Tournament: CEDA | Round: 7 | Opponent: Towson BU | Judge: Copenhaver
Poetry cited at the bottom.

Because I do not hope to turn again… now and at the hour of our death.

I learned yesterday…we, the born capitalists

If the lost word is lost, if the spent word is spent…O my people.

Europe is the … beyond the reservoir of stars.

Well…can never be touched.

Although I do not hope to turn again…Unbroken wings

laugh if you like … real place.

from http://www.msgr.ca/msgr-7/ash_wednesday_t_s_eliot.htm and http://www.surrealism-plays.com/Artaud.html and Thirst for Annihilation (by Nick Land)

Tournament: UTD | Round: 3 | Opponent: JCCC BF | Judge: A Morgan
Both Teams gotta take a stance on carnism. Our practice is veganism.
Joy, no date, author of Carnism, speech transcribed by Kelly G.
http://challengeoppression.com/2010/01/17/carnism-meat-deconstructed/ JTC

Carnism is the ... the invisible, visible.¶ 

Dialogue is insufficient – We have to render our diets up to political examination in order to expand our antiracist politics.
Harper ‘10
Breeze Harper, as a Ph.D. candidate in geography at the University of California, Davis, explores Critical Race, Critical Whiteness, Postcolonial, Decolonial, and Feminist theories, can be employed as analytical tools within Critical Food Geographies.
Jun , 2010. The Sistah Vegan Project, “Veganism’s connection to antiracist social-justice network.” http://www.thescavenger.net/animals/veganism-connection-to-antiracistsocial-justicework48676-280.html
Though there are ... enslaved nonhuman animals. 

Alt – Harper; Veganism as force for Social Progress

Harper ‘10
Breeze Harper, as a Ph.D. candidate in geography at the University of California, Davis, explores Critical Race, Critical Whiteness, Postcolonial, Decolonial, and Feminist theories, can be employed as analytical tools within Critical Food Geographies.
Jun , 2010. The Sistah Vegan Project, “Veganism’s connection to antiracist social-justice network.” http://www.thescavenger.net/animals/veganism-connection-to-antiracistsocial-justicework48676-280.html

Now, are we ...¶ Let’s start now

Tournament: CEDA | Round: 2 | Opponent: UTD LO | Judge: Bill Russell
Nuclear winter causes fast timeframe extinction of physical existence and that is the ultimate good – causes nirvana – superior to individual suffering, death, suicide and grief as we go one by one in this meaningless torture chamber – our evidence assumes their counter arguments.
Dolan ‘2 (John Dolan, PhD in the writing of the Marquis de Sade from UC Berkeley, professor and essayist, “The Case for Nuclear Winter,” April 21, 2002, http://www.exile.ru/articles/detail.php?ARTICLE_ID=6495andIBLOCK_ID=35) M Leap

There are no … and then Nirvana. 

The factory farm is worse than human extinction both quantitatively and qualitatively.
Ball ‘03  (Matt, January 5, 2003, Vegan Outreach, Working in Defense of Animals, http://www.veganoutreach.org/enewsletter/20030105.html)

A few years ..minute of every day.

Humans force animals in factory farms to endure a fate worse than death
Mitchell ‘03 (Brian's Poultry Services Investigation “Statement of Whistleblower Sally Mitchell”http:www.goveg.com/brianspoultry_sally.asp)

The next barn … journey to slaughter.

Tournament: UNT | Round: 4 | Opponent: KCKCC FG | Judge: A Denney
Vote neg
Competition – we should construct debate as a site for agonistic conflict. They make debate impossible by channeling our strategy into their weak points.
Yovel 3
(Jonathan Yovel  Yale Law School; University of Haifa - Faculty of Law Cardozo Law Review, Vol. 24, pp. 635-662, 2003  HALF-WRITTEN LAWS: NIETZSCHE AND LEGAL THEORY, Peter Goodrich and Mariana Velvedere, eds., Routledge 2005 http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=950742)

While reactive forces … natural and social.

Limits – arbitrary interpretations are inevitable and good; we must enforce interpretations grounded in the community to allow for agonism
Ramaeker 1
(STEFAN RAMAEKERS assistant professor at Laboratory for Education and Society Journal of Philosophy 0f Education, Vol. 35, No. 2, 2001 “Teaching to Lie and Obey: Nietzsche on Education “http:www.wehavephotoshop.com/PHILOSOPHY20NOW/PHILOSOPHY/Nietzsche/Nietzsche20On20Education.pdf)

Much as one … point of view.

Purposelessness - we shouldn’t ascribe a telos to debate.  It doesn’t change anything in the real world and all the education can be gained from reading; the value to debate is the aesthetics of the struggle.
Lane 96
(Robert D. Lane, Classics, Philosophy, and Religious Studies/ Institute of Practical Philosophy  Vancouver Island University “The Absurd Hero” http://records.viu.ca/www/ipp/absurd.htm)

Sisyphus is the … abstractions or 'absolutes'.

Tournament: CEDA | Round: 2 | Opponent: UTD LO | Judge: Bill Russell
A. Violation –
1 -~-- the 1AC reads like a Frankenstein of information condensed to its most minimalist and bumper-stickered form – you should critically evaluate the quality of their evidence – if it doesn’t meet a reasonable threshold for coherence send them home to cut better cards
Coverstone 2005
(Alan, Master in Communication – Wake Forest University, "Acting On Activism: Realizing the Vision of Debate with a Pro-Social Impact", NCA Paper, 11-17, Not Online – Email charrigan@gmail.com For It)

Unfortunately, the education … American political discourse.
?
2--Their view of sovereign power holds life in its grips while creating a meta-stasis that has no way of challenging the ontological roots of the treatment, categorization, and management of bodies.
Wadiwel 2002
(Dinesh Joesph, PhD University of Western Sydney, “Cows and Sovereignty: Biopower and Aimal Life”, Bordlerlands V 1 #2) JTC
18. But such a … by both entities.

The plan’s unspoken grammar replicates a banality of evil that lies at the heart of modernity – It is an ethical imperative that we repair the caesura that is responsible for an ongoing holocaust unlike the world has ever seen.
Kochi and Ordan 2k8
Queens U. “An Argument for the Global Suicide of Humanity” Published Journal, this card has been around. JTC
 In one sense, … a  certain complicity

4 -- The Law is an Empty Canal – the 1AC labors along-side it as if the waters of revelation still flowed through its channels – the 1AC is the Nothing of Revelation, an invocation of sovereign law that can only ever be an empty gesture – reject the 1AC’s politics of abandonment
Whyte 2009
(Jessica, University of Western Sydney Faculty, Law Critique, “I Would Prefer Not To: Giorgio Agamben, Bartleby and the Potentiality of the Law”, http://www.academia.edu/325700/I_Would_Prefer_Not_To_Giorgio_Agamben_Bartleby_and_the_Potentiality_of_the_Law?, CL)

The Law is … force without content.
?
5-~-- The academy is the new factory – the affirmative positions the plan in relation to knowledge as a tool of transaction that reduces education to commodity-status – their energizing of the rat race of pedagogy is the ultimate form of micro-fascism – prefer impotence ?
Lewis 11
(Tyson E., Montclair State University, Faculty, “Rethinking the Learning Society: Giorgio Agamben on Studying, Stupidity, and Impotence”, Springer Science+Business Media, 2011, http://www.academia.edu/2434199/Rethinking_the_Learning_Society_Giorgio_Agamben_on_Studying_Stupidity_and_Impotence, CL)

Recently there have … not adequately addressed.

B. Vote Negative –
-~-- The aff produces information overload – debate has been seduced by a drive toward the zero point of information that strips claims naked of their warrants, depth, and meaning – this ensures the same knowledge recirculates endlessly and that debate implodes under its own hyper-density
Baudrillard, ’92 (Jean, Pataphysics of Year 2000, online LH)

Outside of this …stereophony of information. 

Bet on the opposition to the enlightenment subject the 1AC endorses in favor of a politics of contingency and difference outside of the tradition of objectivity and rationality.
MacLure 2010 (Maggie MacLure,  Manchester Metropolitan University, “Qualitative inquire: where are the ruins?” http://www.esri.mmu.ac.uk/respapers/nzareRuins.pdf)

I want to … to be heard.  

And,

Reject their Performance of Pre-Emption within the First Affirmative Constructive. 

Starting Communication with Pre-Emption Must Be Rejected – Attempts to Track and Predict Opponents Collapses Deliberation – It Produces a Situation Where ‘Coincidence’ Takes the Place of ‘Communication’
Crandall, 2k6. (Jordan Crandall, Media Artist, Theorist, Assistant Professor of Visual Arts @ the Univ of California. “Precision + Guided + Seeing” 1000 Days of Theory. Ctheory. Online @ http://www.ctheory.net/articles.aspx?id=502#bio )

When, in a …of the visible. 

Empirical research proves even policy recommendations from highly-renowned IR scholars very rarely get utilized in government policies. To think your college debate aff will be the one that sticks is just more nihilism
Norman, 11 (Johan, 2011, “Political Utilisation of Scholarly Ideas: The ‘Clash of Civilisations’ vs. ‘Soft Power’ in US Foreign Policy,” Review of International Studies, Ph.D candidate Department of Government, Uppsala University)
IR scholars concerned …l and symbolic usage.

Tournament: Wichita | Round: 5 | Opponent: UTD MV | Judge: Fifelski
Strategic Silence
Churchill 96 (Ward, Codirector of The Colorado Chapter of The American Indian Movement, Former Professor of Ethnic Studies at The University of Colorado/Boulder, "I Am Indigenist, from a Native Son Pgs -89-94") 

Your epistemology is built on stolen land— Your theory effaces and defers the Settler Colonialism of Empire, which ensures the continued genocide of indigenous people.
Byrd, 2011 (Jodi,  The Transit of Empire, Assistant Professor of American Indian Studies and English at the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign. – Chickasaw)
Despite scholars’ acknowledgments of the coterminous processes of imperialism and colonialism located along the axes
AND
is my attempt to consider how and why that might be the case.
The Indian’s absence is the ontological prior through which your epistemology functions. This parallax gap is the imperialist drive behind environmental destruction and world war.
Byrd, 2011 (Jodi,  The Transit of Empire, Assistant Professor of American Indian Studies and English at the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign. – Chickasaw)
To that end, the first chapter interrogates the Indian errant at the heart of
AND
States continues its global wars on terror, the environment, and livability.
Your epistemology’s deferral of colonialism perpetuate the violent collisions and cacophony that make the transit of global empire possible— Your epistemology of oppression ignores Settler Colonialism’s dependence on the ontological exclusion of the Indian to social death. The colonial traces of your philosophy replicate civil society’s antagonistic structure of violence.
Byrd, 2011 (Jodi,  The Transit of Empire, Assistant Professor of American Indian Studies and English at the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign. – Chickasaw)
On the threshold, then, of "the necessity with the aleatory, chaos
AND
sovereignty as a source of violence, remedy, memory, and grievability.
Your theory’s knowledge production maintains the structural antagonism of civil society through the parallax gaps that form a cacophony of colonialist logics. Its eradication of indigeneity dooms your epistemology and creates the stage for colonial expansion globally.
Byrd, 2011 (Jodi,  The Transit of Empire, Assistant Professor of American Indian Studies and English at the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign. – Chickasaw)
’This chapter considers the representational logics at work in Shakespeare’s The Tempest to explore how
AND
en scene of U.S. neocolonialism and imperialism around the world.
Your epistemology’s prior ontological exclusion of the Indian ’Savage’ is the clearing that locks western civil society into a structural antagonism of genocide. This turns all attempts at transformative politics.
Wilderson 2009 (Frank, Red, White, and Black: Cinema and the Structure of U.S. Antagonisms, p. 141-142)
Well over twenty thousand Westerns and frontier films have been shot and released since the
AND
as I have indicated "transition" is merely a euphemism for disavowal).
Thus, our alternative to reject the affirmative’s proposal in favor of a politics aimed at the decolonization of North America. Politics invariably requires the establishment of priorities – ours should be this: First Priority to First Americans. Only dismantling the United States all together liberates Native America and us all from the grip of its imperial chokehold.
Churchill 96 (Ward, Codirector of The Colorado Chapter of The American Indian Movement, Former Professor of Ethnic Studies at The University of Colorado/Boulder, "I Am Indigenist, from a Native Son Pgs -89-94")
The question which inevitably arises with regard to indigenous land claims, especially in the
AND
most fundamental of all issues the more¶ sophisticated among them seek to divert

Thus, our alternative to reject the affirmative’s proposal in favor of a politics aimed at the decolonization of North America. Politics invariably requires the establishment of priorities – ours should be this: First Priority to First Americans. Only dismantling the United States all together liberates Native America and us all from the grip of its imperial chokehold.
Churchill 96 (Ward, Codirector of The Colorado Chapter of The American Indian Movement, Former Professor of Ethnic Studies at The University of Colorado/Boulder, "I Am Indigenist, from a Native Son Pgs -89-94")
The question which inevitably arises with regard to indigenous land claims, especially in the
AND
most fundamental of all issues the more¶ sophisticated among them seek to divert

Rejection is the key first step to the prioritization of Indian epistemologies as an intervention to empire. Your genocidal effacement of the radical alterity of the Indian is at the heart of Settler Colonialism’s biopolitical governance over life and death.
Byrd, 2011 (Jodi,  The Transit of Empire, Assistant Professor of American Indian Studies and English at the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign. – Chickasaw)
This book, then, is a journey of sorts, its method mnemonic as
AND
in decolonial, restorative justice tied to land, life, and grievability.
Method is key to epistemology: The epistemological prioritization of decolonialization must come first. Only the alternative avoids the genocidal practices of theory and dismantles the structures of Settler Colonialism.
Byrd, 2011 (Jodi, The Transit of Empire, Assistant Professor of American Indian Studies and English at the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign. – Chickasaw)
As Sankaran Krishna illustrates, the problem of postcolonialism for indigenous peoples has real world
AND
our work and research questions reflect the best of our governance and diplomatic tradition

Tournament: Wichita | Round: 5 | Opponent: UTD MV | Judge: Fifelski
Strategic Silence
Churchill 96 (Ward, Codirector of The Colorado Chapter of The American Indian Movement, Former Professor of Ethnic Studies at The University of Colorado/Boulder, "I Am Indigenist, from a Native Son Pgs -89-94") 

Your epistemology is built on stolen land— Your theory effaces and defers the Settler Colonialism of Empire, which ensures the continued genocide of indigenous people.
Byrd, 2011 (Jodi,  The Transit of Empire, Assistant Professor of American Indian Studies and English at the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign. – Chickasaw)
Despite scholars’ acknowledgments of the coterminous processes of imperialism and colonialism located along the axes
AND
is my attempt to consider how and why that might be the case.
The Indian’s absence is the ontological prior through which your epistemology functions. This parallax gap is the imperialist drive behind environmental destruction and world war.
Byrd, 2011 (Jodi,  The Transit of Empire, Assistant Professor of American Indian Studies and English at the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign. – Chickasaw)
To that end, the first chapter interrogates the Indian errant at the heart of
AND
States continues its global wars on terror, the environment, and livability.
Your epistemology’s deferral of colonialism perpetuate the violent collisions and cacophony that make the transit of global empire possible— Your epistemology of oppression ignores Settler Colonialism’s dependence on the ontological exclusion of the Indian to social death. The colonial traces of your philosophy replicate civil society’s antagonistic structure of violence.
Byrd, 2011 (Jodi,  The Transit of Empire, Assistant Professor of American Indian Studies and English at the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign. – Chickasaw)
On the threshold, then, of "the necessity with the aleatory, chaos
AND
sovereignty as a source of violence, remedy, memory, and grievability.
Your theory’s knowledge production maintains the structural antagonism of civil society through the parallax gaps that form a cacophony of colonialist logics. Its eradication of indigeneity dooms your epistemology and creates the stage for colonial expansion globally.
Byrd, 2011 (Jodi,  The Transit of Empire, Assistant Professor of American Indian Studies and English at the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign. – Chickasaw)
’This chapter considers the representational logics at work in Shakespeare’s The Tempest to explore how
AND
en scene of U.S. neocolonialism and imperialism around the world.
Your epistemology’s prior ontological exclusion of the Indian ’Savage’ is the clearing that locks western civil society into a structural antagonism of genocide. This turns all attempts at transformative politics.
Wilderson 2009 (Frank, Red, White, and Black: Cinema and the Structure of U.S. Antagonisms, p. 141-142)
Well over twenty thousand Westerns and frontier films have been shot and released since the
AND
as I have indicated "transition" is merely a euphemism for disavowal).
Thus, our alternative to reject the affirmative’s proposal in favor of a politics aimed at the decolonization of North America. Politics invariably requires the establishment of priorities – ours should be this: First Priority to First Americans. Only dismantling the United States all together liberates Native America and us all from the grip of its imperial chokehold.
Churchill 96 (Ward, Codirector of The Colorado Chapter of The American Indian Movement, Former Professor of Ethnic Studies at The University of Colorado/Boulder, "I Am Indigenist, from a Native Son Pgs -89-94")
The question which inevitably arises with regard to indigenous land claims, especially in the
AND
most fundamental of all issues the more¶ sophisticated among them seek to divert

Thus, our alternative to reject the affirmative’s proposal in favor of a politics aimed at the decolonization of North America. Politics invariably requires the establishment of priorities – ours should be this: First Priority to First Americans. Only dismantling the United States all together liberates Native America and us all from the grip of its imperial chokehold.
Churchill 96 (Ward, Codirector of The Colorado Chapter of The American Indian Movement, Former Professor of Ethnic Studies at The University of Colorado/Boulder, "I Am Indigenist, from a Native Son Pgs -89-94")
The question which inevitably arises with regard to indigenous land claims, especially in the
AND
most fundamental of all issues the more¶ sophisticated among them seek to divert

Rejection is the key first step to the prioritization of Indian epistemologies as an intervention to empire. Your genocidal effacement of the radical alterity of the Indian is at the heart of Settler Colonialism’s biopolitical governance over life and death.
Byrd, 2011 (Jodi,  The Transit of Empire, Assistant Professor of American Indian Studies and English at the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign. – Chickasaw)
This book, then, is a journey of sorts, its method mnemonic as
AND
in decolonial, restorative justice tied to land, life, and grievability.
Method is key to epistemology: The epistemological prioritization of decolonialization must come first. Only the alternative avoids the genocidal practices of theory and dismantles the structures of Settler Colonialism.
Byrd, 2011 (Jodi, The Transit of Empire, Assistant Professor of American Indian Studies and English at the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign. – Chickasaw)
As Sankaran Krishna illustrates, the problem of postcolonialism for indigenous peoples has real world
AND
our work and research questions reflect the best of our governance and diplomatic tradition

Tournament: UNT | Round: 7 | Opponent: Kansas | Judge: Bonnet
Nietzsche

Tournament: UNT | Round: 7 | Opponent: Kansas | Judge: Bonnet
Nietzsche

Tournament: CEDA | Round: 3 | Opponent: Fullerton GR | Judge: Dillard-Knox
Full text of:

http://www.kafka.org/index.php?aid=161

Tournament: UNT | Round: 2 | Opponent: Georgia State FF | Judge: Heidegger
The ability of the executive to create zones where violence is legitimate is based on the sovereign’s ability to exile people from the human community. This, however, is not a crime against their humanity, but an extension of the original exception: the unending war against nonhumans.
The backdrop of civil society is a relationship of total domination of humans over non-human animals. Democratic deliberation can never be progressive for the non-human animal as its existence is premised upon their exclusion. The impact to this relationship is beyond calculation as the cruelty exerted is beyond description.
Wadiwel 9 Dinesh, Adj researcher at Hawke Research Institute for Sustainable Societies Social Policy Research Group, “The War Against Animals: Domination, Law and Sovereignty” Griffith Law Review 18.2
How might we imagine friendship … in a much more significant way. 

Politics is dependent upon a double disavowal of animality – banning nonhumans from participation and separating political life from biological life and defining humanity as the former. Traditional politics can only function as interest convergence on behalf of humans, parasitic on the lives of nonhumans whose suffering provides the ground for human existence. The paradoxical task is to a radical democratization, but one that rejects the coordinates of any existing political structure. We should not include nonhuman animals, but abolish humanity.
Wadiwel 8 Dinesh, Adj researcher at Hawke Research Institute for Sustainable Societies Social Policy Research Group “Three Fragments from a Biopolitical History of Animals: Questions of Body, Soul, and the Body Politic in Homer, Plato, and Aristotle” Journal for Critical Animal Studies, 6.1
Not only does … anatomically “human” or “animal.” 

Use the ballot to affirm that we are in a war zone. Nonhuman animals can make demands on us, but a prerequisite to true engagement is a laying down of arms, a negation of human sovereignty that opens up the space for animal sovereignties. This ruptures the Western tradition’s logic of exception – the failure to prioritize animal sovereignty as a new means of politics means deliberation will always be violent.
Wadiwel 9 Dinesh, Adj researcher at Hawke Research Institute for Sustainable Societies Social Policy Research Group, “The War Against Animals: Domination, Law and Sovereignty” Griffith Law Review 18.2
Sovereignty has the power … to a fundamental dehumanisation

Tournament: UTD | Round: 5 | Opponent: UTSA CR | Judge: N Scott
Bell and Russell 2K (Anne C. by graduate students in the Faculty of Environmental Studies, York University and Constance L. a graduate student at the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto, Beyond Human, Beyond Words: Anthropocentrism, Critical Pedagogy, and the Poststructuralist Turn, http://www.csse-scee.ca/CJE/Articles/FullText/CJE25-3/CJE25-3-bell.pdf)//RSW

For this reason…other social injustices. 

Inclusion Link
Shimakawa 2004
(Karen, Ph.D, Chair and associate professor of performance studies UCD, “The Things We Share: Ethnic Performativity and Whatever Being” Journal of Speculative Philosophy 18.2)  JTC

Elsewhere I've suggested …  (67, emphasis in original). ¶ 

2nc extension Shimakawa
Edkins and Pin-Fat 05.
 Jenny Edkins, professor of international politics at Prifysgol Aberystwyth University (in Wales) and Veronique Pin-Fat, senior lecturer in politics at Manchester Universit, “Through the Wire: Relations of Power and Relations of Violence,” Millennium - Journal of International Studies 2005 34: pg. 14 JTC

One potential form … sacri or bare life.

Doer of politics key
Danta and Vardoulakis ‘08
Chris, Dimitris SubStance, Issue 117 (Volume 37, Number 3), 2008, pp. 3-6 JTC

There is an … protocols of the

Alt – negate the human
Wadiwel 2009
Dinesh, Adj researcher at Hawke Research Institute for Sustainable Societies Social Policy Research Group, “The War Against Animals: Domination, Law and Sovereignty” Griffith Law Review 18.2 JTC

Humans¶ sit in …. a fundamental dehumanisation 

Sovereignty’s Power is not derived from the political sphere, but from the zone the concentration camp occupies. Opposition must occur on that front to pose a challenge to sovereignty.
Wadiwel ‘02
Dinesh, PhD University of Sydney  “Cows and Sovereignty: Biopower and Animal Life” Borderlands E-Journal Vol. 1, 2002, http://www.borderlandsejournal.au.net JTC

6. It is this … and nothing else. 

Protection contracts are bad—It is a hegemonic thought which maintains exclusion.
Domanska 2010
Ewa, Professor of Anthropology, Stanford “Beyond Anthropocentrism in Historical Studies” http://www.nnet.gr/historein/historeinfiles/histvolumes/hist10/historein10-domanska.pdf JTC

Today’s prevailing approach … with the species?

a2 privilege
Best, No Date
Dr. Steve Best, Chairman of philosophy at UT-EP, “The Killing Fields of South Africa: Eco-Wars, Species Apartheid, and Total Liberation” http://www.drstevebest.org/TheKillingFields.htm JTC

Indeed, we cannot … rather than respect. 27

Zizek evidence about the face of the other

Tournament: UTD | Round: 1 | Opponent: Wyo FT | Judge: J Taylor
Focus the president ensures the aff will only strengthen the will to will, which renders all humans standing reserve. The actions of leaders are merely the effects, not the cause of this process.
MITCHELL 2005 ANDREW J. MITCHELL Associate Professor of Philosophy @ Emory "HEIDEGGER AND TERRORISM" Research in Phenomenology, 35 p 188-90
The will that dominates the modern era is personal, even if, as is
AND
political designations and are each¶ outmoded today. The leaders are slaves.
?
The plan frames targeted killing as a juridical problem to be regulated rather than a normative problem to be ruled on – The aff asks the wrong question: it’s not how should we use targeted killing, but should we use targeted killing at all. Disrupting the law’s normative power is critical to solve
Krasmann 12 (Susanne, prof. Dr, Institute for Criminological Research, University of Hamburg, "Targeted Killing and Its Law: On a Mutually Constitutive Relationship," Leiden Journal of International Law (2012), 25, pg. 678)
The legal debate on targeted killing, particularly that referring to the US practice,
AND
threats and security, and in the dispute about targeted killing operations’ legality.¶
?
Devastation Outweighs Extinction

Devastation is the end result of the will that renders all beings as exchangeable standing reserve. The world becomes an unworld devoid of life and full of terror. Extinction would be a respite from this condition.
MITCHELL 2005 ANDREW J. MITCHELL Associate Professor of Philosophy @ Emory "HEIDEGGER AND TERRORISM" Research in Phenomenology, 35 p 206-207
Devastation (Verwüstung) is the process by which the world becomes a desert (
AND
, being itself is what terrorizes.¶ Terror is the threat of being.
?
Alt Do Nothing

The alt is to do nothing in the instance of the aff. This allows being to rest and short-circuits the will, which can only devastate the earth.
MITCHELL 2005 ANDREW J. MITCHELL Associate Professor of Philosophy @ Emory "HEIDEGGER AND TERRORISM" Research in Phenomenology, 35 p 211-213
The loss of national differences is accordant with the advent of terrorism, since terrorism
AND
There is no security; this¶ is what we have to preserve.