General Actions:
Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Video | Edit/Delete |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D8ndtqualifier | 2 | Binghamton Herrera-Cepin | Opperman, Strange |
| ||||
D8ndtqualifier | 7 | Cornell Huang-Powers | Hall, Johnson |
| ||||
Texas | 2 | Nevada Las Vegas Rodriguez-Velto | Parker |
|
Tournament | Round | Report |
---|
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Entry | Date |
---|---|
1ac bifoTournament: D8ndtqualifier | Round: 7 | Opponent: Cornell Huang-Powers | Judge: Hall, Johnson Endless fox news and cnn ticker warnings about the threats to our infrastructure, energy web, harbors, bank accounts, and personal information all drive a communal anxiety. This discourse of fear collapses the present into the future—where we live just to survive future attacks. It’s a flat world of meaningless statistics and pop ups where everything is vacuous—and it is within this vacuous medium that predictions of cyber terrorism attempt to interrupt our everyday routine—to make us feel danger—feel anything—in the end we are left without sensibility, sensuality, eroticism, or affect—what we need is a radical pedagogy that interrupts the 24 hour news feed and reclaims representations, politics, and meaning. Inundated by the homeopathic doses of violence of the daily news and yahoo updates—we live a life pacified of violence—we’re reminded of the ominous threat of nuclear violence, of riots in the streets of Ukraine and Venezuela, of serial killers—all spectacular violence. This strategy of media serves to make us feel safe at home—this reveals the dual relationship of security and violence—that what we deeply fear is the reality of the fragility of life—that at any moment we are subject to an unexpected death. In the end we are left with depression, with the inability to create meaning through interaction with a community—our lives are meaningless. It’s the constant violence—action movies without dialogue, two word impact—its Mr. Freeze and Terminator three debate—extinction and war serve as our access to meaning—the scenarios and uniqueness changes but nothing ever happens. The inability to differentiate the real world from fantasy creates a desire for truth and meaning—we have a choice—either we turn to the razor, rope, and gun or we choose the revolt against the representations of the spectacle. Oliver 2007 (Kelly. W. Alton Jones Chair in Philosophy at Vanderbilt University. Women as Weapons of War: Iraq, Sex, and the Media pg.84-88 The spirit of dance may be steeped in fear but the reaction is important—instead of reacting like chicken little, huddling inside our bunkers, preparing our castles from waves of immigrants and cyber war—we ought revolt. We challenge the executive to stop engaging in cyber war—to stop the endless justification for violence. Our revolt realizes that while we may die—we ought not believe that the world is going to end because of the Internet. Better to dance on rooftops that fear the internet bomb. Instead of quickly reacting in panic to doomsdays scenarios that cut off meaning from the body—we redirect the drives of depression and anxiety towards productive artistry—by interpreting the signs of the media—we reclaims space for the body in politics and creative meaning making. Vote affirmative to revolt against the president’s ability to wage cyberwarfare. Oliver 2k4 Kelly. W. Alton Jones Chair in Philosophy at Vanderbilt University. Colonization of Psychic Space: A Psychoanalytic Social Theory of Oppression pg.147-50 | 2/27/14 |
1ac korematsuTournament: D8ndtqualifier | Round: 2 | Opponent: Binghamton Herrera-Cepin | Judge: Opperman, Strange The internment cases---including Korematsu---are flawed and racist institutional stances on indefinite detention---Korematsu ruled the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II constitutional The Korematsu-era cases present a flawed institutional and racist stance on indefinite detention---it was not based on military necessity, only racial discrimination The internment cases are flawed and racist institutional stances on indefinite detention---Korematsu ruled the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II constitutional---the precedent massively expands exec authority and makes future internment of minority groups such as Arabs and Muslims likely Ending the precedent is vital to prevent history from repeating itself While Korematsu should be repudiated for its racist underpinnings, a singular focus on explicit discrimination is insufficient. Korematsu was not decided along racial lines, which illustrates how presidential war powers justification serves as a vector for opression. Furthermore, Bush lawyers revived Korematsu and concurrant military cases to justify the war on terror, and insufficient exposure to this historical legacy prevented effective legal opposition. Resistance to presidential war powers must begin with an investigation and repudiation of the “Korematsu era”. This will faciliate meaningful restraints on the executive and reclaim the narrative of war on terror legality. INTRODUCTION This was the culmination of racism against Asian Americans in the United States The aff is a holistic challenge to racism that recognizes the connections between different policies and how racism affects multiple minority groups The ongoing legacy of the Korematsu Era war powers authority cases should be repudiated and ended. We have a moral obligation to advocate for effective remedies to injustices like Korematsu---the aff is not the ONLY starting point, but is ONE effective starting point to challenge executive abuses of power The federal judiciary should repudiate the Internment Cases officially---prevents devastating social and political conflicts | 2/27/14 |
contact infoTournament: Texas | Round: 2 | Opponent: Nevada Las Vegas Rodriguez-Velto | Judge: Parker | 2/11/14 |
virilio 1acTournament: Texas | Round: 2 | Opponent: Nevada Las Vegas Rodriguez-Velto | Judge: Parker Acceleration imbues the executive with increased authority to thwart the legitimate deliberative legislative process at his whim, rendering civic life obsolete by the instability of time itself. Scheuerman 1 (William E. Scheuerman, professor of political science at the University of Minnesota. “Liberal Democracy and the Empire of Speed.” Polity, Vol. 34, No. 1 (Autumn, 2001), pp. 41-67 As speed colonized the elastic democratic relationship between the people and their representatives it is clear unilateral executive power to destroy life itself without legislative constraint can never be contained by anyone other than the absolute sovereign himself. Grove 8 (jairus, phd in ir at jhopkins, asst professor at u of hawaii, Schmitt’s Sovereign ‘Exception’, the American Constitution, and Presidential Nuclear Power) Acceleration of technology has created instantaneous decision making whereby automatons embodying our obsession to harness speed replace life altogether. Adams 3 (Jason Adams, M.A. candidate in political science at Simon Fraser University, 2003, “Popular Defense in the Empire of Speed: Paul Virilio and the Phenomenology of the Political Body,” Thesis, http://www.academia.edu/attachments/2058093/download_file Cyberwar is the apotheosis of cybernetic colonialism, our infatuation with acceleration and quest for control pushes us towards the imminent launch of the information bomb as the locus of our deterrent is transferred from the atom to the electron, fulfilling our dreams of instantaneous and absolute response. With the culmination of pure war comes the specter of the integral accident: global in scope and general in nature Virilio 6 (Paul Virilio. 2006. The Information Bomb. pp. 131-145) The thesis of emergent causality necessitates our refusal of the unitary executive. The complexity of politics is beyond a sole decision maker, to create a despot is go all in on an unwinnable hand Campbell et al 2007David Campbell: Int’l boundaries Research, Geography Department, Durham U: with Stuart Elden and Stephen Graham LuizaBialasiewisz: Department of Geography at Royal Holloway U of London, and Alex Jeffrey from the School of Geography at the U of Newcastle, “Performing security: The imaginative geographies of current US strategy” pg on bottom Methodologically this approach requires an alternative … it only if it does not spawn new persona to replace them. Vote affirmative to endorse restrictions on the unitary executive over cyber warfare. Liberalism closes off deliberation because it’s afraid where true democracy will take us, and instead invests in the executive the authority to narrate the present into the future. The role of the ballot is endorsement of agonistic respect; voting aff opens debate to uncertainty by opening up dissonant politics of pluralization for only a pluralizing democracy can deal with the dangers of dogmatism and fundamentalism Connolly 95William, Professor of Political Science at John Hopkins, The Ethos of Pluralization, pg at bottom Agonistic respect opens the possibility of contestation which is a prerequisite for allowing a deep respect to arise between interacters. Voting aff isn’t easy – it is hard to have faith that others will reciprocate our agonistic respect but because the affirmative method treats positions of faith and morality of others as contestable and worthy by challenging dogmatic impositions of difference we uniquely initiate the discourse for that mutual respect. Our methodology allows individuals to cultivate the capacity for critical responsiveness because the “arts of the self” is a micropolitical resistance to the colonization of speed into politics so although Bobby and I may not control any lever of power, and we are certainly not the USFG; our methodology of a constant identity-in-difference begins the process of dismantling the dominant secularist ideologies. The affirmative doesn’t advocate bringing the speed of politics to a halt through aimlessly pondering rather we implant agonism in democratic governance to invoke pluralistic resistance to the velocity of secularist totalitarianism. The liberal narrative of speed sacrifices deliberation for speed, constructing slowness as failure and gifting the executive access to instantaneous action in order to justify unethical and bellicose intervention. To reclaim politics, a refusal of the unilateral executive restores faith in democracy. | 2/11/14 |
Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
---|
Air Force
Amherst
Appalachian State
Arizona State
Army
Augustana
Bard
Baylor
Binghamton
Boston College
Capital
CSU Long Beach
CSU Northridge
CSU Sacramento
CUNY
Cal Berkeley
Cal Lutheran
Cal Poly SLO
Case Western
Central Florida
Central Oklahoma
Chico
Clarion
Columbia
Concordia
Cornell
Dartmouth
Denver
Drexel-Swarthmore
ENMU
East Los Angeles College
Eastern Washington
Emory
Emporia
Fayetteville State
Florida
Florida Int'l
Florida State
Fordham
Fresno State
Fullerton
Gainesville State
George Mason
George Washington
Georgetown
Georgia
Georgia State
Georgia Tech
Gonzaga
Harvard
Houston
Idaho State
Illinois
Illinois State
Indiana
Iowa
Irvine/SFSU
James Madison
John Carroll
Johns Hopkins
Johnson County CC
KCKCC
Kansas
Kansas State
Kentucky
LA City College
Lakeland
Lewis-Clark State College
Liberty
Lindenwood
Los Rios
Louisville
Loyola
Macalester
Marist
Mary Washington
Mercer
Methodist
Miami FL
Miami OH
Michigan
Michigan State
Minnesota
Mission
Missouri State
NYU
Navy
New School
North Texas
Northern Iowa
Northwestern
Notre Dame
Ohio Wesleyan
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pepperdine
Piedmont
Pittsburgh
Portland State
Princeton
Puget Sound
Redlands
Richmond
Rochester
Rutgers
Samford
San Diego State
San Francisco State
Santa Clara
South Florida St Pete
Southern Methodist
Southwestern
Stanford
Texas State
Texas-Austin
Texas-Dallas
Texas-San Antonio
Texas-Tyler
Towson
Trinity
U Chicago
UCLA
UDC-CC
UMKC
UNLV
USC
Utah
Vanderbilt
Vermont
Virginia Tech
Wake Forest
Wash U (St. Louis)
Washburn
Washington
Wayne State
Weber
West Georgia
West Virginia
Western Connecticut
Whitman
Wichita State
Wisconsin Oshkosh
Wyoming