research/SandPs/2001-Sp/SandP_XIII/Singer.htmcn There are, however, two technologies currently under development that may pose a more AND connected human family may be in question when and if this is achieved. Recent technology advances make bioweapons dangerous Garrett 11 – Laurie Garrett is senior fellow for global health at the Council on Foreign Relations, recipient of the 1996 Pulitzer Prize for her coverage of the Ebola epidemic in what was then Zaire, and author of I Heard the Sirens Scream: How Americans Responded to the 9/11 and Anthrax Attacks 12/15, “The Bioterrorist Next Door”. http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/12/14/the_bioterrorist_next_door?page=0,0gw In September, an amiable Dutchman stepped up to the podium at a scientific meeting AND post-2001 anthrax-inspired proliferation of high-security biological laboratories? Reviving obligation to Geneva reverses the signal Beard 7 – Jack, Lecturer at UCLA and former Deputy General Counsel at the DOD “The Geneva Boomerang: The Military Commissions Act of 2006 And US Counterterror operations,” The American Journal of International Lawcn At a fundamental level, unilateral revision of the Geneva Conventions by the United States AND that other countries are unlikely to maintain the stringency of their own commitments. Compliance with detention norms under Geneva shifts public perception of U.S. and restores credibility Murphy 7 – Sean, Law Professor at GWU “Evolving Geneva Convention Paradigms in the¶ 'War on Terrorism': Applying the Core Rules to the¶ Release of Persons Deemed 'Unprivileged¶ Combatants'”, GW Law Faculty Publications and Other Workscs The dominant paradigms of the 1949 Geneva Conventions, which concern either inter-state AND of persons deemed not to be a threat is unlawful and¶ unconscionable. Advantage 2 US credibility is collapsing due to detention policy Welsh 11 – David, J.D. from University of Utah “Procedural Justice Post-9/11: The Effects of Procedurally Unfair Treatment of Detainees on Perceptions of Global Legitimacy”, http://law.unh.edu/assets/images/uploads/publications/unh-law-review-vol-09-no2-welsh.pdfcs The Global War on Terror 1 has been ideologically framed as a struggle between the AND this article offers a psychological perspective of legitimacy in the context of detention. Restoring relationships with allies will be key to co’op on disease and warming Ikenberry 11 – John. G., Albert G. Milbank Professor of Politics and International Affairs at Princeton Spring, http://www.democracyjournal.org/20/a-world-of-our-making.php?page=allcs Grand Strategy as Liberal Order Building American dominance of the global system will eventually yield AND liberal order building, it can begin the process of gaining it back. Human actions are causing a transition to runaway warming – the impact is extinction – the most up-to-date science proves Goldblatt and Watson 12 – Colin, Assistant Professor of Earth System Evolution at the School of Earth and Ocean Sciences at the University of Victoria, British Columbia, PhD from the School of Environmental Sciences at the University of East Anglia, and Andrew J., Fellow of the Royal Society, Professor at the School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, PhD from University of Reading Jan 8, Philosophical Translation of the Royal Society A, http://arxiv.org/abs/1201.1593cs The ultimate climate emergency is a “runaway greenhouse”: a hot and water vapour AND their stars are detected, some will be in a runaway greenhouse state. Diseases cause extinction Quammen 12 – David, Science writer, columnist for Outside magazine for 15 years, worked with various other magazines 9/29, “Could the next big animal-to-human disease wipe us out?,” The Guardiancs Infectious disease is all around us. It's one of the basic processes that ecologists AND collapses? One possible factor is infectious disease, and viruses in particular. American institutional credibility is key to heg – exec-flex arguments are wrong Knowles 9 – Robert, NYU Law School Spring, “Article: American Hegemony and the Foreign Affairs Constitution”, 41 Ariz. St. L.J. 87, Lexiscs The hegemonic model also reduces the need for executive branch flexibility, and the institutional AND courts to reduce the "deference gap" between foreign and domestic cases. Material power’s irrelevant – lack of legitimacy makes heg ineffective Mendelsohn 10 – Barak, assistant professor of political science at Haverford College and fellow at June, “The Question of International Cooperation in the War on Terrorism”, http://www.fpri.org/enotes/201006.mendelsohn.cooperationwarterror.htmlcs Going against common conceptions, I argue that the United States sought to advance more AND This process constrains the hegemon’s actions and prevents the uninhibited exercise of power. Hegemony is key to prevent global security competitions – key to solve nuclear great power wars Brooks, Ikenberry, and Wohlforth 13 – Stephen G. Brooks is Associate Professor of Government at Dartmouth, G. John Ikenberry is the Albert G. Milbank Professor of Politics and International Affairs at Princeton University in the Department of Politics and the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Global Eminence Scholar at Kyung Hee University, and William C. Wohlforth, Daniel Webster Professor in the Department of Government at Dartmouth “Don’t Come Home, America: The Case Against Retrenchment, International Security, Vol. 37, No. 3 (Winter 2012/13), pp. 7–51, http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/files/IS3703_Brooks20Wohlforth20Ikenberry.pdfgw A core premise of deep engagement is that it prevents the emergence of a far AND Moreover, switching between offshore and onshore balancing could well be dif ficult. Heg is key to the economy Brooks, Ikenberry, and Wohlforth 13 – Stephen G. Brooks is Associate Professor of Government at Dartmouth, G. John Ikenberry is the Albert G. Milbank Professor of Politics and International Affairs at Princeton University in the Department of Politics and the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Global Eminence Scholar at Kyung Hee University, and William C. Wohlforth, Daniel Webster Professor in the Department of Government at Dartmouth “Don’t Come Home, America: The Case Against Retrenchment, International Security, Vol. 37, No. 3 (Winter 2012/13), pp. 7–51, http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/files/IS3703_Brooks20Wohlforth20Ikenberry.pdfgw Deep engagement is based on a premise central to realist scholarship from E.H AND world economy—a long-standing U.S. national interest. In addition to ensuring the global economy against important sources of insecurity, the extensive AND needed to accomplish this mission—would likely be curtailed to some degree. Judicial involvement is key to the credibility of detention decisions Waxman 9 – Matthew, Professor of Law and Chair of Law and National Seucirty of the Roger Hertog Program November, “Legislating the War on Terror: An Agenda for Reform”cs Judicial review can help safeguard liberty and enhance the credibility at home and abroad of AND to contest what with the assistance of counsel? Transparent determinations of what? A National Security Court restores our global image – oversight is key Sulmasy 9 – Glenn, Associate Professor of Law at the US Coast Guard Academy and National April 13, “THE NEED FOR A NATIONAL SECURITY COURT SYSTEM”cs THE WAY FORWARD¶ The President, Secretary Gates and Secretary Rice have all declared AND dedicated to the administration of justice and to upholding the rule of law. Plan The United States Congress should establish an Article III National Security Court with exclusive jurisdiction over the United States’ indefinite detention policy, specifically individuals detained pursuant to P.L. 107-40. Congress should mandate that all such individuals be expediently tried or released.
Solvency Congressional creation of a National Security Court is crucial to restore legitimacy and rule of law in detention Welsh 11 – David, J.D. from University of Utah “Procedural Justice Post-9/11: The Effects of Procedurally Unfair Treatment of Detainees on Perceptions of Global Legitimacy”, http://law.unh.edu/assets/images/uploads/publications/unh-law-review-vol-09-no2-welsh.pdfcs In the context of the War on Terror, legitimacy is the critical missing element AND with the unique procedural issues created by a growing number of suspected terrorists. NSC solves legitimacy at home and abroad Goldsmith and Katyal 7 – Jack, Harvard law professor, was an assistant attorney general from 2003 to 2004 and Neal, Georgetown law professor, represented the plaintiff in the 2006 Supreme Court case that struck down the Guantánamo tribunals Jul 11, http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/11/opinion/11katyal.html?_r=2andadxnnl=1andoref=sloginandadxnnlx=1184158966-zBttZkBJomgptivaDrg0egcs NEARLY six years after 9/11, the government’s system for detaining terrorists without AND no such luxury. We must create sensible institutions for the long haul. NSC solves any flexibility issues Goldsmith 9 – Jack, Henry L. Shattuck Professor at Harvard Law School Feb 4, “Long-Term Terrorist Detention and Our National Security Court”cs The national security court might also replace criminal trials by military commission, courts martial AND the ordinary criminal trial processes where the government should bear ordinary burdens.45 No circumvention – the President would use the NSC Lunday 8 – Kevin E., Captain and judge advocate in the U.S. Coast Guard, with Harvey Rishikof, professor of law and former chair of the Department of National Security Strategy, National War College Fall, “Due Process Is a Strategic Choice: Legitimacy and the Establishment of an Article III National Security Court,” 39 Cal. W. Int'l L.J. 87cs The primary triggering mechanism for establishing NSC jurisdiction would fall within the discretion and control AND , it would be permitted to sua sponte transfer the case to NSC jurisdiction Congress has already passed detention restrictions Alexander 13 – Janet Cooper, law professor at Stanford March 21, "The Law-Free Zone and Back Again," Illinois Law Review, illinoislawreview.org/wp-content/ilr-content/articles/2013/2/Alexander.pdfcs Congress also passed legislation requiring suspected members of al- Qaeda or “associated forces AND , the D.C. Circuit has since rendered those protections toothless. Only Congress can do the plan Lunday 8 – Kevin E., Captain and judge advocate in the U.S. Coast Guard, with Harvey Rishikof, professor of law and former chair of the Department of National Security Strategy, National War College Fall, “Due Process Is a Strategic Choice: Legitimacy and the Establishment of an Article III National Security Court,” 39 Cal. W. Int'l L.J. 87cs These proposals deserve careful scrutiny by the public, and particularly by the U. AND National Security Court, and addressing the most prominent criticisms of the concept.
9/22/13
1AC Round 1 JMU
Tournament: JMU | Round: 1 | Opponent: George Washington Arsht-Stasaski | Judge: Harper Plan The United States Congress should establish an Article III National Security Court with exclusive jurisdiction over the United States’ indefinite detention policy, specifically individuals detained pursuant to P.L. 107-40. Congress should mandate that all such individuals be expediently tried or released. Advantage 1 Indefinite detention undermines US adherence to the Geneva Conventions Murphy 7 – Sean, Law Professor at GWU “Evolving Geneva Convention Paradigms in the¶ 'War on Terrorism': Applying the Core Rules to the¶ Release of Persons Deemed 'Unprivileged¶ Combatants'”, GW Law Faculty Publications and Other Workscs The general assertion that all detainees at Guantánamo Bay may be detained for the “ AND soon as the reasons which necessitated his¶ internment no longer exist.”143 Continued US violations justify a world paradigm shift against I-Law norms Chaffee 9 – David, JD. Advocacy Counsel at Human Rights First 42 Case W. Res. J. Int'l L. 187, “Dismantling Guantanamo: Facing the Challenges of Continued Detention and Repatriation: The Cost Of Indefinitely Kicking The Can: Why Continued "Prolonged" Detention Is No Solution To Guantanamo”cs The most oft cited reasons by current and former government officials for closing Guantanamo is AND U.S. diplomatic power and ability to champion human rights abroad. Strong Geneva Conventions key to preventing CBW development and use GCSP 5 – Geneva Centre for Security Policy Jun, “Biological and Chemical Weapons Seminar,” http://www.gcsp.ch/e/meetings/Security_Challenges/WMD/Meeting_Conf/2005/BC20Weapons20Seminar/summary.htmcn On 9-10 June 2005, the GCSP hosted an international seminar initiated by AND use but also the production and possession of both chemical and biological weapons. Bioweapons cause extinction Singer 1 – Clifford, professor of nuclear engineering and director of the Program in Arms Control, Disarmament, and International Security http://www.acdis.uiuc.edu/research/SandPs/2001-Sp/SandP_XIII/Singer.htmcn There are, however, two technologies currently under development that may pose a more AND connected human family may be in question when and if this is achieved. Recent technology advances make bioweapons dangerous Garrett 11 – Laurie Garrett is senior fellow for global health at the Council on Foreign Relations, recipient of the 1996 Pulitzer Prize for her coverage of the Ebola epidemic in what was then Zaire, and author of I Heard the Sirens Scream: How Americans Responded to the 9/11 and Anthrax Attacks 12/15, “The Bioterrorist Next Door”. http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/12/14/the_bioterrorist_next_door?page=0,0gw In September, an amiable Dutchman stepped up to the podium at a scientific meeting AND post-2001 anthrax-inspired proliferation of high-security biological laboratories? Self-imposed restraint of violations sends a signal that revives the Geneva Conventions Beard 7 – Jack, Lecturer at UCLA and former Deputy General Counsel at the DOD “The Geneva Boomerang: The Military Commissions Act of 2006 And US Counterterror operations,” The American Journal of International Lawcn At a fundamental level, unilateral revision of the Geneva Conventions by the United States AND that other countries are unlikely to maintain the stringency of their own commitments. Compliance with detention norms under Geneva shifts public perception of U.S. and restores credibility Murphy 7 – Sean, Law Professor at GWU “Evolving Geneva Convention Paradigms in the¶ 'War on Terrorism': Applying the Core Rules to the¶ Release of Persons Deemed 'Unprivileged¶ Combatants'”, GW Law Faculty Publications and Other Workscs The dominant paradigms of the 1949 Geneva Conventions, which concern either inter-state AND of persons deemed not to be a threat is unlawful and¶ unconscionable. Fear of reciprocal violations from a credible institution deter violations of I-Law – codification isn’t necessary D’Amato 10 – Anthony, Northwestern University School of Law Dec, http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1102andcontext=facultyworkingpaperscs International law is enforced by the process I have described as reciprocal-entitlement AND fully understood without reference to the steps it takes to preserve those entitlements. Advantage 2 US credibility is collapsing due to detention policy Welsh 11 – David, J.D. from University of Utah “Procedural Justice Post-9/11: The Effects of Procedurally Unfair Treatment of Detainees on Perceptions of Global Legitimacy”, http://law.unh.edu/assets/images/uploads/publications/unh-law-review-vol-09-no2-welsh.pdfcs The Global War on Terror 1 has been ideologically framed as a struggle between the AND this article offers a psychological perspective of legitimacy in the context of detention. That credibility is key to mobilize cooperation on global issues like warming and disease Ikenberry 11 – John. G., Albert G. Milbank Professor of Politics and International Affairs at Princeton Spring, http://www.democracyjournal.org/20/a-world-of-our-making.php?page=allcs Grand Strategy as Liberal Order Building American dominance of the global system will eventually yield AND liberal order building, it can begin the process of gaining it back. Warming turns every impact and causes extinction – 4 degrees makes trends irreversible Roberts 13 – David, Grist *citing the World Bank comprehensive climate study Jan 10, http://grist.org/climate-energy/climate-alarmism-the-idea-is-surreal/cs What would 4 degrees look like? A recent World Bank review of the science reminds us. First, it’ll get hot:
Projections for a 4°C world show a dramatic increase in the intensity and AND “alarmist” in this context. What level of alarm is adequate? Warming makes oceans acidic – the impact is extinction Kristof 6 – Nicholas, New York Times, American journalist, author, op-ed columnist, and a winner of two Pulitzer Prizes Jul, “Scandal Below the Surface,” Onlinecn If you think of the earth’s surface as a great beaker, then it’s filled AND . We stand, so to speak, on the shoulders of plankton. Globalization means unchecked disease spread causes extinction Keating 9 – Joshua, Foreign Policy Editor 11-13, http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2009/11/13/the_end_of_the_world?page=fullcn How it could happen: Throughout history, plagues have brought civilizations to their knees AND . Biological weapons experimentation has added a new and just as troubling complication. Detention erodes the institutional credibility that supports US hegemony Knowles 9 – Robert, NYU Law School Spring, “Article: American Hegemony and the Foreign Affairs Constitution”, 41 Ariz. St. L.J. 87, Lexiscs The hegemonic model also reduces the need for executive branch flexibility, and the institutional AND courts to reduce the "deference gap" between foreign and domestic cases. Material power’s irrelevant – lack of legitimacy makes heg ineffective Mendelsohn 10 – Barak, assistant professor of political science at Haverford College and fellow at June, “The Question of International Cooperation in the War on Terrorism”, http://www.fpri.org/enotes/201006.mendelsohn.cooperationwarterror.htmlcs Going against common conceptions, I argue that the United States sought to advance more AND This process constrains the hegemon’s actions and prevents the uninhibited exercise of power. Hegemony is key to prevent global security competitions – key to solve nuclear great power wars Brooks, Ikenberry, and Wohlforth 13 – Stephen G. Brooks is Associate Professor of Government at Dartmouth, G. John Ikenberry is the Albert G. Milbank Professor of Politics and International Affairs at Princeton University in the Department of Politics and the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Global Eminence Scholar at Kyung Hee University, and William C. Wohlforth, Daniel Webster Professor in the Department of Government at Dartmouth “Don’t Come Home, America: The Case Against Retrenchment, International Security, Vol. 37, No. 3 (Winter 2012/13), pp. 7–51, http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/files/IS3703_Brooks20Wohlforth20Ikenberry.pdfgw A core premise of deep engagement is that it prevents the emergence of a far AND Moreover, switching between offshore and onshore balancing could well be dif ficult. Judicial involvement is key to the credibility of detention decisions Waxman 9 – Matthew, Professor of Law and Chair of Law and National Seucirty of the Roger Hertog Program November, “Legislating the War on Terror: An Agenda for Reform”cs Judicial review can help safeguard liberty and enhance the credibility at home and abroad of AND to contest what with the assistance of counsel? Transparent determinations of what? A National Security Court restores our global image – oversight is key Sulmasy 9 – Glenn, Associate Professor of Law at the US Coast Guard Academy and National April 13, “THE NEED FOR A NATIONAL SECURITY COURT SYSTEM”cs THE WAY FORWARD¶ The President, Secretary Gates and Secretary Rice have all declared AND dedicated to the administration of justice and to upholding the rule of law. Solvency A Congressionally created National Security Court restores legitimacy to the detention process Goldsmith and Katyal 7 – Jack, Harvard law professor, was an assistant attorney general from 2003 to 2004 and Neal, Georgetown law professor, represented the plaintiff in the 2006 Supreme Court case that struck down the Guantánamo tribunals Jul 11, http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/11/opinion/11katyal.html?_r=2andadxnnl=1andoref=sloginandadxnnlx=1184158966-zBttZkBJomgptivaDrg0egcs NEARLY six years after 9/11, the government’s system for detaining terrorists without AND no such luxury. We must create sensible institutions for the long haul. Institutional legitimacy creates reservoirs of support that strengthen the rule of law Welsh 11 – David, J.D. from University of Utah “Procedural Justice Post-9/11: The Effects of Procedurally Unfair Treatment of Detainees on Perceptions of Global Legitimacy”, http://law.unh.edu/assets/images/uploads/publications/unh-law-review-vol-09-no2-welsh.pdfcs In the context of the War on Terror, legitimacy is the critical missing element AND with the unique procedural issues created by a growing number of suspected terrorists. NSC can’t and won’t be circumvented Lunday 8 – Kevin E., Captain and judge advocate in the U.S. Coast Guard, with Harvey Rishikof, professor of law and former chair of the Department of National Security Strategy, National War College Fall, “Due Process Is a Strategic Choice: Legitimacy and the Establishment of an Article III National Security Court,” 39 Cal. W. Int'l L.J. 87cs The primary triggering mechanism for establishing NSC jurisdiction would fall within the discretion and control AND , it would be permitted to sua sponte transfer the case to NSC jurisdiction NSC solves any flexibility issues Goldsmith 9 – Jack, Henry L. Shattuck Professor at Harvard Law School Feb 4, “Long-Term Terrorist Detention and Our National Security Court”cs The national security court might also replace criminal trials by military commission, courts martial AND the ordinary criminal trial processes where the government should bear ordinary burdens.45
The United States Congress should establish an Article III National Security Court with exclusive jurisdiction over the United States’ indefinite detention policy, specifically individuals detained pursuant to P.L. 107-40. Congress should mandate that all such individuals be expediently tried or released.
Advantage 1 is Legitimacy
Advantage 1 is Legitimacy
US legitimacy is collapsing due to detention policy
Welsh 11 – David, J.D. from University of Utah ~"Procedural Justice Post-9/11: The Effects of Procedurally Unfair Treatment of Detainees on Perceptions of Global Legitimacy", http://law.unh.edu/assets/images/uploads/publications/unh-law-review-vol-09-no2-welsh.pdf~~cs The Global War on Terror 1 has been ideologically framed as a struggle between the AND this article offers a psychological perspective of legitimacy in the context of detention.
That legitimacy is key to mobilize cooperation on global issues like warming
Ikenberry 11 – John. G., Albert G. Milbank Professor of Politics and International Affairs at Princeton ~Spring, http://www.democracyjournal.org/20/a-world-of-our-making.php?page=all~~cs Grand Strategy as Liberal Order Building American dominance of the global system will eventually yield AND liberal order building, it can begin the process of gaining it back.
Warming is real, anthropogenic, and causes mass death
Deibel 7 – Terry L, Professor of IR at National War College ~"Foreign Affairs Strategy: Logic for American Statecraft", Conclusion: American Foreign Affairs Strategy Today~cs Finally, there is one major existential threat to American security (as well as AND States, but potentially to the continued existence of life on this planet.
Adopting a mindset of scientific inquiry for climate change makes sense because it’s a phenomenon uniquely suited to an empiricist methodology
Our framing of warming overcomes disbelief and mobilizes public responses
Romm 12 – Joe, Ph.D. in physics from MIT, Fellow at American Progress and is the editor of Climate Progress, acting assistant secretary of energy for energy efficiency and renewable energy in 1997, Time named him a "Hero of the Environment? and "The Web’s most influential climate-change blogger." ~"Apocalypse Not: The Oscars, The Media And The Myth of ’Constant Repetition of Doomsday Messages’ on Climate", http://thinkprogress.org/romm/2012/02/26/432546/apocalypse-not-oscars-media-myth-of-repetition-of-doomsday-messages-on-climate/~~23more-432546~~cs The two greatest myths about global warming communications are 1) constant repetition of doomsday AND by most of the rest of the media, intelligentsia and popular culture.
The inclusion of hypothetical impact scenarios supercharges the deliberative process by providing a normative means of assessing consequences
Larsen 9 – Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Philosophy and History of Technology, Division of History of Science and Technology, Teknikringen, Stockholm, Sweden ~July, Habitat International, Volume 33, Issue 3, July 2009, Pages 260–266, Climate Change and Human Settlements: Climate change scenarios and citizen-participation: Mitigation and adaptation perspectives in constructing sustainable futures~cs In constructing normative scenarios a set of images are generated illustrating future ways of AND result, both the content sustainability and the capacity to act might increase.
A National Security Court restores our global image – oversight is key
Sulmasy 9 – Glenn, Associate Professor of Law at the US Coast Guard Academy and National ~April 13, "THE NEED FOR A NATIONAL SECURITY COURT SYSTEM"~cs THE WAY FORWARD¶ The President, Secretary Gates and Secretary Rice have all declared AND dedicated to the administration of justice and to upholding the rule of law.
Solvency
A Congressionally created National Security Court restores legitimacy to the detention process
Institutional legitimacy creates reservoirs of support that strengthen the rule of law
Welsh 11 – David, J.D. from University of Utah ~"Procedural Justice Post-9/11: The Effects of Procedurally Unfair Treatment of Detainees on Perceptions of Global Legitimacy", http://law.unh.edu/assets/images/uploads/publications/unh-law-review-vol-09-no2-welsh.pdf~~cs In the context of the War on Terror, legitimacy is the critical missing element AND with the unique procedural issues created by a growing number of suspected terrorists.
Role of the ballot’s to simulate enactment of the plan – Academic debate regarding war powers is makes checks on excessive presidential authority effective—-college students key
Young 13 – Kelly Michael, Associate Professor of Communication and Director of Forensics at Wayne State University ~"Why Should We Debate About Restriction of Presidential War Powers", 9/4, public.cedadebate.org/node/13~cs Beyond its obviously timeliness, AND presidency.
Switch-side debate inculcates skills that empirically improve climate policy outcomes
Mitchel 10 – Gordon, Associate Professor and Director of Graduate Studies in the Department AND strives to generate rigorous scholarship addressing the role of argumentation and debate in society ~SWITCH-SIDE DEBATING MEETS DEMAND-DRIVEN RHETORIC OF SCIENCE. MITCHELL, GORDON R.1 Rhetoric 26 Public Affairs; Spring2010, Vol. 13 Issue 1, p95-120, 26p~cs The watchwords for the intelligence community’s debating initiative— collaboration, critical thinking, AND challenge involves finding meaning in inverted rhetorical situations characterized by an endemic surplus of heterogeneous content.
The debate space provides the means for deliberative policymaking, which is crucial to solve warming through public policy – this subsumes their critiques of traditional persuasion
Herbeck and Isham 10 –Associate Profess of Economics at Middlebury College and member of the Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources at Middlebury College ~http://www.thesolutionsjournal.com/node/775-http://www.thesolutionsjournal.com/node/775~~cs Getting to 350 parts per million CO2 in the atmosphere will require massive investments AND , including those on pressing issues related to climate change and clean energy.
Judicial involvement is key to the credibility of detention decisions
Waxman 9 – Matthew, Professor of Law and Chair of Law and National Seucirty of the Roger Hertog Program ~November, "Legislating the War on Terror: An Agenda for Reform"~cs Judicial review can help safeguard liberty and enhance the credibility at home and abroad of AND to contest what with the assistance of counsel? Transparent determinations of what?
11/29/13
1AC Round 3 GSU
Tournament: GSU | Round: 4 | Opponent: James Madison BoMi | Judge: Atchison, Jarrod Same as round 1
The United States Congress should establish an Article III National Security Court with exclusive jurisdiction over the United States’ indefinite detention policy, specifically individuals detained pursuant to P.L. 107-40. Congress should mandate that all such indiviuals be expediently tried or released.
Advantage 1
Advantage 1 is Legitimacy
US credibility is collapsing due to detention policy
Welsh 11 – David, J.D. from University of Utah ~"Procedural Justice Post-9/11: The Effects of Procedurally Unfair Treatment of Detainees on Perceptions of Global Legitimacy", http://law.unh.edu/assets/images/uploads/publications/unh-law-review-vol-09-no2-welsh.pdf~~cs The Global War on Terror 1 has been ideologically framed as a struggle between the AND this article offers a psychological perspective of legitimacy in the context of detention.
That credibility is key to mobilize cooperation on global issues like warming and disease
Ikenberry 11 – John. G., Albert G. Milbank Professor of Politics and International Affairs at Princeton ~Spring, http://www.democracyjournal.org/20/a-world-of-our-making.php?page=all~~cs Grand Strategy as Liberal Order Building American dominance of the global system will eventually yield AND liberal order building, it can begin the process of gaining it back.
Warming turns every impact and causes extinction – 4 degrees makes trends irreversible
Projections for a 4°C world show a dramatic increase in the intensity and AND "alarmist" in this context. What level of alarm is adequate?
Warming makes oceans acidic – the impact is extinction
Kristof 6 – Nicholas, New York Times, American journalist, author, op-ed columnist, and a winner of two Pulitzer Prizes ~Jul, "Scandal Below the Surface," Online~cn If you think of the earth’s surface as a great beaker, then it’s filled AND . We stand, so to speak, on the shoulders of plankton.
Globalization means unchecked disease spread causes extinction
Detention erodes the institutional credibility that supports US hegemony
Knowles 9 – Robert, NYU Law School ~Spring, "Article: American Hegemony and the Foreign Affairs Constitution", 41 Ariz. St. L.J. 87, Lexis~cs The hegemonic model also reduces the need for executive branch flexibility, and the institutional AND courts to reduce the "deference gap" between foreign and domestic cases.
Material power’s irrelevant – lack of legitimacy makes heg ineffective
Mendelsohn 10 – Barak, assistant professor of political science at Haverford College and fellow at June, "The Question of International Cooperation in the War on Terrorism", http://www.fpri.org/enotes/201006.mendelsohn.cooperationwarterror.html~~cs Going against common conceptions, I argue that the United States sought to advance more AND This process constrains the hegemon’s actions and prevents the uninhibited exercise of power.
Decline isn’t inevitable – prefer long-term studies to short-term conjectures
Lieber 8 – Robert, Prof of Intl Affairs at Georgetown, World Affairs ~Summer, http://www.worldaffairsjournal.org/200820-20Summer/full-Lieber.html~~cn In the end, then, this country’s structural advantages matter much more than economic AND The critiques come and go. The object of their contempt never does.
Hegemony is key to prevent extinction and reduce structural violence
Status seeking is inevitable – hegemonic deterrence is key to alter incentive structures to prevent conflict
Wohlforth 9 – professor of government at Dartmouth ~William, "Unipolarity, Status Competition, and Great Power War," World Affairs, January, project muse~gw The upshot is a near scholarly consensus that unpolarity’s consequences for great power conflict are AND inherently scarce, and competitions for status tend to be zero sum.9
Any alternative locks in the war system – an infinite number of non-falsifiable root causes mean empirics and incentive theory are the only adequate methods to understand war
Moore 4 – Dir. Center for Security Law t University of Virginia, 7-time Presidential appointee, 26 Honorary Editor of the American Journal of International Law ~Solving the War Puzzle: Beyond the Democratic Peace, John Norton Moore, page 27-31.~gw If major interstate war is predominantly a product of a synergy between a potential nondemocratic AND in general, happens when levels of deterrence are dramatically increased or decreased?
Realism is inevitable and good
Mearsheimer 1 – John J., Prof. of Political Science at U Chicago ~The Tragedy of Great Power Politics, pp. 1-28~cn Alas, the claim that security competition and war between the great powers have been AND world as it is, not as we would like it to be.
Judicial involvement is key to the credibility of detention decisions
Waxman 9 – Matthew, Professor of Law and Chair of Law and National Seucirty of the Roger Hertog Program ~November, "Legislating the War on Terror: An Agenda for Reform"~cs Judicial review can help safeguard liberty and enhance the credibility at home and abroad of AND to contest what with the assistance of counsel? Transparent determinations of what?
A National Security Court restores our global image – oversight is key
Sulmasy 9 – Glenn, Associate Professor of Law at the US Coast Guard Academy and National ~April 13, "THE NEED FOR A NATIONAL SECURITY COURT SYSTEM"~cs THE WAY FORWARD¶ The President, Secretary Gates and Secretary Rice have all declared AND dedicated to the administration of justice and to upholding the rule of law.
Solvency
A Congressionally created National Security Court restores legitimacy to the detention process
Institutional legitimacy creates reservoirs of support that strengthen the rule of law
Welsh 11 – David, J.D. from University of Utah ~"Procedural Justice Post-9/11: The Effects of Procedurally Unfair Treatment of Detainees on Perceptions of Global Legitimacy", http://law.unh.edu/assets/images/uploads/publications/unh-law-review-vol-09-no2-welsh.pdf~~cs In the context of the War on Terror, legitimacy is the critical missing element AND with the unique procedural issues created by a growing number of suspected terrorists.
NSC can’t and won’t be circumvented
Lunday 8 – Kevin E., Captain and judge advocate in the U.S. Coast Guard, with Harvey Rishikof, professor of law and former chair of the Department of National Security Strategy, National War College ~Fall, "Due Process Is a Strategic Choice: Legitimacy and the Establishment of an Article III National Security Court," 39 Cal. W. Int’l L.J. 87~cs The primary triggering mechanism for establishing NSC jurisdiction would fall within the discretion and control AND , it would be permitted to sua sponte transfer the case to NSC jurisdiction
NSC solves any flexibility issues
Goldsmith 9 – Jack, Henry L. Shattuck Professor at Harvard Law School ~Feb 4, "Long-Term Terrorist Detention and Our National Security Court"~cs The national security court might also replace criminal trials by military commission, courts martial AND the ordinary criminal trial processes where the government should bear ordinary burdens.45
Consequentialism is key to ethical policymaking
Isaac 2 – Jeffrey, Professor of Political Science at Indiana University ~Spring, Dissent, vol. 49, no. 2~cn Power is not a dirty word or an unfortunate feature of the world. It AND not true believers. It promotes arrogance. And it undermines political effectiveness.
A reformist mindset is key to prevent extinction – political inaction abdicates power to authoritarians
Boggs 97 – Carl, Ph.D., Professor of Political Science, National University ~"The great retreat: Decline of the public sphere in late twentieth-century America," Theory and Society, 26: 741-780~cn The decline of the public sphere in late twentieth-century America poses a series AND universal, collec- tive interests that had vanished from civil society.75
Abandoning state reforms causes worse forces to fill-in
Barbrook 97 – Dr. Richard, Professor of Social Sciences, University of Westminister ~Jun 5, http://www.nettime.org/Lists-Archives/nettime-l-9706/msg00034.html~~gw I thought that this position is clear from my remarks about the ultra-left AND can be a fun artistic pose. However, human suffering is not.
There are no prior questions – empirical validity is enough basis for action – their approach is inaccurate and undermines real problem-solving
Owen 2 – David, Political Theorist at the University of Southampton ~Jul, "Re-orienting International Relations: On Pragmatism, Pluralism and Practical Reasoning," Millennium - Journal of International Studies; 31; 653~cn Commenting on the ’philosophical turn’ in IR, Weaver remarks that ’~a~ AND into the promotion of the pursuit of generality over that of empirical validity.
Advantage 1
Back to legitimacy
The U.S. will act like the hegemon, even if it can’t anymore – this is a net turn to their heg bad arguments
Calleo 9 – David, Professor at The Johns Hopkins University and Dean Acheson Professor at its Nitze School of Advanced International Studies ~"Follies of Power: America’s Unipolar Fantasy" p. 4-5~cn It is tempting to believe that America’s recent misadventures will discredit and suppress our hegemonic AND tide, all the makings of a grand historical tragedy are at hand.
Hegemony prevents counterbalancing and deters challengers
Brooks, Ikenberry, and Wohlforth 13 – Stephen G. Brooks is Associate Professor of Government at Dartmouth, G. John Ikenberry is the Albert G. Milbank Professor of Politics and International Affairs at Princeton University in the Department of Politics and the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Global Eminence Scholar at Kyung Hee University, and William C. Wohlforth, Daniel Webster Professor in the Department of Government at Dartmouth ~"Don’t Come Home, America: The Case Against Retrenchment, International Security, Vol. 37, No. 3 (Winter 2012/13), pp. 7–51, http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/files/IS3703_Brooks20Wohlforth20Ikenberry.pdf~~gw Bringing together the thrust of many of the arguments discussed so far underlines the degree AND in turn makes it easier to sustain the policy over the long term.
Even if decline is inevitable, maintaining heg is key ensure a smooth transition
Zakaria 8 – Fareed, Editor of Newsweek International ~May/June 2008 Foreign Affairs, "The Future of American Power"~cn The emerging international system is likely to be quite different from those that have preceded AND -American world is a reality — and embraces and celebrates that fact.
The United States Congress should establish an Article III National Security Court with exclusive jurisdiction over the United States’ indefinite detention policy, specifically individuals detained pursuant to P.L. 107-40. Congress should mandate that all such individuals be expediently tried or released.
Advantage 1
Advantage 1 is I Law
Indefinite detention undermines US adherence to the Geneva Conventions
Murphy 7 – Sean, Law Professor at GWU ~"Evolving Geneva Convention Paradigms in the¶ ’War on Terrorism’: Applying the Core Rules to the¶ Release of Persons Deemed ’Unprivileged¶ Combatants’", GW Law Faculty Publications 26 Other Works~cs The general assertion that all detainees at Guantánamo Bay may be detained for the " AND soon as the reasons which necessitated his¶ internment no longer exist."143
Continued US violations justify a world paradigm shift against I-Law norms
Chaffee 9 – David, JD. Advocacy Counsel at Human Rights First ~42 Case W. Res. J. Int’l L. 187, "Dismantling Guantanamo: Facing the Challenges of Continued Detention and Repatriation: The Cost Of Indefinitely Kicking The Can: Why Continued "Prolonged" Detention Is No Solution To Guantanamo"~cs The most oft cited reasons by current and former government officials for closing Guantanamo is AND U.S. diplomatic power and ability to champion human rights abroad.
Strong Geneva Conventions key to preventing CBW development and use
Recent technology advances make bioweapons dangerous
Garrett 11 – Laurie Garrett is senior fellow for global health at the Council on Foreign Relations, recipient of the 1996 Pulitzer Prize for her coverage of the Ebola epidemic in what was then Zaire, and author of I Heard the Sirens Scream: How Americans Responded to the 9/11 and Anthrax Attacks ~12/15, "The Bioterrorist Next Door". http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/12/14/the_bioterrorist_next_door?page=0,0-http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/12/14/the_bioterrorist_next_door?page=0,0~gw In September, an amiable Dutchman stepped up to the podium at a scientific meeting AND post-2001 anthrax-inspired proliferation of high-security biological laboratories?
Self-imposed restraint of violations sends a signal that revives the Geneva Conventions
Beard 7 – Jack, Lecturer at UCLA and former Deputy General Counsel at the DOD ~"The Geneva Boomerang: The Military Commissions Act of 2006 And US Counterterror operations," The American Journal of International Law~cn At a fundamental level, unilateral revision of the Geneva Conventions by the United States AND that other countries are unlikely to maintain the stringency of their own commitments.
Compliance with detention norms under Geneva shifts public perception of U.S. and restores credibility
Murphy 7 – Sean, Law Professor at GWU ~"Evolving Geneva Convention Paradigms in the¶ ’War on Terrorism’: Applying the Core Rules to the¶ Release of Persons Deemed ’Unprivileged¶ Combatants’", GW Law Faculty Publications 26 Other Works~cs The dominant paradigms of the 1949 Geneva Conventions, which concern either inter-state AND of persons deemed not to be a threat is unlawful and¶ unconscionable.
Fear of reciprocal violations from a credible institution deter violations of I-Law – codification isn’t necessary
US credibility is collapsing due to detention policy
Welsh 11 – David, J.D. from University of Utah ~"Procedural Justice Post-9/11: The Effects of Procedurally Unfair Treatment of Detainees on Perceptions of Global Legitimacy", http://law.unh.edu/assets/images/uploads/publications/unh-law-review-vol-09-no2-welsh.pdf~~cs The Global War on Terror 1 has been ideologically framed as a struggle between the AND this article offers a psychological perspective of legitimacy in the context of detention.
That credibility is key to mobilize cooperation on global issues like warming and disease
Ikenberry 11 – John. G., Albert G. Milbank Professor of Politics and International Affairs at Princeton ~Spring, http://www.democracyjournal.org/20/a-world-of-our-making.php?page=all~~cs Grand Strategy as Liberal Order Building American dominance of the global system will eventually yield AND liberal order building, it can begin the process of gaining it back.
Warming turns every impact and causes extinction – 4 degrees makes trends irreversible
Projections for a 4°C world show a dramatic increase in the intensity and AND "alarmist" in this context. What level of alarm is adequate?
Warming makes oceans acidic – the impact is extinction
Kristof 6 – Nicholas, New York Times, American journalist, author, op-ed columnist, and a winner of two Pulitzer Prizes ~Jul, "Scandal Below the Surface," Online~cn If you think of the earth’s surface as a great beaker, then it’s filled AND . We stand, so to speak, on the shoulders of plankton.
Globalization means unchecked disease spread causes extinction
Detention erodes the institutional credibility that supports US hegemony
Knowles 9 – Robert, NYU Law School ~Spring, "Article: American Hegemony and the Foreign Affairs Constitution", 41 Ariz. St. L.J. 87, Lexis~cs The hegemonic model also reduces the need for executive branch flexibility, and the institutional AND courts to reduce the "deference gap" between foreign and domestic cases.
Material power’s irrelevant – lack of legitimacy makes heg ineffective
Mendelsohn 10 – Barak, assistant professor of political science at Haverford College and fellow at June, "The Question of International Cooperation in the War on Terrorism", http://www.fpri.org/enotes/201006.mendelsohn.cooperationwarterror.html~~cs Going against common conceptions, I argue that the United States sought to advance more AND This process constrains the hegemon’s actions and prevents the uninhibited exercise of power.
Hegemony is key to prevent global security competitions – key to solve nuclear great power wars
Brooks, Ikenberry, and Wohlforth 13 – Stephen G. Brooks is Associate Professor of Government at Dartmouth, G. John Ikenberry is the Albert G. Milbank Professor of Politics and International Affairs at Princeton University in the Department of Politics and the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Global Eminence Scholar at Kyung Hee University, and William C. Wohlforth, Daniel Webster Professor in the Department of Government at Dartmouth ~"Don’t Come Home, America: The Case Against Retrenchment, International Security, Vol. 37, No. 3 (Winter 2012/13), pp. 7–51, http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/files/IS3703_Brooks20Wohlforth20Ikenberry.pdf~~gw A core premise of deep engagement is that it prevents the emergence of a far AND Moreover, switching between offshore and onshore balancing could well be dif ficult.
Judicial involvement is key to the credibility of detention decisions
Waxman 9 – Matthew, Professor of Law and Chair of Law and National Seucirty of the Roger Hertog Program ~November, "Legislating the War on Terror: An Agenda for Reform"~cs Judicial review can help safeguard liberty and enhance the credibility at home and abroad of AND to contest what with the assistance of counsel? Transparent determinations of what?
A National Security Court restores our global image – oversight is key
Sulmasy 9 – Glenn, Associate Professor of Law at the US Coast Guard Academy and National ~April 13, "THE NEED FOR A NATIONAL SECURITY COURT SYSTEM"~cs THE WAY FORWARD¶ The President, Secretary Gates and Secretary Rice have all declared AND dedicated to the administration of justice and to upholding the rule of law.
Solvency
A Congressionally created National Security Court restores legitimacy to the detention process
Institutional legitimacy creates reservoirs of support that strengthen the rule of law
Welsh 11 – David, J.D. from University of Utah ~"Procedural Justice Post-9/11: The Effects of Procedurally Unfair Treatment of Detainees on Perceptions of Global Legitimacy", http://law.unh.edu/assets/images/uploads/publications/unh-law-review-vol-09-no2-welsh.pdf~~cs In the context of the War on Terror, legitimacy is the critical missing element AND with the unique procedural issues created by a growing number of suspected terrorists.
Only Congress can do the plan
Lunday 8 – Kevin E., Captain and judge advocate in the U.S. Coast Guard, with Harvey Rishikof, professor of law and former chair of the Department of National Security Strategy, National War College ~Fall, "Due Process Is a Strategic Choice: Legitimacy and the Establishment of an Article III National Security Court," 39 Cal. W. Int’l L.J. 87~cs These proposals deserve careful scrutiny by the public, and particularly by the U. AND National Security Court, and addressing the most prominent criticisms of the concept.
NSC can’t and won’t be circumvented
Lunday 8 – Kevin E., Captain and judge advocate in the U.S. Coast Guard, with Harvey Rishikof, professor of law and former chair of the Department of National Security Strategy, National War College ~Fall, "Due Process Is a Strategic Choice: Legitimacy and the Establishment of an Article III National Security Court," 39 Cal. W. Int’l L.J. 87~cs The primary triggering mechanism for establishing NSC jurisdiction would fall within the discretion and control AND , it would be permitted to sua sponte transfer the case to NSC jurisdiction
NSC solves any flexibility issues
Goldsmith 9 – Jack, Henry L. Shattuck Professor at Harvard Law School ~Feb 4, "Long-Term Terrorist Detention and Our National Security Court"~cs The national security court might also replace criminal trials by military commission, courts martial AND the ordinary criminal trial processes where the government should bear ordinary burdens.45
Congress has already passed detention restrictions
Alexander 13 – Janet Cooper, law professor at Stanford ~March 21, "The Law-Free Zone and Back Again," Illinois Law Review, illinoislawreview.org/wp-content/ilr-content/articles/2013/2/Alexander.pdf-http://illinoislawreview.org/wp-content/ilr-content/articles/2013/2/Alexander.pdf~~cs Congress also passed legislation requiring suspected members of al- Qaeda or "associated forces AND custody. ¶ Thus, a decade that began with the executive branch’s assertion
of sole and exclusive power to act unconstrained by law or the other branches ended, ironically, with Congress asserting its power to countermand the executive branch’s decisions, regardless of detainee claims of legal rights, in order to maintain those law-free policies. And although the Supreme Court had blocked the Bush administration’s law-free zone strategy by upholding detainees’ habeas rights, the D.C. Circuit has since rendered those protections toothless.
11/29/13
1AC Round 5 GSU
Tournament: GSU | Round: 5 | Opponent: NYU DeDe | Judge: Fitzmier, Daniel Advantage 1 US credibility is collapsing due to detention policy Welsh 11 – David, J.D. from University of Utah “Procedural Justice Post-9/11: The Effects of Procedurally Unfair Treatment of Detainees on Perceptions of Global Legitimacy”, http://law.unh.edu/assets/images/uploads/publications/unh-law-review-vol-09-no2-welsh.pdfcs The Global War on Terror 1 has been ideologically framed as a struggle between the AND this article offers a psychological perspective of legitimacy in the context of detention. Restoring relationships with allies will be key to co’op on disease and warming Ikenberry 11 – John. G., Albert G. Milbank Professor of Politics and International Affairs at Princeton Spring, http://www.democracyjournal.org/20/a-world-of-our-making.php?page=allcs Grand Strategy as Liberal Order Building American dominance of the global system will eventually yield AND liberal order building, it can begin the process of gaining it back. Diseases cause extinction Quammen 12 – David, Science writer, columnist for Outside magazine for 15 years, worked with various other magazines 9/29, “Could the next big animal-to-human disease wipe us out?,” The Guardiancs Infectious disease is all around us. It's one of the basic processes that ecologists AND collapses? One possible factor is infectious disease, and viruses in particular. Human actions are causing a transition to runaway warming – the impact is extinction – the most up-to-date science proves Goldblatt and Watson 12 – Colin, Assistant Professor of Earth System Evolution at the School of Earth and Ocean Sciences at the University of Victoria, British Columbia, PhD from the School of Environmental Sciences at the University of East Anglia, and Andrew J., Fellow of the Royal Society, Professor at the School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, PhD from University of Reading Jan 8, Philosophical Translation of the Royal Society A, http://arxiv.org/abs/1201.1593cs The ultimate climate emergency is a “runaway greenhouse”: a hot and water vapour AND their stars are detected, some will be in a runaway greenhouse state. Warming makes oceans acidic – the impact is extinction Kristof 6 – Nicholas, New York Times, American journalist, author, op-ed columnist, and a winner of two Pulitzer Prizes Jul, “Scandal Below the Surface,” Onlinecn If you think of the earth’s surface as a great beaker, then it’s filled AND . We stand, so to speak, on the shoulders of plankton. American institutional credibility is key to heg Knowles 9 – Robert, NYU Law School Spring, “Article: American Hegemony and the Foreign Affairs Constitution”, 41 Ariz. St. L.J. 87, Lexiscs The hegemonic model also reduces the need for executive branch flexibility, and the institutional AND courts to reduce the "deference gap" between foreign and domestic cases. Lack of legitimacy makes deploying heg ineffective Mendelsohn 10 – Barak, assistant professor of political science at Haverford College and fellow at June, “The Question of International Cooperation in the War on Terrorism”, http://www.fpri.org/enotes/201006.mendelsohn.cooperationwarterror.htmlcs Going against common conceptions, I argue that the United States sought to advance more AND This process constrains the hegemon’s actions and prevents the uninhibited exercise of power. Hegemony is key to prevent global security competitions – key to solve nuclear great power wars Brooks, Ikenberry, and Wohlforth 13 – Stephen G. Brooks is Associate Professor of Government at Dartmouth, G. John Ikenberry is the Albert G. Milbank Professor of Politics and International Affairs at Princeton University in the Department of Politics and the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Global Eminence Scholar at Kyung Hee University, and William C. Wohlforth, Daniel Webster Professor in the Department of Government at Dartmouth “Don’t Come Home, America: The Case Against Retrenchment, International Security, Vol. 37, No. 3 (Winter 2012/13), pp. 7–51, http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/files/IS3703_Brooks20Wohlforth20Ikenberry.pdfgw A core premise of deep engagement is that it prevents the emergence of a far AND Moreover, switching between offshore and onshore balancing could well be dif ficult. Hegemony is key to prevent extinction and reduce structural violence Barnett 11 – Thomas, Former Senior Strategic Researcher and Professor in the Warfare Analysis and Research Department, Center for Naval Warfare Studies, U.S. Naval War College American military geostrategist and Chief Analyst at Wikistrat, worked as the Assistant for Strategic Futures in the Office of Force Transformation in the Department of Defense 3/7, http://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/articles/8099/the-new-rules-leadership-fatigue-puts-u-s-and-globalization-at-crossroadscs Events in Libya are a further reminder for Americans that we stand at a crossroads AND the 20th century, setting the stage for the Pacific Century now unfolding. Status seeking is inevitable – hegemonic deterrence is key to alter incentive structures to prevent conflict Wohlforth 9 – professor of government at Dartmouth William, “Unipolarity, Status Competition, and Great Power War,” World Affairs, January, project musegw The upshot is a near scholarly consensus that unpolarity’s consequences for great power conflict are AND inherently scarce, and competitions for status tend to be zero sum.9 Any alternative locks in the war system – an infinite number of non-falsifiable root causes mean empirics and incentive theory are the only adequate methods to understand war Moore 4 – Dir. Center for Security Law t University of Virginia, 7-time Presidential appointee, and Honorary Editor of the American Journal of International Law Solving the War Puzzle: Beyond the Democratic Peace, John Norton Moore, page 27-31.gw If major interstate war is predominantly a product of a synergy between a potential nondemocratic AND in general, happens when levels of deterrence are dramatically increased or decreased? Realism is inevitable and good Mearsheimer 1 – John J., Prof. of Political Science at U Chicago The Tragedy of Great Power Politics, pp. 1-28cn Alas, the claim that security competition and war between the great powers have been AND world as it is, not as we would like it to be. Judicial involvement is key to the credibility of detention decisions Waxman 9 – Matthew, Professor of Law and Chair of Law and National Seucirty of the Roger Hertog Program November, “Legislating the War on Terror: An Agenda for Reform”cs Judicial review can help safeguard liberty and enhance the credibility at home and abroad of AND to contest what with the assistance of counsel? Transparent determinations of what? A National Security Court restores our global image – oversight is key Sulmasy 9 – Glenn, Associate Professor of Law at the US Coast Guard Academy and National April 13, “THE NEED FOR A NATIONAL SECURITY COURT SYSTEM”cs THE WAY FORWARD¶ The President, Secretary Gates and Secretary Rice have all declared AND dedicated to the administration of justice and to upholding the rule of law. Plan The United States Congress should establish an Article III National Security Court with exclusive jurisdiction over the United States’ indefinite detention policy, specifically individuals detained pursuant to P.L. 107-40. Congress should mandate that all such individuals be expediently tried or released.
Solvency NSC solves legitimacy at home and abroad Goldsmith and Katyal 7 – Jack, Harvard law professor, was an assistant attorney general from 2003 to 2004 and Neal, Georgetown law professor, represented the plaintiff in the 2006 Supreme Court case that struck down the Guantánamo tribunals Jul 11, http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/11/opinion/11katyal.html?_r=2andadxnnl=1andoref=sloginandadxnnlx=1184158966-zBttZkBJomgptivaDrg0egcs NEARLY six years after 9/11, the government’s system for detaining terrorists without AND no such luxury. We must create sensible institutions for the long haul. NSC solves any flexibility issues Goldsmith 9 – Jack, Henry L. Shattuck Professor at Harvard Law School Feb 4, “Long-Term Terrorist Detention and Our National Security Court”cs The national security court might also replace criminal trials by military commission, courts martial AND the ordinary criminal trial processes where the government should bear ordinary burdens.45 No circumvention – the President would use the NSC Lunday 8 – Kevin E., Captain and judge advocate in the U.S. Coast Guard, with Harvey Rishikof, professor of law and former chair of the Department of National Security Strategy, National War College Fall, “Due Process Is a Strategic Choice: Legitimacy and the Establishment of an Article III National Security Court,” 39 Cal. W. Int'l L.J. 87cs The primary triggering mechanism for establishing NSC jurisdiction would fall within the discretion and control AND , it would be permitted to sua sponte transfer the case to NSC jurisdiction Congress has already passed detention restrictions Alexander 13 – Janet Cooper, law professor at Stanford March 21, "The Law-Free Zone and Back Again," Illinois Law Review, illinoislawreview.org/wp-content/ilr-content/articles/2013/2/Alexander.pdfcs Congress also passed legislation requiring suspected members of al- Qaeda or “associated forces AND , the D.C. Circuit has since rendered those protections toothless. Only Congress can do the plan Lunday 8 – Kevin E., Captain and judge advocate in the U.S. Coast Guard, with Harvey Rishikof, professor of law and former chair of the Department of National Security Strategy, National War College Fall, “Due Process Is a Strategic Choice: Legitimacy and the Establishment of an Article III National Security Court,” 39 Cal. W. Int'l L.J. 87cs These proposals deserve careful scrutiny by the public, and particularly by the U. AND National Security Court, and addressing the most prominent criticisms of the concept. There are no prior questions – empirical validity is enough basis for action – their approach is inaccurate and undermines real problem-solving Owen 2 – David, Political Theorist at the University of Southampton Jul, “Re-orienting International Relations: On Pragmatism, Pluralism and Practical Reasoning,” Millennium - Journal of International Studies; 31; 653cn Commenting on the ‘philosophical turn’ in IR, Weaver remarks that ‘a AND into the promotion of the pursuit of generality over that of empirical validity. Consequentialism is key to ethical policymaking Isaac 2 – Jeffrey, Professor of Political Science at Indiana University Spring, Dissent, vol. 49, no. 2cn Power is not a dirty word or an unfortunate feature of the world. It AND not true believers. It promotes arrogance. And it undermines political effectiveness. Reps don’t shape reality Roskoski 91 – Matthew, attorney in D.C., former Florida State University Scholar “A Linguistic and Philosophical Critique of Language ‘Arguments,” Onlinecn Language "arguments" assume the veracity of the Sapir- Whorf hypothesis. Usually AND debaters spend entire rounds quibbling over multiple interpretations of a few words.1
9/22/13
1AC Round 5 JMU
Tournament: JMU | Round: 5 | Opponent: Clarion Baker-Camloh | Judge: Meloche Same as Round 3
2/25/14
1AC Round 6 Shirley
Tournament: Shirley | Round: 6 | Opponent: Florida Frank-Prescott | Judge: White Same as Round 4
11/29/13
1AC Round 7 GSU
Tournament: GSU | Round: 7 | Opponent: Liberty BoMu | Judge: Shook, Lindsey Same as Round 1 without Disease Impact
9/22/13
1AC Round 7 Shirley
Tournament: Shirley | Round: 7 | Opponent: Harvard Herman-Xu | Judge: Woodruff Same as round 4
11/29/13
1AC West Georgia
Tournament: West Georgia University | Round: Semis | Opponent: Florida FP | Judge: Bellon, Malsin, Gramzinski
Plan
The United States Congress should establish an Article III National Security Court with exclusive jurisdiction over the United States’ indefinite detention policy, specifically individuals detained pursuant to P.L. 107-40. Congress should mandate that all such individuals be expediently tried or released.
Advantage 1
Advantage 1 is Modelling
Continued US violations of detention norms justify a world paradigm shift
Chaffee 9 – David, JD. Advocacy Counsel at Human Rights First ~42 Case W. Res. J. Int’l L. 187, "Dismantling Guantanamo: Facing the Challenges of Continued Detention and Repatriation: The Cost Of Indefinitely Kicking The Can: Why Continued "Prolonged" Detention Is No Solution To Guantanamo"~cs The most oft cited reasons by current and former government officials for closing Guantanamo is AND U.S. diplomatic power and ability to champion human rights abroad.
First, indefinite detention undermines global adherence to the Geneva Conventions
Murphy 7 – Sean, Law Professor at GWU ~"Evolving Geneva Convention Paradigms in the¶ ’War on Terrorism’: Applying the Core Rules to the¶ Release of Persons Deemed ’Unprivileged¶ Combatants’", GW Law Faculty Publications 26 Other Works~cs The general assertion that all detainees at Guantánamo Bay may be detained for the " AND soon as the reasons which necessitated his¶ internment no longer exist."143
Strong Geneva Conventions key to preventing CBW development and use
Latin American CMR sustains nuclear cooperation efforts in Brazil
Finnochio 2—Chris, Lieutenant in the US Navy ~9/2002, http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a407008.pdf~~ab V. CONCLUSION The Southern Cone developed into a democratic, civilian controlled, economically AND slowed the pace at which Brazil accepted cooperative security initiatives compared to Argentina.
Decline in nuclear coop emboldens Brazil – causes prolif
Ghoshal 13—Debalina, fellow @ the Centre for Air Power Studies ~8/20, http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/3941/nuclear-brazil~~ab By stating that submarines would be used for defensive roles only, Brazil apparently tries AND of collapsed or ineffective deterrence, easily leads to all-out war.
Advantage 2
Advantage 2 is Legitimacy
US credibility is collapsing due to detention policy
Welsh 11 – David, J.D. from University of Utah ~"Procedural Justice Post-9/11: The Effects of Procedurally Unfair Treatment of Detainees on Perceptions of Global Legitimacy", http://law.unh.edu/assets/images/uploads/publications/unh-law-review-vol-09-no2-welsh.pdf~~cs The Global War on Terror 1 has been ideologically framed as a struggle between the AND this article offers a psychological perspective of legitimacy in the context of detention.
That credibility is key to mobilize cooperation on global issues like warming and disease
Ikenberry 11 – John. G., Albert G. Milbank Professor of Politics and International Affairs at Princeton ~Spring, http://www.democracyjournal.org/20/a-world-of-our-making.php?page=all~~cs Grand Strategy as Liberal Order Building American dominance of the global system will eventually yield AND liberal order building, it can begin the process of gaining it back.
US leadership is key to bringing countries on board for international climate policy
Warming makes oceans acidic – the impact is extinction
Kristof 6 – Nicholas, New York Times, American journalist, author, op-ed columnist, and a winner of two Pulitzer Prizes ~Jul, "Scandal Below the Surface," Online~cn If you think of the earth’s surface as a great beaker, then it’s filled AND . We stand, so to speak, on the shoulders of plankton.
Globalization means unchecked disease spread causes extinction
Detention erodes the institutional credibility that supports US hegemony
Knowles 9 – Robert, NYU Law School ~Spring, "Article: American Hegemony and the Foreign Affairs Constitution", 41 Ariz. St. L.J. 87, Lexis~cs The hegemonic model also reduces the need for executive branch flexibility, and the institutional AND courts to reduce the "deference gap" between foreign and domestic cases.
Material power’s irrelevant – lack of legitimacy makes heg ineffective
Mendelsohn 10 – Barak, assistant professor of political science at Haverford College and fellow at June, "The Question of International Cooperation in the War on Terrorism", http://www.fpri.org/enotes/201006.mendelsohn.cooperationwarterror.html~~cs Going against common conceptions, I argue that the United States sought to advance more AND This process constrains the hegemon’s actions and prevents the uninhibited exercise of power.
Hegemony is key to prevent global security competitions – key to solve nuclear great power wars
Brooks, Ikenberry, and Wohlforth 13 – Stephen G. Brooks is Associate Professor of Government at Dartmouth, G. John Ikenberry is the Albert G. Milbank Professor of Politics and International Affairs at Princeton University in the Department of Politics and the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Global Eminence Scholar at Kyung Hee University, and William C. Wohlforth, Daniel Webster Professor in the Department of Government at Dartmouth ~"Don’t Come Home, America: The Case Against Retrenchment, International Security, Vol. 37, No. 3 (Winter 2012/13), pp. 7–51, http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/files/IS3703_Brooks20Wohlforth20Ikenberry.pdf~~gw A core premise of deep engagement is that it prevents the emergence of a far AND Moreover, switching between offshore and onshore balancing could well be dif ficult.
Solvency
An Article III National Security Court restores our global image
Sulmasy 9 – Glenn, Associate Professor of Law at the US Coast Guard Academy and National ~April 13, "THE NEED FOR A NATIONAL SECURITY COURT SYSTEM"~cs THE WAY FORWARD¶ The President, Secretary Gates and Secretary Rice have all declared AND dedicated to the administration of justice and to upholding the rule of law.
Institutional legitimacy creates reservoirs of support that strengthen the rule of law
Welsh 11 – David, J.D. from University of Utah ~"Procedural Justice Post-9/11: The Effects of Procedurally Unfair Treatment of Detainees on Perceptions of Global Legitimacy", http://law.unh.edu/assets/images/uploads/publications/unh-law-review-vol-09-no2-welsh.pdf~~cs In the context of the War on Terror, legitimacy is the critical missing element AND with the unique procedural issues created by a growing number of suspected terrorists.
NSC can’t and won’t be circumvented
Lunday 8 – Kevin E., Captain and judge advocate in the U.S. Coast Guard, with Harvey Rishikof, professor of law and former chair of the Department of National Security Strategy, National War College ~Fall, "Due Process Is a Strategic Choice: Legitimacy and the Establishment of an Article III National Security Court," 39 Cal. W. Int’l L.J. 87~cs The primary triggering mechanism for establishing NSC jurisdiction would fall within the discretion and control AND , it would be permitted to sua sponte transfer the case to NSC jurisdiction
Only Congress can do the plan
Lunday 8 – Kevin E., Captain and judge advocate in the U.S. Coast Guard, with Harvey Rishikof, professor of law and former chair of the Department of National Security Strategy, National War College ~Fall, "Due Process Is a Strategic Choice: Legitimacy and the Establishment of an Article III National Security Court," 39 Cal. W. Int’l L.J. 87~cs These proposals deserve careful scrutiny by the public, and particularly by the U. AND National Security Court, and addressing the most prominent criticisms of the concept.
Just released detainees from Gitmo – DAs are n/u
Rosenberg 1/2 ~Carol Rosenberg - The Miami Herald/McClatchy-Tribune, Guantanamo releases picked up as 2013 drew to a close, Corpus Christi Caller-Times, Janaury 2, 2014joe) In rapid succession, the U.S. in December sent Guantanamo prisoners home AND -by-case basis, fashioning specific solutions for each individual captive.
1/20/14
1ac NDT Rnd 1
Tournament: NDT | Round: 1 | Opponent: Missouri State BR | Judge: Decker, Struth, Watson Plan Plan: United States federal judiciary should substantially increase judicial restrictions on the President’s authority to introduce armed forces into hostilities by holding that policies that allow the United States to launch a retaliatory nuclear attack before a nuclear detonation in the United States are unconstitutional under the Posterity Clause because these policies represent an unacceptable risk of irreversible damage to the rights of future generations. Miscalc – 1AC Advantage 1 is Miscalculation: Miscalc is the only scenario for nuclear war Evans 10 – Gareth, President and Chief Executive of the Brussels-based International Crisis Group, Report of the International Commission on Nuclear Non-proliferation and Disarmament “ELIMINATING NUCLEAR THREATS,” ICNND, Onlinecn Maintaining thousands of nuclear warheads on dangerously high launch on warning alert is the ultimate AND maker miscalculation should to an important degree be attributed to sheer luck.'
And it’s inevitable: First, early warning glitches and human error Phillips and Starr 4 – Alan, M.D., Cambridge physicist, radar researcher during WW2 , and Steven, nuclear engineer, medical technologist May/Jun, “Let’s go No-LOW,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Vol 60: No 3cn As long as the United States and Russia retain their arsenals of nuclear-armed AND systems may not only cease to provide redundancy—it may amplify mistakes. Second, overlapping false alarms Sennott 1 – Linn, Ph.D., Professor of Mathematics, Illinois State University http://www-ee.stanford.edu/~hellman/Breakthrough/book/chapters/sennott.htmlcn Data made available by the American government under its Freedom of Information Act show that AND false alarm rates are one hundred per year for both satellites and radars. Third, short decision-making times Barrett 13 – Anthony, PhD in Engineering and Public Policy from Carnegie Mellon University AND BS in Political Science from Columbia and Research Assistant at Global Catastrophic Risk Institute June 28, Analyzing and Reducing the Risks of Inadvertent Nuclear War Between the United States and Russiacs Attack indicators may or may not be resolved (identified as a false alarm) AND error-prone LOW posture during periods of high tensions or crisis.34 And fourth, deliberate cyber-attacks on early warning systems Fritz 9 – Jason, radar signaling specialist, International Commission on Nuclear Nonproliferation and Disarmament Jul 30, http://www.ifap.ru/pr/2009/n090730a.pdfcn The US nuclear arsenal remains designed for the Cold War. This means its paramount AND in order to issue false voice commands (Andersen 2001, Chapter 16). Miscalc sparks US-Russia war and causes extinction ----Weather, computer chips, wild animals, training tapes, intentional manipulation Barrett 13 – Anthony, PhD in Engineering and Public Policy from Carnegie Mellon University AND BS in Political Science from Columbia and Research Assistant at Global Catastrophic Risk Institute June 28, Analyzing and Reducing the Risks of Inadvertent Nuclear War Between the United States and Russiacs War involving significant fractions of the U.S. and Russian nuclear arsenals, AND making one or both nations more likely to misinterpret events as attacks. 16 Russia’s war plans ensures they’ll retaliate Thompson 9 – Nicholas, senior editor of Wired Sept 21, “Inside the Apocalyptic Soviet Doomsday Machine,” Wiredcn "The Perimeter system is very, very nice," he says. "We AND . After all, he says, Dead Hand is continuously being upgraded. The past is not predictive – close calls prove the risk of accidental war is high Sagan 93 – Scott, professor of political science and co-director of the Center for International Security and Cooperation “The limits of safety: Organizations, accidents, and nuclear weapons” pp. 11-12cn One possibility is to assume that this central fact proves that the danger of nuclear AND —even an apparently perfect final safety record may not inspire extreme confidence. India and Pakistan model the U.S. Mian 2 – Zia, Physicist at Princeton and Frank Hippel, Professor o
3/28/14
1ar NDT Rnd 1
Tournament: NDT | Round: 1 | Opponent: Missouri State BR | Judge: Decker, Struth, Watson Inherency – Yes LoW – A2: Ford Ev. Yes LoW – Ford reversed his position on this Starr 9 – Steven, senior scientist with Physicians for Social Responsibility; Director of Clinical Laboratory Science Program, University of Missouri-Columbia; Areas of Expertise: Nuclear proliferation, Risk of nuclear war causing acute climate change, Taking nuclear weapons off high-alert status Nov 19, http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474977908996cn We ran into the Bush administration, in 2007, announcing that the US did not have and had never had weapons on "hair-trigger" alert, and that they would have to put them on "hair-trigger alert" in order to de-alert them. I sent this to Blair and he wrote a rebuttal to this (see http://lcnp.org/disarmament/opstatus-blair.htm ) . Those designing this specious argument had settled on the term "hair-trigger alert" in order to create a semantic debate and avoid real debate of the genuine high-alert issue. I wound up writing an article on definitions (see http://www.wagingpeace.org/articles/2007/11/29_starr_explanation_terminology.php ), but am actually still working on the problem . . . I have a new article which I will send to you soon on definitions, they are still a big problem . . . In Oct 2008, I had a debate with Christopher Ford, who at that time had retired from being the US Special Rep for Nuclear Non-proliferation (they wouldn't let me record it, unfortunately) at the International Peace Institute. Ford, in this private setting, actually admitted that the US had a LOW capability (see my definitions) which was quite a switch from the previous US stance, but claimed that the US and Russia had an "understanding" that neither one would ever use LOW. I found this ludicrous, and asked since when did diplomats act on intentions rather than capabilities. I heard grunts of agreement. So . . . to be clear about this you will need to define these terms carefully and understand that RLOAD is a policy decision, but in reality the only way to actually prevent LOW is to eliminate the capability to LOW by extending the time required to launch beyond the minimal flight times of the missiles (12 to 30 minutes). Miscalc – Impact – A2: Missileers’ Consciences Solve Under LoW, someone will eventually “push the button” Hallam 10 – John, Nuclear Weapons Campaigner PND Nuclear Flashpoints, Co-Author and Co-Coordinator of the Appeal on Nuclear Weapons Operating Status from 44 Nobel Prizewinners and 362 NGOs Jan 2, http://www.pndnsw.org.au/articles/features/107-taking-the-apocalypse-off-the-agenda-presentation-to-south-asia-foundation.htmlcn James Low in his 1999 thesis already discussed, seems to suggest that we can AND an accidental nuclear war caused by faulty or misinterpreted Early Warning System data". Missileers would execute lawful orders and are still stuck in the Cold War/deterrence framework Hodge 8 – Nathan, writer for Jane’s Defence Weekly, and frequent contributor to Slate Aug, http://www.thebulletin.org/files/064003005.pdfcn Other small, yet not insignificant, changes have taken place in the world of AND . The same kind of rationale is instilled in the crews about deterrence.” Miscalc – Yes Miscalc – A2: De-Targeting Solves De-targeting doesn’t prevent us from launching on warning Slocombe 8 – Walter, Attorney; Former Under Secretary of Defense for Policy http://www.ewi.info/system/files/Slocombe.pdfcn De?targeting does not, however, obviate a ‘launch under attack” (LUA) policy because the de?targeting arrangements are deliberately designed so that targets can be inserted into the force sufficiently rapidly enough to make LUA feasible. Nukes are still armed, fueled, and targeted at all times Mintz 5 – Morton, investigative journalist and reporter for over 60 years Jun, http://oztaboo.com/givepeaceachance/peace2.htmlcn The cold war is long over, and the United States and Russia are at AND will send the messages on receipt of a single computer-delivered command. A2: ICJ CP – 1AR No Solvency U.S. won’t implement the decision: Mexico suits prove Bellinger 9 – John B., former legal adviser to the State Department http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/new-voices-former-state-department-official-urges-president-implement-ruling-world-court rw PRESIDENT OBAMA has rightly emphasized America's commitment to complying with international law. It is AND , and ordered us to reconsider all of the convictions and death sentences. US leadership is key to solve warming – the CP doesn’t eliminate first mover advantages Shine 12 – Connor, Las Vegas Sun quoting a report from the Brookings Institute Nov 14, Expert: International solution to climate change hinges on U.S. leadership. http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2012/nov/14/expert-international-solution-climate-change-hinge/cs Despite repeated attempts over the past decades to create a plan to curb carbon emissions AND to regulating carbon emissions could have negative effects on economic competitiveness and trade. SCS/ECS – 1NC No SCS or ECS conflict Gupta 11 – Rukmani, Associate Fellow @ the Institute for Defense Studies and Analyses 10/23/11, “South China Sea Conflict? No Way”, the-diplomat.com/2011/10/23/south-china-sea-conflict-no-way/job Despite what opinion pieces in the Global Times may say, there’s reason to suspect AND seen as attempts to exaggerate claims so as to secure a better negotiating stance Won’t escalate or go nuclear Park 12 – Sungtae, Security Policy Studies at GWU, Also written articles for the CSIS “Limits of China-Japan Tension Over the Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands”gw There are also logistical reasons why a war over the Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands is AND it would turn into a general war or escalate to a nuclear conflict.
3/28/14
2AC Octas JMU
Tournament: JMU | Round: Octas | Opponent: James Madison Lepp-Miller | Judge: Struth, Susko, Watson
Even a depression would not affect heg – military fundamentals outweigh, and challengers suffer more
Kagan 12 – Robert, Professor of Law, Professor Emeritus of Political Science, Professor in the Graduate School at UC-Berkeley; fellow at the Brookings Institute; expert and frequent commentator on Egypt, the Middle East, U.S. national security, and U.S.-European relations ~Jan 18, http://w w w .tnr.com/article/politics/magazine/99521/america-world-power-declinism?passthru=ZDkyNzQzZTk3YWY3YzE0OWM5MGRiZmIw NGQw NDBiZmI~cn SOME OF THE ARGUMENTS for America’s relative decline these days would be more potent if AND behind both the United States and Europe in terms of per capita GDP.
A2: Executive CP – 2AC Frontline
Solvency ev is terrible – just an ad hom on Obama that says he’s weak-kneed on Guantanamo – if they read new solvency card we get new args in 1AR
Perm: Do Both
Perm: Do the CP – CPs should compete BOTH functionally and textually – key to check CPs that steal 100 of the aff
Executive detention schemes fail
Pearlstein 9 – Deborah N., lecturer in public and international affairs, Woodrow Wilson School of Public 26 International Affairs ~July, "Form and Function in the National Security Constitution," Connecticut Law Review, 41 Conn. L. Rev. 1549~cs A. Unitary Executive Detention¶ In theory, a detention scheme involving only the AND that help to mitigate errors associated with "emergency" decision- making.
Congress key to democratic legitimacy and preventing future vacillation in executive policy
Wittes 9 – Benjamin, senior fellow and research director in public law at the Brookings Institution, Stuart Taylor, an American journalist, graduated from Princeton University and Harvard Law School ~"Legislating the War on Terror: An Agenda for Reform", November 3, Book, p. 329-330~gw While President Obama’s policy makes a clean break with the Bush record, it actually AND past without giving up what the United States will need in the future.
Only Congress can create an NSC
Future presidents prevent solvency
Harvard Law Review 12 "Developments in the Law: Presidential Authority," Vol. 125:2057, www.harvardlawreview.org/media/pdf/vol125_devo.pdf The recent history of signing statements demonstrates how public opinion can effectively check presidential expansions AND practices. 147 Only time, and perhaps public opinion, will tell.
Agent PICs are a voting issue – steal the entire plan function, trade off with substantive debates, are infinitely regressive, and aren’t well-grounded in the literature
Court will roll back the CP
Cooper 2 – Phillip, Professor of Public Administration @ Portland State University ~By Order of the President: The Use and Abuse of Executive Direct Action" pg..77~cn Despite the apparent deference by the judiciary to the president’s orders, this chapter has AND the validity of orders and with addressing the consequences of admittedly legitimate decrees.
All the args on the Afghan DA apply – no reason why president is key
Focus on president is wrong
Jonathan Mercer 8/28, 2013, associate professor of political science at the University of Washington in Seattle and a Fellow at the Center for International Studies at the London School of Economics. Bad Reputation, 28 August 2013, www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/139376/jonathan-mercer/bad-reputation Even if Assad were so simpleminded, the administration’s critics are wrong to suggest that AND suicide out of fear that others might later wrongly think one is dead. It is also possible that the United States did not factor into Assad’s calculations. AND , if overthrowing Assad were easy, it would already have been done. Instead of worrying about U.S. credibility or the president’s reputation, the administration should focus on what can be done to reinforce the longstanding norm against the use of weapons of mass destruction.
Transfers are irrelevant
Rayner 13 – Martha, associate clinical professor of law at Fordham University School of Law ~May 7, "Obama’s Prisoners at Guantanamo" WSJ~cs Mr. Obama’s statements at his April 30 press conference displayed this detachment in a AND or acknowledge that he has the power to end indefinite detention without trial.
A2: Afghan DA
UQ from 2008 – laughable – 1AC ev proves restrictions now – never cause impact
Great powers won’t intervene in Central Asia – it’s a low priority
Weitz 6 – Senior Fellow and Associate Director of Center for Future Security Strategies at Hudson Institute ~Richard, "Averting a New Great Game in Central Asia," Washington Quarterly, Summer, http://www.c4ads.org/files/weitz_twq_summer06_centasia.pdf~~ Fortunately, the fact that Central Asia does not represent the most important geographic region AND overtly competitive policies could undermine these opportunities for cooperation and should be avoided.
No evidence Afghan stability will spillover
Walt 11 – Stephen, professor of international affairs at Harvard University’s John F. Kennedy School of Government January/February, Foreign Policy, "Where Do Bad Ideas Come From?" *empirically denied by Vietnam *no scholarly ev. to establish domino theory is true Yet this sadly turns out to be no universal law: There is no inexorable AND single setback in a strategic backwater will unleash a cascade of falling dominoes.
Syria should have triggered DA
Cordseman 13 – Anthony, Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) in Washington, D.C. ~9/1, "President Obama and Syria: The ’Waiting for Godot’ Strategy," http://csis.org/publication/president-obama-and-syria-waiting-godot-strategy~~cs Instead, the Administration first rushed into the kind of rhetoric you only use if AND to return for its holiday. The message to the world is obvious.
Oversight doesn’t cut it – other factors outweigh
Holmes 9 – Stephen, Walter E. Meyer Professor of Law, New York University School of Law ~"The Brennan Center Jorde Symposium on Constitutional Law: In Case of Emergency: Misunderstanding Tradeoffs in the War on Terror", April, California Law Review, 97 Calif. L. Rev. 301, Lexis~cs Even if the promoters of unfettered executive power were justified in associating legal rules with AND is the fruit of wishful thinking is the least that might be said.
No link – NSC preserves enough executive power
McCarthy and Velshi 9 – Andrew, Director of the Center for Law 26 Counterterrorism at the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies and Alykhan, attorney at the Center for Law 26 Counterterrorism ~Aug. 20, "Outsourcing American Law," AEI Working Paper, http://www.aei.org/files/2009/08/20/20090820-Chapter6.pdf~~cs What is an asset in the criminal justice system, however, would be a AND be at liberty to create new entitlements by analogizing to ordinary criminal proceedings.
Afghan stability causes Central Asian democracy—it’s a key model.
Peter Bergen, Senior Fellow at the New America Foundation and adjunct professor at the School of Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins, Testimony before the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, 2-15-2007 (http://foreignaffairs.house.gov/110/ber021507.htm)
It is also time for the United States to institute a long-term mini AND and the Central Asian republics, none of which are truly democratic states.
Central Asian democracy causes Uighur secessionism, which will destroy China’s economy.
Many Uighurs view the Chinese as colonizers, and this is bound to lead to AND Xinjiang with consequences for the Chinese economy as well as the Uighur’s themselves.
Domestic weakness forces China to war to save face
’In the past, a weak China, beset by social disorder, inflation and AND economic power with a commensurate amount of military power will be the key. It is commonly asserted that national leaders who are unable to overcome domestic difficulties sometimes AND more unpredictable and dangerous than a strong, confident and cohesive China.’27 There are already signs of unrest and secessionist movements in China, and if China AND Xinjiang Province and the banned Falungong cult under control are some urgent tasks.
U.S.-China war draws in every other nuclear power – that causes extinction
Straits Times 2k ~Jun 25, LEXIS~cn THE high-intensity scenario postulates a cross-strait war escalating into a full AND cannot be ruled out entirely, for China puts sovereignty above everything else.
2AC – Debt Ceiling
No econ impact
Jervis 11 – Robert, Professor in the Department of Political Science and School of International and Public Affairs at Columbia ~Dec, "Force in Our Times," Survival, Vol. 25, No. 4, p. 403-425~cs Even if war is still seen as evil, the security community could be dissolved AND times bring about greater economic conflict, it will not make war thinkable.
Yellen thumps—Congress wants to know the Fed’s bond-buying status before deciding the debt ceiling
Fiat solves the link – the plan just IS, and Congress like it; the Disad is a "would" question
Winners win
Marshall 11 – Bryan W, Miami University and Brandon C. Prins, Howard H. Baker, Jr. Center for Public Policy ~2011, "Power or Posturing? Policy Availability and Congressional Influence on U.S. Presidential Decisions to Use Force", Sept, Presidential Studies Quarterly 41, no. 3~cs Presidents rely heavily on Congress in converting their political capital into real policy success. AND made with an eye toward managing political capital at home (Fordham 2002).
Framework – 2AC
The role of the ballot is to determine whether hypothetical implementation of the plan is superior to a competitive, reciprocal alternative or the status quo.
1) Ground – non-resolutional frameworks are unpredictable, self-serving, and moot the 1AC
2) Education – they disincentivize topic-specific research and clash, and preclude important discussions about the details of policy
And, aff choice solves their offense
K proper
C
Perm do the plan and all non-con
Perm: Addressing potential abuse of power by the state, as articulated by the aff, should be addressed along with other issues. Giroux would advocate looking at general and particular issues together.
Giroux 2013 (Henry A. Giroux, Professor at McMaster University in the English and Cultural Studies Department and a Distinguished Visiting Professorship at Ryerson University. The Violence of Organized Forgetting, Truthout | Op-Ed. Monday, 22 July 2013 00:00, http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/17647-the-violence-of-organized-forgetting) Marginalized youth, workers, artists and others are raising serious questions about the violence AND movements for solidarity, and alternative conceptions of politics, democracy and justice. All of these issues are important, but what must be addressed in the most AND ~ under carceral supervision - more than were in Stalin’s Gulag."~22~ While there has been considerable coverage in the progressive media given to the violence that AND the social state and the corresponding rise of the warfare and punishing state.
Scenario planning is inevitable – better to use it calmly now than irrationally during a real emergency
Ogilvy 3 – James, author; cofounded Global Business Network ~"What Strategists Can Learn from Sartre," http://www.gbn.com/articles/pdfs/Strategists20and20Sartre.pdf~~cn Such punctuations call for strategies developed prior to the moment of urgency. And as AND prefer. (See "How Scenario Planning Explains Uncertainty," page 5.)
Scenario planning with extinction impact scenarios spurs people to create solutions to prevent extinction – empirically proven
Terdiman 8 – Daniel, writer for CNET News ~Oct 28, http://news.cnet.com/8301-13772_3-10076796-52.html~~cn If you knew the human race was facing imminent extinction, what would you do AND "It was serious, and reflects what people are thinking about today."
Violence is declining
Pinker 11 – Steven, professor of psychology at Harvard, ~The Better Angels of our Nature, October, google books~cs This book is about what may be the most important thing that has ever happened AND terms of psychology and history: how human minds deal with changing circumstances.
Unless we overcome society’s current aversion to debating existential risks, extinction really is inevitable
Bostrom 2 – Nick, Ph.D., Department of Philosophy, Yale University ~"Existential risks: analyzing human extinction scenarios and related hazards" http://www.transhumanist.com/volume9/risks.pdf~~cn Because of accelerating technological progress, humankind may be rapidly approaching a critical phase in AND time and resources to benefiting humankind via global safety compared to other philanthropies.
"Root cause" isn’t offense – we still solve the short-term proximate causes
And, "root cause" arguments are inaccurate and dangerous – combining strategies is key
Martin 90 – Brian, Professor at the University of Wollongong ~Uprooting War, http://www.uow.edu.au/arts/sts/bmartin/pubs/90uw/index.html~~cn War does not have a single root In this chapter and in the six preceding AND the roots of war and developing strategies for grassroots movements to uproot them.
2/25/14
2AC Quarters JMU
Tournament: JMU | Round: Quarters | Opponent: George Washington Nelson-Salathe | Judge: Brass, Garrett, Koch
T
W/M – We prohibit INDEFINITE DETENTION – detention with a sentence is detention
C/I – Restrict Does not
Prohibit/Destroy – this ev is comparative==== Words 26 Phrases ’4 ~Words 26 Phrases, Vol. 37A, 2004, p. 405.~(NSB) Miss. 1927. To "restrict" is to restrain within bounds; to limit; to confine, and does not mean to destroy or prohibit.-Dart v. City of Gulfport, 113 So. 441, 147 Miss. 534
They OVERlimit – courts are the heart of literature
PLAN TEXT SOLVES – IGNORE SECOND SENTENCE – TRIED OR RELEASE – THAT’S PROHIBITION OF INDEFINITE DETENTION
We solve their GITMO ev – Those people would be released immediately
No ground loss – we can’t be bidirectional
Extra-T is not a voting issue:
1) Increases NEG ground through DA links
2) They can always CP out or simply sever extra-topical parts
3) Increases policy analysis and education – every plan includes some extra topical part
4) At worst, reject the extra-T parts of the plan, not the team
Adv 1
Geneva convention V is irrelevant – 1AC Murphy isolates conventions III and IV as crucial IL – we solve those "shall be released by the Detaining Power as soon as the reasons which necessitated his¶ internment no longer exist."
Nations perceive I-law as working – communication ensures that is sufficient
Plan text solves their bad court args – even if they WANT to revert to old policies, they can’t since we stipulate detainees MUST be tried or released
Congressional oversight ensures criminal law is followed – Article III NSC is distinct from what their cards assume, which is article I courts
Goldsmith 9 – Jack, Henry L. Shattuck Professor at Harvard Law School ~Feb 4, "Long-Term Terrorist Detention and Our National Security Court"~cs The national security court might also replace criminal trials by military commission, courts martial AND the ordinary criminal trial processes where the government should bear ordinary burdens.45
Only a specialized court system restores credibility – we still solve our advantages
Waxman 9 – Matthew, Professor of Law and Faculty Chair at the Roger Hertog Program on Law and National Security ~Nov 3, "Legislating the War on Terror: An Agenda for Reform"~cs Judicial review can help safeguard liberty and enhance the credibility at home and abroad of AND to contest what with the assistance of counsel? Transparent determinations of what?
Other
A2: Executive CP – 2AC Frontline
Perm: Do Both
Perm: Do the CP – CPs should compete BOTH functionally and textually – key to check CPs that steal 100 of the aff
XO puts a personal stamp on a policy which causes blame to fall on the President
Rodgers 1 – Professor of Law, University of Washington ~Journal of Land, Resources, 26 Environmental Law, LEXIS~cn The downside of the executive order’s capacity for decisive declaration is that it offers a AND that was the motivation for President Nixon’s National Industrial Pollution Control Council. 37
Executive detention schemes fail
Pearlstein 9 – Deborah N., lecturer in public and international affairs, Woodrow Wilson School of Public 26 International Affairs ~July, "Form and Function in the National Security Constitution," Connecticut Law Review, 41 Conn. L. Rev. 1549~cs A. Unitary Executive Detention¶ In theory, a detention scheme involving only the AND that help to mitigate errors associated with "emergency" decision- making.
Congress key to democratic legitimacy and preventing future vacillation in executive policy
Wittes 9 – Benjamin, senior fellow and research director in public law at the Brookings Institution, Stuart Taylor, an American journalist, graduated from Princeton University and Harvard Law School ~"Legislating the War on Terror: An Agenda for Reform", November 3, Book, p. 329-330~gw While President Obama’s policy makes a clean break with the Bush record, it actually AND past without giving up what the United States will need in the future.
Only Congress can create an NSC
NSCs are key – only trials in federal courts give the process legitimacy – that’s (*)
Future presidents prevent solvency
Harvard Law Review 12 "Developments in the Law: Presidential Authority," Vol. 125:2057, www.harvardlawreview.org/media/pdf/vol125_devo.pdf The recent history of signing statements demonstrates how public opinion can effectively check presidential expansions AND practices. 147 Only time, and perhaps public opinion, will tell.
Agent PICs are a voting issue – steal the entire plan function, trade off with substantive debates, are infinitely regressive, and aren’t well-grounded in the literature
Court will roll back the CP
Cooper 2 – Phillip, Professor of Public Administration @ Portland State University ~By Order of the President: The Use and Abuse of Executive Direct Action" pg..77~cn Despite the apparent deference by the judiciary to the president’s orders, this chapter has AND the validity of orders and with addressing the consequences of admittedly legitimate decrees.
PTX DA
No econ impact
Jervis 11 – Robert, Professor in the Department of Political Science and School of International and Public Affairs at Columbia ~Dec, "Force in Our Times," Survival, Vol. 25, No. 4, p. 403-425~cs Even if war is still seen as evil, the security community could be dissolved AND times bring about greater economic conflict, it will not make war thinkable.
Yellen thumps and will cause fights—Congress wants to know the Fed’s bond-buying status before deciding the debt ceiling
Congress just passed limitations of indefinite detention—non uniques the DA
Alexander 13—Janet, law prof @ Stanford ~3/21, illinoislawreview.org/wp-content/ilr-content/articles/2013/2/Alexander.pdf~ab Congress also passed legislation requiring suspected members of al- Qaeda or "associated forces AND , the D.C. Circuit has since rendered those protections toothless.
Fiat solves the link – the plan just IS, and Congress like it; the Disad is a "would" question
Winners win
Marshall 11 – Bryan W, Miami University and Brandon C. Prins, Howard H. Baker, Jr. Center for Public Policy ~2011, "Power or Posturing? Policy Availability and Congressional Influence on U.S. Presidential Decisions to Use Force", Sept, Presidential Studies Quarterly 41, no. 3~cs Presidents rely heavily on Congress in converting their political capital into real policy success. AND made with an eye toward managing political capital at home (Fordham 2002).
A2: Targeted Killing Trade-Off DA – 2AC
No risk of drone wars
Joseph Singh 12, researcher at the Center for a New American Security, 8/13/12, "Betting Against a Drone Arms Race," http://nation.time.com/2012/08/13/betting-against-a-drone-arms-race/~~23ixzz2eSvaZnfQ In short, the doomsday drone scenario Ignatieff and Sharkey predict results from an excessive focus on rapidly-evolving military technology. Instead, we must return to what we know about state behavior in an anarchistic international order. Nations will confront the same principles of deterrence, for example, when deciding to launch a targeted killing operation regardless of whether they conduct it through a drone or a covert amphibious assault team. Drones may make waging war more domestically palatable, but they don’t change the very serious risks of retaliation for an attacking state. Any state otherwise deterred from using force abroad will not significantly increase its power projection on account of acquiring drones. What’s more, the very states whose use of drones could threaten U.S. security – countries like China – are not democratic, which means that the possible political ramifications of the low risk of casualties resulting from drone use are irrelevant. For all their military benefits, putting drones into play requires an ability to meet the political and security risks associated with their use. Despite these realities, there remain a host of defensible arguments one could employ to discredit the Obama drone strategy. The legal justification for targeted killings in areas not internationally recognized as war zones is uncertain at best. Further, the short-term gains yielded by targeted killing operations in Pakistan, Somalia and Yemen, while debilitating to Al Qaeda leadership in the short-term, may serve to destroy already tenacious bilateral relations in the region and radicalize local populations. Yet, the past decade’s experience with drones bears no evidence of impending instability in the global strategic landscape. Conflict may not be any less likely in the era of drones, but the nature of 21st Century warfare remains fundamentally unaltered despite their arrival in large numbers.
Dramatic shift to drones in the SQuo
Lefkowitz 13 – Jay, senior lawyer and former domestic policy advisor to President George W. ~Mar 4, Financial Times, "Drones are no substitute for detention," www.ft.com/cms/s/0/dae6552c-84c2-11e2-891d-00144feabdc0.html~23axzz2dZnIVyqb~cs Memo to all those critics of Guantánamo Bay: beware what you wish for. AND promptly administered through military courts – instead of taking the easy way out.
No drone shift link – too many external factors
Chesney 11 – Robert, Charles I. Francis Professor in Law at the UT School of Law as well as a non-resident Senior Fellow at Brookings ~Oct 17, "Examining the Evidence of a Detention-Drone Strike Tradeoff," www.lawfareblog.com/2011/10/examining-the-evidence-of-a-detention-drone-strike-tradeoff/~cs Yesterday Jack linked to this piece by Noah Feldman, which among other things advances AND detention versus targeting, but something much more complex and difficult to measure.
Turn – an easy path to legal detention solves the shift
Whitlock 13 – Craig, Washington Post ~Jan 1, "Renditions continue under Obama, despite due-process concerns," articles.washingtonpost.com/2013-01-01/world/36323571_1_obama-administration-interrogation-drone-strikes~cs The three European men with Somali roots were arrested on a murky pretext in August AND Renditions, though controversial and complex, represent one of the few alternatives.
No causal link between U.S. drone preferences and others – weaponization is easy and inevitable if they want it
The role of the ballot is to determine whether hypothetical implementation of the plan is superior to a competitive, reciprocal alternative or the status quo.
1) Ground – non-resolutional frameworks are unpredictable, self-serving, and moot the 1AC
2) Education – they disincentivize topic-specific research and clash, and preclude important discussions about the details of policy
And, aff choice solves their offense
LBL
Method is not first – their approach causes useless paradigm wars
Wendt 98 – Alexander, 3rd Most Influential Scholar of IR in the World According to Survey of 1084 IR Scholars ~"On Constitution and Causation in International Relations," British International Studies Association~cn As a community, we in the academic study of international politics spend too much AND sparring over epistemology is often one-sided, intolerant caricatures of science.
And, their internal links assume people with political power – but, reps are inherently open, and only our use can uniquely reclaim them
Oscarson 3 – Christopher, with Anna Kurtz; National Council of Teachers ~"BookTalk: Revising the Discourse of Hate," ProQuest~cn However, Butler also argues that the daily, repeated use of words owns a AND might be able to create spaces for learning in which everyone feels safe.
Violence is declining
Pinker 11 – Steven, professor of psychology at Harvard, ~The Better Angels of our Nature, October, google books~cs This book is about what may be the most important thing that has ever happened AND terms of psychology and history: how human minds deal with changing circumstances.
And, "root cause" arguments are inaccurate and dangerous – combining strategies is key
Martin 90 – Brian, Professor at the University of Wollongong ~Uprooting War, http://www.uow.edu.au/arts/sts/bmartin/pubs/90uw/index.html~~cn War does not have a single root In this chapter and in the six preceding AND the roots of war and developing strategies for grassroots movements to uproot them.
Consequentialism is key to ethical policymaking
Isaac 2 – Jeffrey, Professor of Political Science at Indiana University ~Spring, Dissent, vol. 49, no. 2~cn Power is not a dirty word or an unfortunate feature of the world. It AND not true believers. It promotes arrogance. And it undermines political effectiveness.
Liberal economic policies prevent war, imperialism, and otherization
Griswold 98 – Daniel T., associate director of the Center for Trade Policy Studies at the CATO Institute ~Dec 31, http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=5759~~cn Advocates of free trade have long argued that its benefits are not merely economic. AND
that no two nations with McDonald’s franchises have ever gone to war.
Aff outweighs:
EITHER they have no brink because the ills of neoliberalism have existed for decades, OR they do and the alt would take too long to solve anyway
We control uniqueness – free market growth solves global poverty and inequality
Frieden 10 – Jeffrey, Professor of Government at Harvard; researches international monetary and financial relations ~Mar 6, http://www.hceronline.com/?q=node/48~~cn The good news about global inequality is that it has been declining. The world AND of broad and deep global markets for goods, capital, and technology.
Neolib reforms key to space – only way to prevent terminal extinction
The ALT only rejects the plan – that doesn’t spillover
And, they can’t wish away neoliberalism – reciprocal fiat power is key to our ability to generate offense
Prosperity makes free market reforms inevitable – and human adaptation solves the bad aspects
Ringmar 5 – Erik, Ph.D., professor of Social and Cultural Studies at the National Chiao Tung University, Taiwan ~Surviving Capitalism: How We Learned to Live with the Market and Remained Almost Human, pp. 4-5~cn And now we are thus invited to do it all over again. We should AND a right that we cannot sell, even if we wanted to.9
Tech means globalization and decentralization are inevitable
Perm: Do the plan and all parts of the alternative that don’t explicitly reject it
If the alt solves the status quo, it can overcome any residual link to the plan
Identifying and working to solve the flaws of the neolib market without wholesale rejection is best for alleviating harm
Norberg 3 – Johan, M.A., fellow at the Swedish think tank Timbro, and senior fellow at the CATO Institute ~In Defense of Global Capitalism, pg. 98~cn Capitalism is not a perfect system, and it is not good for everyone all AND world around us, to suggest that another system could do as well?
2/25/14
2AC Round 1 GSU
Tournament: GSU | Round: 1 | Opponent: Iowa CrSh | Judge: Donlan, Nick Leadership Tipping point isn’t until 2050 Lemonick 12 – Michael, Professor at Princeton, Senior staff writer of Climate Central, TIME science, and Discovery magazine, educated at Harvard, author of multiple books on astrophysics Aug 2, http://www.climatespectator.com.au/commentary/how-long-climate-change-tipping-pointcs Climate change is a serious enough problem, but it could be a lot worse AND , “that we can cut back on fossil fuel emissions before that.” Adaptability arguments don’t assume the rapid rate of current anthropogenic warming – it will be catastrophic EDF 9 – Environmental Defense Fund Jan 13, “Global Warming Myths and Facts,” http://www.edf.org/page.cfm?tagID=1011cn MYTH: We can adapt to climate change — civilization has survived droughts and temperature AND itself will not end, the world as we know it may disappear. K C Trying to reduce suffering doesn’t consume us or cause ressentiment – helping people enriches life Conway 99 – David, Professor of Philosophy at Middlesex University Jun 5, http://www.bu.edu/wcp/Papers/MPsy/MPsyConw.htmcn Nonetheless, Nietzsche was mistaken in supposing that it was contrary to the interests of AND a benefit and not a bane to the person who has the attitude. Perm do both Perm do the alt and all non-comp parts of plan They assume we just read impacts – promoting a clear policy solution solves paralysis and anxiety Sandman and Valenti 86 – Peter and JoAnn, Professor of Human Ecology at Rutgers and Risk Communications Expert “Scared stiff—or scared into action,” http://www.psandman.com/articles/scarstif.htmcn “The main obstacle to action,” writes Frank, “is neither apathy nor AND more inclined to act on solutions they see as more effective.(21) Rejecting the aff doesn’t solve their impacts, and you should hold the alt to reciprocal fiat power – otherwise it destroys our ability to generate offense The alt only rejects the plan – there’s no reason that spills over And, if the alt solves the status quo, it can overcome any residual link to the plan The K is circular – means there’s no impact and no alt Musil 7 – Brad, Ph.D. (philosophy), philosopher Fall, “The Will to Power: An Examination of Nietzsche’s Most Essential Thought,” Onlinecn While some propose that Nietzsche intends to endorse certain actions or events through his theory AND he really did mean it as something universally true of all living beings. Norms are inevitable – the alt worships secularism and power which ensures nuclear extinction Fasching 93 – Darrell, professor in USF's religious studies department The Ethical Challenge of Auschwitz and Hiroshima: Apocalypse or Utopia? pp. 28cn Our modern technological civilization offers us seemingly infinite utopian opportunities to recreate ourselves (e AND us that a normless world will inevitably end in apocalyptic self-destruction. A2: Executive CP – 2AC Frontline Perm: Do Both Perm: Do the CP – CPs should compete BOTH functionally and textually – key to check CPs that steal 100 of the aff XO puts a personal stamp on a policy which causes blame to fall on the President Rodgers 1 – Professor of Law, University of Washington Journal of Land, Resources, and Environmental Law, LEXIScn The downside of the executive order's capacity for decisive declaration is that it offers a AND that was the motivation for President Nixon's National Industrial Pollution Control Council. 37 Executive detention schemes fail Pearlstein 9 – Deborah N., lecturer in public and international affairs, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs July, "Form and Function in the National Security Constitution," Connecticut Law Review, 41 Conn. L. Rev. 1549cs A. Unitary Executive Detention¶ In theory, a detention scheme involving only the AND that help to mitigate errors associated with "emergency" decision- making. Congress key to democratic legitimacy and preventing future vacillation in executive policy Wittes 9 – Benjamin, senior fellow and research director in public law at the Brookings Institution, Stuart Taylor, an American journalist, graduated from Princeton University and Harvard Law School “Legislating the War on Terror: An Agenda for Reform”, November 3, Book, p. 329-330gw While President Obama’s policy makes a clean break with the Bush record, it actually AND past without giving up what the United States will need in the future. Only Congress can create an NSC NSCs are key – only trials in federal courts give the process legitimacy – that’s (*) Future presidents prevent solvency Harvard Law Review 12 "Developments in the Law: Presidential Authority," Vol. 125:2057, www.harvardlawreview.org/media/pdf/vol125_devo.pdf The recent history of signing statements demonstrates how public opinion can effectively check presidential expansions AND practices. 147 Only time, and perhaps public opinion, will tell. Agent PICs are a voting issue – steal the entire plan function, trade off with substantive debates, are infinitely regressive, and aren’t well-grounded in the literature Court will roll back the CP Cooper 2 – Phillip, Professor of Public Administration @ Portland State University By Order of the President: The Use and Abuse of Executive Direct Action” pg..77cn Despite the apparent deference by the judiciary to the president's orders, this chapter has AND the validity of orders and with addressing the consequences of admittedly legitimate decrees. Traditional Article III court kills legitimacy Sulmasy 9 – Glenn, Associate Professor of Law at the US Coast Guard Acaedmy April 13, “THE NEED FOR A NATIONAL SECURITY COURT SYSTEM”cs Thank you Professor, and special thanks to the Journal as well as Chris Borgen AND comes to America’s reputation and credibility abroad on other critical, humanitarian issues.
PTX DA No econ impact Jervis 11 – Robert, Professor in the Department of Political Science and School of International and Public Affairs at Columbia Dec, “Force in Our Times,” Survival, Vol. 25, No. 4, p. 403-425cs Even if war is still seen as evil, the security community could be dissolved AND times bring about greater economic conflict, it will not make war thinkable. No impact—investors are expecting this, so markets won’t react Nicks 9/20—Denver, TIME http://swampland.time.com/2013/09/20/warren-buffett-debt-ceiling-dispute-is-pretty-damn-dumb/ab Failing to come to an agreement between Democrats and Republicans on raising the debt ceiling AND will only act irrationally for a certain length of time,” he said. No deal—Obama and GOP are an impasse Kuhnhenn 9/15—Jim, USA Today www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2013/09/14/obama-lehman-anniversary/2813687ab Obama and Republicans are at a stalemate, however.¶ Obama has proposed some changes AND "We have a spending problem. It must be addressed, period." UQ is backwards – Obama spent all of his PC on Syria—perceived as a loss Bohan 9/11—Caren, Reuters http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/09/11/usa-obama-agenda-idUSL2N0H716N20130911ab WASHINGTON, Sept 11 (Reuters) - Putting off a decision on military strikes AND administration and that's a disadvantage in any kind of negotiation," Pitney said. National Security Court would be bipart McCarthy 13 – Andrew, senior fellow at the National Review Institute and the executive director of the Philadelphia Freedom Center Feb 9, http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/340225/problems-white-paper-andrew-c-mccarthy/page/0/2cs For many years, I have argued that we need a new national-security AND executive discretion but avoids the dangerous excesses of the Justice Department white paper. Fiat solves the link – the plan just IS, and Congress like it; the Disad is a “would” question Winners win Marshall 11 – Bryan W, Miami University and Brandon C. Prins, Howard H. Baker, Jr. Center for Public Policy 2011, “Power or Posturing? Policy Availability and Congressional Influence on U.S. Presidential Decisions to Use Force”, Sept, Presidential Studies Quarterly 41, no. 3cs Presidents rely heavily on Congress in converting their political capital into real policy success. AND made with an eye toward managing political capital at home (Fordham 2002). Obama is hands off—he won’t restrict his own power—Cabinet members would take the blame Becker 12—Jo, NYT 5/29/12, http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/29/world/obamas-leadership-in-war-on-al-qaeda.html?pagewanted=alland_r=0ab Walking out of the Archives, the president turned to his national security adviser at AND Emanuel, blocked them, saying health care reform had to go first. Not Intrinsic – a logical policymaker could do the plan and not backlash against the agenda Terror DA
Congress has already passed detention restrictions Alexander 13 – Janet Cooper, law professor at Stanford March 21, "The Law-Free Zone and Back Again," Illinois Law Review, illinoislawreview.org/wp-content/ilr-content/articles/2013/2/Alexander.pdfcs Congress also passed legislation requiring suspected members of al- Qaeda or “associated forces AND , the D.C. Circuit has since rendered those protections toothless. Risk of terror high now Goldberg 13 – J.J. Goldberg, editor in chief of Forward Published May 31, 2013, issue of June 07, 2013, Real Winner of War on Terror: Osama Bin Laden¶ Decade Later, Terrorists Are Flexing Muscle More Than Ever¶ Read more: http://forward.com/articles/177683/real-winner-of-war-on-terror-osama-bin-laden/?p=all#ixzz2a0jD4R3Mgw The question is, how far along are we in this war? How much AND . It works with a terrorism database maintained by the University of Maryland. Their I/L is describing the status quo – interrogation methods have been stripped – should trigger the link Terrorism isn’t an existential threat Fettweis 10 – Christopher, assistant professor of national security affairs at the U.S. Naval War College 2010, Threat and Anxiety in US Foreign Policy', Survival, 52:2 Even terrorists equipped with nuclear, biological or chemical weapons would be incapable of causing AND unpleasant as such events would be, they do not represent existential threats. Indefinite detention increases terrorist motivation Roberts 11 – Rodney, Associate Professor of Philosophy at East Carolina University “Utilitarianism and the Morality of Indefinite Detention”, Criminal Justice Ethics, Vol. 30, No. 1cs Finally, ‘‘there is no evidence that preventive detention works. Comparative studies of AND can be selfdefeating*it may increase the likelihood of future attacks.31 Indefinite detention generates resentment that kills effective cooperation with locals Hathaway 13 – Oona, Gerard C. and Bernice Latrobe smith Professor of International Law, Yale Law “The Power To Detain: Detention of Terrorism Suspects After 9/11”, The Yale Journal of International Law, Vol. 38cs Legitimacy of the trial process is important not only to the individuals charged but also AND in recent statements from the Department of Defense and the White House.251 NSC diminishes political influence of terrorists worldwide and dampens blowback Lunday 8 – Kevin E., Captain and judge advocate in the U.S. Coast Guard, with Harvey Rishikof, professor of law and former chair of the Department of National Security Strategy, National War College Fall, “Due Process Is a Strategic Choice: Legitimacy and the Establishment of an Article III National Security Court,” 39 Cal. W. Int'l L.J. 87cs A common objection to the establishment of an NSC is that because the primary purpose AND a system that is designed to strategically combat terrorism over the long term.
9/22/13
2AC Round 1 JMU
Tournament: JMU | Round: 1 | Opponent: George Washington Arsht-Stasaski | Judge: Harper CLS – 2AC The role of the ballot is to determine whether hypothetical implementation of the plan is superior to a competitive, reciprocal alternative or the status quo. 1) Ground – non-resolutional frameworks are unpredictable, self-serving, and moot the 1AC 2) Education – they disincentivize topic-specific research and clash, and preclude important discussions about the details of policy And, aff choice solves their offense Method is not first – their approach causes useless paradigm wars Wendt 98 – Alexander, 3rd Most Influential Scholar of IR in the World According to Survey of 1084 IR Scholars “On Constitution and Causation in International Relations,” British International Studies Associationcn As a community, we in the academic study of international politics spend too much AND sparring over epistemology is often one-sided, intolerant caricatures of science. No impact – law is net good Huq 12 – Aziz Z., Assistant Professor of Law, University of Chicago Law School "Binding the Executive (by Law or by Politics)", May 25, www.law.uchicago.edu/files/file/400-ah-binding.pdfcs The Executive Unbound paints a n image of executive discretion almost or completely unbridled by AND up the statutory status quo ante play a role in delimiting executive discretion. The alt fails – reformism is empirically more successful than revolutionary withdrawal Kazin 11 – Michael, Professor of History at Georgetown Has the US Left Made a Difference, Dissent Spring p. 52-54cs But when political radicals made a big difference, they generally did so as decidedly AND …are too much to live up to and too much to escape.” Perm do the plan and all non-competitive parts of the alternative – if the alt can overcome the squo, it can overcome the residual link to the plan Perm solves – can incorporate the alt Altman 90 – Andrew, Professor of Philosophy at Georgia State Critical Legal Studies: A Liberal Critique, page 8cs In addition, it would be a distortion of liberal theory to suggest that it AND demand or prohibiting antilegalism from going so far as to destroy all legal institution Critical legal philosophy can’t explain the world Stick 86 – John, Assistant Professor of Law at Tulane University School of Law “Can Nihilism Be Pragmatic?”, Harvard Law Review, Vol. 100, No. 2 (Dec., 1986), pp. 332-401, JSTORcs This Article examines the relationship between the critical legal nihilists and the philosophers they rely AND a fortiori Singer is too much of an irrationalist for the others. 18 Legal positivism is the best methodology – refined by the moral sentiment of the community. Finnis 96 – Professor of Law at Oxford and Notre Dame John, “The Truth in Legal Positivism,” in The Autonomy of Law, ed. Robert P. George. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 195-214cs ‘There is a necessary or conceptual connection between law and morality.’ True AND moral force to those parts of its positive law which are morally acceptable.¶ Our framing of warming overcomes disbelief and mobilizes public responses Romm 12 – Joe, Ph.D. in physics from MIT, Fellow at American Progress and is the editor of Climate Progress, acting assistant secretary of energy for energy efficiency and renewable energy in 1997, Time named him a “Hero of the Environment? and “The Web’s most influential climate-change blogger.” “Apocalypse Not: The Oscars, The Media And The Myth of ‘Constant Repetition of Doomsday Messages’ on Climate”, http://thinkprogress.org/romm/2012/02/26/432546/apocalypse-not-oscars-media-myth-of-repetition-of-doomsday-messages-on-climate/#more-432546cs The two greatest myths about global warming communications are 1) constant repetition of doomsday AND by most of the rest of the media, intelligentsia and popular culture.
Cap key to solve warming Whitman 8 – Janet, US Business Correspondent at Canada's National Post Feb 19, http://www.financialpost.com/story.html?id=317551 Global warming may soon get a saviour more effective than Al Gore and his doomsday AND give the product away and reap the financial reward from government carbon credits. You have an a priori ethical obligation to affirm private property rights Hoppe 93 – Hans-Hermann, Professor of Economics at UNLV Mar 31, http://www.mises.org/store/Economics-and-Ethics-of-Private-Property-P288C0.aspx?AFID=1 First, it must be noted that the question of what is just or unjust AND rights now, and cannot wait for them to be assigned only later. Aff outweighs: EITHER they have no brink because the ills of capitalism have existed for centuries, OR they do and the alt would take too long to solve anyway Cap prevents war Griswold 5 – Daniel, director of the Center for Trade Policy Studies at CATO Dec 28, http://www.freetrade.org/node/282cn As one little-noticed headline on an Associated Press story recently reported, " AND measured in terms of intellectual property, financial assets, and human capital. A2: Capitalism K – 2AC ALT Frontline The ALT only rejects the plan – that doesn’t spillover And, they can’t wish away capitalism – reciprocal fiat power is key to our ability to generate offense The desire for growth is innate – the alt fails and leads to poverty, violence, and no meaning to life Aligica 3 – Paul, Fellow at the Mercatus Center at George Mason and Adjunct Fellow at the Hudson Institute Apr 21, http://www.hudson.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=publication_detailsandid=2827cn Stopping things would mean if not to engage in an experiment to change the human AND are trying to avoid" (Kahn, 1976, 210; 1984). Vote aff to vote neg – the ballot is a form of capital that they’re trying to earn by debating better than us Cap is inevitable – human adaptation solves the bad aspects Ringmar 5 – Erik, Ph.D., professor of Social and Cultural Studies at the National Chiao Tung University, Taiwan Surviving Capitalism: How We Learned to Live with the Market and Remained Almost Human, pp. 4-5cn And now we are thus invited to do it all over again. We should AND a right that we cannot sell, even if we wanted to.9
A2: Neoliberalism K – 2AC IMPACT Frontline Aff outweighs: EITHER they have no brink because the ills of neoliberalism have existed for decades, OR they do and the alt would take too long to solve anyway Liberal economic policies prevent war, imperialism, and otherization Griswold 98 – Daniel T., associate director of the Center for Trade Policy Studies at the CATO Institute Dec 31, http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=5759cn Advocates of free trade have long argued that its benefits are not merely economic. AND
that no two nations with McDonald's franchises have ever gone to war. There’s no scenario for their impacts under Obama – all their ev. assumes Bush We control uniqueness – free market growth solves global poverty and inequality Frieden 10 – Jeffrey, Professor of Government at Harvard; researches international monetary and financial relations Mar 6, http://www.hceronline.com/?q=node/48cn The good news about global inequality is that it has been declining. The world AND of broad and deep global markets for goods, capital, and technology. Neolib reforms key to space – only way to prevent terminal extinction Wasser 10 – Alan, premier legal authority on Space Property Rights, former broadcast journalist May 9, http://spacebusinessblog.blogspot.com/2010/05/space-property-rights-interview-with.htmlcn I'm just hoping that, now that the President has made it official, the AND forum on the subject that includes a dozen key legislative space aides already. A2: Executive CP – 2AC Frontline CP text flaw – says that “Congress should mandate that all such individuals are tried – means they link to the N/B Perm: Do Both Perm: Do the CP – CPs should compete BOTH functionally and textually – key to check CPs that steal 100 of the aff XO puts a personal stamp on a policy which causes blame to fall on the President Rodgers 1 – Professor of Law, University of Washington Journal of Land, Resources, and Environmental Law, LEXIScn The downside of the executive order's capacity for decisive declaration is that it offers a AND that was the motivation for President Nixon's National Industrial Pollution Control Council. 37 Executive detention schemes fail Pearlstein 9 – Deborah N., lecturer in public and international affairs, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs July, "Form and Function in the National Security Constitution," Connecticut Law Review, 41 Conn. L. Rev. 1549cs A. Unitary Executive Detention¶ In theory, a detention scheme involving only the AND that help to mitigate errors associated with "emergency" decision- making. Congress key to democratic legitimacy and preventing future vacillation in executive policy Wittes 9 – Benjamin, senior fellow and research director in public law at the Brookings Institution, Stuart Taylor, an American journalist, graduated from Princeton University and Harvard Law School “Legislating the War on Terror: An Agenda for Reform”, November 3, Book, p. 329-330gw While President Obama’s policy makes a clean break with the Bush record, it actually AND past without giving up what the United States will need in the future. Only Congress can create an NSC – Lunday Future presidents prevent solvency Harvard Law Review 12 "Developments in the Law: Presidential Authority," Vol. 125:2057, www.harvardlawreview.org/media/pdf/vol125_devo.pdf The recent history of signing statements demonstrates how public opinion can effectively check presidential expansions AND practices. 147 Only time, and perhaps public opinion, will tell. Agent PICs are a voting issue – steal the entire plan function, trade off with substantive debates, are infinitely regressive, and aren’t well-grounded in the literature Court will roll back the CP Cooper 2 – Phillip, Professor of Public Administration @ Portland State University By Order of the President: The Use and Abuse of Executive Direct Action” pg..77cn Despite the apparent deference by the judiciary to the president's orders, this chapter has AND the validity of orders and with addressing the consequences of admittedly legitimate decrees. C A2: Prez Powers DA – 2AC Heg solves the impact Middle East conflicts won’t escalate Maloney and Takeyh 7 – Susan, senior fellow for Middle East Policy at the Center for Middle East Studies at the Brookings Institution, Ray, senior fellow for Middle East Studies at the Council on Foreign Relations 6/28, http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2007/0628iraq_maloney.aspxcn Yet, the Saudis, Iranians, Jordanians, Syrians, and others are very AND its civil strife and prevent local conflicts from enveloping the entire Middle East. No Israeli strike Feldman 12 – Shia, Judith and Sidney Swartz Director of the Crown Center for Middle East Studies at Brandeis University and is a Senior Fellow at the Harvard Kennedy School's Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs 8/20/12, The Israeli debate on attacking Iran is over, mideast.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2012/08/20/the_israeli_debate_on_attacking_iran_is_overgw For all practical purposes this weekend ended the Israeli debate on attacking Iran. What AND nuclear installations. The debate has been settled. At least for now. Warming causes the impact – regional wars due to resource shortages – makes tensions high Syria tanked resolve Cordseman 13 – Anthony, Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) in Washington, D.C. 9/1, “President Obama and Syria: The ‘Waiting for Godot’ Strategy,” http://csis.org/publication/president-obama-and-syria-waiting-godot-strategycs Instead, the Administration first rushed into the kind of rhetoric you only use if AND to return for its holiday. The message to the world is obvious. Their internal link is wrong – tech advances and elusive enemies cannot be deterred Holmes 9 – Stephen, Walter E. Meyer Professor of Law, New York University School of Law “The Brennan Center Jorde Symposium on Constitutional Law: In Case of Emergency: Misunderstanding Tradeoffs in the War on Terror”, April, California Law Review, 97 Calif. L. Rev. 301, Lexiscs Even if the promoters of unfettered executive power were justified in associating legal rules with AND is the fruit of wishful thinking is the least that might be said. No link – NSC preserves executive flexibility McCarthy and Velshi 9 – Andrew, Director of the Center for Law and Counterterrorism at the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies and Alykhan, attorney at the Center for Law and Counterterrorism Aug. 20, “Outsourcing American Law,” AEI Working Paper, http://www.aei.org/files/2009/08/20/20090820-Chapter6.pdfcs What is an asset in the criminal justice system, however, would be a AND be at liberty to create new entitlements by analogizing to ordinary criminal proceedings. Focus on prez action causes terrible policy---the aff's a better approach Jonathan Mercer 8/28, 2013, associate professor of political science at the University of Washington in Seattle and a Fellow at the Center for International Studies at the London School of Economics. Bad Reputation, 28 August 2013, www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/139376/jonathan-mercer/bad-reputation
Even if Assad were so simpleminded, the administration’s critics are wrong to suggest that AND of mass destruction. Their impact evidence is describing the SQ Joffe 13 – Josef, WSJ Exploiting Obama's Foreign Policy Retreatcs "We are extremely disappointed," the White House press secretary said after Moscow granted AND in the Middle East has been a top American priority since the 1970s. and Imperial Japan. In our time, it is second-rate powers like Russia and Iran, and non-nations like Hezbollah, that are taking on the United States, and they do so because they can.
Restriction means a limit or qualification, and includes conditions on action
CAA 8 ~COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT A, STATE OF ARIZONA, Appellee, v. JEREMY RAY WAGNER, Appellant., 2008 Ariz. App. Unpub. LEXIS 613~cs P10 The term "restriction" is not defined by the Legislature for the purposes AND natural and obvious meaning, which may be discerned from its dictionary definition."). P11 The dictionary definition of "restriction" is "~a~ limitation or qualification AND dictate that the term "restriction" includes the ignition interlock device limitation.
"Statutory restriction" means limits imposed by legislation
1) There’s no in-round abuse – and we have a solvency advocate and pass the one-card test 2) Good is good enough – our interpretation provides predictable limits and fair ground,– "best interpretation" is a myth since marginal differences in limits and ground are subjective and outweighed by the loss in aff predictability and substantive crowd-out
A2: Drone-Shift DA 2AC *Updated*
No SCS or ECS conflict
Gupta 11 – Rukmani, Associate Fellow @ the Institute for Defense Studies and Analyses ~10/23/11, "South China Sea Conflict? No Way", the-diplomat.com/2011/10/23/south-china-sea-conflict-no-way/~job Despite what opinion pieces in the Global Times may say, there’s reason to suspect AND seen as attempts to exaggerate claims so as to secure a better negotiating stance
Dramatic shift to drones in the SQuo
Lefkowitz 13 – Jay, senior lawyer and former domestic policy advisor to President George W. ~Mar 4, Financial Times, "Drones are no substitute for detention," www.ft.com/cms/s/0/dae6552c-84c2-11e2-891d-00144feabdc0.html~23axzz2dZnIVyqb~cs Memo to all those critics of Guantánamo Bay: beware what you wish for. AND promptly administered through military courts – instead of taking the easy way out.
No drone shift link – too many external factors
Chesney 11 – Robert, Charles I. Francis Professor in Law at the UT School of Law as well as a non-resident Senior Fellow at Brookings ~Oct 17, "Examining the Evidence of a Detention-Drone Strike Tradeoff," www.lawfareblog.com/2011/10/examining-the-evidence-of-a-detention-drone-strike-tradeoff/~cs Yesterday Jack linked to this piece by Noah Feldman, which among other things advances AND detention versus targeting, but something much more complex and difficult to measure.
Bringing credibility to detention solves the shift
Whitlock 13 – Craig, Washington Post ~Jan 1, "Renditions continue under Obama, despite due-process concerns," articles.washingtonpost.com/2013-01-01/world/36323571_1_obama-administration-interrogation-drone-strikes~cs The three European men with Somali roots were arrested on a murky pretext in August AND Renditions, though controversial and complex, represent one of the few alternatives.
Their internal link is hype – other countries don’t make drone choices based on US policies – it’s too easy to get the tech
Congress will rollback judicial limits on war powers – and CP links to politics even if rollback fails
Katz 8 – Martin, J.D. (Yale), Associate Professor of Law, University of Denver College of Law ~Aug 17, GUANTANAMO, BOUMEDIENE, AND JURISDICTION-STRIPPING: THE IMPERIAL PRESIDENT MEETS THE IMPERIAL COURT, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1250222~~cn First, in the wake of controversial federal court decisions, opponents have¶ occasionally AND engaged the minds of many of the¶ country’s finest constitutional scholars.13
Agent CPs are a voting issue – kill topic education by focusing on trivial distinctions in process, steal the entire aff and encourage vague plans. Years of agent debates mean there’s no offense – reject the team to set a precedent
This is empirically proven in the context of detention
Katz 8 – Martin, J.D. (Yale), Associate Professor of Law, University of Denver College of Law ~Aug 17, GUANTANAMO, BOUMEDIENE, AND JURISDICTION-STRIPPING: THE IMPERIAL PRESIDENT MEETS THE IMPERIAL COURT, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1250222~~cn In this respect, one might even comment on the Court’s restraint. The¶ AND Thus, the Court may have decided to take that role upon itself.
Delays and security issues means CP doesn’t solve
Guioria 9 – Amos N., Professor of Law at the Quinney College of Law, University of Utah ~"Creating a Domestic Terror Court~cs As mentioned above, this article assumes that both traditional Article III courts and international AND purposes but cannot under any circumstances-be the sole basis of conviction.
Civilian trials aren’t suited for detainees– increases risk of terror and makes the process less efficient
Goldsmith 9 – Jack, Henry L. Shattuck Professor at Harvard Law School ~Feb 4, "Long-Term Terrorist Detention and Our National Security Court"~cs As a result of these considerations, insistence on the exclusive use of criminal trials AND , while reviewing the adequacy of the factual basis for each detention judgment.
Nuke terrorism triggers nuclear war with Russia and China
Ayson 10 – Robert, Professor of Strategic Studies and Director of the Centre for Strategic Studies: New Zealand at the Victoria University of Wellington ~"After a Terrorist Nuclear Attack: Envisaging Catalytic Effects," Studies in Conflict 26 Terrorism, Volume 33, Issue 7, July, Available Online to Subscribing Institutions via InformaWorld~cn A terrorist nuclear attack, and even the use of nuclear weapons in response by AND for the terrorists. This might not help the chances of nuclear restraint.
Perm do the Counterplan
It has to be Congress – they’ll block any other branch otherwise
Koplow 5 – David A., professor of law at Georgetown ~Spring, "Tangled Up in Khaki and Blue," 36 Geo. J. Int’l L., Lexis~cs A second crucial principle of international humanitarian law is that of discrimination or distinction: AND to pepper spray to acoustic waves have undergone and survived this gauntlet. n144
Broad interpretation of the doctrine is unsustainable - cases that limit its application key to strengthen it
Frost 7 – Amanda, Associate Professor of Law, American University Washington College of Law ~"Reforming the State Secrets Privilege", http://www.acslaw.org/files/Frost20FINAL.pdf-http://www.acslaw.org/files/Frost FINAL.pdf~cs As scholars, lawyers, and policymakers have recognized, the executive branch can place AND claims of privilege, it should better police its assertions of the privilege.
State secrets privilege has already been reduced – Jewel v NSA
In 2012, back in district court, the government moved to dismiss, for AND thus becomes a matter of the amount of evidence that can be disclosed.
The court has continuously broken state secrets for detention
Adelsberg 12 – Samuel, JD Yale Law ~"Bouncing the Executive’s Blank Check: Judicial Review and the Targeting of Citizens," Summer, 6 Harv. L. 26 Pol’y Rev. 437, lexis~cs Far from giving the executive an unfettered national security mandate, the Supreme Court has AND the latter situation, the damage is fatal, and thus irreversible. 30
No link – state secrets is a question of standing –breaking it in this instance simply grants standing, it doesn’t "destroy the doctrine"
EFF 12 – Electronic Frontier Foundation ~Foundation "The State Secrets Privilege", https://www.eff.org/nsa-spying/state-secrets-privilege)\~cs What is the State Secrets Privilege The Supreme Court recognized the ’state secrets’ privilege AND facts from judicial review if plaintiffs had the same evidence from another source.
2AC—Iran
Just released detainees from Gitmo – DA is n/u
Rosenberg 1/2 ~Carol Rosenberg - The Miami Herald/McClatchy-Tribune, Guantanamo releases picked up as 2013 drew to a close, Corpus Christi Caller-Times, Janaury 2, 2014joe) In rapid succession, the U.S. in December sent Guantanamo prisoners home AND -by-case basis, fashioning specific solutions for each individual captive.
Zero risk of Iran strikes
Maloney 14 – Suzanne, Brookings Center Senior fellow ~1/13, Six Myths about Iran Sanctions, www.brookings.edu/blogs/iran-at-saban/posts/2014/01/7-iran-sanctions-nuclear-deal-myths?utm_content=bufferb504526utm_medium=social26utm_source=twitter.com26utm_campaign=buffer~23~cs Myth 6. Support for additional Iran sanctions is the equivalent of support for war AND for blunting Iran’s nuclear advances, including many that fall short of war.
No sanctions now – Momentum has reversed and next time, Reid will be key
Bendry 1/30 – Jennifer, with Luke Johnson ~2014, Iran Sanctions Bill ’On Ice’ As Momentum Fades In Senate. Huffington Post~cs It took a presidential veto threat and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s refusal to budge AND off of it," said Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.).
Reid thinks flexible trials are best – he loves the plan
Marshall 11 – Bryan W, Miami University and Brandon C. Prins, Howard H. Baker, Jr. Center for Public Policy ~2011, "Power or Posturing? Policy Availability and Congressional Influence on U.S. Presidential Decisions to Use Force", Sept, Presidential Studies Quarterly 41, no. 3~cs Presidents rely heavily on Congress in converting their political capital into real policy success. AND made with an eye toward managing political capital at home (Fordham 2002).
Obama has no PC left
Business Monitor 1/24 ~2014, Foreign Policy - Obama’s Foreign Policy In 2014: Risks Outweigh Opportunities. Lexis~cs The deterioration in public opinion is consistent across party identification, with Democrats, Republicans AND to push for his priorities in the final three years of his presidency.
Fiat solves the link – the plan just IS, and Congress like it; the Disad is a "would" question
"Political Capital" is a myth
Hirsh, 13 — Chief correspondent for National Journal ~Michael Hirsh, Chief correspondent for National Journal; previously served as the senior editor and national economics correspondent for Newsweek, based in its Washington bureau, There’s No Such Thing as Political Capital, National Journal, February 7, 2013.~(nsb) On Tuesday, in his State of the Union address, President Obama will do AND to do with Obama’s political capital or, indeed, Obama at all.
Not Intrinsic – a logical policymaker could do the plan and not backlash against the agenda
Obama is hands off—he won’t restrict his own power—Cabinet members would take the blame
Tournament: Shirley | Round: 2 | Opponent: Bard College Daniszewski-Nesser | Judge: Leader FW Prefer our Interpretation: First, limits on affirmative ground are key to focused deliberation about the issues we discuss – that’s key to inculcate decision-making skills Steinberg and Freeley 8 – Austin J. Freeley is a Boston based attorney who focuses on criminal, personal injury and civil rights law, and David L. Steinberg , Lecturer of Communication Studies at U Miami Argumentation and Debate: Critical Thinking for Reasoned Decision Making pp45-gw Debate is a means of settling differences, so there must be a difference of AND particular point of difference, which will be outlined in the following discussion. Decision-making is key to solve multiple existential risks Lundberg 10 – Christian O., Professor of Communications @ University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, “Tradition of Debate in North Carolina” in Navigating Opportunity: Policy Debate in the 21st Century By Allan D. Louden, p311gw The second major problem with the critique that identifies a naivety in articulating debate and AND with the existential challenges to democracy in an increasingly complex world. Second, their interpretation deprives the neg of the best ground for debate – agreeing on problems is easy – identifying solutions is the real ground for debate Rosenthal 9 – Alan, professor of public policy and political science at Rutgers University Jul, http://www.ncsl.org/documents/public/trust/LessonPlans_HS.pdfcn The environment is a rough one, but a most important obstacle democracy faces is AND many of the states attests to the division in the ranks of Americans. Third, in-depth debates about policymaking are key to create effective activists and solve societal problems McClean 1 – David, Ph.D., Lecturer in Philosophy, Molloy College, New York and Rutgers University “The Cultural Left and the Limits of Social Hope,” www.american-philosophy.org/archives/past_conference_programs/pc2001/Discussion20papers/david_mcclean.htmcn Yet for some reason, at least partially explicated in Richard Rorty's Achieving Our Country AND critics with their snobish disrespect for the so-called "managerial class." Fourth, defending both sides of issues encourages self-reflexive behavior, which breaks down dogmatism and checks totalitarianism Roberts-Miller 3 – Patricia, Associate Professor of Rhetoric at the University of Texas "Fighting Without Hatred:Hannah Ar endt ' s Agonistic Rhetoric" JAC 22.2 2003 Totalitarianism and the Competitive Space of Agonismgw Arendt is probably most famous for her analysis of totalitarianism (especially her The Origins AND is permitted to present itself in only one perspective. (Human 58) What Arendt so beautifully describes is that isolation and individualism are not corollaries, and AND even similarly but not exactly together is what Arendt calls the "social." Arendt does not mean that group behavior is impossible in the realm of the social AND . Thus, it is, as Arendt says, rule by nobody. It is illustrative to contrast Arendt's attitude toward discourse to Habermas'. While both are AND discourse involved in public action include myths, stories, and personal narratives. Furthermore, the competition is not ruthless; it does not imply a willingness to AND one of different people who argue with passion, vehemence, and integrity. Continued… Eichmann perfectly exemplified what Arendt famously called the "banal¬ity of evil" AND disparaging conformism" that characterizes those who people totalitarian systems (Pitkin 87). Arendt's theorizing of totalitarianism has been justly noted as one of her strongest contributions to philosophy. She saw that a situation like Nazi Germany is different from the conventional understanding of a tyranny. Pitkin writes, Totalitarianism cannot be understood, like earlier forms of domination, as the ruthless exploitation of some people by others, whether the motive be selfish calculation, irrational passion, or devotion to some cause. Understanding totalitarianism's essential nature requires solving the central mystery of the holocaust—the objectively useless and indeed dysfunctional, fanatical pursuit of a purely ideological policy, a pointless process to which the people enacting it have fallen captive. (87) Totalitarianism is closely connected to bureaucracy; it is oppression by rules, rather than by people who have willfully chosen to establish certain rules. It is the triumph of the social. Critics (both friendly and hostile) have paid considerable attention to Arendt's category of AND and turning us into robots that mechanically serve its purposes" (4). Pitkin is critical of this version of the "social" and suggests that Arendt AND put it another way, theories of powerlessness are self-fulfilling prophecies. Arendt grants that there are people who willed the Holocaust, but she insists that AND "critical thought is in principle anti-authoritarian" (Lectures 38). By "thought" Arendt does not mean eremitic contemplation; in fact, she AND that harmony. One must consider carefully the arguments and viewpoints of others: Political thought is representative. I form an opinion by considering a given issue from AND more valid my final conclusions, my opinion. ("Truth" 241) There are two points to emphasize in this wonderful passage. First, one does AND a world into which one enters and by which one might be changed. Second, passages like the above make some readers think that Arendt puts too much AND destroy truth, but they cannot replace it" ("Truth" 259). Facts have a strangely resilient quality partially because a lie "tears, as it AND of opinion is a farce unless factual information is guaranteed" (238). The sort of thinking that Arendt propounds takes the form of action only when it AND thoughts without reference to anyone else or to let others do one's thinking. Arendt's Polemical Agonism As I said, agonism does have its advocates within rhetoric—Burke, Ong AND "understood and believed" by others (Shape 5; emphasis added). Arendt's version is what one might call polemical agonism: it puts less emphasis on AND polemical agonism, success may be marked through the quality of subsequent controversy. Arendt quotes from a letter Kant wrote on this point: You know that I do not approach reasonable objections with the intention merely of refuting them, but that in thinking them over I always weave them into my judgments, and afford them the opportunity of overturning all my most cherished beliefs. I entertain the hope that by thus viewing my judgments impartially from the standpoint of others some third view that will improve upon my previous insight may be obtainable. {Lectures 42) Kant's use of "impartial" here is interesting: he is not describing a AND butprovocative application of Arendt's notion of common, see Hauser 100-03). In polemical agonism, there is a sense in which one' s main goal is AND ¬larged" {Lectures 39); he wanted interlocutors, not acolytes. This is not consensus-based argument, nor is it what is sometimes called AND , the conflictual versus the collaborative, or argument as opposed to debate. Second, while polemical agonismrequires diversity among interlocutors, and thus seems an extraordinarily appropriate AND of argument versus when we are lusting for dominion ("Truth" 263). Like other proponents of agonism, Arendt argues that rhetoric does not lead individuals or AND in lack of imagination and failure to judge" ("Truth" 242). Agonism demands that one simultaneously trust and doubt one' s own perceptions, rely on AND these few have not become fewer in our time" {Human 324). Yet, there are important positive political consequences of agonism. Arendt' s own promotion of the agonistic sphere helps to explain how the system could AND is, engage in rhetoric—then they are engaging in antitotalitarian action. In post-Ramistic rhetoric, it is a convention to have a thesis, AND not relativist, adversarial but not violent, independent but not expressivist rhetoric.
11/29/13
2AC Round 3 GSU
Tournament: GSU | Round: 4 | Opponent: James Madison BoMi | Judge: Atchison, Jarrod ILaw Turn – an easy path to legal detention solves the shift Whitlock 13 – Craig, Washington Post Jan 1, "Renditions continue under Obama, despite due-process concerns,” articles.washingtonpost.com/2013-01-01/world/36323571_1_obama-administration-interrogation-drone-strikescs The three European men with Somali roots were arrested on a murky pretext in August AND Renditions, though controversial and complex, represent one of the few alternatives. Coop Structural advantages ensure continued U.S. dominance – prefer our empirical, long-term trends to their biased, short term conjectures Lieber 8 – Robert, Prof of Intl Affairs at Georgetown, World Affairs Summer, http://www.worldaffairsjournal.org/200820-20Summer/full-Lieber.htmlcn In the end, then, this country's structural advantages matter much more than economic AND The critiques come and go. The object of their contempt never does. Framework – 2AC The role of the ballot is to determine whether hypothetical implementation of the plan is superior to a competitive, reciprocal alternative or the status quo. 1) Ground – non-resolutional frameworks are unpredictable, self-serving, and moot the 1AC 2) Education – they disincentivize topic-specific research and clash, and preclude important discussions about the details of policy And, aff choice solves their offense A2: K Perm do both Perm do the plan and all non-comp parts of alt The perm solves and the alt fails – Working from within the system is key to produce change James 9 – Assistant Professor in the Philosophy Department at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte Robin M, Autonomy, Universality, and Playing the Guitar: On the Politics and Aesthetics of Contemporary Feminist Deployments of the “Master's Tools”, April 14, DOI: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2009.01033.xgw Norma Coates expresses here an ethical and aesthetic quandary we might term a “feminist AND and the Stones, as “sexy”—as mainstream/conventional discourse. C State not root cause of whiteness Shelby 7 – Tommie Shelby, Professor of African and African American Studies and of Philosophy at Harvard, 2007, We Who Are Dark: The Philosophical Foundations of Black Solidarity Others might challenge the distinction between ideological and structural causes of black disadvantage, on AND developments (such as immigration policy or reduced federal funding for higher education). Our “even if” arg. If they win the State’s uniformly racist in current form, still vote Aff. Ignores reconstructive liberalism, and what the State *could yet become*. Contextualizes to plan and perm Ward ‘99 Cynthia V. Ward – Professor of Law, College of William and Mary. WILLIAM AND MARY LAW REVIEW Vol. 40:719 – http://scholarship.law.wm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1554andcontext=wmlr
However bruised by the continuous attacks of its radical critics, "liberal legalism" AND respecting and encouraging human "difference" while also maximizing freedom and equality. On the other side, the work of radical critics of liberalism has begun to AND along with the scourges of racism and sexism that have always shadowed them. It is tempting to oversimplify. One should take seriously the declared motivations and concerns AND form, will become the single most dramatic result of radical legal theory.
Rejecting state reform ignores the historical successes of multiple oppressed groups and ensures no change occurs Collins 97 – Patricia Hill, professor of sociology at the University of Cincinnati Fighting Words, p. 135-136cn In this sense, postmodern views of power that overemphasize hegemony and local politics provide AND even the vocabulary of protest and rightful demand” (1993, 13). Abandoning state reforms causes worse forces to fill-in Barbrook 97 – Dr. Richard, Professor of Social Sciences, University of Westminister Jun 5, http://www.nettime.org/Lists-Archives/nettime-l-9706/msg00034.htmlgw I thought that this position is clear from my remarks about the ultra-left AND can be a fun artistic pose. However, human suffering is not. Lack of a positive alternative fails and leads to marginalization Walt 98 – Stephen, Prof of IR at Harvard University Foreign Policy Is 110, “International Theories: One World, Many Theories”cn As marxism succumbed to its various failings, its mantle was assumed by a group AND they remained a self-consciously dissident minority for most of the 1980s.
A2: Executive CP – 2AC Frontline Perm: Do Both Perm: Do the CP – CPs should compete BOTH functionally and textually – key to check CPs that steal 100 of the aff XO puts a personal stamp on a policy which causes blame to fall on the President Rodgers 1 – Professor of Law, University of Washington Journal of Land, Resources, and Environmental Law, LEXIScn The downside of the executive order's capacity for decisive declaration is that it offers a AND that was the motivation for President Nixon's National Industrial Pollution Control Council. 37 Executive detention schemes fail Pearlstein 9 – Deborah N., lecturer in public and international affairs, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs July, "Form and Function in the National Security Constitution," Connecticut Law Review, 41 Conn. L. Rev. 1549cs A. Unitary Executive Detention¶ In theory, a detention scheme involving only the AND that help to mitigate errors associated with "emergency" decision- making. Congress key to democratic legitimacy and preventing future vacillation in executive policy Wittes 9 – Benjamin, senior fellow and research director in public law at the Brookings Institution, Stuart Taylor, an American journalist, graduated from Princeton University and Harvard Law School “Legislating the War on Terror: An Agenda for Reform”, November 3, Book, p. 329-330gw While President Obama’s policy makes a clean break with the Bush record, it actually AND past without giving up what the United States will need in the future. Congressional power of the purse rolls back the CP – they’d just create another AUMF Fisher 4 – Senior Specialist in Separation of Powers with the Congressional Research Service, LOC Louis, Presidential War Power: Second Edition, Revised, p. 274-277 Statutory Restrictions Instead of relying on unpredictable court decisions, Congress must learn to invoke the powerful AND unless the President requested an extension from Congress and received legislative authority.53 Only Congress can create an NSC – 1AC Lunday evidence Future presidents prevent solvency Harvard Law Review 12 "Developments in the Law: Presidential Authority," Vol. 125:2057, www.harvardlawreview.org/media/pdf/vol125_devo.pdf The recent history of signing statements demonstrates how public opinion can effectively check presidential expansions AND practices. 147 Only time, and perhaps public opinion, will tell. Agent PICs are a voting issue – steal the entire plan function, trade off with substantive debates, are infinitely regressive, and aren’t well-grounded in the literature 2AC – PTX No econ impact Jervis 11 – Robert, Professor in the Department of Political Science and School of International and Public Affairs at Columbia Dec, “Force in Our Times,” Survival, Vol. 25, No. 4, p. 403-425cs Even if war is still seen as evil, the security community could be dissolved AND times bring about greater economic conflict, it will not make war thinkable. Missing an I/L – plan is not unpopular – means not PC spent Won’t pass—neither part will negotiate Weisman 9/12—Jonathan, NYT www.nytimes.com/2013/09/13/us/politics/at-meeting-with-treasury-secretary-boehner-pressed-for-debt-ceiling-deal.htmlab WASHINGTON — With the Syrian crisis receding on Capitol Hill, Congress on Thursday plunged AND political games” and suggested that many Republicans had lost touch with reality. Obamacare fight thumps the DA Bowman 9/12—Michael, senate correspondant for Voice of America www.voanews.com/content/more-us-fiscal-battles-loom/1748716.htmlab CAPITOL HILL — After two weeks focused on the crisis in Syria, the U AND . That is what it is," said Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell. Debt ceiling will not collapse the economy—empirics prove Tanner 11—National Review 1/19, http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/257433/no-surrender-debt-ceiling-michael-tannerab Of course the Obama administration is already warning of Armageddon if Congress doesn’t raise the AND continue merrily on our way spending more and running up ever more debt? National Security Court would be bipart McCarthy 13 – Andrew, senior fellow at the National Review Institute and the executive director of the Philadelphia Freedom Center Feb 9, http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/340225/problems-white-paper-andrew-c-mccarthy/page/0/2cs For many years, I have argued that we need a new national-security AND executive discretion but avoids the dangerous excesses of the Justice Department white paper. Fiat solves the link – the plan just IS, and Congress like it; the Disad is a “would” question Obama is hands off—he won’t restrict his own power—Cabinet members would take the blame Becker 12—Jo, NYT 5/29/12, http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/29/world/obamas-leadership-in-war-on-al-qaeda.html?pagewanted=alland_r=0ab Walking out of the Archives, the president turned to his national security adviser at AND Emanuel, blocked them, saying health care reform had to go first. Not Intrinsic – a logical policymaker could do the plan and not backlash against the agenda
A2: Prez Powers DA – 2AC Congress just passed limitations of indefinite detention—non uniques the DA Alexander 13—Janet, law prof @ Stanford 3/21, illinoislawreview.org/wp-content/ilr-content/articles/2013/2/Alexander.pdfab/cs Congress also passed legislation requiring suspected members of al- Qaeda or “associated forces AND , the D.C. Circuit has since rendered those protections toothless. Terrorists can’t obtain or use nukes Chapman 8 – Steven, columnist and editorial writer for the Chicago Tribune 2/8, http://reason.com/news/show/124874.htmlcn Ever since Sept. 11, 2001, in this war, it appears, AND the worst eventuality is one that will never happen. Indefinite detention increases the motivation for terrorism Roberts 11 – Rodney, Associate Professor of Philosophy at East Carolina University “Utilitarianism and the Morality of Indefinite Detention”, Criminal Justice Ethics, Vol. 30, No. 1cs Finally, ‘‘there is no evidence that preventive detention works. Comparative studies of AND can be selfdefeating*it may increase the likelihood of future attacks.31 Oversight doesn’t determine flexibility---tech, elusive enemies and personnel outweigh Holmes 9 – Stephen, Walter E. Meyer Professor of Law, New York University School of Law “The Brennan Center Jorde Symposium on Constitutional Law: In Case of Emergency: Misunderstanding Tradeoffs in the War on Terror”, April, California Law Review, 97 Calif. L. Rev. 301, Lexiscs Even if the promoters of unfettered executive power were justified in associating legal rules with AND is the fruit of wishful thinking is the least that might be said. No link – NSC preserves enough executive flexibility McCarthy and Velshi 9 – Andrew, Director of the Center for Law and Counterterrorism at the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies and Alykhan, attorney at the Center for Law and Counterterrorism Aug. 20, “Outsourcing American Law,” AEI Working Paper, http://www.aei.org/files/2009/08/20/20090820-Chapter6.pdfcs What is an asset in the criminal justice system, however, would be a AND be at liberty to create new entitlements by analogizing to ordinary criminal proceedings. and Imperial Japan. In our time, it is second-rate powers like Russia and Iran, and non-nations like Hezbollah, that are taking on the United States, and they do so because they can.
We meet – the plan establishes a statue of restriction
Mortenson 11 – Julian Davis, Assistant Professor at the University of Michigan Law School ~Winter, "Review: Executive Power and the Discipline of History Crisis and Command: The History of Executive Power from George Washington to George W. Bush John Yoo. Kaplan, 2009. Pp vii, 524," University of Chicago Law Review 78 U. Chi. L. Rev. 377~cs At least two of Yoo’s main examples of presidential power are actually instances of presidential AND (III, pp 295-301, 310, 327-28).
C/I – Statutory restrictions are legislative limits
The Law Dictionary 13 – Featuring definitions from Black’s Law Dictionary http://thelawdictionary.org/statutory-restriction/ What is STATUTORY RESTRICTION? Limits or controls that have been place on activities by its ruling legislation.
Specifically, we are a restriction on war powers
Lobel 8 – Jules, Professor of Law at the University of Pittsburgh, Law School, President of the center for Constitutional Rights ~"Conflicts Between the Commander in Chief and Congress: Concurrent Power over the Conduct of War," Ohio State Law Journal, Vol 69, p 391, 2008, http://moritzlaw.osu.edu/students/groups/oslj/files/2012/04/69.3.lobel_.pdf~~cs So too, the congressional power to declare or authorize war has been long held AND decisively ejected from Kuwait, a limitation recognized by President Bush himself.64
And, this is not a reason to reject us:
1) There’s no in-round abuse – and we have a solvency advocate and pass the one-card test 2) Good is good enough – our interpretation provides predictable limits and fair ground,– "best interpretation" is a myth since marginal differences in limits and ground are subjective and outweighed by the loss in aff predictability and substantive crowd-out
Race
A2: Pre-empts
What is a pre-empt? We defended the state and didn’t mention racism – doesn’t prove a link.
Wiki makes pre-empts inevitable
3. Their vague indicts of our authors is exactly why the alt can’t solve
Martyn Hammersley, September 1993, British Journal of Sociology, "Research and anti-racism: the case of Peter foster and his critics", 44.3, JSTOR
The second view I want to consider is sometimes associated with versions of the first AND people have privileged access to knowledge while others are blinded by ideology.20
Global Uniqueness – Racism Down
The empirical evidence proves that racism is down – unconscious racism isn’t up either
Blanton 8 – Hart, Professor of Psychology at Texas A26M, with James Jaccard ~"Unconscious Racism: A concept in Pursuit of a Measure," http://people.tamu.edu/~~bortfeld/Blanton26Jaccard_ACR2008.pdf~~cn There are indications that the landscape of racism in the United States is changing. AND expanded to include ethnocentrism, sexism, and most other forms of intolerance.
No Root Cause – A2: Racism
Racism is not the root cause of war
Martin 90 – Brian, Professor at the University of Wollongong ~Uprooting War, http://www.uow.edu.au/arts/sts/bmartin/pubs/90uw/index.html~~cn Racism has been a major factor in many wars, and also has motivated a AND alternative hierarchies, but rather to reorganise social life in an egalitarian way.
Link
The link is a joke – read our plan texts
A2: No Value to Life – 2AC
Value to life is subjective – it exists as long as people are alive
Paterson 3 – Craig, Ph.D., Director of BioEthic World "A Life Not Worth Living?" Studies in Christian Ethics, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 1-20 Appeals to a thoroughgoing quality assessment of life’s worth can be further demonstrated by mentioning AND to de facto self-assessment for the further determination of meaningful value.
And, death can’t be preferred because it ends the opportunity to improve, and we don’t know what it is
Util
Perm
Perm do the plan and all non-competitive parts of the alternative
The plan’s methodology and the perm are superior – only a globalist approach overcomes essentializing contradictions that prop up white supremacy
Adeleke 2 – Tunde, Professor of African American Studies, U-Montana ~Globalization And the Challenges of Race-based Pedagogy, http://globalization.icaap.org/content/v2.2/adeleke.html~~cn The need for a distinct black pedagogy and epistemology seems justifiable within American society and AND recreates and repackages the myths "created and developed in the old order."
The aff is a n/b to the perm – ignoring the state makes it’s violence and the aff’s impacts inevitable
1AC Isaac card – moral actions often have bad consequences – intentions are immeasurable but outcomes aren’t – default to consequentialism
AT: Ontological Blackness
Their ontological framing of blackness dooms the alternative. Placing Blackness as oppositional denies it any existence independent of white supremacy and makes identity reliant on oppression
Pinn 4 – Macalester College Professor of Religious Studies (Anthony, Dialog: A Journal of Theology, Volume 43, Number 1, Spring 2004, ’’’Black Is, Black Ain’t’’: Victor Anderson, African American Theological Thought, and Identity’, pg.57-58, Wiley online Library)
This connection between ontological blackness and religion is natural because: ’’ontological blackness signifies AND longer needing to surrender personal interests for the sake of monolithic collective status.
CP destroys legitimacy and sets precedent for future failure
Wittes 9 – Benjamin, senior fellow and research director in public law at the Brookings Institution, Stuart Taylor, an American journalist, graduated from Princeton University and Harvard Law School ~"Legislating the War on Terror: An Agenda for Reform", November 3, Book, p. 329-330~gw While President Obama’s policy makes a clean break with the Bush record, it actually AND past without giving up what the United States will need in the future.
Only Congress can create an NSC – 1AC Lunday ev
Future presidents prevent solvency
Harvard Law Review 12 "Developments in the Law: Presidential Authority," Vol. 125:2057, www.harvardlawreview.org/media/pdf/vol125_devo.pdf The recent history of signing statements demonstrates how public opinion can effectively check presidential expansions AND practices. 147 Only time, and perhaps public opinion, will tell.
Agent PICs are a voting issue – steal the entire plan function, trade off with substantive debates, are infinitely regressive, and aren’t well-grounded in the literature
PTX
Iran doesn’t have the motive or capacity to be aggressive
Kaye 9 – Dalia, senior political scientist, RAND, CFR member and former prof at George Wash, PhD in pol sci from UC Berkeley; Nora Bensahel,adjunct prof of IR at Georgetown, PhD in pol sci from Stanford; Jerrold D. Green, research professor, USC, PhD in pol sci from U Chicago; Frederic Wehrey, Senior analyst at RAND, Former Georgetown prof. D.Phil. candidate in IR, Oxford, Master’s in near Eastern studies, Princeton ~Dangerous But Not Omnipotent, Report by RAND for the Airforce and DOD, http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monographs/2009/RAND_MG781.pdf~~sr To accurately gauge the strategic challenges from Iran over a ten to fifteen-year AND , ties to Islamist groups, and ability to influence Arab public opinion.
Sanctions are inevitable – huge bipartisan support
Morning Star 6 ~Jan 13, Lexis~ Peace campaigners warned yesterday that the world faces a renewed threat of "all- AND world war - and even, possibly, all-out nuclear war.
A2: Ikenberry CP
Perm do the plan and all permutations of the planks
Perm do the plan and all the plans
We’re reading the newest Ikenberry ev – prefer ours
US has to be legitimacy for it to lead this institutions that cp creates
2ac terror
Terrorism isn’t an existential threat
Fettweis 10 – Christopher, assistant professor of national security affairs at the U.S. Naval War College 2010, Threat and Anxiety in US Foreign Policy’, Survival, 52:2 Even terrorists equipped with nuclear, biological or chemical weapons would be incapable of causing AND unpleasant as such events would be, they do not represent existential threats.
Cred matters more than flexibility
Schwarz 7 – Frederick, Senior counsel at the NYU School of Law ~Unchecked and Unbalanced: Presidential Power in a Time of Terror, p. 201~cs The Administration insists that its plunge into torture, its lawless spying, and its AND alienate our allies and corrode the vitality of the world’s oldest democracy.5
Ending detention undermines recruitment and support – that outweighs any link turn
Walt 7/26 – Stephen, Robert and Renee Belfer professor of international relations at Harvard University ~http://walt.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2013/07/26/our_one_sided_war_on_terror~~gw After the 9/11 attacks, the United States quickly declared a "war AND to convince a potential recruit to join up? The answer is no.
2AC—China
Relations are resilient – multiple reasons
Scobell 12 – Andrew Scobell is Senior Political Scientist at the RAND Corporation, and Andrew J. Nathan is Class of 1919 Professor of Political Science at Columbia University ~http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/138009/andrew-j-nathan-and-andrew-scobell/how-china-sees-america~~gw Despite these views, mainstream Chinese strategists do not advise China to challenge the United AND for cooperation. Fear of each other keeps alive the imperative to work together
. In the long run, however, the better alternative for both China and AND stability, and open economic competition-do not threaten China’s security. .
Obama won’ exercise human rights pressure
Hurst 2009 Steven R., Associated Press. "Advocates Fear Obama Is Easing U.S. Human Rights Stand." Friday, March 13, 2009. http://www.cnsnews.com/Public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=44981 Advocates fear the Obama administration may be putting the human rights issue on the back AND Trade and security should not be promoted at the expense of human rights."
Doesn’t take out either advantage – Geneva is a simple trial/no trial question (That’s Murphy), not any human rights and Legitimacy is based on legality of institutions not human rights cred (That’s Welsh and Sumasy)
No war with China
Friedberg 5 – Professor of Politics and International Affairs at Princeton, Deputy Asst for National Security Affairs and Director of Policy Planning in the Office of the Vice Pres ~Fall 2005, International Security, Vol. 30, No. 2, p.7-45~job Fortunately, a number of the factors to which the optimists point seem likely to AND were not accompanied immediately by more profound and far-reaching domestic political reforms
Closing Guantanamo brings the US in accordance with EU accords—strengthening relations
Groothuis and Niemann 12—Marga, asst prof of constitutional law @ Leidan University; Arne, prof of international politics @ University of Mainz ~http://www.politik.uni-mainz.de/cms/Dateien/mpiep03.pdf~~ab Centrality of the norms in the EU-US relationship Next, it is necessary AND and humanitarian law principles in the pursuit of its "war on terror".
Currently struggling relations are key to solving a multitude of regional conflicts—all likely to go global—aff solves the internal link to every impact
Tournament: GSU | Round: 5 | Opponent: NYU DeDe | Judge: Fitzmier, Daniel Advantage Empirics prove – six years of negotiations didn’t save the BWC Kahn 11 – Lauren, Bulletin special issue on the Biological Weapons Convention Review Conference May 9, http://www.thebulletin.org/web-edition/columnists/laura-h-kahn/the-biological-weapons-convention-proceeding-without-verificatiocs The BWC's lack of a verification protocol (agreed ways in which treaty compliance can AND . Some concluded PDF that the protocol had been doomed from the start. BWC doesn’t solve co’op – Article X created NAM vs. Western divides Bansak 11 – Kirk, Arms Control Association (origin of the BWC) Jan/Feb 2011, http://www.armscontrol.org/act/2011_01-02/BWCReviewcs During statements at the December meeting, many delegations announced preliminary positions on major issues AND whether this will be one of the NAM’s objectives for the review conference. No co’op until countries agree on verification Bansak 11 – Kirk, Arms Control Association (origin of the BWC) Jan/Feb 2011, http://www.armscontrol.org/act/2011_01-02/BWCReviewcs Verification remains a hot-button issue and was addressed in several opening statements at AND whether there will be follow-through based on it,” he said. Warming is overall worse for ag EDF 9 – Environmental Defense Fund Jan 13, “Global Warming Myths and Facts,” http://www.edf.org/page.cfm?tagID=1011cn Any beneficial effects will be far outweighed by damage and disruption. Even a warming AND Less developed countries and natural ecosystems may not have the capacity to adapt. Food wars are a myth – there’s zero empirical evidence Salehyan 7 – Idean, Professor of Political Science at the University of North Texas Aug 14, “The New Myth About Climate Change,” Foreign Policy, http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=3922js First, aside from a few anecdotes, there is little systematic empirical evidence that AND there is much more to armed conflict than resource scarcity and natural disasters. Warming skeptics are WAY less qualified – scientific consensus is overwhelmingly on our side Kaiser 10 – Tiffany, writer for Daily Tech Jun 28, http://www.dailytech.com/Stanford+Study+Few+Experts+Support+Global+Warming+Skepticism/article18863.htmcn Stanford University recently conducted a study that shows a minimal number of scientists who do AND said. "All of the incentives in science are exactly the opposite." There is no debate among scientists – warming is happening and anthropogenic EDF 9 – Environmental Defense Fund Jan 13, “Global Warming Myths and Facts,” http://www.edf.org/page.cfm?tagID=1011cn FACT: There is no debate among scientists about the basic facts of global warming AND of Science Academies: Global Response to Climate Change PDF, 2005)
Solvency We win the I/L to terror Roberts 11 – Rodney, Associate Professor of Philosophy at East Carolina University “Utilitarianism and the Morality of Indefinite Detention”, Criminal Justice Ethics, Vol. 30, No. 1cs Finally, ‘‘there is no evidence that preventive detention works. Comparative studies of AND can be selfdefeating*it may increase the likelihood of future attacks.31
A2: Psychoanalysis K 1AC Owen Perm do both Perm do the cp Lack of falsifiability warrants rejection of their link and impact claims Wade 6 – Andrew, mathematician, scientist http://scienceblogs/com/goodmath/2006/06/the_problem_with_irreducibly_c_1.php,az Falsifiability is a subtle matter. Many of the theories I was taught in physics AND necessary for a theory to be at all useful in the first place. Psychoanalysis is inaccurate and locks in the logic of the status quo Gordon 1 – Paul, psychotherapist “Psychoanalysis and Racism: The politics of defeat,” http://rac.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/42/4/17.pdfcn The postmodernists' problem is that they cannot live with dis- appointment. All the AND the world, not just to interpret it, need to look elsewhere. Doesn’t turn the aff – desire and deeper psychological factors aren’t the root cause of nuclear risks, and more importantly policymakers refuse to believe they are Blight 87 – James, cognitive psychologist, professor of international relations at Brown “Toward a Policy-Relevant Psychology of Avoiding Nuclear War,” American psychologist, Vol 42, issue 1cn What needs to be noticed first and appreciated about these formulations of Osgood and Schelling AND , psychologically completely unreal, to those who actually manage the nuclear risks. Psychoanalytic political theory is tautological – it’s useless for political analysis Gordon 1 – Paul, psychotherapist “Psychoanalysis and Racism: The politics of defeat,” http://rac.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/42/4/17.pdfcn The problem with the application of psychoanalysis to social institu- tions is that there AND Home Alone is pressed into service as a story about `racial' invasion. The neg must disprove the factual claims of the 1AC Yudowsky 6 – Eliezer, Fellow and Director, Singularity Institute for AI Research Aug 31, http://www.singinst.org/ourresearch/publications/cognitive-biases.pdfcn Robert Pirsig said: "The world's biggest fool can say the sun is shining AND real-world assertions. Do not take your eye off the ball. Our approach to environment impacts is key to engaging the state and motivating common action JL Schatz 12 (this article was written by the director of debate at Binghamton University, The Importance of Apocalypse: The Value of End Of The World Politics While Advancing Ecocriticism, Journal of Ecocriticism 4(2) July 2012joe) It is no longer a question that human interaction with the world is destroying the AND the evolution of successful tactics that can slow the pace of environmental destruction. A2: Executive CP – 2AC Frontline Perm: Do Both Perm: Do the CP – CPs should compete BOTH functionally and textually – key to check CPs that steal 100 of the aff XO puts a personal stamp on a policy which causes blame to fall on the President Rodgers 1 – Professor of Law, University of Washington Journal of Land, Resources, and Environmental Law, LEXIScn The downside of the executive order's capacity for decisive declaration is that it offers a AND that was the motivation for President Nixon's National Industrial Pollution Control Council. 37 PDDs are just a specific type of XO – all our aff ans still apply Jeffrey Fox 2008 Ph.D., Professor of Political Science at Catawba College, Acc. Aug 17, 2011, http://thisnation.com/ question/040.html Executive Orders (EOs) are legally binding orders given by the President, acting AND effect but they have the same legal weight as laws passed by Congress. Executive detention schemes fail Pearlstein 9 – Deborah N., lecturer in public and international affairs, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs July, "Form and Function in the National Security Constitution," Connecticut Law Review, 41 Conn. L. Rev. 1549cs A. Unitary Executive Detention¶ In theory, a detention scheme involving only the AND that help to mitigate errors associated with "emergency" decision- making. Congress key to democratic legitimacy and preventing future vacillation in executive policy Wittes 9 – Benjamin, senior fellow and research director in public law at the Brookings Institution, Stuart Taylor, an American journalist, graduated from Princeton University and Harvard Law School “Legislating the War on Terror: An Agenda for Reform”, November 3, Book, p. 329-330gw While President Obama’s policy makes a clean break with the Bush record, it actually AND past without giving up what the United States will need in the future. Only Congress can create an NSC NSCs are key – only trials in federal courts give the process legitimacy – that’s (*) Future presidents prevent solvency Harvard Law Review 12 "Developments in the Law: Presidential Authority," Vol. 125:2057, www.harvardlawreview.org/media/pdf/vol125_devo.pdf The recent history of signing statements demonstrates how public opinion can effectively check presidential expansions AND practices. 147 Only time, and perhaps public opinion, will tell. Agent PICs are a voting issue – steal the entire plan function, trade off with substantive debates, are infinitely regressive, and aren’t well-grounded in the literature Court will roll back the CP Cooper 2 – Phillip, Professor of Public Administration @ Portland State University By Order of the President: The Use and Abuse of Executive Direct Action” pg..77cn Despite the apparent deference by the judiciary to the president's orders, this chapter has AND the validity of orders and with addressing the consequences of admittedly legitimate decrees. A2: Prez Powers DA – 2AC No econ impact Jervis 11 – Robert, Professor in the Department of Political Science and School of International and Public Affairs at Columbia Dec, “Force in Our Times,” Survival, Vol. 25, No. 4, p. 403-425cs Even if war is still seen as evil, the security community could be dissolved AND times bring about greater economic conflict, it will not make war thinkable. Aff is the key I/L to hotspot de-escalation – Institutional credibility is key to influencing allies decision Syria tanked resolve Cordseman 13 – Anthony, Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) in Washington, D.C. 9/1, “President Obama and Syria: The ‘Waiting for Godot’ Strategy,” http://csis.org/publication/president-obama-and-syria-waiting-godot-strategycs Instead, the Administration first rushed into the kind of rhetoric you only use if AND to return for its holiday. The message to the world is obvious. Oversight doesn’t determine flexibility---tech, elusive enemies and personnel outweigh Holmes 9 – Stephen, Walter E. Meyer Professor of Law, New York University School of Law “The Brennan Center Jorde Symposium on Constitutional Law: In Case of Emergency: Misunderstanding Tradeoffs in the War on Terror”, April, California Law Review, 97 Calif. L. Rev. 301, Lexiscs Even if the promoters of unfettered executive power were justified in associating legal rules with AND is the fruit of wishful thinking is the least that might be said. No link – NSC preserves enough executive flexibility McCarthy and Velshi 9 – Andrew, Director of the Center for Law and Counterterrorism at the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies and Alykhan, attorney at the Center for Law and Counterterrorism Aug. 20, “Outsourcing American Law,” AEI Working Paper, http://www.aei.org/files/2009/08/20/20090820-Chapter6.pdfcs What is an asset in the criminal justice system, however, would be a AND be at liberty to create new entitlements by analogizing to ordinary criminal proceedings. Their impact evidence is describing the SQ Joffe 13 – Josef, WSJ Exploiting Obama's Foreign Policy Retreatcs "We are extremely disappointed," the White House press secretary said after Moscow granted AND in the Middle East has been a top American priority since the 1970s. and Imperial Japan. In our time, it is second-rate powers like Russia and Iran, and non-nations like Hezbollah, that are taking on the United States, and they do so because they can.
Not saying others need rule of law – we just need to get ours up to be a legit leader – no imposition on others – net good
Critical legal philosophy can’t explain the world – default to our experts
Stick 86 – John, Assistant Professor of Law at Tulane University School of Law ~"Can Nihilism Be Pragmatic?", Harvard Law Review, Vol. 100, No. 2 (Dec., 1986), pp. 332-401, JSTOR~cs This Article examines the relationship between the critical legal nihilists and the philosophers they rely AND a fortiori Singer is too much of an irrationalist for the others. 18
Ontopolitics
Framework – 2AC
The role of the ballot is to determine whether hypothetical implementation of the plan is superior to a competitive, reciprocal alternative or the status quo.
1) Ground – non-resolutional frameworks are unpredictable, self-serving, and moot the 1AC
2) Education – they disincentivize topic-specific research and clash, and preclude important discussions about the details of policy
And, aff choice solves their offense
Owen – We don’t have to know the underlying structure
A2: Biopower K – 2AC ALT Frontline
Rejecting the aff doesn’t solve their impacts, and you should hold the alt to reciprocal fiat power – otherwise it destroys our ability to generate offense
Biopower is inevitable and inescapable
Dula 1 – Peter, Historic Peace Churches Consultation, Bienenberg, Switzerland ~http://www.peacetheology.org/papers/dula.html~~cn Global capital operates on all registers of the social order. It is the pinnacle AND more elusive than Hardt and Negri’s condemnation (or Falk’s approval) suggests.
If the alt solves the status quo, it can overcome any residual link to the plan
Biopolitics can be positive or negative and aren’t the overriding root cause of political problems
Lemke 9 – Thomas, M.A. (Political Science, Sociology, 26 Law) ~http://www.thomaslemkeweb.de/engl.20texte/A20Zone3.pdf~~cn By concentrating on questions of law and the figure of the sovereign ban, Agamben AND mechanisms operating beneath or beyond the law (see also Bröckling 2003).7
Only governmental change solves quickly and durably
Milbrath 96 – Lester W., Professor Emeritus of Political Science and Sociology at SUNY Buffalo ~Building Sustainable Societies, p. 289~cn In some respects personal change cannot be separated from societal change. Societal transformation will AND must, pleading with individuals to change is not likely to be effective.
A2: Biopower K – 2AC LINK Frontline
Perm: Do the plan and all parts of the alt that don’t explicitly reject it
If the alt solves the status quo, it can overcome any residual link to the plan
The plan utilizes the tension between freedom and power to produce a strategic reversal – solves their impact without sacrificing good forms of biopower
Campbell 98 – David, professor of international politics at the University of Newcastle ~"Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity," pg. 204-205~cn Recognizing the possibility of rearticulating danger leads us to a final question: what modes AND , it establishes as political the very terms through which identity is articulated."
We lead to better lives for these people – if we win the progressivism debate you should default aff
A2: Biopower K – 2AC IMPACT Frontline
No risk of mass murder – biopower in democracies checks totalitarianism – turns their impact
Dickinson 4 – Edward Ross, Ph.D., Professor of History at UC Berkeley ~"Biopolitics, Fascism, Democracy: Some Reflections on Our Discourse About "Modernity," Central European History, vol. 37, no. 1, 1–48~cn In short, the continuities between early twentieth-century biopolitical discourse and the practices AND of biopolitics, the only end point of the logic of social engineering.
Case turns the K – states of emergency and ramped up surveillance only occur during crises and wars
And, violence outweighs biopower
Bevir 99 – Mark, Reader in Political Theory @ U. Newcastle ~Feb, Political Theory~cn Perhaps we might say, therefore, that power or pastoral-power recognises the AND i.e., that which constitutes the very matter of ethics."32
Biopower has existed for centuries and shows up in millions of different ways– proves they have no impact or threshhold
The impact is non-intrinsic – the U.S. can do the plan and not exterminate its population, etc.
Biopolitics check state power and increase life’s value
Parry 5 – John T., professor at Lewis 26 Clark Law School ~Winter, 9 Lewis 26 Clark L. Rev. 853, LEXIS~cn My basic assertions are that the ills laid at the feet of biopolitics are not AND Beyond that, and what the future will bring, who can say?
Biopower Good – Care/Altruism
Biopower leads to social responsibility, altruism, and pacifism
Handgraaf et al 8 – Department of Work and Organizational Psychology, University of Amsterdam ~"Less Power or Powerless," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 95, No. 5, 1136–1149~cn "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely." Lord Acton ( AND and they refrain from aggression toward others (Doob 26 Gross, 1968).
Global Uniqueness – Violence Down
Structural violence is declining
Pinker 11 – Steven, professor of psychology at Harvard, ~The Better Angels of our Nature, October, google books~cs This book is about what may be the most important thing that has ever happened AND terms of psychology and history: how human minds deal with changing circumstances.
Global violence of all kinds has been rapidly decreasing since the onset of modern civilization
Pinker 7 – Steven, Professor of Psychology at Harvard ~Mar 28, "a history of violence" eduge: The third culture~cn In sixteenth-century Paris, a popular form of entertainment was cat-burning AND our behavior can sink, not of how high our standards have risen.
A2: No Value to Life – 2AC
Value to life is subjective – it exists as long as people are alive
Paterson 3 – Craig, Ph.D., Director of BioEthic World "A Life Not Worth Living?" Studies in Christian Ethics, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 1-20 Appeals to a thoroughgoing quality assessment of life’s worth can be further demonstrated by mentioning AND to de facto self-assessment for the further determination of meaningful value.
And, death can’t be preferred because it ends the opportunity to improve, and we don’t know what it is
A2: Root Cause – 2AC
"Root cause" isn’t offense – we still solve the short-term proximate causes
And, "root cause" arguments are inaccurate and dangerous – combining strategies is key
Martin 90 – Brian, Professor at the University of Wollongong ~Uprooting War, http://www.uow.edu.au/arts/sts/bmartin/pubs/90uw/index.html~~cn War does not have a single root In this chapter and in the six preceding AND the roots of war and developing strategies for grassroots movements to uproot them.
Util Good – 2AC
Extend Isaac – Util comes first – people with good intentions make terrible decisions – arbitrary way to decide ethics
Rights Good – 2AC
Rights are key to challenging the State – any "exceptions" are just a reason to promote them further
Our experts know what’s up – Fitzsimmons says history is on our side – experts typically make more accurate predictions of risk – cross-ex proves we have experts
Link Debate
Perm do both
Perm do the plan and all non-competitive parts of the alt
Impact Debate
Empiricism Good EXT
Their strategy trades empirical arguments for philosophical principles – this is the logic of the Bush administration, which led to the Iraq war and environmental destruction
Noah 4 – Timothy, senior writer for Slate magazine, contributing editor to The Washington Monthly ~Mar 16, http://www.slate.com/id/2097268~~cn "Facts are stupid things," President Ronald Reagan said in a famous self- AND empirical fact? The ignoramus has reasons that the wonk knows not of.
Calculations Good – 2AC
Refusing to calculate is a calculation itself that uses the same cost-benefit analysis
If we don’t calculate, the State will – only our stance affirms human dignity and difference
Wood 6 – David, Professor of Philosophy at Vanderbilt University ~Ón Being Haunted by the Future," Research in Phenomenology, Volume 36, Number 1, 2006 , pp. 274-298(25)~cn From an unexpected source, I would cite here the work of Peter Singer, AND the other side of calculation, but is already intimately involved in it.
Scenario Planning Good
The alternatives are worse – scenario planning is key to point out real risks and hold policymakers accountable
Tetlock 9 – Philip, Professor at the University of California, Berkeley ~Aug 25, http://www.nationalinterest.org/Article.aspx?id=22040~~cn The very title of their book gives a sense of their intellectual predilections. We AND its rhetorical force when we use historical analogies in a more nuanced fashion.
Scenario planning points out and undermines dangerous status quo assumptions
Randall 26 Ertel 5 – Doug 26 Chris, co-leaders of the consulting practice at Global Business Network ~"Moving beyond the official future," http://www.gbn.com/articles/pdfs/GBN_beyond20the20official20future.pdf~~cn Scenario thinking exercises generally begin with a rigorous fact-finding phase, where the AND they are not fully accounting for the risks and opportunities their companies face.
Scenario planning provides an accurate account of what lies ahead – it’s key to challenging apathy and sparking change before it’s too late
Turner 8 – Nick, co-president of Global Business Network; former Managing Director and Head of Strategy in Europe at Morgan Stanley ~Oct, http://www.gbn.com/articles/pdfs/GBN_Futureproofing.CEO20j.pdf~~cn Given the accelerating rate and breadth of change, the world is likely to become AND executives better contextual awareness, clarity, and confidence to make decisions today.
Extinction Scenario Planning Good
Scenario planning with extinction impact scenarios spurs people to create solutions to prevent extinction – empirically proven
Terdiman 8 – Daniel, writer for CNET News ~Oct 28, http://news.cnet.com/8301-13772_3-10076796-52.html~~cn If you knew the human race was facing imminent extinction, what would you do AND "It was serious, and reflects what people are thinking about today."
Worst-Case Scenario Planning Good
Often, the worst-case is the actual-case scenario – failure to take these scenarios seriously makes horrible disasters inevitable
Leonhardt 10 – David, economics columnist and a staff writer for The New York Times ~May 31, http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/06/magazine/06fob-wwln-t.html~~cn Much of this indifference stemmed from an obsession with profits, come what may. AND only natural to have this hope. But that doesn’t make it wise.
Worst-case scenario planning breaks status quo apathy and gives meaning to life – empirically proven
Ogilvy 3 – James, author; cofounded Global Business Network ~"What Strategists Can Learn from Sartre," http://www.gbn.com/articles/pdfs/Strategists20and20Sartre.pdf~~cn Scenario planning is not the only tool of the existential strategist, but it is AND can do for companies what a Tiger Woods tape can do for golfers.
Dystopian futurism is key to shatter complacency with the existing order
Kurasawa 4 – Fuyuki, Associate Professor of Sociology at York University ~"Cautionary Tales: The Global Culture of Prevention and the Work of Foresight", Constellations, 11(4)~cn NGOs and social movements active in global civil society have drawn upon the moral imagination AND unsustainable, the appeal to reason represents another main trigger of intergenerational solidarity.
Worst-case scenario planning gives a clear vision of what we can change and shatters apathy
Scearce 1 – Diana, the Global Business Network community ~"WHAT IF? THE ART OF SCENARIO THINKING FOR NONPROFITS," with Katherine Fulton, http://www.gbn.com/articles/pdfs/GBN_What20If.pdf~~cn Scenario thinking can be used to get your organization unstuck and catalyze action. It AND cannot influence, and to take action—on their own and collectively.
Alt
Scenario Planning
Inevitable===
C
Scenario planning is inevitable – better to use it calmly now than irrationally during a real emergency
Ogilvy 3 – James, author; cofounded Global Business Network ~"What Strategists Can Learn from Sartre," http://www.gbn.com/articles/pdfs/Strategists20and20Sartre.pdf~~cn Such punctuations call for strategies developed prior to the moment of urgency. And as AND prefer. (See "How Scenario Planning Explains Uncertainty," page 5.)
Delib
They deliberate less – Rejecting the aff alone is mental masturbation – that’s apolitical and allows the right to fill in, that’s the 1AC Barbook evidence
2/25/14
2AC Round 6 Shirley
Tournament: Shirley | Round: 6 | Opponent: Florida Frank-Prescott | Judge: White T
W/M – courts to try detainees exist NOW, they’re just out of the military, we make them more stringent by making them out of article III
C/I – Increase doesn’t require pre-existence.
Stephen Reinhardt, 2005, U.S. Judge for the United States Court of Appeals for the ninth circuit, Reynolds and Rausch v. Hartford Financial Services Group, inc, Lexis Nexis Specifically, we must decide whether charging a higher price for initial insurance than the AND which a company raises the rate that an individual has previously been charged.
C/I – To make greater.
Random House, 2011, Dictionary.com Unabridged Based on the Random House Dictionary –verb (used with object) 1. to make greater, as in number, size, strength, or quality; augment; add to
No ground loss – all links to current courts apply to our
No unlimit – still have to reduce his war powers
Not a reason to reject us – competing interps is a myth since judge intervention is inevitable in T
Solvency – A2: Circumvention – 2AC
Extend 1AC Lunday ev – Obama can’t circumvent because district court repeals check and won’t circumvent because Goldilocks nature of an NSC
Obama believes he is constrained by statute – won’t circumvent
Prakash 12 – Saikrishna, professor of Law at UVA ~Feburary, "The Goldilocks Executive" Feb~cs We accept that the President’s lawyers search for legal arguments to justify presidential action, AND of law would trigger censure from Congress, courts, and the public. A2: Transfers
Doesn’t solve ANY OF THE AFF – it’s about our institutions – that’s literally every card in the 1ac – key to create institutional support – means the aff is a n/b to perm
Still links to all other off case b/c same mechanism
No war with China
Friedberg 5 – Professor of Politics and International Affairs at Princeton, Deputy Asst for National Security Affairs and Director of Policy Planning in the Office of the Vice Pres ~Fall 2005, International Security, Vol. 30, No. 2, p.7-45~job Fortunately, a number of the factors to which the optimists point seem likely to AND were not accompanied immediately by more profound and far-reaching domestic political reforms
Closing Guantanamo brings the US in accordance with EU accords—strengthening relations
Groothuis and Niemann 12—Marga, asst prof of constitutional law @ Leidan University; Arne, prof of international politics @ University of Mainz ~http://www.politik.uni-mainz.de/cms/Dateien/mpiep03.pdf~~ab Centrality of the norms in the EU-US relationship Next, it is necessary AND and humanitarian law principles in the pursuit of its "war on terror".
Currently struggling relations are key to solving a multitude of regional conflicts—all likely to go global—aff solves the internal link to every impact
Stivachtis 10—Yannis, director of the International Studies Program @ Virginia Tech ~http://www.rieas.gr/research-areas/global-issues/transatlantic-studies/78.html~~ab There is no doubt that US-European relations are in a period of transition AND of threats is clearly perceived by publics on both sides of the Atlantic. A2: Biopower K – 2AC ALT Frontline
Rejecting the aff doesn’t solve their impacts, and you should hold the alt to reciprocal fiat power – otherwise it destroys our ability to generate offense
Biopower is inevitable and inescapable
Dula 1 – Peter, Historic Peace Churches Consultation, Bienenberg, Switzerland ~http://www.peacetheology.org/papers/dula.html~~cn Global capital operates on all registers of the social order. It is the pinnacle AND more elusive than Hardt and Negri’s condemnation (or Falk’s approval) suggests.
If the alt solves the status quo, it can overcome any residual link to the plan
Biopolitics can be positive or negative and aren’t the overriding root cause of political problems
Lemke 9 – Thomas, M.A. (Political Science, Sociology, 26 Law) ~http://www.thomaslemkeweb.de/engl.20texte/A20Zone3.pdf~~cn By concentrating on questions of law and the figure of the sovereign ban, Agamben AND mechanisms operating beneath or beyond the law (see also Bröckling 2003).7
~INSERT SPECIFIC ALT ANSWERS~
A2: Biopower K – 2AC IMPACT Frontline
No risk of mass murder – biopower in democracies checks totalitarianism – turns their impact
Dickinson 4 – Edward Ross, Ph.D., Professor of History at UC Berkeley ~"Biopolitics, Fascism, Democracy: Some Reflections on Our Discourse About "Modernity," Central European History, vol. 37, no. 1, 1–48~cn In short, the continuities between early twentieth-century biopolitical discourse and the practices AND of biopolitics, the only end point of the logic of social engineering.
Case turns the K – states of emergency and ramped up surveillance only occur during crises and wars
And, violence outweighs biopower
Bevir 99 – Mark, Reader in Political Theory @ U. Newcastle ~Feb, Political Theory~cn Perhaps we might say, therefore, that power or pastoral-power recognises the AND i.e., that which constitutes the very matter of ethics."32
Biopower has existed for centuries and shows up in millions of different ways– proves they have no impact or threshhold
The impact is non-intrinsic – the U.S. can do the plan and not exterminate its population, etc.
Biopolitics check state power and increase life’s value
Parry 5 – John T., professor at Lewis 26 Clark Law School ~Winter, 9 Lewis 26 Clark L. Rev. 853, LEXIS~cn My basic assertions are that the ills laid at the feet of biopolitics are not AND Beyond that, and what the future will bring, who can say? A2: Biopower K – 2AC LINK Frontline
Perm: Do the plan and all parts of the alt that don’t explicitly reject it
If the alt solves the status quo, it can overcome any residual link to the plan
The plan is a key jumping off point for the K
Dochterman 5 – Zen, Ph.D. Student in Comparative Literature at UCLA ~Aporia Journal, Online~cn Our first effort must be to insist on the normalcy of this world. This AND already, in a spectral and soon-to-be realized form.
The plan utilizes the tension between freedom and power to produce a strategic reversal – solves their impact without sacrificing good forms of biopower
Campbell 98 – David, professor of international politics at the University of Newcastle ~"Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity," pg. 204-205~cn Recognizing the possibility of rearticulating danger leads us to a final question: what modes AND , it establishes as political the very terms through which identity is articulated." 2AC – Reverse Immigration
Boehner’s all talk—it’ll pass now
Ball 11/14—Molly, The Atlantic ~www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2013/11/chuck-schumer-would-still-put-quite-a-bit-of-money-on-immigration-reform/281490/~ab The conventional wisdom for months now has been that immigration reform is dead. Yet AND said. "They’re damned if they do, damned if they don’t."
The White House is pushing for immigration now—only a risk Boehner stands his ground
Military sees the plan as a good-faith effort to repair their image – boosts CMR
Joyner 8—James, Managing Editor of the Atlantic Council since September 2007 and editor of Outside The Beltway since January 2003.He has published dozens of columns for publications including The Atlantic, Foreign Policy, The National Interest, CNN, Politico, Reason,Legal Affairs, Human Events, Washington Examiner, The New Individualist, and TCS Daily and is a regular commentator on world affairs on venues including BBC, NPR, C-SPAN, Al Jazeera, CNN, and MSNBC ~1/14/08, http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/joint_chiefs_chairman_close_guantanamo/-http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/joint_chiefs_chairman_close_guantanamo/~~ab The chief of the U.S. military said he favors closing the prison AND that ferried him to and from the detention facilities across a glistening bay.
Strong CMR key to maintaining security in the Gulf of Guinea
Forest 6—James, Professor and Director of Security Studies at the University of Massachusetts Lowell. He is also a senior fellow with the Joint Special Operations University, where he contributes to the teaching and research needs of the U.S. Special Operations Forces community ~Oil and Terrorism in the New Gulf: Framing U.S. Energy and Security Policies for the Gulf of Guinea, pg 259~ab One of the most tangible ways to improve governance in the Gulf of Guinea is AND many of the essen¬tial, but less tangible aspects of a development agenda.
Lefkowitz 13 – Jay, senior lawyer and former domestic policy advisor to President George W. ~Mar 4, Financial Times, "Drones are no substitute for detention," www.ft.com/cms/s/0/dae6552c-84c2-11e2-891d-00144feabdc0.html~23axzz2dZnIVyqb~cs Memo to all those critics of Guantánamo Bay: beware what you wish for. AND promptly administered through military courts – instead of taking the easy way out.
No drone shift link – too many external factors
Chesney 11 – Robert, Charles I. Francis Professor in Law at the UT School of Law as well as a non-resident Senior Fellow at Brookings ~Oct 17, "Examining the Evidence of a Detention-Drone Strike Tradeoff," www.lawfareblog.com/2011/10/examining-the-evidence-of-a-detention-drone-strike-tradeoff/~cs Yesterday Jack linked to this piece by Noah Feldman, which among other things advances AND detention versus targeting, but something much more complex and difficult to measure.
Bringing credibility to detention solves the shift
Whitlock 13 – Craig, Washington Post ~Jan 1, "Renditions continue under Obama, despite due-process concerns," articles.washingtonpost.com/2013-01-01/world/36323571_1_obama-administration-interrogation-drone-strikes~cs The three European men with Somali roots were arrested on a murky pretext in August AND Renditions, though controversial and complex, represent one of the few alternatives.
Their internal link is hype – other countries don’t make drone choices based on US policies – it’s too easy to get the tech
Runaway warming collapses Gulf Stream, resulting in an ice age
Kohler 9 – Rickard – Essay cited by Dr. Ferit Bingel — Middle East Technical University of Marine Sciences ~1-26, http://www.behav.org/student_essay/climate/gulf20stream_Kohler/gulf20stream_ Kohler.htm~sr Scientists today are not only concerned with global warming, but the effect it will AND those areas would become un-livable and the population would migrate southward.
10,000 year timeframe due to Earth’s precession and obliquity
Vettoretti 11 – G. Vettoretti and W.R. Peltier - Department of Physics, University of Toronto ~"The impact of insolation, greenhouse gas forcing and ocean circulation changes on glacial inception, The Holocene 21(5) 803–817 (2011)~sr The nature of the ongoing Holocene/Anthropocene transition has provided much stimulus for discussion AND a direct comparison between MIS 11 and the current interglacial would be inexact.
Impossible to predict the ice age, and past emissions solve
Tournament: GSU | Round: 7 | Opponent: Liberty BoMu | Judge: Shook, Lindsey ILaw A2: Targeted Killing Trade-Off DA – 2AC Insert Impact D Dramatic shift to drones in the SQuo Lefkowitz 13 – Jay, senior lawyer and former domestic policy advisor to President George W. Mar 4, Financial Times, "Drones are no substitute for detention,” www.ft.com/cms/s/0/dae6552c-84c2-11e2-891d-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2dZnIVyqbcs Memo to all those critics of Guantánamo Bay: beware what you wish for. AND promptly administered through military courts – instead of taking the easy way out. No drone shift link – too many external factors Chesney 11 – Robert, Charles I. Francis Professor in Law at the UT School of Law as well as a non-resident Senior Fellow at Brookings Oct 17, "Examining the Evidence of a Detention-Drone Strike Tradeoff,” www.lawfareblog.com/2011/10/examining-the-evidence-of-a-detention-drone-strike-tradeoff/cs Yesterday Jack linked to this piece by Noah Feldman, which among other things advances AND detention versus targeting, but something much more complex and difficult to measure. Turn – an easy path to legal detention solves the shift Whitlock 13 – Craig, Washington Post Jan 1, "Renditions continue under Obama, despite due-process concerns,” articles.washingtonpost.com/2013-01-01/world/36323571_1_obama-administration-interrogation-drone-strikescs The three European men with Somali roots were arrested on a murky pretext in August AND Renditions, though controversial and complex, represent one of the few alternatives. No causal link between U.S. drone preferences and others – weaponization is easy and inevitable if they want it Anderson 11 – Kenneth, Professor of International Law at American University Sept. 9, What Kind of Drones Arms Race Is Coming?” http://www.volokh.com/2011/10/09/what-kind-of-drones-arms-race-is-coming/#more-51516cs New York Times national security correspondent Scott Shane has an opinion piece in today’s Sunday AND states competing to come up with weapons technologies that are … more discriminating. K A2: Reps K’s – 2AC Framework You should weigh the implementation of the plan, and they can’t advocate it – otherwise it deprives us of our only unique offense against the K *And, education – policymakers don’t and shouldn’t operate this way Tuathail 96 – Gerard, Ph.D., Professor, Government and International Affairs Political Geography, 15(6-7), p. 664cn While theoretical debates at academic conferences are important to academics, the discourse and concerns AND needs to always be open to the patterned mess that is human history. Judge Choice – Reps are potential, not mandatory; you can vote for the plan for different justifications – it’s logical and avoids reactionary conservatism And, their internal links assume people with political power – but, reps are inherently open, and only our use can uniquely reclaim them Oscarson 3 – Christopher, with Anna Kurtz; National Council of Teachers “BookTalk: Revising the Discourse of Hate,” ProQuestcn However, Butler also argues that the daily, repeated use of words owns a AND might be able to create spaces for learning in which everyone feels safe. No Root Cause – A2: Otherization Otherization is not the root cause Volf 2 – Miroslav, Ph.D., Professor of Theology at Yale Jan 1, Journal of Ecumenical Studiecn Though “otherness”–cultural, ethnic, religious, racial difference–is an AND lay elsewhere is itself a testimony to how much “otherness” matters. A2: No Value to Life – 2AC Value to life is subjective – it exists as long as people are alive Paterson 3 – Craig, Ph.D., Director of BioEthic World "A Life Not Worth Living?" Studies in Christian Ethics, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 1-20 Appeals to a thoroughgoing quality assessment of life’s worth can be further demonstrated by mentioning AND to de facto self-assessment for the further determination of meaningful value. And, death can’t be preferred because it ends the opportunity to improve, and we don’t know what it is
State Good – 2AC Abandoning state reforms causes worse forces to fill-in Barbrook 97 – Dr. Richard, Professor of Social Sciences, University of Westminister Jun 5, http://www.nettime.org/Lists-Archives/nettime-l-9706/msg00034.htmlgw I thought that this position is clear from my remarks about the ultra-left AND can be a fun artistic pose. However, human suffering is not. Realism Framework – Realism Critical IR Whether IR is constructed or we could imagine better versions of it is irrelevant – we live in a realist world and must operate under these assumptions to solve any real problem Sorensen 98 – Georg, Ph.D., Professor, International Politics and Economics, Aarhus U “IR Theory after the cold war,” International Studies 24, p. 87-88cn What, then, are the more general problems with the extreme versions of the AND post-positivism is metatheoretically compelled to embrace any conceivable change project.28
Scenario Planning Good The alternatives are worse – scenario planning is key to point out real risks and hold policymakers accountable Tetlock 9 – Philip, Professor at the University of California, Berkeley Aug 25, http://www.nationalinterest.org/Article.aspx?id=22040cn The very title of their book gives a sense of their intellectual predilections. We AND its rhetorical force when we use historical analogies in a more nuanced fashion. A2: Security K – 2AC LINK Frontline Reps are potential, not mandatory – you can vote for the plan for non-security justifications – it’s logical and avoids reactionary conservatism Perm: Do the plan and reject the complete objectivity of security Perm: Do the plan and all parts of the alternative that don’t explicitly reject it We’re not the State – we identify REAL threats – and we have to work within this system to change it Tuathail 2k – Gearoid, Associate Professor of Political Geography at Virginia Tech Geopolitics @ Millennium, Paranoid Fantasies and Technological Fundamentalism Amidst the Contradictions of Contemporary Modernity, p. onlinecn History indicates that the everyday practice of geopolitics is often motivated and given meaning by AND paranoids, it happens, do not have a bad record at all. The perm recognizes security can be used for good and bad – this is key to achieve real change Floyd 7 – Rita, Ph.D., ESRC post-doctoral fellow “Towards a consequentialist evaluation of security,” Review of International Studies, 33, 327–350cn This article constitutes an attempted bridge-building between the so-called ‘Copenhagen AND analyst, allowing for normative – but denying infinite – conceptualisations of security. A2: Security K – 2AC A2: Security Impossible The plan just prevents a certain proximate factors from erupting into conflict – it’s not an endless quest for perfect security Securing world order is possible and not counter-productive Lieber and Alexander 5 – Keir, Professor of Political Science at Notre Dame; Gerard, Professor of Politics at U-Virginia “Waiting for Balancing: Why the World is not Pushing Back,” International Security 30.1, projectmusecn The major powers are not balancing against the United States because of the nature of AND nonetheless shared with their allies the goal of containing the Soviet Union.61 A2: Security K – 2AC IMPACT Frontline You should weigh the implementation of the aff – otherwise it deprives us of our only unique offense against the K The K is circular – means there’s no impact and no alt Floyd 7 – Rita, Ph.D., ESRC post-doctoral fellow “Towards a consequentialist evaluation of security,” Review of International Studies , 33, 327–350cn Wæver’s assertion that the two schools might be complementary is crucial, thus not only AND – depending on whether or not they are seen as positive or negative. Case turns the K – all the negative aspects of security are exacerbated during times of actual conflict Security is a self-denying prophecy – the alt ensures aggression and war Jervis 76 – Robert, professor of political science at Columbia University Perception and Misperception in International Politics, p. 84cn Spiral and deterrence theories thus contradict each other at every point. They seem to AND also because they thought the United States would allow them to attain parity. A2: Security K – 2AC A2: Root Cause “Root cause” isn’t offense – we still solve the sufficient short-term proximate causes Security is not the root cause of war Okogba 9 – Efemena, Birmingham U (U.K.) Apr 9, “Is the Security Dilemma a Cause of War?” International Security, Online The Security dilemma is operational because of the distrust that states have for each other AND as the essay has shown, there are a variety of different factors. A2: Security K – 2AC ALT Frontline Rejecting the aff doesn’t solve their impacts, and you should hold the alt to reciprocal fiat power – otherwise it destroys our ability to generate offense Realism and security are inevitable – the alt triggers great power wars Mearsheimer 1 – John J., Prof. of Political Science at U Chicago The Tragedy of Great Power Politics, pp. 1-28cn Alas, the claim that security competition and war between the great powers have been AND world as it is, not as we would like it to be. If the alt solves the status quo, it can overcome any residual link to the plan Attempts to break down threat con create global psychosis – this makes worse violence inevitable as society seeks to reestablish threats Reinhard 5 – Kenneth, Associate Professor of English and Comparative Literature at UCLA The neighbor, GoogleBooks, p. 15-17cn One problem with this account of the political, where we divide the world into AND declare war on him is to attempt to resuscitate the enemy’s failing animus. Rejecting federal reforms ensures worse forces fill-in, destroying the current battle against heteronormativity Gravel 7 – Mike, former U.S. Senator August 14, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sen-mike-gravel/hillary-chooses-states-ri_b_60351.htmlcn During last week's historic gay debate, Hillary Clinton dredged up the old states rights AND hang-ups and fight for equal rights all Americans in all states. CP A2: Executive CP – 2AC Frontline Perm: Do Both Perm: Do the CP – CPs should compete BOTH functionally and textually – key to check CPs that steal 100 of the aff XO puts a personal stamp on a policy which causes blame to fall on the President Rodgers 1 – Professor of Law, University of Washington Journal of Land, Resources, and Environmental Law, LEXIScn The downside of the executive order's capacity for decisive declaration is that it offers a AND that was the motivation for President Nixon's National Industrial Pollution Control Council. 37 Executive detention schemes fail Pearlstein 9 – Deborah N., lecturer in public and international affairs, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs July, "Form and Function in the National Security Constitution," Connecticut Law Review, 41 Conn. L. Rev. 1549cs A. Unitary Executive Detention¶ In theory, a detention scheme involving only the AND that help to mitigate errors associated with "emergency" decision- making. Congress key to democratic legitimacy and preventing future vacillation in executive policy Wittes 9 – Benjamin, senior fellow and research director in public law at the Brookings Institution, Stuart Taylor, an American journalist, graduated from Princeton University and Harvard Law School “Legislating the War on Terror: An Agenda for Reform”, November 3, Book, p. 329-330gw While President Obama’s policy makes a clean break with the Bush record, it actually AND past without giving up what the United States will need in the future. Only Congress can create an NSC NSCs are key – only trials in federal courts give the process legitimacy – that’s (*) Future presidents prevent solvency Harvard Law Review 12 "Developments in the Law: Presidential Authority," Vol. 125:2057, www.harvardlawreview.org/media/pdf/vol125_devo.pdf The recent history of signing statements demonstrates how public opinion can effectively check presidential expansions AND practices. 147 Only time, and perhaps public opinion, will tell. Agent PICs are a voting issue – steal the entire plan function, trade off with substantive debates, are infinitely regressive, and aren’t well-grounded in the literature Court will roll back the CP Cooper 2 – Phillip, Professor of Public Administration @ Portland State University By Order of the President: The Use and Abuse of Executive Direct Action” pg..77cn Despite the apparent deference by the judiciary to the president's orders, this chapter has AND the validity of orders and with addressing the consequences of admittedly legitimate decrees.
PTX Econ D – 1NC No econ impact Jervis 11 – Robert, Professor in the Department of Political Science and School of International and Public Affairs at Columbia Dec, “Force in Our Times,” Survival, Vol. 25, No. 4, p. 403-425cs Even if war is still seen as evil, the security community could be dissolved AND times bring about greater economic conflict, it will not make war thinkable. 2AC – Standard Won’t pass—neither part will negotiate Weisman 9/12—Jonathan, NYT www.nytimes.com/2013/09/13/us/politics/at-meeting-with-treasury-secretary-boehner-pressed-for-debt-ceiling-deal.htmlab WASHINGTON — With the Syrian crisis receding on Capitol Hill, Congress on Thursday plunged AND political games” and suggested that many Republicans had lost touch with reality. Water reform bills thump Tate 9/11—Curtis, Washington Bureau http://www.kansascity.com/2013/09/11/4474921/house-adds-water-infrastructure.htmlab Lawmakers in the House of Representatives introduced their version of a bill Wednesday to move AND business, including the farm bill, immigration reform and the debt limit. Congress just passed limitations of indefinite detention—non uniques the DA Alexander 13—Janet, law prof @ Stanford 3/21, illinoislawreview.org/wp-content/ilr-content/articles/2013/2/Alexander.pdfab/cs Congress also passed legislation requiring suspected members of al- Qaeda or “associated forces AND , the D.C. Circuit has since rendered those protections toothless. National Security Court would be bipart McCarthy 13 – Andrew, senior fellow at the National Review Institute and the executive director of the Philadelphia Freedom Center Feb 9, http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/340225/problems-white-paper-andrew-c-mccarthy/page/0/2cs For many years, I have argued that we need a new national-security AND executive discretion but avoids the dangerous excesses of the Justice Department white paper. Fiat solves the link – the plan just IS, and Congress like it; the Disad is a “would” question Winners win Marshall 11 – Bryan W, Miami University and Brandon C. Prins, Howard H. Baker, Jr. Center for Public Policy 2011, “Power or Posturing? Policy Availability and Congressional Influence on U.S. Presidential Decisions to Use Force”, Sept, Presidential Studies Quarterly 41, no. 3cs Presidents rely heavily on Congress in converting their political capital into real policy success. AND made with an eye toward managing political capital at home (Fordham 2002). Obama is hands off—he won’t restrict his own power—Cabinet members would take the blame Becker 12—Jo, NYT 5/29/12, http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/29/world/obamas-leadership-in-war-on-al-qaeda.html?pagewanted=alland_r=0ab Walking out of the Archives, the president turned to his national security adviser at AND Emanuel, blocked them, saying health care reform had to go first. Not Intrinsic – a logical policymaker could do the plan and not backlash against the agenda
Huq 12 – Aziz Z., Assistant Professor of Law, University of Chicago Law School ~"Binding the Executive (by Law or by Politics)", May 25, www.law.uchicago.edu/files/file/400-ah-binding.pdf~cs The Executive Unbound paints a n image of executive discretion almost or completely unbridled by AND up the statutory status quo ante play a role in delimiting executive discretion.
Legit
Policymakers act as if cred matters
Tang 5 Shiping, associate research fellow and deputy director of the Center for Regional Security Studies at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences in Beijing, January-March, "Reputation, Cult of Reputation, and International Conflict," Security Studies, Vol. 14, No. 1, p. 34-62 The problem, of course, is that politicians usually do not have such nuanced AND which hereafter will be referred to as "reputation" unless specified otherwise).
Warming is overall worse for ag
EDF 9 – Environmental Defense Fund ~Jan 13, "Global Warming Myths and Facts," http://www.edf.org/page.cfm?tagID=1011~~cn Any beneficial effects will be far outweighed by damage and disruption. Even a warming AND Less developed countries and natural ecosystems may not have the capacity to adapt.
Warming will be too fast and too intense – plants will suffer
Fertilization effects are exaggerated and our turns outweigh
Stern 7 – Nicholas, Head of the British Government Economic Service, Former Head Economist for the World Bank ~"The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review", Cambridge University Press, p. 70~cn Carbon dioxide is a basic building block for crop growth. Rising concentrations in the AND droughts intensify and critical temperature thresholds for crop production are reached more often.
A2: Security K – 2AC
Perm: Do the plan and all parts of the alternative that don’t explicitly reject it
If the alt solves the status quo, it can overcome any residual link to the plan
We’re not the State – we identify REAL threats – and we have to work within this system to change it
Tuathail 2k – Gearoid, Associate Professor of Political Geography at Virginia Tech ~Geopolitics @ Millennium, Paranoid Fantasies and Technological Fundamentalism Amidst the Contradictions of Contemporary Modernity, p. online~cn History indicates that the everyday practice of geopolitics is often motivated and given meaning by AND paranoids, it happens, do not have a bad record at all.
The perm recognizes security can be used for good and bad – this is key to achieve real change
Floyd 7 – Rita, Ph.D., ESRC post-doctoral fellow ~"Towards a consequentialist evaluation of security," Review of International Studies, 33, 327–350~cn This article constitutes an attempted bridge-building between the so-called ’Copenhagen AND analyst, allowing for normative – but denying infinite – conceptualisations of security.
The plan just prevents a certain proximate factors from erupting into conflict – it’s not an endless quest for perfect security
The ROB is the plan vs a competitive policy option – You should weigh the implementation of the aff – otherwise it deprives us of our only unique offense against the K – hold the alt to reciprocal fiat power
Our framing of warming overcomes disbelief and mobilizes public responses
Romm 12 – Joe, Ph.D. in physics from MIT, Fellow at American Progress and is the editor of Climate Progress, acting assistant secretary of energy for energy efficiency and renewable energy in 1997, Time named him a "Hero of the Environment? and "The Web’s most influential climate-change blogger." ~"Apocalypse Not: The Oscars, The Media And The Myth of ’Constant Repetition of Doomsday Messages’ on Climate", http://thinkprogress.org/romm/2012/02/26/432546/apocalypse-not-oscars-media-myth-of-repetition-of-doomsday-messages-on-climate/~~23more-432546~~cs The two greatest myths about global warming communications are 1) constant repetition of doomsday AND by most of the rest of the media, intelligentsia and popular culture.
The K is circular – means there’s no impact and no alt
Floyd 7 – Rita, Ph.D., ESRC post-doctoral fellow ~"Towards a consequentialist evaluation of security," Review of International Studies , 33, 327–350~cn Wæver’s assertion that the two schools might be complementary is crucial, thus not only AND – depending on whether or not they are seen as positive or negative.
Case turns the K – all the negative aspects of security are exacerbated during times of actual conflict
Security is a self-denying prophecy – the alt ensures aggression and war
Jervis 76 – Robert, professor of political science at Columbia University ~Perception and Misperception in International Politics, p. 84~cn Spiral and deterrence theories thus contradict each other at every point. They seem to AND also because they thought the United States would allow them to attain parity.
"Root cause" isn’t offense – we still solve the sufficient short-term proximate causes
Security is not the root cause of war
Okogba 9 – Efemena, Birmingham U (U.K.) ~Apr 9, "Is the Security Dilemma a Cause of War?" International Security, Online~ The Security dilemma is operational because of the distrust that states have for each other AND as the essay has shown, there are a variety of different factors.
Reps are potential, not mandatory – you can vote for the plan for non-security justifications – it’s logical and avoids reactionary conservatism
Attempts to break down threat con create global psychosis – this makes worse violence inevitable as society seeks to reestablish threats
Reinhard 5 – Kenneth, Associate Professor of English and Comparative Literature at UCLA ~The neighbor, GoogleBooks, p. 15-17~cn One problem with this account of the political, where we divide the world into AND declare war on him is to attempt to resuscitate the enemy’s failing animus.
Warming CP
Perm do both
Perm do the CP – must compete functionally – Ikenberry says the US could encourage countries to do this post-aff
Geo-engineering doesn’t solve our CO2 bad impacts, doesn’t alleviate warming, and independently destroys the environment
Closing Guantanamo brings the US in accordance with EU accords—strengthening relations
Groothuis and Niemann 12—Marga, asst prof of constitutional law @ Leidan University; Arne, prof of international politics @ University of Mainz ~http://www.politik.uni-mainz.de/cms/Dateien/mpiep03.pdf~~ab Centrality of the norms in the EU-US relationship Next, it is necessary AND and humanitarian law principles in the pursuit of its "war on terror".
Currently struggling relations are key to solving a multitude of regional conflicts—all likely to go global—aff solves the internal link to every impact
Iran doesn’t have the motive or capacity to be aggressive
Kaye 9 – Dalia, senior political scientist, RAND, CFR member and former prof at George Wash, PhD in pol sci from UC Berkeley; Nora Bensahel,adjunct prof of IR at Georgetown, PhD in pol sci from Stanford; Jerrold D. Green, research professor, USC, PhD in pol sci from U Chicago; Frederic Wehrey, Senior analyst at RAND, Former Georgetown prof. D.Phil. candidate in IR, Oxford, Master’s in near Eastern studies, Princeton ~Dangerous But Not Omnipotent, Report by RAND for the Airforce and DOD, http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monographs/2009/RAND_MG781.pdf~~sr To accurately gauge the strategic challenges from Iran over a ten to fifteen-year AND , ties to Islamist groups, and ability to influence Arab public opinion.
Congress just passed limitations of indefinite detention—non uniques the DA
Alexander 13—Janet, law prof @ Stanford ~3/21, illinoislawreview.org/wp-content/ilr-content/articles/2013/2/Alexander.pdf~ab/cs Congress also passed legislation requiring suspected members of al- Qaeda or "associated forces AND , the D.C. Circuit has since rendered those protections toothless.
Sanctions are inevitable – huge bipartisan support
A rational actor could do the plan and not backlash against the agenda
"Political Capital" is a myth
Hirsh, 13 — Chief correspondent for National Journal ~Michael Hirsh, Chief correspondent for National Journal; previously served as the senior editor and national economics correspondent for Newsweek, based in its Washington bureau, There’s No Such Thing as Political Capital, National Journal, February 7, 2013.~(nsb) On Tuesday, in his State of the Union address, President Obama will do AND to do with Obama’s political capital or, indeed, Obama at all.
Sanctions are key to appeasing Netanyahu – The impact is Israeli strikes
Fiat solves – the plan just IS, and Congress like it; the Disad is a "would" question
Israeli strike triggers global nuclear war
Morning Star 6 ~Jan 13, Lexis~ Peace campaigners warned yesterday that the world faces a renewed threat of "all- AND third world war - and even, possibly, all-out nuclear war
Cordseman 13 – Anthony, Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) in Washington, D.C. ~9/1, "President Obama and Syria: The ’Waiting for Godot’ Strategy," http://csis.org/publication/president-obama-and-syria-waiting-godot-strategy~~cs Instead, the Administration first rushed into the kind of rhetoric you only use if AND to return for its holiday. The message to the world is obvious.
Link is about drone courts – lol
Oversight doesn’t determine flexibility—-tech, elusive enemies and personnel outweigh
Holmes 9 – Stephen, Walter E. Meyer Professor of Law, New York University School of Law ~"The Brennan Center Jorde Symposium on Constitutional Law: In Case of Emergency: Misunderstanding Tradeoffs in the War on Terror", April, California Law Review, 97 Calif. L. Rev. 301, Lexis~cs Even if the promoters of unfettered executive power were justified in associating legal rules with AND is the fruit of wishful thinking is the least that might be said.
No link – NSC preserves enough executive flexibility
McCarthy and Velshi 9 – Andrew, Director of the Center for Law 26 Counterterrorism at the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies and Alykhan, attorney at the Center for Law 26 Counterterrorism ~Aug. 20, "Outsourcing American Law," AEI Working Paper, http://www.aei.org/files/2009/08/20/20090820-Chapter6.pdf~~cs What is an asset in the criminal justice system, however, would be a AND be at liberty to create new entitlements by analogizing to ordinary criminal proceedings.
Focus on credibility causes terrible policy—-the aff’s a better approach
Jonathan Mercer 8/28, 2013, associate professor of political science at the University of Washington in Seattle and a Fellow at the Center for International Studies at the London School of Economics. Bad Reputation, 28 August 2013, www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/139376/jonathan-mercer/bad-reputation Even if Assad were so simpleminded, the administration’s critics are wrong to suggest that AND suicide out of fear that others might later wrongly think one is dead. It is also possible that the United States did not factor into Assad’s calculations. AND , if overthrowing Assad were easy, it would already have been done. Instead of worrying about U.S. credibility or the president’s reputation, the administration should focus on what can be done to reinforce the longstanding norm against the use of weapons of mass destruction.
Their impact evidence is describing the SQ
Joffe 13 – Josef, WSJ ~Exploiting Obama’s Foreign Policy Retreat~cs "We are extremely disappointed," the White House press secretary said after Moscow granted AND in the Middle East has been a top American priority since the 1970s. and Imperial Japan. In our time, it is second-rate powers like Russia and Iran, and non-nations like Hezbollah, that are taking on the United States, and they do so because they can.
11/29/13
2ac Deterrence DA NDT Rnd 1
Tournament: NDT | Round: 1 | Opponent: Missouri State BR | Judge: Decker, Struth, Watson A2: Deterrence DA – 2AC counterforce will fail now – we don’t have enough weapons Spring 13 (Baker Spring, M. Kirby Research Fellow in National Security Policy in the Douglas and Sarah Allison Center for Foreign Policy Studies, “Disarm Now, Ask Questions Later: Obama’s Nuclear Weapons Policy,” July 2013) http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2013/07/disarm-now-ask-questions-later-obamas-nuclear-weapons-policy The evidence in the NPRIS fact sheet supporting the argument that the numbers were chosen AND deterrent, drive a review of the U.S. nuclear force. The most significant flaws are: Flaw #1: An obscure targeting policy. The NPRIS states that U. AND principle of liberty, it values the security and prosperity of its people. Thus, the most effective nuclear deterrent for the U.S. against a AND from the White House requiring that the DOD to pursue it.10 Accordingly, the problem with the NPRIS is that a counterforce employment and targeting policy AND .S. faces a coalition of strategic enemies made possible by proliferation. We control uq – 1AC Evans Link in 1NC was NFU… RLOAD allows retaliation – their links aren’t specific enough Phillips and Star 4 – Alan, M.D., Cambridge physicist, radar researcher during WW2 , and Steven, nuclear engineer, medical technologist http://www.wagingpeace.org/articles/2004/09/00_phillips_eliminate-launch-warning.htmcs No-LoW is compatible with deterrence The purpose of deterrence is to prevent either AND - an accidental war due to a false warning - will be eliminated. Miscalc makes deterrence collapse more likely Avery 14 – John, B.Sc. in theoretical physics from MIT and AND 1988- 1997). Chairman of the Danish Peace Academy, April 2004. Feb 2, An Accident Waiting To Happen, CounterCurrentscs An accident waiting to happen. The probability of a catastrophic nuclear war occurring by AND , through technical accident or human failure, mutual deterrence might thus collapse." Deterrence collapses immediately – LOW is irrelevant if the attack is real but RLOAD does not hurt retaliation cred Phillips and Starr 7 – Alan, M.D., Cambridge physicist, radar researcher during WW2 , and Steven, nuclear engineer, medical technologist Jan 8, http://www.worldfederalistscanada.org/rload/Replace_LoW_Policy_8Jan.pdfcn RLOAD is compatible with deterrence The purpose of deterrence is to prevent either side from AND first strike" will be successful, as the following discussion will show.
3/28/14
2ac ICJ CP NDT Rnd 1
Tournament: NDT | Round: 1 | Opponent: Missouri State BR | Judge: Decker, Struth, Watson A2: ICJ CP – 2AC Frontlines No solve warming advantage Offshore balancing and nukes deter war Adams 11 – Professor U.S. Foreign Policy Program – American University, Distinguished Fellow – Stimson Center Gordon, “A Leaner and Meaner Defense,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 90 Iss. 1, January/Februarygw Some people point to China as a successor to the Soviet Union and cite it AND when they involve a stabilization mission, governance reform, and economic development. The counterplan’s appeal to a specific institution over a narrow policy results in fragmentation that turns the net benefit Downs 7 – George, Stanford Law Review Nov, “EMPIRE'S NEW CLOTHES: POLITICAL ECONOMY AND THE FRAGMENTATION OF INTERNATIONAL LAW The decades following the end of the Cold War have witnessed the growing proliferation of AND one becomes too responsive to the interests of weaker states and their agents. Perm: Have the ICJ rule and implement the plan as the result. Not severance – whole plan is done. Permutation just specifies implementation mechanism. Not intrinsic – includes only the plan and c-plan. It’s justified because the c-plan includes the whole aff and doesn’t have a solvency advocate for ICJ ruling on the plan. U.S. won’t go along with ICJ restrictions on the use of nukes, or the CP gets rolled back Hirsch 6 – Jorge, Professor of physics. University of California Mar 10, http://www.antiwar.com/hirsch/?articleid=8678cn Addressing the legal status of the threat and use of nuclear weapons, the International AND as a member state of the United Nations recognizes its jurisdiction and judgments.
Perm: The USFG should abide by the authority of the ICJ by adopting a policy of RLOAD. Precedent already exists Granoff 9 – Jonathan, president of the Global Security Institute “The Process of Zero,” http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/wopj.2010.26.4.85cn If we conclude that nuclear weapons are more of a hazard than any problem they AND the goals of the NPT, in a way that promotes international stability.” Cosmopolitanism is already occurring, specifically in terms of nukes Sato 9 – Yoshiaki, international lawyer TOWARDS THE INSTITUTIONALIZATION OF COSMOPOLITAN LAW-MAKING, Alberta Law Review, LN The emergence of de facto cosmopolitan law-making activities, as well as the AND better framework to serve the citizens of the world in this age of globalization The CP has the U.S. follow the ICJ’s decision, that’s a voting issue: 1) It fiats a mindset shift in the relevant USFG actors – arguing the ruling wouldn’t be implemented is crucial aff offense 2) Counter-interpretation: the neg only gets to fiat the U.S. recommends the plan, not that they follow it – otherwise, the CP is just the plan with a specified implementation mechanism
3/28/14
2ac Politics NDT Rnd 1
Tournament: NDT | Round: 1 | Opponent: Missouri State BR | Judge: Decker, Struth, Watson A2: Politics Generic 2AC Obama will have no PC the rest of his presidency – he’ll resort to XO Cook 14 – Charlie, National Journal Mar 17, Political Déjà Vu, National Journal. Lexiscs President Obama's job-approval ratings are very likely to remain pretty much where they AND have to suck it up; it isn't likely to change anytime soon. Online Gambling Bill thumps the DA Demirjian 3/26 Karoun Demirjian, No poker exception in new legislation in Congress to ban online gaming, March 26, 2014, http://lasvegassun.com/news/2014/mar/26/no-poker-exception-new-legislation-congress-ban-on//joe) Authors of the new online gaming bill in Congress have issued a challenge to Nevada AND page piece of legislation is going to inspire some pretty heavy political conflict. No impact to economic decline – Newest Data Drezner 14 – Daniel, Professor of International Relations at Tufts Jan, The System Worked: Global Economic Governance during the Great Recession, World Politics, Volume 66. Number 1, January 2014, pp. 123-164cs The final significant outcome addresses a dog that hasn't barked: the effect of the AND surge in protectionist nationalism or ethnic exclusion that might have been expected."43 Signals indicate resilient economy Mantell 2/20 – Ruth, Journalist for MarketWatch and WSJ. 2/20/14, MarketWatch, “Leading data signal ‘resilient’ economy in 2014.’ http://www.marketwatch.com/story/leading-data-signal-resilient-economy-in-2014-2014-02-20cc The economy will likely “remain resilient” in the first half of 2014, AND .2 for the six-month period that ended in December. Unemployment insurance thumps – it’s top of the agenda O’Keefe 3/27 – Ed, Washington Post 2014, http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2014/03/27/senate-launches-debate-on-extending-unemployment-insurance/cs But its outcome in the House remains uncertain, as Speaker John A. Boehner AND a proposal to raise the federal minimum wage to $10.10. Loser’s lose is false Beutler 13 – Brian, Salon staff writer 9/9, GOP’s massive new lie: The truth about Obama’s second term, www.salon.com/2013/09/09/syria_wont_derail_obamas_second_term_house_republicans_will/cs When President Obama decided to seek authorization to bomb Syria, he didn’t just throw AND or a farm bill, or a budget deal, or anything else. Logical policymaker could do the plan and not backlash against the agenda Court action dodges the link Rosenberg 91 – Gerald, professor of political science at University of Chicago The Holl
3/28/14
2ac T-Troops NDT Rnd 1
Tournament: NDT | Round: 1 | Opponent: Missouri State BR | Judge: Decker, Struth, Watson A2: T – Troops – 2AC We Meet – troops launch the missiles and are threatened by strikes – makes US a zone of hostilities – and, we would follow a nuclear strike with ground troops immediately C/I – Armed Forces means troops and non-civilian weapons Manuel 12 – Victor, J.D. from University of California at San Diego http://www.victortorreslaw.com/blog/is-the-second-amendment-outdated.htmlcs Times have changed. Today, no one questions the need for the government to AND . Fighting in the streets, mass civilian slaughters and untold human suffering. C/I– Armed force aren’t just troops and hostilities are violent actions directed toward an enemy Healey 12 – Jason Healey, director of the Cyber Statecraft Initiative at the Atlantic Council, and A.J. Wilson, visiting fellow at the Atlantic Council, edited version of a paper which first appeared a special edition of the Georgetown Journal of International Affairs “Cyber Conflict and the War Powers Resolution: Congressional Oversight of Hostilities in the Fifth Domain,” 2012) http://www.acus.org/files/publication_pdfs/403/bsc130221cyberwprpub.pdfgw Arguing the point, an administration lawyer might ask, rhetorically, what exactly do AND , the DoD recognizes they would be engaged in hostile acts in cyberspace. Prefer Our Interpretation:
We control uniqueness – no-one is running hostilities affs– their interpretation locks the aff into stale mechanisms that prevent innovation 2. Our definition is most predictable and key to real world education Fisher 11 – Louis Fisher, Scholar in Residence, The Constitution Project, testimony to the Committee on Senate Foreign Relations “LIBYA AND WAR POWERS,” 6/28/11gw The Obama administration has been preoccupied with efforts to interpret words beyond their ordinary and AND of peace to a state or war without seeking and obtaining congressional authority. 3. They limit out future conflicts Takeyh 12 – Nikolas K. Gvosdev a professor of national security studies at the U.S. Naval War College, Ray Takeyh is a senior fellow for Middle Eastern studies at the Council on Foreign Relations Jan/Feb 2012 “Decline of Western Realism,” The National Interest, Proquestgw Finally, there is the ongoing revolution in military affairs - particularly the emergence of AND , the Obama team may be prepared to start implementing this new approach. 4. War powers debates are meaningless without nukes Wills 10 5. No limits explosion –Agent CPs solve any aff that doesn’t talk about authority and we link worse to hostilities DAs 6. It’s predictable – it’s defended in the literature, and teams have been reading nuclear affs all year 7. Good is good enough
Evans 10 – Gareth, President and Chief Executive of the Brussels-based International Crisis Group, Report of the International Commission on Nuclear Non-proliferation and Disarmament ~"ELIMINATING NUCLEAR THREATS," ICNND, Online~cn Maintaining thousands of nuclear warheads on dangerously high launch on warning alert is the ultimate AND maker miscalculation should to an important degree be attributed to sheer luck.’
And it’s inevitable:
First, early warning glitches and human error
Phillips 26 Starr 4 – Alan, M.D., Cambridge physicist, radar researcher during WW2 , and Steven, nuclear engineer, medical technologist ~May/Jun, "Let’s go No-LOW," Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Vol 60: No 3~cn As long as the United States and Russia retain their arsenals of nuclear-armed AND systems may not only cease to provide redundancy—it may amplify mistakes.
Second, overlapping false alarms
Sennott 1 – Linn, Ph.D., Professor of Mathematics, Illinois State University ~http://www-ee.stanford.edu/~~hellman/Breakthrough/book/chapters/sennott.html~~cn Data made available by the American government under its Freedom of Information Act show that AND false alarm rates are one hundred per year for both satellites and radars.
Third, short decision-making times
Barrett 13 – Anthony, PhD in Engineering and Public Policy from Carnegie Mellon University AND BS in Political Science from Columbia and Research Assistant at Global Catastrophic Risk Institute ~June 28, Analyzing and Reducing the Risks of Inadvertent Nuclear War Between the United States and Russia~cs Attack indicators may or may not be resolved (identified as a false alarm) AND error-prone LOW posture during periods of high tensions or crisis.34
And fourth, deliberate cyber-attacks on early warning systems
Fritz 9 – Jason, radar signaling specialist, International Commission on Nuclear Nonproliferation and Disarmament ~Jul 30, http://www.ifap.ru/pr/2009/n090730a.pdf~~cn The US nuclear arsenal remains designed for the Cold War. This means its paramount AND in order to issue false voice commands (Andersen 2001, Chapter 16).
Miscalc sparks US-Russia war and causes extinction
——Weather, computer chips, wild animals, training tapes, intentional manipulation Barrett 13 – Anthony, PhD in Engineering and Public Policy from Carnegie Mellon University AND BS in Political Science from Columbia and Research Assistant at Global Catastrophic Risk Institute ~June 28, Analyzing and Reducing the Risks of Inadvertent Nuclear War Between the United States and Russia~cs War involving significant fractions of the U.S. and Russian nuclear arsenals, AND making one or both nations more likely to misinterpret events as attacks. 16
Russia’s war plans ensures they’ll retaliate
Thompson 9 – Nicholas, senior editor of Wired ~Sept 21, "Inside the Apocalyptic Soviet Doomsday Machine," Wired~cn "The Perimeter system is very, very nice," he says. "We AND . After all, he says, Dead Hand is continuously being upgraded.
The past is not predictive – close calls prove the risk of accidental war is high
Sagan 93 – Scott, professor of political science and co-director of the Center for International Security and Cooperation ~"The limits of safety: Organizations, accidents, and nuclear weapons" pp. 11-12~cn One possibility is to assume that this central fact proves that the danger of nuclear AND —even an apparently perfect final safety record may not inspire extreme confidence.
India and Pakistan model the U.S.
Mian 2 – Zia, Physicist at Princeton and Frank Hippel, Professor of Public and International Affairs at Princeton ~"U.S.-Russian Lessons for South Asia". August 2, 2002. Foreign Policy in Focus. http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/437~~cs The current South Asian crisis seems to have ebbed, but the underlying dynamic remains AND Russia instead of sending them forward in a threatening manner—as it does
That risks nuclear conflict
Beres 98 – Louis Rene, PhD Princeton ~American University International Law Review. "In a Dark Time: The Expected Consequences of an India-Pakistan Nuclear Exchange" 1998. Lexis.~cs Indian and Pakistani inclinations to launch preemptive strikes may also be affected by the other’s AND of accidental or unauthorized attacks against each state’s own armaments and population centers.
Retaliatory Launch Only After Detonation, or RLOAD, solves nuclear miscalc
Phillips 26 Starr 7 – Alan, M.D., Cambridge physicist, radar researcher during WW2 , and Steven, nuclear engineer, medical technologist ~Jan 8, http://www.worldfederalistscanada.org/rload/Replace_LoW_Policy_8Jan.pdf~~cn Replacing LoW with RLOAD would require, in the American system, feeding any positive AND the predicted time of arrival, the crews would revert to peacetime readiness.
RLOAD bans launches based on false alarm – first strikes don’t take out our solvency
Starr 9 – Steven, senior scientist with Physicians for Social Responsibility; Director of Clinical Laboratory Science Program, University of Missouri-Columbia; Areas of Expertise: Taking nuclear weapons off high-alert status ~"New Terms for a Common Understanding of De-Alerting," http://www.nucleardarkness.org/highalert/~~23_ftn8~~cn Preemptive Launch is the unambiguous AND to an incoming strike of conventional warheads.14
Warming – 1AC
Advantage 2 is Warming
Warming is anthropogenic – this is the culmination of almost a 12,000 studies
Cook 13 – John, Global Change Institute, University of Queensland, Australia ~15 May, Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scienti?c literature. Environ. Res. Lett. 8 (2013) 024024 (7pp)~cs We analyze the evolution of the scienti?c consensus on anthropogenic global warming (AGW) AND the consensus on AGW is a vanishingly small proportion of the published research.
And, warming is speeding up – negative feedbacks and CO2 good arguments have been disproven
Artic Permafrost, Less land-based absorption of CO2, winds expose deep water layers, vegetation, wildfires Lyderson 9 – Kari, Washington Post ~Feb 15, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/14/AR2009021401757.html~~cn The pace of global warming is likely to be much faster than recent predictions, AND past are likely to become drier as temperatures rise, growing more vulnerable.
But, it’s not irreversible yet – there is no leg between cuts and response
Desjardins 13 – Clea, member of Concordia university Media Relations Department, academic writer, citing Damon Matthews; associate professor of the Department of Geography, Planning and Environment at Concordia University, PhD, Member of the Global Environmental and Climate Change Center ~"Global Warming: Irreversible but Not Inevitable,"~cs There is a persistent misconception among both scientists and the public that there is a AND mitigation challenge, clarifying these points of hope is critical to motivate change."-http://www.concordia.ca/now/what-we-do/research/20130402/global-warming-irreversible-but-not-inevitable.php)
Warming makes oceans acidic – the impact is extinction
Kristof 6 – Nicholas, New York Times, American journalist, author, op-ed columnist, and a winner of two Pulitzer Prizes ~Jul, "Scandal Below the Surface," Online~cn If you think of the earth’s surface as a great beaker, then it’s filled AND . We stand, so to speak, on the shoulders of plankton.
Status quo Supreme Court precedent does not grant standing to those wishing to file suits based on potential harms to future generations
Mank 9 – Bradford, Professor of Law, University of Cincinnati College of Law ~34 Colum. J. Envtl. L. 1, LEXIS~cn Many issues, especially potential environmental catastrophes caused by climate change, affect not just AND plaintiff who seeks only to protect the rights or interests of future generations.
Ruling on launch on warning gives the Court a solid case to establish a precedent in favor of intergenerational justice
Johnson 87 – Clifford, professor in Physics and Astronomy at the University of Southern California ~Spring, http://cpsr.org/prevsite/publications/newsletters/old/1980s/Spring1987.txt/~~cn The Nunn-Warner group’s work in some areas, notably including test ban proposals AND as Justice Goldberg observed: "The Constitution is not a suicide pact."
Posterity Clause ruling on the plan establishes intergenerational standing that solves warming
Davidson 3 – John Edward, J.D., Professor of Constitutional Law, Pioneer Pacific College; Senior Research Fellow, Constitutional Law Foundation ~"Tomorrow’s Standing Today: How the Equitable Jurisdiction Clause of Article III, Section 2 Confers Standing Upon Future Generations," 28 Colum. J. Envtl. L. 185, LEXIS~cn We deplete freshwater aquifers many times faster than nature can replenish them. 4 We AND rights in the absence of any more specific congressional authorization than 1331. 26
Plan
Plan: United States federal judiciary should substantially increase judicial restrictions on the President’s authority to introduce armed forces into hostilities by holding that policies that allow the United States to launch a retaliatory nuclear attack before a nuclear detonation in the United States are unconstitutional under the Posterity Clause because these policies represent an unacceptable risk of irreversible damage to the rights of future generations.
Solvency
Launch On Warning is still in place
Gronlund 14 – Lisbeth, Co-director of Global Security at Union of Concerned Scientists, Physicist, expert on technical issues related to U.S. nuclear weapons policy, and new nuclear weapons, space weapons, and ballistic missile defenses ~Jan 17, http://blog.ucsusa.org/drugs-lies-cheating-nuclear-missiles-378~~cs-http://blog.ucsusa.org/drugs-lies-cheating-nuclear-missiles-3785dcs These misadventures demonstrate that this system—like all systems—is fallible. But AND the policy remains unchanged. President Obama, what are you waiting for?
Self-interest and normative pressure means the executive will comply with Court decisions
Pildes 12 – Richard, Sulder Family Professor of Constitutional Law at the NYU School of Law and the Co-Director of the NYU Center on Law and Security ~"Book Review: Law and the President", Harvard Law Review, April, 125 Harv. L. Rev. 1381, Lexis~cs The Incomplete Consequentialist Theory for the Role of Law For these reasons, I want AND distinction that seems of limited pragmatic significance, as the next Part shows.
Multiple past de-alerting measures disprove their links
Armed force include weapons, and hostilities are violent actions directed toward an enemy
Healey 12 – Jason Healey, director of the Cyber Statecraft Initiative at the Atlantic Council, and A.J. Wilson, visiting fellow at the Atlantic Council, edited version of a paper which first appeared a special edition of the Georgetown Journal of International Affairs ~"Cyber Conflict and the War Powers Resolution: Congressional Oversight of Hostilities in the Fifth Domain," 2012) http://www.acus.org/files/publication_pdfs/403/bsc130221cyberwprpub.pdf~~gw Arguing the point, an administration lawyer might ask, rhetorically, what exactly do AND no doubt, the DoD recognizes they would be engaged in hostile acts in
The United States Congress should establish an Article III National Security Court with exclusive jurisdiction over the United States’ indefinite detention policy, specifically individuals detained pursuant to P.L. 107-40. Congress should mandate that all such individuals be expediently tried or released.
Advantage 1
Advantage 1 is Legitimacy
US credibility is collapsing due to detention policy
Welsh 11 – David, J.D. from University of Utah ~"Procedural Justice Post-9/11: The Effects of Procedurally Unfair Treatment of Detainees on Perceptions of Global Legitimacy", http://law.unh.edu/assets/images/uploads/publications/unh-law-review-vol-09-no2-welsh.pdf~~cs The Global War on Terror 1 has been ideologically framed as a struggle between the AND this article offers a psychological perspective of legitimacy in the context of detention.
That credibility is key to mobilize cooperation on global issues like warming and disease
Ikenberry 11 – John. G., Albert G. Milbank Professor of Politics and International Affairs at Princeton ~Spring, http://www.democracyjournal.org/20/a-world-of-our-making.php?page=all~~cs Grand Strategy as Liberal Order Building American dominance of the global system will eventually yield AND liberal order building, it can begin the process of gaining it back.
US leadership is key to bringing countries on board for international climate policy
Warming makes oceans acidic – the impact is extinction
Kristof 6 – Nicholas, New York Times, American journalist, author, op-ed columnist, and a winner of two Pulitzer Prizes ~Jul, "Scandal Below the Surface," Online~cn If you think of the earth’s surface as a great beaker, then it’s filled AND . We stand, so to speak, on the shoulders of plankton.
Globalization means unchecked disease spread causes extinction
Detention erodes the institutional credibility that supports US hegemony
Knowles 9 – Robert, NYU Law School ~Spring, "Article: American Hegemony and the Foreign Affairs Constitution", 41 Ariz. St. L.J. 87, Lexis~cs The hegemonic model also reduces the need for executive branch flexibility, and the institutional AND courts to reduce the "deference gap" between foreign and domestic cases.
Material power’s irrelevant – lack of legitimacy makes heg ineffective
Mendelsohn 10 – Barak, assistant professor of political science at Haverford College and fellow at June, "The Question of International Cooperation in the War on Terrorism", http://www.fpri.org/enotes/201006.mendelsohn.cooperationwarterror.html~~cs Going against common conceptions, I argue that the United States sought to advance more AND This process constrains the hegemon’s actions and prevents the uninhibited exercise of power.
Hegemony is key to prevent global security competitions – key to solve nuclear great power wars
Brooks, Ikenberry, and Wohlforth 13 – Stephen G. Brooks is Associate Professor of Government at Dartmouth, G. John Ikenberry is the Albert G. Milbank Professor of Politics and International Affairs at Princeton University in the Department of Politics and the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Global Eminence Scholar at Kyung Hee University, and William C. Wohlforth, Daniel Webster Professor in the Department of Government at Dartmouth ~"Don’t Come Home, America: The Case Against Retrenchment, International Security, Vol. 37, No. 3 (Winter 2012/13), pp. 7–51, http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/files/IS3703_Brooks20Wohlforth20Ikenberry.pdf~~gw A core premise of deep engagement is that it prevents the emergence of a far AND Moreover, switching between offshore and onshore balancing could well be dif ficult. Advantage 2
Advantage 2 is Modeling
US detention policies are modelled globally—Specifically, Malaysia uses Guantanamo to justify detention abuses
It’s reverse causal—hypocrisy on Guantanamo prevents US influence in Malaysia
Mariner 8—Joanne, director of Hunter College’s Human Rights Program. Before joining Hunter in 2011, she worked at Human Rights Watch, most recently as the director of the organization’s Terrorism and Counterterrorism Program. Before joining Human Rights Watch, Mariner served as a law clerk to Judge Stephen Reinhardt of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. She graduated summa cum laude from Barnard College and received a JD from Yale Law School. ~4/24, http://www.counterpunch.org/2008/04/24/u-s-hypocrisy-and-the-malaysian-guant-aacute-namo/~~ab-http://www.counterpunch.org/2008/04/24/u-s-hypocrisy-and-the-malaysian-guant-aacute-namo/5dab U.S. Hypocrisy and the Malaysian Guantánamo¶ by JOANNE MARINER¶ " AND ISA. Hopefully, in both countries, fairer options will soon emerge.
Current Malaysian detention policy destroys Malay rule of law and risks political instability
ALRC 3—Asian Legal Resource Centre ~http://www.alrc.net/doc/mainfile.php/59written_item11f/187~~ab Political detention under Malaysia’s Internal Security Act¶ 1. In its written statement on AND Hishamuddin Rais; and, Free Anwar Campaign director Raja Petra Raja Kamaruddin.
Continued US violations of detention norms justify a world paradigm shift
Chaffee 9 – David, JD. Advocacy Counsel at Human Rights First ~42 Case W. Res. J. Int’l L. 187, "Dismantling Guantanamo: Facing the Challenges of Continued Detention and Repatriation: The Cost Of Indefinitely Kicking The Can: Why Continued "Prolonged" Detention Is No Solution To Guantanamo"~cs The most oft cited reasons by current and former government officials for closing Guantanamo is AND U.S. diplomatic power and ability to champion human rights abroad.
Malaysian is the economic backbone of ASEAN—key to resolving SCS conflict
Rajaratnam 92—Sinnathamby, former Foreign Minister of Singapore ~9/1, http://www.asean.org/news/item/asean-the-way-ahead-by-s-rajaratnam~~ab Should regionalism collapse, then ASEAN too will go the way of earlier regional attempts AND , would be the last war ~hu~mankind will ever fight.
Malaysia is the linchpin of the Arc of Instability—key to Southeast Asian stability
Ding 13—Gang, People’s Daily ~5/8, http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/780236.shtml~~23.Uk1LRiQZ8eM~~ab Malaysia has a population of 29 million, 55 percent of which are Malaysian Muslims AND , and pushing forward manageable reforms at a time of greater political awareness.
Regional security concerns initiate China-funded Burmese prolif—triggers Southeast Asian arms race and US draw-in—risks first strike and escalation
Selth 7—Andrew, Research Fellow at the Griffith Asia Institute, He has been studying international security issues and Asian affairs for 35 years, as a diplomat, strategic intelligence analyst and academic. He has published five books and more than 70 peer-reviewed monographs and articles, most of them about Burma and related subjects. His latest major work was Burma’s Armed Forces: Power without Glory ~http://www.griffith.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0015/18240/regional-outlook-volume-12.pdf~~ab In international affairs, however, the perception often becomes the reality. Countries make AND by the SPDC to acquire strategic weapon systems could have the opposite effect.¶
Multiple flashpoints prove Asian miscalc goes global
Landay 2k – National Security Expert at Knight Ridder ~3/10/’2K, Jonathan, Knight Ridder, lexis~gw Few if any experts think China and Taiwan, North Korea and South Korea, AND Asia that totaled 24600 billion last year, according to the Commerce Department Solvency
An Article III National Security Court restores our global image
Sulmasy 9 – Glenn, Associate Professor of Law at the US Coast Guard Academy and National ~April 13, "THE NEED FOR A NATIONAL SECURITY COURT SYSTEM"~cs THE WAY FORWARD¶ The President, Secretary Gates and Secretary Rice have all declared AND dedicated to the administration of justice and to upholding the rule of law.
NSC can’t and won’t be circumvented
Lunday 8 – Kevin E., Captain and judge advocate in the U.S. Coast Guard, with Harvey Rishikof, professor of law and former chair of the Department of National Security Strategy, National War College ~Fall, "Due Process Is a Strategic Choice: Legitimacy and the Establishment of an Article III National Security Court," 39 Cal. W. Int’l L.J. 87~cs The primary triggering mechanism for establishing NSC jurisdiction would fall within the discretion and control AND , it would be permitted to sua sponte transfer the case to NSC jurisdiction
Lunday 8 – Kevin E., Captain and judge advocate in the U.S. Coast Guard, with Harvey Rishikof, professor of law and former chair of the Department of National Security Strategy, National War College ~Fall, "Due Process Is a Strategic Choice: Legitimacy and the Establishment of an Article III National Security Court," 39 Cal. W. Int’l L.J. 87~cs These proposals deserve careful scrutiny by the public, and particularly by the U. AND National Security Court, and addressing the most prominent criticisms of the concept.
Institutional legitimacy creates reservoirs of support that strengthen the rule of law
Welsh 11 – David, J.D. from University of Utah ~"Procedural Justice Post-9/11: The Effects of Procedurally Unfair Treatment of Detainees on Perceptions of Global Legitimacy", http://law.unh.edu/assets/images/uploads/publications/unh-law-review-vol-09-no2-welsh.pdf~~cs In the context of the War on Terror, legitimacy is the critical missing element AND with the unique procedural issues created by a growing number of suspected terrorists.
Just released detainees from Gitmo – DAs are n/u
Rosenberg 1/2 ~Carol Rosenberg - The Miami Herald/McClatchy-Tribune, Guantanamo releases picked up as 2013 drew to a close, Corpus Christi Caller-Times, Janaury 2, 2014joe) In rapid succession, the U.S. in December sent Guantanamo prisoners home AND -by-case basis, fashioning specific solutions for each individual captive.
Multiple past de-alerting measures disprove their links
Blair 8 – Dr. Bruce, President of the World Security Institute http://www.peaceactionme.org/taking-nuclear-forces-day-day-alert De-alerting U.S. nuclear forces has occurred before. AND by comparable steps in Russia at the direction of President Mikhail Gorbachev.
Gronlund 14 – Lisbeth, Co-director of Global Security at Union of Concerned Scientists, Physicist, expert on technical issues related to U.S. nuclear weapons policy, and new nuclear weapons, space weapons, and ballistic missile defenses ~Jan 17, http://blog.ucsusa.org/drugs-lies-cheating-nuclear-missiles-378~~cs-http://blog.ucsusa.org/drugs-lies-cheating-nuclear-missiles-3785dcs These misadventures demonstrate that this system—like all systems—is fallible. But AND the policy remains unchanged. President Obama, what are you waiting for?
Miscalc – 1AC
Advantage 2 is Miscalculation:
Miscalc is the only scenario for nuclear war
Evans 10 – Gareth, President and Chief Executive of the Brussels-based International Crisis Group, Report of the International Commission on Nuclear Non-proliferation and Disarmament ~"ELIMINATING NUCLEAR THREATS," ICNND, Online~cn Maintaining thousands of nuclear warheads on dangerously high launch on warning alert is the ultimate AND maker miscalculation should to an important degree be attributed to sheer luck.’
And it’s inevitable:
First, early warning glitches and human error
Phillips 26 Starr 4 – Alan, M.D., Cambridge physicist, radar researcher during WW2 , and Steven, nuclear engineer, medical technologist ~May/Jun, "Let’s go No-LOW," Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Vol 60: No 3~cn As long as the United States and Russia retain their arsenals of nuclear-armed AND systems may not only cease to provide redundancy—it may amplify mistakes.
Second, overlapping false alarms
Sennott 1 – Linn, Ph.D., Professor of Mathematics, Illinois State University ~http://www-ee.stanford.edu/~~hellman/Breakthrough/book/chapters/sennott.html~~cn Data made available by the American government under its Freedom of Information Act show that AND false alarm rates are one hundred per year for both satellites and radars.
Third, short decision-making times
Barrett 13 – Anthony, PhD in Engineering and Public Policy from Carnegie Mellon University AND BS in Political Science from Columbia and Research Assistant at Global Catastrophic Risk Institute ~June 28, Analyzing and Reducing the Risks of Inadvertent Nuclear War Between the United States and Russia~cs Attack indicators may or may not be resolved (identified as a false alarm) AND error-prone LOW posture during periods of high tensions or crisis.34
And fourth, deliberate cyber-attacks on early warning systems
Fritz 9 – Jason, radar signaling specialist, International Commission on Nuclear Nonproliferation and Disarmament ~Jul 30, http://www.ifap.ru/pr/2009/n090730a.pdf~~cn The US nuclear arsenal remains designed for the Cold War. This means its paramount AND in order to issue false voice commands (Andersen 2001, Chapter 16).
Miscalc sparks US-Russia war and causes extinction
——Weather, computer chips, wild animals, training tapes, intentional manipulation Barrett 13 – Anthony, PhD in Engineering and Public Policy from Carnegie Mellon University AND BS in Political Science from Columbia and Research Assistant at Global Catastrophic Risk Institute ~June 28, Analyzing and Reducing the Risks of Inadvertent Nuclear War Between the United States and Russia~cs War involving significant fractions of the U.S. and Russian nuclear arsenals, AND making one or both nations more likely to misinterpret events as attacks. 16
Russia’s war plans ensures they’ll retaliate
Thompson 9 – Nicholas, senior editor of Wired ~Sept 21, "Inside the Apocalyptic Soviet Doomsday Machine," Wired~cn "The Perimeter system is very, very nice," he says. "We AND . After all, he says, Dead Hand is continuously being upgraded.
The past is not predictive – close calls prove the risk of accidental war is high
Sagan 93 – Scott, professor of political science and co-director of the Center for International Security and Cooperation ~"The limits of safety: Organizations, accidents, and nuclear weapons" pp. 11-12~cn One possibility is to assume that this central fact proves that the danger of nuclear AND —even an apparently perfect final safety record may not inspire extreme confidence.
India and Pakistan model the U.S.
Mian 2 – Zia, Physicist at Princeton and Frank Hippel, Professor of Public and International Affairs at Princeton ~"U.S.-Russian Lessons for South Asia". August 2, 2002. Foreign Policy in Focus. http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/437~~cs The current South Asian crisis seems to have ebbed, but the underlying dynamic remains AND Russia instead of sending them forward in a threatening manner—as it does
That risks nuclear conflict
Beres 98 – Louis Rene, PhD Princeton ~American University International Law Review. "In a Dark Time: The Expected Consequences of an India-Pakistan Nuclear Exchange" 1998. Lexis.~cs Indian and Pakistani inclinations to launch preemptive strikes may also be affected by the other’s AND of accidental or unauthorized attacks against each state’s own armaments and population centers.
Retaliatory Launch Only After Detonation, or RLOAD, solves nuclear miscalc
Phillips 26 Starr 7 – Alan, M.D., Cambridge physicist, radar researcher during WW2 , and Steven, nuclear engineer, medical technologist ~Jan 8, http://www.worldfederalistscanada.org/rload/Replace_LoW_Policy_8Jan.pdf~~cn Replacing LoW with RLOAD would require, in the American system, feeding any positive AND the predicted time of arrival, the crews would revert to peacetime readiness.
RLOAD bans launches based on false alarm – first strikes don’t take out our solvency
Starr 9 – Steven, senior scientist with Physicians for Social Responsibility; Director of Clinical Laboratory Science Program, University of Missouri-Columbia; Areas of Expertise: Taking nuclear weapons off high-alert status ~"New Terms for a Common Understanding of De-Alerting," http://www.nucleardarkness.org/highalert/~~23_ftn8~~cn Preemptive Launch is the unambiguous First Use AND prevent the launch of nuclear weapons in reaction to an incoming strike of conventional warheads.14
Warming – 1AC
Advantage 1 is Warming
Warming is anthropogenic – this is the culmination of almost a 12,000 studies
Cook 13 – John, Global Change Institute, University of Queensland, Australia ~15 May, Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scienti?c literature. Environ. Res. Lett. 8 (2013) 024024 (7pp)~cs We analyze the evolution of the scienti?c consensus on anthropogenic global warming (AGW) AND the consensus on AGW is a vanishingly small proportion of the published research.
And, warming is speeding up – negative feedbacks and CO2 good arguments have been disproven
Artic Permafrost, Less land-based absorption of CO2, winds expose deep water layers, vegetation, wildfires Lyderson 9 – Kari, Washington Post ~Feb 15, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/14/AR2009021401757.html~~cn The pace of global warming is likely to be much faster than recent predictions, AND past are likely to become drier as temperatures rise, growing more vulnerable.
But, it’s not irreversible yet – there is no leg between cuts and response
Desjardins 13 – Clea, member of Concordia university Media Relations Department, academic writer, citing Damon Matthews; associate professor of the Department of Geography, Planning and Environment at Concordia University, PhD, Member of the Global Environmental and Climate Change Center ~"Global Warming: Irreversible but Not Inevitable,"~cs There is a persistent misconception among both scientists and the public that there is a AND mitigation challenge, clarifying these points of hope is critical to motivate change."-http://www.concordia.ca/now/what-we-do/research/20130402/global-warming-irreversible-but-not-inevitable.php)
Warming makes oceans acidic – the impact is extinction
Kristof 6 – Nicholas, New York Times, American journalist, author, op-ed columnist, and a winner of two Pulitzer Prizes ~Jul, "Scandal Below the Surface," Online~cn If you think of the earth’s surface as a great beaker, then it’s filled AND . We stand, so to speak, on the shoulders of plankton.
Status quo Supreme Court precedent does not grant standing to those wishing to file suits based on potential harms to future generations
Mank 9 – Bradford, Professor of Law, University of Cincinnati College of Law ~34 Colum. J. Envtl. L. 1, LEXIS~cn Many issues, especially potential environmental catastrophes caused by climate change, affect not just AND plaintiff who seeks only to protect the rights or interests of future generations.
Ruling on launch on warning gives the Court a solid case to establish a precedent in favor of intergenerational justice
Johnson 87 – Clifford, professor in Physics and Astronomy at the University of Southern California ~Spring, http://cpsr.org/prevsite/publications/newsletters/old/1980s/Spring1987.txt/~~cn The Nunn-Warner group’s work in some areas, notably including test ban proposals AND as Justice Goldberg observed: "The Constitution is not a suicide pact."
Posterity Clause ruling on the plan establishes intergenerational standing that solves warming
Davidson 3 – John Edward, J.D., Professor of Constitutional Law, Pioneer Pacific College; Senior Research Fellow, Constitutional Law Foundation ~"Tomorrow’s Standing Today: How the Equitable Jurisdiction Clause of Article III, Section 2 Confers Standing Upon Future Generations," 28 Colum. J. Envtl. L. 185, LEXIS~cn We deplete freshwater aquifers many times faster than nature can replenish them. 4 We AND rights in the absence of any more specific congressional authorization than 1331. 26
Plan
Plan: United States federal judiciary should substantially increase judicial restrictions on the President’s authority to introduce armed forces into hostilities by holding that policies that allow the United States to launch a retaliatory nuclear attack before a nuclear detonation in the United States are unconstitutional under the Posterity Clause because these policies represent an unacceptable risk of irreversible damage to the rights of future generations.
Solvency
Self-interest and normative pressure means the executive will comply with Court decisions
Pildes 12 – Richard, Sulder Family Professor of Constitutional Law at the NYU School of Law and the Co-Director of the NYU Center on Law and Security ~"Book Review: Law and the President", Harvard Law Review, April, 125 Harv. L. Rev. 1381, Lexis~cs The Incomplete Consequentialist Theory for the Role of Law For these reasons, I want AND distinction that seems of limited pragmatic significance, as the next Part shows.
3/13/14
NDT ROUND 4---1AC
Tournament: Ndt | Round: 4 | Opponent: West Georgia Ard-Muhammad | Judge: Cook, Corrigan, Taylor
Plan
Plan: United States federal judiciary should substantially increase judicial restrictions on the President’s authority to introduce armed forces into hostilities by holding that policies that allow the United States to launch a retaliatory nuclear attack before a nuclear detonation in the United States are unconstitutional under the Posterity Clause because these policies represent an unacceptable risk of irreversible damage to the rights of future generations.
Miscalc – 1AC
Advantage 1 is Miscalculation:
Miscalc is the only scenario for nuclear war
Evans 10 – Gareth, President and Chief Executive of the Brussels-based International Crisis Group, Report of the International Commission on Nuclear Non-proliferation and Disarmament ~"ELIMINATING NUCLEAR THREATS," ICNND, Online~cn Maintaining thousands of nuclear warheads on dangerously high launch on warning alert is the ultimate AND maker miscalculation should to an important degree be attributed to sheer luck.’
And it’s inevitable:
First, early warning glitches and human error
Phillips 26 Starr 4 – Alan, M.D., Cambridge physicist, radar researcher during WW2 , and Steven, nuclear engineer, medical technologist ~May/Jun, "Let’s go No-LOW," Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Vol 60: No 3~cn As long as the United States and Russia retain their arsenals of nuclear-armed AND systems may not only cease to provide redundancy—it may amplify mistakes.
Second, overlapping false alarms
Sennott 1 – Linn, Ph.D., Professor of Mathematics, Illinois State University ~http://www-ee.stanford.edu/~~hellman/Breakthrough/book/chapters/sennott.html~~cn Data made available by the American government under its Freedom of Information Act show that AND false alarm rates are one hundred per year for both satellites and radars.
Third, short decision-making times
Barrett 13 – Anthony, PhD in Engineering and Public Policy from Carnegie Mellon University AND BS in Political Science from Columbia and Research Assistant at Global Catastrophic Risk Institute ~June 28, Analyzing and Reducing the Risks of Inadvertent Nuclear War Between the United States and Russia~cs Attack indicators may or may not be resolved (identified as a false alarm) AND error-prone LOW posture during periods of high tensions or crisis.34
And fourth, deliberate cyber-attacks on early warning systems
Fritz 9 – Jason, radar signaling specialist, International Commission on Nuclear Nonproliferation and Disarmament ~Jul 30, http://www.ifap.ru/pr/2009/n090730a.pdf~~cn The US nuclear arsenal remains designed for the Cold War. This means its paramount AND in order to issue false voice commands (Andersen 2001, Chapter 16).
Miscalc sparks US-Russia war and causes extinction
——Weather, computer chips, wild animals, training tapes, intentional manipulation Barrett 13 – Anthony, PhD in Engineering and Public Policy from Carnegie Mellon University AND BS in Political Science from Columbia and Research Assistant at Global Catastrophic Risk Institute ~June 28, Analyzing and Reducing the Risks of Inadvertent Nuclear War Between the United States and Russia~cs War involving significant fractions of the U.S. and Russian nuclear arsenals, AND making one or both nations more likely to misinterpret events as attacks. 16
Only U.S.-Russian nuclear exchange affects the whole world – would actually cause extinction
Phillips 3 – Alan, M.D., Cambridge physicist, radar researcher for the British during WW2 ~Jun, http://www.web.net/~~cnanw/nolowinterview.htm~~cn That’s a really important comparison to make. The probability of either one of the AND few generations would gradually waste away, and the species might be finished.
Extinction should be the priority – it ends all future human life and potential and renders current successes obsolete
Matheny 7 – Jason, Department of Health Policy and Management, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins ~"Reducing the Risk of Human Extinction," Risk Analysis, Vol. 27, No. 5~cn Discussing the risks of "nuclear winter," Carl Sagan (1983) wrote: AND on the extinction risks we face and the costs of mitigating them.20
The past is not predictive – close calls prove the risk of accidental war is high
Sagan 93 – Scott, professor of political science and co-director of the Center for International Security and Cooperation ~"The limits of safety: Organizations, accidents, and nuclear weapons" pp. 11-12~cn One possibility is to assume that this central fact proves that the danger of nuclear AND —even an apparently perfect final safety record may not inspire extreme confidence.
Retaliatory Launch Only After Detonation, or RLOAD, solves nuclear miscalc
Phillips 26 Starr 7 – Alan, M.D., Cambridge physicist, radar researcher during WW2 , and Steven, nuclear engineer, medical technologist ~Jan 8, http://www.worldfederalistscanada.org/rload/Replace_LoW_Policy_8Jan.pdf~~cn Replacing LoW with RLOAD would require, in the American system, feeding any positive AND the predicted time of arrival, the crews would revert to peacetime readiness.
This specific scenario methodology is good – they aren’t roleplaying simulations – even if they win our scenarios aren’t likely, they are good pedagogically
Mahnken and Junio 13 – Thomas, PhD, Jerome E. Levy Chair of Economic Geography and National Security at the U.S. Naval War College and a Visiting Scholar at the Philip Merrill Center for Strategic Studies at The Johns Hopkins University’s Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, and Timothy, Predoctoral Fellow, Center for International Security and Cooperation, Stanford University, PhD in Political Science expected 2013 ~"Conceiving of Future War: The Promise of Scenario Analysis for International Relations," International Studies Review Volume 15, Issue 3, pages 374–395, September 2013~cs Scenarios offer many of the same benefits as simulations, recently a hot topic in AND to bring deductive logic to bear to assess the boundaries of the scenario.
Specifically true for nuclear miscalc
Mahnken and Junio 13 – Thomas, PhD, Jerome E. Levy Chair of Economic Geography and National Security at the U.S. Naval War College and a Visiting Scholar at the Philip Merrill Center for Strategic Studies at The Johns Hopkins University’s Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, and Timothy, Predoctoral Fellow, Center for International Security and Cooperation, Stanford University, PhD in Political Science expected 2013 ~"Conceiving of Future War: The Promise of Scenario Analysis for International Relations," International Studies Review Volume 15, Issue 3, pages 374–395, September 2013~cs Scenarios are a useful method for theory building and research design for topics that, AND low-probability process if it begins to happen in the real world.
Warming – 1AC
Advantage 2 is Warming
Warming is anthropogenic – this is the culmination of almost a 12,000 studies
Cook 13 – John, Global Change Institute, University of Queensland, Australia ~15 May, Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scienti?c literature. Environ. Res. Lett. 8 (2013) 024024 (7pp)~cs We analyze the evolution of the scienti?c consensus on anthropogenic global warming (AGW) AND the consensus on AGW is a vanishingly small proportion of the published research.
But, it’s not irreversible yet – there is no leg between cuts and response
Desjardins 13 – Clea, member of Concordia university Media Relations Department, academic writer, citing Damon Matthews; associate professor of the Department of Geography, Planning and Environment at Concordia University, PhD, Member of the Global Environmental and Climate Change Center ~"Global Warming: Irreversible but Not Inevitable,"~cs There is a persistent misconception among both scientists and the public that there is a AND mitigation challenge, clarifying these points of hope is critical to motivate change."
Warming turns every impact and causes extinction – adaptation isn’t possible to 4 degrees
Roberts 13 – David, Grist *citing the World Bank comprehensive climate study ~Jan 10, http://grist.org/climate-energy/climate-alarmism-the-idea-is-surreal/~~cs What would 4 degrees look like? A recent World Bank review of the science AND "alarmist" in this context. What level of alarm is adequate?
Our framing of warming overcomes disbelief and mobilizes public responses
Romm 12 – Joe, Ph.D. in physics from MIT, Fellow at American Progress and is the editor of Climate Progress, acting assistant secretary of energy for energy efficiency and renewable energy in 1997, Time named him a "Hero of the Environment? and "The Web’s most influential climate-change blogger." ~"Apocalypse Not: The Oscars, The Media And The Myth of ’Constant Repetition of Doomsday Messages’ on Climate", http://thinkprogress.org/romm/2012/02/26/432546/apocalypse-not-oscars-media-myth-of-repetition-of-doomsday-messages-on-climate/~~23more-432546~~cs The two greatest myths about global warming communications are 1) constant repetition of doomsday AND by most of the rest of the media, intelligentsia and popular culture.
Status quo Supreme Court precedent does not grant standing to those wishing to file suits based on potential harms to future generations
Mank 9 – Bradford, Professor of Law, University of Cincinnati College of Law ~34 Colum. J. Envtl. L. 1, LEXIS~cn Many issues, especially potential environmental catastrophes caused by climate change, affect not just AND plaintiff who seeks only to protect the rights or interests of future generations.
Ruling on LOW establishes a precedent for Intergenerational Justice
Rendall 7 – Matthew, Lecturer in Politics and International Relations at the University of Nottingham ~Dec 6, Nuclear Weapons and Intergenerational Exploitation, Security Studies, 16:4, 525-554~cs If this is a Faustian bargain, it is an odd one. If the AND fall against us, and with enough time, in a big way.
Ruling on the Posterity Clause is key to codify that precedent – sets up a framework to solve warming
Davidson 3 – John Edward, J.D., Professor of Constitutional Law, Pioneer Pacific College; Senior Research Fellow, Constitutional Law Foundation ~"Tomorrow’s Standing Today: How the Equitable Jurisdiction Clause of Article III, Section 2 Confers Standing Upon Future Generations," 28 Colum. J. Envtl. L. 185, LEXIS~cn We deplete freshwater aquifers many times faster than nature can replenish them. 4 We AND rights in the absence of any more specific congressional authorization than 1331. 26
Solvency
Launch On Warning is still in place
Gronlund 14 – Lisbeth, Co-director of Global Security at Union of Concerned Scientists, Physicist, expert on technical issues related to U.S. nuclear weapons policy, and new nuclear weapons, space weapons, and ballistic missile defenses ~Jan 17, http://blog.ucsusa.org/drugs-lies-cheating-nuclear-missiles-378~~cs These misadventures demonstrate that this system—like all systems—is fallible. But AND the policy remains unchanged. President Obama, what are you waiting for?
Vote aff to withdraw your consent from Launch on Warning – even if this doesn’t translate into concrete policy change, this move can reclaim our ethical and political agency in the face of the nuclear state
Rivers 2 – Dennis, Nuclear Age Peace Foundation ~Mar 30, http://www.coopcomm.org/nonukes/declaration.pdf~~cn There are other serious problems with the mere possession of nuclear weapons, even before AND study, reflect, pray and join me in making such a statement.
"Root cause" arguments are inaccurate and dangerous – combining strategies is key
Martin 90 – Brian, Professor at the University of Wollongong ~Uprooting War, http://www.uow.edu.au/arts/sts/bmartin/pubs/90uw/index.html~~cn War does not have a single root In this chapter and in the six preceding AND the roots of war and developing strategies for grassroots movements to uproot them.
Abandoning state reforms causes worse forces to fill-in
Barbrook 97 – Dr. Richard, Professor of Social Sciences, University of Westminister ~Jun 5, http://www.nettime.org/Lists-Archives/nettime-l-9706/msg00034.html~~gw I thought that this position is clear from my remarks about the ultra-left AND can be a fun artistic pose. However, human suffering is not.
3/29/14
NDT ROUND 4---WHITENESSSETTLERISM K
Tournament: Ndt | Round: 4 | Opponent: West Georgia Ard-Muhammad | Judge: Cook, Corrigan, Taylor
2AC
Reps
Discussion of nukes key - Effective nuclear public sphere is key to effective nuclear policies – the aff is a DA to the alt
Taylor and Henry 8 – Bryan, Associate Professor of Communiations at the Univeristy of Colorado-Boulder and Judith, Lecturer in the Department of Communication and Journalism at the University of New Mexico ~Insisting on Persisting: The Nuclear Rhetoric of "Stockpile Stewardship", Rhetoric 26 Public Affairs Vol. 11, No. 2, MUSE~cs What then, we may ask, does this debate portend for the future of AND of informed exchange that might result in more constructive ~nuclear~ policies."
Their link is nothing but an omission – RLOAD is not an endorsement
Phillips 3 – Alan, M.D., Cambridge physicist, radar researcher for the British during WW2 ~Jun, http://www.web.net/~~cnanw/nolowinterview.htm~~cn Q17: There’s an ethical question here that is apparent, and I think the AND on warning" to "no launch on warning" at a stroke.
Rejecting state reform ignores the historical successes of multiple oppressed groups and ensures no change occurs
Collins 97 – Patricia Hill, professor of sociology at the University of Cincinnati ~Fighting Words, p. 135-136~cn In this sense, postmodern views of power that overemphasize hegemony and local politics provide AND even the vocabulary of protest and rightful demand" (1993, 13).
For better or worse, the State does create racial disparities, so it’s very important as a site of resistance –presupposing that all State action perpetuates racism ensures their struggle backfires
Lee 94 – Jayne Chong-Soon, J.S.M. – Stanford Law School and JD – UCLA School of Law ~"Navigating the Topology of Race", Stanford Law Review, February, 46 Stan. L. Rev. 747, Lexis~cn Along similar lines, we may ask how the law constructs and legitimates racial differences AND we navigate this discursive ground is the primary inquiry of this review essay.
It’s try or die for legal positivism
Finnis 96 – Professor of Law at Oxford and Notre Dame ~John, "The Truth in Legal Positivism," in The Autonomy of Law, ed. Robert P. George. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 195-214~cs ’There is a necessary or conceptual connection between law and morality.’ True AND moral force to those parts of its positive law which are morally acceptable.¶
The law is indeterminate and is no means perfect, but the alternative is worse—we should recognize the constraints of the law and use that to construct better legal strategies
Margulies and Metcalf 11, Clinical Professor of Law ("Terrorizing Academia" http://www.swlaw.edu/pdfs/jle/jle603jmarguilies.pdf, Joseph Margulies is a Clinical Professor, Northwestern University School of Law. He was counsel of record for the petitioners in Rasul v. Bush and Munaf v. Geren. He now is counsel of record for Abu Zubaydah, for whose torture (termed harsh interrogation by some) Bush Administration officials John Yoo and Jay Bybee wrote authorizing legal opinions. Earlier versions of this paper were presented at workshops at the American Bar Foundation and the 2010 Law and Society Association Conference in Chicago. Margulies expresses his thanks in particular to Sid Tarrow, AzizHuq, BaherAzmy, Hadi Nicholas Deeb, Beth Mertz, Bonnie Honig, and Vicki Jackson.Hope Metcalf is a Lecturer, Yale Law School. Metcalf is co-counsel for the plaintiffs/petitioners in Padilla v. Rumsfeld, Padilla v. Yoo, Jeppesen v. Mohammed, and Maqaleh v. Obama. She has written numerous amicus briefs in support of petitioners in suits against the government arising out of counterterrorism policies, including in Munaf v. Geren and Boumediene v. Bush. Metcalf expresses her thanks to Muneer Ahmad, Stella Burch Elias, Margot Mendelson, Jean Koh Peters, and Judith Resnik for their feedback, as well as to co-teachers Jonathan Freiman, RamziKassem, Harold HongjuKoh and Michael Wishnie, whose dedication to clients, students and justice continues to inspire., Journal of Legal Education, Volume 60, Number 3 (February 2011))
V. Conclusions and Implications From the vantage of 2010, it appears the interventionist position—our position— AND to believe that law, in an intensely legalistic society, was enough.
Wilderson is incredibly essentializing and provides no tenable alt
BÂ 11 (Dr. Saër Maty, Professor of Film – University of Portsmouth and Co-Editor – The Encyclopedia of Global Human Migration, "The US Decentred: From Black Social Death to Cultural Transformation", Cultural Studies Review, 17(2), September, p. 385-387)
A few pages into Red, White and Black, I feared that it would AND such an undertaking? The coffle approaches with its answers in tow.’
If their arg is so anti-State that we can’t use fiat to rip-down the State, then that’s overly-pessimistic and silly. This specifically solves their slavery args.
James ’9 – Assistant Professor in the Philosophy Department at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte (Robin M, Autonomy, Universality, and Playing the Guitar: On the Politics and Aesthetics of Contemporary Feminist Deployments of the "Master’s Tools", April 14, DOI: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2009.01033.x)
In these two instances of successful reappropriation of the master’s tools—autonomy/universality AND ," and playing the guitar) can indeed bring down the master’s house.
No social death – history proves
Brown 9 Vincent Brown, Prof. of History and African and African-American Studies @ Harvard Univ., December 2009, "Social Death and Political Life in the Study of Slavery," American Historical Review, p. 1231-1249
THE PREMISE OF ORLANDO PATTERSON’S MAJOR WORK, that enslaved Africans were natally alienated and AND social personhood, or identity, and of resistance to slavery itself. 35 Scholars of slave resistance have never had much use for the concept of social death AND had arrived in the Americas bearing much more than their "tropical temperament." The cultural continuity and resistance schools of thought come together pow- erfully in an AND of becoming ’African American’ in culture, orientation, and identity."40
Their argument elevates white supremacy to an all-pervasive force that explains nearly all global oppression—-this conceptual expansion hides the actual practice of racism and makes breaking it down more difficult
ANDERSEN 3 – Margaret L. Andersen, Professor of Sociology and Women’s Studies and Vice Provost for Academic Affairs at the University of Delaware, 2003, "Whitewashing Race: A Critical Perspective on Whiteness," in White Out: The Continuing Significance of Racism, ed Doane 26 Bonilla-Silva, p. 28
Conceptually, one of the major problems in the whiteness literature is the reification of AND come to mean just about everything, it ends up meaning hardly anything.
This notion flies in the face of what so many on the left extrapolate from AND to purport. "The world needs the Black position," Wilderson said.
WIlderson’s hard ontological descriptions make fatalism inevitable - ~if they win their ontological arguments, there is no reason why any ontic action could ever reverse it~
Bâ (teaches film at Portsmouth University (UK). He researches ’race’, the ’postcolonial’, diaspora, the transnational and film ’genre’, African and Caribbean cinemas and film festivals) 11 (Saër Maty, The US Decentred, Cultural Studies Review, volume 17 number 2 September 2011)
In chapter nine, ’"Savage" Negrophobia’, he writes: The philosophical anxiety AND undertaking? The coffleapproaches with its answers in tow.’ (340)
Plan: United States federal judiciary should substantially increase judicial restrictions on the President’s authority to introduce armed forces into hostilities by holding that policies that allow the United States to launch a retaliatory nuclear attack before a nuclear detonation in the United States are unconstitutional under the Posterity Clause because these policies represent an unacceptable risk of irreversible damage to the rights of future generations.
Miscalc – 1AC
Advantage 1 is Miscalculation:
Miscalc is the only scenario for nuclear war
Evans 10 – Gareth, President and Chief Executive of the Brussels-based International Crisis Group, Report of the International Commission on Nuclear Non-proliferation and Disarmament ~"ELIMINATING NUCLEAR THREATS," ICNND, Online~cn Maintaining thousands of nuclear warheads on dangerously high launch on warning alert is the ultimate AND maker miscalculation should to an important degree be attributed to sheer luck.’
And it’s inevitable:
First, early warning glitches and human error
Phillips 26 Starr 4 – Alan, M.D., Cambridge physicist, radar researcher during WW2 , and Steven, nuclear engineer, medical technologist ~May/Jun, "Let’s go No-LOW," Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Vol 60: No 3~cn As long as the United States and Russia retain their arsenals of nuclear-armed AND systems may not only cease to provide redundancy—it may amplify mistakes.
Second, overlapping false alarms
Sennott 1 – Linn, Ph.D., Professor of Mathematics, Illinois State University ~http://www-ee.stanford.edu/~~hellman/Breakthrough/book/chapters/sennott.html~~cn Data made available by the American government under its Freedom of Information Act show that AND false alarm rates are one hundred per year for both satellites and radars.
Third, short decision-making times
Barrett 13 – Anthony, PhD in Engineering and Public Policy from Carnegie Mellon University AND BS in Political Science from Columbia and Research Assistant at Global Catastrophic Risk Institute ~June 28, Analyzing and Reducing the Risks of Inadvertent Nuclear War Between the United States and Russia~cs Attack indicators may or may not be resolved (identified as a false alarm) AND error-prone LOW posture during periods of high tensions or crisis.34
And fourth, deliberate cyber-attacks on early warning systems
Fritz 9 – Jason, radar signaling specialist, International Commission on Nuclear Nonproliferation and Disarmament ~Jul 30, http://www.ifap.ru/pr/2009/n090730a.pdf~~cn The US nuclear arsenal remains designed for the Cold War. This means its paramount AND in order to issue false voice commands (Andersen 2001, Chapter 16).
Miscalc sparks US-Russia war and causes extinction
——Weather, computer chips, wild animals, training tapes, intentional manipulation Barrett 13 – Anthony, PhD in Engineering and Public Policy from Carnegie Mellon University AND BS in Political Science from Columbia and Research Assistant at Global Catastrophic Risk Institute ~June 28, Analyzing and Reducing the Risks of Inadvertent Nuclear War Between the United States and Russia~cs War involving significant fractions of the U.S. and Russian nuclear arsenals, AND making one or both nations more likely to misinterpret events as attacks. 16
Russia’s war plans ensures they’ll retaliate
Thompson 9 – Nicholas, senior editor of Wired ~Sept 21, "Inside the Apocalyptic Soviet Doomsday Machine," Wired~cn "The Perimeter system is very, very nice," he says. "We AND . After all, he says, Dead Hand is continuously being upgraded.
The past is not predictive – close calls prove the risk of accidental war is high
Sagan 93 – Scott, professor of political science and co-director of the Center for International Security and Cooperation ~"The limits of safety: Organizations, accidents, and nuclear weapons" pp. 11-12~cn One possibility is to assume that this central fact proves that the danger of nuclear AND —even an apparently perfect final safety record may not inspire extreme confidence.
India and Pakistan model the U.S.
Mian 2 – Zia, Physicist at Princeton and Frank Hippel, Professor of Public and International Affairs at Princeton ~"U.S.-Russian Lessons for South Asia". August 2, 2002. Foreign Policy in Focus. http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/437~~cs The current South Asian crisis seems to have ebbed, but the underlying dynamic remains AND Russia instead of sending them forward in a threatening manner—as it does
India and Pakistan draw from US-Russia Cold War plans – multiple factors make miscalc extremely likely
Grossman 13 – Elaine M., Global Security Newswire ~April 3, Pakistan’s Military Sanguine on Avoiding Wartime Nuclear Calamity~cs "It’s a crisis-prone relationship," said Maleeha Lodhi, a former Pakistani AND … appears greater than a deliberate command decision to cross the nuclear threshold."
Retaliatory Launch Only After Detonation, or RLOAD, solves nuclear miscalc
Phillips 26 Starr 7 – Alan, M.D., Cambridge physicist, radar researcher during WW2 , and Steven, nuclear engineer, medical technologist ~Jan 8, http://www.worldfederalistscanada.org/rload/Replace_LoW_Policy_8Jan.pdf~~cn Replacing LoW with RLOAD would require, in the American system, feeding any positive AND the predicted time of arrival, the crews would revert to peacetime readiness.
RLOAD bans launches based on false alarm – first strikes don’t take out our solvency
Starr 9 – Steven, senior scientist with Physicians for Social Responsibility; Director of Clinical Laboratory Science Program, University of Missouri-Columbia; Areas of Expertise: Taking nuclear weapons off high-alert status ~"New Terms for a Common Understanding of De-Alerting," http://www.nucleardarkness.org/highalert/~~23_ftn8~~cn Preemptive Launch is the unambiguous AND also prevent the launch of nuclear weapons in reaction to an incoming strike of conventional warheads.14
Warming – 1AC
Advantage 2 is Warming
Warming is anthropogenic – this is the culmination of almost a 12,000 studies
Cook 13 – John, Global Change Institute, University of Queensland, Australia ~15 May, Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scienti?c literature. Environ. Res. Lett. 8 (2013) 024024 (7pp)~cs We analyze the evolution of the scienti?c consensus on anthropogenic global warming (AGW) AND the consensus on AGW is a vanishingly small proportion of the published research.
And, warming is speeding up – negative feedbacks and CO2 good arguments have been disproven
Artic Permafrost, Less land-based absorption of CO2, winds expose deep water layers, vegetation, wildfires Lyderson 9 – Kari, Washington Post ~Feb 15, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/14/AR2009021401757.html~~cn The pace of global warming is likely to be much faster than recent predictions, AND past are likely to become drier as temperatures rise, growing more vulnerable.
But, it’s not irreversible yet – there is no leg between cuts and response
Desjardins 13 – Clea, member of Concordia university Media Relations Department, academic writer, citing Damon Matthews; associate professor of the Department of Geography, Planning and Environment at Concordia University, PhD, Member of the Global Environmental and Climate Change Center ~"Global Warming: Irreversible but Not Inevitable,"~cs There is a persistent misconception among both scientists and the public that there is a AND mitigation challenge, clarifying these points of hope is critical to motivate change."-http://www.concordia.ca/now/what-we-do/research/20130402/global-warming-irreversible-but-not-inevitable.php)
Warming makes oceans acidic – the impact is extinction
Kristof 6 – Nicholas, New York Times, American journalist, author, op-ed columnist, and a winner of two Pulitzer Prizes ~Jul, "Scandal Below the Surface," Online~cn If you think of the earth’s surface as a great beaker, then it’s filled AND . We stand, so to speak, on the shoulders of plankton.
Status quo Supreme Court precedent does not grant standing to those wishing to file suits based on potential harms to future generations
Mank 9 – Bradford, Professor of Law, University of Cincinnati College of Law ~34 Colum. J. Envtl. L. 1, LEXIS~cn Many issues, especially potential environmental catastrophes caused by climate change, affect not just AND plaintiff who seeks only to protect the rights or interests of future generations.
Ruling on LOW establishes a precedent for Intergenerational Justice
Rendall 7 – Matthew, Lecturer in Politics and International Relations at the University of Nottingham ~Dec 6, Nuclear Weapons and Intergenerational Exploitation, Security Studies, 16:4, 525-554~cs If this is a Faustian bargain, it is an odd one. If the AND fall against us, and with enough time, in a big way.
Ruling on the Posterity Clause is key to codify that precedent – sets up a framework to solve warming
Davidson 3 – John Edward, J.D., Professor of Constitutional Law, Pioneer Pacific College; Senior Research Fellow, Constitutional Law Foundation ~"Tomorrow’s Standing Today: How the Equitable Jurisdiction Clause of Article III, Section 2 Confers Standing Upon Future Generations," 28 Colum. J. Envtl. L. 185, LEXIS~cn We deplete freshwater aquifers many times faster than nature can replenish them. 4 We AND rights in the absence of any more specific congressional authorization than 1331. 26
Solvency
Launch On Warning is still in place
Gronlund 14 – Lisbeth, Co-director of Global Security at Union of Concerned Scientists, Physicist, expert on technical issues related to U.S. nuclear weapons policy, and new nuclear weapons, space weapons, and ballistic missile defenses ~Jan 17, http://blog.ucsusa.org/drugs-lies-cheating-nuclear-missiles-378~~cs-http://blog.ucsusa.org/drugs-lies-cheating-nuclear-missiles-3785dcs These misadventures demonstrate that this system—like all systems—is fallible. But AND the policy remains unchanged. President Obama, what are you waiting for?
Bradley and Morrison 13 – Curtis, Professor of Law at Duke and Trevor, Professor of Law at Columbia ~"Presidential Power, Historical Practice, And Legal Constraint" Duke Law Scholarship Repository, http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=545126context=faculty_scholarship~~cs Insisting on a sharp distinction between the law governing presidential authority that is subject to AND than an internal sense of fidelity to law (or judicial review).120
Multiple past de-alerting measures disprove their links