Tournament: NJDDT | Round: 4 | Opponent: KCKCC | Judge: Collins, Dave
Uniqueness – The Court’s 2008 ruling on Boumediene preserved judicial legitimacy in regards to indefinite detention.
Devins, Goodrich Professor of Law and Professor of Government, College of William and Mary, ‘10
Neal, “Talk Loudly and Carry a Small Stick: The Supreme Court and Enemy Combatants”, Journal of Constitutional Law, Vol. 12, No. 2, February 2010, RSR
Throughout the course of its enemy combatant decision making, the Court has moved incrementally
AND
its muscles without meaningfully undermining the policy preferences of the President and Congress.
Link – A court ruling on Boumediene to constrain the executive would spark backlash.
Devins, Goodrich Professor of Law and Professor of Government, College of William and Mary, ‘10
Neal, “Talk Loudly and Carry a Small Stick: The Supreme Court and Enemy Combatants”, Journal of Constitutional Law, Vol. 12, No. 2, February 2010, RSR
For much the same reason, the Court understood that its decision posed few national
AND
political branches to respect the centrality of habeas corpus limits on governmental power.
Impacts
a) Turns solvency - presidential backlash to judicial decisions kills the court’s power and leads to non-compliance.
Benson, J.D., University of California, Berkeley, School of Law, ‘9
Josh, “The Guantanamo Game: A Public Choice Perspective on Judicial Review in Wartime”, California Law Review, Vol. 97, RSR
First, Howell notes that the judiciary can issue decisions, but it cannot enforce
AND
move policy-again, subject to the limitations noted in this Comment.
b) Judicial decisions constraining the executive’s use of armed forces would massively drain judicial capital. This results in backlash, open defiance, and unchecked executive discretion.
Druck, J.D. Candidate Cornell Law School, ‘12
Judah, “DRONING ON: THE WAR POWERS RESOLUTION¶ AND THE NUMBING EFFECT OF¶ TECHNOLOGY-DRIVEN WARFARE”, Cornell Law Review, Vol. 98, 2012, RSR
The suits arising out of possible WPR violations are well-documented53 and therefore only
AND
they are, in some respect, the lesser of two evils. B
Unchecked executive discretion results in miscalculation and war.
Adler ’11 David, Director of the Andrus Center for Public Policy at Boise State University, where he holds an appointment as the Cecil Andrus Professor of Public Affairs; “Presidential Ascendancy in Foreign Affairs and the Subversion of the Constitution”, Presented to the German-American Conference on “Comparisons of Parliamentary and Coordinated Power (Presidential) Systems, March 4-8, 2011, Bloomington, Indiana; http://www.civiced.org/pdfs/GermanAmericanConf2011/Adler.pdf)
A considerable literature urges executive supremacy, and extols the supposed virtues of presidential assertion
AND
policy concerns are even more compelling today than they were two centuries ago.