General Actions:
Wiki: opencaselist13
▼:
Document Index
»
Space: Oklahoma
▼:
Document Index
»
Page: Leonardi-Masterson Neg
Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Video | Edit/Delete |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Harvard | 2 | Georgetown EM |
| |||||
Harvard | 8 | Towson HW |
| |||||
Harvard | 8 | Towson HW |
| |||||
Kentucky | 1 | USC PV |
| |||||
Kentucky | 2 | Southern California Purk-Vitzileos | Russell |
| ||||
Kentucky | 9 | Towson Johnson-Ruffin | Casey, Kennedy, Schultz, Turner, Van Luvanee |
| ||||
Kentucky RR | 1 | Marywashington |
| |||||
Kentucky RR | 3 | Harvard BS |
| |||||
Kentucky RR | 5 | Wake |
| |||||
Kentucky RR | 8 | MSU |
| |||||
NDT | 2 | Emory Dean-Klarman | Donlan, Eyzaguirre, Manuel |
| ||||
NDT | 8 | Harvard DT | Johnson, Shook, Spring |
| ||||
Ndt | 4 | Kansas State Klucas-Mays | Fifelski, Haynal, Vega |
| ||||
Ndt | 4 | Kansas State Klucas-Mays | Fifelski, Haynal, Vega |
| ||||
Ndt | 5 | West Georgia Ard-Muhammad | Allsup, KOSLOW, loghry |
| ||||
PItt RR | 4 | Kansas BC | Short |
| ||||
Pitt RR | 2 | Texas-Austin FM | Kyle Deming |
| ||||
Shirley | 4 | West Georgia Ard-Muhammad | Hagwood |
| ||||
USC | 6 | Vermont Brough-Broughton | Kelsie |
| ||||
tournament | 3 | Kansas Khatri-Schile | loghry |
| ||||
tournament | 8 | UT San Antonio Morales-Pleitez | Albiniak |
|
Tournament | Round | Report |
---|---|---|
Harvard | 2 | Opponent: Georgetown EM | Judge: 1NC T Substantially increase statutory Will K |
Harvard | 8 | Opponent: Towson HW | Judge: Spectrality K (only argument all speaches) |
Harvard | 8 | Opponent: Towson HW | Judge: Spectrality K (only argument all speaches) |
Kentucky | 1 | Opponent: USC PV | Judge: 1AC - cause of action public deliberation 1NC Block 2NC |
Kentucky | 2 | Opponent: Southern California Purk-Vitzileos | Judge: Russell 1AC cause of action heg aff 1NC Block 2NR |
Kentucky | 9 | Opponent: Towson Johnson-Ruffin | Judge: Casey, Kennedy, Schultz, Turner, Van Luvanee We read a one-off argument about topical pessimism Said fuck that topic |
Kentucky RR | 1 | Opponent: Marywashington | Judge: 1AC drones courts 1NC 2NR |
Kentucky RR | 3 | Opponent: Harvard BS | Judge: 1AC Chronopolitics 1NC Block 2NR |
Kentucky RR | 5 | Opponent: Wake | Judge: 1AC - Shaw TK aff 1NC - T Signiture strikes Block |
Kentucky RR | 8 | Opponent: MSU | Judge: 1AC - congress must authorize offensive force Block 2NR |
NDT | 2 | Opponent: Emory Dean-Klarman | Judge: Donlan, Eyzaguirre, Manuel K |
Ndt | 4 | Opponent: Kansas State Klucas-Mays | Judge: Fifelski, Haynal, Vega 1AC Tower of Bable |
Ndt | 4 | Opponent: Kansas State Klucas-Mays | Judge: Fifelski, Haynal, Vega 1AC Tower of Bable |
Ndt | 5 | Opponent: West Georgia Ard-Muhammad | Judge: Allsup, KOSLOW, loghry aff was same as on wiki |
PItt RR | 4 | Opponent: Kansas BC | Judge: Short 1AC-Al-Bihani |
Pitt RR | 2 | Opponent: Texas-Austin FM | Judge: Kyle Deming 1AC is the same aff on the Wiki where the United States Federal Government prohibits the introducing armed forces into hostilities on the justification of humanitarian intervention The impacts all derive from disrupting the practice of humanitarian intervention which results in external colonial violence and internal suppression of feminine methods of decision making The 1NC goes two off no case First is T that the aff constitutes a regulation not a restriction The next argument is a Kritik about how the aff criticizes Obama in particular The thesis is that the Aff's reading of Obama as the masculine protector elides an analysis of how black masculinity was patterned off the performances of masculinity of the white slave master The alternative is basically to deconstruct the historical categories of masculinityfemininity by interrogating the points of intersection between narratives of historical oppression 2AC responds to T that removing a justification for an action constitutes a restriction and responds to the K by several arguments no link the AFF critiques the way the office of the president is assigned the power of masculinity Alt can't solve it ignores questions of how we engage institutions to spur change humanitarian intervention is a specific practice that has a different historical trajectory than slavery perm do bothit is a question of opportunity cost the 1AC does not preclude the analysis called for by the alt 2NC takes the K and the 1NR takes some of the K and T The 2NR is the K |
Shirley | 4 | Opponent: West Georgia Ard-Muhammad | Judge: Hagwood BaudrillardFernando Topic K Ableism |
USC | 6 | Opponent: Vermont Brough-Broughton | Judge: Kelsie OU only ran Marriott Fanon psychoanalysis argument Won on this argument |
tournament | 3 | Opponent: Kansas Khatri-Schile | Judge: loghry 1AC warming treaties Block 2NR |
tournament | 8 | Opponent: UT San Antonio Morales-Pleitez | Judge: Albiniak 1AC reform 21 aff |
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Entry | Date |
---|---|
1NCTournament: Pitt RR | Round: 2 | Opponent: Texas-Austin FM | Judge: Kyle Deming Obama's performance of masculinity proves that black masculinity is fluid and can temporarily transcend blackness to aspire to be white masculinity -- however, ignoring the historical analyses that are necessary to understand black masculinity turns the aff. Because of the history of violence inflicted upon the black body, black men have come to emulate violenct forms of white masculinity that they were subject to -- this respahred black masculinity drastically. We must abandon the category of history and its regimes of representation. Vote negative to leap beyond History. Only a politics of invention can move beyond the prison bars or white being and time to transcend the Symbolic register of slavery and racism. | 1/25/14 |
1NC OOO KTournament: tournament | Round: 8 | Opponent: UT San Antonio Morales-Pleitez | Judge: Albiniak 1NCThe affirmatives focus on epistemology ? exclusion of the object and anthropocentrism – ontology must precede concerns with epistemologyBryant Professor of Philosophy at Collin College 2011 Levi Democracy of Objects http://quod.lib.umich.edu/o/ohp/9750134.0001.001/1:4/—democracy-of-objects?rgn=div1;view=fulltext 1NCTheir philosophical endeavor cannot address ecological catastrophe and ? correlationismBryant Professor of Philosophy at Collin College Srnicek PhD candidate in IR - London School of Economics 26 Harman professor of philosophy at the American University in Cairo 2011 Levi, Nick 26 Graham "Towards a Speculative Philosophy" The Speculative Turn: Continental Materialism and Realism pg 2-3 Correlationism is an ontotheology – makes equal ontological footing impossibleBryant Professor of Philosophy at Collin College 2011 Levi Democracy of Objects http://quod.lib.umich.edu/o/ohp/9750134.0001.001/1:5/—democracy-of-objects?rgn=div1;view=fulltext 1NCA democracy of objects demands a flattened ontology - its necessary to solve anthropocentrismBryant Professor of Philosophy at Collin College 2011 Levi Democracy of Objects http://quod.lib.umich.edu/o/ohp/9750134.0001.001/1:10/—democracy-of-objects?rgn=div1;view=fulltext 1NCAnthropocentrism should be rejected - it offers no lens to evaluate contemporary violenceCoward Senior Lecturer in International Politics at Newcastle University 2006 Martin Against Anthropocentrism Review of International Studies 32.3 Cambridge Journals Online OUR ALTERNATIVE IS TO REJECT THE VERY QUESTION OF THE AFFIRMATIVEThe alternatives movement away from correlationism is a necessary philosophical moveBryant Professor of Philosophy at Collin College 2011 Levi Democracy of Objects http://quod.lib.umich.edu/o/ohp/9750134.0001.001/1:4/—democracy-of-objects?rgn=div1;view=fulltext 1NCOur criticism choses to focus on objects through the lens of local manifestations 26 regimes of attraction – this is a necessary point of inquiryBryant Professor of Philosophy at Collin College 2011 Levi Democracy of Objects http://quod.lib.umich.edu/o/ohp/9750134.0001.001/1:9/—democracy-of-objects?rgn=div1;view=fulltext | 3/3/14 |
2NC1NRTournament: Pitt RR | Round: 2 | Opponent: Texas-Austin FM | Judge: Kyle Deming This orientation makes ethics impossible and violence inevitable--externalizing ethics onto the law is the worst form of violence because it exonerates individuals of responsibility for their relationship with the other which allows institutional violence across the board. Alternative Black Masculinity isn't as normalized as you assume--black masculinity is fluid and allows for feminist analysis. The alternative is to reject the aff. Our methodology entails a rearticulation of black masculine identity through affirmation of the Big Black Dick as the original weapon against American Exceptionalism. Bad Faith Link: Theory/Solvency Whiteness is a form of ambush--it lacks transparency even in the fight against racism. The deployment of theory and the assumption of solvency only replicate the self-denial of bad faith. Method: Ambush Solvency--Continuously Implicated in Whiteness. Combating whiteness is a continuous project of affirming the refusal to prolong it. This expanded notion of responsibility is beyond a single act of will, but living with the experiences of others in a way that is open to the risk of ambush. | 1/25/14 |
AbleismTournament: Shirley | Round: 4 | Opponent: West Georgia Ard-Muhammad | Judge: Hagwood 1NCUsing rhetoric of mental illness breeds the same types of impacts the AFF tries to solve. Terms such a`s "Islamoph`obia" prevent actual victims from seeking help. Block
| 11/17/13 |
Case 1NCTournament: Kentucky RR | Round: 3 | Opponent: Harvard BS | Judge: Safe guards mean launches have to be authorized and malfunctions can’t cause launches | 10/2/13 |
Case 1NC vs Wake Shaw AffTournament: Kentucky RR | Round: 5 | Opponent: Wake | Judge: Case"invisible" force is inherently violent because it assumes that there is inherent negativity around things that we cannot see – this justifies violence against those who cannot seeHibbitts Associate Professor Pittsburgh School of Law 1994 Bernard Cardozo Law Review lexis Causes genocide The Vegan Ideal 7 (http://veganideal.org/content/ableism-and-eugenics-peter-singer) The alternative won’t be to take no action; it will be expanded military strikesAnderson 11 (Kenneth, Law @ American U., "Efficiency in Bello and ad Bellum: Targeted Killing Through Drone Warfare", http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1812124)** Drones invert the moral presumptiveness in favor of supporting the troopsBrennan-Marquez 13 (Kiel, Yale-Philosopher, "A progressive defense of drones", http://www.salon.com/2013/05/24/a_progressive_defense_of_drones/)** Support the troops thinking makes war morally supportable – Drones invert that, generating a presumption against warBrennan-Marquez 13 (Kiel, Yale-Philosopher, "A progressive defense of drones", http://www.salon.com/2013/05/24/a_progressive_defense_of_drones/)** Drones don’t lower the threshold for warAnderson 11 (Kenneth, Law @ American U., "Efficiency in Bello and ad Bellum: Targeted Killing Through Drone Warfare", http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1812124)** Killing from a distance is routine in non-targeted killing 26 doesn’t lower the threshold for violenceAnderson 12 (Kenneth, American U – Law, "They Also Serve Who Sit and Wait In Cubicles Far Away, or, Mark Mazzetti, ’The Drone Zone’", http://www.lawfareblog.com/2012/07/mark-mazzetti-the-drone-zone-in-the-new-york-times-magazine/) Ground level intelligence proves drones are not distantAnderson 12 (Kenneth, American U – Law, "They Also Serve Who Sit and Wait In Cubicles Far Away, or, Mark Mazzetti, ’The Drone Zone’", http://www.lawfareblog.com/2012/07/mark-mazzetti-the-drone-zone-in-the-new-york-times-magazine/) All decisions to kill are difficult – Distance isn’t crucialCorn 12 (Jeffrey, Law @ South Texas, "Geoffrey Corn Responds to Mark Mazzetti, The Drone Zone", http://www.lawfareblog.com/2012/07/geoffrey-corn-responds-to-the-kas-post-on-mark-mazzettis-the-drone-zone/)** Face-to-face fighting raises the threshold for violenceAnderson 12 (Kenneth, American U – Law, "They Also Serve Who Sit and Wait In Cubicles Far Away, or, Mark Mazzetti, ’The Drone Zone’", http://www.lawfareblog.com/2012/07/mark-mazzetti-the-drone-zone-in-the-new-york-times-magazine/) Public debate won’t change opinions –The public has the info they want 26 is resistant to influenceCilliza 13 (Chris, founder and editor of The Fix, a leading blog on state and national politics. He is the author of The Gospel According to the Fix: An Insider’s Guide to a Less than Holy World of Politics and an MSNBC contributor and political analyst. He also regularly appears on NBC and NPR’s The Diane Rehm Show. He joined The Post in 2005 and was named one of the top 50 journalists by Washingtonian in 2009, "The American public loves drones", http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/02/06/the-american-public-loves-drones/)** Legal standards won’t solve inaccurate informationFCNL 12 (Friends Committee on Nat’l Legislation, Quaker lobby, "Drones Researchers Uncover Serious Problems", http://fcnl.org/issues/drones/researchers_problems_drones/) Plan won’t energize debateCFCIC 12 (Center for Civilians in Conflict, Columbia Law School, "THE CIVILIAN IMPACT OF DRONES: UNEXAMINED COSTS, UNANSWERED QUESTIONS", http://web.law.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/microsites/human-rights-institute/files/The20Civilian20Impact20of20Drones.pdf)** The President 26 CIA will interpret the plan minimally 26 inoculate against broader TK controlsCFCIC 12 (Center for Civilians in Conflict, Columbia Law School, "THE CIVILIAN IMPACT OF DRONES: UNEXAMINED COSTS, UNANSWERED QUESTIONS", http://web.law.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/microsites/human-rights-institute/files/The20Civilian20Impact20of20Drones.pdf)** Statutory authority wont generate debateCFCIC 12 (Center for Civilians in Conflict, Columbia Law School, "THE CIVILIAN IMPACT OF DRONES: UNEXAMINED COSTS, UNANSWERED QUESTIONS", http://web.law.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/microsites/human-rights-institute/files/The20Civilian20Impact20of20Drones.pdf)** JSOC takes-out; too secretCFCIC 12 (Center for Civilians in Conflict, Columbia Law School, "THE CIVILIAN IMPACT OF DRONES: UNEXAMINED COSTS, UNANSWERED QUESTIONS", http://web.law.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/microsites/human-rights-institute/files/The20Civilian20Impact20of20Drones.pdf)** JSOC evades the plan; restriction is a shell-gameCFCIC 12 (Center for Civilians in Conflict, Columbia Law School, "THE CIVILIAN IMPACT OF DRONES: UNEXAMINED COSTS, UNANSWERED QUESTIONS", http://web.law.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/microsites/human-rights-institute/files/The20Civilian20Impact20of20Drones.pdf)** | 10/3/13 |
Case 1NR vs Wake Shaw AffTournament: Kentucky RR | Round: 5 | Opponent: Wake | Judge: CaseThis criticism should not be dismissed – even if their choice was unintentional you should vote negative – visual metaphors represent a broader form of discrimination which will in the end overwhelm the power of the affirmative – their arguments about invisibility will be co-opted to justify violent dismissal of those who cannot see from the strategies of the affirmative – their politics will spill over to broader social movementsHibbitts Associate Professor Pittsburgh School of Law 1994 Bernard Cardozo Law Review lexis
| 10/3/13 |
Case BlockTournament: Kentucky RR | Round: 1 | Opponent: Marywashington | Judge: Xt 2 – Judges Won’t CheckRubber stamping turns the case – judges would accept more strikes than the executiveVladeck 13 (Steve, law @ American, "Why a Drone Court Won’t Work –But Nominal Damages Might…" http://www.lawfareblog.com/2013/02/why-a-drone-court-wont-work/) Courts won’t rule against the executiveGreenwald 13 (Glen, former con law, civil liberties reporter for The Guardian, "The bad joke called ’the FISA court’ shows how a ’drone court’ would work", http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/may/03/fisa-court-rubber-stamp-drones)** 2NC HEGTransition away from US hegemony will be stable- international institutions ensureIkenberry 2011 (G. John, Albert G. Milbank Professor of Politics and International Affairs at Princeton University, The Future of the Liberal World Order Subtitle: Internationalism After America, Foreign Affairs, May/June, lexis) Imperialism DA – AT: US Lash OutNOT UNIQUE – all of our evidence proves that lash-out is inevitable now – Iraq, Afghanistan etc prove US is aggressively intervening nowNo lash-out – historical studies proveMacDonald and Parent 2011 (Paul K. and Joseph M., Assistant Professor of Political Science at Williams College, Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Miami, International Security, Graceful Decline?; The Surprising Success of Great Power Retrenchment, Spring, lexis) | 10/2/13 |
Case vs Drone Courts 1NCTournament: Kentucky RR | Round: 1 | Opponent: Marywashington | Judge: Solvency1NC Solvency1. Surveillance courts fail 26 the FISA court proves that no political will exists to make the vague court they establish more effective than FISAGreenwald 13 (Glen, former con law, civil liberties reporter for The Guardian, "The bad joke called ’the FISA court’ shows how a ’drone court’ would work", http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/may/03/fisa-court-rubber-stamp-drones)** 2. Wont solves international opposition 26 judges will rubber-stampBloomberg 13 (News outlet, 2-13, "Why a ’Drone Court’ Won’t Work", http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-02-18/why-a-drone-court-won-t-work.html)** 3. This is offense – leads to legitimacy for executive overstretch 26 false confidence that power is checkedGreenwald 13 (Glen, former con law, civil liberties reporter for The Guardian, "The bad joke called ’the FISA court’ shows how a ’drone court’ would work", http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/may/03/fisa-court-rubber-stamp-drones)** 4. The President will reject the plan as an intervention on commander-in-chief powers 26 wont increase rule of law or due processNYT 13 (2-8, "Debating a Court to Vet Drone Strikes", http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/09/world/a-court-to-vet-kill-lists.html?pagewanted=all26_r=0)** 5. No adversarial hearings prevents solvencyEmpty Wheel 13 (blog, http://www.emptywheel.net/2013/02/10/garbage-in-garbage-out-the-problem-with-a-fisa-drone-court/)** 6. Emergency power creates exceptionsEpps 13 (Garrett, Con Law Baltimore, "Why a Secret Court Won’t Solve the Drone-Strike Problem", http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2013/02/why-a-secret-court-wont-solve-the-drone-strike-problem/273246/) 7. Monetary penalties are the worst case – Not a real checkEpps 13 (Garrett, Con Law Baltimore, "Why a Secret Court Won’t Solve the Drone-Strike Problem", http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2013/02/why-a-secret-court-wont-solve-the-drone-strike-problem/273246/) Courts won’t back up CongressFenster 8 (Mark, Law @ Florida, "Designing Transparency: The 9/11 Commission and Institutional Form", http://law.wlu.edu/deptimages/Law20Review/65-4Fenster.pdf)** 1. Lower courts won’t abide – Detainee rulings proveJohnson 12 (Dawn, Law @ Indiana, ""The Essence of a Free Society": The Executive Powers Legacy of Justice Stevens and the Future of Foreign Affairs Deference", http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=176926context=facpub)** 2. Vagueness prevents court solvencyEntin 12 (Justin, Dean of Law, Case Western, "War Powers, Foreign Affairs, and the Courts: Some Institutional Considerations", http://law.case.edu/journals/JIL/Documents/45CaseWResJIntlL1262.21.Article.Entin.pdf)** Their attempt to curb proliferation is based on racist paternalismLal 2009 (Prerna April 5 Freelance blogger for the immigart rights and race in America blog at Change.org, and serve as an Online Organizer for CoePINK: Women for PEACE. http://prernalal.com/2009/04/north-korea-is-not-a-threat-unveiling-hegemonic -discourse/TBC7/1/10-http://prernalal.com/2009/04/north-korea-is-not-a-threat-unveiling-hegemonic -discourse/TBC7/1/10) A2: Drone Prolif 1NC1. US isn’t keyAnderson 11 (Kenneth, International Law @ American University, 10/9, "What Kind of Drones Arms Race Is Coming?," http://www.volokh.com/2011/10/09/what-kind-of-drones-arms-race-is-coming/~~23more-51516-http://www.volokh.com/2011/10/09/what-kind-of-drones-arms-race-is-coming/) 3. Restraint won’t be modeledBoot 11 (Max, Fellow in National Security Studies at the Council on Foreign Relations, 10/9/11, "We Cannot Afford to Stop Drone Strikes," Commentary Magazine, http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2011/10/09/drone-arms-race)-http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2011/10/09/drone-arms-race) . Drone norms are not keyWang 13 (Zhengxu, Deputy Director of the China Policy Institute at the University of Nottingham, "Binding China to new superpower rules", http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/CHIN-03-230813.html)** 2. China won’t trust U.S. normsNathan 26 Scobell 12 (Andrew – Poli Sci @ Columbia, Andew – RAND, "The Sum of Beijing’s Fears", http://www.columbia.edu/cu/alliance/EDF-2012-documents/Reading_Nathan_2.pdf)** 3. Chinese drones are weakZhou 12 (Dillon, PhD IR – U Mass Boston, "China Drones Prompt Fears of a Drone Race With the US", http://www.policymic.com/articles/19753/china-drones-prompt-fears-of-a-drone-race-with-the-us)** Heg BadHeg Adv – 1NCPreponderance theory fails to explain the post-world war II era – history provesHuman Security Report Project 2011 Human Security Report Project is an independent research centre affiliated with Simon Fraser University (SFU) in Vancouver, Canada, Human Security Report 2009/2010: The Causes of Peace and the Shrinking Costs of War Heg Adv – 1NCHegemony doesn’t solve global conflictsMearsheimer 2011 (John J., R. Wendell Harrison Distinguished Service Professor of Political Science at the University of Chicago, The National Interest, Imperial by Design, lexis) US leadership is unsustainable and ? mass suffering, militarism and conflictBoggs 2005 (Carl, Professor of Social Science at National University, Imperial Delusions p. x-xiii) Heg Adv – 1NCMilitarism ? environmental destruction and extinctionSanders professor of History of Ideas and English at Pitzer College 2009 Barry Online Excerpt from The Green Zone: The Environmental Costs of Militarism | 10/2/13 |
Colonialism KTournament: NDT | Round: 2 | Opponent: Emory Dean-Klarman | Judge: Donlan, Eyzaguirre, Manuel The criticism is a prerequisite to any productive politics The law is inherently Eurocentric and the appearance of legality is used to disguise the colonialist intentions of the plan. The aff is just the democratization of public space – their inclusion of Yemeni journalists seeks to make the contestion of genocide a mode of democratic civil society. Instead of entering the prison we should center the stolen land. The 1AC is a typical response to the issue of immigration and remains profoundly silent on the question of the very land subject to access and migration towards. The plan action serves as a mask for the state, making it appear benevolent, even as its existence is contigent upon a continuing legacy of colonization that guarantees continued international exploitation and environmental degradation, turning the case. The alt is to reject the add and pursue indigenous land return as a first priority. This act is impossible realism solves the case – colonization is the root cause of oppression, environmental exploitation nuclearism and war. Only a return to an indigenous politics can remedy the ills of colonialism. | 3/28/14 |
Euphemism K 1NCTournament: Kentucky RR | Round: 5 | Opponent: Wake | Judge: Euphemism KTargeted killing is a euphemism that sanitizes and bureaucratizes a policy of sovereign violence and permanent warHealy 12 (Gene, VP of Cato Inst., "Drone-War Double-Think", http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/dronewar-doublethink)** Sanitized language makes military reality inevitable – Justifies atrocities like nuclear warCohn 87 (Carol, U Mass Boston, Gender Studies, "Sex and Death in the Rational World of Defense Intellectuals", http://www.ic.ucsc.edu/~~rlipsch/pol179/Cohn.pdf) | 10/3/13 |
Indians K 1NCTournament: Kentucky RR | Round: 3 | Opponent: Harvard BS | Judge: Deleuzean notions of becoming are destructive to indigenous strugges – their refusal of stable subjectivies is colonialismWuthnow U Canterbury 2002 Julie "Deleuze in the postcolonial: On nomads and indigenous politics" feminist Theory Sage publishing Deconstructing binaries doesn’t solve – historization is key to combate colonialism – this is in opposition to their openness to the future Your becoming cannot overcome the colonialism in your project and leads to the exclusion of indigenous epistemologiesWuthnow U Canterbury 2002 Julie "Deleuze in the postcolonial: On nomads and indigenous politics" feminist Theory Sage publishing Their deconstruction of time causes erasureWuthnow U Canterbury 2002 Julie "Deleuze in the postcolonial: On nomads and indigenous politics" feminist Theory Sage publishing There where is more important than the whenByrd ’11 Jodi, The Transit of Empire, Ass. Prof. of Indian Studies and English at U Illinois The alt is to reject the aff. You trade off with indigenous politics.Byrd ’11 Jodi, The Transit of Empire, Ass. Prof. of Indian Studies and English at U Illinois | 10/2/13 |
Marriott KTournament: USC | Round: 6 | Opponent: Vermont Brough-Broughton | Judge: Kelsie The 1AC’s politics remains trapped within the symbolic register of anti-blackness – to perform eroticism and the reclamation of the self as a black woman turns the aff’s court testimony into an event that falls back into the teleology of History – what else does this trial represent other than a delving into History’s crimes? Marriott 11 “Furthermore, the nature of colonialism necessarily affects the nature…psychoanalytic reading of culture.” Being the jury is a position of neutral judging that places Amber outside of the trial as an objective observer – the role of ‘judge’ is itself bound up in whiteness Wildman 5 “Catharine Wells explains that judging is ‘an inherently situated activity…the first step toward action.” The 1AC’s affirmation of agency is a politics of jubilee – a celebration of the trial of white supremacy that obscures negativity and attempts to carve out space outside of anti-blackness Sadiya Hartman and Frank Wilderson 2003, “The position of the Unthought” “But I think there’s a certain integrationist rights agenda that… relations of slavery was so key for me.” We must abandon the category of History and its regimes of representation. Vote negative to leap beyond History. Only a politics of invention can move beyond the prison bars of white being and time to transcend the Symbolic register of slavery and racism. “In the Conclusion…but only repeatedly traveled, and, therefore, not future at all.” 2NC Marriott evidence Marriott 11 “Of all the difficulties that will crop up in Black Skin, White Masks…that tends to repeat itself, as obsessive recollection.” | 1/4/14 |
Militarism BlockTournament: Kentucky RR | Round: 1 | Opponent: Marywashington | Judge: BlockALT ExRejecting crisis driven politics is essential to sustainable resistance to militarism – extend the 1NC Cuomo evidence – multiple arguments B) THE ENVIRONMENT – only the alternative provides a lens to solve for the environmental destruction caused by the build up and enactment of war Cuomo, Professor of Philosophy, 1996 Chris, Hypatia 11.4, proquest AND – embracing omnipresence of war is key to resist the violence the 1AC outlinesCuomo, Professor of Philosophy, 1996 Chris, Hypatia 11.4, proquest The plan leads to smart weapons dev’tCooper 2k (Neil, U of Plymouth, Peace Stud’s, "The pariah agenda and New Labour’s ethical arms sales policy", New Labour’s Foreign Policy: A new moral crusade?, Edited by Richard Little and Mark Wickham-Jones p. 157-8) Markets are fungible – Controlling one weapon increases anotherCooper 2k (Neil, U of Plymouth, Peace Stud’s, "The pariah agenda and New Labour’s ethical arms sales policy", New Labour’s Foreign Policy: A new moral crusade?, Edited by Richard Little and Mark Wickham-Jones p. 152-3) Bureaucratization Xt’sThe limited scope of the aff makes its opposition bureaucratic 26 normalizes the weapons outside its scope – The aff’s discourse will be redeployed for intervention, not against security more generallyCooper 11 (University of Bradford International Relations and Security Studies, Neil, "Humanitarian Arms Control and Processes of Securitization: Moving Weapons along the Security Continuum," Contemporary Security Policy, Vol 32, Issue 1, tandfonline, accessed 9-22-13) A2: Perm====The perm fails – It’s coopted==== Turner, Cooper, 26 Pugh 11 (Mandy, Neil, Michael – Peace Stud’s U of Bradford, "Institutionalised and co-opted", "Critical Perspectives on Human Security: Rethinking Emancipation and Power in International Relations." Edited by David Chandler and Nik Hynek, p. 93) ====The plan doesn’t ratchet up controls – Actively sidelines the alt==== Cooper 2k (Neil, U of Plymouth, Peace Stud’s, "The pariah agenda and New Labour’s ethical arms sales policy", New Labour’s Foreign Policy: A new moral crusade?, Edited by Richard Little and Mark Wickham-Jones p. 152) Leads to energy weaponsBhardwaj 13 (Parveen, Institute of Defence Studies and Analysis, New Delhi, "Directed Energy Weapons: New Frontier of Warfare", http://www.sspconline.org/opinion/DirectedEnergy_WeaponsNew_FrontierofWarfare_13052013)** Causes ASATs; turns ChinaNardon 10 (Laurence, French Inst of Int’l Relations, "THREATS TO THE SECURITY OF OUTER SPACE: EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES", http://kms2.isn.ethz.ch/serviceengine/Files/EINIRAS/109010/ichaptersection_singledocument/cc7016f1-c89b-43c8-b0c1-74e3088bf403/en/Chap2.pdf)** Leads to nuclear miscalc, accidents, 26 retaliationMarshall 94 (Gil, Central Florida Green Party, Global Network Against Weapons 26 Nuclear Power in Space, "ANTI-SATELLITE WEAPONS (ASATS)", http://www.space4peace.org/asat/asat.htm)** Testing alone causes extinctionMueller 13 (Karl, RAND Corporation, "The Absolute Weapon and the Ultimate High Ground: Why Nuclear Deterrence and Space Deterrence Are Strikingly Similar - Yet Profoundly Different", Anti-satellite Weapons, Deterrence and Sino-American Space OW NukesOutweighs nukesWood 94 (DAVID; NEWHOUSE NEWS SERVICE — Plain Dealer – March 20th – lexis) Kills 300,000 per yearGPF 6 (Global Policy Forum, Integrated Regional Information Networks, "Small Arms: The Real Weapons of Mass Destruction", http://www.globalpolicy.org/component/content/article/204/42564.html)** MiscalcConventional arms sales cause miscalcSACG 76 (Stanford Arms Control Group, "International Arms Control: Issues and Agreements", p. 280-1) ChinaArms sales cause China warAn 13 (Xiao, Chairman of the Board, Beiking Hualan Group, "US’ arms sales to Taiwan impede Sino-US relationship", http://www.china.org.cn/opinion/2013-01/17/content_27716480.htm)** Only limited sales now – Additional arms cause China conflictAitken 13 (Aaron, top undergraduate poli sci paper @ U of Alberta, CA, refereed publication from the U of Alberta, "The Future of U.S.-Taiwan Arms Sales", http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/ps_sandbox/article/download/19032/14712)** Arms sales hurt the economyPowell 4 (Kristiana, The report was published by Control Arms, a joint campaign of Oxfam, Amnesty International and the International Network on Small Arms (IANSA), in association with project partners Saferworld and Project Ploughshares, "The Impact of Arms Transfers on Sustainable Development: A review of the literature", http://ploughshares.ca/pl_publications/the-impact-of-arms-transfers-on-sustainable-development-a-review-of-the-literature/)** Arms transfers hurt overall growthHicks 12 (Sean, Ohio St. Honors Thesis, "Growth Under the Gun: An Empirical Examination of the Impact of Small Arms and Light Weapons Transfers to Central America and Mexico on Economic Development, 1995-2011.", http://kb.osu.edu/dspace/bitstream/handle/1811/54840/Sean_Hicks_Honors_Thesis_Final_Draft.pdf?sequence=1)** | 10/2/13 |
Miltiarism K 1NCTournament: Kentucky RR | Round: 1 | Opponent: Marywashington | Judge: Militarism KThe aff increases militarism and promotes war – They bureaucratize the other weapons they don’t’ have oversight ofTurner, Cooper, 26 Pugh 11 (Mandy, Neil, Michael – Peace Stud’s U of Bradford, "Institutionalised and co-opted", "Critical Perspectives on Human Security: Rethinking Emancipation and Power in International Relations." Edited by David Chandler and Nik Hynek, p. 87-90) Militarism causes extinctionHanrahanan 11+ Clare Hanrahanan associate member of Veterans for Peace 099, a contributing editor to War Crimes "Militarism and the "Economics of Extinction"" http://warisacrime.org/content/militarism-and-economics-extinction** Despite the horrific …all future generations.Our alternative is to reject the affirmatives crisis driven politics - this is key to create sustainable resistance to militaristic violenceCuomo, Professor of Philosophy, 1996 Chris, Hypatia 11.4, proquest | 10/2/13 |
NDT Round 8 - 1NCTournament: NDT | Round: 8 | Opponent: Harvard DT | Judge: Johnson, Shook, Spring Chalmers 11 (Malcolm, Nuclear Threat Initiative, “Words That Matter? NATO Declaratory Policy and the DDPR”, http://www.nti.org/media/pdfs/NTI_Framework_Chpt2.pdf?_=1322701473) Declarations of no first use mean nothing to our allies – we know it, they know it, and the plan changes nothing about that Unilateral declarations are considered non-binding, perceived to allow policy shifts, and not credible Meyer 11 (Paul, Simons Foundation Sr. Fellow, “Policy or posturing: The US nuclear posture review in an international context”, http://www.thesimonsfoundation.ca/sites/all/files/Policy20or20posturing-the20US20nuclear20posture20review20in20an20international20context20from20CIC's20International20Journal.pdf) This answers their “yes, we know the US is bad now, but the plan is a step in the right direction” argument – threshold for solvency is SUFFICIENCY not NECESSITY | 3/30/14 |
NDT r4Tournament: Ndt | Round: 4 | Opponent: Kansas State Klucas-Mays | Judge: Fifelski, Haynal, Vega Simulation K 1ncSimulation makes debate hyperreal. Devoid of passion and social relations all the values and education within debate become merely signs to be exchanged. Your vision of debate forces us into constant melancholy because we don’t know how to more the loss of meaning and inevitably collapses. Cyber war K 1NCYou are the prophets of cybergeddon, and your aff is an accumulation of signs locked into eschatology that can never be wrong. This eschatology both justifies the cyber security measures you criticize and desires the ectsacy whereby all prophecies are validated: extinctionStevens 14 Strategic cyber war is couched regularly The apparent immanence of the accident is a symptom of this paranoid eschatology.Stevens 14 The weaponisation and attempted civilian This thought-as-misforutne does not cure human suffering posits the world as it ought-never-have-been, affirming resentiment that labels the whole of humanity as criminals.Baudrillard -5 Thinking based on evil is Security is founded on the seesntment of difference which strikes away at all that makes life worthwhile. Only through an embracement of the inevitability of difference and insecurity can we affirm life.Der Derian 98 One must begin with Nietzsche’s idea The domain of cyber war itself is just a simulation; taxonomies and linguistics of cyber war use fear and technocratic jargon as abstractions designed to control and manipulate the public.Debrix 01 A National Security Agency advisers In answer to the affirmatives call to action, our alternative is to *Do nothing in the instance of the plan*Nietzsche 1879 Case 1ncThe first step to becoming politically irrelevant is the aff’s sovelncy mechanismKennedy 98 The first step toward this No risk of US launch without adequate evidence of nuclear attackWoolf 9 No retaliation without certaintyTrachtenberg 00 What is to be made of this Their fear of nuclear accidents is based on the fantasy of a perfect system of nuclear rationality thatis structurally impossibleChaloupka 92 This absurd outcome may be most | 3/29/14 |
Nietzsche FW 1NCTournament: Kentucky RR | Round: 3 | Opponent: Harvard BS | Judge:
2. Resolved proves the framework for the resolution is to enact a policy. 3.’Should’denotes an expectation the aff will be enacted. 4.The USFG is the government in Washington D.C. B. Violation: The Aff doesn’t defend the USFG increasing democracy assistance
A. Its key to growth, our argument isn’t just fairness, we say debate should be a sight for antagonism 2. Extra T: Even if the Aff claims to expand visa policy they claim benefits from the personal advocacy which allows them unpredictable advantages like spike outs. Independent voter for competitive equity. 3. Ground rooted in tradition is a prerequisite to political engagement— 4. Aff conditionality: The affirmative’s advocacy statement is unclear whether or not it includes USFG action. This allows 2AC clarification which destroys our ability to get stable offence in the 1NC. Any uncertainly over whether they meet our interpretation is not a risk that they meet but a reason to reject for Aff conditionality. Independent voter for competitive equity. | 10/2/13 |
Nietzsche FW 2NCTournament: Kentucky RR | Round: 3 | Opponent: Harvard BS | Judge: Switch-side debate solves your offense The political element in friendship is that in the truthful dialogue each of the friends The impact, again, is the very value of debate and how we value life. Agonistic competition within the dominant structures of debate fosters self-overcoming and creation. Their attempt at evading those institutions insulates the self against the forces of conformity that make struggle possible.Christa Davis Acampora, Professor of Philosophy at Hunter College of the City University of New York, 2002. ~and#34;Of Dangerous Games and Dastardly Deeds,and#34; International Studies in Philosophy, Vol. 34, No. 3~ | 10/2/13 |
Nietzsche Security KTournament: Kentucky | Round: 2 | Opponent: Southern California Purk-Vitzileos | Judge: Russell 1NCYour search for a transcendently ordered world opposes the world as it exists. This produces a violent will to order that attempts to eliminate chaos but will inevitably fail, breeding ressentiment.Saurette 1996 The liberal drive to make the other democratic like us is a herd mentally. It elevates liberal government to level of metaphysical truth justifying violent impositions on otherness such as Iraq as well as crushing creative power. The fact that you only care about indefinite detention because your Sulmasy evidence says it hurts the US image betrays your aff as slave morality. You don’t care about the people being detained, you only care about moral yardsticks from the outside. The impact is ressentiment. Security is founded on the ressentment of difference which strikes away at all that makes life worthwhile. Only through an embracement of the inevitability of difference and insecurity can we affirm life The world is will to power and nothing besides, making all of your impacts inevitable
The means to real peace.— No government admits any more that it keeps an BLOCKYou get the founding question of politics backwards. We must first ask what makes life worth living before we consider addressing extinction.Daniel W. Conway (professor and department head of philosophy at Texas A26M). Nietzsche and the Political. 1997. Page 2-4. Self perfection comes first - all other obligations are just illusions.Daniel Conway, Professor and Department Head 19th Century Philosophy at Texas A26M, 1997, Nietzsche and the Political, pg. 54 Even if you win Util applies, its bad:It’s a life negating herd mentality that subverts itself by threating survivalAnomaly ’5 Jonny Anomaly faculty fellow at the Parr Center for Ethics and a visiting professor at the Duke/UNC program in Philosophy, Politics, and Economics."Nietzsche’s Critique of Utilitarianism" The Journal of Nietzsche Studies, Issue 29, Spring 2005, pp. 1-15 Project Muse Counter-interpretation: You should evaluate all of our actions within the round as dramatizations of our perspectives towards life and vote for the most life affirming team.SMITH 2K7 ~daniel w., "deleuze and the question of desire: toward an immanent theory of ethics", parrhesia, number 2, 66-78~ Reject their frameworkBaudrillard ’94 1994 Jean Baudrillard prof @ Institut de Recherche et d’Information Socio-Économique at the Université de Paris-IX Dauphine The Illusion of the End Standford U Press Translated by Chris Turner pg 105-107 The aff’s threat framing is precisely the type of thinking that makes the imperial presidency possibleDr. Ghoshray 8 (Saby, specializes in Supreme Court jurisprudence, international law, comparative ? | 10/6/13 |
OOOK 2NCTournament: tournament | Round: 8 | Opponent: UT San Antonio Morales-Pleitez | Judge: Albiniak Link ExtCORRELATIONISM – extend Bryant – focus on epistemology puts the human at the forefront for their political question – two impactsONTOTHEOLOGY – their ontology replaces God with the subject position – it excludes any understanding of the objects role in producing its environment – their theory makes it impossible to confront environmental catastropheMcCarthy Environmental Studies, Westminster College 2012 Jeffrey Mathes Beyond romantic nature: ecocriticism’s new shades of green Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences Springer Link FLAT ONTOLOGY – Object Oriented Ontology begins from the premise that all object exist equally – this flattened understanding of ontology is necessary to resist anthropocentrism which offers no lens to evaluate contemporary violenceBryant Professor of Philosophy at Collin College 2011 Levi Democracy of Objects http://quod.lib.umich.edu/o/ohp/9750134.0001.001/1:5/—democracy-of-objects?rgn=div1;view=fulltext Link ExtEPISTEMOLOGIC FALLACY – the questions of the aff are fundamentally ontological – their focus on epistemology is based on an epistemic fallacy which makes flattened ontologies impossibleBryant Professor of Philosophy at Collin College 2011 Levi Democracy of Objects http://quod.lib.umich.edu/o/ohp/9750134.0001.001/1:5/—democracy-of-objects?rgn=div1;view=fulltext AT: PERMONTOLOGICAL COMPETITION – we read specific links to their epistemological basis and evidence that it is necessary to create an ontological division between their theory and ours – extend Bryant – they shouldn’t be able to sever the specificity of our criticism – this argument makes the permutation a non-starter in the world of flattened ontologies – every impact we read is a DA to the permutation because it attempts to fold ontological questions into epistemological onesThe permutation is correlationism because it tries to understand our ontology via its relationship to their advocacy – this very practice should be rejectedShaviro DeRoy Professor of English at Wayne State University 2010 Steven Consequences of Panpsychism http://ftp.shaviro.com/Othertexts/Claremont2010.pdf Human/Animal Distinction at Root of Modernity and ViolenceThe foundation of modernity is not anti-blackness but the human/non-human distinction which is a prerequisite to being able to label some people non-human and making judgments about the life-value of particular objects which allows them to be killed.Kochi 9 Tarik Kochi Sussex Law School, Essex House, University¶ of Sussex, Brighton "Species War: Law, Violence and Animals" Law, Culture and the Humanities 2009 5: 353¶ http://lch.sagepub.com/content/5/3/353.full.pdf Greek Slavery Was Justified by AnthroGreek systems of slavery and trading humans as property were intellectually justified by discourses of anthropocentrism: this is Aristotle 330 BCEFrom: Aristotle, The Politics of Aristotle, Benjamin Jowett, trans., (New York: Colonial Press, 1900), pp. 4-9; Fred Morrow Fling, ed., A Source Book of Greek History, (Boston: D. C. Heath, 1907), pp. 23-26, 29-30.nbsp;Scanned by: J. S. Arkenberg, Dept. of History, Cal. State Fullerton. Prof. Arkenberg has modernized the text. http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/ancient/greek-slaves.asp Soul Distinction Justifies Racism, Colonialism and GenocideThe way we treat animals has justified racism, colonialism and genocideKochi 9 Tarik Kochi Sussex Law School, Essex House, University¶ of Sussex, Brighton "Species War: Law, Violence and Animals" Law, Culture and the Humanities 2009 5: 353¶ http://lch.sagepub.com/content/5/3/353.full.pdf | 3/3/14 |
Simulation KTournament: tournament | Round: 3 | Opponent: Kansas Khatri-Schile | Judge: loghry The model of the code does not represent a prior social reality. It creates | 3/1/14 |
Spectrality KTournament: Harvard | Round: 8 | Opponent: Towson HW | Judge: 1NC? Hauntology First vs. PoliticsThe central question for ethics should be the specter. We should direct our ethics towards the other that is not present. Social Death (1NC)There is no social death and no social life. We are all simultaneously living and dying. Critiquing the abjection of the socially dead affirms the status quo ontology that assumes black social death and white social life when, in fact, spectrality haunts all life. Whiteness gains its power through the projection of its spectrality onto others.Peterson ’7 Christopher Peterson visiting assistant prof. of literature @ Claremont McKenna College Kindred Specters: Death, Mourning, and American Affinity pg 9-10 Body Link (if in 1AC or CX)The idea that we possess our bodies affirms a long history of western thought that concludes in the doctrine of possessive individualism that makes slavery possible.Peterson ’7 Christopher Peterson visiting assistant prof. of literature @ Claremont McKenna College Kindred Specters: Death, Mourning, and American Affinity pg 38-40 Body PossessionThe notion that this is my body is an appropriation that makes slavery inevitable. We must recognize our otherness to ourselves; the body cannot be owned.Peterson ’7 Christopher Peterson visiting assistant prof. of literature @ Claremont McKenna College Kindred Specters: Death, Mourning, and American Affinity pg 34-36 ReversibilityThe attempt to bring the excluded into the ontological field is a logic of reversal that maintains the ontological differentiation that recognizes some as dead and others as alive. Debate is a potentially dangerous technology. Imbuing the ballot with the power to give life also gives it the power to take it away.Peterson ’7 Christopher Peterson visiting assistant prof. of literature @ Claremont McKenna College Kindred Specters: Death, Mourning, and American Affinity pg 11-12 Alterity DAWhat about those who do not want war powers? Your claim that the solution to Sapphire’s story is war powers posits of an originary that effaces otherness by reducing them to the same.Peterson ’7 Christopher Peterson visiting assistant prof. of literature @ Claremont McKenna College Kindred Specters: Death, Mourning, and American Affinity pg 81 Sacrifice of OthernessChallenging the sacrifice of otherness is key to justice. The framing question should be ’is any alterity effaced by the aff?’. If yes then the only ethical response is deconstruction.Derrida 1995, dir d’etudes @ Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales Jacques, The Gift of Death 83-7 Justice ImpactJustice is the undeconstructable condition for any deconstruction. It is the only ethical response in the face of the collision of undecidability and responsibility.McQuillan, 2k9 (Martin, MA, PhD, Glasgow, Deconstruction After 9/11, Routledge, pg. 85-87)
AltThe alternative is our deconstruction of the aff. The negation of the 1NC exposes the arbitrariness of the categories of meaning we criticize. We recognize that viewpoints inevitably come from a particular place, and it our case it is that of white, male, privileged debaters. We think that our role should be to deconstruct structures of oppression, and that this deconstruction must be infinite because every act of interpretation is an imposition on otherness.MacDonald Department of Political Studies, Queens University 1999 Eleanor Science 26 Society 63.2 proquest Life/Death Boundary (Alt?)The attempt to put life into social death simply reverses the ontological binary of white heterosexual oppression. We should deconstruct rather than reverse this binary.Peterson ’7 Christopher Peterson visiting assistant prof. of literature @ Claremont McKenna College Kindred Specters: Death, Mourning, and American Affinity pg 4-7 Presencing Social DeathPresencing social death facilitates its immobilization and controlPeterson ’7 Christopher Peterson visiting assistant prof. of literature @ Claremont McKenna College Kindred Specters: Death, Mourning, and American Affinity pg 64-65 Overparticularity Bad – Social DeathOverparticularization of death bad: we all experience death as a condition of having a body. Your insistence on the unique of the death of the oppressed reinscribes American exceptionalsim by allowing it to project its death onto the oppressed.Peterson ’7 Christopher Peterson visiting assistant prof. of literature @ Claremont McKenna College Kindred Specters: Death, Mourning, and American Affinity pg 12-14 What I am calling redoubled ghostliness situates racial and sexual¶ minorities in intimate contact 2NCAsserting the BodyThe affirmation of the body reduces the oppressed to the status of a mere thing.Peterson ’7 Christopher Peterson visiting assistant prof. of literature @ Claremont McKenna College Kindred Specters: Death, Mourning, and American Affinity pg 58-59 AT PermThe permutation is a metaphysics of presence that attempts to assimilate our alt. We must reject any union of opposites.Peterson ’7 Christopher Peterson visiting assistant prof. of literature @ Claremont McKenna College Kindred Specters: Death, Mourning, and American Affinity pg 32-33 American kinship, then, corresponds to a certain "metaphysics of presence" in AT You Project Yourself on US, SelfishWe don’t lead to self-projecting. Our hauntology is possessed by the alternative of the other that it cannot possess. Only your ethic of recognition leads to appropriation and projection.Peterson ’7 Christopher Peterson visiting assistant prof. of literature @ Claremont McKenna College Kindred Specters: Death, Mourning, and American Affinity pg 15-16 AT You Incorporating The Other/Absolute OthernessThe attempt to incorporate the other is inevitable and necessary for ethics but it inevitably fails solving your impactsPeterson ’7 Christopher Peterson visiting assistant prof. of literature @ Claremont McKenna College Kindred Specters: Death, Mourning, and American Affinity pg 73 Absolute OthernessAttempts to relate the other to the self are violent but they are also inevitable. The key to ethics is the acknowledgement of this originary violence. The pursuit of absolute otherness leads to a total effacement of alterity.Peterson ’7 Christopher Peterson visiting assistant prof. of literature @ Claremont McKenna College Kindred Specters: Death, Mourning, and American Affinity pg 71-72 AT Otherness is AbsoluteAbsolute otherness fails because the other must always be imagined as absolutely other in relation to me.Peterson ’7 Christopher Peterson visiting assistant prof. of literature @ Claremont McKenna College Kindred Specters: Death, Mourning, and American Affinity pg 16-17 AT Slaves Have No KinYour argument that slaves have no kin is historically inaccurate and your insistence on only recognizes those relations that society does reinscribes the binary between social life and social death.Peterson ’7 Christopher Peterson visiting assistant prof. of literature @ Claremont McKenna College Kindred Specters: Death, Mourning, and American Affinity pg 33-34 This interimplication of slavery and kinship, as I noted above,¶ is denied by | 10/27/13 |
T AuthorityTournament: Kentucky | Round: 1 | Opponent: USC PV | Judge: Authority requires perceived legitimacy – Critical to precisionLake 4 (David, UCSD Poli Sci, "Hierarchy in International Relations: Authority, Sovereignty, and the New Structure of World Politics", http://bc.sas.upenn.edu/system/files/Lake_04.21.05.pdf)** Rousse 13 (8-7, Patrick, IT U of Copenhagen, "Procedural Justice as Procedural Rhetoric", Ludist: A Jnl of Play, http://www.ludist.com/?p=729)**
Marshall 8 (William, Law-UNC, "ELEVEN REASONS WHY PRESIDENTIAL POWER | 10/5/13 |
T HostilitiesTournament: Kentucky RR | Round: 8 | Opponent: MSU | Judge: Hostilities is a term of art; includes attacks, but not all armed conflictJohanson 9 (Sigrid, Norwegian Military attache "Incompetent Resistance? Core Aspects of Civilian Direct Participation In Hostilities", https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/22072/90970.pdf?sequence=1)** Hostilities is narrower than conflict – Refers to actual acts of violenceMcDonald 4 (Avril, Asser Inst., "THE CHALLENGES TO INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW AND THE PRINCIPLES OF DISTINCTION AND PROTECTION FROM THE INCREASED PARTICIPATION OF CIVILIANS IN HOSTILITIES", http://www.asser.nl/default.aspx?site_id=926level1=1333726level2=13379)** | 10/5/13 |
T Judical RestrictionTournament: Kentucky RR | Round: 1 | Opponent: Marywashington | Judge: Neg T – Judicial Restrictions Mandate Congressional OversightInterpJudicial restrictions in the resolutional context are limited to mandating congressional oversightTribe 26 Gudridge 4 (Laurence 26 Patrick, Harvard 26 Miami L.S., "The Anti-Emergency Constitution", 113YALE L.J. 1801) Youngstown proves – It’s the prototype for judicial restriction of presidential authorityLobel 7 (Jules, Pitt – Law, "The War on Terrorism and Civil Liberties", http://chapters.rlpgbooks.com/07/425/0742535983ch2.pdf)** Violation – The plan regulates presidential power without imposing a judicial restriction.Standards –Limits – Evaluating congressional oversight limits case lawGlennon 2 (Michael, Woodrow Wilson Center, legal expert, "APPLYING THE WAR POWERS RESOLUTION TO And, Court power is naturally unlimited – the aff opens the floodgatesMaltbe 1912 (Milo, NY Public Service Commission of the 1st District, Transit Journal, vol 39, p. 398) 2. Precision – Their evidence will refer to judicial interference, prohibitions, etc. Our evidence specifies the scope of judicial restrictions, and is directly pertaining to the content of restrictions alone.Topic coherence – The combination of congressional and judicial requirements could unlimit the topic by imposing a variety of disparate mechanisms. This interp of judicial restrictions links it up with the requirement that statutory restrictions be congressional, unifying a single mechanism. We should have one mechanism because the four areas of the topic already allow for aff diversity.T is a voting issue for competitive equity 26 fairness. | 10/2/13 |
T PresidentTournament: Harvard | Round: 2 | Opponent: Georgetown EM | Judge: T – Presidential Authority1. The executive branch is distinct from the presidencyWhite House.gov ("The Executive Branch", http://www.whitehouse.gov/our-government/executive-branch)** 2. The plan says executive, not presidential, authority.3. Plan text is key – It’s the only objective test, critical for CP 26 K ground bc of competition, and is the linchpin of aff power to parametrics. Err neg bc it’s their choice.4. Ground – Rogue agencies, presidential enforcement, covert ops, and black budget disads are core neg ground. We should be able to say that other parts of the executive are outside the President’s capacity to control.5. Extra-T is a VI – Competing interps requires. Allows the aff to load up on one-word additions to the plan that the neg has to spend time fighting. Time is strategy. This T arg is longer than a rogue agencies card would be, for instance.6. T is a VI for competitive equity. | 10/26/13 |
T Signiture StrikesTournament: Kentucky RR | Round: 5 | Opponent: Wake | Judge: TK/= Sig Strikes T – 1NC=== A. Definitions1. TK requires individual targetingSell 11 (Daniel, JD-Capitol U., "THE UNITED STATES’ POLICY OF TARGETED KILLING AND THE USE OF FORCE: ANOTHER EXCEPTION TO THE UNITED NATIONS USE OF FORCE REGIME", http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2167770)** 2. Signature strikes are distinctAnderson 11 (Kenneth, Law @ American, Hoover Institution visiting fellow, member of Hoover Task Force on National Security and Law; nonresident senior fellow, Brookings Institution, 8-29-11, "Distinguishing High Value Targeted Killing and "Signature" Attacks on Taliban Fighters," http://www.volokh.com/2011/08/29/distinguishing-high-value-targeted-killing-and-signature-attacks-on-taliban-fighters/, accessed 9-13-13) B. Violation – The aff affects signature strikes.C. Limits – Their interp explodes the topicSilva 3 (Sébastian Jose, U of Montreal Masters Thesis "Death for life : a study of targeted killing by States in international law," https://papyrus.bib.umontreal.ca/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1866/2372/11474222.PDF;jsessionid=4D1530E8E8F2DEE3B4C68BA4B7997F3B?sequence=1)** D. T is a VI – Competitive equity. | 10/3/13 |
T Substantially Increase StatutoryTournament: Harvard | Round: 2 | Opponent: Georgetown EM | Judge: Neg T – Substantially Increase Statutory RestrictionsInterpSubstantially requires clarity and precisionCourt Watch 2 (Report to the WVA Chamber of Commerce, http://www.wvchamber.com/CWT/External/WCPages/WCWebContent/WebContentPage.aspx?ContentID=979)** Increase requires pre-existenceRipple, 87 (Circuit Judge, Emmlee K. Cameron, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Frances Slocum Bank 26 Trust Company, State Automobile Insurance Association, and Glassley Agency of Whitley, Indiana, Defendants-Appellees, 824 F.2d 570; 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 9816, 9/24, lexis) Statutory restrictions limit based on controlling legislationBlacks Law (http://thelawdictionary.org/statutory-restriction/)** Therefore, the plan should specify the statutory restriction codified in US law that the plan increases. The aff fails to do so.Standards –Limits – Hypothetical new laws are unlimited. The US Code itself is enormous. Clarity is crucial to predictabilityBaker 26 Bennett 4 (John 26 Dale – LSU Law Center, "MEASURING THE EXPLOSIVE GROWTH OF FEDERAL CRIME LEGISLATION", http://fedsoc.server326.com/Publications/practicegroupnewsletters/criminallaw/crimreportfinal.pdf)** Bright line – Our interpretation includes 26 excludes with a simple test: is the plan in the US Code? Avoids arbitrary interpretation inevitable with any competing standard.Grammatical precision – We make substantially increase significant. Any other method for evaluating legal change allows the aff to simply affect the law without substantial impact, allowing a plethora of tiny bureaucratic changes that avoid disads 26 case negative ground. Debate is better when it is detailed and specific.T is a voting issue for competitive equity 26 fairness. | 10/26/13 |
Topic PIKTournament: Kentucky | Round: 9 | Opponent: Towson Johnson-Ruffin | Judge: Casey, Kennedy, Schultz, Turner, Van Luvanee At this point, I can... ...a bridge, a great promise. The internalization of the topic is microfascism, which is pretty bad To be anti-oedipal is to... ...nomads (no habits, no territories). Topics - who needs em? (Alt is to forget the topic) On the other hand, guilt... ...and mortify our (new) passion. | 10/17/13 |
Topic PIK - 2NCTournament: Kentucky | Round: 9 | Opponent: Towson Johnson-Ruffin | Judge: Casey, Kennedy, Schultz, Turner, Van Luvanee We have attempted to analyze... ...("Ah, so that's what it was!") Their response to the hail of the topic is a mutual embrace - the topic WILL hug back, and it'll be fascist Once the socius becomes fixed... ...ritual objects, rights, presitge, and status. Exhausting the topic is a better approach - trying to reappropriate it only allows it to suck in critical energy and use frenetic desire to do the productive work of anti-black debate. Invest energy in not-the-topic. The process of the cure... ...competition, acquisition, possession, and accumulation. The role of white debaters is to witness - this is only possible if the topic's not standing in the way. Having others to whom a... ...voices in relation with others. | 10/17/13 |
Will K 1NCTournament: Kentucky RR | Round: 5 | Opponent: Wake | Judge: 1NCPresident/Leader Focus Link (1NC)Focus the president ensures the aff will only strengthen the will to will, which renders all humans standing reserve. The actions of leaders are merely the effects, not the cause of this process.MITCHELL 2005 ANDREW J. MITCHELL Associate Professor of Philosophy @ Emory "HEIDEGGER AND TERRORISM" Research in Phenomenology, 35 p 188-90 The plan frames targeted killing as a juridical problem to be regulated rather than a normative problem to be ruled on – The aff asks the wrong question: it’s not how should we use targeted killing, but should we use targeted killing at all. Disrupting the law’s normative power is critical to solveKrasmann 12 (Susanne, prof. Dr, Institute for Criminological Research, University of Hamburg, "Targeted Killing and Its Law: On a Mutually Constitutive Relationship," Leiden Journal of International Law (2012), 25, pg. 678) Devastation Outweighs ExtinctionDevastation is the end result of the will that renders all beings as exchangeable standing reserve. The world becomes an unworld devoid of life and full of terror. Extinction would be a respite from this condition.MITCHELL 2005 ANDREW J. MITCHELL Associate Professor of Philosophy @ Emory "HEIDEGGER AND TERRORISM" Research in Phenomenology, 35 p 206-207 Alt Do NothingThe alt is to do nothing in the instance of the aff. This allows being to rest and short-circuits the will, which can only devastate the earth.MITCHELL 2005 ANDREW J. MITCHELL Associate Professor of Philosophy @ Emory "HEIDEGGER AND TERRORISM" Research in Phenomenology, 35 p 211-213 | 10/3/13 |
Will K 2NCTournament: Kentucky RR | Round: 5 | Opponent: Wake | Judge: Transparency/DemocracyYou assumption that if people only knew or if some procedural checks were instituted these horrible practices would stop masks the fact that majorities support these practices and the state will always skirt procedure with semiotic manipulation.Kroker 11/1/2006 Arthur Kroker is Canada Research Chair in Technology, Culture and Theory and Professor of Political Science at the University of Victoria, Canada. "BORN AGAIN IDEOLOGY: Religion, Technology, and Terrorism" http://www.ctheory.net/articles.aspx?id=549** Anxiety 2NCInauthentic relationships to death reduce us to the they-self and make life meaningless and reduce it to a biological truism.Magrini 6 James Magrini prof. of Phil. @ the College of DuPage ""Anxiety" in Heidegger’s Being and Time: The Harbinger of Authenticity" Philosophy Scholarship. Paper 15. http://dc.cod.edu/philosophypub/15-http://dc.cod.edu/philosophypub/15 If we win any link the aff forcloses the alt because external political goals are drowned out by the monologue of the will. That’s Mitchell.KOUROS 97 Second, the continued successes of technological thought blinds us to the fact that it Ontology is a prerequisite to ethics and its abandonment results in infinite violenceGauthier, ’4 | 10/3/13 |
ndt round 5 1ncTournament: Ndt | Round: 5 | Opponent: West Georgia Ard-Muhammad | Judge: Allsup, KOSLOW, loghry academy is new pedagogy--they cause microfascism they make shit visible cant predict necessity of the moment--they prevent necessity of revolution thru teleology only revolution w/o a telos reject the 1ac--prefer endless study to teleology q of method vs method--no perms | 3/29/14 |
Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
---|
Air Force
Amherst
Appalachian State
Arizona State
Army
Augustana
Bard
Baylor
Binghamton
Boston College
Capital
CSU Long Beach
CSU Northridge
CSU Sacramento
CUNY
Cal Berkeley
Cal Lutheran
Cal Poly SLO
Case Western
Central Florida
Central Oklahoma
Chico
Clarion
Columbia
Concordia
Cornell
Dartmouth
Denver
Drexel-Swarthmore
ENMU
East Los Angeles College
Eastern Washington
Emory
Emporia
Fayetteville State
Florida
Florida Int'l
Florida State
Fordham
Fresno State
Fullerton
Gainesville State
George Mason
George Washington
Georgetown
Georgia
Georgia State
Georgia Tech
Gonzaga
Harvard
Houston
Idaho State
Illinois
Illinois State
Indiana
Iowa
Irvine/SFSU
James Madison
John Carroll
Johns Hopkins
Johnson County CC
KCKCC
Kansas
Kansas State
Kentucky
LA City College
Lakeland
Lewis-Clark State College
Liberty
Lindenwood
Los Rios
Louisville
Loyola
Macalester
Marist
Mary Washington
Mercer
Methodist
Miami FL
Miami OH
Michigan
Michigan State
Minnesota
Mission
Missouri State
NYU
Navy
New School
North Texas
Northern Iowa
Northwestern
Notre Dame
Ohio Wesleyan
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pepperdine
Piedmont
Pittsburgh
Portland State
Princeton
Puget Sound
Redlands
Richmond
Rochester
Rutgers
Samford
San Diego State
San Francisco State
Santa Clara
South Florida St Pete
Southern Methodist
Southwestern
Stanford
Texas State
Texas-Austin
Texas-Dallas
Texas-San Antonio
Texas-Tyler
Towson
Trinity
U Chicago
UCLA
UDC-CC
UMKC
UNLV
USC
Utah
Vanderbilt
Vermont
Virginia Tech
Wake Forest
Wash U (St. Louis)
Washburn
Washington
Wayne State
Weber
West Georgia
West Virginia
Western Connecticut
Whitman
Wichita State
Wisconsin Oshkosh
Wyoming