General Actions:
Wiki: opencaselist13
▼:
Document Index
»
Space: Pittsburgh
▼:
Document Index
»
Page: Woodford-Markus Aff
Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Video | Edit/Delete |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Motorcityclassic | 3 | John Carroll Massarelli-Stolfer | Henry |
| ||||
UMKC | 1 | Dunno |
|
Tournament | Round | Report |
---|
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Entry | Date |
---|---|
1ACTournament: UMKC | Round: 1 | Opponent: Dunno | Judge: “On September 11th, 2001…” Shaub 2011. Shaub, Jonathan D. "A Foucauldian Call for the Archaeological Excavation of Discourses in the Post-Boumediene Habeas Litigation." Northwestern University Law Review 105.2 (2011): 869-918. Web. 23 Aug. 2013. “On September 11, 2001 . . . ”When a sentence or a AND as well as to reengage with the difficult issues of past wartime precedents. September 11th intensified the power of the nation state. Nealon 2008. Nealon, Jeffery T. Foucault Beyond Foucault: Power and Its Intensifications since 1984. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 2008. Print. However, among my most overarching arguments will be that we have too hastily abandoned AND relations to his late work on the ethics and aesthetics of resistant subjectivity. Bio-Politics Post 9-11 discourse constrains our speech. Shaub 2011. Shaub, Jonathan D. "A Foucauldian Call for the Archaeological Excavation of Discourses in the Post-Boumediene Habeas Litigation." Northwestern University Law Review 105.2 (2011): 869-918. Web. 23 Aug. 2013. This Note explores the impact that this discourse has had within the Judicial Branch. AND error of this proposition and the necessity for the judicial excavation of discourse. This discourse intensifies sovereign power by normalizing the legitimacy of executive practices. Shaub 2011. Shaub, Jonathan D. "A Foucauldian Call for the Archaeological Excavation of Discourses in the Post-Boumediene Habeas Litigation." Northwestern University Law Review 105.2 (2011): 869-918. Web. 23 Aug. 2013 Informed by Foucault’s methodology, this Note argues that Judge Leon and many other members AND by Foucault, and this Note calls for the same solution: archaeology.
This normalization paves the way for justifying an unending war against an ill-defined enemy. Shaub 2011. Shaub, Jonathan D. "A Foucauldian Call for the Archaeological Excavation of Discourses in the Post-Boumediene Habeas Litigation." Northwestern University Law Review 105.2 (2011): 869-918. Web. 23 Aug. 2013. Nine days after the attacks of 9/11, President Bush addressed Congress, AND 67 thus neatly connecting it all to the origin of 9/11. Unending war entails the intensification of certain practices of power by expanding the types and scale of punishment practices and the folding in of new bodies and subjects into America’s regime of power. Dal Lago and Palidda 2010. Dal Lago, Alessandro, and Salvatore Palidda, eds. Conflict, Security and the Reshaping of Society. London And New York: Routledge, 2010. Print. After the attacks of 11 September 2001 in New York, 11 March 2004 in AND in the West, as well as different types of social outcasts).9 This intensification of war can be seen as an escalation of US sovereign power through the expansion of war powers to new targets, institutionalizing new forms of militarized social control. Dal Lago and Palidda 2010 #2. Dal Lago, Alessandro, and Salvatore Palidda, eds. Conflict, Security and the Reshaping of Society. London And New York: Routledge, 2010. Print. The most decisive change that is probably able to produce unpredictable effects can be summarized AND is not alternative, but rather entirely complementary to peaceful systems of government. Institutionalized militaristic control of society drives us towards a permanent micro-fascism which places us in a permanent state of exception. Dal Lago and Palidda 2010 #3. Dal Lago, Alessandro, and Salvatore Palidda, eds. Conflict, Security and the Reshaping of Society. London And New York: Routledge, 2010. Print. The new wars always have political and social goals, but these are neither national AND of the rich and the poverty of the poor to a boiling point. This state of exception justifies legal civil war, i.e. the elimination of anyone (citizen or non-citizen) who can’t be folded neatly into the social order. This drive towards totalitarianism is and the final stage in the state achieving complete and perfect bio-political control. Agamben 2003. Giorgio Agamben. The State of Exception - Der Ausnahmezustand. Lecture at European Graduate School. August 2003. Transcription by: Anton Pulvirenti So among the adjuncts which make difficult the definition of the state of exception there AND Nazi Lager. They had lost not only citizenship but any juridical identity. Biopolitics dooms us to indistinction that allows fascism, ethnic cleansing, genocide, and the horrors of the concentration camp to be made real. Agamben 1998 Giorgio: Professor of Philosophy and Aesthetics at the University of Verona Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Translated by Daniel Heller-Roazen. P. 120-123. 1.2 Karl Lowith was the first to define the fundamental character of totalitarian AND rebirth of new forms of fascism in Europe also have their roots here. Along with the emergence of biopolitics, we can observe a displacement and gradual expansion AND modernity, whose metamorphoses and disguises we will have to learn to recognize.
Bio-politics is reified through our speech acts. The moment we draw a distinction between acceptable and unacceptable subjects as objects of power relations, we performatively intensify the exercise of bio-political power in the state of exception. Gregory 06 Derek: PhD, Peter Wall Distinguished Professor, and Professor of Geography at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver. “The Black Flag: Guantánamo Bay and the Space of Exception” Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography, Vol. 88, No. 4 (2006), pp. 405-427. Wiley. First, Agamben argues that homo sacer emerges¶ at the point where sovereign power AND cartography of power is capable of folding¶ such propriety in to such perversity
Framework John Yoo, a legal scholar, published an article justifying the expansion of executive authority in 1996. Five years later, George W. Bush hired him as his administration’s chief legal advisor. Yoo’s theories became the underpinnings of Bush’s interpretation of presidential authority. Our scholarship and speech produced in this round matter. Alexander 2012. Alexander, Janet C. "John Yoo’s War Powers: The Law Review and the World." California Law Review 100.331 (2012): 332-64. Print. John Yoo’s 1996 The Continuation of Politics by Other Means: The Original Understanding of AND the participation of legal academics in government and the formation of national policy. As debaters and scholars, our perceived expertise on this topic leads others to treat our opinions, research, and work as authoritative. Our speech has a constitutive role in the policy formulation and decision making process. Alexander 2012. Alexander, Janet C. "John Yoo’s War Powers: The Law Review and the World." California Law Review 100.331 (2012): 332-64. Print. Surely one of the most consequential articles ever published in the California Law Review ( AND for many of the most extreme and controversial policies of the Bush administration.
Our discourse is like the walking-catfish. It migrates into politics, it doesn’t just stay in the pond of academia, and once there, it wrecks things all to hell. Alexander 2012. Alexander, Janet C. "John Yoo’s War Powers: The Law Review and the World." California Law Review 100.331 (2012): 332-64. Print. Even assuming that the criticisms of Yoo’s historical analysis are correct, law reviews publish AND War on Terrorism” would at least have been substantially less enthusiastically pursued. Solvency We can challenge power from within the effects of its relations, it can’t operate on us without our consent. Nealon 2008. Nealon, Jeffery T. Foucault Beyond Foucault: Power and Its Intensifications since 1984. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 2008. Print As Foucault suggests, the scholarly consensus surrounding social constructionism too often leads to " AND gone are the days when you're out of town or out of reach. Change happens from within, through a mutation in the forces at work in the system. In a discursive formation, this means our way of speaking must change. Nealon 2008. Nealon, Jeffery T. Foucault Beyond Foucault: Power and Its Intensifications since 1984. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 2008. Print Historical change thematized under the rubric of intensity is spurred, developed, or AND becomes a poem, or when a verbal dispute becomes a physical confrontation. | 9/14/13 |
Updated 1ACTournament: Motorcityclassic | Round: 3 | Opponent: John Carroll Massarelli-Stolfer | Judge: Henry 1AC"On September 11th, 2001…"Shaub 2011. Shaub, Jonathan D. "A Foucauldian Call for the Archaeological Excavation of Discourses in the Post-Boumediene Habeas Litigation." Northwestern University Law Review 105.2 (2011): 869-918. Web. 23 Aug. 2013. September 11th intensified the power of the nation state.Nealon 2008. Nealon, Jeffery T. Foucault Beyond Foucault: Power and Its Intensifications since 1984. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 2008. Print. State of ExceptionPost 9-11 discourse constrains our speech.Shaub 2011. Shaub, Jonathan D. "A Foucauldian Call for the Archaeological Excavation of Discourses in the Post-Boumediene Habeas Litigation." Northwestern University Law Review 105.2 (2011): 869-918. Web. 23 Aug. 2013. This discourse intensifies sovereign power by normalizing the legitimacy of executive practices.Shaub 2011. Shaub, Jonathan D. "A Foucauldian Call for the Archaeological Excavation of Discourses in the Post-Boumediene Habeas Litigation." Northwestern University Law Review 105.2 (2011): 869-918. Web. 23 Aug. 2013 This normalization paves the way for justifying an unending war against an ill-defined enemy.Shaub 2011. Shaub, Jonathan D. "A Foucauldian Call for the Archaeological Excavation of Discourses in the Post-Boumediene Habeas Litigation." Northwestern University Law Review 105.2 (2011): 869-918. Web. 23 Aug. 2013. Unending war entails the intensification of certain practices of power by expanding the types and scale of punishment practices and the folding in of new bodies and subjects into America’s regime of power.Dal Lago and Palidda 2010. Dal Lago, Alessandro, and Salvatore Palidda, eds. Conflict, Security and the Reshaping of Society. London And New York: Routledge, 2010. Print. This intensification of war can be seen as an escalation of US sovereign power through the expansion of war powers to new targets, institutionalizing new forms of militarized social control.Dal Lago and Palidda 2010 ~232. Dal Lago, Alessandro, and Salvatore Palidda, eds. Conflict, Security and the Reshaping of Society. London And New York: Routledge, 2010. Print. Institutionalized militaristic control of society drives us towards a permanent micro-fascism which places us in a permanent state of exception.Dal Lago and Palidda 2010 ~233. Dal Lago, Alessandro, and Salvatore Palidda, eds. Conflict, Security and the Reshaping of Society. London And New York: Routledge, 2010. Print. This state of exception justifies legal civil war, i.e. the elimination of anyone (citizen or non-citizen) who can’t be folded neatly into the social order. This drive towards totalitarianism is and the final stage in the state achieving complete and perfect bio-political control.Agamben 2003. Giorgio Agamben. The State of Exception - Der Ausnahmezustand. Lecture at European Graduate School. August 2003. Transcription by: Anton Pulvirenti Our acceptance of the tropes of politics ensures the circulation of status quo symbols and tropes, ceding political authority to the executive. All impacts inevitable in the status quo . *Edited for genderEdelman 64 (Murray –Ph.D. in Poli Sci from University of Illinois The Symbolic Uses of Politics pp. 186-187) FrameworkJohn Yoo, a legal scholar, published an article justifying the expansion of executive authority in 1996. Five years later, George W. Bush hired him as his administration’s chief legal advisor. Yoo’s theories became the underpinnings of Bush’s interpretation of presidential authority. Our scholarship and speech produced in this round matter.Alexander 2012. Alexander, Janet C. "John Yoo’s War Powers: The Law Review and the World." California Law Review 100.331 (2012): 332-64. Print. As debaters and scholars, our perceived expertise on this topic leads others to treat our opinions, research, and work as authoritative. Our speech has a constitutive role in the policy formulation and decision making process.Alexander 2012. Alexander, Janet C. "John Yoo’s War Powers: The Law Review and the World." California Law Review 100.331 (2012): 332-64. Print. Our discourse is like the walking-catfish. It migrates into politics, it doesn’t just stay in the pond of academia, and once there, it wrecks things all to hell.Alexander 2012. Alexander, Janet C. "John Yoo’s War Powers: The Law Review and the World." California Law Review 100.331 (2012): 332-64. Print. SolvencyThe first step in breaking the system is the deconstruction of the assumption that no alternative to the status quo exists.Bacevich 10 (Andrew – PhD in American Diplomatic History from Princeton University. Chair of International Relations; Professor of International Relations and History at Boston University "Washington Rules: America’s Path to Permanent War" pg. 229-230) We can challenge power from within the effects of its relations, it can’t operate on us without our consent.Nealon 2008. Nealon, Jeffery T. Foucault Beyond Foucault: Power and Its Intensifications since 1984. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 2008. Print Change happens from within, through a mutation in the forces at work in the system. In a discursive formation, this means our way of speaking must change.Nealon 2008. Nealon, Jeffery T. Foucault Beyond Foucault: Power and Its Intensifications since 1984. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 2008. Print Statement of PurposeOur 1AC performs a genealogical examination of the discursive formations which justify the intensification of the executive’s practices of sovereign power. This examination rejects the constitutive role we, as debaters and topic experts, play in legitimizing those practices. Rejection is key to reverse our drive towards a permanent state of exception and legal civil war. | 9/28/13 |
Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
---|
Air Force
Amherst
Appalachian State
Arizona State
Army
Augustana
Bard
Baylor
Binghamton
Boston College
Capital
CSU Long Beach
CSU Northridge
CSU Sacramento
CUNY
Cal Berkeley
Cal Lutheran
Cal Poly SLO
Case Western
Central Florida
Central Oklahoma
Chico
Clarion
Columbia
Concordia
Cornell
Dartmouth
Denver
Drexel-Swarthmore
ENMU
East Los Angeles College
Eastern Washington
Emory
Emporia
Fayetteville State
Florida
Florida Int'l
Florida State
Fordham
Fresno State
Fullerton
Gainesville State
George Mason
George Washington
Georgetown
Georgia
Georgia State
Georgia Tech
Gonzaga
Harvard
Houston
Idaho State
Illinois
Illinois State
Indiana
Iowa
Irvine/SFSU
James Madison
John Carroll
Johns Hopkins
Johnson County CC
KCKCC
Kansas
Kansas State
Kentucky
LA City College
Lakeland
Lewis-Clark State College
Liberty
Lindenwood
Los Rios
Louisville
Loyola
Macalester
Marist
Mary Washington
Mercer
Methodist
Miami FL
Miami OH
Michigan
Michigan State
Minnesota
Mission
Missouri State
NYU
Navy
New School
North Texas
Northern Iowa
Northwestern
Notre Dame
Ohio Wesleyan
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pepperdine
Piedmont
Pittsburgh
Portland State
Princeton
Puget Sound
Redlands
Richmond
Rochester
Rutgers
Samford
San Diego State
San Francisco State
Santa Clara
South Florida St Pete
Southern Methodist
Southwestern
Stanford
Texas State
Texas-Austin
Texas-Dallas
Texas-San Antonio
Texas-Tyler
Towson
Trinity
U Chicago
UCLA
UDC-CC
UMKC
UNLV
USC
Utah
Vanderbilt
Vermont
Virginia Tech
Wake Forest
Wash U (St. Louis)
Washburn
Washington
Wayne State
Weber
West Georgia
West Virginia
Western Connecticut
Whitman
Wichita State
Wisconsin Oshkosh
Wyoming