General Actions:
Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Video | Edit/Delete |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Binghamton | 1 | c | c |
| ||||
Binghamton | 1 | c | c |
| ||||
Binghamton | 1 | c | c |
| ||||
Binghamton | 1 | c | c |
| ||||
Binghamton | 1 | c | c |
| ||||
Binghamton | 1 | c | c |
| ||||
Binghamton | 1 | c | c |
| ||||
Urbradsmith | 2 | Binghamton Bleyle-Sehgal | Diamond |
| ||||
Urbradsmith | 2 | Binghamton Bleyle-Sehgal | Diamond |
|
Tournament | Round | Report |
---|
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Entry | Date |
---|---|
ssp affTournament: Binghamton | Round: 1 | Opponent: c | Judge: c Contention One: SSP Bush transformed the use of state secrets privilege (SSP for short) CCR in 13 {Center for Constitutional Rights Stop the Abuse of the State Secrets Privilege The state secrets privilege … accountability for criminal behavior. SSP insures war powers are unrestricted. Currently, they act with impunity, treating secrecy as sacrosanct and are too tempted to restraint themselves. The Supreme Court hasn’t reviewed SSP in a half century. Gostola in 12 {Kevin-author who publishes his writing regularly to OpEdNews and Open Salon Gosztola August 20, 2012 The State Secrets Privilege: A Horrendous Creation of the Judiciary http://dissenter.firedoglake.com/2012/08/20/the-state-secrets-privilege-a-horrendous-creation-of-the-judiciary/} Even when the information is no longer “secret”, the government attempts to use SSP. Jeppesen proves ACLU 10 {SLAMMING THE COURTHOUSE DOORS Denial of Access to Justice and Remedy in America Dec http://www.aclu.org/files/assets/HRP_UPRsubmission_annex.pdf p16} Thus the Plan: The Supreme Court should restrict presidential war powers in cases of indefinite detention by restricting the State Secrets privilege. As in all judicial matters, the Court may draw from legal precedent, previously-used government guidelines and lower court decisions in formulating grounds for its decision and the Court may issue dictum suggesting clarification by the lower courts and/or Congress. Advantage One: Security SSP represent a cornerstone of the secrecy matrix. It evolved from evidentiary dismissal to case dismissals despite Congressional reform attempts. 125 recent cases have invoked it CGS in 13 {Collaboration on Government Secrecy ("CGS") http://www.wcl.american.edu/lawandgov/cgs/about.cfm#ssp} Dean 11 Robert-Associate Professor of History at Eastern Washington University Introduction: Cultures of Secrecy in Postwar America, the journal for the society of historians of foreign relations, Issue Diplomatic History, Volume 35, Issue 4, pages 611–613, September 2011 State secrecy creates an inevitable tension … to three talented scholars to develop this theme in relation to¶ their own historical concerns. Secrets become the goal in and of themselves. The innovation of the term “state secret” brings an abrupt end to public discourse and allows the state to create new threats. Masco 2 (Joseph – Prof Anthropology @ U Chicago; “Lie Detectors: On Secrets and Hypersecurity in Los Alamos”; Public Culture 14.3 (2002) 441-467) It is important, therefore, to recognize the … powerfully protected, nuclear secret. The call to securitize always implies an enemy: against the sacred population in need of salvation is placed an unstable other who must be resisted at all costs. The only possible result is annihilation. Campbell, 1998. David, professor of international politics at the University of Newcastle. Writing Security, 1998. (199 – 202) Security and subjectivity are …— and foreign policy/Foreign Policy are all a part. Advantage Two: The War Machine State Secrets Privilege Legitimates State Violence, Hides The Crimes of the Cultural War Machine Which Promotes Dehumanization, Renders Populations Disposable, and the Torture of Children. Justice is slipping away. Affirmation saves it. Giroux 10 {Henry A. Tortured Memories and the Culture of War Nov 2009 excerpt from "Hearts of Darkness: Torturing Children in the War on Terror" http://www.truth-out.org/archive/item/86623:tortured-memories-and-the-culture-of-war} The War Machine robs of us our authenticity; rejecting the State Secrets Privilege allows for the recapture of our individuality through breaking the norms of War Culture. Charles Guignon 2008(University of South Florida). Authenticity. Philosophy Compass(March 2008) Volume 3, Issue 2, Pp 226-290. We just noted that the ideal of authenticity first … take responsibility for our own lives. Thus autonomy is the source of authenticity in order to legitimize our personhood we need to break out from the cultural norm of war in order and the biases it instills in our decision making. Our autonomy will guide us to break down the discourse of the War Machine and no longer be complicit in the politically paralyzing secrets regime. A THOUSAND PLATEAUS Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Gilles Deleuze. Felix Guattari. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis. AND our Ontology comes first we must accept the responsibility to action in order to break the secrets regime. Korous 97 (George, Yale Law Graduate, Copeland Winner, Become What You Are , p. 1-3) Through controlling our decisions and our interactions with the world we can shape our ontological Being as we prefer. This self-awareness of our Being breaks us free as we are no longer dependent on the normalized culture of war and instead are free to choose for ourselves. Externalization requires liberation from domination Contention Two: Solvency Confining states secrets privilege opens the door to multiple remedies with longstanding histories of successful balancing of national security and litigant rights Frost and Florence in 8 {Amanda-Assoc Prof of Law, American Univ Wash College of Law. Reforming the State Secrets Privilege ACS Issue Brief September Justin-Associate, O’Melveny and Myers, LLP; Nonresident Fellow, Georgetown Center on National Security and the Law. Issue brief drawn in part from Amanda Frost, The State Secrets Privilege and Separation of Powers, 75 FORDHAM L REV. 1931 (2007) http://www.acslaw.org/files/Frost20FINAL.pdf P13} Such cases were not … not just to those harmed by them, but to all who might be in the future. The choice isn’t a binary. Confining opens up lots of ways to avoid any and all disadvantages Frost and Florence in 8 {Amanda-Assoc Prof of Law, American Unive Washington College of Law. Reforming the State Secrets Privilege ACS Issue Brief September Justin-Associate, O’Melveny and Myers, LLP; Nonresident Fellow, Georgetown Center on National Security and the Law. Issue brief drawn in part from Amanda Frost, The State Secrets Privilege and Separation of Powers, 75 FORDHAM L REV. 1931 (2007) http://www.acslaw.org/files/Frost20FINAL.pdf P20} Fortunately, there is no need to … both the interests of litigants and secret national security information Congress and the Courts must solve this together Fisher, 7 {Louis Specialist in Constitutional Law, Law Library, Library of Congress REFORMING THE STATE SECRETS PRIVILEGE Executive Summary pii May 31 http://www.constitutionproject.org/pdf/Reforming_the_State_Secrets_Privilege_Statement.pdf} This report calls on judges to … accountability for executive actions. ALL KNOWLEDGE COMES FROM EXPERIENCE MEANING WE HAVE THE CAPACITY TO GARNER NEW KNOWLEDGE THROUGH OUR INTERACTIONS AND DESTROY BAD HABITS. AND CODIFIED ETHICS DEFERS RESPONSIBILITY OF MORAL ACTORS TO MORAL CODES, WHICH MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE FOR MORALITY TO ASCRIBE STATUS TO INDIVIDUALS DENYING CITIZENS ANY TYPE OF MORAL DECISION MAKING BECAUSE WITHOUT A CHOICE THE ACTOR DOESN’T HAVE TO ENGAGE IN ANY SORT OF MORAL THOUGHT PROCESS WHEN CARRYING OUT THE ACTION. UNDER A CODIFIED ETHIC INDIVIDUALS CANNOT EXPRESS THEIR TRUE MORALITY. Bauman 95, ZygmuntProfessor of Sociology at University of Leeds. Postmodern Ethics. Malden: Blackwell, 1995. Print. | 9/27/13 |
virilio 1acTournament: Urbradsmith | Round: 2 | Opponent: Binghamton Bleyle-Sehgal | Judge: Diamond the power of the unitary executive is the final accident – the collapse of technology and the world as we know it. the moment of decision is now colonized by the speed of politics. We have replaced the executive with technological control, letting go of human interactions Cyberwar is an inevitable result of ceding of autonomy, creates the worse form of destruction. Vote affirmative to endorse restrictions on the unitary executive over cyber warfare. Liberalism closes off deliberation because it’s afraid where true democracy will take us, instead investing the executive with the authority to narrate the present into the future. Vote aff to open debate to futurity. The unitary executive is unacceptable – only a pluralizing democracy can deal with the dangers of dogmatism and fundamentalism The thesis of emergent causality necessitates that our refusal of the unitary executive. The complexity of politics is beyond a sole decision maker, to create a despot is go all in on an unwinnable hand Methodologically this approach requires an alternative … new persona to replace them. Aimlessly pondering is unproductive. The hail of the affirmative is to create a positive method for democratic governance, sheltered from the speed of modern politics. Voting aff endorses a radical embrace of that uncertainty. To reclaim politics, a refusal of the unilateral executive restores faith in democracy The transfer of power to the executive was done out of fear; fear of the future, fear of inaction, and fear of death. This fear is now informational, tied to cyberspace and creating policies of irrationality and terror. Find the courage to reject the dominate narrative of speed. | 10/12/13 |
Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
---|
Air Force
Amherst
Appalachian State
Arizona State
Army
Augustana
Bard
Baylor
Binghamton
Boston College
Capital
CSU Long Beach
CSU Northridge
CSU Sacramento
CUNY
Cal Berkeley
Cal Lutheran
Cal Poly SLO
Case Western
Central Florida
Central Oklahoma
Chico
Clarion
Columbia
Concordia
Cornell
Dartmouth
Denver
Drexel-Swarthmore
ENMU
East Los Angeles College
Eastern Washington
Emory
Emporia
Fayetteville State
Florida
Florida Int'l
Florida State
Fordham
Fresno State
Fullerton
Gainesville State
George Mason
George Washington
Georgetown
Georgia
Georgia State
Georgia Tech
Gonzaga
Harvard
Houston
Idaho State
Illinois
Illinois State
Indiana
Iowa
Irvine/SFSU
James Madison
John Carroll
Johns Hopkins
Johnson County CC
KCKCC
Kansas
Kansas State
Kentucky
LA City College
Lakeland
Lewis-Clark State College
Liberty
Lindenwood
Los Rios
Louisville
Loyola
Macalester
Marist
Mary Washington
Mercer
Methodist
Miami FL
Miami OH
Michigan
Michigan State
Minnesota
Mission
Missouri State
NYU
Navy
New School
North Texas
Northern Iowa
Northwestern
Notre Dame
Ohio Wesleyan
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pepperdine
Piedmont
Pittsburgh
Portland State
Princeton
Puget Sound
Redlands
Richmond
Rochester
Rutgers
Samford
San Diego State
San Francisco State
Santa Clara
South Florida St Pete
Southern Methodist
Southwestern
Stanford
Texas State
Texas-Austin
Texas-Dallas
Texas-San Antonio
Texas-Tyler
Towson
Trinity
U Chicago
UCLA
UDC-CC
UMKC
UNLV
USC
Utah
Vanderbilt
Vermont
Virginia Tech
Wake Forest
Wash U (St. Louis)
Washburn
Washington
Wayne State
Weber
West Georgia
West Virginia
Western Connecticut
Whitman
Wichita State
Wisconsin Oshkosh
Wyoming