Tournament: Kentucky | Round: 2 | Opponent: Minnesota Sadagopal-Tauring-Traxler | Judge: Casey

Heads up, this arguments has narratives from different people within the community. We will not be posting those for obvious reasons. Let us know if you have any questions about them.

The sex that is not one is papered over by the collective forgetting of sexual difference – men and women are forced into subjugating themselves to the phallocentric order as part of their everyday existence

Deutscher 2 - professor in French philosophy and gender at Northwestern
(Penelope, A Politics of Impossible difference)

Irigaray goes on to explain that
AND
or do as women" (166).

The logic of phallocentrism structures the debate community- women are forced into the androcentric economy of sameness in order to earn a place in the collegiate debate and the failure to conform drives the exclusion of women from the activity.  The reproduction of the masculine subject position spillsover into your life after debate and supports it’s entrenchment across society

Griffin and Raider, 89
(J. Cinder and Holly Jane, “Women in High School Debate”http:groups.wfu.edu/debate/MiscSites/DRGArticles/GriffinandRaider1989PunishmentPar.htm)

'I don't usually vote for girl
AND
she overcomes the initial obstacles.

Argument choice in debates are also reflective of the phallocentric economy of the same- the denial of personal experience and connections to individuals are indicative of the androcentric logic that denies the feminine

Eisenberg in 2012
Particular types of argument
AND
to a moment of reflexivity.  

Collegiate policy debate is a microcosm of the treatment of the feminine in the public sphere-  To speak is never neutral and discourse in the public sphere is marked by the collective forgetting of the original starting point of social relations which is the subjugation of the feminine

Irigaray 2k4
(Luce, femme fatale An ethics of sexual difference pg. 10-11)
In order to distance oneself,
AND
which he diminishes or destroys.

Vote neg to inhabit the silence of the 1ac to invigorate a politics of sexual difference whose ontological openness disrupts the phallocentrism of debate and presidential war powers

Deutscher, professor in French philosophy and gender at Northwestern, 2K2
(Penelope, A Politics of Impossible difference pg. 29-30)

When Irigaray concludes that
AND
very emblem of phallocentrism.

Phallocentrism is a better explanation of hegemonic conflict – only the alternative can create peace

Sjoberg ‘10 Laura, assistant professor of political science at the University of Florida, Ph.D. from the University of Southern California School of International Relations in 2004, and J.D. from Boston College in 2007, “Gendering Power Transition Theory”, page number below, CMR

International system patriarchy
AND
 to create peace between them. end page 94

The AFF’s hegemony impacts lead to the perpetuation of hyper masculinity, construction of threats, and devaluation of the feminine

  
Naomi Atkins, University of Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia, “INTERNATIONAL AS PERSONAL: DISCURSIVE NARRATIVES OF HEGEMONIC MASCULINITY IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS”, September 2011, http://law.anu.edu.au/coast/events/apsa/papers/164.pdf, CMR
Hegemonic Masculinity 

Combining feminist theory to international
ABD
the discursive narratives of US empire building.