General Actions:
Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Video | Edit/Delete |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Csun | 2 | Southern California Overing-Panchal | Spring |
| ||||
Csun | 3 | Weber State Auro-Mugweh | Parker |
| ||||
Csun | 5 | Cal State Fullerton Rodriguez-Su | kovacs |
| ||||
Districts | 3 | Sacramento State Hampton-Bruce-Golsch | Peters |
| ||||
Fullerton | 1 | Harvard Taylor-Dimitrijevic | Bagwell |
| ||||
Fullerton | 3 | Michigan State Gannon-Hodgman | Quigley |
| ||||
Fullerton | 6 | Oklahoma Massey-Maddy | Davis |
| ||||
Shirley | 1 | Oklahoma Leonardi-Masterson | Cheek |
| ||||
Shirley | 4 | Weber State Alvarado-Hendricks | Tews |
| ||||
Shirley | 6 | Missouri - Kansas City Jones-Worrell | Munday |
| ||||
UMKC | 1 | Texas DS | Corey Stone |
| ||||
UMKC | 8 | Missouri State Hackett-Rabbitt | Russell |
| ||||
UMKC | 5 | UT San Antonio Colwell-Robertson | Girouard |
| ||||
UNLV | 1 | Baylor Sheaff-Walmsley | Guevara |
| ||||
UNLV | 4 | Whitman College Lassiter-Thompson | Feldman |
| ||||
Usc | 1 | Georgetown Erpenbach-McGrath | Zendeh |
| ||||
Usc | 3 | Cal State Fullerton Rosa-Saipramouk | McBride |
|
Tournament | Round | Report |
---|---|---|
Csun | 2 | Opponent: Southern California Overing-Panchal | Judge: Spring 1AC - Drones - Democratic engagement - Targeted killing |
Csun | 3 | Opponent: Weber State Auro-Mugweh | Judge: Parker 1NC - Framework Antipolitics Terrorism Turn and case |
Csun | 5 | Opponent: Cal State Fullerton Rodriguez-Su | Judge: kovacs 1AC - Borders |
Districts | 3 | Opponent: Sacramento State Hampton-Bruce-Golsch | Judge: Peters 1NC - T Nietzche Impact turns |
Fullerton | 1 | Opponent: Harvard Taylor-Dimitrijevic | Judge: Bagwell 1NC - T Armed Forces XO Prolif K Politics Case - Prolif Good |
Fullerton | 3 | Opponent: Michigan State Gannon-Hodgman | Judge: Quigley 1NC - Framework Case |
Fullerton | 6 | Opponent: Oklahoma Massey-Maddy | Judge: Davis 1NC - Framework Neoliberalism Case |
Shirley | 1 | Opponent: Oklahoma Leonardi-Masterson | Judge: Cheek 1NC - Framework Anti-politics Neolib |
Shirley | 4 | Opponent: Weber State Alvarado-Hendricks | Judge: Tews 1NC - Framework Neolib Anti-politics |
Shirley | 6 | Opponent: Missouri - Kansas City Jones-Worrell | Judge: Munday 1NC - T-Armed Forces Uniqueness CP Iran Politics Case Turns |
UMKC | 1 | Opponent: Texas DS | Judge: Corey Stone 1AC - Drones |
UMKC | 8 | Opponent: Missouri State Hackett-Rabbitt | Judge: Russell Same 1NC and same block as Round 1 UMKC |
UMKC | 5 | Opponent: UT San Antonio Colwell-Robertson | Judge: Girouard 1NC - Framework Antipolitics Heg turns |
UNLV | 1 | Opponent: Baylor Sheaff-Walmsley | Judge: Guevara 1NC - T-modify Politics Cyber deterrence XO CP |
UNLV | 4 | Opponent: Whitman College Lassiter-Thompson | Judge: Feldman 1AC - Drones - I Norms and Pakistan |
Usc | 1 | Opponent: Georgetown Erpenbach-McGrath | Judge: Zendeh 1NC - CIR Politics XO Prez Powers Case |
Usc | 3 | Opponent: Cal State Fullerton Rosa-Saipramouk | Judge: McBride 1NC - Framework Neoliberalism Case |
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Entry | Date |
---|---|
1NC CIR Politics - USCTournament: Usc | Round: 1 | Opponent: Georgetown Erpenbach-McGrath | Judge: Zendeh CIR Will pass and its top of the docketJosh Lederman, Associated Press, 12-27-13 ("Obama’s 2014 agenda could be a race against the clock", http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/2013/12/obamas-2014-agenda-could-be-a-race-against-the-clock.html-http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/2013/12/obamas-2014-agenda-could-be-a-race-against-the-clock.html) Congressional restrictions kill PCAckerman and Hathaway 11 (Bruce and Oona, Sterling Professor of Law and Political Science, Yale Law School; Gerard C. and Bernice Latrobe Smith Professor of International Law, Yale Law School; LIMITED WAR AND THE CONSTITUTION: IRAQ AND THE CRISIS OF PRESIDENTIAL LEGALITY, 109 Mich. L. Rev. 447, lexis) Political capital sustains Boehner support for Immigration reformJuliet Eilperin; Karen Tumulty, The Washington Post , 12/11/13 ("Podesta, Schiliro to return to White House:" P. Nexis) Immigration reform expands skilled labor—Key to relationsLA Times 12 - ~Other countries eagerly await U.S. immigration reform, http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/world_now/2012/11/us-immigration-reform-eagerly-awaited-by-source-countries.html~~ "Comprehensive immigration reform will see expansion of skilled labor visas," predicted B. US-Indian relations avert South Asian nuclear warSchaffer 02 ~Spring 2002, Teresita—Director of the South Asia Program at the Center for Strategic and International Security, Washington Quarterly, Lexis~ | 2/17/14 |
1NC FrameworkTournament: Shirley | Round: 1 | Opponent: Oklahoma Leonardi-Masterson | Judge: Cheek Debate should be a site of political contestation where the affirmative should answer the resolutional question through macropolitical government actionThis form of debate is key to critical activism – debating both sides of hegemonic power structures empirically creates powerful liberal coalitionsGuilhot, research fellow – Social Science Research Council, prof sociology – LSE, ’5 The Resolution is the Stasis Point for deliberation – framing your advocacy in that context is key to contestation and meaningful debateSteinberg 26 Freeley 8 (Austin J. Freeley is a Boston based attorney who focuses on criminal, personal injury and civil rights law, AND David L. Steinberg , Lecturer of Communication Studies @ U Miami, Argumentation and Debate: Critical Thinking for Reasoned Decision Making pp45)
This year’s resolution offers a crucial opportunity for political engagement —- policy relevant debate about war powers decision-making is critical to hold the government accountable for their hypocrisy —- only engaging specific proposals and learning the language of the war-machine solvesEwan E. Mellor ~European University Institute, Political and Social Sciences, Graduate Student, Paper Prepared for BISA Conference 2013, "Why policy relevance is a moral necessity: Just war theory, impact, and UAVs"~ This section of the paper considers more generally the need for just war theorists to The aff undermines this goal —- by rejecting engagement with the presidency in favor of reliance on purely local politics they contribute to the decline of liberalism and the resurgence of conservative movementsMilkis et. al ’13, ~Sidney M. Milkis is the White Burkett For a time, LBJ’s "careful practicality" and moral leadership made him an Next is Dialogue. Debate’s critical axis is a form of dialogic communication within a confined game space.Unbridled affirmation outside the game space makes research impossible and destroys dialogue in debateHanghoj 8 Debate games are often based on pre-designed scenarios that include descriptions of issues Dialogue is the biggest impact—the process of discussion precedes any truth claim by magnifying the benefits of any discussionMorson 4 A belief in truly dialogic ideological becoming would lead to schools that were quite different | 2/8/14 |
1NC Iran Politics v UMKCTournament: Shirley | Round: 6 | Opponent: Missouri - Kansas City Jones-Worrell | Judge: Munday Sanctions won’t pass now but Obama’s PC is key to keep McCain opposedAbdi 11-15-2013 (Jamal, Policy Director, National Iranian American Council, Tide Turns Towards Diplomacy as Key Senators Oppose New Iran Sanctions, Huffington Post, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jamal-abdi/tide-turns-towards-diplom_b_4283626.html) Plan would be massively unpopular – Obama will oppose itCrook Arbitrator in NAFTA Case Western Law Review ’12 (John, "Presidential Powers and Foreign Affairs: The War Powers Resolution at 40: Still Controversial: The War Powers Resolution—A Dim and Fading Legacy," 45 Case W. Res. J. Int’l L. 157, Mike) Strikes cause extinctionNazemroaya 11 ~Research Associate at the Centre for Research on Globalization, Mahdi, "The Next World War: The "Great Game" and the Threat of Nuclear War," 1/10, Global Research~ Any attack on Iran will be a joint operation between Israel, the U. | 2/8/14 |
1NC Prolif KTournament: Fullerton | Round: 1 | Opponent: Harvard Taylor-Dimitrijevic | Judge: Bagwell The 1AC depicts proliferation as a spreading cancerous infection—this abstracted focus on the technological threat posed by nuclear weapons obscures the underlying motives for proliferation—results in poorly formed policy like safeguards that makes proliferation irresolvableMutimer, 00—Assistant Professor of Political Science at York University (The Weapons State, Questia) *~make sure to highlight the part of this card that talks about foreign nuclear power programs~ Representations of "proliferation" as a threat legitimize an unenforceable security paradox and displace concerns for justice—this relies on an ethnocentric and racialized view of third world peopleBiswas, 1 – Professor of Political Science at Whitman College (Shampa, Nuclear Apartheid" as Political Position: Race as a Postcolonial Resource? Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, Vol. 26, , Questia) The terminal impact’s extinction—a division of the world into the elect and the deviant privileges a mentality that sanctions genocidal apocalypseFasching, 93 – Professor of Religious Studies at University of South Florida (Darrell, The Ethical Challenge of Auschwitz and Hiroshima, p. 175-176) The Alternative is Renunciation—rather than projecting our fears upon the identities of another, we should criticize the existence of the bomb itself. The problem is not that it’s spreading, but that it exists. Vote negative to repudiate the existence of weapons of mass destruction.Gusterson, 99—Associate Professor of Anthropology and Science and Technology (Hugh, Nuclear Weapons and the Other in the Western Imagination, JSTOR, Cultural Anthropology 14(1):111-143) | 2/11/14 |
1NC Uniqueness CP v UMKCTournament: Shirley | Round: 6 | Opponent: Missouri - Kansas City Jones-Worrell | Judge: Munday Text: The United States federal government should statutorily increase the war powers authority of the President of the United States to engage in peacekeeping operations by: appropriating funds sufficient for the United States to fully pay its current United Nations peacekeeping assessments; permanently repealing the 25 cap on United States contributions to United Nations peacekeeping operations; supporting an increase in reimbursement rates for troop-committing countries; and supporting peacekeeping reforms directed at the Global Field Support Strategy.The CP ensures sustained peacekeeping operations and reverses the international negative signal toward the U.S.Enholm Executive Director of the Woodrow Wilson House and UN Expert ’11 (Robert, "U.S. Engagement in International Peacekeeping: From Aspiration to Implementation," http://globalsolutions.org/files/public/documents/U.S.-Engagement-in-International-Peacekeeping.pdf-http://globalsolutions.org/files/public/documents/U.S.-Engagement-in-International-Peacekeeping.pdf**, Mike) | 2/8/14 |
1NC XO CP v Georgetown EMTournament: Usc | Round: 1 | Opponent: Georgetown Erpenbach-McGrath | Judge: Zendeh The President of the United States should issue an executive order requiring the establishment of a quantum of information framework requiring a clear and convincing standard for targeted killing outside zones of active hostilities in order to comply with international laws of armed conflict. The Executive Branch of the United States federal government should repudiate legal interpretations which allowed unrestricted targeted killing outside of zones of active hostilities, and issue a Fact Sheet articulating its modified legal position.Internal checks are comparatively more effective than external restrictionsRadsan 2010 (Afsheen, Professor of Law, William Mitchell College of Law, BUSH AND OBAMA FIGHT TERRORISTS¶ OUTSIDE JUSTICE JACKSON’S TWILIGHT¶ ZONE, 26 Const. Comment. 551 2009-2010) Executive legal interpretation solves- the CP isn’t the SQ because it makes clear the basis of executive changesAnthony Dworkin 13, senior policy fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations, "Drones And Targeted Killing: Defining A European Position", July, http://ecfr.eu/page/-/ECFR84_DRONES_BRIEF.pdf-http://ecfr.eu/page/-/ECFR84_DRONES_BRIEF.pdf The Fact Sheet plank ensures public and international perception of compliance with accepted legal standardsNachber 2013 —- Law Professor at Virginia (Spring, Executive Branch Policy Meets International Law in the Evolution of the Domestic Law of Detention, Virginia Journal of International Law, 53 Va. J. Int’l L. 201, Lexis) | 2/17/14 |
1NC XO CP vs NFUTournament: Fullerton | Round: 1 | Opponent: Harvard Taylor-Dimitrijevic | Judge: Bagwell Text: The President of the United States should issue an executive order declaring that the sole purpose of its nuclear weapons is to deter and, if necessary, respond to nuclear attacks against ourselves or our alliesCP solves the whole caseFlitton 9 Diplomatic Editor of the Age, author on world affairs 12/16 (2009, Daniel, "The bomb squad", http://www.theage.com.au/national/the-bomb-squad-20091215-kuku.html-http://www.theage.com.au/national/the-bomb-squad-20091215-kuku.html) | 2/11/14 |
Anthro good v SacStateTournament: Districts | Round: 3 | Opponent: Sacramento State Hampton-Bruce-Golsch | Judge: Peters Their attempt to epistemologically rupture ensures a transition from rationalism to tradition- allowing eastern authoritarian modernity to fill inLeonardo de Arrizabalaga y Prado, 7-20-11 (Cambridge University, and taught at Tsukuba University, Japan. He has published many articles on the Roman emperor commonly but wrongly known as Elagabalus. , "Modernity’s best defence is liberal modernity itself", http://www.newsecuritylearning.com/index.php/feature/134-modernitys-best-defence-is-liberal-modernity-itself~-~-http://www.newsecuritylearning.com/index.php/feature/134-modernitys-best-defence-is-liberal-modernity-itself-) The alternatives to liberal modernity are worse- irrational ideologies fill inLeonardo de Arrizabalaga y Prado, 7-20-11 (Cambridge University, and taught at Tsukuba University, Japan. He has published many articles on the Roman emperor commonly but wrongly known as Elagabalus. , "Modernity’s best defence is liberal modernity itself", http://www.newsecuritylearning.com/index.php/feature/134-modernitys-best-defence-is-liberal-modernity-itself~-~-http://www.newsecuritylearning.com/index.php/feature/134-modernitys-best-defence-is-liberal-modernity-itself-) Representing human impacts is necessary to environmental ethicsPlumwood 2 (Val, PF PHILOSOPHY - UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY, Environmental Culture: The ecological crisis of reason, PG. 138-40) Environmental solutions must be sustainable—ignoring human needs means there will be an inevitable backlash that dismantles the alternativeFarber 99 (Daniel Professor of Law at the University of Minnesota. Eco-Pragmatism, Pg. 12-3.) Their approach entrenches patriarchy-ONLY HUMAN CENTEREDNESS solves the root cause Patriarchy causes war and turns the case Human centered approaches acknowledge behavior that is detrimental to the entire environment- checks any impact to the criticism. If anthropocentrism did imply the Dominion Thesis, that would, in my opinion, Humans are different from other animals – inevitably causes human-centerednessLee, Phil Prof @ Bloomsburg, 9 ~Wendy, Spring, "Restoring Human-Centeredness to Environmental Conscience: The Ecocentrist’s Dilemma, the Role of Heterosexualized Anthromorphizing, and the Significance of Language to Ecological Feminism" Ethics and the Environment, Vol 14, No 1, Project Muse~ 2 Philosophy of language and empirically oriented philosophies of mind/brain may offer the Human centeredness is the only ethical system and prevents the collapse of civilizationSchmahmann and Polacheck, legal rights lawyers, 1995 ~The Case Against Rights for Animals, 22 B.C. Environmental Aff. Law Review, 747~ These forms of doctrinaire "animal riehtism" ignore the value that society has placed The markets efficiency and civilization are necessary for space explorationMurphy , Phd Econ. NYU , 1-’5 ( Robert , "A Free Market In Space", Volume 26, Number 1 , Error! Hyperlink reference not valid. ) Exploration solves inevitable extinctionOberg, 99’ (James, Space Writer and former Space Flight Engineer, Space Power Theory, http://www.jamesoberg.com/books/spt/new-CHAPTERSw_figs.pdf) Life in some form is inevitable but human life is uniquely good—radical ecology makes extinction inevitable.Grey 93 — William Grey, Professor of Philosophy at the University of Queensland, 1993 ("Anthropocentrism and Deep Ecology," Australiasian Journal of Philosophy, Volume 71, Number 4, Available Online at http://www.uq.edu.au/~~pdwgrey/pubs/anthropocentrism.html, Accessed 07-27-2011) Rejecting Technological innovation dooms us to extinction Well, then let’s not do that, huh? Well, no, not | 2/22/14 |
Antipolitics DATournament: Csun | Round: 5 | Opponent: Cal State Fullerton Rodriguez-Su | Judge: kovacs University students engaging in policy implementation now is preventing the Right’s ascendancy—The AFF’s retreat from policy implementation chokes off effective solutions ensuring their advocacy is anti-politicalGitlin 5 (Todd formerly served as professor of sociology and director of the mass communications program at the University of California, Berkeley, and then a professor of culture, journalism and sociology at New York University. He is now a professor of journalism and sociology and chair of the Ph.D. program in Communications at Columbia University. He was a long-time political activist( from the Left). From the Book: The Intellectuals and the Flag – 200 – available via CIAO Books – date accessed 9/25/10 – http://www.ciaonet.org.proxy2.cl.msu.edu/book/git01/git01_04.pdf) Anti-politics causes extinction, turns the case, and destroys solvencyBoggs 97 (CARL BOGGS – Professor and Ph.D. Political Science, National University, Los Angeles — Theory and Society 26: 741-780) Only State-based, macro political approaches solve—The AFF is comparatively worseBronner 4 Stephen Eric Bronner, Distinguished Professor of Political Science and a Member of the Graduate Faculty in Comparative Literature and German Studies at Rutgers University, 2004 (Reclaiming the Enlightenment: Toward a Politics of Radical Engagement, Published by Columbia University Press, ISBN 9780231126090, p. 151-153) | 2/8/14 |
Case V Georgetown EMTournament: Usc | Round: 1 | Opponent: Georgetown Erpenbach-McGrath | Judge: Zendeh Even if it exists, government won’t take up the backlash-Consensus is on our sideWittes, 13 ~Benjamin, editor in chief of Lawfare and a Senior Fellow in Governance Studies at Brookings, author of several books and a member of the Hoover Institution’s Task Force on National Security and Law, 2/27, "In Defense of the Administration on Targeted Killing of Americans, Near-zero risk of accidental launch—their probability estimates are flawed.Smil 08 - Professor in the Faculty of Environment at the University of Manitoba, Vaclav, Global Catastrophes and Trends, p. 56-7 Nuclear terrorism has too many obstacles even if terrorists got accessClarke, 2013 ~Michael, Pakistan and Nuclear Terrorism: How Real is the Threat?, Comparative Strategy, Volume 32, Issue 2, 2013, Senior Fellow at Griffith Asia Institute at Griffith University~ No US precedent—-not causalKenneth Anderson 11, Professor of International Law at American University, 10/9/11, "What Kind of Drones Arms Race Is Coming?," http://www.volokh.com/2011/10/09/what-kind-of-drones-arms-race-is-coming/~~23more-51516-http://www.volokh.com/2011/10/09/what-kind-of-drones-arms-race-is-coming/ Zero chance that U.S. self-restraint causes any other country to give up their plans for dronesMax Boot 11, the Jeane J. Kirkpatrick Senior Fellow in National Security Studies at the Council on Foreign Relations, 10/9/11, "We Cannot Afford to Stop Drone Strikes," Commentary Magazine, http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2011/10/09/drone-arms-race/-http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2011/10/09/drone-arms-race/ No risk of drone wars- Wont escalateJoseph Singh 12, researcher at the Center for a New American Security, 8/13/12, "Betting Against a Drone Arms Race," http://nation.time.com/2012/08/13/betting-against-a-drone-arms-race/~~23ixzz2eSvaZnfQ China won’t use drones offensively Beijing, however, is unlikely to use its drones lightly. It already faces Japan-China Relations sustainableTakahara, Tokyo Foundation, 4-7-’11 (Akio, "Issues and Future Prospects for Japan-China Relations" http://www.tokyofoundation.org/en/articles/2011/Japan-China-Relations) Armenian Azerbaijan war empirically denied – they both have drones and have used them against each other already – To some extent, these countries are already being pulled towards conflict. Last September, Armenia shot down an Israeli-made Azerbaijani drone over Nagorno- | 2/17/14 |
Case V Oklahoma MMTournament: Fullerton | Round: 6 | Opponent: Oklahoma Massey-Maddy | Judge: Davis Essentialism DA—-The AFF’s claims of racism deny other systems of oppression creating an either/or dichotomy that is inherently masculine—-It denies validity to the claims of those who are not otherwise privileged turning the caseCollins 90 Patricia Hill, Associate Professor of African American Studies University of Cincinnati, Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment p. 225 Activism DA—-a. The Affirmative team are not activists—-Neither of them have done a single thing to forward their cause outside of the debate space but we’ve been taking steps to address neoliberal issues on our campus like the drones minor being implemented at UNLV—-We’re comparatively better activistsb. Vote Negative—-They provide a solution for the people instead of with and by the people—That causes cultural destruction turning the caseFreire 70 (Paulo, Educator and Philosopher, key theorist of Critical Pedegogy) Pedegogy of the Oppressed Continuum Publishing. New York London. Experience DA—-a. The 1AC’s critical pedagogy recreates a naïve and dangerous form of hegemonic knowledge—-Prioritization of experience and self-evidence devolves into a foundationalist view of knowledge production that privileges certain views over othersGur-Ze’ev 98, Senior Lecturer at the Faculty of Education, University of Haifa, Israel, 1998 (Ilan Gur-Ze’ev, "Toward a Non-Repressive Critical Pedagogy," http://construct.haifa.ac.il/~~ilangz/Critpe39.html) b. Their commitment to a certain positive utopia recreates normalizing educational practices and dehumanizes other victims of oppressionGur-Ze’ev 5, Senior Lecturer at the Faculty of Education, University of Haifa, Israel, 2005 (Ilan Gur-Ze’ev, "Critical Theory, Critical Pedagogy and Diaspora Today – Toward a New Critical Language in Education," construct.haifa.ac.il/~ilangz/critical-pedagogy-critical-theory.pdf) Speaking for others DA—-The AFF’s privileged social location makes any claim to political empowerment suspect—-It’s an act of commodification and colonial domination, turning the caseAlcoff 92 Linda Martín Alcoff (Department of Philosophy at Syracuse University. "The Problem of Speaking For Others" Cultural Critique Winter 1991-92, pp. 5-32.) Narratives DA—-Trading autobiographical narrative for the ballot commodifies one’s identity and has limited impact on the culture that one attempt’s to reform—-When autobiographical narrative "wins," it subverts its own most radical intentions by becoming an exemplar of the very culture under indictmentCoughlin 95—associate Professor of Law, Vanderbilt Law School. (Anne, REGULATING THE SELF: AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL PERFORMANCES IN OUTSIDER SCHOLARSHIP, 81 Va. L. Rev. 1229) Anti-Politics DA—-a. The AFF’s use of poetry fails to create political change—Ensures they’re anti-political and causes conservative takeoverDaniel 97 Jamie Owen Daniel, English Department, The University of Illinois at Chicago, "Does "poetry makes nothing happen?": The Case for Public Poetry as a Counter-Public Sphere", 1997, b. That spills over to the debate curriculum and guarantees the right maintain control—-Only pragmatic approaches solve—-Educational policy analysis provesPlank et al 94 et al, David N. Plank is Executive Director of Policy Analysis for California Education (PACE), an independent policy research center based at the University of California-Berkeley, Stanford University, and the University of Southern California. He was previously a professor at Michigan State University, where he founded and directed the Education Policy Center. He received his Ph.D. from the University of Chicago in 1983. American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 31, No. 2 (Summer, 1994), pp. 263-281 Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1163309 Multi-Dimensionality DA—-a. The AFF’s anti-racist scholars marginalize bodies affected by heteronormativity—-That causes violent exclusion and more racial oppression, turning the caseHutchinson 99 ~Darren Leonard, Assistant Professor, Southern Methodist University School of Law, "Ignoring the Sexualization of Race: Heteonormativity, Critical Race Theory and Anti-Racist Politics," Buffalo Law Review, Winter, 47 Buffalo L. Rev. 1, pg. lexis, ALB~ b. That prevents coalition building ensuring conservative organizations win—-Guarantees broader oppressionHutchinson 99 ~Darren Leonard, Assistant Professor, Southern Methodist University School of Law, "Ignoring the Sexualization of Race: Heteonormativity, Critical Race Theory and Anti-Racist Politics," Buffalo Law Review, Winter, 47 Buffalo L. Rev. 1, pg. lexis, ALB~ c. Gender inclusion fails—-The AFF’s intersectional analysis over privileges black feminism which excludes other bodies affected by the same forces from participating | 2/17/14 |
Case v CSUFTournament: Usc | Round: 3 | Opponent: Cal State Fullerton Rosa-Saipramouk | Judge: McBride (Anti-politics DA, Commodification, SFO from Oklahoma MMGod isn’t realHall and Hall 4 (Dr. Norman F. Hall and Dr. Lucia K. B. Hall, "Religion and skepticism: can (and should21) skeptics challenge religion?" http://www.talkreason.org/index.cfm?category=17 2004) Thermodynamics prove Claims of the supremacy of their methodology is the idolatrous sin of spiritual pride, which turns the ethical and moral claims of the affHeyer 2005 This provisional quality of our grasp on the fullness of God’s revelation and its directives Solvency Deficit—-The belief that humans are intrinsically above other animals means their Christian community will wreck the environmentElizabeth Mensch, Professor of Law, SUNY at Buffalo School of Law, and Alan Freeman, Professor of Law, SUNY at Buffalo School of Law, Spring 1991, Georgia Law Review, 25 Ga. L. Rev. 923, p. 946-47 And, it also turns the AFFRobert H. Nelson, professor of environmental policy at the School of Public Policy of the University of Maryland, Fall 2004, Case Western Reserve Law Review, 55 Case W. Res. 51, p. 67-68 Theology isn’t a trump card against evaluating the effects of the outcome – it’s both possible and good to evaluate theological arguments according to rational and logical standards. If we win solvency takeouts and disads to the aff, their Christian ethic can’t outweigh them.Robert H. Nelson, professor of environmental policy at the School of Public Policy of the University of Maryland, Fall 2004, Case Western Reserve Law Review, 55 Case W. Res. 51, p. 71-72 | 2/17/14 |
Case v CSUF BordersTournament: Csun | Round: 5 | Opponent: Cal State Fullerton Rodriguez-Su | Judge: kovacs The criticism of the limit of rationalism, universalism and objecitvity encourages epistemological pluralism – this is seized on by conservatives to justify and project their radical ideologies.Sherry 96 – Professor of Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Law and the University of Minnesota (Suzanna, Georgetown Law Journal, "The Sleep of Reason," February 1996, 84 Geo. L.J. 453 Enlightenment reason is necessary to prevent a new wave of domestic conflicts. Epistemological pluralism leads to power as the only legitimate means for resolving disputes. The affirmative cedes the political sphere to those in power.Sherry 96 – Professor of Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Law and the University of Minnesota (Suzanna, Georgetown Law Journal, "The Sleep of Reason," February 1996, 84 Geo. L.J. 453 Performance is not a mode of resistance - it gives too much power to the audience because the performer is structurally blocked from controlling the (re)presentation of their representations. Appealing to the ballot is a way of turning over one’s identity to the same reproductive economy that underwrites liberalismPhelan 96—chair of New York University’s Department of Performance Studies (Peggy, Unmarked: the politics of performance, ed published in the Taylor 26 Francis e-Library, 2005, 146 The very act of articulating why performance ought be attached to the ballot casts performance within the terms of liberalism’s discursive economy – this reduces their performance to a form of aesthetic formalism, this subordinates the political potential of performance to the narrow disciplinary concerns of academic knowledge productionPhelan ’96—chair of New York University’s Department of Performance Studies (Peggy, Unmarked: the politics of performance, ed published in the Taylor 26 Francis e-Library, 2005, Resistance/empowerment via the ballot can only instill an adaptive politics of being and effaces the institutional constraints that reproduce structural violenceBrown 95—prof at UC Berkely (Wendy, States of Injury, 21-3) For some, fueled by opprobrium toward regulatory norms or other mo- dalities of Trading autobiographical narrative for the ballot commodifies one’s identity and has limited impact on the culture that one attempt’s to reform – when autobiographical narrative "wins," it subverts its own most radical intentions by becoming an exemplar of the very culture under indictmentCoughlin 95—associate Professor of Law, Vanderbilt Law School. (Anne, REGULATING THE SELF: AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL PERFORMANCES IN OUTSIDER SCHOLARSHIP, 81 Va. L. Rev. 1229) Even if their best intention is to resist the liberal subject, autobiography is understood by its consuming audience as the assertion of the classic autonomous subject – this subverts the political potential of performance by rendering one’s experience legible to the terms of liberalism .Coughlin 95—associate Professor of Law, Vanderbilt Law School. (Anne, REGULATING THE SELF: AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL PERFORMANCES IN OUTSIDER SCHOLARSHIP, 81 Va. L. Rev. 1229) Although Williams is quick to detect insensitivity and bigotry in remarks made by strangers, Using personal experience to establish the legitimacy of argument essentializes difference. This prevents an analysis of the ideological systems that shape the construction of experienceJoan W. SCOTT is professor of social science at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, New Jersey, 91 ~"The Evidence of Experience," Critical Inquiry, Vol. 17, No. 4 (Summer, 1991), pp. 773-797, JSTOR~ When the evidence offered is the evidence of "experience," the claim for referentiality Their appeal to the experience of an oppressed identity to establish the authenticity of a political claim reinforces exclusion. Experience is defined in self-serving terms to eliminate questioning of its foundational status.Joan W. SCOTT is professor of social science at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, New Jersey, 91 ~"The Evidence of Experience," Critical Inquiry, Vol. 17, No. 4 (Summer, 1991), pp. 773-797, JSTOR~ The unifying aspect of experience excludes whole realms of human activity by simply not counting We should not use experience as the basis for authority. Exposing the existence of racist ideology on the basis of experience does not provide the means to undermine it. My experience of being oppressed doesn’t provide the path to getting outside oppression. If the only way to resist is based on experience of racist oppression, then there is no way to get outside of the system of racism.Joan W. SCOTT is professor of social science at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, New Jersey, 91 ~"The Evidence of Experience," Critical Inquiry, Vol. 17, No. 4 (Summer, 1991), pp. 773-797, JSTOR~ The project of making experience visible precludes analysis of the workings of this system and | 2/8/14 |
Case v Cal-MSUTournament: Fullerton | Round: 3 | Opponent: Michigan State Gannon-Hodgman | Judge: Quigley Simulating high magnitude scenarios in security policy are an exercise in problem-based learning—it’s a unique venue where we can make mistakes and develop strategies to cope with info overloadDonohue, 13 ~2013 Nation al Security Pedagogy: The Role of Simulations, Associate Professor of Law, Georgetown Law, http://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=217226context=facpub-http://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=217226context=facpub~~ Pragmatic action first—They destroy political changeOwen 2 David, Reader in Political Theory at the University of Southampton, Reorienting International Relations: On Pragmatism, Pluralism and Practical Reasoning", Millennium: Journal of International Studies, Vol. 31, No. 3, http://mil.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/31/3/653 Squo is structurally improving—War, health, environment and equalityLomborg 10/16 Bjorn, Adjunct Professor at the Copenhagen Business School, "A Better World Is Here", 2013, www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/on-the-declining-costs-of-global-problems-by-bj-rn-lomborg Fast, technical debate is good—the alternative is getting spread out by real-world fine print and replacing detailed knowledge with "accessible" sound-bitesLerner 2012 – poet, novelist, essayist, and critic, winner of the Hayden Carruth prize (October, Ben, Harpers, "Contest of Words: High school debate and the demise of public speech", http://harpers.org/archive/2012/10/contest-of-words/?single=126src=longreads26utm_source=buffer26buffer_share=b1dd3) I’m not interested here in attempting to present these various activities in their considerable internal Fast debate is beautiful—it pushes the limits of what language can do and teaches you to link values and policy—if you think affirming their style is important enough to vote on, then they have to answer thisLerner 2012 – poet, novelist, essayist, and critic, winner of the Hayden Carruth prize (October, Ben, Harpers, "Contest of Words: High school debate and the demise of public speech", http://harpers.org/archive/2012/10/contest-of-words/?single=126src=longreads26utm_source=buffer26buffer_share=b1dd3) If I have recognized the spread in drug warnings and financial doublespeak, where the The violence terrorists cause is systemic—-It occurs throughout the world through suicide bombings—-That creates a state of permanent violenceBeres and Messing 4 Postmodern theorists agree terrorism’s worse and makes ontological questions secondary—Threatens extinctionDerrida 3 - Jacques Derrida, Directeur d’Etudes at the Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales in Paris, and Professor of Philosophy, French and Comparative Literature at the University of California, Irvine, 2003, Philosophy in a Time of Terror, p. 98-99 Imperialism is good—It has literally averted every scenario for extinctionBarnett 11 Author of Great Powers: America and the World After Bush ’11 (Thomas, "The New Rules: Leadership Fatigue Puts U.S., and Globalization, at Crossroads," http://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/articles/8099/the-new-rules-leadership-fatigue-puts-u-s-and-globalization-at-crossroads-http://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/articles/8099/the-new-rules-leadership-fatigue-puts-u-s-and-globalization-at-crossroads, Mike) Imperialism is self-correcting, and solves slavery and human rightsWarraq 7 (Ibn, Founder of the Institute for the Secularisation of Islamic Study and senior research fellow at the Center for Inquiry, "Defending the West: A Critique of Edward Said’s Orientalism" pg. 75-76) | 2/17/14 |
Case v Harvard DTTournament: Fullerton | Round: 1 | Opponent: Harvard Taylor-Dimitrijevic | Judge: Bagwell Deterrence solves—-Empirics proveZakaria 12 – editor at large of Time Magazine Non-proliferation moves guarantees prolifWaltz 12 – Senior Research Scholar at the Saltzman Institute of War and Peace Studies and Adjunct Professor of Political Science at Columbia University (Kenneth N., Foreign Affairs. Why Iran Should get the Bomb Nuclear Balancing Would Mean Stability.http://sistemas.mre.gov.br/kitweb/datafiles/IRBr/pt-br/file/CAD/LXII20CAD/PolC3ADtica/Why20Iran20Should20Get20the20Bomb.pdf) Terrorists won’t acquire nukesWaltz 12 – Senior Research Scholar at the Saltzman Institute of War and Peace Studies and Adjunct Professor of Political Science at Columbia University (Kenneth N., Foreign Affairs. Why Iran Should get the Bomb Nuclear Balancing Would Mean Stability.http://sistemas.mre.gov.br/kitweb/datafiles/IRBr/pt-br/file/CAD/LXII20CAD/PolC3ADtica/Why20Iran20Should20Get20the20Bomb.pdf) Iran prolif key to solve Iran-Israel conflictWaltz 12 – Senior Research Scholar at the Saltzman Institute of War and Peace Studies and Adjunct Professor of Political Science at Columbia University (Kenneth N., Foreign Affairs. Why Iran Should get the Bomb Nuclear Balancing Would Mean Stability.http://sistemas.mre.gov.br/kitweb/datafiles/IRBr/pt-br/file/CAD/LXII20CAD/PolC3ADtica/Why20Iran20Should20Get20the20Bomb.pdf) Proliferation solves warDenney 13 (graduate at Yonsei University, Editor in Chief of Yonsei Journal of International Studies, citing Kenneth Waltz: American political scientist, faculty at University of California Berkeley and Columbia, prominent neorealist scholar in international relations, founder of structural realism, noted proliferation apologist (Steven, "His "Other" Legacy: Kenneth Waltz’s Defense of Nuclear Proliferation", 5/21/13; http://sinonk.com/2013/05/21/his-other-legacy-kenneth-waltzs-defense-of-nuclear-proliferation/-http://sinonk.com/2013/05/21/his-other-legacy-kenneth-waltzs-defense-of-nuclear-proliferation/) New arsenals aren’t destabilizing—-Small arsenals, no aggression, and deterrence solvesForsyth 12 ~James Wood Forsyth Jr., PhD, currently serves as professor of national security studies, USAF School of Advanced Air and Space Studies, Maxwell AFB, Alabama. He earned his PhD at the Josef Korbel School of International Studies, University of Denver. He has written on great-power war, intervention, and nuclear issues, "The Common Sense of Small Nuclear Arsenals," Summer, Strategic Studies Quarterly, http://www.au.af.mil/au/ssq/2012/summer/forsyth.pdf~~ Prolif causes bioweaponsZilinskas 00 Director, CBW Nonprolif Program, 2000 Bioweapons cause extinction—-Nukes don’tSinger 1 (Clifford E., professor of nuclear engineering and director of the Program in Arms Control, Disarmament and International Security at the University of Illinois at Urbana – Champaign, "Will mankind survive the millennium?" Bulletin of the program in Arms Control Disarmament, and International Security, 13:1, Swords and Ploughshares, http://acdis.illinois.edu/assets/docs/312/WillMankindSurvivetheMillennium.pdf) China Cant Renounce its NFUZhenqiang 5 Professor of International Relations at the Institute for Strategic Studies, 2005 Only U.S. nuclear deterrence solves Asian miscalcSuto and Tosaki 9 (Takaya and Hirofumi, Suto is a special assistant to The plan doesn’t change international perception or responsiveness—-Multiple examples proveStanley Foundation 8 ~4-4-08, "A new look at no first use" http://www.stanleyfoundation.org/publications/pdb/NoFirstUsePDB708.pdf~~ U.S. military might deters ChinaKumar 11 (Professor Economics at Azim Premji University, Vikas, "China’s Achilles Heels – Analysis," August 11, http://www.southasiaanalysis.org/5Cpapers475Cpaper4644.html-http://www.southasiaanalysis.org/5Cpapers475Cpaper4644.html, Mike) China NFU now—-Defensive sub posturingJohnson 9 ~Tim, McClatchy Newspapers, Jan 20, http://www.mcclatchydc.com/world/story/60172.html~~ China’s NFU isn’t perceivedArbatov 8 (Dr. Alexei, Strategic Studies Institute, "Non-First-Use As A Way of Outlawing Nuclear Weapons" November) First strike solvesLieber and Press 9 (Keir and Daryl, "The Rise of U.S. Nuclear Primacy," Keir A. Lieber, the author of War and the Engineers: The Primacy of Politics Over Technology, is Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Notre Dame. Daryl G. Press, the author of Calculating Credibility: How Leaders Assess Military Threats, is Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Pennsylvania., FOREIGN AFFAIRS, L/N, originally published in 2006) India NFU now—-No risk of Indo-Pak warIndia Times 9/27 ("India Ready to Negotiate Global No-First-Use Nuclear Treaty," http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2013-09-27/news/42463856_1_nuclear-weapons-no-first-use-world-order-http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2013-09-27/news/42463856_1_nuclear-weapons-no-first-use-world-order, Mike) No modeling—-Regional pressuresMilne 2 (Tom, "No First Use of Nuclear Weapons," Pugwash Meeting no. 279, November, http://www.pugwash.org/reports/nw/milne.htm-http://www.pugwash.org/reports/nw/milne.htm) Zero risk of Indo-Pak warButcher 10 (Bill, "India, Pakistan, the Bomb, and ’Limited War,’" June 25, http://subversify.com/2010/06/25/india-pakistan-the-bomb-and-limited-war/-http://subversify.com/2010/06/25/india-pakistan-the-bomb-and-limited-war/, Mike) Nuclear deterrence solvesMalik 3 (Mohan, The Stability Of Nuclear Deterrence In South Asia, Asian Affairs, Fall) | 2/11/14 |
Case v UMKCTournament: Shirley | Round: 6 | Opponent: Missouri - Kansas City Jones-Worrell | Judge: Munday Peacekeeping is key to heg – it’s the most effective force multiplier there isEnholm Executive Director of the Woodrow Wilson House and UN Expert ’11 (Robert, "U.S. Engagement in International Peacekeeping: From Aspiration to Implementation," http://globalsolutions.org/files/public/documents/U.S.-Engagement-in-International-Peacekeeping.pdf-http://globalsolutions.org/files/public/documents/U.S.-Engagement-in-International-Peacekeeping.pdf**, Mike) Heg solves dampens all global violence – it reduces security dilemmas by deterring challengers AND restraining allies from taking provocative actionsBrooks et al 13 Assessing the Security Benefits of Deep Engagement Even if deep engagement’s costs are far less Peacekeeping solves failed states – the impact spills over globallyEnholm Executive Director of the Woodrow Wilson House and UN Expert ’11 (Robert, "U.S. Engagement in International Peacekeeping: From Aspiration to Implementation," http://globalsolutions.org/files/public/documents/U.S.-Engagement-in-International-Peacekeeping.pdf-http://globalsolutions.org/files/public/documents/U.S.-Engagement-in-International-Peacekeeping.pdf**, Mike) Piracy causes extinction Pandemics cause extinctionEvans 10 (Jane Evans Department of Military Strategic Studies, writing for global security studies "Pandemics and National Security" http://globalsecuritystudies.com/Evans20PANDEMICS.pdf-http://globalsecuritystudies.com/Evans PANDEMICS.pdf, Donnie) The CP is key to UN Credibility and burden sharingFriends Committee on National Legislation ’2k ("The Future of UN Peacekeeping at a Crossroads: U.S. Leadership is Key," http://fcnl.org/resources/newsletter/may00/the_future_of_un_peacekeeping_at_a_crossroads_us_leadership_is_key/-http://fcnl.org/resources/newsletter/may00/the_future_of_un_peacekeeping_at_a_crossroads_us_leadership_is_key/**, Mike) Credible UN solves prolifWirth ’11 (Timothy – former senator from Colorado, served as the Undersecretary for Global Affairs in the Clinton Administration, president of the United Nations Foundation, The US-UN partnership: greater engagement will bring a greater institution, Harvard International Review, March 22, p. EBSCO Host) Prolif causes extinctionUtgoff 2 (Deputy Director of the Strategy Forces, and Resources Division of the Institute for Defense Analyses, Victor, "Proliferation, Missile Defence, and American Ambitions," Survival, Volume 44, Number 2, Summer) ET All forms of control are not equal – Liberalism solves the worst excessesHeins 5 (Volker, polisci Concordia University, 6 German Law Journal No. 5, May, http://www.germanlawjournal.com/article.php?id=598-http://www.germanlawjournal.com/article.php?id=598) According to this basic Principle of Distinction, modern humnitarian action is directed towards those The NEG’s focus on representations destroys social changeTaft-Kaufman 95 (Jill, professor, Department of Speech Communication And Dramatic Arts, at Central Michigan University, Southern Communication Journal, Spring, proquest) Alt cause—Drones are violating I-Law nowAlston 11 ~Philip, Pomeroy Professor of Law, New York University School of Law, was UN Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary, or arbitrary executions from 2004 until 2012, "The CIA and Targeted Killings Beyond Borders," 2 Harv. Nat’l Sec. J. 283, pg. lexis, ALB~ | 2/8/14 |
Case v USC DronesTournament: Csun | Round: 2 | Opponent: Southern California Overing-Panchal | Judge: Spring The civic engagement they create collapses hegemonyBoggs 2 – Their Author, Political Science Professor at USC, 2 (Carl, "Militarism and Terrorism: The Deadly Cycle," Democracy 26 Nature, Volume 8, Number 2) terrorism unfolds against a larger backdrop of the dialectic linking militarism and terrorism, this Heg solves EVERY impact—none of their old impact defense appliesKagan BAMF ’11 (Robert, "The Price of Power," Weekly Standard Vol. 16 No. 18, January 24, http://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/price-power_533696.html?page=3-http://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/price-power_533696.html?page=3, Mike) The civic engagement they create cripples hegemony and space weaponization Space weaponization solves all war forever and cements our hegemony Targ KillingExtinction outweighs – there can be no authentic acceptance of it The phenomenon of extinction is the technological ersatz for death. But our being- Nuclear war leads to extinction- preventing it is the primary responsibility of a judge. Every study of credible social theories concludes consequentialism is good—-Scientific studies of biology, evolution, and psychology prove that deontological proclivities are only illogical layovers from evolution Morality must take a backseat to the possibility of catastrophic consequencesTim Stelzig, Attorney Advisor in the Competition Policy Division of the FCC’s Wireline Competition Bureau, former associate with Arnold 26 Porter in Washington, D.C., JD from the University of Pennsylvania Law School, March 1998, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 146 U. Pa. L. Rev. 901, p. 959 Oversight of targeting killings causes a shift to signature strikes—Makes all their impacts inevitableOhlin 13 Jens David Ohlin 13, Professor at Cornell Law School, http://www.liebercode.org/2013/02/would-federal-district-court-for-drones.html | 11/9/13 |
Case v Weber AH BordersTournament: Shirley | Round: 4 | Opponent: Weber State Alvarado-Hendricks | Judge: Tews Borders are inevitable—The AFF does nothing to solveNewman, 2006 - Department of Politics and Government, Ben Gurion University, Beer Sheba, Israel (David, Progress in Human Geography, April, "The lines that continue to separate us: borders in our ’borderless’ world," vol. 30, no. 2, p. 143) No Solvency—Pragmatic action is key to understanding the otherNewman – of the University of the Negev – October 2004 (David, Progress in Human Geography, "Is There a Politics to Geopolitics?" vol. 28, no.5, p.634) No Internal link—Boundaries are not tied to colonization or state control—They are merely a means for re-identificationRadcliffe and Westwood – Radcliffe is a lecturer in Geography at the University of Cambridge, Westwood is a professor in sociology at the University of Leicester- 1996 (Sarah an Sallie, "Remaking the Nation" p. 129) Speaking for others is wrong—The AFF’s privileged social location makes any claim to political empowerment suspect—It’s an act of commodification and colonial domination, turning the caseLinda Martín Alcoff (Department of Philosophy at Syracuse University. "The Problem of Speaking For Others" Cultural Critique Winter 1991-92, pp. 5-32.) Speaking for others oppresses them—We must stop the impulse to speak to allow the organic intellectual to rise upLauren Marino (published author in the Malacester Journal of Philosophy, Volume 14, Issue 1, Spring 2005. "Speaking for Others") A retreat from the practice of speaking for others allows for receptive listening without sacrificing political effectivelyLinda Martín Alcoff (Department of Philosophy at Syracuse University. "The Problem of Speaking For Others" Cultural Critique Winter 1991-92, pp. 5-32.) | 2/8/14 |
Executive Order CP v USCTournament: Csun | Round: 2 | Opponent: Southern California Overing-Panchal | Judge: Spring The Executive branch of the United States federal government should create a cause of action for damages for those unlawfully injured by targeted killing operations ex-ante or their heirs that overrides the state secrets and official immunity doctrine and replaces them with carefully considered procedures for balancing the secrecy concerns.Internal checks are comparatively more effective than external restrictionsRadsan 2010 (Afsheen, Professor of Law, William Mitchell College of Law, BUSH AND OBAMA FIGHT TERRORISTS¶ OUTSIDE JUSTICE JACKSON’S TWILIGHT¶ ZONE, 26 Const. Comment. 551 2009-2010) | 11/9/13 |
Neoliberalism KTournament: Csun | Round: 5 | Opponent: Cal State Fullerton Rodriguez-Su | Judge: kovacs Their genealogical investigation is an example of post-structuralism that focuses on difference and location rather than emancipatory politics – this perpetuates the ideals of neoliberalismJoseph M. Schwartz, 8-9-13 (Professor of Political Science at Temple University. Schwartz’s teaching and published work focuses on the complex interaction among morality, ideology, and political and institutional development., "A Peculiar Blind Spot: Why did Radical Political Theory Ignore the Rampant Rise in Inequality Over the Past Thirty Years?", Volume 35, Issue 3, 2013, Special Issue: Studying Politics Today: Critical Approaches to Political Science) Social solidarity against neoliberalism is the only way to prevent social regressionJoseph M. Schwartz, 8-9-13 (Professor of Political Science at Temple University. Schwartz’s teaching and published work focuses on the complex interaction among morality, ideology, and political and institutional development., "A Peculiar Blind Spot: Why did Radical Political Theory Ignore the Rampant Rise in Inequality Over the Past Thirty Years?", Volume 35, Issue 3, 2013, Special Issue: Studying Politics Today: Critical Approaches to Political Science) Neoliberalism recreates racist and sexist politics turning the caseGiroux 5 (Henry, Global TV Network Chair in English and Cultural Studies at McMaster University, "The Terror of Neoliberalism", College Literature, 2005)PM The Alternative is solidarity against neoliberalism as a prior questionThe alt is necessary to secure difference while confronting racial, gender and economic dominationJoseph M. Schwartz, 8-9-13 (Professor of Political Science at Temple University. Schwartz’s teaching and published work focuses on the complex interaction among morality, ideology, and political and institutional development., "A Peculiar Blind Spot: Why did Radical Political Theory Ignore the Rampant Rise in Inequality Over the Past Thirty Years?", Volume 35, Issue 3, 2013, Special Issue: Studying Politics Today: Critical Approaches to Political Science) | 2/8/14 |
Nietzche 1NCTournament: Districts | Round: 3 | Opponent: Sacramento State Hampton-Bruce-Golsch | Judge: Peters God is dead and transcendental ethics died with it—-The morality of the 1AC is only a comforting illusion we have created in the place of gods rotting corpseNietzsche 1882 (Friedrich, Quals are Life-Negating, The Gay Science, Aph. 125, Nietzsche Channel) Exploitation is an inevitable condition of earth—-A desire for a world free of domination is a desire for a world that isn’t ours—-This is the foundation for the decay of lifeNietzsche 1886 (Friedrich, Chair of Classical Philology at the University of Basel, Beyond Good and Evil, The Nietzsche Channel, http://www.geocities.com/thenietzschechannel/bge.htm)
The AFF is a great escape—-The desire for a different world demands we clean up the stains of the one we live, culminating in a hatred for lifeTurnali 3 (Aydan, "nietzsche and the later wittgenstein", journal of nietzsche studies, issue 26, p. 61-2, muse) Suffering is an unavoidable condition of being human—-The idea we can control the world and eliminate suffering destroys all value to lifeKain 7 (Philip J, Professor of philosophy at University of Santa Clara, "Nietzsche, Eternal Recurrence, and the Horror of Existence," the Journal of Nietzsche Studies, muse) In the face of the horror of existence we ask you to vote Negative as a willful affirmation of suffering—-Only by submitting to it voluntarily are we able to retain our agency and happiness in lifeKain 7 (Philip J, Professor of philosophy at University of Santa Clara, "Nietzsche, Eternal Recurrence, and the Horror of Existence," the Journal of Nietzsche Studies, muse) | 2/22/14 |
Politics - CIRTournament: Csun | Round: 2 | Opponent: Southern California Overing-Panchal | Judge: Spring Congressional restrictions kill PC- Obama’s first term proves other objectives outweigh SOP questionsAckerman and Hathaway 11 (Bruce and Oona, Sterling Professor of Law and Political Science, Yale Law School; Gerard C. and Bernice Latrobe Smith Professor of International Law, Yale Law School; LIMITED WAR AND THE CONSTITUTION: IRAQ AND THE CRISIS OF PRESIDENTIAL LEGALITY, 109 Mich. L. Rev. 447, lexis) PC is key to immigration CIR is key to high-skill immigrationLA Times 11/9/2012 (Other countries eagerly await U.S. immigration reform, http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/world_now/2012/11/us-immigration-reform-eagerly-awaited-by-source-countries.html) That’s key to India’s economy- US trade ties and increased remittance flows build economic institutionsGupta and Hegde 2009 (Rupayan and S. Aaron, Assistant Professor of Economics at the Department of Economics, The Gabelli School of Business, Roger Williams University; Assistant Professor of Economics at the Department of Economics, California State University, Bakersfield, An Exploratory Study of Financial Remittances Among Non-Resident Indians in the United States, http://www.springerlink.com/content/npk346515g13127t/fulltext.html) Indian econ accesses multiple scenarios for extinction – nuclear winter with Pakistan, nuclear war with China, and Naxalite InsurgencyRobinson ’10 Over the last decade there has been an increasing focus on India’s economic and military | 11/9/13 |
Presidential Powers DATournament: UMKC | Round: 1 | Opponent: Texas DS | Judge: Corey Stone Presidential Powers DA 1NCObamas foreign policy presidential powers are high but he will show strategic restraint if they declineJoseph S. Nye Jr. is University Distinguished Service Professor at Harvard University and is the former Dean of the Kennedy School. 5-31-13 ("The Cult of Transformational Leadership", the diplomat) Regulating war making ability erodes presidential powersWorking Group Report on Detainee Interrogations in The Global War on Terrorism: Assessment of Legal, Historical, Policy, and Operational Considerations. Published in The Modern Tribune, Full Text Available at www.themoderntribune.com/full_text_us_torture_policy_memo_gonzalez_bush.htm~23Administration20Lawyers20Ascribed20Broad20Power20to20Bush20on20Torture Presidential leadership is key to arms reduction and preventing US-Russia-China warDaryl G. Kimball, 12-4-12 (Executive Director of the Arms Control Association , "Obama Underscores Need for Further Progress to Reduce Nuclear Dangers", Armscontrolnow.org) Biggest Magnitude- And, outweighs the case—There is no bigger impactNick Bostrom, Ph.D. and Professor of Philosophy at Oxford University, March 2002, Journal of Evolution and Technology, Existential Risks: Analyzing Human Extinction Scenarios and Related Hazards | 10/29/13 |
R SpecTournament: UNLV | Round: 4 | Opponent: Whitman College Lassiter-Thompson | Judge: Feldman Interpretation- the rez says "statutory and/or judicial restrictions"- that means the plan has to specify one or bothTennessee Department of Education, Programs of Study 2013-2014 Academic Year Violation- the plan just says "USFG should restrict"Reasons to vote-Ground- they destroy our ability to prepare either court or Congress based strategies, and eliminate agent counterplan ground that is LITERALLY built in to the resolution- if we read court DAs they would spike them in the 2AC by saying they’re Congress, or vice versaEducation- the point of this topic is to learn about legal implementation- they make that impossible by allowing ONLY the aff to make agent key arguments and taking away ANY possibility of comparison from the neg- only our vision of the topic gives effective legal education | 11/9/13 |
T - Armed ForcesTournament: Fullerton | Round: 1 | Opponent: Harvard Taylor-Dimitrijevic | Judge: Bagwell Interpretation- "Introducing United States Armed Forces into hostilities" refers to human members of the Armed Forces- we have the best reading of the War Powers Resolution, the only place where this phrase is defined and usedLorber 13 (Eric, J.D. Candidate, University of Pennsylvania Law School, Ph.D Candidate, Duke University Department of Political Science, EXECUTIVE WARMAKING AUTHORITY AND OFFENSIVE CYBER OPERATIONS: CAN EXISTING LEGISLATION SUCCESSFULLY CONSTRAIN PRESIDENTIAL POWER?, 15 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 961 2012-2013) Violation- they restrict something other than the introduction of members of the Armed ForcesReasons to vote-Limits- they allow the aff to restrict literally anything controlled by the military- leads to nuke affs, space weapon affs, experimental weapon affs- the list goes on- they force the neg to defend the use of literally every military-ish device in existence which is an impossible burdenPrecision- in the context of war powers the whole phrase "introduction of United States Armed Forces into hostilities" refers to activities covered by the War Powers Resolution- our evidence gives the best legal analysis of what that means- that’s the most predictable basis on which to define the topic | 2/11/14 |
T - RestricictionsTournament: UNLV | Round: 4 | Opponent: Whitman College Lassiter-Thompson | Judge: Feldman Interpretation- Restrictions can’t MODIFY- can ONLY legally hinderSearcy v. Searcy 2002 (Monte W. Searcy, Appellant v. Susan C. Searcy, Respondent. Case Number: WD60604 Handdown Date: 09/24/2002 Appeal From: Circuit Court of Buchanan County, Hon. Randall R. Jackson. Missouri Court of Appeals Western District – http://caselaw.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=mo26vol=/appeals/092002/26invol=9092402_2002.) Violation – the affirmative just modifies legislation and authorizes direct support of authorized United States military operations.Limits – impossible amount of ways we can change legislationBidirectional – Makes it impossible to figure out if they restrict war powersExtra-topical – they have two planks that authorize force that aren’t currently authorized – extra topicality is a voting issue for predictable ground and fairnessTopicality is a voter for fairness and education | 11/9/13 |
T - RestrictionTournament: Csun | Round: 2 | Opponent: Southern California Overing-Panchal | Judge: Spring Interpretation- "Restrictions" must legally limit an activity under the President’s authority- the President must no longer have authority to carry it outDOE ’95 (Personnel Security Administrative Review Cases – DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS Hearing Officer’s Opinion Case Name: Personnel Security Hearing Date of Filing:December 5, 1995 – http://www.oha.doe.gov/cases/security/vso0075.htm) Reasons to vote-Ground- all of our generic links are premised on the aff taking away presidential authority to do things or legally limiting their activities- they take away any deference good or targeted killing good ground- the neg is left with virtually nothingPredictability- there are an INFINITE number of agencies or other governments they can report to and NO REASON that informing specific people of the aff’s choice is bad- they get advantages based SOLELY on the reporting with NO additional neg groundTwo violations- the aff is ONLY a reporting requirement, and they only require the disclosure of legal justifications for "targeted killings," not of the individual killings themselves | 11/9/13 |
T - Targeted KillingTournament: UNLV | Round: 4 | Opponent: Whitman College Lassiter-Thompson | Judge: Feldman "Targeted killing" means extra-judicial, premeditated killing of a specific individual not in government custodyRadsan and Murphy 2010 (Afsheen and Richard, Professor of Law, William Mitchell College of Law; AT26T Professor of Law, Texas Tech University School of Law, DUE PROCESS AND TARGETED KILLING OF¶ TERRORISTS, 31 Cardozo L. Rev. 405 2009-2010) B. Violation – "Signature Strikes" are not targeted killing – they affect wide un-identified groups of individualsAnderson ’11(Kenneth, law professor at Washington College of Law, American University and member of the Hoover Task Force on National Security and Law, August 29, "Distinguishing High Value Targeted Killing and "Signature" Attacks on Taliban Fighters", http://opiniojuris.org/2011/08/29/distinguishing-high-value-targeted-killing-and-signature-attacks-on-taliban-fighters/) C. Prefer our interpretation1. Precision – they conflate targeted killing and drone strikes – explodes the research base and aff ground2. Limits - They expand the topic to include anything the U.S. does with drones or any form of killing – This devastates limitsD. Voter for fairness, education – prefer competing interpretations – offense defense paradigm is key to create a race to the middle that preserves the topic | 11/9/13 |
T v SacStateTournament: Districts | Round: 3 | Opponent: Sacramento State Hampton-Bruce-Golsch | Judge: Peters "Statutory restrictions on authority" require the CongressPeterson 91 , Associate Professor of Law @ George Washington University, Judicial is the courtsMacMillan Dictionary No Date Violation—-The plan claims to limit the president’s war power authority by refusing to answer the resolution – that’s not a statutory or judicial restrictionVote negative—-They claim to win the debate for reasons other than the desirability of topical action. That undermines preparation and clash—-Changing the question now leaves one side unprepared, resulting in shallow, uneducational debate—-Requiring debate on a communal topic forces argument development and develops persuasive skills critical to any political outcomeIndependently—-Debaters should post their arguments——Round Reports require a description of your arguments, and answers to arguments in the debate—-That’s key to education and argument quality | 2/22/14 |
T-Armed Forces v UMKCTournament: Shirley | Round: 6 | Opponent: Missouri - Kansas City Jones-Worrell | Judge: Munday A. Interpretation- "Introducing United States Armed Forces into hostilities" refers to human members of the Armed Forces- we have the best reading of the War Powers Resolution, the only place where this phrase is defined and usedLorber 2013 (Eric, J.D. Candidate, University of Pennsylvania Law School, Ph.D Candidate, Duke University Department of Political Science, EXECUTIVE WARMAKING AUTHORITY AND OFFENSIVE CYBER OPERATIONS: CAN EXISTING LEGISLATION SUCCESSFULLY CONSTRAIN PRESIDENTIAL POWER?, 15 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 961 2012-2013) B. Violations:1. They restrict something other than the introduction USAF into "Hostilities", Hostilities means members of the Armed Forces would be actively engaging in combat with other peopleLorber 2013 (Eric, J.D. Candidate, University of Pennsylvania Law School, Ph.D Candidate, Duke University Department of Political Science, EXECUTIVE WARMAKING AUTHORITY AND OFFENSIVE CYBER OPERATIONS: CAN EXISTING LEGISLATION SUCCESSFULLY CONSTRAIN PRESIDENTIAL POWER?, 15 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 961 2012-2013) 2. They affect powers short of war not war powers- the aff can’t restrict the president’s ability to move forces around, deploy force where invited, do peacekeeping or rescue missions, or make hostile deployments that could provoke a warRamsey 2002 (Michael, Professor of Law, University of San Diego Law School, Textualism and War Powers, The University of Chicago Law Review69.4 (Fall 2002): 1543-1638, proquest) C. Standards:Predictable Limits—they allow the aff to restrict literally anything controlled by the military and force the neg to defend the use of literally every military-ish device in existence which is an impossible burden. Requires research into a whole separate literature base —- undermines preparedness for all debates.Precision- in the context of war powers the whole phrase "introduction of United States Armed Forces into hostilities" refers to activities covered by the War Powers Resolution- our evidence gives the best legal analysis of what that means- that’s the most predictable basis on which to define the topicExtra-topical—the way their plan text is written gives them inflated solvency claims. They restrict power for every peacekeeping operation that’s outside of war powers. This includes giving supplies to the UN. Reject the team otherwise we’d have to win T every debate just to get back to square one.Topicality is a voter for fairness and education. Evaluate under competing interpretations—reasonability is arbitrary. | 2/8/14 |
T-AuthorityTournament: UMKC | Round: 1 | Opponent: Texas DS | Judge: Corey Stone T-Authority 1NCInterpretation- "war powers authority of the President" refers to authority given to the President by Congress- this means there has to be an explicit authorization for the thing they restrictBejesky 2012 (Robert, M.A. Political Science (Michigan), M Centuries of legal practice support our interpretationDycus 2010 (Stephen, Professor, Vermont Law School, Congress’s Role in Cyber Warfare, JOURNAL OF NATIONAL SECURITY LAW 26 POLICY Vol. 4:155, http://jnslp.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/11_Dycus.pdf) Violation- they restrict an activity not authorized by CongressReasons to vote-Limits- There are literally an infinite number of theoretical detentions to make or places to introduce armed forces- our interpretation forces them to revoke things that actually happen- only way to place a predictable limit on the object of the aff’s restrictionBidirectionality- they move the topic toward theoretical Presidential ASSERTIONS of authority rather than ACTUAL authority- allows the aff to do things like "restrict" to the actual authority to prevent legal challenges to itGround- they fundamentally change the nature of the lit base- they let the aff use Presidentialists like John Yoo to say basically whatever they want- we force the topic to be about the AUMF and a few other pieces of legislation- gives a more cohesive, legal focus to the topic and ensures the neg can defend all of the tactics the aff can ban | 10/29/13 |
Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
---|---|---|---|
10/29/13 | nathanieleli@gmailcom | ||
10/29/13 | nathanieleli@gmailcom | ||
10/29/13 | nathanieleli@gmailcom |
Air Force
Amherst
Appalachian State
Arizona State
Army
Augustana
Bard
Baylor
Binghamton
Boston College
Capital
CSU Long Beach
CSU Northridge
CSU Sacramento
CUNY
Cal Berkeley
Cal Lutheran
Cal Poly SLO
Case Western
Central Florida
Central Oklahoma
Chico
Clarion
Columbia
Concordia
Cornell
Dartmouth
Denver
Drexel-Swarthmore
ENMU
East Los Angeles College
Eastern Washington
Emory
Emporia
Fayetteville State
Florida
Florida Int'l
Florida State
Fordham
Fresno State
Fullerton
Gainesville State
George Mason
George Washington
Georgetown
Georgia
Georgia State
Georgia Tech
Gonzaga
Harvard
Houston
Idaho State
Illinois
Illinois State
Indiana
Iowa
Irvine/SFSU
James Madison
John Carroll
Johns Hopkins
Johnson County CC
KCKCC
Kansas
Kansas State
Kentucky
LA City College
Lakeland
Lewis-Clark State College
Liberty
Lindenwood
Los Rios
Louisville
Loyola
Macalester
Marist
Mary Washington
Mercer
Methodist
Miami FL
Miami OH
Michigan
Michigan State
Minnesota
Mission
Missouri State
NYU
Navy
New School
North Texas
Northern Iowa
Northwestern
Notre Dame
Ohio Wesleyan
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pepperdine
Piedmont
Pittsburgh
Portland State
Princeton
Puget Sound
Redlands
Richmond
Rochester
Rutgers
Samford
San Diego State
San Francisco State
Santa Clara
South Florida St Pete
Southern Methodist
Southwestern
Stanford
Texas State
Texas-Austin
Texas-Dallas
Texas-San Antonio
Texas-Tyler
Towson
Trinity
U Chicago
UCLA
UDC-CC
UMKC
UNLV
USC
Utah
Vanderbilt
Vermont
Virginia Tech
Wake Forest
Wash U (St. Louis)
Washburn
Washington
Wayne State
Weber
West Georgia
West Virginia
Western Connecticut
Whitman
Wichita State
Wisconsin Oshkosh
Wyoming