1NC- Chrysler Court Capital DA Schmitt K T restrict = prohibit drone shift DA congress CP flex turns
2nr- schmitt K
KY
5
Opponent: Liberty CC | Judge: Herndon
1NC Pres Flex Iran DA DC Politics Drone Shift ICC CP 2NR Politics
KY
8
Opponent: JMU CP | Judge: Bellon
1NC DC Politics Death Cult K T-immigrants substantial XO CP heg bad 2NR Death Cult K
UCO
1
Opponent: Kansas HW | Judge: Munday
The United States federal government should restrict the war powers authority of the President of the United States to assert on behalf of the United States immunity from judicial review through a statutory cause of action allowing civil suits brought against the United States by those unlawfully injured by indefinite detention 1 EU Intel Sharing 2 Deference Adv v Congress CP Court Politics Drone Shift DA Topicality - ProhibitArea (2NR)
UMKC
2
Opponent: Emporia HS | Judge: Paul Johnson
1AC - Judicial restrictions on indefinite detention
1NC Budget deal DA Congress Appropriations CP Fem IR K Heg Bad Case
2NC Budget DA Heg Bad Case
1NR K
2NR K
UMKC
8
Opponent: UNT FO | Judge: Feldman
1NC T "judicial" Exec CP Con ConAmendment CP Debt Ceiling Politics Pres Powers DA on case
2NR Pres Powers DA and Exec CP
UMKC
6
Opponent: USC HS | Judge: Koehle
1NC Exec CP Syria Politics Hollow Hope K Drone Shift DA 2NR Hollow Hope K
UMKC
4
Opponent: UNLV JS | Judge: Osborn
2nr Pres Powers DA
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Cites
Entry
Date
KY RD 1
Tournament: KY | Round: 1 | Opponent: OU CL | Judge: Reynolds 1AC
Pouya and I wish to use this moment to recognize our own privilege and, in the context of that privilege, call for the restriction of the President of the United States’ war powers authority to indefinitely detain. In an article titled “The Continuing US War on the Darker Skinned” on August 6th of this year, Adam Hudson explained (The Continuing US War on the Darker AND By Adam Hudson, Truthout | News Analysis) The notorious US military base and penal colony AND in independent black journalistic outlets than corporate media.
This is ethically unacceptable--- failure to end this practice dooms dozens of people to perpetual detention Amnesty 2013 (Amnesty International, May 2013, “USA¶ ‘I HAVE NO REASON TO ¶ BELIEVE THAT I WILL ¶ EVER LEAVE THIS ¶ PRISON ALIVE’¶ INDEFINITE DETENTION AT ¶ GUANTÁNAMO CONTINUES; 100 ¶ DETAINEES ON HUNGER STRIKE,” http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/asset/AMR51/022/2013/en/e480ed9c-db38-4bd3-b660-6943142c4449/amr510222013en.pdf) What will it take to get the US AND and they resort ¶ to such desperate measures.” Detainees are routinely subjected to physical and psychological violence Moazzam Begg 2013 (Moazzam Begg, former Gitmo detainee, Interviewed by Global News network RT, FORMER DETAINEE OF GUANTANAMO “‘Everybody in Guantanamo has been tortured or abused’ - former detainee” July 6th http://rt.com/op-edge/gitmo-strike-torture-inmate-724/) “I was subjected to the sounds of AND or trial in any legal, normative system.
Indefinite detention causes psychological trauma Cheyette 2011 (Cara M. Cheyette, JD, MPH, “Punishment Before Justice: Indefinite Detention in the US,” Physicians for Human Rights, https://s3.amazonaws.com/PHR_Reports/indefinite-detention-june2011.pdf) Individuals deprived of information about when or whether AND pain without ever touching the detainee.46
Indefinite detention is categorically different from other forms of governmental custody Cheyette 2011 (Cara M. Cheyette, JD, MPH, “Punishment Before Justice: Indefinite Detention in the US,” Physicians for Human Rights, https://s3.amazonaws.com/PHR_Reports/indefinite-detention-june2011.pdf) By definition, indefinite detention refers to a AND detainee experiencing his captivity as capricious and arbitrary. State actors have an obligation to restrict indefinite detention authority Steyn 2003 (Johan Steyn, A Lord of Appeal in Ordinary, November 25, 2003, Twenty-Seventh FA Mann Lecture British Institute of International and Comparative Law and Herbert Smith, Lincoln’s Inn Old Hall, http://www.pegc.us/archive/Articles/Steyn_London_20031125.pdf) The most powerful democracy is detaining hundreds of AND institutions from close scrutiny and¶ accountability”.7 Discursive reference to the state doesn’t legitimize it and is tactically necessary Frost 1996 (Mervyn Frost, Professor at the University of Kent, “Ethics In International Relations A Constitutive Theory,” pp. 90-91) A first objection which seems inherent in Donelan's AND under law, representative government and so on. Critique of the racial state shouldn’t preclude demands that it stop its practices Lipsitz 2004 (George Black Studies @ UC SB “Abolition democracy and global justice” Comparative American Studies 2 (3) p. 271-276) Abstract As new social relations produce new kinds AND
Waxer, 2002; Woods, 1998).
2AC
This avoids the police order of politics as usual – using our privileged status to undo structures of privilege is an essential component of ethical politics – We solve their impact claims and the permutation avoids the links – our strategy of calls for political action on behalf of those marginalized by politics as usual is an act of “sharing” that avoids domination in recognition of equality – a call for action by those with a part in politics for those without allows for critical reflexivity to widen the scope of ethical political action to include additional perspectives
May 7 (Todd, SubStance 36. AND Thought is forthcoming from Edinburgh Press in 2008.) How shall we characterize what is proper to AND the pervasive and multifarious dominations of our world.
That internal connection is crucial to political subjectification to overcome the objectified nature of the black body in civil society Jafari S. Allen 2011 “¡Venceremos?: The Erotics of Black Self-making in Cuba” google books For black folks, resistance always takes place AND , reeducate, and raise consciousness toward revolution? The policies and policymakers are the source of the systemic violence you discuss Themba-Nixon 00, Executive Director of The Praxis Project, a nonprofit organization helping communities use media and policy advocacy Makani, July 31, Colorlines, Changing AND Means for Organizing, Vol 3.2) “This is all about policy," a woman complained to me in a recent conversation. "I'm an organizer." The flourish and passion with which she made the distinction said everything. Policy is for wonks, sell-out politicians, and ivory-tower eggheads. Organizing is what real, grassroots people do. Common as it may be, this distinction doesn't bear out in the real world. Policy is more than law. It is any written agreement (formal or informal) that specifies how an institution, governing body, or community will address shared problems or attain shared goals. It spells out the terms and the consequences of these agreements and is the codification of the body's values-as represented by those present in the policymaking process. Given who's usually present, most policies reflect the political agenda of powerful elites. Yet, policy can be a force for change-especially when we bring our base and community organizing into the process. In essence, policies are the codification of power relationships and resource allocation. Policies are the rules of the world we live in. Changing the world means changing the rules. So, if organizing is about changing the rules and building power, how can organizing be separated from policies? Can we really speak truth to power, fight the right, stop corporate abuses, or win racial justice without contesting the rules and the rulers, the policies and the policymakers? The answer is no-and double no for people of color. Today, racism subtly dominates nearly every aspect of policymaking. From ballot propositions to city funding priorities, policy is increasingly about the control, de-funding, and disfranchisement of communities of color. Take the public conversation about welfare reform, for example. Most of us know it isn't really about putting people to work. The right's message was framed around racial stereotypes of lazy, cheating "welfare queens" whose poverty was "cultural." But the new welfare policy was about moving billions of dollars in individual cash payments and direct services from welfare recipients to other, more powerful, social actors. Many of us were too busy to tune into the welfare policy drama in Washington, only to find it washed up right on our doorsteps. Our members are suffering from workfare policies, new regulations, and cutoffs. Families who were barely getting by under the old rules are being pushed over the edge by the new policies. Policy doesn't get more relevant than this. And so we got involved in policy-as defense. Yet we have to do more than block their punches. We have to start the fight with initiatives of our own. Those who do are finding offense a bit more fun than defense alone. Living wage ordinances, youth development initiatives, even gun control and alcohol and tobacco policies are finding their way onto the public agenda, thanks to focused community organizing that leverages power for community-driven initiatives. - Over 600 local policies have been passed to regulate the tobacco industry. Local coalitions have taken the lead by writing ordinances that address local problems and organizing broad support for them. - Nearly 100 gun control and violence prevention policies have been enacted since 1991. - Milwaukee, Boston, and Oakland are among the cities that have passed living wage ordinances: local laws that guarantee higher than minimum wages for workers, usually set as the minimum needed to keep a family of four above poverty. These are just a few of the examples that demonstrate how organizing for local policy advocacy has made inroads in areas where positive national policy had been stalled by conservatives. Increasingly, the local policy arena is where the action is and where activists are finding success. Of course, corporate interests-which are usually the target of these policies-are gearing up in defense. Tactics include front groups, economic pressure, and the tried and true: cold, hard cash. Despite these barriers, grassroots organizing can be very effective at the smaller scale of local politics. At the local level, we have greater access to elected officials and officials have a greater reliance on their constituents for reelection. For example, getting 400 people to show up at city hall in just about any city in the U.S. is quite impressive. On the other hand, 400 people at the state house or the Congress would have a less significant impact. Add to that the fact that all 400 people at city hall are usually constituents, and the impact is even greater. Recent trends in government underscore the importance of local policy. Congress has enacted a series of measures devolving significant power to state and local government. Welfare, health care, and the regulation of food and drinking water safety are among the areas where states and localities now have greater rule. Devolution has some negative consequences to be sure. History has taught us that, for social services and civil rights in particular, the lack of clear federal standards and mechanisms for accountability lead to uneven enforcement and even discriminatory implementation of policies. Still, there are real opportunities for advancing progressive initiatives in this more localized environment. Greater local control can mean greater community power to shape and implement important social policies that were heretofore out of reach. To do so will require careful attention to the mechanics of local policymaking and a clear blueprint of what we stand for. Much of the work of framing what we stand for takes place in the shaping of demands. By getting into the policy arena in a proactive manner, we can take our demands to the next level. Our demands can become law, with real consequences if the agreement is broken. After all the organizing, press work, and effort, a group should leave a decisionmaker with more than a handshake and his or her word. Of course, this work requires a certain amount of interaction with "the suits," as well as struggles with the bureaucracy, the technical language, and the all-too-common resistance by decisionmakers. Still, if it's worth demanding, it's worth having in writing-whether as law, regulation, or internal policy. From ballot initiatives on rent control to laws requiring worker protections, organizers are leveraging their power into written policies that are making a real difference in their communities. Of course, policy work is just one tool in our box.
Perm solves best- Next next level- Situated discourse is a “heteroglossia” not categorizable codes to be switched, turns the K Susan E. Frekko Goucher College Anthropological Quarterly Volume 84, Number 1, Winter 2011 “Containing Castilian in Catalan Talk Radio: Heteroglossia and the Projection of Monoglot Identities” Scholars have called into question the notion of AND 258). Brackets added to clarify original Mutual respect- Both vernaculars have merit, incorporation in educational settings solves mutual respect Jonsberg 2001 (Sara Jonsberg, teaches in the English Department at Montclair State University in New Jersey, “What's a (White) Teacher to Do about Black English?,” The English Journal, Vol. 90, No. 4, pg 51-53) If we are going to celebrate diversity in AND work ¶ of healing misunderstandings about this language.
Our harms outweigh their link to the aff Eckersley 2003 (Robyn Eckersley, Politics at Melbourne, The Green State p. 89-93) Green poststructuralists have likewise sought to deconstruct the AND critical locus on the state can remain productive.
10/12/13
KY RD 3
Tournament: KY | Round: 3 | Opponent: Harvard BN | Judge: Murray 2ac 2AC T “Restriction on Pres WPA” We meet-Indefinite detention is the determination of “enemy combatant” status and the justifications JENNIFER K. ELSEA Congressional Research Service Presidential Studies Quarterly Volume 33, Issue 3, Presidential Authority to Detain “Enemy Combatants”, J.D. Washington College of Law; Article first published online: 12 SEP 2003 President Bush claims the power, as Commander AND authorized the detention of “enemy ¶ combatants.”
“Restrict” is just limit Google Dictionary re•strict ri?strikt/Submit verb 1. put a limit on; keep under control. "some roads may have to be closed at peak times to restrict the number of visitors"
W/M- Constitutional basis is “Improper self-expansion without statutory authority” Landau 12 (ARTICLE: CHEVRON MEETS YOUNGSTOWN: NATIONAL SECURITY AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATE Joseph Landau Associate Professor, Fordham Law School. December, 2012 Boston University Law Review 92 B.U.L. Rev. 1917. Lexis)
Step One Deference to Agency Self AND , and it reinstated the DOL rule. 111 We’re a judicial interpretation of implied statutory limitations on “enemy combatant” status David J. Barron, Professor of Law, Harvard Law School, and Martin S. Lederman, Visiting Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center, 2008, “THE COMMANDER IN CHIEF AT THE LOWEST EBB - FRAMING THE PROBLEM, DOCTRINE, AND ORIGINAL UNDERSTANDING,” Harvard Law Review, January, pp. LN. 4. Judicial Enforcement of Implied Statutory Restrictions AND likely occurrence than war powers scholarship typically assumes.
intel State shift in law enforcement’s key to prevent existential Southeast European attacks SET 9-12 (Experts: Prevention AND /09/12/feature-02) Officials at the Council of the European Union AND their education is the key," he said.
Case-deference
Presumption against authenticity of classified intel now—Precedent solves and spills over now is key Benhalim 10 (The Emerging Law of Detention AND _guantanamo_wittes_chesney.pdf) However significant the admissibility vs. weight debate AND 123 Whether this option proves viable remains unclear.
Exec deference is defunct—precedent has unquestionably shifted to the Courts Landau 12 (ARTICLE: CHEVRON MEETS YOUNGSTOWN: NATIONAL SECURITY AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATE Joseph Landau Associate Professor, Fordham Law School. December, 2012 Boston University Law Review 92 B.U.L. Rev. 1917. Lexis) C. Chevron's Detractors While the Supreme Court AND the judiciary's proper role in foreign relations." 325
No link but we solve—Rulings are light in conclusion but heavy in practice Vladeck 11 (Stephen I., Professor of AND “ARTICLE: THE PASSIVE-AGGRESSIVE VIRTUES”) As al-Kidd suggests, even when AND of enemy combatants. Clearly, they have.
Cong cp Court’s key to successful Congress push Landau 12 (ARTICLE: CHEVRON MEETS YOUNGSTOWN: NATIONAL SECURITY AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATE Joseph Landau Associate Professor, Fordham Law School. December, 2012 Boston University Law Review 92 B.U.L. Rev. 1917. Lexis) While Chevron's advocates have frequently promoted the application AND squarely within, foundational principles of administrative law. Courts DA The plan is DC District Court Madhani 2011 (Aamer Madhani, June 15, 2011, “Lawmakers Sue Obama and Gates Over Libya,” National Journal, http://www.nationaljournal.com/nationalsecurity/lawmakers-sue-obama-and-gates-over-libya-20110615) A bipartisan group of lawmakers has filed a AND respective constitutional processes” of the United States. It’s normal means and shields Supreme Court involvement Tobias 1993 (Carl Tobias, Professor of Law, University of Montana, September 1993, “The D.C. Circuit as a National Court,” University of Miami Law Review, Lexis) Many aspects of the D.C. AND of Americans and have national and international ramifications.
Normal means is end-of-term announcement--- solves the link Mondak 1992 (Jeffery J. Mondak, assistant professor of political science @ the University of Pittsburgh. “Institutional legitimacy, policy legitimacy, and the Supreme Court.” American Politics Quarterly, Vol. 20, No. 4, Lexis) The process described by the political capital hypothesis AND to offset the effects of its controversial actions? Controversial decisions boost capital Ginsburg, 2009 (Tom Ginsburg, professor of law, the University of Chicago Law School, 9 Chi. J. Int'l L. 499, Winter, lexis) In a recent contribution, David Law argues AND -term reputation for generating focal points. 57
Econ collapse doesn’t cause war – prefer our studies Samuel Bazzi (Department of Economics at University of California San Diego) and Christopher Blattman (assistant professor of political science and economics at Yale University) November 2011 “Economic Shocks and Conflict: The (Absence of?) Evidence from Commodity Prices” http://www.chrisblattman.com/documents/research/2011.EconomicShocksAndConflict.pdf?9d7bd4 VI. Discussion and conclusions A. Implications AND for initially significant results than ambiguous ones.20
2AC Drone Shift That’s already triggered the shift—aff solves David Ignatius 10, Washington Post, "Our default is killing terrorists by drone attack. Do you care?", December 2, www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/01/AR2010120104458.html Every war brings its own deformations, but AND , but the moral issues are the same." No link—shift is because of difficulty of CAPTURE not conviction Robert Chesney 11, Charles I. Francis Professor in Law at the UT School of Law as well as a non-resident Senior Fellow at Brookings, "Examining the Evidence of a Detention-Drone Strike Tradeoff", October 17, www.lawfareblog.com/2011/10/examining-the-evidence-of-a-detention-drone-strike-tradeoff/ Yesterday Jack linked to this piece by Noah AND something much more complex and difficult to measure.
No SCS conflict—economics and deterrence Creehan 12 – Senior Editor of the SAIS (school of advanced international studies, johns Hopkins) Review of International Affairs (Sean, “Assessing the Risks of Conflict in the South China Sea,” Winter/Spring, SAIS Review, Vol. 32, No. 1) Regarding Secretary Clinton’s first requirement, the risk AND significant changes to the status quo are unlikely.
Abolition Court action is a key rallying point that catalyzes social change (blue) Burstein 1991 Paul Burstein, pub. date: 1991, Professor of sociology and political science at the University of Washington, “Legal Mobilization as a Social Movement Tactic: The Struggle for Equal Employment Opportunity”, JSTOR What types of actions should we examine? AND analysts to report how critical court decisions are. Courts have an obligation to restrict indefinite detention authority (blue) Steyn 2003 (Johan Steyn, A Lord of Appeal in Ordinary, November 25, 2003, Twenty-Seventh FA Mann Lecture British Institute of International and Comparative Law and Herbert Smith, Lincoln’s Inn Old Hall, http://www.pegc.us/archive/Articles/Steyn_London_20031125.pdf) The most powerful democracy is detaining hundreds of AND institutions from close scrutiny and¶ accountability”.7 External institutional checks on pres war powers are effective Aziz Z. Huq 12, Assistant Professor of Law, University of Chicago Law School, "Binding the Executive (by Law or by Politics)", May 25, www.law.uchicago.edu/files/file/400-ah-binding.pdf Paulson ’ s genuflection and Obama ’ s AND rules will prove effective in limiting such discretion.
1ar k The War on Terrorism is not constructed, nor can it be deterred. Our criticisms of the government won’t deter those who are ready to strike us. Jean Bethke Elshtain and Laura- Rockefeller Spelman AND School) 2003 “Just War Against Terrorism” Certain critical events in the past remind us AND the threat it poses would not be deterred.
State shift in law enforcement’s key to prevent existential Southeast European attacks SET 9-12 (Experts: Prevention AND /09/12/feature-02) Officials at the Council of the European Union AND their education is the key," he said.
10/12/13
KY RD 5 1AC
Tournament: KY | Round: 5 | Opponent: Liberty CC | Judge: Herndon *1AC* Gray area now on domestic arrests skews lower courts and funnels suspects into the civilian system Elsea 13 (Detention of U.S AND /crs/natsec/R42337.pdf) A majority of the Hamdi Court appears to AND against the United States on a foreign battlefield.
EU Intel Sharing Clear signal for low evidentiary bar now—habeas wins on circumstantial evidence Linzer 11 (Appeals Court Makes It Easier AND -to-hold-gitmo-detainees) In a decision that will likely make it AND a mosaic of incriminating facts,” he wrote.
Law enforcement shift and evidentiary review key to implement European derogation model Cassel 8 (Journal of Criminal Law and AND /9803_811.Cassel.pdf) VIII.CONCLUSION Because of the difficulties in AND do not present that sort of threat.236
Detention policies specifically skew US-EU counterterror cooperation—shared values and recruitment Archick 13 (U.S.-EU AND /crs/row/RS22030.pdf) Detainee Issues and Civil Liberties U.S AND certain prisoners were too dangerous to be released.
EU judicial and intelligence standard co-op is crucial to stopping the next US terror attack—logistical and planning bases Archick 13 (U.S.-EU AND /crs/row/RS22030.pdf) The September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks AND plan to combat radicalization and terrorist recruitment.2
Next nuclear terror attack is extremely likely Jaspal 12 – Associate Professor at the School of Politics and International Relations, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan (Zafar Nawaz, “Nuclear/Radiological AND - 1, 2012, 91:111) The misperception, miscalculation and above all ignorance AND could acquire fissile material from the rogue states.
Terrorism causes miscalculation that draws in Russia and China and culminates in extinction- also causes rising alert levels Ayson 2010 (Robert Ayson, Professor of Strategic Studies and Director of the Centre for Strategic Studies: New Zealand at the Victoria University of Wellington, “After a Terrorist Nuclear Attack: Envisaging Catalytic Effects,” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, Volume 33, Issue 7, July, Available Online to Subscribing Institutions via InformaWorld) A terrorist nuclear attack, and even the AND might not help the chances of nuclear restraint.
Europe’s key to rendition upon release—no due process frustrates the process now Archick 13 (U.S.-EU AND /crs/row/RS22030.pdf) At the same time, the Obama Administration AND that 164 detainees currently remain at Guantánamo.54 Deference Courts accept classified docs in habeas hearings now and BALK at hearsay and statements which would be offered otherwise Benhalim 10 (The Emerging Law of Detention AND _guantanamo_wittes_chesney.pdf) In conceptual terms, Judge Kessler’s hearsay jurisprudence AND level of confidence that hearsay allegations are accurate.
It’s a big issue of deference—aff solves the accordance of special weight to executive evidence Benhalim 10 (The Emerging Law of Detention AND _guantanamo_wittes_chesney.pdf) Both government and habeas counsel are also pushing AND whether the evidentiary dispute concerns hearsay or not.
Intel reliability pushes now—precedent’s key Benhalim 10 (The Emerging Law of Detention AND _guantanamo_wittes_chesney.pdf) While the government complains that Judge Kessler gives AND it adopts a more closely-scrutinizing approach.
Political branches are incapable of resolving clarity—MCA proves Court detainment check’s key to refinement of executive deference Landau 12 (ARTICLE: CHEVRON MEETS YOUNGSTOWN: NATIONAL SECURITY AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATE Joseph Landau Associate Professor, Fordham Law School. December, 2012 Boston University Law Review 92 B.U.L. Rev. 1917. Lexis) B. Congressional Remands After 9/11 AND by Chevron-backers has consequently been absent.
Judicially legitimated flexibility’s key to heg—detention policies are the determinant Knowles 2009 (Robert Knowles, Acting Assistant Professor, New York University School of Law, 41 Ariz. St. L.J. 87 American Hegemony and the Foreign Affairs Constitution) The hegemonic model also reduces the need for AND breaks its own rules, it loses legitimacy. Outweighs material advantage Kagan 2004 (Robert Kagan, senior associate at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, January 24, 2004, “A Tougher War For the U.S. Is One Of Legitimacy,” New York Times, http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/24/books/a-tougher-war-for-the-us-is-one-of-legitimacy.html?pagewanted=allandsrc=pm) Today a darker possibility looms. A great AND of its principles and all who share them.
Hegemony solves great power wars Thayer 2006 (Bradley A. Thayer, Missouri State University Defense and Strategic Studies Institute, November/December, 2006 “In Defense of Primacy,” NATIONAL INTEREST Issue 86) THROUGHOUT HISTORY, peace and stability have been AND humanitarian missions are the equivalent of a blitzkrieg. Decline causes numerous nuclear wars Brzezinski 2012 Zbigniew K. Brzezinski (CSIS counselor and trustee and cochairs the CSIS Advisory Board. He is also the Robert E. Osgood Professor of American Foreign Policy at the School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University, in Washington, D.C. He is cochair of the American Committee for Peace in the Caucasus and a member of the International Advisory Board of the Atlantic Council. He is a former chairman of the American-Ukrainian Advisory Committee. He was a member of the Policy Planning Council of the Department of State from 1966 to 1968; chairman of the Humphrey Foreign Policy Task Force in the 1968 presidential campaign; director of the Trilateral Commission from 1973 to 1976; and principal foreign policy adviser to Jimmy Carter in the 1976 presidential campaign. From 1977 to 1981, Dr. Brzezinski was national security adviser to President Jimmy Carter. In 1981, he was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom for his role in the normalization of U.S.-China relations and for his contributions to the human rights and national security policies of the United States. He was also a member of the President’s Chemical Warfare Commission (1985), the National Security Council–Defense Department Commission on Integrated Long-Term Strategy (1987–1988), and the President’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board (1987–1989). In 1988, he was cochairman of the Bush National Security Advisory Task Force, and in 2004, he was cochairman of a Council on Foreign Relations task force that issued the report Iran: Time for a New Approach. Dr. Brzezinski received a B.A. and M.A. from McGill University (1949, 1950) and Ph.D. from Harvard University (1953). He was a member of the faculties of Columbia University (1960–1989) and Harvard University (1953–1960). Dr. Brzezinski holds honorary degrees from Georgetown University, Williams College, Fordham University, College of the Holy Cross, Alliance College, the Catholic University of Lublin, Warsaw University, and Vilnius University. He is the recipient of numerous honors and awards) February 2012 “After America” http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2012/01/03/after_america?page=0,0 For if America falters, the world is AND itself for a dangerous slide into global turmoil.
Solvency Youngstown makes review inevitable—push for executive deference polarizes the engagement—pragmatic clarification of scope sets a productive precedent Landau 12 (ARTICLE: CHEVRON MEETS YOUNGSTOWN: NATIONAL SECURITY AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATE Joseph Landau Associate Professor, Fordham Law School. December, 2012 Boston University Law Review 92 B.U.L. Rev. 1917. Lexis) E. Chevron, Executive Unilateralism, and AND basis for judicial review of national security policy.
BOP fights now Benhalim 10 (The Emerging Law of Detention AND _guantanamo_wittes_chesney.pdf) Burden of Proof The consensus among the lower AND only if the preponderance standard is too tough.
No circumvention—Court structures national security law Landau 12 (ARTICLE: CHEVRON MEETS YOUNGSTOWN: NATIONAL SECURITY AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATE Joseph Landau Associate Professor, Fordham Law School. December, 2012 Boston University Law Review 92 B.U.L. Rev. 1917. Lexis) *1976 However, in both AND often bereft of clear procedural and substantive guidelines.
XXClassified docs in detention habeas trials key to mosaic preponderance—it’s a judicial abomination Benhalim 10 (The Emerging Law of Detention AND _guantanamo_wittes_chesney.pdf) The idea of a “mosaic theory” AND and certainly cannot govern the Court’s ruling.”202
XXAff forces individual sufficiency of evidence—breaks the tiles Benhalim 10 (The Emerging Law of Detention AND _guantanamo_wittes_chesney.pdf) One can read this language in one of AND answered by Judge Leon in El Gharani. 205
Plan The United States federal judiciary should restrict the war powers authority of the President of the United States to indefinitely detain using circumstantial evidence.
2ac Case-intel No dangerous release—don’t change cases with sound evidence Wittes 12 (The Emerging Law of Detention AND 20full20text20update32913.pdf) Judge Laurence Silberman recently added his voice to AND preponderance standard is unneeded, almost naïve.73 Case-def Relationships are vitiated during detention for those released—release prospects greatly increase cooperation Benhalim 10 (The Emerging Law of Detention AND _guantanamo_wittes_chesney.pdf) Relationship Vitiated After Capture Whereas Al Ginco, AND —serves to vitiate a conceded prior relationship.
ICC CP
Supreme Court key Feldman 2008 (Noah Feldman, law professor at Harvard University and an adjunct senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, September 28, 2008, “When Judges Make Foreign Policy,” New York Times, http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/28/magazine/28law-t.html?pagewanted=alland_r=0) Every generation gets the Constitution that it deserves AND what is somewhat optimistically called the international order.
National courts are better than international courts Downs 2009 (Eyal Benvenisti, Professor of Law, Tel Aviv University, and George W. Downs, Professor of Politics, New York University, “National Courts, Domestic Democracy, and the Evolution of International Law,” European Journal of International Law, Vol. 20 No. 1 , 59 – 72) Under these conditions the continued deference on the AND concerns and levels of ¶ scrutiny. 8 Iran DA
Exec deference is defunct—precedent has unquestionably shifted to the Courts Landau 12 (ARTICLE: CHEVRON MEETS YOUNGSTOWN: NATIONAL SECURITY AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATE Joseph Landau Associate Professor, Fordham Law School. December, 2012 Boston University Law Review 92 B.U.L. Rev. 1917. Lexis) C. Chevron's Detractors While the Supreme Court AND the judiciary's proper role in foreign relations." 325
No link but we solve—Rulings are light in conclusion but heavy in practice Vladeck 11 (Stephen I., Professor of AND “ARTICLE: THE PASSIVE-AGGRESSIVE VIRTUES”) As al-Kidd suggests, even when AND of enemy combatants. Clearly, they have.
Refinement is not restriction—taming deference maintains its credibility Landau 12 (ARTICLE: CHEVRON MEETS YOUNGSTOWN: NATIONAL SECURITY AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATE Joseph Landau Associate Professor, Fordham Law School. December, 2012 Boston University Law Review 92 B.U.L. Rev. 1917. Lexis) III. Guarding Chevron's Borders in National Security AND preserved its relevance to the national security context.
Iran will not miscalculate or be aggressive – too many checks in the system Boroujerdi and Fine 2007 – 57 Syracuse L Rev 619 The potential for groupthink miscalculations is also thwarted AND a boldly offensive or miscalculated action less realistic. 2AC Drone Shift That’s already triggered the shift—aff solves David Ignatius 10, Washington Post, "Our default is killing terrorists by drone attack. Do you care?", December 2, www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/01/AR2010120104458.html Every war brings its own deformations, but AND , but the moral issues are the same." No link—shift is because of difficulty of CAPTURE not conviction Robert Chesney 11, Charles I. Francis Professor in Law at the UT School of Law as well as a non-resident Senior Fellow at Brookings, "Examining the Evidence of a Detention-Drone Strike Tradeoff", October 17, www.lawfareblog.com/2011/10/examining-the-evidence-of-a-detention-drone-strike-tradeoff/ Yesterday Jack linked to this piece by Noah AND something much more complex and difficult to measure. Countries won’t follow the US in terms of drone policy Kenneth Anderson 11, Professor of International Law at American University, 10/9/11, “What Kind of Drones Arms Race Is Coming?,” http://www.volokh.com/2011/10/09/what-kind-of-drones-arms-race-is-coming/#more-51516 New York Times national security correspondent Scott Shane AND China. The predicament is put this way: Eventually, the United States will face a AND citizens, who are viewed as a threat. “Is this the world we want to AND Foreign Relations. “Because we’re creating it.” By asserting that “we’re” creating it AND was, in objective terms, our enemy?) It sounds like it must be true. AND “arms race” surrounding drones will be. Unmanned aerial vehicles have clearly got a big AND developing them will be able to do so. But the point is that this was happening AND , putting some kind of bomb on it. Moving on from the avionics, weaponizing the AND with weapons technologies that are … more discriminating.
2AC Debt Ceiling Reg Debt ceiling won’t pass because of election fears and Obama’s approach prolongs Republican backlash Kaplan 10-3-13 Rebecca AND
As the government shutdown enters its third day AND more areas where they can look for victory.
Shutdown crushes Obama’s agenda O’Brien 10/1 (Michael O'Brien 10/1, "Winners and losers of the government shutdown", 2013, nbcpolitics.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/10/01/20763839-winners-and-losers-of-the-government-shutdown?lite)
Obama¶ The fiscal fight is a double AND comprehensive immigration reform, are on life support.
Political influence does nothing The Economist, 10/1/13, Will voters punish the Republicans?, www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2013/10/shutdown THE federal-government shutdown that started this AND means we're in for a very rocky year. Polls so far are suggesting that the general AND but because Democrats have dropped to meet them. Meanwhile, we can safely assume that the AND no longer demands the complete defunding of Obamacare. There is no equivalent on the moderate- AND levers, but they aren't attached to anything." In other words, it's hard to see AND least. Why mess with a winning formula? The upshot is that even if the broad AND probably in for a pretty lousy political year.
Court Means-limitation avoids politics Geltzer 11 (Boalt Hall School of Law, University of California, Berkeley 2011 Berkeley Journal of International Law 29 Berkeley J. Int'l L. 94 Decisions Detained: The Courts' Embrace of Complexity in Guantanamo-Related Litigation NAME: Joshua Alexander Geltzer a third-year student at Yale Law School, where he is editor-in-chief of the Yale Law Journal. He received his Ph.D. in War Studies from King's College London. His dissertation was published by Routledge as US Counter-Terrorism Strategy and al-Qaeda: Signalling and the Terrorist World-View. Lexis) B. Avoiding Conflict with the Political Branches AND - conflict that the judiciary might well lose.
No impact O'Toole 9/30/13 (James, CNN Money Writer, "Rating Agencies An Afterthought in Debt Ceiling Fight") No one can predict exactly what the consequences AND create a cascade of selling," he said.
Econ collapse doesn’t cause war – prefer our studies Samuel Bazzi (Department of Economics at University of California San Diego) and Christopher Blattman (assistant professor of political science and economics at Yale University) November 2011 “Economic Shocks and Conflict: The (Absence of?) Evidence from Commodity Prices” http://www.chrisblattman.com/documents/research/2011.EconomicShocksAndConflict.pdf?9d7bd4 VI. Discussion and conclusions A. Implications AND for initially significant results than ambiguous ones.20
1ar Drone shift *Status quo detention triggers the link—aff’s key to solve Craig Whitlock 13, Washington Post, "Renditions continue under Obama, despite due-process concerns", January 1, articles.washingtonpost.com/2013-01-01/world/36323571_1_obama-administration-interrogation-drone-strikes The three European men with Somali roots were AND complex, represent one of the few alternatives. pltx Means-limitation doesn’t link to politics—the SPIN is key Geltzer 11 (Boalt Hall School of Law, University of California, Berkeley 2011 Berkeley Journal of International Law 29 Berkeley J. Int'l L. 94 Decisions Detained: The Courts' Embrace of Complexity in Guantanamo-Related Litigation NAME: Joshua Alexander Geltzer a third-year student at Yale Law School, where he is editor-in-chief of the Yale Law Journal. He received his Ph.D. in War Studies from King's College London. His dissertation was published by Routledge as US Counter-Terrorism Strategy and al-Qaeda: Signalling and the Terrorist World-View. Lexis) Avoiding Political Questions As previously mentioned, American AND and military commissions on or near American soil.
Economic collapse doesn’t cause war – no causal connection Thomas P.M. Barnett (senior AND financial-crisis-398-bl.aspx When the global financial crisis struck roughly a AND apace. That's what the Internet is for.
10/12/13
KY RD 8
Tournament: KY | Round: 8 | Opponent: JMU CP | Judge: Bellon 2AC T We meet-Indefinite detention is the determination of “enemy combatant” status and the justifications JENNIFER K. ELSEA Congressional Research Service Presidential Studies Quarterly Volume 33, Issue 3, Presidential Authority to Detain “Enemy Combatants”, J.D. Washington College of Law; Article first published online: 12 SEP 2003 President Bush claims the power, as Commander AND authorized the detention of “enemy ¶ combatants.”
W/M- Constitutional basis is “Improper self-expansion without statutory authority” Landau 12 (ARTICLE: CHEVRON MEETS YOUNGSTOWN: NATIONAL SECURITY AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATE Joseph Landau Associate Professor, Fordham Law School. December, 2012 Boston University Law Review 92 B.U.L. Rev. 1917. Lexis)
State shift in law enforcement’s key to prevent existential Southeast European attacks SET 9-12 (Experts: Prevention AND /09/12/feature-02) Officials at the Council of the European Union AND their education is the key," he said.
Case-def Costs are contextually marginal—withdrawal is way worse Kagan 12 (Not Fade Away The myth AND , http://goo.gl/SEyOM) If we are serious about this exercise in AND involvement in the world than to reduce it.
Sustainable—econ and military—short term snapshots are insufficient Kagan 12 (Not Fade Away The myth AND , http://goo.gl/SEyOM) Powerful as this sense of decline may be AND , but that moment has not yet arrived.
2AC Executive CP
Links to politics—Prez reports the CP to Congress—status of hostilities Bradley and Goldsmith 5 (ARTICLE: CONGRESSIONAL AUTHORIZATION AND THE WAR ON TERRORISM NAME: Curtis A. and Jack L. , * Professor, University of Virginia School of Law. Professor, Harvard Law School. We both recently worked in the Executive Branch. Bradley served as Counselor on International Law in the Legal Adviser's Office of the Department of State Goldsmith served as Special Counsel to the General Counsel of the Department of Defense and as Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal Counsel. Copyright (c) 2005 The Harvard Law Review Association Harvard Law Review May, 2005 118 Harv. L. Rev. 2047. Lexis) The AUMF is arguably more restrictive in one AND exercise of his authority under the AUMF. 147
Court rulings on the ground of “congressional authorization” imply executive restraint and solve better—legal precedent proves Landau 12 (ARTICLE: CHEVRON MEETS YOUNGSTOWN: NATIONAL SECURITY AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATE Joseph Landau Associate Professor, Fordham Law School. December, 2012 Boston University Law Review 92 B.U.L. Rev. 1917. Lexis) Although the underlying theory of deference in Curtiss AND Congress for a second pass at the question.
2AC Debt Ceiling Reg Debt ceiling won’t pass because of election fears and Obama’s approach prolongs Republican backlash- star this card Kaplan 10-3-13 Rebecca AND
As the government shutdown enters its third day AND more areas where they can look for victory.
Political influence does nothing The Economist, 10/1/13, Will voters punish the Republicans?, www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2013/10/shutdown THE federal-government shutdown that started this AND means we're in for a very rocky year. Polls so far are suggesting that the general AND but because Democrats have dropped to meet them. Meanwhile, we can safely assume that the AND no longer demands the complete defunding of Obamacare. There is no equivalent on the moderate- AND levers, but they aren't attached to anything." In other words, it's hard to see AND least. Why mess with a winning formula? The upshot is that even if the broad AND probably in for a pretty lousy political year.
Courts don’t link to politics- avoids political fallout Whittington 2005 (Keith E. Whittington, Professor of Politics - Princeton University, "Interpose Your Friendly Hand: Political Supports for the Exercise of Judicial Review by the United States Supreme Court”, The American Political Science Review, Nov., (99)4, p. 583) There are some issues that politicians cannot easily AND taken, as illustrated in the following case.
Means-limitation solves the link Geltzer 11 (Boalt Hall School of Law, University of California, Berkeley 2011 Berkeley Journal of International Law 29 Berkeley J. Int'l L. 94 Decisions Detained: The Courts' Embrace of Complexity in Guantanamo-Related Litigation NAME: Joshua Alexander Geltzer a third-year student at Yale Law School, where he is editor-in-chief of the Yale Law Journal. He received his Ph.D. in War Studies from King's College London. His dissertation was published by Routledge as US Counter-Terrorism Strategy and al-Qaeda: Signalling and the Terrorist World-View. Lexis) B. Avoiding Conflict with the Political Branches AND - conflict that the judiciary might well lose.
No Debt ceiling impact O'Toole 9/30/13 (James, CNN Money Writer, "Rating Agencies An Afterthought in Debt Ceiling Fight") No one can predict exactly what the consequences AND create a cascade of selling," he said.
Econ collapse doesn’t cause war – prefer our studies Samuel Bazzi (Department of Economics at University of California San Diego) and Christopher Blattman (assistant professor of political science and economics at Yale University) November 2011 “Economic Shocks and Conflict: The (Absence of?) Evidence from Commodity Prices” http://www.chrisblattman.com/documents/research/2011.EconomicShocksAndConflict.pdf?9d7bd4 VI. Discussion and conclusions A. Implications AND for initially significant results than ambiguous ones.20
K Ontology does not come first. David Owen Millennium Journale of international studies 2002 AND
On Pragmatism, Pluralism and Practical Reasoning” Commenting on the ‘philosophical turn’ in IR AND pursuit of generality over that of empirical validity.
Plan is aimed at leaders not the public- we’re the good kind Stephen Lee, 3-1-1996, Cambridge University Press, “Morality, Prudence, and Nuclear Weapons,” p. 327 The prospects for the delegitimation of nuclear weapons AND that talking about it succeeds only in frightening people
Fear of nuclear annihilation is key to prevent future violence with newer weapons J. A. H. Futterman, AND scriptorium/nuke.html, UK: Fisher But the inhibitory effect of reliable nuclear weapons AND sense of urgency that it might otherwise lack.
Theories of desensitization are false – extreme images of suffering re-sensitize and motivate action Stanley Cohen (Emeritus Professor of Sociology at AND States of Denial: Knowing About Atrocities and Suffering Taken individually, the elements of the desensitization AND you to buy a cornflower-blue sweater.
Desensitization should not deter us from taking measures to help others Susan D. Moeller (Assistant Professor in AND , Famine, War and Death.” Pages 319 Compassion fatigue should not be allowed to constrain AND ) can only help Americans become more engaged.
1ar t We also meet statutory restriction--We’re a judicial interpretation of implied statutory limitations on “enemy combatant” status David J. Barron, Professor of Law, Harvard Law School, and Martin S. Lederman, Visiting Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center, 2008, “THE COMMANDER IN CHIEF AT THE LOWEST EBB - FRAMING THE PROBLEM, DOCTRINE, AND ORIGINAL UNDERSTANDING,” Harvard Law Review, January, pp. LN. 4. Judicial Enforcement of Implied Statutory Restrictions AND likely occurrence than war powers scholarship typically assumes. K No impact from numbing Craig Summers, Mount Allison University, Nuclear AND the Psychology of the Nuclear Age” Spring 1991 The logic followed in the book is that AND in our day-to-day lives.
10/12/13
Plan KY RD 5
Tournament: KY | Round: 5 | Opponent: LIberty CC | Judge: The United States federal judiciary should restrict the war powers authority of the President of the United States to indefinitely detain using circumstantial evidence.
10/11/13
Plan RD 3 KY
Tournament: ky | Round: 3 | Opponent: harvard bn | Judge: The United States federal judiciary should restrict the indefinite detention war powers authority of the President of the United States to determine status using circumstantial evidence.
Gray area now on domestic arrests skews lower courts and funnels suspects into the civilian system
Elsea 13 (Detention of U.S. Persons as Enemy Belligerents Jennifer K. Elsea Legislative Attorney July 25, 2013 Congressional Research Service http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/R42337.pdf) A majority of the Hamdi Court appears to have accepted the view that, in AND who fought alongside enemy forces against the United States on a foreign battlefield.
EU Intel Sharing
Law enforcement shift through right to compensation key to implement European derogation model
Cassel 8 (Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 98 Issue 3 Article 3 Spring 2008 Pretrial and Preventive Detention of Suspected Terrorists: Options and Constraints under International Law Douglass Cassel Professor of Law; Director, Center for Civil and Human Rights, Notre Dame Law School. http://www.law.northwestern.edu/journals/jclc/backissues/v98/n3/9803_811.Cassel.pdf) VIII.CONCLUSION Because of the difficulties in relying exclusively on criminal prosecution to confront AND and abuse of others who do not present that sort of threat.236
Detention policies specifically skew US-EU counterterror cooperation—shared values and recruitment
Archick 13 (U.S.-EU Cooperation Against Terrorism Kristin Archick Specialist in European Affairs September 4, 2013 Congressional Research Service http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RS22030.pdf) Detainee Issues and Civil Liberties U.S. and European officials alike maintain that AND detainees, but maintained that certain prisoners were too dangerous to be released.
Damages allowance key to counterterror precedent
Vladeck 13 (Unlawfully Detained by the U.S. Government? Don’t Bother Suing. BY STEVE VLADECK professor of law and the associate dean for scholarship at American University Washington College of Law. SECURITY STATES OCTOBER 17, 2013 http://www.newrepublic.com/article/115216/unlawful-detainment-lawsuits-against-us-government-keep-failing) First, from the plaintiffs’ perspectives, such decisions have the effect, if not AND counterterrorism cases, it may well be damages or bust in these cases.
EU judicial standard co-op is crucial to stopping the next US terror attack—logistical and planning bases
Archick 13 (U.S.-EU Cooperation Against Terrorism Kristin Archick Specialist in European Affairs September 4, 2013 Congressional Research Service http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RS22030.pdf) The September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the United States and the subsequent AND ," as well as a plan to combat radicalization and terrorist recruitment.2
Terrorism causes miscalculation that draws in Russia and China and culminates in extinction- also causes rising alert levels
Ayson 2010 (Robert Ayson, Professor of Strategic Studies and Director of the Centre for Strategic Studies: New Zealand at the Victoria University of Wellington, "After a Terrorist Nuclear Attack: Envisaging Catalytic Effects," Studies in Conflict 26 Terrorism, Volume 33, Issue 7, July, Available Online to Subscribing Institutions via InformaWorld) A terrorist nuclear attack, and even the use of nuclear weapons in response by AND for the terrorists. This might not help the chances of nuclear restraint.
Europe’s key to rendition upon release—no due process frustrates the process now
Archick 13 (U.S.-EU Cooperation Against Terrorism Kristin Archick Specialist in European Affairs September 4, 2013 Congressional Research Service http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RS22030.pdf) At the same time, the Obama Administration has faced significant challenges in its efforts AND security. Press reports indicate that 164 detainees currently remain at Guantánamo.54
Deference
Congressional cause of action resolves court dismissal of damages suits—key to national security accountability
Vladeck 13 (Unlawfully Detained by the U.S. Government? Don’t Bother Suing. BY STEVE VLADECK professor of law and the associate dean for scholarship at American University Washington College of Law. SECURITY STATES OCTOBER 17, 2013 http://www.newrepublic.com/article/115216/unlawful-detainment-lawsuits-against-us-government-keep-failing) Last Monday, on the same day as the opening of the new Supreme Court AND has three especially pernicious consequences for accountability in the national security arena specifically.
The Supreme Court has consistently leaned towards the requirement of damage suit availability now—statutory restriction resolves Circuit court ambiguities
Vladeck 12 (The Subtle New (Constitutional) Holding in Al-Zahrani By Steve Vladeck professor of law and the associate dean for scholarship at American University Washington College of Law. Tuesday, February 21, 2012 at 2:47 PM http://www.lawfareblog.com/2012/02/the-subtle-new-constitutional-holding-in-al-zahrani/) Given Ben’s report on the oral argument, today’s fairly cryptic D.C. AND would have you believe, that the answer necessarily follows from existing precedent.
Political branches are incapable of resolving clarity—MCA proves Court detainment check’s key to refinement of executive deference
Landau 12 (ARTICLE: CHEVRON MEETS YOUNGSTOWN: NATIONAL SECURITY AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATE Joseph Landau Associate Professor, Fordham Law School. December, 2012 Boston University Law Review 92 B.U.L. Rev. 1917. Lexis) B. Congressional Remands After 9/11 Once the post-9/11 AND -strong" deference championed by Chevron-backers has consequently been absent.
Judicially legitimated flexibility’s key to heg—detention policies are the determinant
Knowles 2009 (Robert Knowles, Acting Assistant Professor, New York University School of Law, 41 Ariz. St. L.J. 87 American Hegemony and the Foreign Affairs Constitution) The hegemonic model also reduces the need for executive branch flexibility, and the institutional AND the U.S. breaks its own rules, it loses legitimacy.
Thayer 2006 (Bradley A. Thayer, Missouri State University Defense and Strategic Studies Institute, November/December, 2006 "In Defense of Primacy," NATIONAL INTEREST Issue 86) THROUGHOUT HISTORY, peace and stability have been great benefits of an era where there AND , for the United States humanitarian missions are the equivalent of a blitzkrieg.
Decline causes numerous nuclear wars
Brzezinski 2012 Zbigniew K. Brzezinski (CSIS counselor and trustee and cochairs the CSIS Advisory Board. He is also the Robert E. Osgood Professor of American Foreign Policy at the School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University, in Washington, D.C. He is cochair of the American Committee for Peace in the Caucasus and a member of the International Advisory Board of the Atlantic Council. He is a former chairman of the American-Ukrainian Advisory Committee. He was a member of the Policy Planning Council of the Department of State from 1966 to 1968; chairman of the Humphrey Foreign Policy Task Force in the 1968 presidential campaign; director of the Trilateral Commission from 1973 to 1976; and principal foreign policy adviser to Jimmy Carter in the 1976 presidential campaign. From 1977 to 1981, Dr. Brzezinski was national security adviser to President Jimmy Carter. In 1981, he was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom for his role in the normalization of U.S.-China relations and for his contributions to the human rights and national security policies of the United States. He was also a member of the President’s Chemical Warfare Commission (1985), the National Security Council–Defense Department Commission on Integrated Long-Term Strategy (1987–1988), and the President’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board (1987–1989). In 1988, he was cochairman of the Bush National Security Advisory Task Force, and in 2004, he was cochairman of a Council on Foreign Relations task force that issued the report Iran: Time for a New Approach. Dr. Brzezinski received a B.A. and M.A. from McGill University (1949, 1950) and Ph.D. from Harvard University (1953). He was a member of the faculties of Columbia University (1960–1989) and Harvard University (1953–1960). Dr. Brzezinski holds honorary degrees from Georgetown University, Williams College, Fordham University, College of the Holy Cross, Alliance College, the Catholic University of Lublin, Warsaw University, and Vilnius University. He is the recipient of numerous honors and awards) February 2012 "After America" http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2012/01/03/after_america?page=0,0 For if America falters, the world is unlikely to be dominated by a single AND policy — or start bracing itself for a dangerous slide into global turmoil.
Solvency
Youngstown makes review inevitable—push for executive deference polarizes the engagement—pragmatic clarification of scope sets a productive precedent
Landau 12 (ARTICLE: CHEVRON MEETS YOUNGSTOWN: NATIONAL SECURITY AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATE Joseph Landau Associate Professor, Fordham Law School. December, 2012 Boston University Law Review 92 B.U.L. Rev. 1917. Lexis) E. Chevron, Executive Unilateralism, and Civil Libertarianism Although certain Chevron-backers AND rule-of-law basis for judicial review of national security policy.
No circumvention—Court structures national security law
Landau 12 (ARTICLE: CHEVRON MEETS YOUNGSTOWN: NATIONAL SECURITY AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATE Joseph Landau Associate Professor, Fordham Law School. December, 2012 Boston University Law Review 92 B.U.L. Rev. 1917. Lexis) ~*1976~ However, in both the domestic and national security contexts, AND field of law that is often bereft of clear procedural and substantive guidelines.
Plan
The United States federal government should restrict the war powers authority of the President of the United States to assert, on behalf of the United States, immunity from judicial review through a statutory cause of action allowing civil suits brought against the United States by those unlawfully injured by indefinite detention
11/1/13
UMKC RD 4
Tournament: UMKC | Round: 4 | Opponent: UNLV JS | Judge: Osborn Slv No link but we solve—Rulings are light in conclusion but heavy in practice Vladeck 11 (Stephen I., Professor of AND “ARTICLE: THE PASSIVE-AGGRESSIVE VIRTUES”) As al-Kidd suggests, even when AND of enemy combatants. Clearly, they have.
Refinement is not restriction—taming deference maintains its credible relevance Landau 12 (ARTICLE: CHEVRON MEETS YOUNGSTOWN: NATIONAL SECURITY AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATE Joseph Landau Associate Professor, Fordham Law School. December, 2012 Boston University Law Review 92 B.U.L. Rev. 1917. Lexis) III. Guarding Chevronand#39;s Borders in National Security AND preserved its relevance to the national security context. Assign warming zero percent probability – flawed models and predictions Craig D. Idso (founder and chairman AND education/reports/prudentpath/prudentpath.pdf As presently constituted, earth’s atmosphere contains just AND meet the much greater challenge to which they aspire
Case-eu Relationships are vitiated during detention for those released—release prospects greatly increase cooperation Benhalim 10 (The Emerging Law of Detention AND _guantanamo_wittes_chesney.pdf) Relationship Vitiated After Capture Whereas Al Ginco, AND —serves to vitiate a conceded prior relationship.
State shift in law enforcement’s key to prevent existential Southeast European attacks SET 9-12 (Experts: Prevention AND /09/12/feature-02) Officials at the Council of the European Union AND their education is the key,and#34; he said.
No dangerous release—don’t change cases with sound evidence Wittes 12 (The Emerging Law of Detention AND 20full20text20update32913.pdf) Judge Laurence Silberman recently added his voice to AND preponderance standard is unneeded, almost naïve.73
Def Sustainable—econ and military—short term snapshots are insufficient Kagan 12 (Not Fade Away The myth AND , http://goo.gl/SEyOM) Powerful as this sense of decline may be AND , but that moment has not yet arrived.
No US/China war—It’s in neither country’s best interest Ackerman 2011 (Robert Ackerman, May 10, 2011, “War Between China, U.S. Not Likely,” http://www.afcea.org/signal/signalscape/index.php/2011/05/10/11510/) The United States and China are not likely AND , which has economic problems of its own.
Con Con CP
Supreme Court key to intl model Feldman 2008 (Noah Feldman, law professor at Harvard University and an adjunct senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, September 28, 2008, “When Judges Make Foreign Policy,” New York Times, http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/28/magazine/28law-t.html?pagewanted=alland_r=0) Every generation gets the Constitution that it deserves AND what is somewhat optimistically called the international order.
Court’s key to successful Congress push Landau 12 (ARTICLE: CHEVRON MEETS YOUNGSTOWN: NATIONAL SECURITY AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATE Joseph Landau Associate Professor, Fordham Law School. December, 2012 Boston University Law Review 92 B.U.L. Rev. 1917. Lexis) While Chevronand#39;s advocates have frequently promoted the application AND squarely within, foundational principles of administrative law.
Legitimacy is key to failed states Loomis 2008 (Andrew Joseph Loomis, PhD in Government from Georgetown, August 4, 2008, “LEVERAGING LEGITIMACY IN SECURING U.S. LEADERSHIP: NORMATIVE DIMENSIONS OF HEGEMONIC AUTHORITY,” http://repository.library.georgetown.edu/bitstream/handle/10822/553090/loomisAndrewJoseph.pdf?sequence=1) The results of this study suggest that U AND U.S. leadership among its allies. Extinction Manwaring 2005 (Max G. Manwaring, AND October 2005, pg. PUB628.pdf) President Chávez also understands that the process leading AND global security, peace, and prosperity.65
Narrow limits force Congressional re-authorization and check authority roll-out Geltzer 11 (Boalt Hall School of Law, University of California, Berkeley 2011 Berkeley Journal of International Law 29 Berkeley J. Intand#39;l L. 94 Decisions Detained: The Courtsand#39; Embrace of Complexity in Guantanamo-Related Litigation NAME: Joshua Alexander Geltzer a third-year student at Yale Law School, where he is editor-in-chief of the Yale Law Journal. He received his Ph.D. in War Studies from Kingand#39;s College London. His dissertation was published by Routledge as US Counter-Terrorism Strategy and al-Qaeda: Signalling and the Terrorist World-View. Lexis) In the end, the courtsand#39; embrace of AND up with the Guantanamo that they really wanted.
2AC Debt Ceiling Reg They’ve got nothing—polarization and deficit reductions are the nail in the coffin for now Weisman 9-12 (Boehner Seeking Democrats’ Help on Fiscal Talks By JONATHAN WEISMAN Published: September 12, 2013 http:// AND -deal.html?_r=0) Senator Richard J. Durbin of Illinois, AND something to report, we’ll let you know.”
No vote coming—no GOP base and Dems polarized Weisman 9-12 (Boehner Seeking Democrats’ Help on Fiscal Talks By JONATHAN WEISMAN Published: September 12, 2013 http:// AND -deal.html?_r=0) It was delayed indefinitely as House Republicans resumed AND that many Republicans had lost touch with reality.
PC doesn’t solve and the perception of talks causes the DA Everett 13 (Lew reiterates Obama wonand#39;t negotiate AND -debt-limit-169332.html) Treasury Secretary Jack Lew says President Barack Obama AND full faith and credit of the United States.and#34;
No downgrade impact – credit rating agencies are unconcerned due to deficit cuts Dan Weil 9-13 Credit Ratings Agencies More Sanguine About Debt Limit This Year Friday, 13 Sep 2013 08:28 AM http://www.moneynews.com/Economy/Credit-ratings-S-P-Congress/2013/09/13/id/525502#ixzz2emJAwe3T As Congress and the White House fought over AND and#39;OK, does it really matter?and#39;and#34;
Means limitation avoids politics Geltzer 11 (Boalt Hall School of Law, University of California, Berkeley 2011 Berkeley Journal of International Law 29 Berkeley J. Intand#39;l L. 94 Decisions Detained: The Courtsand#39; Embrace of Complexity in Guantanamo-Related Litigation NAME: Joshua Alexander Geltzer a third-year student at Yale Law School, where he is editor-in-chief of the Yale Law Journal. He received his Ph.D. in War Studies from Kingand#39;s College London. His dissertation was published by Routledge as US Counter-Terrorism Strategy and al-Qaeda: Signalling and the Terrorist World-View. Lexis) B. Avoiding Conflict with the Political Branches AND - conflict that the judiciary might well lose.
Congress gets involved but solves politics Breyer 6 (Concurring Opinion, Justice Stephen Breyer and Anthony Kennedy, in part; SALIM AHMED HAMDAN, Petitioner v. DONALD H. RUMSFELD, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, et al. No. 05-184 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 548 U.S. 557; 126 S. Ct. 2749; 165 L. Ed. 2d 723; 2006 U.S. LEXIS 5185; 19 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 452 March 28, 2006, Argued June 29, 2006, Decided; Lexis) *636 Justice Breyer, with AND Parts I and II, concurring in part. They just decided a whole slew of controversial cases Wolf 2013 (Richard Wolf, August 12, 2013, “Supreme Court urged to open up,” USA Today, http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/08/12/supreme-court-urged-to-allow-cameras/2644779/) A year-long string of controversial cases AND Kendall, president of the Constitutional Accountability Center. Plan is a huge win for Obama Catalini 2013 (Michael Catalini, May 30, 2013, “Political Barriers Stand Between Obama and Closing Guantanamo Facility,” http://www.nationaljournal.com/politics/political-barriers-stand-between-obama-and-closing-guantanamo-facility-20130503) The Cuban camp is grabbing headlines again because AND the time, remembers the debate very well.
Tournament: UMKC | Round: 6 | Opponent: USC HS | Judge: Koehle 2AC Case-intel Law enforcement solves Hakimi 8 (2008 International Standards for Detaining AND ) A. Rejecting the Armed-Conflict Approach AND is common under any legal system.and#34;and#39; 125
State shift in law enforcement’s key to prevent existential Southeast European attacks SET 9-12 (Experts: Prevention AND /09/12/feature-02) Officials at the Council of the European Union AND their education is the key,and#34; he said.
Case-def Don’t give in to stripping—powers expanded on detention Vladeck 11 (Stephen I., Professor of AND “ARTICLE: THE PASSIVE-AGGRESSIVE VIRTUES”) As al-Kidd suggests, even when AND of enemy combatants. Clearly, they have.
2AC Executive CP *compliance = normal means He’s got to report the cp to Congress—status of hostilities Bradley and Goldsmith 5 (ARTICLE: CONGRESSIONAL AUTHORIZATION AND THE WAR ON TERRORISM NAME: Curtis A. and Jack L. , * Professor, University of Virginia School of Law. Professor, Harvard Law School. We both recently worked in the Executive Branch. Bradley served as Counselor on International Law in the Legal Adviserand#39;s Office of the Department of State Goldsmith served as Special Counsel to the General Counsel of the Department of Defense and as Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal Counsel. Copyright (c) 2005 The Harvard Law Review Association Harvard Law Review May, 2005 118 Harv. L. Rev. 2047. Lexis) The AUMF is arguably more restrictive in one AND exercise of his authority under the AUMF. 147
Authorization rulings solve the CP—national security case law precedent Landau 12 (ARTICLE: CHEVRON MEETS YOUNGSTOWN: NATIONAL SECURITY AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATE Joseph Landau Associate Professor, Fordham Law School. December, 2012 Boston University Law Review 92 B.U.L. Rev. 1917. Lexis) Although the underlying theory of deference in Curtiss AND Congress for a second pass at the question.
A2 backlash—Courts are careful but evidentiary deference limitations solve Landau 12 (ARTICLE: CHEVRON MEETS YOUNGSTOWN: NATIONAL SECURITY AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATE Joseph Landau Associate Professor, Fordham Law School. December, 2012 Boston University Law Review 92 B.U.L. Rev. 1917. Lexis) The Hamdi Court was deeply divided, producing AND to the rights of the Nationand#39;s citizens.and#34; 247
XO rollback—not congressionally delegated authority Landau 12 (ARTICLE: CHEVRON MEETS YOUNGSTOWN: NATIONAL SECURITY AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATE Joseph Landau Associate Professor, Fordham Law School. December, 2012 Boston University Law Review 92 B.U.L. Rev. 1917. Lexis) 2. Chevron Step Zero A closely related AND promulgated in the exercise of congressionally delegated authority. Drones Relationships are vitiated during detention for those released—release prospects greatly increase cooperation Benhalim 10 (The Emerging Law of Detention AND _guantanamo_wittes_chesney.pdf) Relationship Vitiated After Capture Whereas Al Ginco, AND —serves to vitiate a conceded prior relationship. No dangerous release—don’t change cases with sound evidence Wittes 12 (The Emerging Law of Detention AND 20full20text20update32913.pdf) Judge Laurence Silberman recently added his voice to AND preponderance standard is unneeded, almost naïve.73
EU co-op means they get rendered there Worthington 13 (European Parliament to Debate Motion Calling for Closure of Guantánamo 22.5.13 Andy Worthington, AND -for-closure-of-guantanamo/) Tomorrow, just before President Obama delivers a AND can help to make sure this doesn’t happen.”
Means limitation avoids politics Geltzer 11 (Boalt Hall School of Law, University of California, Berkeley 2011 Berkeley Journal of International Law 29 Berkeley J. Intand#39;l L. 94 Decisions Detained: The Courtsand#39; Embrace of Complexity in Guantanamo-Related Litigation NAME: Joshua Alexander Geltzer a third-year student at Yale Law School, where he is editor-in-chief of the Yale Law Journal. He received his Ph.D. in War Studies from Kingand#39;s College London. His dissertation was published by Routledge as US Counter-Terrorism Strategy and al-Qaeda: Signalling and the Terrorist World-View. Lexis) B. Avoiding Conflict with the Political Branches AND - conflict that the judiciary might well lose.
Congress may get involved but solves Breyer 6 (Concurring Opinion, Justice Stephen Breyer and Anthony Kennedy, in part; SALIM AHMED HAMDAN, Petitioner v. DONALD H. RUMSFELD, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, et al. No. 05-184 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 548 U.S. 557; 126 S. Ct. 2749; 165 L. Ed. 2d 723; 2006 U.S. LEXIS 5185; 19 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 452 March 28, 2006, Argued June 29, 2006, Decided; Lexis) *636 Justice Breyer, with AND Parts I and II, concurring in part. They just decided a whole slew of controversial cases Wolf 2013 (Richard Wolf, August 12, 2013, “Supreme Court urged to open up,” USA Today, http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/08/12/supreme-court-urged-to-allow-cameras/2644779/) A year-long string of controversial cases AND Kendall, president of the Constitutional Accountability Center. Plan is a huge win for Obama Catalini 2013 (Michael Catalini, May 30, 2013, “Political Barriers Stand Between Obama and Closing Guantanamo Facility,” http://www.nationaljournal.com/politics/political-barriers-stand-between-obama-and-closing-guantanamo-facility-20130503) The Cuban camp is grabbing headlines again because AND the time, remembers the debate very well.
Either it won’t pass or strikes are inevitable- doesn’t need congress for cred Gene Healy September 2, 2013.
AND
On Saturday, President Obama announced that — AND that Congress would say no. He better start Legitimacy is key to failed states Loomis 2008 (Andrew Joseph Loomis, PhD in Government from Georgetown, August 4, 2008, “LEVERAGING LEGITIMACY IN SECURING U.S. LEADERSHIP: NORMATIVE DIMENSIONS OF HEGEMONIC AUTHORITY,” http://repository.library.georgetown.edu/bitstream/handle/10822/553090/loomisAndrewJoseph.pdf?sequence=1) The results of this study suggest that U AND U.S. leadership among its allies. Extinction Manwaring 2005 (Max G. Manwaring, AND October 2005, pg. PUB628.pdf) President Chávez also understands that the process leading AND global security, peace, and prosperity.65
K Court action is key to legitimacy Knowles 2009 (Robert Knowles, Acting Assistant Professor, New York University School of Law, 41 Ariz. St. L.J. 87 American Hegemony and the Foreign Affairs Constitution) The enemy combatant litigation also underscores the extent AND to counter-act this loss of prestige. Calculation is good and doesn’t devalue life Revesz 2008 Richard L. Revesz (Dean and Lawrence King Professor of Law at New York University School of Law, JD Yale Law School) and Michael A Livermore. (JD NYU School of Law, Executive Director of the Institute for Policy Integrity, and Managing director of the NYU Law Review). Retaking Rationality How Cots-Benefit Analysis Can Better protect the Environment and Our Health. 2008. P. 1-4. Governmental decisions are also fundamentally different from personal AND act effectively to bring about a better world.
Court action is a key rallying point that catalyzes social change (blue) Burstein 1991 Paul Burstein, pub. date: 1991, Professor of sociology and political science at the University of Washington, “Legal Mobilization as a Social Movement Tactic: The Struggle for Equal Employment Opportunity”, JSTOR What types of actions should we examine? AND analysts to report how critical court decisions are. Biopower doesn’t create bear life or void life of value. Mika Ojakangas (Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies AND 2, p. 5-28, May Moreover, life as the object and the AND by fostering and generating “forms of life”.
1ar
Pltx Won’t pass. No vote until November. Budget thumps the DA. Burgess Everett 9/15 (Politico) AND -syria-vote-96806.html Congress can breathe a sigh of relief: AND stockpiles of chemical weapons to the international community. Means-limitation doesn’t link to politics—the SPIN is key Geltzer 11 (Boalt Hall School of Law, University of California, Berkeley 2011 Berkeley Journal of International Law 29 Berkeley J. Intand#39;l L. 94 Decisions Detained: The Courtsand#39; Embrace of Complexity in Guantanamo-Related Litigation NAME: Joshua Alexander Geltzer a third-year student at Yale Law School, where he is editor-in-chief of the Yale Law Journal. He received his Ph.D. in War Studies from Kingand#39;s College London. His dissertation was published by Routledge as US Counter-Terrorism Strategy and al-Qaeda: Signalling and the Terrorist World-View. Lexis) Avoiding Political Questions As previously mentioned, American AND and military commissions on or near American soil.
K
Discursive focus on the state doesn’t legitimize it and is tactically necessary Frost 1996 (Mervyn Frost, Professor at the University of Kent, “Ethics In International Relations A Constitutive Theory,” pp. 90-91) A first objection which seems inherent in Donelanand#39;s AND under law, representative government and so on.
10/3/13
UMKC RD 8
Tournament: UMKC | Round: 8 | Opponent: UNT FO | Judge: Feldman 2AC 2AC T “Judicial” W/M- Constitutional basis is “Improper self-expansion without statutory authority” Landau 12 (ARTICLE: CHEVRON MEETS YOUNGSTOWN: NATIONAL SECURITY AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATE Joseph Landau Associate Professor, Fordham Law School. December, 2012 Boston University Law Review 92 B.U.L. Rev. 1917. Lexis)
Step One Deference to Agency Self AND , and it reinstated the DOL rule. 111 Effects of the plan are the advantages—constitutional restriction demands executive and congressional compliance Spiro, 2001 (Peter J. Spiro, Professor, Hofstra University School of Law; Visiting Professor, University of Texas School of Law, Texas Law Review, April, lexis) The increments approach answers these objections, at AND prevail where it is rejected by other actors.
Indefinite detention is determination of “enemy combatant” status, the act, and the permissions and justifications JENNIFER K. ELSEA Congressional Research Service Presidential Studies Quarterly Volume 33, Issue 3, Presidential Authority to Detain “Enemy Combatants”, J.D. Washington College of Law; Article first published online: 12 SEP 2003 President Bush claims the power, as Commander AND authorized the detention of “enemy ¶ combatants.”
Case-intel Law enforcement solves Hakimi 8 (2008 International Standards for Detaining AND ) A. Rejecting the Armed-Conflict Approach AND is common under any legal system."' 125
Case-def Court action is key to legitimacy Knowles 2009 (Robert Knowles, Acting Assistant Professor, New York University School of Law, 41 Ariz. St. L.J. 87 American Hegemony and the Foreign Affairs Constitution) The enemy combatant litigation also underscores the extent AND to counter-act this loss of prestige. 2AC Executive CP Links to politics—Prez reports the CP to Congress—status of hostilities Bradley and Goldsmith 5 (ARTICLE: CONGRESSIONAL AUTHORIZATION AND THE WAR ON TERRORISM NAME: Curtis A. and Jack L. , * Professor, University of Virginia School of Law. Professor, Harvard Law School. We both recently worked in the Executive Branch. Bradley served as Counselor on International Law in the Legal Adviser's Office of the Department of State Goldsmith served as Special Counsel to the General Counsel of the Department of Defense and as Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal Counsel. Copyright (c) 2005 The Harvard Law Review Association Harvard Law Review May, 2005 118 Harv. L. Rev. 2047. Lexis) The AUMF is arguably more restrictive in one AND exercise of his authority under the AUMF. 147
Court rulings on the ground of “congressional authorization” imply executive restraint and solve better—national security law precedent proves Landau 12 (ARTICLE: CHEVRON MEETS YOUNGSTOWN: NATIONAL SECURITY AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATE Joseph Landau Associate Professor, Fordham Law School. December, 2012 Boston University Law Review 92 B.U.L. Rev. 1917. Lexis) Although the underlying theory of deference in Curtiss AND Congress for a second pass at the question. Closing Gitmo causes release into the United States McCarthy 2009 Andrew C. McCarthy is a senior fellow at the National Review Institute and the author of Willful Blindness: A Memoir of the Jihad October 23, 2009 National Review “Imprison Here, Release Here” http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/228465/imprison-here-release-here/andrew-c-mccarthy Here’s the thing: Because we still have AND States and had no legal right to enter. Can’t restrain on constitutional grounds—that’s key Landau 12 (ARTICLE: CHEVRON MEETS YOUNGSTOWN: NATIONAL SECURITY AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATE Joseph Landau Associate Professor, Fordham Law School. December, 2012 Boston University Law Review 92 B.U.L. Rev. 1917. Lexis) The Hamdi Court was deeply divided, producing AND to the rights of the Nation's citizens." 247
Exec alone fails—restraint doesn’t warrant deference to his decisions—district court momentum overwhelms Landau 12 (ARTICLE: CHEVRON MEETS YOUNGSTOWN: NATIONAL SECURITY AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATE Joseph Landau Associate Professor, Fordham Law School. December, 2012 Boston University Law Review 92 B.U.L. Rev. 1917. Lexis) 2. Chevron Step Zero A closely related AND promulgated in the exercise of congressionally delegated authority.
Amend/Con Con CP
Supreme Court key to intl model Feldman 2008 (Noah Feldman, law professor at Harvard University and an adjunct senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, September 28, 2008, “When Judges Make Foreign Policy,” New York Times, http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/28/magazine/28law-t.html?pagewanted=alland_r=0) Every generation gets the Constitution that it deserves AND what is somewhat optimistically called the international order.
Court’s key to successful Congress push Landau 12 (ARTICLE: CHEVRON MEETS YOUNGSTOWN: NATIONAL SECURITY AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATE Joseph Landau Associate Professor, Fordham Law School. December, 2012 Boston University Law Review 92 B.U.L. Rev. 1917. Lexis) While Chevron's advocates have frequently promoted the application AND squarely within, foundational principles of administrative law.
Legitimacy is key to failed states Loomis 2008 (Andrew Joseph Loomis, PhD in Government from Georgetown, August 4, 2008, “LEVERAGING LEGITIMACY IN SECURING U.S. LEADERSHIP: NORMATIVE DIMENSIONS OF HEGEMONIC AUTHORITY,” http://repository.library.georgetown.edu/bitstream/handle/10822/553090/loomisAndrewJoseph.pdf?sequence=1) The results of this study suggest that U AND U.S. leadership among its allies. Extinction Manwaring 2005 (Max G. Manwaring, AND October 2005, pg. PUB628.pdf) President Chávez also understands that the process leading AND global security, peace, and prosperity.65
Narrow limits force Congressional re-authorization and check authority roll-out Geltzer 11 (Boalt Hall School of Law, University of California, Berkeley 2011 Berkeley Journal of International Law 29 Berkeley J. Int'l L. 94 Decisions Detained: The Courts' Embrace of Complexity in Guantanamo-Related Litigation NAME: Joshua Alexander Geltzer a third-year student at Yale Law School, where he is editor-in-chief of the Yale Law Journal. He received his Ph.D. in War Studies from King's College London. His dissertation was published by Routledge as US Counter-Terrorism Strategy and al-Qaeda: Signalling and the Terrorist World-View. Lexis) In the end, the courts' embrace of AND up with the Guantanamo that they really wanted. 2AC Debt Ceiling Reg They’ve got nothing—polarization and deficit reductions are the nail in the coffin for now Weisman 9-12 (Boehner Seeking Democrats’ Help on Fiscal Talks By JONATHAN WEISMAN Published: September 12, 2013 http:// AND -deal.html?_r=0) Senator Richard J. Durbin of Illinois, AND something to report, we’ll let you know.”
No vote coming—no GOP base and Dems polarized Weisman 9-12 (Boehner Seeking Democrats’ Help on Fiscal Talks By JONATHAN WEISMAN Published: September 12, 2013 http:// AND -deal.html?_r=0) It was delayed indefinitely as House Republicans resumed AND that many Republicans had lost touch with reality.
PC doesn’t solve and the perception of talks causes the DA Everett 13 (Lew reiterates Obama won't negotiate AND -debt-limit-169332.html) Treasury Secretary Jack Lew says President Barack Obama AND full faith and credit of the United States."
Means limitation avoids politics Geltzer 11 (Boalt Hall School of Law, University of California, Berkeley 2011 Berkeley Journal of International Law 29 Berkeley J. Int'l L. 94 Decisions Detained: The Courts' Embrace of Complexity in Guantanamo-Related Litigation NAME: Joshua Alexander Geltzer a third-year student at Yale Law School, where he is editor-in-chief of the Yale Law Journal. He received his Ph.D. in War Studies from King's College London. His dissertation was published by Routledge as US Counter-Terrorism Strategy and al-Qaeda: Signalling and the Terrorist World-View. Lexis) B. Avoiding Conflict with the Political Branches AND - conflict that the judiciary might well lose.
If Congress gets involved it solves the link Breyer 6 (Concurring Opinion, Justice Stephen Breyer and Anthony Kennedy, in part; SALIM AHMED HAMDAN, Petitioner v. DONALD H. RUMSFELD, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, et al. No. 05-184 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 548 U.S. 557; 126 S. Ct. 2749; 165 L. Ed. 2d 723; 2006 U.S. LEXIS 5185; 19 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 452 March 28, 2006, Argued June 29, 2006, Decided; Lexis) *636 Justice Breyer, with AND Parts I and II, concurring in part. They just decided a whole slew of controversial cases Wolf 2013 (Richard Wolf, August 12, 2013, “Supreme Court urged to open up,” USA Today, http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/08/12/supreme-court-urged-to-allow-cameras/2644779/) A year-long string of controversial cases AND Kendall, president of the Constitutional Accountability Center. Plan is a huge win for Obama Catalini 2013 (Michael Catalini, May 30, 2013, “Political Barriers Stand Between Obama and Closing Guantanamo Facility,” http://www.nationaljournal.com/politics/political-barriers-stand-between-obama-and-closing-guantanamo-facility-20130503) The Cuban camp is grabbing headlines again because AND the time, remembers the debate very well.
Econ collapse doesn’t cause war – prefer our studies Samuel Bazzi (Department of Economics at University of California San Diego) and Christopher Blattman (assistant professor of political science and economics at Yale University) November 2011 “Economic Shocks and Conflict: The (Absence of?) Evidence from Commodity Prices” http://www.chrisblattman.com/documents/research/2011.EconomicShocksAndConflict.pdf?9d7bd4 VI. Discussion and conclusions A. Implications AND for initially significant results than ambiguous ones.20
1ar Means-limitation doesn’t link to politics—the SPIN is key Geltzer 11 (Boalt Hall School of Law, University of California, Berkeley 2011 Berkeley Journal of International Law 29 Berkeley J. Int'l L. 94 Decisions Detained: The Courts' Embrace of Complexity in Guantanamo-Related Litigation NAME: Joshua Alexander Geltzer a third-year student at Yale Law School, where he is editor-in-chief of the Yale Law Journal. He received his Ph.D. in War Studies from King's College London. His dissertation was published by Routledge as US Counter-Terrorism Strategy and al-Qaeda: Signalling and the Terrorist World-View. Lexis) Avoiding Political Questions As previously mentioned, American AND and military commissions on or near American soil.