General Actions:
Wiki: opencaselist13
▼:
Document Index
»
Space: Michigan State
▼:
Document Index
»
Page: Ramesh-Thur Aff
Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Video | Edit/Delete |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSUF | 1 | Irvine San Fran State University PA | Larson, Andy |
| ||||
CSUF | 3 | Michigan KK | Gannon, Seth |
| ||||
CSUF | 6 | Liberty CE | Bankey |
| ||||
CSUF | Doubles | Kentucky GR | JP, Hardy, Lucas-Bolin |
| ||||
CSUF | Octas | Wake DL | Cronin, Ewing, Patrick Kennedy, Weil, Najor |
| ||||
Clay | 2 | Cal SW | Roark |
| ||||
Clay | 4 | Kentucky GV | Brown, Nick |
| ||||
Clay | 6 | Wake MS | Barouch |
| ||||
Clay | 7 | USC PV | Revelins |
| ||||
GSU | Doubles | Wake HS | Cohn, Paul, Kall |
| ||||
GSU | 2 | Michigan CH | Severson |
| ||||
GSU | 4 | Kentucky GV | Norris |
| ||||
GSU | 5 | Northwestern MV | Malsin |
| ||||
GSU | 7 | Georgetown AM | Hays Watson |
| ||||
Harvard | 1 | Wayne JS | Susko |
| ||||
Harvard | 5 | Wake DL | Fitzmier |
| ||||
Harvard | 8 | OU CL | Kirk |
| ||||
Harvard | 3 | Kansas BC | Hardy |
| ||||
Indiana | 2 | Indiana PS | Kelly, Casey |
| ||||
Indiana | 3 | Louisville LR | Frederick |
| ||||
Indiana | 5 | Iowa HK | Vats |
| ||||
Indiana | 7 | Michigan CP | Hingstman |
| ||||
Indiana | Quarters | Indiana HF | Kelly Young, Meloche, Casey Kelly |
| ||||
NDT | 7 | NU MV | Susko, Layron, Hall |
| ||||
National Debate Tournament | 2 | Georgia CS | Kimball, Bagwell, Hardy |
| ||||
National Debate Tournament | 2 | Georgia CS | Kimball, Bagwell, Hardy |
| ||||
Texas | 1 | Wake DL | Cook |
| ||||
Texas | 3 | Georgetown ErMc | Katsulas |
| ||||
Texas | 5 | Houston LR | Abelkop, Adam |
| ||||
Texas | 7 | Texas CM | Smelko |
| ||||
Texas | Doubles | Emory JS | Gramzinski, Arnett, Walters |
| ||||
UK RR | 2 | Michigan AP | Hardy |
| ||||
UK RR | 4 | Kentucky GR | Green, Justin |
| ||||
UK RR | 6 | Emory JS | Russell |
| ||||
UK RR | 8 | Oklahoma LM | Hall, Sherry |
| ||||
USC | 2 | Emory AB | Kallmyer |
| ||||
USC | 4 | UNLV RV | Nikolic |
| ||||
USC | 6 | OU LW | Guevara, Omar |
| ||||
USC | Doubles | OU BC | Sarah Lundeen, Crowe, Severson |
| ||||
USC | Octas | Kansas BC | Nikolic, Warden, Kallmyer, Layton, Brovero |
| ||||
Wake | 1 | Wichita State MR | White, Janna |
| ||||
Wake | 3 | Rutgers RS | Harper, Allison |
| ||||
Wake | 6 | Georgetown AM | Brossmann |
| ||||
Wake | 8 | NU OP | Andres Gannon |
| ||||
Wake | Quarters | Northwestern MV | Seth Gannon, Kallmyer, Brovero, Weiner, Feldman |
| ||||
ndt | 6 | wake lw | morris, munoz, woodruff |
|
Tournament | Round | Report |
---|---|---|
CSUF | 1 | Opponent: Irvine San Fran State University PA | Judge: Larson, Andy 1AC Hostilities general with a drone and executive precedents advantage (same as Wake 6 or USC Dubs) 1NC-2NR Colonial Settlers K |
CSUF | 3 | Opponent: Michigan KK | Judge: Gannon, Seth 1AC Hostilities 1AC from UK Round 2 with plan from Wake 6 SOP R2P and Warfighting 1NC 1) Iran Politics (Israel Strikes) 2)QDR CP 3) LiberalismBadiou K 4) Case with WF and circumvention 2NC Politics 1NR Case 2NR DA and case |
CSUF | 6 | Opponent: Liberty CE | Judge: Bankey 1AC Hostilities with new plan old executive precedent advantage and old Bush doctrine advantage (disease India relations and space) 1NC-2NR Culture and Law K |
CSUF | Doubles | Opponent: Kentucky GR | Judge: JP, Hardy, Lucas-Bolin 1AC Hostilities with China advantage SOP and Iran 1NC 1) Advantage CP to Ban Arms sales 2) ESR CP 3) Nuclear PIC 4) TPA Politics 5) T Restrictions 2NC Nuclear PIC and case 1NR Politics 2NR Nuclear PIC |
CSUF | Octas | Opponent: Wake DL | Judge: Cronin, Ewing, Patrick Kennedy, Weil, Najor 1AC Hostilities with R2P advantage (Russia China war) and Japan advantage (Fusion good) 1NR-2NR Feminist Rage K |
Clay | 2 | Opponent: Cal SW | Judge: Roark 1AC Hostilities with advantages of R2P (Russia and India warFood) SOP (Preemption and Human Rights) and Warfighting (Power Projection and Alliances) 1NC 2NC 1NR 2NR |
Clay | 4 | Opponent: Kentucky GV | Judge: Brown, Nick 1AC Hostilities with advantages of R2P (famine and great power wars) SOP (preemption and human rights) and warfighting (power projection and alliances) 1NC 2NC 1NR 2NR |
Clay | 6 | Opponent: Wake MS | Judge: Barouch 1AC Hostilities (Same as Clay Round 2 and 4 thus its not posted) 1NC 2NC 1NR 2NR |
Clay | 7 | Opponent: USC PV | Judge: Revelins 1AC Hostilities with advantages of R2P (RussiaChina War and Famine) Warfighting (Power Projection and Migration) and SOP (Preemption and HR) All old and not reposted 1NC 2NC 1NR 2NR |
GSU | Doubles | Opponent: Wake HS | Judge: Cohn, Paul, Kall Wakes 1NC 1) Debt Ceiling (Economy !) 2) Executive Appointment CP 3) Courts CP 4) Iran DA (Iran Prolif!) 2NC 1) Iran 2) Case (Including Circumvention) 1NR 1) Politics 2NR 1) Politics and Case |
GSU | 2 | Opponent: Michigan CH | Judge: Severson 1AC Intervention (miscalc) Warfighting (power projection and alliancesfood) SOP (Korean war) 1NC = Executive Restraint CP (OLC Solicitor General mechanism) Prez Powers DA (terror impact) Debt Ceiling politics (losers lose link) Kritik (letting the government restrict its own authority still legitimizes the government - also some Nietzsche threads thrown in here) |
GSU | 4 | Opponent: Kentucky GV | Judge: Norris 1AC Intervention (miscalc) Warfighting (power projection and alliancessoft power) SOP (preemption and Human Rights) |
GSU | 5 | Opponent: Northwestern MV | Judge: Malsin 1AC Intervention (miscalc) Warfighting (power projection and alliancessoft power) SOP (Preemption and Human rights) 1NC = Kritik - here are the components |
GSU | 7 | Opponent: Georgetown AM | Judge: Hays Watson 1AC Intervention (miscalc) Warfighting (power projection and alliancessoft power) SOP (Preemption and Human rights) |
Harvard | 1 | Opponent: Wayne JS | Judge: Susko 1AC Hostilities (Point of Order) with Warfighting (Alliances and power projection) and UN (UN credibility AQIM terror gas war) 1NC 2NC 1NR 2NR |
Harvard | 5 | Opponent: Wake DL | Judge: Fitzmier 1AC Hostilities with R2P (Russia and China War) and India Relations (Space) 1NC 2NC 1NR 2NR |
Harvard | 8 | Opponent: OU CL | Judge: Kirk 1AC Hostilities with advantages of executive war (war) and drones (civilian deaths) 1NC |
Harvard | 3 | Opponent: Kansas BC | Judge: Hardy 1AC Same as Harvard Round 1 vs Wayne 1NC 1) T Contractors 2) T WPA 3) Concurrent Rez CP 4) CIR (Econ) 5) Syria Warfighting DA 2NC 1NR 2NR |
Indiana | 2 | Opponent: Indiana PS | Judge: Kelly, Casey 1AC Hostilities with Bush Doctrine Advantage (Space) R2P and Heuristics All already posted 1NC-2NR Ableism K and case |
Indiana | 3 | Opponent: Louisville LR | Judge: Frederick 1AC Hostilities It was the same version as Wake Round 3 1NC-2NR Non-Violence |
Indiana | 5 | Opponent: Iowa HK | Judge: Vats 1AC Hostilities Aff with Policy Trials mechanism UN advantage (Gas war and cred) Warfighting (heg) and Congressional leadership (treaties) 1NC 1) ESR CP 2) Iran Politics (Econ) 3) WPCA CP with moral hazard and IBC NBs 4) Case 2NC WPCA and Case 1NR DA and Case 2NR WPCA and case |
Indiana | 7 | Opponent: Michigan CP | Judge: Hingstman Hostilities 1AC with Point of Order mechanism and advantages of SOP (Human Rights and Preemption) China (War and relations) and warfighting (Heg) 1NC 1) Continuing Resolution CP 2) Nuclear PIC with deterrence NB 3) Iran Politics (Israel Strikes) 4) T Restrictions 5) Case 2NC CR CP and Case 1NR Politics and Case 2NR DA and case |
Indiana | Quarters | Opponent: Indiana HF | Judge: Kelly Young, Meloche, Casey Kelly 1AC Hostilities with point of order mechanism Advantages were SOP (HR and Preemption) Warfighting (Heg) and China (War and relations) 1NC 1) T restrictions 2) Fear of Death K 3) Case 2NC-2NR K and Case |
NDT | 7 | Opponent: NU MV | Judge: Susko, Layron, Hall 1AC use of force act advans sop japan miscalc |
Texas | 1 | Opponent: Wake DL | Judge: Cook 1AC Hostilities with new plan old R2P advantage (Russia-China war) and new fusion advantage (mining and milling bad) 1NC-2NR Rage K |
Texas | 3 | Opponent: Georgetown ErMc | Judge: Katsulas 1AC Hostilities aff with policy trials and point of order mechanism Advantages were China (SCSECS War and Relations) SOP (Preemption and HR) and Warfighting (Heg) 1NC 1) T Restrictions 2) Iran politics (strikes and Middle east war) 3) Prez powers DA (warming) 4) Case 2NC Case 1NR Politics 2NR DA and case |
Texas | 5 | Opponent: Houston LR | Judge: Abelkop, Adam 1AC Same as UK RR Round 6 vs Emory 1NC 1) Preemption PIC 2) Disclosure Good 3) Crip Time K 4) Ableism K 5) Redaction CP 2NC 1) Both Ks 2) Disclosure 1NR Clean-up on both and Redaction 2NR Disclosure Ableism and Redaction CP |
Texas | 7 | Opponent: Texas CM | Judge: Smelko 1AC Hostilities 1AC (Same as UK RR 6 or Texas 5) 1NC 1) Afro-Pessimism 2) Risk K 2NC Afro-Pessimism 1NR Risk 2NR Afro-Pessimism |
Texas | Doubles | Opponent: Emory JS | Judge: Gramzinski, Arnett, Walters 1AC Hostilities 1AC with policy trial mechanism Advantages were Sudan (landmines Africa war and Suez) SOP (NK war) and Warfighting (food and heg) 1NC 1) Rana K 2) Iran politics 3) OLC CP 2NC K 1NR Case 2NR K and Case |
UK RR | 2 | Opponent: Michigan AP | Judge: Hardy 1AC Intervention (miscalc) Warfighting (power projection and alliancessoft power) SOP (Preemption and Human rights) 2NC 1NR 2NR |
UK RR | 4 | Opponent: Kentucky GR | Judge: Green, Justin 1AC Intervention (miscalc) Warfighting (Heg AlliancesFood) SOP (EU Relations-Environment) 1NC 2NC 1NR 2NR |
UK RR | 6 | Opponent: Emory JS | Judge: Russell 1AC R2P (Famine Russia and India War) Warfighting (Heg AlliancesMigration) SOP (Central AsiaRussia) 1NC 2NC 1NR 2NR |
UK RR | 8 | Opponent: Oklahoma LM | Judge: Hall, Sherry 1AC Miscalc and Bush Doctrine (India Relations-Asteroids and UG99) 1NC 2NC 1NR 2NR |
USC | 2 | Opponent: Emory AB | Judge: Kallmyer 1AC- Hostilities General (R2P adv-see UK RR Round 6 and Congressional Leadership advantage with impacts of congress treaty power and environmental treaties) 1NC to 2NR- Rana K and case |
USC | 4 | Opponent: UNLV RV | Judge: Nikolic Iran Hostilities (Same as Wake 8 and Q) 1NC 1) T weapons 2) T authority 3) ESR with Congressional Greenlighting internal net benefits 4) Immigration Politics (India Relations) 5) Case with Iran Prolif Good 2NC CP and T weapons 1NR Politics and Case 2NR CP and internal Net benefits |
USC | 6 | Opponent: OU LW | Judge: Guevara, Omar 1AC Hostilities with Bush Doctrine (Impacts of Space and Indian AKI disease) and miscalc Same as versus OU at UK RR but with a new underview 1NC-2NR Nietzsche and security case |
USC | Doubles | Opponent: OU BC | Judge: Sarah Lundeen, Crowe, Severson 1AC Same Hostilities 1AC as versus Rutgers in Wake Round 3 1NC-2NR Wilderson |
USC | Octas | Opponent: Kansas BC | Judge: Nikolic, Warden, Kallmyer, Layton, Brovero 1AC NoKo Hostilities with NK advantage (Prolif regime collapse food via china relations) and Asia Pivot Advantage (pivot good global econ china econ heg) 1NC 1) T in means throughout 2) CIR (Econ) 3) QDR CP 4) Missile Defense PIC with Korean war internal NB 5) Case 2NC T and QDR 1NR CIR 2NR T |
Wake | 1 | Opponent: Wichita State MR | Judge: White, Janna 1AC Same as UK RR 6 vs Emory (R2P with RC war and famine Warfighting with migration and power projection and SOP with R war) 1NC 2NC 1NR 2NR |
Wake | 3 | Opponent: Rutgers RS | Judge: Harper, Allison Same Hostilities 1AC as Harvard round 8 with new passive voice plan and newish Heuristic page 1NC-2NR |
Wake | 6 | Opponent: Georgetown AM | Judge: Brossmann 1AC Hostilities with CMR Advantage (Pakistan Nigeria US Miscalc) and Warfighting (Alliance and Power Projection) 1NC |
Wake | 8 | Opponent: NU OP | Judge: Andres Gannon 1AC Iran Hostilities with Iran Prolif advantage (Prolif Middle East War Afghanistan Central Asia) and Congressional Leadership (Laundry List and Treaties) 1NC 1)T-Armed Forced 2)ESR CP 3) Iran Sanctions CP 4) Liberalism K 5) Farm Bill Politics 6) Warfighting DA 7) Executive Power good on case 2NR Case and Warfighting |
Wake | Quarters | Opponent: Northwestern MV | Judge: Seth Gannon, Kallmyer, Brovero, Weiner, Feldman 1AC Hostilities (Same as Wake 8) 1NC 1) T Single CountrySubstantialAuthority 2)Grab Bag Iran CP 3) Iran Reps K 4) Israel DA 5) Farm Bill DA (Brown-Food Security) 2NR Grab bag CP Israel DA Case |
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Entry | Date |
---|---|
2AC RD 7 2AC K SecurityTournament: NDT | Round: 7 | Opponent: NU MV | Judge: Susko, Layron, Hall Particularity Thesis – We can advance accurate and contingent "small-T" truth claims without linking to broader theorization.Reinalda ’4 Middle-range theories The discussion between rationalists and constructivists is not limited to substantive Link is methodologically flawed. Most recent scholarship shows Security reps WON’T cause magic support for Executive secrecy or control.Saksena ’11 There is no consensus among scholars about which frames will appeal most to the public (Note to students: the word "valence" means how something "resonates" – "positive valence" means intrinsic attraction… "negative valences" means "intrinsic aversiveness") Public Alt not trickle-up. Pressure NEVER PERCEIVED by the State as sustained.Saksena ’11 Reps K bad – assumes Representational Determinism. Prefer the particularized and surrounding context of HOW our reps were deployed.Shim ’14 Imagery can enact powerful effects, since political actors are almost always pressed to take Impact’s empirically false – tons of militarism without extinction. Case impact turns it faster. Environment’s also resilient.Gray 7—Director of the Centre for Strategic Studies and Professor of International Relations and Strategic Studies at the University of Reading, graduate of the Universities of Manchester and Oxford, Founder and Senior Associate to the National Institute for Public Policy, formerly with the International Institute for Strategic Studies and the Hudson Institute (Colin, July, "The Implications of Preemptive and Preventive War Doctrines: A Reconsideration", http://www.ciaonet.org/wps/ssi10561/ssi10561.pdf-http://www.ciaonet.org/wps/ssi10561/ssi10561.pdf) 7. A policy that favors preventive warfare expresses a futile quest for absolute security | 3/30/14 |
2AC RD 7 2AC T ProhibitTournament: NDT | Round: 7 | Opponent: NU MV | Judge: Susko, Layron, Hall "Restriction" means limitationMattice 7 (Harry S., Jr., United States District Judge, "Wright v. Magellan Behavioral Health, Inc.", 7-3, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48718, Lexis) In the instant case, the Court is required to interpret the word "restriction" as used by the parties in the Agreement. The parties apparently agree that the legal definition of restriction—"a limitation or qualification," Black’s Law Dictionary 1341 (8th ed. 1999)—is a good place to start. Thus, the Court must determine whether the board’s supervision requirement falls within this definition. | 3/30/14 |
ASPEC - 2AC - Texas DubsTournament: Texas | Round: Doubles | Opponent: Emory JS | Judge: Gramzinski, Arnett, Walters ( ) counter-def – USFG includes all three branches – but all three do not have to act in order to be topical.Absolute Astronomy ’9 The Federal Government of the United States is the central current reigning United States governmental | 2/10/14 |
Ableism K - 1AR - Indiana 2Tournament: Indiana | Round: 2 | Opponent: Indiana PS | Judge: Kelly, Casey A2: Ontology( ) Ontology not 1stJarvis 2K State BuenoExamples prove that claim’s too sweeping:Seligman ’11 Litigation as a tool for social change has a long and proud tradition in the Security( ) K’s of Security, Fear, and Exaggeration are all wrong. The better mistake’s to err with us.Kroenig ’12 Should we worry about the spread of nuclear weapons? At first glance, this PanThreats are real but provoked by the U.S. —- Pan agreesPan 4 (Chengxin, Lecturer in IR at Deakin University, Australia, Alternatives, 29:3, InfoTrac) For instance, as the United States presses ahead with a missile-defence shield Turns Civil SocietyK turns the case —- the culture of contest makes meaningful civil society impossibleKarlberg ’2 Political Implications Beyond these epistemological implications, partisan branding and partisan spectacle have a number | 1/25/14 |
Ableism K - 1AR - Texas 5Tournament: Texas | Round: 5 | Opponent: Houston LR | Judge: Abelkop, Adam A2: Johnson – Inclusion by ExclusionGoes aff – proves reformsYour cite "In the 1950s, blacks had their churches. Women had each other as | 2/9/14 |
Ableism K - 2AC - Indiana 2Tournament: Indiana | Round: 2 | Opponent: Indiana PS | Judge: Kelly, Casey Heuristic2AC – Stur, on underview pageExtend our 1AC Stuhr ev. K’s of Aff’s macro-political starting point don’t apply in the War Powers context. Neg’s anti-State and micro-1st stance fail. Stuhr’s next paragraph prove that WE DON’T EXCLUDE their framework – but perm’s the best option.Stuhr ’8 These and related experiences, rooted in a love of war, are not merely English( ) Our heuristic can meaningfully teach a lot within the debate space. Helps check fundamentalism of all stripes.English ’7 It is our position, however, that rather than acting as a cultural technology 2AC – 4 Layer FiatWe’re vertical constraint through the public sphere.Lobel ’89 These changes would supplement and ultimately transform traditional separation of power restraints. The constitutional Three – Awareness. We may spur macro-change. If we don’t, our Aff still boosts awareness. This beats framework distinctions by helping the debate-space adjust to Executive practice:Young – quoting Stewart – ’13 About six months ago, my assistant debate coaches and I decided that it would be a good idea to AND opinions will stand as an important potential check on the presidency. A2: Russia Threat Reps BadThreat’s real—-bias runs the opposite direction for RussiaBlank 5 – Stephen Blank, Professor at the Strategic Studies Institute at the U.S. Army War College, "Is Russia a Democracy and Does It Matter?", World Affairs, 167(3), Winter, Jstor Recently, several analysts have argued that Russia is "a normal country" just A2: China Threat Reps BadTheir K doesn’t apply—-the thesis of the advantage says the U.S. provokes conflict with China through overly aggressive foreign policy, not that China is intrinsically threatening—-this both denies the link because the context of our argument provides nuance that avoids sweeping claims about China and proves the alt reverses the error by falsely claiming that they can never contribute to violenceCallahan 5 – William A. Callahan, Professor of Politics at the University of Manchester, "How to Understand China: The Dangers and Opportunities of Being a Rising Power", Review of International Studies, 31 Although ’China threat theory’ is ascribed to the Cold War thinking of foreigners who Negative reps don’t spill over or shape policyWang 00 – Jianwi Wang, Postdoctoral Fellow at the East-West Center, Limited Adversaries: Post-Cold War Sino-American Mutual Images, p. 260-261 Under such ’structural uncertainty’, I would argue, studies of national perceptions become Threats are real but provoked by the U.S. —- Pan agreesPan 4 (Chengxin, Lecturer in IR at Deakin University, Australia, Alternatives, 29:3, InfoTrac) For instance, as the United States presses ahead with a missile-defence shield SOPSpace – AT: Asteroid Reps/Mellor K( ) Alt not solve, Neg offense exaggerated, and they make things worse.Ashworth ’10 ( ) Detection Turn:Deeper detection checks nuclear deflectionMuese ’6 Researchers at Sandia National Laboratories in New Mexico have used a supercomputer to model and Nuclear option net worse – huge impactSchweickart’ 4 Disability K – 2AC( ) In-Round focus turncalls for the ballot discourages community change on issues of oppression.Ritter ’13 The preceding discussion demonstrates why arguments about social change— even social change within the B - "the Ballot as currency" functions to discourage out-of-round community solutions.Ritter ’13 The fiction of social change through debate abuses the win—loss structure of debate ( ) Neg ballot doesn’t solve their framework’s broader goals.Ritter ’13 Many students who participate in comp etitive interscholastic debate in high school and college 20 ( ) Our starting point is better – macro-structures that we tackle necessarily shape micro-factors like the Debate community.Ebert ’5 ( ) Micro-political focus specifically flawed in the disability context.Davis ’7 The collection is as good as it gets in using Foucault in disability studies.¶ ( ) Their "scholarship" standard becomes academic religion – doesn’t guide a better world.Lake 11 These ?ve pathologies combine to divert professional debate from the substance of world politics to Isaac – Util/Ethics( ) No, not ethics disad – consequencesIssac, ’2 2AR – Liberal Power not bad (domestic)( ) All forms of control are not equal – Liberalism solves the worst excessesHeins ’5 | 1/25/14 |
Ableism K - 2AC - Texas 5Tournament: Texas | Round: 5 | Opponent: Houston LR | Judge: Abelkop, Adam Extend our 1AC Stuhr ev. K’s of Aff’s macro-political starting point don’t apply in the War Powers context. Stuhr’s next paragraph prove that WE DON’T EXCLUDE their framework – but combining our frameworks is the bestStuhr ’8 These and related experiences, rooted in a love of war, are not merely ( ) In-Round focus turncalls for the ballot discourages community change on issues of oppression.Ritter ’13 The preceding discussion demonstrates why arguments about social change— even social change within the B - "the Ballot as currency" functions to discourage out-of-round community solutions.Ritter ’13 The fiction of social change through debate abuses the win—loss structure of debate ( ) Neg ballot doesn’t solve their framework’s broader goals.Ritter ’13 Many students who participate in comp etitive interscholastic debate in high school and college 20 ( ) Our starting point is better – macro-structures that we tackle necessarily shape micro-factors like the Debate community.Ebert ’5 ( ) Micro-political focus specifically flawed in the disability context.Davis ’7 The collection is as good as it gets in using Foucault in disability studies.¶ ( ) The Breckenridge ev K’s is a double-turn. It K’s universals. We’re not that. Our particularity args are the anti-thesis of their K. They are – that’s our Haller arg.Breckenridge and Volger ’1 (Carol Appadurai and Candace A, "The Critical Limits of Embodiment: Disability’s Criticism", Public Culture, Volume 13, Number 3, Fall 2011) No one is ever more than temporarily able-bodied. This fact frightens those —————— their card ends here ——————————- Disability studies teaches that an assumed able body is crucial to the smooth operation of | 2/9/14 |
Afro-Pessimism K - 2AC - Texas 7Tournament: Texas | Round: 7 | Opponent: Texas CM | Judge: Smelko AfropessimismState not Always Racist – WallFraming point ~23 1 – Universal v. particularToo sweeping to say working-through-State never counters racism – here’s 7 concrete examples:Seligman ’11 Litigation as a tool for social change has a long and proud tradition in the Framing Point ~23 2 – How we engage:*Pessimism towards progressivism inverts the error and makes racism worse. This card rules:Jones ’99 An even more troubling feature of Adorno and Horkheimer’s analysis is the downplaying of individual A2: Positive Peace LinksIntervention directly kills which should be rejected —- and causes wider conflict that blocks positive peaceMiall ’99 (Hugh, Et Al., Reader in Peace and Conflict Research and Director of the Institute for Peace Studies - U Lancaster, Contemporary Conflict Resolution: The Prevention, Management, and Transformation of Deadly Conflicts p.222-3) We hope that this book has shown that the founders of the conflict resolution approach This turns the K —- more than they turn the caseGoldstein 1 – Josh Goldstein, Professor of Int’l Relations, American University, War and Gender, p. 412 First, peace activists face a dilemma in thinking about causes of war and working A-to RodriguezTheir Rodriguez article is NOT about abolition of the USFG – it’s about prison abolition. It DOES NOT contextualize.Here’s proof:Rodriguez ’10 Speaking more precisely to the concerns raised by this issue of Radical Teacher, the Rodriguez clarifies that this definition of "abolition" is taken from the organization "Critical Resistance"Rodriguez ’10 The "prison industrial complex," in contrast to the prison regime, names the This clarifies Critical Resistance’s mission:Critical Resistance.Org Critical Resistance seeks to build an international movement to end the prison industrial complex ( Slavery Trivialization( ) Reject this slavery comparison. It’s not accurate and violently displaces a specific kind of evilWanzo ’9 Slavery stands in U.S. history not only as an acknowledged evil, ( ) Analogy alone’s a turn – minimizes a contextual and specific suffering.Bouie ’13 Chattel slavery stands apart in American history. It was unlike anything else in the Reception TheoryReception theory double-bind – either reps don’t cause reality or critics can’t explain their non-dominant readingKraus ’89 | 2/9/14 |
CIR DA - 1AR - USC 4Tournament: USC | Round: 4 | Opponent: UNLV RV | Judge: Nikolic Latin America WarNo South American war —-GeographyStratfor, 08 ("Geography and Conflict in South America" 3-6) Geography has led most practitioners of geopolitics to neglect or ignore South America. No Ext – Obama Supports PlanObama supports Iran restrictionsCorsi 13 – Jerome R. Corsi, PhD in Government from Harvard University, "Senator Obama Would Impeach President Obama", Before Its News, 8-31, http://beforeitsnews.com/obama/2013/08/senator-obama-would-impeach-president-obama-2455116.html On Dec. 20, 2007, then-Sen. Obama was asked by Especially nowBailey 10-9 – Nicole Bailey, Editor at Town Hall, "Another War? New Bill to Authorize Military Force Against Iran", Town Hall, 2013, http://townhall.com/tipsheet/nicolebailey/2013/10/09/another-war-new-bill-to-authorize-military-force-against-iran-n1720216 A bill attempting to authorize the use of America’s full military force against Iran is Ext. Debt Ceiling Thumper – CIRDebt ceiling thumps and top aidesThe opposite view is held by a longtime Democratic Congressional aide who insists that the Ext. Minimum Wage/Unemployment ThumperMinimum wage and unemployment T of the DNational Review, 1-1-2014 http://www.nationalreview.com/article/367333/obamas-2014-war-poor-michael-tanner-http://www.nationalreview.com/article/367333/obamas-2014-war-poor-michael-tanner Both the Obama administration and the Democratic leadership in Congress have announced that their top priority when Congress returns later this month will be extending unemployment benefits and raising the minimum wage. Both policies are likely to leave more Americans jobless — especially low-income workers with few skills, the very people Democrats claim they want to help most. AT: Impact – IndiaRelations won’t collapse over Visa policy New York’s Democrat senator Charles Schumer calls Infosys a ’chop shop’. The US GEORGE FERNANDES, Defense Minister, India: Well, I don’t think they should | 1/4/14 |
CIR DA - 2AC - USC 4Tournament: USC | Round: 4 | Opponent: UNLV RV | Judge: Nikolic Iran-specific restrictions are popularPolitico 7 – "Congressmen to Require Authorization of Force Against Iran", 1-29, http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0107/2530.html Concerned about the way the Bush administration moved against Iraq, a group of congressmen Obama supports itKramer 13 – Kramer 9/17/13 http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2013/09/17/israel-likes-its-u-s-presidents-strong-2/-http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2013/09/17/israel-likes-its-u-s-presidents-strong-2/ Martin Kramer is President of Shalem College, a new undergraduate liberal arts college in Jerusalem. An authority on contemporary Islam and Arab politics, Kramer earned his undergraduate and doctoral degrees in Near Eastern Studies from Princeton University. During a twenty-five-year academic career at Tel Aviv University, he directed the Moshe Dayan Center for Middle Eastern and African Studies. Kramer has taught as a visiting professor at Brandeis University, the University of Chicago, Cornell University, Georgetown University, and The Johns Hopkins University (SAIS). He has served as a visiting fellow at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars in Washington, The Washington Institute for Near East Policy, and Harvard University’s Olin Institute for Strategic Studies. "Too big for business as usual" In light of this history, it’s Iran fights nowCBS News, 12-31-2013 http://www.cbsnews.com/news/can-democrats-overcome-obamacare-in-2014/-http://www.cbsnews.com/news/can-democrats-overcome-obamacare-in-2014/ Problems at home aside, 2014 is a year where Mr. Obama’s foreign policy carries big risks with potentially big payoffs. His negotiators are still working to fashion a long-term deal to scale back Iran’s nuclear program after coming to a six-month interim agreement. Still, lawmakers – including Democrats – are threatening to impose additional sanctions, which could undermine an agreement.¶ Then there’s Syria, where a civil war rages on that presents serious risks if the U.S. should get involved. Al Qaeda and other extremists have joined the forces fighting against President Bashar Assad’s authoritarian government, which could present a complicated mess if they take over the country. The U.S. was recently forced to suspend aid to Syria in December after extremist rebel groups captured a warehouse that contained U.S. supplies intended to reach moderate rebels.¶ Negotiating these challenges presents yet another minefield for a president who has his hands full at home.Obama will horse-trade restrictions for his agendaMcGinnis 93 – John O. McGinnis, Assistant Professor at the Cardozo School of Law and Former Deputy Assistant Attorney General in the Office of Legal Counsel, Department of Justice, "Constitutional Review by the Executive in Foreign Affairs and War Powers: A Consequence of Rational Choice in the Separation of Powers", Law and Contemporary Problems, 56(4), p. 322-324 C. Bargaining in Foreign Policy Areas Where the Accommodation Reflects Congress’s Predominant Interest Shortly PC not keyAndres 10 (Gary, Vice Chair of Policy and Research – Dutko Worldwide and Columnist – Weekly Standard, Quotes George C. Edwards III, Professor of Political Science – Texas A26M University, "Obama and Legislative Power", 7-22, http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/obama-and-legislative-power-http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/obama-and-legislative-power) Obama PC fails on CIR- GOP doesn’t trustReid Epstein, Politico, 11-10-2013 http://www.politico.com/story/2013/11/white-house-seeks-gop-immigration-help-99640.html-http://www.politico.com/story/2013/11/white-house-seeks-gop-immigration-help-99640.html White House press secretary Jay Carney said recently that it’s long been established that the Comprehensive has ZERO chance in the HouseGlobal Post, 12-20-2013 www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/afp/131220/obama-holds-out-hope-immigration-reform-2014-http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/afp/131220/obama-holds-out-hope-immigration-reform-2014 Last June the Senate passed the most comprehensive rewrite of US immigration laws in a CIR, unemployment, debt ceiling, minimum wage, healthcare, Guantanmo and election thump the DAThe last vestiges of 2013’s political wrangling officially behind him, President Barack Obama is US-India relations resilient- CIR not enough to spilloverDesai 12 Fellow, Truman National Security Project (Ronak. "US-India Relations under the 2nd obama administration." http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ronak-d-desai/usindia-relations-under-t_b_2115396.html-http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ronak-d-desai/usindia-relations-under-t_b_2115396.html) No chance of conflictKumar, 13 (Sanjay – correspondent for The Diplomat, "Pakistan’s Elections: A Harbinger of Peace on the Subcontinent?", The Diplomat, http://thediplomat.com/the-pulse/2013/05/16/pakistans-elections-a-harbinger-of-peace-on-the-subcontinent/-http://thediplomat.com/the-pulse/2013/05/16/pakistans-elections-a-harbinger-of-peace-on-the-subcontinent/) | 1/4/14 |
CIR DA - 2AC - Wake 1Tournament: Wake | Round: 1 | Opponent: Wichita State MR | Judge: White, Janna CIR is deadBut according to Steven Camarota, director of research at the Center for Immigration Studies Political capital doesn’t exist and isn’t key to their DAHirsch, 13 (Michael Hirsch, chief correspondent for National Journal. He also contributes to 2012 Decoded-http://decoded.nationaljournal.com/contributors/michael-hirsh. Hirsh previously served as the senior editor and national economics correspondent for Newsweek, based in its Washington bureau. He was also Newsweek’s Washington web editor and authored a weekly column for Newsweek.com, "The World from Washington." Earlier on, he was Newsweek’s foreign editor, guiding its award-winning coverage of the September 11 attacks and the war on terror. He has done on-the-ground reporting in Iraq, Afghanistan, and other places around the world, and served as the Tokyo-based Asia Bureau Chief for Institutional Investor from 1992 to 1994. http://www.nationaljournal.com/magazine/there-s-no-such-thing-as-political-capital-20130207-http://www.nationaljournal.com/magazine/there-s-no-such-thing-as-political-capital-20130207) On Tuesday, in his State of the Union address, President Obama will do Farm Bill, CIR and budget thump the DAAndy, Fubank, Hoosier Ag Today, 11-10-2013 http://www.hoosieragtoday.com/farm-bill-at-top-of-presidents-idea-list-in-new-orleans/-http://www.hoosieragtoday.com/farm-bill-at-top-of-presidents-idea-list-in-new-orleans/ Speaking on the economy in New Orleans Friday – President Barack Obama again addressed three For years, one of the groups pushing hardest for immigration reform has been the U.S. food industry. AND isn’t realistic," he says. "It assumes that there’s a willingness to keep doing farm work on the other side of the border. And that’s already dropping off." Ag industry strong and resilient I would like to welcome everyone to this year’s 89th annual Agricultural Outlook Forum. Despite a historic drought affecting much of U.S. agriculture, the U.S. agricultural economy is strong and, in aggregate, farm incomes are near record highs. U.S. agricultural exports are expected to break records again this fiscal year and the financial outlook for the sector remains solid, with debt measures low relative to assets and equity, and asset values at record levels. Most Americans could not care less if farming and ranching disappear, as long as But no one would dispute that the American economy is more dynamic and resilient than | 11/16/13 |
CIR DA - 2AC - Wake 6Tournament: Wake | Round: 6 | Opponent: Georgetown AM | Judge: Brossmann CIR is deadIBT, 11-12-2013 http://www.ibtimes.com/why-immigration-reform-may-or-may-not-die-2013-1466644-http://www.ibtimes.com/why-immigration-reform-may-or-may-not-die-2013-1466644 Reform fails to solve HSW - would restrict student visasTiger 8 (Joseph, J.D. Candidate – Georgetown University Law Center, "Re-Bending the Paperclip: An Examination of America’s Policy Regarding Skilled Workers and Student Visas", Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, Spring, 22 Geo. Immigr. L.J. 507, Lexis) Farm Bill and the budget thump the DAAndy, Fubank, Hoosier Ag Today, 11-10-2013 http://www.hoosieragtoday.com/farm-bill-at-top-of-presidents-idea-list-in-new-orleans/-http://www.hoosieragtoday.com/farm-bill-at-top-of-presidents-idea-list-in-new-orleans/ Speaking on the economy in New Orleans Friday – President Barack Obama again addressed three Climate change, health care flaws and nominations thump the DAPresident Obama, fresh off a trouncing of congressional Republicans over the government shutdown, Economy AND economic heg are both resilientEdelman, 10 (Eric S. Edelman 10, former Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, was Principal Deputy Assistant to the Vice President for National Security Affairs, 2010, "Understanding America’s Contested Primacy," Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments) Morgenthau talks about national morale and character as key elements of national power; characteristics Huge bipartisan support for the planGelb 5 – Leslie H. Gelb, President Emeritus of the Council on Foreign Relations and Anne-Marie Slaughter, Dean of the Woodrow Wilson School of International and Public Affairs, "Declare War", The Atlantic, 11-1, http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2005/11/declare-war/304301/?single_page=true Passing this legislation might not be easy. But the time is right. Liberals | 11/21/13 |
CIR Politics - 2AC - Harvard 1Tournament: Harvard | Round: 1 | Opponent: Wayne JS | Judge: Susko CIR wont’ pass- shutdown hurt Obama, no popular support, no PCGarth Kant is WND Washington news editor. Previously, he spent five years writing, copy-editing and producing at "CNN Headline News," three years writing, copy-editing and training writers at MSNBC, and also served several local TV newsrooms as producer, executive producer and assistant news director President Obama won the shutdown showdown and now has the upper hand in advancing his Not pushingNow that a temporary solution to the partial government shutdown and debt limit are at Political capital doesn’t exist and isn’t key to their DA- more likely winners winHirsch, 13 (Michael Hirsch, chief correspondent for National Journal. He also contributes to 2012 Decoded-http://decoded.nationaljournal.com/contributors/michael-hirsh. Hirsh previously served as the senior editor and national economics correspondent for Newsweek, based in its Washington bureau. He was also Newsweek’s Washington web editor and authored a weekly column for Newsweek.com, "The World from Washington." Earlier on, he was Newsweek’s foreign editor, guiding its award-winning coverage of the September 11 attacks and the war on terror. He has done on-the-ground reporting in Iraq, Afghanistan, and other places around the world, and served as the Tokyo-based Asia Bureau Chief for Institutional Investor from 1992 to 1994. http://www.nationaljournal.com/magazine/there-s-no-such-thing-as-political-capital-20130207-http://www.nationaljournal.com/magazine/there-s-no-such-thing-as-political-capital-20130207) On Tuesday, in his State of the Union address, President Obama will do AT: Impact – High Skilled WorkersVisas inevitable regardless of PC Of the major policy issues under discussion in Washington, "immigration reform" stands Reform fails to solve- would restrict student visasTiger 8 (Joseph, J.D. Candidate – Georgetown University Law Center, "Re-Bending the Paperclip: An Examination of America’s Policy Regarding Skilled Workers and Student Visas", Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, Spring, 22 Geo. Immigr. L.J. 507, Lexis) No solvency- increasing skilled workers trades-off with effectivenessWasem 10 (Ruth Ellen, Specialist in Immigration Policy – Congressional Research Service, "U.S. Immigration Policy on Permanent Admissions", CRS Report, 4-1, http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?art icle=172926context=key_workplace) Substantial efforts to reform legal immigration have failed in the recent past, prompting some 2AC WunderThumper 1Budget, farm bill and immigration thump the DAPresident Obama said Thursday morning that his top three priorities for the rest of the No SpilloverNo agenda and issues are disconnected—spillover is merely GOP red herringsBrian Beutler, Salon staff writer, 9/9/13, GOP’s massive new lie: The truth about Obama’s second term , www.salon.com/2013/09/09/syria_wont_derail_obamas_second_term_house_republicans_will/ Political reporters have a weakness for narratives, and the narrative of a weakened president | 10/26/13 |
CIR Politics - 2AC - Harvard 3Tournament: Harvard | Round: 3 | Opponent: Kansas BC | Judge: Hardy CIR wont’ pass- shutdown hurt Obama, no popular support, no PCGarth Kant is WND Washington news editor. Previously, he spent five years writing, copy-editing and producing at "CNN Headline News," three years writing, copy-editing and training writers at MSNBC, and also served several local TV newsrooms as producer, executive producer and assistant news director President Obama won the shutdown showdown and now has the upper hand in advancing his No time and econ issues thump- conclusion of your articleEvan McMorris-Santoro BuzzFeed Staff , 10-15-2013 http://www.buzzfeed.com/evanmcsan/obama-has-already-won-the-shutdown-fight-and-hes-coming-for-http://www.buzzfeed.com/evanmcsan/obama-has-already-won-the-shutdown-fight-and-hes-coming-for Sharry said immigration reform advocates have sketched out a calendar that has them pushing the Political capital doesn’t exist and isn’t key to their DA- more likely winners winHirsch, 13 (Michael Hirsch, chief correspondent for National Journal. He also contributes to 2012 Decoded-http://decoded.nationaljournal.com/contributors/michael-hirsh. Hirsh previously served as the senior editor and national economics correspondent for Newsweek, based in its Washington bureau. He was also Newsweek’s Washington web editor and authored a weekly column for Newsweek.com, "The World from Washington." Earlier on, he was Newsweek’s foreign editor, guiding its award-winning coverage of the September 11 attacks and the war on terror. He has done on-the-ground reporting in Iraq, Afghanistan, and other places around the world, and served as the Tokyo-based Asia Bureau Chief for Institutional Investor from 1992 to 1994. http://www.nationaljournal.com/magazine/there-s-no-such-thing-as-political-capital-20130207-http://www.nationaljournal.com/magazine/there-s-no-such-thing-as-political-capital-20130207) On Tuesday, in his State of the Union address, President Obama will do No signing statement and no impactAmira 9 – Dan Amira, Reporter at NY Mag, "Obama Won’t Abuse His Signing Statements Like Some People", New York Magazine, http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2009/03/obama_wont_abuse_his_signing_s.html President Obama issued a directive yesterday that all his predecessors’ signing statements — namely, Budget and farm bill thumpPresident Obama said Thursday morning that his top three priorities for the rest of the Of the major policy issues under discussion in Washington, "immigration reform" stands Reform fails to solve- would restrict student visasTiger 8 (Joseph, J.D. Candidate – Georgetown University Law Center, "Re-Bending the Paperclip: An Examination of America’s Policy Regarding Skilled Workers and Student Visas", Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, Spring, 22 Geo. Immigr. L.J. 507, Lexis) No solvency- increasing skilled workers trades-off with effectivenessWasem 10 (Ruth Ellen, Specialist in Immigration Policy – Congressional Research Service, "U.S. Immigration Policy on Permanent Admissions", CRS Report, 4-1, http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?art icle=172926context=key_workplace) Substantial efforts to reform legal immigration have failed in the recent past, prompting some Doesn’t solve econ– immigration impact negligibleSteve Malanga is a Contributing Editor to City Journal and a Senior Fellow at the Manhattan Institute., Summer 2006, How Unskilled Immigrants Hurt Our Economy, http://www.city-journal.org/html/16_3_immigrants_economy.html-http://www.city-journal.org/html/16_3_immigrants_economy.html As foreign competition and mechanization shrink manufacturing and farmworker jobs, low-skilled immigrants US econ resilientRobert Johnson 1/19/13 (CFA, director of economic analysis with Morningstar, Morningstar.com, "U.S. Economy Not So Fragile After All" http://news.morningstar.com/articlenet/article.aspx?id=581616) No, the U.S. Economy Has Not Been Fragile After All¶ No impactBarnett 9 (Thomas, Senior Strategic Researcher – Naval War College, "The New Rules: Security Remains Stable Amid Financial Crisis", Asset Protection Network, 8-25, http://www.aprodex.com/the-new-rules—security-remains-stable-amid-financial-crisis-398-bl.aspx) When the global financial crisis struck roughly a year ago, the blogosphere was ablaze | 11/5/13 |
Case - 1AR - GSU Round 2Tournament: GSU | Round: 2 | Opponent: Michigan CH | Judge: Severson SOPA2: GreenThey’ll regulateMcManus 13 – Doyle McManus, Washington Bureau Chief of the Los Angeles Times, MA and Fullbright Scholar at the University of Brussels, Four-Time Winner of the National Press Club’s Edwin Hood Award for Reporting on U.S. Foreign Policy, Winner of Georgetown University’s Weintal Prize, and#34;In America, Not Isolationism But Skepticismand#34;, Los Angeles Times, 9-15, http://www.latimes.com/opinion/commentary/la-oe-mcmanus-column-congress-obama-and-syria-20130915,0,3944454.column Opposition in Congress to a presidential request to use force has a long history. | 10/4/13 |
Case - 1AR - Harvard 3Tournament: Harvard | Round: 3 | Opponent: Kansas BC | Judge: Hardy Case TurnsEU soft power resilientKundnani and Dennison, 13 (Hans Kundnani – editorial director at the European Council on Foreign Relations 26 Susi Dennison – policy fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations, 3/11, "Europe’s Resilient but Mediocre Foreign Policy", Real Clear World, http://www.realclearworld.com/articles/2013/03/11/europes_resilient_but_mediocre_foreign_policy_100606.html) Europe’s foreign-policy resilience Although Europe’s image and soft power may have continued to Alt causes to EU soft power—Lagendijk, 13 (Joost Lagendijk – Senior Advisor at the Istanbul Policy Center of Sabanc? University and former member of the European Parliament, 5/13, "Europe: Soft Power Is No Power", Huffington Post, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/joost-lagendijk/soft-power-is-no-power_b_3262338.html) It would be an understatement to say the European Union is going through difficult times A2: Must "Declare" War"Authorization"’s good enough—-consensus opinionMinda 7 – Gary Minda, Professor of Law at the Brooklyn Law School, "Congressional Authorization and Deauthorization of War: Lessons from the Vietnam War", The Wayne Law Review, Fall, 53 Wayne L. Rev. 943, Lexis No one argues today that Congress should return to a practice of commencing war by | 11/5/13 |
Case - 2AC - Clay 6Tournament: Clay | Round: 6 | Opponent: Wake MS | Judge: Barouch Diplomatic LeveragePreemption ruins U.S. diplomatic leverage —- risks escalationWheeler 3 – Nicholas J. Wheeler, Professor of International Relations and Director of the Institute for Conflict, Cooperation, and Security at the University of Birmingham, "The Bush Doctrine: The Dangers of American Exceptionalism in a Revolutionary Age", Asian Perspective, 27(4), p. 201 India’s belief, for example, that Pakistan is complicit in terrorist attacks against Indian ChechnyaPreemption causes Russian strikes on ChechnyaEfron 2 – Efron 26 Williams ’02 Many Europeans fear the Bush doctrine could encourage Russia to claim a similar right to Goes nuclearBlank 2 (Stephen, Professor of National Security – U.S. Army War College, "Putin’s Twelve-Step Program", Washington Quarterly, p. 149-150) The absence of effective democratic control over the army, together with the military’s obsession Yes Indo PakPreemption dissolves normal checksDaalder 2 The doctrine of preemption is also strategically imprudent. If taken seriously by others, | 10/6/13 |
Case - 2AC - Harvard 3Tournament: Harvard | Round: 3 | Opponent: Kansas BC | Judge: Hardy UN’s key to the global economySawa 3 – Takamitsu Sawa, Professor of Economics, Kyoto University and Director of the University’s Institute of Economic Research, 5/5/2003 (The Japan Times) p. lexis The U.S. financial industry, which reaped handsome profits through economic unilateralism | 11/5/13 |
Case - 2AC - Harvard 5Tournament: Harvard | Round: 5 | Opponent: Wake DL | Judge: Fitzmier FiatTwo – We’re vertical constraint through the public sphere.Lobel ’89 These changes would supplement and ultimately transform traditional separation of power restraints. The constitutional Three – Awareness. We may spur macro-change. If we don’t, our Aff still boosts awareness. This beats framework distinctions by helping the debate-space adjust to Executive practice:Young – quoting Stewart – ’13 About six months ago, my assistant debate coaches and I decided that it would be a good idea to craft a justification paper to persuade the NDT-CEDA college policy debate community to AND Even if "fiat’s not real", and Affs don’t control levers of power today, we advance a heuristic. Without this heuristic of fiat, we’ll re-enforce dangerous nihilism.Hoff ’6 There is no question that helping educational leadership students become self-analytical and reflect Serial Policy Failure wrong and Policy Nihilism Bad.Tallis ’97 If we deny or rubbish the progress that mankind has already made, and at Overview Effect extension( ) And, travel key to Overview Effect.White ’87 ( ) Specifically key to solve gendered violence.Hearsey ’12 The Overview Effect¶ Humans’ perceptions of their surroundings determine much of their behavior. Space – KirbyAsteroid Reps good. History proves they mobilize civil, not imperial, responses Indeed, many advisors perceive fictional film as a way to promote their science in R2P solves Gender( ) Plan specifically checks gendered violence.Harrington ’92 This is where the appeal of international organization is strong: form transnational institutions that | 11/5/13 |
Case - 2AC - Harvard 8Tournament: Harvard | Round: 8 | Opponent: OU CL | Judge: Kirk Heuristic2AC Passive Voice( ) Defense – solves K’s of the State.Hester ’13 "The USFG should..." should no longer be unproblematically accepted as the starting point State not Always Racist – WallAnd, meaningful reformism now – disproves sweeping claim.Farber ’98 Framing Point ~23 2 – How we engage:*Pessimism towards progressivism inverts the error and makes racism worse. This card rules:Jones ’99 An even more troubling feature of Adorno and Horkheimer’s analysis is the downplaying of individual Framing Point ~23 3 – No bright lineEven total abolition could be always be spun as reformist. They don’t fully escape their K of reformism and set-back meaningful immediate progress.Heiner ’3 2AC – Four Layer FiatTwo – We’re vertical constraint through the public sphere.Lobel ’89 These changes would supplement and ultimately transform traditional separation of power restraints. The constitutional Three – Awareness. We may spur macro-change. If we don’t, our Aff still boosts awareness. This beats framework distinctions by helping the debate-space adjust to Executive practice:Young – quoting Stewart – ’13 About six months ago, my assistant debate coaches and I decided that it would be a good idea to craft a justification paper to persuade the NDT-CEDA college policy debate community to AND Advantages2AC – Add-on RacismUnless POTUS authority declines via the Aff, racist interventions will increase.Grynaviski ’13 Second, this conception rightly focuses us outward, rather than inward. The current 2AC Graham extensionTheir framework CAN’T solve urban oppression. It rejects fiat and non-local theorization. This ignores macro-origins which shape the local more than vice-versa.Ebert ’5 Our violent urbanism disad to their framework. They start with this room – rejecting fiat about the distant or abroad. That cements violence. Perm’s best.Graham ’10 The book aims in particular to unite two very different, and usually separate, | 11/5/13 |
Case - 2AC Cards - GSU DoublesTournament: GSU | Round: Doubles | Opponent: Wake HS | Judge: Cohn, Paul, Kall Increases political costs and solves signal regardlessWilkinson 12 – Will Wilkinson, Research Fellow at the Cato Institute, M.A. in Philosophy from the Northern Illinois University, Academic Coordinator of the Social Change Project and the Global Prosperity Initiative at The Mercatus Center at George Mason University, "Rebridling the Executive", Economist, 4-17, http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2012/04/democracy-and-war I think this is good, sound sense. Fabio Rojas, a professor of sociology at Indiana University, disagrees. The sorts of rules that Self-interest and normative pressurePildes 12 – Richard H. Pildes, Sudler Family Professor of Constitutional Law at the NYU School of Law and Co-Director of the NYU Center on Law and Security, "Book Review: Law and the President", Harvard Law Review, April, 125 Harv. L. Rev. 1381, Lexis For these reasons, I want to move beyond empirical issues and engage Posner and Large risk of India/Pakistan nuclear conflict – deterrence postures unstable now.Narang 10 – Vipin Narang, Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Government at Harvard University and a research fellow at Harvard’s Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Winter 2009/2010, International Security, Lexis Academic Of the three nuclear postures adopted in South Asia since the late 1980s, only | 9/29/13 |
Case - 2AC Cards - GSU Round 2Tournament: GSU | Round: 2 | Opponent: Michigan CH | Judge: Severson NK WarYes NK war – threat is realFitzsimmons 6 (Michael, Defense Analyst, and#34;The Problem of Uncertainty in Strategic Planningand#34;, Survival, 48(4), December) At one level it is difficult to contest the basis for these claims. Who Pre-Emptive WarConflict’s likely in Taiwan, Georgia, and India/Pakistan —- U.S. signal’s keyRehman 12 – Fehzan Rehman, International Relations at the University of Westminster, and#34;Analyzing America’s National Security Strategyand#34;, e-International Relations, 9-13, http://www.e-ir.info/2012/09/13/analyzing-americas-national-security-strategy/ Another implication on sovereignty, due to the NSS, was, yet again, A2: Circumvention (General) – 2ACIncreases political costs and solves signal regardlessWilkinson 12 – Will Wilkinson, Research Fellow at the Cato Institute, M.A. in Philosophy from the Northern Illinois University, Academic Coordinator of the Social Change Project and the Global Prosperity Initiative at The Mercatus Center at George Mason University, and#34;Rebridling the Executiveand#34;, Economist, 4-17, http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2012/04/democracy-and-war I think this is good, sound sense. Fabio Rojas, a professor of sociology at Indiana University, disagrees. and#34;~T~he sorts of rules that | 10/4/13 |
Case - 2AC Cards - GSU Round 7Tournament: GSU | Round: 7 | Opponent: Georgetown AM | Judge: Hays Watson Modeling – PreemptionNorms of use of force are powerful and shaped by the U.S. —- and preemption crushes diplomatic leverage, causing global nuclear warKhan 5 – Tahir Khan, Brigadier in the Pakistan Army, and#34;Doctrine of Preemption: Analysis and Implications for South Asiaand#34;, USAWC Strategy Research Project, 3-2, http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA433669 RISKS ATTACHED TO THE DOCTRINE Khan 5 – Tahir Khan, Brigadier in the Pakistan Army, and#34;Doctrine of Preemption: Analysis and Implications for South Asiaand#34;, USAWC Strategy Research Project, 3-2, http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA433669 This doctrine of unilateral pre-emption is a radical departure from the purposes and Excess Presidential power causes aggressive preemptionFincher 3 – Charles Pugsley Fincher, October 26, 2003, http://www.thadeusandweez.com/cam03/10.26.03..html The United States Congress has gone missing. Before the rise of the and#34;imperial Causes regional conflict in South Asia, Taiwan, and KoreaFetzer 2 – FETZER, PROF EMERITUS – UNIV OF MINNESOTA DULUTH, 2 A policy of preemption is not only morally corrupt but inherently destabilizing. As I Israel Strike 2ACPre-emption justifies Israeli attack on Iran—kills US credDunn, 7 (David Hastings – Senior Lecturer in the Department of Political Science and International Studies at the University of Birmingham, and#34;’Real men want to go to Tehran’: Bush, pre-emption and the Iranian nuclear challengeand#34;, International Affairs 83.1, http://www.diplomatie.gouv.fr/fr/IMG/pdf/iranpreemption.pdf) If not America, then what about an Israeli military strike against Iran? Again Israel Strike – A2: Impact Defense*Israel/Iran war is the most deadly extinction scenario—experts, Iran geography, climate, buildings, population density, advanced Israeli nuclear weapons and delivery systems, miscalc
In those first minutes, they’ll be stunned. Eyes fixed in a thousand- A2: Heg Turns – GeneralLack of prior participation causes interference in duration and conduct of warBarron 8 – David J. Barron, Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and Martin S. Lederman, Visiting Professor of Law at the Georgetown University Law Center, and#34;The Commander in Chief at the Lowest Ebb — A Constitutional Historyand#34;, Harvard Law Review, February, 121 Harv. L. Rev. 941, Lexis By the conclusion of the Clinton Administration, however, it appeared that something of Trade-off’s zero-sum and accesses the turn moreBarron 8 – David J. Barron, Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and Martin S. Lederman, Visiting Professor of Law at the Georgetown University Law Center, and#34;The Commander in Chief at the Lowest Ebb — A Constitutional Historyand#34;, Harvard Law Review, February, 121 Harv. L. Rev. 941, Lexis In a companion Article, we described many of the structural forces responsible for this Congress knows better —- they’ll only stop bad warsKoh 6 – Harold Koh, Professor of International Law at Yale Law School and Former Assistant Secretary of State for Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, and#34;Setting the World Rightand#34;, The Yale Law Journal, 115 Yale L.J. 2350, Lexis Remarkably, the authors suggest that recent setbacks in the Iraq War support their case Executive power is fallible and prone to miscalculation —- impact is global nuclear warAdler 11 – David Gray Adler, Professor of Political Science at the University of Idaho, and#34;Presidential Ascendancy in Foreign Affairs and the Subversion of the Constitutionand#34;, Presented to the German-American Conference on and#34;Comparisons of Parliamentary and Coordinated Power (Presidential) Systemsand#34;, 3-8, http://www.civiced.org/pdfs/GermanAmericanConf2011/Adler.pdf A considerable literature urges executive supremacy, and extols the supposed virtues of presidential assertion If opposition is strong, they’ll tube military effectiveness by acting behind the scenesSomin 7 – Ilya Somin, Professor of Law at George Mason University School of Law, and#34;Can Presidents Wage War Without Congressional Support?and#34;, Volokh Conspiracy, 9-13, http://www.volokh.com/archives/archive_2007_09_09-2007_09_15.shtml~~231189716517 I disagree. In fact, it is very difficult for a president to either initiate or continue a military conflict without fairly strong congressional backing. And the evidence of the last 60 years proves it. History disproves the DABarron 8 – David J. Barron, Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and Martin S. Lederman, Visiting Professor of Law at the Georgetown University Law Center, and#34;The Commander in Chief at the Lowest Ebb — A Constitutional Historyand#34;, Harvard Law Review, February, 121 Harv. L. Rev. 941, Lexis At the same time, the history we have reviewed casts doubt on the functionalist Executive retains non-binding influence over Congress —- solves the linkBarron 8 – David J. Barron, Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and Martin S. Lederman, Visiting Professor of Law at the Georgetown University Law Center, and#34;The Commander in Chief at the Lowest Ebb — A Constitutional Historyand#34;, Harvard Law Review, February, 121 Harv. L. Rev. 941, Lexis Insofar as such a Commander in Chief nevertheless concludes that the existing constraints are harmful | 10/4/13 |
Case - A2 Executive Treaty Power Good - 2AC - Wake 8Tournament: Wake | Round: 8 | Opponent: NU OP | Judge: Andres Gannon input stops abrupt changes that ruin leadershipSabis 2 – Christopher C. Sabis, JD from Georgetown University Law Center, "Congress and the Treaty Power: An Originalist Argument Against Unilateral Presidential Termination of the ABM Treaty", Denver Journal of International Law and Policy, Winter, 31 Denv. J. Int’l L. 26 Pol’y 223, Lexis Giving the President unilateral power to withdraw from a treaty gives exclusive power to terminate | 12/14/13 |
Case - A2 Heg Bad - 2AC - Wake 1Tournament: Wake | Round: 1 | Opponent: Wichita State MR | Judge: White, Janna Heg Bad – 2ACIntervention’s inevitable —- plan stops bad onesMead 9 (Walter Russell, Senior Fellow for U.S. Foreign Policy – Council on Foreign Relations, American Interest, http://www.the-american-interest.com/ai2/article.cfm?Id=33426MId=16) Barry Posen puts his fingers on some of the classic and enduring tensions in American Weak heg is worse —- invites aggression, causes miscalc, and doesn’t deterFeaver 3 (Peter D., Professor of Political Science – Duke University, Armed Services: Agency, Oversight, and Civil-Military Relations, p. 213) The civil-military problematique is a simple paradox: The very institution created to Collapse causes re-intervention and nuclear war —- turns their impactsHirsch 3 (Michael, Senior Editor – Washington Bureau, At War With Ourselves, p. 10-11) | 11/16/13 |
Case - A2 Iran Prolif Good - 2AC - USC 4Tournament: USC | Round: 4 | Opponent: UNLV RV | Judge: Nikolic Iranian nuclearization causes Israeli preemptive strikes –destabilizes the region.Brom 5 – Brom, Senior Research Associate at the Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies, 05 (Shlomo, October, "Getting Ready for a Nuclear Ready Iran", http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pdffiles/pub629.pdf) Other scholars argue that Israel is more prone to launch preventive strikes against other proliferators | 1/4/14 |
Case - A2 R2P Good - 2AC - Clay 4Tournament: Clay | Round: 4 | Opponent: Kentucky GV | Judge: Brown, Nick No impact—-UN failsPerle 3 – Richard, Chair of the Defense Policy Board, The Guardian, 3-21, Lexis But is the security council capable of ensuring order and saving us from anarchy? UN cred’s tanked nowTillawi 11 – Hesham, Host of the Current Issues TV Program, "No Credibility Left for UN", Press TV, 9-22, http://presstv.com/detail/200556.html The United Nations days are over and the world needs a new organization that really Sequestration thumpsThe United States risks losing influence on the world stage as sequestration threatens to once | 10/6/13 |
Case - A2 R2P and Prolif Good - 1AR -Wake 1Tournament: Wake | Round: 1 | Opponent: Wichita State MR | Judge: White, Janna Mideast deterrence uniquely fails—-prolif causes nuclear warInbar 6 – Efraim Inbar, Professor of Political Science at Bar-Ilan University, Director at Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies, March, 2006, The Need to Block a Nuclear Iran, The Middle East Review of International Affairs, Vol. 10, No. 1, Article 7, p. http://meria.idc.ac.il/journal/2006/issue1/jv10no1a7.html The Iranian nuclear threat is also to be taken seriously in light of the difficulties Even slow prolif triggers our impactRussell 6 – Richard, November/December, Research associate in Georgetown University’s Institute for the Study of Diplomacy and professor in Georgetown’s Security Studies Program. "Military Planning for a Middle East Stockpiled with Nuclear Weapons," Military Review, http://usacac.leavenworth.army.mil/CAC/milreview/English/NovDec06/bob.pdf-http://usacac.leavenworth.army.mil/CAC/milreview/English/NovDec06/bob.pdf How would the Middle East be affected by numerous states armed with nuclear weapons? | 11/16/13 |
Case - A2 R2P and Prolif Good - 2AC -Wake 1Tournament: Wake | Round: 1 | Opponent: Wichita State MR | Judge: White, Janna But the standard answers don’t really take us very far into this problem any more AT: Waltz - Increases SecurityWaltz is wrong – his example over-generalizes, proliferation hurts global security Does this mean that nuclear proliferation will stabilize international relations, reducing the chances of | 11/16/13 |
Case - CMR - 2AC - Wake 6Tournament: Wake | Round: 6 | Opponent: Georgetown AM | Judge: Brossmann CMR – A2: Alt CausesTheir cards describe civil-military conflicts – those are inevitable – only the plan stops them from spiralingCimbala 12 As Dale R. Herspring notes in Chapter 2, scholars working on civil- CMR – Joint Training Solves Global CMRUS programs are key to promoting CMR around the worldDesch 1996 ~Michael C., Assistance prof @ Harvard University, Civil Military Relations and Demcracy~ The book concludes with an epilogue by Joseph S. Nye Jr., based on CMR – Impact – Nigeria – Yes EscalationEscalates – US will get drawn inLubeck et al 2007 (Paul Lubeck, professor of sociology at the University of California, Santa Cruz, Ronnie D. Lipschutz, professor of politics at the University of California, Santa Cruz, Michael Watts, director of African Studies at the University of California, Berkeley, "CONVERGENT INTERESTS: U.S. Energy Security and the"Securing" of Nigerian Democracy," International Policy Report, February, http://www.ciponline.org/NIGERIA_FINAL.pdf) In this brief, we have marshaled evidence confirming the scale of mission creep into Georgetown CMR DA – 2ACWe control uniqueness—-structural decline now—-plan can’t make it worseZenko 9-25-13 Washington has found itself in a crisis over the proper relationship between senior civilian and We solve public perception of civilian control – outweighs their internal linkWong, 8 (leonard, research professor of military strategy in the strategic studies institute at the u.s. army war college, "civil-military relations in a post-9/11 world", strategic studies institute, p. 3-4) Concluding Thoughts. The conference ended with some integrating observations. One noted that the Links – Fourth Gen Warfare4th Gen warfare is garbageKhan, 10 (Amos – MSc. in Strategic Studies from the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies – Nanyang Technological University and research analyst with the US Research Programme at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies – Nanyang Technological University, 10/14, "A Response to Fourth Generation Warfare", S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Working Papers) Conclusion Hammes and van Creveld ignore important continuities in military thought and their theories suffer | 11/21/13 |
Case - Japan Addon - 2AC - Indiana 3Tournament: Indiana | Round: 3 | Opponent: Louisville LR | Judge: Frederick Japan – 2ACJapan models the plan—-solves miscalcMartin 12 – Craig Martin, Associate Professor of Law at the Washburn University School of Law, and Frequent Visiting Lecturer at Osaka University Graduate School of Law and Politics, "Why Japan should Amend Its War-Renouncing Article 9", Japan Times, 8-4, http://www.japantimes.co.jp/opinion/2012/08/04/opinion/why-japan-should-amend-its-war-renouncing-article-9/~~23.UsXSSdKIySo Even more important, a new paragraph three would establish explicit requirements that the Diet Japanese miscalc causes extinctionBaker 12 – Kevin Robert, Political Analyst, "What Would Happen If China and Japan Went To War?", 9-17, http://appreviews4u.com/2012/09/17/what-would-happen-if-china-and-japan-went-to-war/ So could this island dispute spark off a full blown war? Well, if | 1/25/14 |
Case - Preemption Addon - 2AC - Indiana 3Tournament: Indiana | Round: 3 | Opponent: Louisville LR | Judge: Frederick SteinbergPreemption ruins U.S. leverage to deescalate regional crises —- goes nuclearSteinberg 2 – James B. Steinberg, Vice President and Director of Foreign Policy at the Brookings Institution, Michael E. O’Hanlon and Susan E. Rice, "The New National Security Strategy and Preemption", Brookings Policy Brief Series, December, http://www.brookings.edu/research/papers/2002/12/terrorism-ohanlon The Dangers of Legitimating Preemption A final concern relates to the impact of the precedent | 1/25/14 |
Case - R2P Addon - 2AC - Indiana 3Tournament: Indiana | Round: 3 | Opponent: Louisville LR | Judge: Frederick R2P – 2ACPlan stops R2PHanania 12 – Richard Hanania, JD Candidate at the University of Chicago Law School and Writer at The Atlantic, "Humanitarian Intervention and the War Powers Debate", The Journal Jurisprudence, (2012) J. JURIS 47, http://www.jurisprudence.com.au/juris13/Hanania.pdf What we see is a public that is generally indifferent to foreign affairs, but Congress will block every humanitarian interventionHanania 12 – Richard Hanania, JD Candidate at the University of Chicago Law School and Writer at The Atlantic, "Humanitarian Intervention and the War Powers Debate", The Journal Jurisprudence, (2012) J. JURIS 47, http://www.jurisprudence.com.au/juris13/Hanania.pdf What the interventionists must realize, however, is that without the ability of the Global nuclear warTrombly 11 – Dan Trombly, Ph.D Candidate in International Relations at George Washington University, "The Upending of Sovereignty", 8-27, http://slouchingcolumbia.wordpress.com/2011/08/27/the-upending-of-sovereignty/ The other, truly potent danger of this new set of norms is that it | 1/25/14 |
Case - UN Cred Addon - Texas 3Tournament: Texas | Round: 3 | Opponent: Georgetown ErMc | Judge: Katsulas Plan’s key to UN legitimacyMcGuinness 9 – Margaret E. McGuinness, Associate Professor at the University of Missouri Law School, "The President, Congress and The Security Council: Counterterrorism And The Use Of Force Through The Internationalist Lens", Willamette Law Review, 45 Willamette L. Rev. 417, Spring, Lexis A. The Value of More Explicit Ex Ante Congressional Involvement in U.S ExtinctionTharoor 3 – Shashi Tharoor, Indian Minister of State for Human Resource Development, Member of Parliament, PhD. from The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University, Foreign Affairs, September / October, http://www.cfr.org/world/why-america-still-needs-united-nations/p7567 BEYOND LIMITS What about the Security Council’s structural deficiencies? For all the carping about | 2/8/14 |
Circumvention - 1AR - Clay 4Tournament: Clay | Round: 4 | Opponent: Kentucky GV | Judge: Brown, Nick CircumventionOfficials think Congress has enforcement power —- they’ll self-restrainCole 11 – David Cole, Professor at the Georgetown University Law Center, "Where Liberty Lies: Civil Society and Individual Rights After 9/11", The Wayne Law Review, Winter, 57 Wayne L. Rev. 1203, Lexis In my view, Posner and Vermeule simultaneously underestimate the constraining force of law and No definitions argBacevich 13 – Andrew, Professor of History and International Relations at Boston University and Ph.D. in American Diplomatic History from Princeton University, The New American Militarism, p. 209-210 An essential step toward curbing the new American militarism is to redress this imbalance in Overcomes barriers —- forces Court enforcementSpiro 93 – Peter J. Spiro, Associate Professor of Law at Hofstra University, "Book Review: War Powers And The Sirens Of Formalism", New York University Law Review, December, 68 N.Y.U.L. Rev. 1338, Lexis STATUTORY RIGIDITIES AND BAD AURAS Ely sees in the Resolution’s failure a political expedience " | 10/6/13 |
Circumvention - 1AR - Clay 7Tournament: Clay | Round: 7 | Opponent: USC PV | Judge: Revelins Plan’s a broad definition that covers almost all uses of forceBacevich 13 – Andrew, Professor of History and International Relations at Boston University and Ph.D. in American Diplomatic History from Princeton University, The New American Militarism, p. 209-210 An essential step toward curbing the new American militarism is to redress this imbalance in Courts go affSchonberg 4 – Karl K. Schonberg, Assistant Professor of Government at St. Lawrence University, "Global Security and Legal Restraint: Reconsidering War Powers after September 11", Political Science, 119(1), p. 138-139 But if the WPR will not provide a fruitful avenue for future congressional challenges to | 11/5/13 |
Circumvention - 1AR - Harvard 1Tournament: Harvard | Round: 1 | Opponent: Wayne JS | Judge: Susko Avoids Circumvention – 1AROur mechanism makes restrictions effectiveMitchell 9 – Jonathan, Assistant Professor of Law at the George Mason University School of Law, "Legislating Clear-Statement Regimes in National-Security Law", Georgia Law Review, Summer, 43 Ga. L. Rev. 1059, Lexis Conclusion Congress will frequently legislate clear-statement requirements in its national security legislation. Overcomes justiceability barriersFranck 89 – Thomas M. Franck, Professor of Law at New York University, "Distribution of Constitutional Authority: Rethinking War Powers: By Law or by "Thaumaturgic Invocation"?", American Journal of International Law, October, 83 A.J.I.L. 766, Lexis Reliance on the courts is not Congress’s only means to enforce the law and rebut | 10/26/13 |
Circumvention - 1AR - Indiana 5Tournament: Indiana | Round: 5 | Opponent: Iowa HK | Judge: Vats 1ar EvidenceAll of their evidence is descriptive of the status quo and the WPR – only our evidence makes the comparative claim that policy trials overcome current compliance issuesBuchanan 13(Bruce, professor of government at the University of Texas Austin, "Presidential Power and Accountability Toward a Presidential Accountability System") A2: Circumvention – Executive InterpretationPlan’s a broad definition that covers almost all uses of forceBacevich 13 – Andrew, Professor of History and International Relations at Boston University and Ph.D. in American Diplomatic History from Princeton University, The New American Militarism, p. 209-210 An essential step toward curbing the new American militarism is to redress this imbalance in No work-aroundsHuq 12 – Aziz Z. Huq, Assistant Professor of Law at the University of Chicago Law School, "Review: Binding the Executive (by Law or by Politics)", University of Chicago Law Review, 79 U. Chi. L. Rev. 777, Spring, Lexis Alternatively, perhaps the Neustadt and Skowronek accounts can be explained solely in terms of A2: Circumvention – Executive Interpretation (Offensive / Defensive Distinction)"Defensive" exemption is narrow and defined in law—-it’s a precise loophole that won’t be circumventedSkaggs 8 – David Skaggs, Co-Chair of The War Powers Committee at The Constitution Project, "Congressional Perspective On War Powers", CQ Congressional Testimony, 3-13, Lexis I would like to cut to the chase. That is this. Except in A2: Circumvention (General) – 1ARAnd – legacy costsAckerman 13 – Bruce Ackerman, Sterling Professor of Law at Yale Law School, "Oversight Now", Foreign Policy, 6-11, http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2013/06/11/oversight_now_FISA_executive_congress?page=full Partisans of the status quo will claim that a serious congressional effort will only make | 1/26/14 |
Circumvention - 1AR - UK RR 2Tournament: UK RR | Round: 2 | Opponent: Michigan AP | Judge: Hardy No work-aroundsHuq 12 – Aziz Z. Huq, Assistant Professor of Law at the University of Chicago Law School, "Review: Binding the Executive (by Law or by Politics)", University of Chicago Law Review, 79 U. Chi. L. Rev. 777, Spring, Lexis Alternatively, perhaps the Neustadt and Skowronek accounts can be explained solely in terms of | 10/4/13 |
Circumvention - 1AR - UK RR 4Tournament: UK RR | Round: 4 | Opponent: Kentucky GR | Judge: Green, Justin A2: Circumvention (General) – 1ARAnd – legacy costsAckerman 13 – Bruce Ackerman, Sterling Professor of Law at Yale Law School, "Oversight Now", Foreign Policy, 6-11, http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2013/06/11/oversight_now_FISA_executive_congress?page=full Partisans of the status quo will claim that a serious congressional effort will only make A2: Circumvention (General) – 1AR – A2: Rational Choice TheoryNormative force outweighs pure rational calculations and ensures complianceHuq 12 – Aziz Z. Huq, Assistant Professor of Law at the University of Chicago Law School, "Review: Binding the Executive (by Law or by Politics)", University of Chicago Law Review, 79 U. Chi. L. Rev. 777, Spring, Lexis B. The Motivational Status of Law D. But why should Presidents attend to A2: Circumvention (General) – 1AR – Signal IndependentSymbol’s independent of effectWolff 8 – Dj Wolff, Summer Associate at the Center for Strategic and International Studies and JD Candidate at Stanford Law School, "Should the Next President Advocate Replacing the War Powers Resolution?", World Politics Review, 8-12, http://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/articles/2558/should-the-next-president-advocate-replacing-the-war-powers-resolution Nevertheless, the WPCA can still serve a strong symbolic function. The Bush presidency A2: Circumvention – Courts Decline – StandingNo standing barrierHahn 1 – Michael Hahn, JD from Georgetown University Law Center and MPP from Georgetown Public Policy Institute, "The Conflict in Kosovo: A Constitutional War?", Georgetown Law Journal, 89 Geo. L.J. 2351, July, Lexis The Campbell courts argue that if Congress passes measures that directly oppose the President’s initiation A2: Circumvention – Congress Won’t Stop Use of Force – 1ARCongress won’t approve forceBerman 13 – Daniel Berman, Ph.D. Candidate in History at the London School of Economics, MAs at the University of St. Andrews and the London School of Economics, BA at Bates College, Writer for Fivethirtyeight.com, World-Outline, Dale26CO, and The American, "Syria, Congress, and Obama: The changing partisan contours of American foreign policy", The World Outline, 9-6, http://theworldoutline.com/2013/09/syria-congress-obama-changing-partisan-contours-american-foreign-policy/ As a consequence, the decision to seek congressional approval made political sense for Obama | 10/4/13 |
Circumvention - 1AR - USC 2Tournament: USC | Round: 2 | Opponent: Emory AB | Judge: Kallmyer A2: Circumvention (General) – 1AR – Signal IndependentSymbol’s independent of effectWolff 8 – Dj Wolff, Summer Associate at the Center for Strategic and International Studies and JD Candidate at Stanford Law School, "Should the Next President Advocate Replacing the War Powers Resolution?", World Politics Review, 8-12, http://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/articles/2558/should-the-next-president-advocate-replacing-the-war-powers-resolution Nevertheless, the WPCA can still serve a strong symbolic function. The Bush presidency A2: Circumvention – Congress Won’t Stop Use of Force – 2ACThey’ll regulateMcManus 13 – Doyle McManus, Washington Bureau Chief of the Los Angeles Times, MA and Fullbright Scholar at the University of Brussels, Four-Time Winner of the National Press Club’s Edwin Hood Award for Reporting on U.S. Foreign Policy, Winner of Georgetown University’s Weintal Prize, "In America, Not Isolationism But Skepticism", Los Angeles Times, 9-15, http://www.latimes.com/opinion/commentary/la-oe-mcmanus-column-congress-obama-and-syria-20130915,0,3944454.column Opposition in Congress to a presidential request to use force has a long history. Deters Executive overreachCole 11 – David Cole, Professor at the Georgetown University Law Center, "Where Liberty Lies: Civil Society and Individual Rights After 9/11", The Wayne Law Review, Winter, 57 Wayne L. Rev. 1203, Lexis In my view, Posner and Vermeule simultaneously underestimate the constraining force of law and | 1/3/14 |
Circumvention - 1AR - Wake 1Tournament: Wake | Round: 1 | Opponent: Wichita State MR | Judge: White, Janna They’ll regulateMcManus 13 – Doyle McManus, Washington Bureau Chief of the Los Angeles Times, MA and Fullbright Scholar at the University of Brussels, Four-Time Winner of the National Press Club’s Edwin Hood Award for Reporting on U.S. Foreign Policy, Winner of Georgetown University’s Weintal Prize, "In America, Not Isolationism But Skepticism", Los Angeles Times, 9-15, http://www.latimes.com/opinion/commentary/la-oe-mcmanus-column-congress-obama-and-syria-20130915,0,3944454.column Opposition in Congress to a presidential request to use force has a long history. | 11/16/13 |
Circumvention - 1AR - Wake 6Tournament: Wake | Round: 6 | Opponent: Georgetown AM | Judge: Brossmann Sign StatementsObama won’t do it and follow-on oversight solvesEvans 13 – Kevin Evans, Assistant Professor in the Department of Politics and International Relations at Florida International University, "Why the Obama Administration Has Issued Fewer Signing Statements", Miller Center, 2-4, http://millercenter.org/blog/obama-administration-signing-statements-evans A signing statement is written commentary on a bill that is being signed into law DefPlan’s a broad definition that covers almost all uses of forceBacevich 13 – Andrew, Professor of History and International Relations at Boston University and Ph.D. in American Diplomatic History from Princeton University, The New American Militarism, p. 209-210 An essential step toward curbing the new American militarism is to redress this imbalance in SignalIncreases political costs and solves signal regardlessWilkinson 12 – Will Wilkinson, Research Fellow at the Cato Institute, M.A. in Philosophy from the Northern Illinois University, Academic Coordinator of the Social Change Project and the Global Prosperity Initiative at The Mercatus Center at George Mason University, "Rebridling the Executive", Economist, 4-17, http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2012/04/democracy-and-war I think this is good, sound sense. Fabio Rojas, a professor of | 11/21/13 |
Circumvention - 2AC - CSUF 3Tournament: CSUF | Round: 3 | Opponent: Michigan KK | Judge: Gannon, Seth A2: Circumvention (General) – 2ACSelf-interest and normative pressurePildes 12 – Richard H. Pildes, Sudler Family Professor of Constitutional Law at the NYU School of Law and Co-Director of the NYU Center on Law and Security, "Book Review: Law and the President", Harvard Law Review, April, 125 Harv. L. Rev. 1381, Lexis III. The Incomplete Consequentialist Theory for the Role of Law For these reasons, And – legacy costsAckerman 13 – Bruce Ackerman, Sterling Professor of Law at Yale Law School, "Oversight Now", Foreign Policy, 6-11, http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2013/06/11/oversight_now_FISA_executive_congress?page=full Partisans of the status quo will claim that a serious congressional effort will only make Outweighs Executive reluctanceBarron 8 – David J. Barron, Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and Martin S. Lederman, Visiting Professor of Law at the Georgetown University Law Center, "The Commander in Chief at the Lowest Ebb — A Constitutional History", Harvard Law Review, February, 121 Harv. L. Rev. 941, Lexis Perhaps even more importantly, with one possible and equivocal exception during the Fillmore Administration Plan’s a broad definition that covers almost all uses of forceBacevich 13 – Andrew, Professor of History and International Relations at Boston University and Ph.D. in American Diplomatic History from Princeton University, The New American Militarism, p. 209-210 An essential step toward curbing the new American militarism is to redress this imbalance in | 1/7/14 |
Circumvention - 2AC - Clay 2Tournament: Clay | Round: 2 | Opponent: Cal SW | Judge: Roark Overcomes barriers —- forces Court enforcementSpiro 93 – Peter J. Spiro, Associate Professor of Law at Hofstra University, "Book Review: War Powers And The Sirens Of Formalism", New York University Law Review, December, 68 N.Y.U.L. Rev. 1338, Lexis STATUTORY RIGIDITIES AND BAD AURAS Ely sees in the Resolution’s failure a political expedience " Public pressure kicks in first and solvesHahn 1 – Michael Hahn, JD from Georgetown University Law Center and MPP from Georgetown Public Policy Institute, "The Conflict in Kosovo: A Constitutional War?", Georgetown Law Journal, 89 Geo. L.J. 2351, July, Lexis How should the war power be restored to the legislative branch of government? One | 10/5/13 |
Circumvention - 2AC - Clay 4Tournament: Clay | Round: 4 | Opponent: Kentucky GV | Judge: Brown, Nick Symbol’s independent of effectWolff 8 – Dj Wolff, Summer Associate at the Center for Strategic and International Studies and JD Candidate at Stanford Law School, "Should the Next President Advocate Replacing the War Powers Resolution?", World Politics Review, 8-12, http://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/articles/2558/should-the-next-president-advocate-replacing-the-war-powers-resolution Nevertheless, the WPCA can still serve a strong symbolic function. The Bush presidency | 10/6/13 |
Circumvention - 2AC - Clay 6Tournament: Clay | Round: 6 | Opponent: Wake MS | Judge: Barouch Increases political costs and solves signal regardlessWilkinson 12 – Will Wilkinson, Research Fellow at the Cato Institute, M.A. in Philosophy from the Northern Illinois University, Academic Coordinator of the Social Change Project and the Global Prosperity Initiative at The Mercatus Center at George Mason University, "Rebridling the Executive", Economist, 4-17, http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2012/04/democracy-and-war I think this is good, sound sense. Fabio Rojas, a professor of Self-interest and normative pressurePildes 12 – Richard H. Pildes, Sudler Family Professor of Constitutional Law at the NYU School of Law and Co-Director of the NYU Center on Law and Security, "Book Review: Law and the President", Harvard Law Review, April, 125 Harv. L. Rev. 1381, Lexis III. The Incomplete Consequentialist Theory for the Role of Law For these reasons, And – legacy costsAckerman 13 – Bruce Ackerman, Sterling Professor of Law at Yale Law School, "Oversight Now", Foreign Policy, 6-11, http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2013/06/11/oversight_now_FISA_executive_congress?page=full Partisans of the status quo will claim that a serious congressional effort will only make Outweighs Executive reluctanceBarron 8 – David J. Barron, Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and Martin S. Lederman, Visiting Professor of Law at the Georgetown University Law Center, "The Commander in Chief at the Lowest Ebb — A Constitutional History", Harvard Law Review, February, 121 Harv. L. Rev. 941, Lexis Perhaps even more importantly, with one possible and equivocal exception during the Fillmore Administration | 10/6/13 |
Circumvention - 2AC - Clay 7Tournament: Clay | Round: 7 | Opponent: USC PV | Judge: Revelins Increases political costs and solves signal regardlessWilkinson 12 – Will Wilkinson, Research Fellow at the Cato Institute, M.A. in Philosophy from the Northern Illinois University, Academic Coordinator of the Social Change Project and the Global Prosperity Initiative at The Mercatus Center at George Mason University, "Rebridling the Executive", Economist, 4-17, http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2012/04/democracy-and-war I think this is good, sound sense. Fabio Rojas, a professor of Self-interest and normative pressurePildes 12 – Richard H. Pildes, Sudler Family Professor of Constitutional Law at the NYU School of Law and Co-Director of the NYU Center on Law and Security, "Book Review: Law and the President", Harvard Law Review, April, 125 Harv. L. Rev. 1381, Lexis III. The Incomplete Consequentialist Theory for the Role of Law For these reasons, And – legacy costsAckerman 13 – Bruce Ackerman, Sterling Professor of Law at Yale Law School, "Oversight Now", Foreign Policy, 6-11, http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2013/06/11/oversight_now_FISA_executive_congress?page=full Partisans of the status quo will claim that a serious congressional effort will only make Outweighs Executive reluctanceBarron 8 – David J. Barron, Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and Martin S. Lederman, Visiting Professor of Law at the Georgetown University Law Center, "The Commander in Chief at the Lowest Ebb — A Constitutional History", Harvard Law Review, February, 121 Harv. L. Rev. 941, Lexis Perhaps even more importantly, with one possible and equivocal exception during the Fillmore Administration Symbol’s independent of effectWolff 8 – Dj Wolff, Summer Associate at the Center for Strategic and International Studies and JD Candidate at Stanford Law School, "Should the Next President Advocate Replacing the War Powers Resolution?", World Politics Review, 8-12, http://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/articles/2558/should-the-next-president-advocate-replacing-the-war-powers-resolution Nevertheless, the WPCA can still serve a strong symbolic function. The Bush presidency | 11/5/13 |
Circumvention - 2AC - Harvard 1Tournament: Harvard | Round: 1 | Opponent: Wayne JS | Judge: Susko It’s effectiveMitchell 9 – Jonathan, Assistant Professor of Law at the George Mason University School of Law, "Legislating Clear-Statement Regimes in National-Security Law", Georgia Law Review, Summer, 43 Ga. L. Rev. 1059, Lexis All of this has spurred proposals to strengthen the clear-statement regimes in Congress’s | 10/26/13 |
Circumvention - 2AC - Indiana 5Tournament: Indiana | Round: 5 | Opponent: Iowa HK | Judge: Vats Avoids failings of our old planBuchanan 8 – Bruce Buchanan, Professor of Government at the University of Texas at Austin, "Presidential Accountability for Wars of Choice", Issues in Governance Studies, Number 22, December, http://www.brookings.edu/~~/media/research/files/papers/2008/12/3020war20buchanan/1230_war_buchanan.pdf This paper focuses on how Congress and the American people evaluate presidential wars of choice Self-interest and normative pressurePildes 12 – Richard H. Pildes, Sudler Family Professor of Constitutional Law at the NYU School of Law and Co-Director of the NYU Center on Law and Security, "Book Review: Law and the President", Harvard Law Review, April, 125 Harv. L. Rev. 1381, Lexis III. The Incomplete Consequentialist Theory for the Role of Law For these reasons, | 1/26/14 |
Circumvention - 2AC - UK RR 2Tournament: UK RR | Round: 2 | Opponent: Michigan AP | Judge: Hardy Plan’s a broad definition that covers almost all uses of forceBacevich 13 – Andrew, Professor of History and International Relations at Boston University and Ph.D. in American Diplomatic History from Princeton University, The New American Militarism, p. 209-210 An essential step toward curbing the new American militarism is to redress this imbalance in No work-aroundsHuq 12 – Aziz Z. Huq, Assistant Professor of Law at the University of Chicago Law School, and#34;Review: Binding the Executive (by Law or by Politics)and#34;, University of Chicago Law Review, 79 U. Chi. L. Rev. 777, Spring, Lexis Alternatively, perhaps the Neustadt and Skowronek accounts can be explained solely in terms of Courts won’t allow itKossop 9 – Nancy Kassop, Professor of Political Science at the State University of New York at New Paltz, Debating the Presidency: Conflicting Perspectives on the American Executive, Ed. Ellis and Nelson, Google Books In summary, presidents have grabbed Congress’s war power for themselves; Congress has not | 10/4/13 |
Circumvention - 2AC - UK RR 4Tournament: UK RR | Round: 4 | Opponent: Kentucky GR | Judge: Green, Justin Increases political costs and solves signal regardlessWilkinson 12 – Will Wilkinson, Research Fellow at the Cato Institute, M.A. in Philosophy from the Northern Illinois University, Academic Coordinator of the Social Change Project and the Global Prosperity Initiative at The Mercatus Center at George Mason University, "Rebridling the Executive", Economist, 4-17, http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2012/04/democracy-and-war I think this is good, sound sense. Fabio Rojas, a professor of Self-interest and normative pressurePildes 12 – Richard H. Pildes, Sudler Family Professor of Constitutional Law at the NYU School of Law and Co-Director of the NYU Center on Law and Security, "Book Review: Law and the President", Harvard Law Review, April, 125 Harv. L. Rev. 1381, Lexis III. The Incomplete Consequentialist Theory for the Role of Law For these reasons, | 10/4/13 |
Circumvention - 2AC - UK RR 8Tournament: UK RR | Round: 8 | Opponent: Oklahoma LM | Judge: Hall, Sherry A2: Circumvention (General) – 2ACIncreases political costs and solves signal regardlessWilkinson 12 – Will Wilkinson, Research Fellow at the Cato Institute, M.A. in Philosophy from the Northern Illinois University, Academic Coordinator of the Social Change Project and the Global Prosperity Initiative at The Mercatus Center at George Mason University, "Rebridling the Executive", Economist, 4-17, http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2012/04/democracy-and-war I think this is good, sound sense. Fabio Rojas, a professor of Self-interest and normative pressurePildes 12 – Richard H. Pildes, Sudler Family Professor of Constitutional Law at the NYU School of Law and Co-Director of the NYU Center on Law and Security, "Book Review: Law and the President", Harvard Law Review, April, 125 Harv. L. Rev. 1381, Lexis III. The Incomplete Consequentialist Theory for the Role of Law For these reasons, Overcomes barriers —- forces Court enforcementSpiro 93 – Peter J. Spiro, Associate Professor of Law at Hofstra University, "Book Review: War Powers And The Sirens Of Formalism", New York University Law Review, December, 68 N.Y.U.L. Rev. 1338, Lexis STATUTORY RIGIDITIES AND BAD AURAS Ely sees in the Resolution’s failure a political expedience " They’ll regulateMcManus 13 – Doyle McManus, Washington Bureau Chief of the Los Angeles Times, MA and Fullbright Scholar at the University of Brussels, Four-Time Winner of the National Press Club’s Edwin Hood Award for Reporting on U.S. Foreign Policy, Winner of Georgetown University’s Weintal Prize, "In America, Not Isolationism But Skepticism", Los Angeles Times, 9-15, http://www.latimes.com/opinion/commentary/la-oe-mcmanus-column-congress-obama-and-syria-20130915,0,3944454.column Opposition in Congress to a presidential request to use force has a long history. Plan’s a broad definition that covers almost all uses of forceBacevich 13 – Andrew, Professor of History and International Relations at Boston University and Ph.D. in American Diplomatic History from Princeton University, The New American Militarism, p. 209-210 An essential step toward curbing the new American militarism is to redress this imbalance in | 10/4/13 |
Circumvention - 2AC - USC 2Tournament: USC | Round: 2 | Opponent: Emory AB | Judge: Kallmyer Self-interest and normative pressurePildes 12 – Richard H. Pildes, Sudler Family Professor of Constitutional Law at the NYU School of Law and Co-Director of the NYU Center on Law and Security, "Book Review: Law and the President", Harvard Law Review, April, 125 Harv. L. Rev. 1381, Lexis III. The Incomplete Consequentialist Theory for the Role of Law For these reasons, And – legacy costsAckerman 13 – Bruce Ackerman, Sterling Professor of Law at Yale Law School, "Oversight Now", Foreign Policy, 6-11, http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2013/06/11/oversight_now_FISA_executive_congress?page=full Partisans of the status quo will claim that a serious congressional effort will only make Outweighs Executive reluctanceBarron 8 – David J. Barron, Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and Martin S. Lederman, Visiting Professor of Law at the Georgetown University Law Center, "The Commander in Chief at the Lowest Ebb — A Constitutional History", Harvard Law Review, February, 121 Harv. L. Rev. 941, Lexis Perhaps even more importantly, with one possible and equivocal exception during the Fillmore Administration | 1/3/14 |
Circumvention - 2AC - USC 6Tournament: USC | Round: 6 | Opponent: OU LW | Judge: Guevara, Omar Increases political costs and solves signal regardlessWilkinson 12 – Will Wilkinson, Research Fellow at the Cato Institute, M.A. in Philosophy from the Northern Illinois University, Academic Coordinator of the Social Change Project and the Global Prosperity Initiative at The Mercatus Center at George Mason University, "Rebridling the Executive", Economist, 4-17, http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2012/04/democracy-and-war I think this is good, sound sense. Fabio Rojas, a professor of Self-interest and normative pressurePildes 12 – Richard H. Pildes, Sudler Family Professor of Constitutional Law at the NYU School of Law and Co-Director of the NYU Center on Law and Security, "Book Review: Law and the President", Harvard Law Review, April, 125 Harv. L. Rev. 1381, Lexis III. The Incomplete Consequentialist Theory for the Role of Law For these reasons, They’ll regulateMcManus 13 – Doyle McManus, Washington Bureau Chief of the Los Angeles Times, MA and Fullbright Scholar at the University of Brussels, Four-Time Winner of the National Press Club’s Edwin Hood Award for Reporting on U.S. Foreign Policy, Winner of Georgetown University’s Weintal Prize, "In America, Not Isolationism But Skepticism", Los Angeles Times, 9-15, http://www.latimes.com/opinion/commentary/la-oe-mcmanus-column-congress-obama-and-syria-20130915,0,3944454.column Opposition in Congress to a presidential request to use force has a long history. | 1/4/14 |
Circumvention - 2AC - Wake 6Tournament: Wake | Round: 6 | Opponent: Georgetown AM | Judge: Brossmann No signing statement and no impactAmira 9 – Dan Amira, Reporter at NY Mag, "Obama Won’t Abuse His Signing Statements Like Some People", New York Magazine, http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2009/03/obama_wont_abuse_his_signing_s.html President Obama issued a directive yesterday that all his predecessors’ signing statements — namely, | 11/21/13 |
Circumvention DA - 1AR - CSUF DubsTournament: CSUF | Round: Doubles | Opponent: Kentucky GR | Judge: JP, Hardy, Lucas-Bolin A2: Circumvention (General) – 1ARAnd – legacy costsAckerman 13 – Bruce Ackerman, Sterling Professor of Law at Yale Law School, "Oversight Now", Foreign Policy, 6-11, http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2013/06/11/oversight_now_FISA_executive_congress?page=full Partisans of the status quo will claim that a serious congressional effort will only make A2: Circumvention – Executive InterpretationPlan’s a broad definition that covers almost all uses of forceBacevich 13 – Andrew, Professor of History and International Relations at Boston University and Ph.D. in American Diplomatic History from Princeton University, The New American Militarism, p. 209-210 An essential step toward curbing the new American militarism is to redress this imbalance in A2: Circumvention – Congress Won’t Stop Use of Force – 2ACThey’ll regulateMcManus 13 – Doyle McManus, Washington Bureau Chief of the Los Angeles Times, MA and Fullbright Scholar at the University of Brussels, Four-Time Winner of the National Press Club’s Edwin Hood Award for Reporting on U.S. Foreign Policy, Winner of Georgetown University’s Weintal Prize, "In America, Not Isolationism But Skepticism", Los Angeles Times, 9-15, http://www.latimes.com/opinion/commentary/la-oe-mcmanus-column-congress-obama-and-syria-20130915,0,3944454.column Opposition in Congress to a presidential request to use force has a long history. Deters Executive overreachCole 11 – David Cole, Professor at the Georgetown University Law Center, "Where Liberty Lies: Civil Society and Individual Rights After 9/11", The Wayne Law Review, Winter, 57 Wayne L. Rev. 1203, Lexis In my view, Posner and Vermeule simultaneously underestimate the constraining force of law and | 1/8/14 |
Circumvention DA - 1AR - Texas 3Tournament: Texas | Round: 3 | Opponent: Georgetown ErMc | Judge: Katsulas Point Avoids Circumvention – 1AROur mechanism makes restrictions effectiveMitchell 9 – Jonathan, Assistant Professor of Law at the George Mason University School of Law, "Legislating Clear-Statement Regimes in National-Security Law", Georgia Law Review, Summer, 43 Ga. L. Rev. 1059, Lexis Conclusion Congress will frequently legislate clear-statement requirements in its national security legislation. PolicyAll of their evidence is descriptive of the status quo and the WPR – only our evidence makes the comparative claim that policy trials overcome current compliance issuesBuchanan 13(Bruce, professor of government at the University of Texas Austin, "Presidential Power and Accountability Toward a Presidential Accountability System") A2: Circumvention (General) – 1ARAnd – legacy costsAckerman 13 – Bruce Ackerman, Sterling Professor of Law at Yale Law School, "Oversight Now", Foreign Policy, 6-11, http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2013/06/11/oversight_now_FISA_executive_congress?page=full Partisans of the status quo will claim that a serious congressional effort will only make | 2/8/14 |
Circumvention DA - 1AR - Texas DubsTournament: Texas | Round: Doubles | Opponent: Emory JS | Judge: Gramzinski, Arnett, Walters 1ar EvidenceAll of their evidence is descriptive of the status quo and the WPR – only our evidence makes the comparative claim that policy trials overcome current compliance issuesBuchanan 13(Bruce, professor of government at the University of Texas Austin, "Presidential Power and Accountability Toward a Presidential Accountability System") A2: Circumvention (General) – 1AR – Signal IndependentSymbol’s independent of effectWolff 8 – Dj Wolff, Summer Associate at the Center for Strategic and International Studies and JD Candidate at Stanford Law School, "Should the Next President Advocate Replacing the War Powers Resolution?", World Politics Review, 8-12, http://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/articles/2558/should-the-next-president-advocate-replacing-the-war-powers-resolution Nevertheless, the WPCA can still serve a strong symbolic function. The Bush presidency A2: Circumvention – Congress Won’t Stop Use of Force – 2ACThey’ll regulateMcManus 13 – Doyle McManus, Washington Bureau Chief of the Los Angeles Times, MA and Fullbright Scholar at the University of Brussels, Four-Time Winner of the National Press Club’s Edwin Hood Award for Reporting on U.S. Foreign Policy, Winner of Georgetown University’s Weintal Prize, "In America, Not Isolationism But Skepticism", Los Angeles Times, 9-15, http://www.latimes.com/opinion/commentary/la-oe-mcmanus-column-congress-obama-and-syria-20130915,0,3944454.column Opposition in Congress to a presidential request to use force has a long history. A2: Circumvention (General) – 1ARAnd – legacy costsAckerman 13 – Bruce Ackerman, Sterling Professor of Law at Yale Law School, "Oversight Now", Foreign Policy, 6-11, http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2013/06/11/oversight_now_FISA_executive_congress?page=full Partisans of the status quo will claim that a serious congressional effort will only make | 2/10/14 |
Circumvention DA - 1AR - Wake QTournament: Wake | Round: Quarters | Opponent: Northwestern MV | Judge: Seth Gannon, Kallmyer, Brovero, Weiner, Feldman Obama will comply on IranSavage, 7 (charlie – globe staff, 12/20, interview with barack obama, "barack obama’s q26a", boston, http://www.boston.com/news/politics/2008/specials/candidateqa/obamaqa/)
| 12/14/13 |
Circumvention DA - 2AC - CSUF DubsTournament: CSUF | Round: Doubles | Opponent: Kentucky GR | Judge: JP, Hardy, Lucas-Bolin Avoids failings of our old planBuchanan 8 – Bruce Buchanan, Professor of Government at the University of Texas at Austin, "Presidential Accountability for Wars of Choice", Issues in Governance Studies, Number 22, December, http://www.brookings.edu/~~/media/research/files/papers/2008/12/3020war20buchanan/1230_war_buchanan.pdf This paper focuses on how Congress and the American people evaluate presidential wars of choice Increases political costs and solves signal regardlessWilkinson 12 – Will Wilkinson, Research Fellow at the Cato Institute, M.A. in Philosophy from the Northern Illinois University, Academic Coordinator of the Social Change Project and the Global Prosperity Initiative at The Mercatus Center at George Mason University, "Rebridling the Executive", Economist, 4-17, http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2012/04/democracy-and-war I think this is good, sound sense. Fabio Rojas, a professor of | 1/8/14 |
Circumvention DA - 2AC - Indiana 3Tournament: Indiana | Round: 3 | Opponent: Louisville LR | Judge: Frederick A2: Circumvention – Congress Won’t Stop Use of Force – 2ACThey’ll regulateMcManus 13 – Doyle McManus, Washington Bureau Chief of the Los Angeles Times, MA and Fullbright Scholar at the University of Brussels, Four-Time Winner of the National Press Club’s Edwin Hood Award for Reporting on U.S. Foreign Policy, Winner of Georgetown University’s Weintal Prize, "In America, Not Isolationism But Skepticism", Los Angeles Times, 9-15, http://www.latimes.com/opinion/commentary/la-oe-mcmanus-column-congress-obama-and-syria-20130915,0,3944454.column Opposition in Congress to a presidential request to use force has a long history. Deters Executive overreachCole 11 – David Cole, Professor at the Georgetown University Law Center, "Where Liberty Lies: Civil Society and Individual Rights After 9/11", The Wayne Law Review, Winter, 57 Wayne L. Rev. 1203, Lexis In my view, Posner and Vermeule simultaneously underestimate the constraining force of law and Congress won’t approve forceBerman 13 – Daniel Berman, Ph.D. Candidate in History at the London School of Economics, MAs at the University of St. Andrews and the London School of Economics, BA at Bates College, Writer for Fivethirtyeight.com, World-Outline, Dale26CO, and The American, "Syria, Congress, and Obama: The changing partisan contours of American foreign policy", The World Outline, 9-6, http://theworldoutline.com/2013/09/syria-congress-obama-changing-partisan-contours-american-foreign-policy/ As a consequence, the decision to seek congressional approval made political sense for Obama They’re motivated to restrictHuq 12 – Aziz Z. Huq, Assistant Professor of Law at the University of Chicago Law School, "Review: Binding the Executive (by Law or by Politics)", University of Chicago Law Review, 79 U. Chi. L. Rev. 777, Spring, Lexis Alternatively, perhaps the Neustadt and Skowronek accounts can be explained solely in terms of IraqKriner, 10 (Douglas L. – assistant professor of political science at Boston University, ed. William Howell and Jon Pevenhouse, "After the Rubicon: Congress, Presidents, and the Politics of Waging War", p. 148) Yet Congress’s repeated failure to terminate military engagements legislatively does not mean that Congress and Self-regulation solves prior to the voteBarron 8 – David J. Barron, Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and Martin S. Lederman, Visiting Professor of Law at the Georgetown University Law Center, "The Commander in Chief at the Lowest Ebb — A Constitutional History", Harvard Law Review, February, 121 Harv. L. Rev. 941, Lexis At the same time, the history we have reviewed casts doubt on the functionalist Congress will oppose force before troops are on the groundStreichler, 8 (Stuart – Adjunct Faculty at Seattle University School of Law and Ph.D. – Johns Hopkins University and J.D. – University of Michigan Law School, "Mad about Yoo, or, Why Worry about the Next Unconstitutional War?", Journal of Law 26 Politics XXIV.93, http://faculty.washington.edu/sstreich/documents/madaboutyoo.pdf) Once a military campaign is underway, Congress’s ability to check the president through the | 1/25/14 |
Circumvention DA - 2AC - Texas 3Tournament: Texas | Round: 3 | Opponent: Georgetown ErMc | Judge: Katsulas Avoids Circumvention – 2ACTrials avoid failings of our old planBuchanan 8 – Bruce Buchanan, Professor of Government at the University of Texas at Austin, "Presidential Accountability for Wars of Choice", Issues in Governance Studies, Number 22, December, http://www.brookings.edu/~~/media/research/files/papers/2008/12/3020war20buchanan/1230_war_buchanan.pdf This paper focuses on how Congress and the American people evaluate presidential wars of choice Point of order – it’s effectiveMitchell 9 – Jonathan, Assistant Professor of Law at the George Mason University School of Law, "Legislating Clear-Statement Regimes in National-Security Law", Georgia Law Review, Summer, 43 Ga. L. Rev. 1059, Lexis All of this has spurred proposals to strengthen the clear-statement regimes in Congress’s No circumvention generally –Increases political costs and solves signal regardlessWilkinson 12 – Will Wilkinson, Research Fellow at the Cato Institute, M.A. in Philosophy from the Northern Illinois University, Academic Coordinator of the Social Change Project and the Global Prosperity Initiative at The Mercatus Center at George Mason University, "Rebridling the Executive", Economist, 4-17, http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2012/04/democracy-and-war I think this is good, sound sense. Fabio Rojas, a professor of Self-interest and normative pressurePildes 12 – Richard H. Pildes, Sudler Family Professor of Constitutional Law at the NYU School of Law and Co-Director of the NYU Center on Law and Security, "Book Review: Law and the President", Harvard Law Review, April, 125 Harv. L. Rev. 1381, Lexis III. The Incomplete Consequentialist Theory for the Role of Law For these reasons, They’ll regulateMcManus 13 – Doyle McManus, Washington Bureau Chief of the Los Angeles Times, MA and Fullbright Scholar at the University of Brussels, Four-Time Winner of the National Press Club’s Edwin Hood Award for Reporting on U.S. Foreign Policy, Winner of Georgetown University’s Weintal Prize, "In America, Not Isolationism But Skepticism", Los Angeles Times, 9-15, http://www.latimes.com/opinion/commentary/la-oe-mcmanus-column-congress-obama-and-syria-20130915,0,3944454.column Opposition in Congress to a presidential request to use force has a long history. | 2/8/14 |
Circumvention DA - 2AC - Texas DubsTournament: Texas | Round: Doubles | Opponent: Emory JS | Judge: Gramzinski, Arnett, Walters Circumvention – 2ACAvoids failings of our old planBuchanan 8 – Bruce Buchanan, Professor of Government at the University of Texas at Austin, "Presidential Accountability for Wars of Choice", Issues in Governance Studies, Number 22, December, http://www.brookings.edu/~~/media/research/files/papers/2008/12/3020war20buchanan/1230_war_buchanan.pdf This paper focuses on how Congress and the American people evaluate presidential wars of choice Self-interest and normative pressurePildes 12 – Richard H. Pildes, Sudler Family Professor of Constitutional Law at the NYU School of Law and Co-Director of the NYU Center on Law and Security, "Book Review: Law and the President", Harvard Law Review, April, 125 Harv. L. Rev. 1381, Lexis III. The Incomplete Consequentialist Theory for the Role of Law For these reasons, Increases political costs and solves signal regardlessWilkinson 12 – Will Wilkinson, Research Fellow at the Cato Institute, M.A. in Philosophy from the Northern Illinois University, Academic Coordinator of the Social Change Project and the Global Prosperity Initiative at The Mercatus Center at George Mason University, "Rebridling the Executive", Economist, 4-17, http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2012/04/democracy-and-war I think this is good, sound sense. Fabio Rojas, a professor of Neg’s pessimism about circumvention is wrong and CAUSES Fascism. We can win on this even if plan does nothing.Kutz ’7 | 2/10/14 |
Circumvention DA - 2AC - Wake QTournament: Wake | Round: Quarters | Opponent: Northwestern MV | Judge: Seth Gannon, Kallmyer, Brovero, Weiner, Feldman Plan’s a broad definition that covers almost all uses of forceBacevich 13 – Andrew, Professor of History and International Relations at Boston University and Ph.D. in American Diplomatic History from Princeton University, The New American Militarism, p. 209-210 An essential step toward curbing the new American militarism is to redress this imbalance in | 12/14/13 |
Colonialism K - 1AR - CSUF 1Tournament: CSUF | Round: 1 | Opponent: Irvine San Fran State University PA | Judge: Larson, Andy KUtil( ) Ethics 1st wrong – utility is net more ethical Williams ’5 Perm( ) Ontological 2nd –2 focus forever delays political action Jarvis, 2K This we might interpret as faceless description without meaning, comment without purpose, and Our definition of genocide. May ’10 When the term "genocide" is used popularly, it is often indistinguishable from Krygier ’5 5. Analogy Wars As Owen Harries once pointed out, ’comparisons may be — "Natives first" is a terrible political strategy – alike groups should work together – excluding the plan shatters the coalitions necessary to confront oppression Remediation— alt is a token gesture to pacify Native Americans – it can’t possibly compensate for colonization Native Americans were here first. We took their land while generously doling out reservations | 1/7/14 |
Colonialism K - 2AC - CSUF 1Tournament: CSUF | Round: 1 | Opponent: Irvine San Fran State University PA | Judge: Larson, Andy 2AC – SturExtend our 1AC Stuhr ev. K’s of Aff’s macro-political starting point don’t apply in the War Powers context. Neg’s anti-State and micro-1st stance fail. Stuhr’s next paragraph prove that WE DON’T EXCLUDE their framework – but perm’s the best option.Stuhr ’8 These and related experiences, rooted in a love of war, are not merely Heuristic Solves Colonialism( ) Our Heuristic breaks-down colonialist power structures. If they win the State or Debate’s colonialist – we still best teach how to re-assign that power.INOUE ’5 Gutherie’s definition of nomos helps us also see the nomos-physis debate as one FiatTwo – We’re vertical constraint through the public sphere.Lobel ’89 These changes would supplement and ultimately transform traditional separation of power restraints. The constitutional Three – Awareness. We may spur macro-change. If we don’t, our Aff still boosts awareness. This beats framework distinctions by helping the debate-space adjust to Executive practice:Young – quoting Stewart – ’13 About six months ago, my assistant debate coaches and I decided that it would be a good idea to craft a justification paper to persuade the NDT-CEDA college policy debate community AND opinions will stand as an important potential check on the presidency. 2AC Add-on – Native AmericansUnless POTUS authority declines via the Aff’s effort to have greater Congressional review, racist interventions in the form of denigrating Native peoples will increase.Grynaviski ’13 Second, this conception rightly focuses us outward, rather than inward. The current Add-on – WarA 2nd Add-on is that War causes imperial injustice – and not the other way around. Causality runs in our direction.Goldstein ’1 I began this book hoping to contribute in some way to a deeper understanding of 2AC Graham extensionTheir framework CAN’T solve urban oppression. It rejects fiat and non-local theorization. This ignores macro-origins which shape the local more than vice-versa.Ebert ’5 2AC – Settler Colonialism K— Turn – remediation focus – cannot undo past harm to natives – only locks in a cycle of guilt and hostilityEspinoza and Harris 97 (Leslie, Associate Professor of Law – Boston College Law School and Angela P., Professor of Law – University of California, Berkeley School of Law, "Embracing the Tar-Baby - LatCrit Theory and the Sticky Mess of Race", California Law Review, October, 85 Calif. L. Rev. 1585, Lexis) Interracial justice in Yamamoto’s sense may also require that we question the underlying assumption of EssentialismThese specific forms of essentialism should be rejected– re-deployment bad, get commodified.Brady 26 Monani ’12 While the Campo example highlights the challenges of balancing economics with environmental¶ concerns, ( ) Reject essentialism as an end onto itself. It is violent.Chilisa ’12 The last theme is how African and Asian feminists and other non-Western feminists K of the term "settler"( ) They’ve called us "settlers". That term offends many Native People because of what it implies about their Native ancestors. Means we can win a net turn within the Neg Framework.Johansen ’7 The term also essentializes all non-indigenous into one category. That essentializes and create binaries that make their solvency impossible.Phung ’11 Not only have I drawn on Lawrence and Dua’s critical intervention but I have also ( ) And, reject essentialism as the basis of claims – it’s inaccurate and exclusionary.Heyes ’97 Its neglect of power differences among women notwithstanding, much second wave theory was " Isaac – Util/Ethics( ) No, not ethics disad – consequencesIssac, ’2 2AC – Imperialism not root of violence( ) Imperialism doesn’t make war inevitable – that oversimplifiesAmar ’11 Epistemology/Ontology( ) Epistemology and ontology are not firstJarvis 2K | 1/7/14 |
Concurrent Resolution CP - 1AR - Indiana 7Tournament: Indiana | Round: 7 | Opponent: Michigan CP | Judge: Hingstman A2: Congressional Follow-OnZero chance of follow-on AND you’ve just lost on links to politicsDrum 13 – Kevin Drum, Mother Jones, 4/22/13, Maureen Dowd and Presidential Leverage, www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2013/04/maureen-dowd-and-presidential-leverage Finally, there’s the most obvious change of all: the decision by Republicans to Congressional Resolution – Ext – No Solve SOP====Statutory checks are key to an active congress ==== Members of Congress need to participate in the daily grind of overseeing administration policies, Wont signal congress taking back war power authoritySchonberg 4 – Karl K. Schonberg, Assistant Professor of Government at St. Lawrence University, "Global Security and Legal Restraint: Reconsidering War Powers after September 11", Political Science, 119(1), p. 140 But consultation cannot supplant the congressional authority to declare war, which can be exercised Congressional Resolution – Ext – Not Solve SignalSoft law wrecks the signalShaffer 11 – Gregory Shaffer, Professor of Law, University of Minnesota Law School, and Mark Pollack, Professor of Political Science and Jean Monnet Chair, Temple University., Sept 2011, ARTICLE: HARD VERSUS SOFT LAW IN INTERNATIONAL SECURITY, 52 B.C. L. Rev 1147 As we have observed in our previous scholarship, the existing analyses of hard and | 1/26/14 |
Concurrent Resolution CP - 2AC - Harvard 3Tournament: Harvard | Round: 3 | Opponent: Kansas BC | Judge: Hardy Perm—-do the CP: it restricts authorityFisher 9 – Louis Fisher, Scholar in Residence at the Cato Constitution Project, 2009, The Law: The Baker-Christopher War Powers Commission, Presidential Studies Quarterly Volume 39, Issue 1 The commission devotes a section to the War Powers Resolution (WPR), summarizing the Causes uncertainty and strategic failureGallagher 11 – Lieutenant Colonel Joseph V. Gallagher III, United States Marine Corps, "Unconstitutional War: Strategic Risk in the Age of Congressional Abdication", Parameters, Summer, http://strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/parameters/articles/2011summer/gallagher.pdf Clausewitz asserted war is politics by other means. Therefore, in the American democracy Doesn’t bind or solve signalKall 7 (Rob, Executive Editor, Publisher and Website Architect of OpEdNews.com, Host of the Rob Kall Bottom Up Radio Show (WNJC 1360 AM), and Publisher of Storycon.org, President of Futurehealth, Inc, and an inventor . He is also published regularly on the Huffingtonpost.com, "Forget About "Sense of Congress" Legislation by Bush Enablers," January 24, http://www.opednews.com/populum/printer_friendly.php?content=a26id=29762-http://www.opednews.com/populum/printer_friendly.php?content=a26id=29762) There’s no doubt. Bush is the worst president in US history. That’s a President will ignore itSamples 11 (John, Director of the Center for Representative Government at the Cato Institute, "Congress Surrenders the War Powers Libya, the United Nations, and the Constitution," October 27, http://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/pa687.pdf-http://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/pa687.pdf) President Clinton sent American engineers to begin rebuilding the nation as part of the agreement Specifically true for concurrent resolutionsEl-Haj 12 – Tabatha Abu El-Haj, Assistant Professor of Law, Drexel University, Earle Mack School of Law. J.D./Ph.D., New York University, "Linking the Questions: Judicial Supremacy as a Matter of Constitutional Interpretation", Washington University Law Review, 89 Wash. U. L. Rev. 1309, Lexis While obviously legitimate, a joint resolution, insofar as it requires united opposition to Avoiding Presentment means no force of law or binding effectGlicksman 84 – Robert L. Glicksman, Associate Professor of Law at the University of Kansas, "Severability and the Realignment of the Balance of Power Over the Public Lands: The Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 After the Legislative Veto Decisions", Hastings Law Journal, September, 36 Hastings L.J. 3, Lexis There is a more convincing reason, however, why the Supreme Court’s statements in Means no enforcement and Court strike-downGarcia 3 – Michael J. Garcia, "A Necessary Response: The Lack of Domestic and International Constraints Upon a U.S. Nuclear Response to a Terrorist Attack", The Georgetown Journal of Law 26 Public Policy, Summer, 1 Geo. J.L. 26 Pub. Pol’y 515, Lexis Frustration at the excesses of executive discretion in interpreting the Tonkin Gulf Resolution propelled Congress Links to politicsKriner, 10 (Douglas L. – assistant professor of political science at Boston University, ed. William Howell and Jon Pevenhouse, "After the Rubicon: Congress, Presidents, and the Politics of Waging War", p. 36) By contrast, chapter 2 argues that all of these actions, both formal and Specifically true for concurrent resolutionsGerson 9 – Jacob Gerson, U. Chicago Ast. Professor Law, Eric Posner, U. Chicago Law Professor, December 2008, Article: Soft Law: Lessons from Congressional Practice, 61 Stan. L. Rev. 573 But why is Congress’s statement credible? Maybe Congress does not really mean that it | 11/5/13 |
Concurrent Resolution CP - 2AC - Indiana 7Tournament: Indiana | Round: 7 | Opponent: Michigan CP | Judge: Hingstman Perm—-do the CP: it restricts authorityFisher 9 – Louis Fisher, Scholar in Residence at the Cato Constitution Project, 2009, The Law: The Baker-Christopher War Powers Commission, Presidential Studies Quarterly Volume 39, Issue 1 The commission devotes a section to the War Powers Resolution (WPR), summarizing the Causes uncertainty and strategic failureGallagher 11 – Lieutenant Colonel Joseph V. Gallagher III, United States Marine Corps, "Unconstitutional War: Strategic Risk in the Age of Congressional Abdication", Parameters, Summer, http://strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/parameters/articles/2011summer/gallagher.pdf Clausewitz asserted war is politics by other means. Therefore, in the American democracy Doesn’t bind or solve signalKall 7 (Rob, Executive Editor, Publisher and Website Architect of OpEdNews.com, Host of the Rob Kall Bottom Up Radio Show (WNJC 1360 AM), and Publisher of Storycon.org, President of Futurehealth, Inc, and an inventor . He is also published regularly on the Huffingtonpost.com, "Forget About "Sense of Congress" Legislation by Bush Enablers," January 24, http://www.opednews.com/populum/printer_friendly.php?content=a26id=29762) There’s no doubt. Bush is the worst president in US history. That’s a President will ignore itSamples 11 (John, Director of the Center for Representative Government at the Cato Institute, "Congress Surrenders the War Powers Libya, the United Nations, and the Constitution," October 27, http://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/pa687.pdf) President Clinton sent American engineers to begin rebuilding the nation as part of the agreement Links to politicsKriner, 10 (Douglas L. – assistant professor of political science at Boston University, ed. William Howell and Jon Pevenhouse, "After the Rubicon: Congress, Presidents, and the Politics of Waging War", p. 36) By contrast, chapter 2 argues that all of these actions, both formal and | 1/26/14 |
Congress Oversight CP 2AC - GSU Round 4Tournament: GSU | Round: 4 | Opponent: Kentucky GV | Judge: Norris 2ac OversightCounterplan doesn’t signal morale or unified purposeWeingast 98 – Matthew S. Weingast, Adjunct Professor at the Joint Military Intelligence College, Associate on the National Security Team at Booz-Allen 26 Hamilton, M.S. in Strategic Intelligence from The Defense Intelligence College, Former Strategic Intelligence Officer for The Joint Chiefs of Staff, and#34;The Strategic Necessity Perspective: A New Approach to Solving Old Constitutional War Powers Questionsand#34;, USAFA Journal of Legal Studies, 8 USAFA J. Leg. Stud. 109, Lexis The Strategic Necessity Perspective: What It Is and How It Works Even if oversight solves in theory in practice congress is ineffectiveOrnstein and Mann 6(Norman, resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, Thomas, W. Averell Harriman Chair and senior fellow in Governance Studies at The Brookings Institution, and#34;When Congress Checks Out,and#34; December, ProQuest) Obama will circumvent oversight and it won’t bind future executivesStevenson 8 – Charles A. Stevenson, Professor of National Security Policy at the National War College, and#34;Congress in Retreat on War Powers Reformand#34;, Boston Globe, 7-11, http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2008/07/11/congress_in_retreat_on_war_powers_reform/ Doesn’t solve SOPSchonberg 4 – Karl K. Schonberg, Assistant Professor of Government at St. Lawrence University, and#34;Global Security and Legal Restraint: Reconsidering War Powers after September 11and#34;, Political Science, 119(1), p. 140 By contrast, chapter 2 argues that all of these actions, both formal and Only formal checks solve – congress won’t be forceful enough otherwise One voice has been conspicuous in its absence, however: that of Congress itself | 10/4/13 |
Consult the Womb CP - 2AC - Harvard 5Tournament: Harvard | Round: 5 | Opponent: Wake DL | Judge: Fitzmier We defend the idea of the plan – not immediacy or certaintyAC 99 (Atlas Collaboration, "Use of Shall, Should, May Can," http://rd13doc.cern.ch/Atlas/DaqSoft/sde/inspect/shall.html) shall ’shall’ describes something that is mandatory. If a requirement uses ’shall’, then Always valueCoontz’1 There’s no strong methodological defense of their claim—-they sweepingly assert "root cause" without any verifiable proofJarvis 00 (Darryl, Senior Lecturer in International Relations – University of Sydney, International Relations and the Challenge of Postmodernism, p. 173-174) Crude characterizations of a hegemonic gender class thus display an anomalous capacity to ignore completely War isn’t solely a product of gender and focusing on identity first doesn’t "spill up"Jarvis 00 (Daryl, Lecturer in Government and International Relations – University of Sydney, International Relations and the Challenge of Postmodernism: Defending the Discipline) Lurking Behind such positions, of course, is the highly problematic assumption that a Perm do both – genuine not key – it crushes credibilityCarroll 9 (Jamie FF, Notes 26 Comments Editor – Emory International Law Review, J.D. with Honors – Emory University School of Law, "Back to the Future: Redefining the Foreign Investment and National Security Act’s Conception of National Security", Emory International Law Review, 23 Emory Int’l L. Rev. 167, Lexis) n221. See Thomas Friedman, Op-Ed., 9/11 is Over | 11/5/13 |
Courts CP - 2AC Cards - GSU DoublesTournament: GSU | Round: Doubles | Opponent: Wake HS | Judge: Cohn, Paul, Kall Doesn’t solve alliances or joint operations – Congressional signal’s keyMoss 8 While the Constitution’s authors would rightly view the current U.S. situation with Joint operations multiple global threatsBrooks 13 – Stephen G., Associate Professor of Government at Dartmouth College, G. John ikenberry, Albert G. Milbank Professor of Politics and International Affairs at Princeton University and Global Eminence Scholar at Kyung Hee University in Seoul and William C. Wohlforth, Professor of Government at Dartmouth College, "Lean Forward", Foreign Affairs, January / February, 92(1) What goes for the global economy goes for other forms of international cooperation. Here CP doesn’t send a clear signal, undermines SOP, and gets delayed – true even if they rule on SOP groundsEntin 12 III. THE BENEFITS OF POLITICAL RESOLUTION OF ¶ INTERBRANCH DISPUTES¶ Whatever the merits CP cripples Congressional leadershipFisher 4 The framers’ basic theory, guiding us for two centuries, is that "ambition Plan boosts Congressional leadership —- solves existential threatsHamilton 2 – Lee H., President and Director of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Vice Chairman of the 9/11 Commission, President’s Homeland Security Advisory Council, Former Member of the United States House of Representatives for 34 years, Co-Chair of the Iraq Study Group, Formerly Special Assistant to the Director at the Woodrow Wilson Center, A Creative Tension: The Foreign Policy Roles of the President and Congress, p. 3-7 We face many dangers, however. The diversity of the security and economic threats | 9/29/13 |
Debt Ceiling DA - 1AR - Clay 2Tournament: Clay | Round: 2 | Opponent: Cal SW | Judge: Roark 1AR – Backpay Thumper – LossObama’s pushing itFox News, 10-1-2013 http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/10/01/obama-addresses-military-as-govt-shuts-down/-http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/10/01/obama-addresses-military-as-govt-shuts-down/ As much of the federal government grinds to a halt, President Obama is telling | 10/5/13 |
Debt Ceiling DA - 1AR - Clay 6Tournament: Clay | Round: 6 | Opponent: Wake MS | Judge: Barouch The issues are conflated and they’re running out of timePolitico, 10-3-2013 http://www.politico.com/story/2013/10/democrats-cr-debt-ceiling-97806.html-http://www.politico.com/story/2013/10/democrats-cr-debt-ceiling-97806.html Democratic demands are the same as they’ve always been: They want the GOP to Decreases the chances of success- default likelyThe conventional wisdom was that Republicans and Democrats would bury their bombast and resolve the | 10/6/13 |
Debt Ceiling DA - 2AC - Clay 2Tournament: Clay | Round: 2 | Opponent: Cal SW | Judge: Roark Won’t pass- health care negotiations failNick Chiles is a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist and New York Times bestselling author. He has written or co-written 11 books and won over a dozen major journalism awards during a journalism career that brought him to the Dallas Morning News, the Star-Ledger of New Jersey and New York Newsday, in addition to serving as Editor-in-Chief of Odyssey Couleur travel magazine. 10-2-2013 http://atlantablackstar.com/2013/10/02/debt-ceiling-looming-stubbornness-congress-spell-economic-catastrophe/-http://atlantablackstar.com/2013/10/02/debt-ceiling-looming-stubbornness-congress-spell-economic-catastrophe/ House Republicans have shut down the federal government with the bizarre demand that President Obama Shutdown causes chaos for debt ceiling and thumps the econ impactA shutdown would have serious implications for the American economy, which is still struggling Backpay vote after shutdown is over thumps the DALA Times, 9-30-2013 http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-shutdown-economy-20131001,0,3865701,full.story-http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-shutdown-economy-20131001,0,3865701,full.story Also, this time, it’s unclear whether federal workers considered to be in nonessential Err aff- their no impact cards are media outlets downplaying the affects to shield the GOPAlbert Kleine joined Media Matters in 2012 as Senior Economics Researcher. He has previously conducted research on distributional effects of property taxes and ecological economics. He holds a Master of Philosophy in land economy from the University of Cambridge. 10-1-2013 http://mediamatters.org/blog/2013/10/01/fox-ignores-history-to-claim-last-shutdown-didn/196202 Fox Business host Melissa Francis erroneously claimed that previous government shutdowns in the 1990s did No impactBarnett 9 (Thomas, Senior Strategic Researcher – Naval War College, "The New Rules: Security Remains Stable Amid Financial Crisis", Asset Protection Network, 8-25, http://www.aprodex.com/the-new-rules—security-remains-stable-amid-financial-crisis-398-bl.aspx) When the global financial crisis struck roughly a year ago, the blogosphere was ablaze Huge bipartisan support for the planGelb 5 – Leslie H. Gelb, President Emeritus of the Council on Foreign Relations and Anne-Marie Slaughter, Dean of the Woodrow Wilson School of International and Public Affairs, "Declare War", The Atlantic, 11-1, http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2005/11/declare-war/304301/?single_page=true Passing this legislation might not be easy. But the time is right. Liberals | 10/5/13 |
Debt Ceiling DA - 2AC - Clay 4Tournament: Clay | Round: 4 | Opponent: Kentucky GV | Judge: Brown, Nick Won’t pass- health care negotiations failNick Chiles is a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist and New York Times bestselling author. He has written or co-written 11 books and won over a dozen major journalism awards during a journalism career that brought him to the Dallas Morning News, the Star-Ledger of New Jersey and New York Newsday, in addition to serving as Editor-in-Chief of Odyssey Couleur travel magazine. 10-2-2013 http://atlantablackstar.com/2013/10/02/debt-ceiling-looming-stubbornness-congress-spell-economic-catastrophe/-http://atlantablackstar.com/2013/10/02/debt-ceiling-looming-stubbornness-congress-spell-economic-catastrophe/ House Republicans have shut down the federal government with the bizarre demand that President Obama Shutdown causes chaos for debt ceiling and thumps the econ impactA shutdown would have serious implications for the American economy, which is still struggling Obama not pushing- won’t even picnicOn the eve of another fiscal showdown with congressional Republicans, President Obama is outright Backpay vote after shutdown is over thumps the DALA Times, 9-30-2013 http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-shutdown-economy-20131001,0,3865701,full.story-http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-shutdown-economy-20131001,0,3865701,full.story Also, this time, it’s unclear whether federal workers considered to be in nonessential Losing on Budget and a laundry list of other failures that overwhelm the affLawrence 9/17/13 In some ways Obama’s fifth year is typical of fifth years, when reelected presidents Err aff- their no impact cards are media outlets downplaying the affects to shield the GOPAlbert Kleine joined Media Matters in 2012 as Senior Economics Researcher. He has previously conducted research on distributional effects of property taxes and ecological economics. He holds a Master of Philosophy in land economy from the University of Cambridge. 10-1-2013 http://mediamatters.org/blog/2013/10/01/fox-ignores-history-to-claim-last-shutdown-didn/196202 Fox Business host Melissa Francis erroneously claimed that previous government shutdowns in the 1990s did No impact- prioritizationRomina Boccia is the Grover M. Hermann Fellow in Federal Budgetary Affairs in the Thomas A. Roe Institute for Economic Policy Studies at The Heritage Foundation., 9-18-2013 http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2013/09/debt-limit-options-and-the-way-forward-http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2013/09/debt-limit-options-and-the-way-forward If Congress does not raise the debt limit by mid-October, the Treasury No impactBarnett 9 (Thomas, Senior Strategic Researcher – Naval War College, "The New Rules: Security Remains Stable Amid Financial Crisis", Asset Protection Network, 8-25, http://www.aprodex.com/the-new-rules—security-remains-stable-amid-financial-crisis-398-bl.aspx) When the global financial crisis struck roughly a year ago, the blogosphere was ablaze Huge bipartisan support for the planGelb 5 – Leslie H. Gelb, President Emeritus of the Council on Foreign Relations and Anne-Marie Slaughter, Dean of the Woodrow Wilson School of International and Public Affairs, "Declare War", The Atlantic, 11-1, http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2005/11/declare-war/304301/?single_page=true Passing this legislation might not be easy. But the time is right. Liberals | 10/6/13 |
Debt Ceiling DA - 2AC - Clay 7Tournament: Clay | Round: 7 | Opponent: USC PV | Judge: Revelins Won’t pass- health care negotiations failNick Chiles is a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist and New York Times bestselling author. He has written or co-written 11 books and won over a dozen major journalism awards during a journalism career that brought him to the Dallas Morning News, the Star-Ledger of New Jersey and New York Newsday, in addition to serving as Editor-in-Chief of Odyssey Couleur travel magazine. 10-2-2013 http://atlantablackstar.com/2013/10/02/debt-ceiling-looming-stubbornness-congress-spell-economic-catastrophe/-http://atlantablackstar.com/2013/10/02/debt-ceiling-looming-stubbornness-congress-spell-economic-catastrophe/ House Republicans have shut down the federal government with the bizarre demand that President Obama Shutdown causes chaos for debt ceiling and thumps the econ impactA shutdown would have serious implications for the American economy, which is still struggling Obama not pushing- won’t even picnicOn the eve of another fiscal showdown with congressional Republicans, President Obama is outright No impact- prioritizationRomina Boccia is the Grover M. Hermann Fellow in Federal Budgetary Affairs in the Thomas A. Roe Institute for Economic Policy Studies at The Heritage Foundation., 9-18-2013 http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2013/09/debt-limit-options-and-the-way-forward-http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2013/09/debt-limit-options-and-the-way-forward If Congress does not raise the debt limit by mid-October, the Treasury | 11/5/13 |
Debt Ceiling DA - 2AC - GSU DoublesTournament: GSU | Round: Doubles | Opponent: Wake HS | Judge: Cohn, Paul, Kall All the incentives line up against a dealChris Cillizza, 9/18/13, 5 reasons why a government shutdown is (likely) coming, www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/09/18/5-reasons-why-a-government-shutdown-is-likely-coming/?wprss=rss_politics26clsrd
Obama not pushing- won’t even picnicOn the eve of another fiscal showdown with congressional Republicans, President Obama is outright No impact- prioritizationRomina Boccia is the Grover M. Hermann Fellow in Federal Budgetary Affairs in the Thomas A. Roe Institute for Economic Policy Studies at The Heritage Foundation., 9-18-2013 http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2013/09/debt-limit-options-and-the-way-forward-http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2013/09/debt-limit-options-and-the-way-forward If Congress does not raise the debt limit by mid-October, the Treasury No agenda and issues are disconnected—spillover is merely GOP red herringsBrian Beutler, Salon staff writer, 9/9/13, GOP’s massive new lie: The truth about Obama’s second term , www.salon.com/2013/09/09/syria_wont_derail_obamas_second_term_house_republicans_will/ Political reporters have a weakness for narratives, and the narrative of a weakened president Budget, farm bill, Syria, energy and immigration thumpWill the House pass a short-term budget this week? Maybe. Will No impactBarnett 9 (Thomas, Senior Strategic Researcher – Naval War College, "The New Rules: Security Remains Stable Amid Financial Crisis", Asset Protection Network, 8-25, http://www.aprodex.com/the-new-rules—security-remains-stable-amid-financial-crisis-398-bl.aspx) When the global financial crisis struck roughly a year ago, the blogosphere was ablaze | 9/29/13 |
Debt Ceiling DA - 2AC - UK RR 2Tournament: UK RR | Round: 2 | Opponent: Michigan AP | Judge: Hardy Won’t pass- healthcareHook et al., 10/1 (Janet Hook, Kristina Peterson, Carol E. Lee, and#34;Lawmakers Resume Budget Battleand#34;, The New York Times, http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304373104579109083001071104.html?mod=WSJ_WS J_US_News_4-http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304373104579109083001071104.html?mod=WSJ_WS20J_US_News_4) Other Republicans—including Mr. Boehner himself, in the past—have favored Shutdown causes chaos for debt ceiling and thumps the econ impactA shutdown would have serious implications for the American economy, which is still struggling PC low and fails for fiscal fightsGreg Sargent 9-12, September 12th, 2013, and#34;The Morning Plum: Senate conservatives stick the knife in House GOP leaders,and#34; Washington Post, factiva All of this underscores a basic fact about this fall’s fiscal fights: Far and Obama not pushing- won’t even picnicOn the eve of another fiscal showdown with congressional Republicans, President Obama is outright Err aff- neg impacts are media fear-mongeringGoodwin 13 ~Tracy, graduate student in political science (Stonybrook), and#34;Fear-Mongering is Despicable Regardless of who is doing it,and#34; SocioPolitical Dysfunction, 2/27, http://sociopoliticaldysfunction.wordpress.com/category/politics-2/international-relations-politics/-http://sociopoliticaldysfunction.wordpress.com/category/politics-2/international-relations-politics/~~ Then even after the sequestration showdown this week we have another fear-mongering opportunity Obama will XO itBusiness Insider, 9-30-2013 http://www.businessinsider.com/it-increasingly-looks-like-obama-will-have-to-raise-the-debt-ceiling-all-by-himself-2013-9-http://www.businessinsider.com/it-increasingly-looks-like-obama-will-have-to-raise-the-debt-ceiling-all-by-himself-2013-9 With no movement on either side and the debt ceiling fast approaching, there’s increasing No impactBarnett 9 (Thomas, Senior Strategic Researcher – Naval War College, and#34;The New Rules: Security Remains Stable Amid Financial Crisisand#34;, Asset Protection Network, 8-25, http://www.aprodex.com/the-new-rules—security-remains-stable-amid-financial-crisis-398-bl.aspx) When the global financial crisis struck roughly a year ago, the blogosphere was ablaze Huge bipartisan support for the planGelb 5 – Leslie H. Gelb, President Emeritus of the Council on Foreign Relations and Anne-Marie Slaughter, Dean of the Woodrow Wilson School of International and Public Affairs, and#34;Declare Warand#34;, The Atlantic, 11-1, http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2005/11/declare-war/304301/?single_page=true Passing this legislation might not be easy. But the time is right. Liberals | 10/4/13 |
Debt Ceiling DA - 2AC - UK RR 4Tournament: UK RR | Round: 4 | Opponent: Kentucky GR | Judge: Green, Justin Won’t pass- healthcareHook et al., 10/1 (Janet Hook, Kristina Peterson, Carol E. Lee, "Lawmakers Resume Budget Battle", The New York Times, http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304373104579109083001071104.html?mod=WSJ_WS J_US_News_4-http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304373104579109083001071104.html?mod=WSJ_WS20J_US_News_4) Other Republicans—including Mr. Boehner himself, in the past—have favored Shutdown causes chaos for debt ceiling and thumps the econ impactA shutdown would have serious implications for the American economy, which is still struggling PC low and fails for fiscal fightsGreg Sargent 9-12, September 12th, 2013, "The Morning Plum: Senate conservatives stick the knife in House GOP leaders," Washington Post, factiva All of this underscores a basic fact about this fall’s fiscal fights: Far and Obama not pushing- won’t even picnicOn the eve of another fiscal showdown with congressional Republicans, President Obama is outright Err aff- neg impacts are media fear-mongeringGoodwin 13 ~Tracy, graduate student in political science (Stonybrook), "Fear-Mongering is Despicable Regardless of who is doing it," SocioPolitical Dysfunction, 2/27, http://sociopoliticaldysfunction.wordpress.com/category/politics-2/international-relations-politics/-http://sociopoliticaldysfunction.wordpress.com/category/politics-2/international-relations-politics/~~ Then even after the sequestration showdown this week we have another fear-mongering opportunity Obama will XO itBusiness Insider, 9-30-2013 http://www.businessinsider.com/it-increasingly-looks-like-obama-will-have-to-raise-the-debt-ceiling-all-by-himself-2013-9-http://www.businessinsider.com/it-increasingly-looks-like-obama-will-have-to-raise-the-debt-ceiling-all-by-himself-2013-9 With no movement on either side and the debt ceiling fast approaching, there’s increasing No impact- prioritizationRomina Boccia is the Grover M. Hermann Fellow in Federal Budgetary Affairs in the Thomas A. Roe Institute for Economic Policy Studies at The Heritage Foundation., 9-18-2013 http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2013/09/debt-limit-options-and-the-way-forward-http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2013/09/debt-limit-options-and-the-way-forward If Congress does not raise the debt limit by mid-October, the Treasury | 10/4/13 |
Debt Ceiling DA - 2AC - UK RR 6Tournament: UK RR | Round: 6 | Opponent: Emory JS | Judge: Russell Won’t pass- health care negotiations failNick Chiles is a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist and New York Times bestselling author. He has written or co-written 11 books and won over a dozen major journalism awards during a journalism career that brought him to the Dallas Morning News, the Star-Ledger of New Jersey and New York Newsday, in addition to serving as Editor-in-Chief of Odyssey Couleur travel magazine. 10-2-2013 http://atlantablackstar.com/2013/10/02/debt-ceiling-looming-stubbornness-congress-spell-economic-catastrophe/-http://atlantablackstar.com/2013/10/02/debt-ceiling-looming-stubbornness-congress-spell-economic-catastrophe/ House Republicans have shut down the federal government with the bizarre demand that President Obama Shutdown causes chaos for debt ceiling and thumps the econ impactA shutdown would have serious implications for the American economy, which is still struggling Backpay vote after shutdown is over thumps the DALA Times, 9-30-2013 http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-shutdown-economy-20131001,0,3865701,full.story-http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-shutdown-economy-20131001,0,3865701,full.story Also, this time, it’s unclear whether federal workers considered to be in nonessential Losing on Budget and a laundry list of other failures that overwhelm the affLawrence 9/17/13 In some ways Obama’s fifth year is typical of fifth years, when reelected presidents Err aff- neg impacts are media fear-mongeringGoodwin 13 ~Tracy, graduate student in political science (Stonybrook), "Fear-Mongering is Despicable Regardless of who is doing it," SocioPolitical Dysfunction, 2/27, http://sociopoliticaldysfunction.wordpress.com/category/politics-2/international-relations-politics/-http://sociopoliticaldysfunction.wordpress.com/category/politics-2/international-relations-politics/~~ Then even after the sequestration showdown this week we have another fear-mongering opportunity No impactBarnett 9 (Thomas, Senior Strategic Researcher – Naval War College, "The New Rules: Security Remains Stable Amid Financial Crisis", Asset Protection Network, 8-25, http://www.aprodex.com/the-new-rules—security-remains-stable-amid-financial-crisis-398-bl.aspx) When the global financial crisis struck roughly a year ago, the blogosphere was ablaze | 10/4/13 |
Debt Ceiling DA 1AR - GSU Round 2Tournament: GSU | Round: 2 | Opponent: Michigan CH | Judge: Severson PoliticsExt. No PushObama won’t push- not willing to negotiatePresident Barack Obama and his closest advisers are making it clear: They will not Recent speeches proveIBT- International Business Times, 9-16-2013 http://www.ibtimes.com/president-obama-i-will-not-negotiate-debt-ceiling-1406580-http://www.ibtimes.com/president-obama-i-will-not-negotiate-debt-ceiling-1406580 In a White House speech that resembled Obama’s campaign-style rhetoric from last year 1AR – Budget – T of the DVote this fridayHuey-Burns 9/18 Speaker John Boehner has decided to virtually bet the House on thrashing Obamacare in a 1AR – Budget – Obama PushHES SO INVOLVED- He just isn’t succeeding- drains PCBlake 9/18/13 White House press secretary Jay Carney on Wednesday fought back against criticism that President Obama 1AR – Budget – LossLosing on Budget and a laundry list of other failures that overwhelm the affLawrence 9/17/13 In some ways Obama’s fifth year is typical of fifth years, when reelected presidents | 10/4/13 |
Debt Ceiling DA 1AR - GSU Round 4Tournament: GSU | Round: 4 | Opponent: Kentucky GV | Judge: Norris Debt Ceiling 1ARNo disease impact—intervening actors, empirics, this ain’t 1918 yo It certainly looks like another example of crying wolf. After bracing ourselves for a Obama won’t push- not willing to negotiatePresident Barack Obama and his closest advisers are making it clear: They will not Recent speeches proveIBT- International Business Times, 9-16-2013 http://www.ibtimes.com/president-obama-i-will-not-negotiate-debt-ceiling-1406580-http://www.ibtimes.com/president-obama-i-will-not-negotiate-debt-ceiling-1406580 In a White House speech that resembled Obama’s campaign-style rhetoric from last year Treasury fills in – causing debt to decline nowLefkin 13 The May 19 debt-ceiling deadline wasn’t all that eventful because, true to No Default – multiple checks – especially in current environment How long the U.S. Treasury could continue to pay federal obligations absent No impactRobert Jervis 11, Professor in the Department of Political Science and School of International and Public Affairs at Columbia University, December 2011, and#34;Force in Our Times,and#34; Survival, Vol. 25, No. 4, p. 403-425 Even if war is still seen as evil, the security community could be dissolved No chance of war from economic decline—-best and most recent dataDaniel W. Drezner 12, Professor, The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Tufts University, October 2012, and#34;The Irony of Global Economic Governance: The System Worked,and#34; http://www.globaleconomicgovernance.org/wp-content/uploads/IR-Colloquium-MT12-Week-5_The-Irony-of-Global-Economic-Governance.pdf-http://www.globaleconomicgovernance.org/wp-content/uploads/IR-Colloquium-MT12-Week-5_The-Irony-of-Global-Economic-Governance.pdf The final outcome addresses a dog that hasn’t barked: the effect of the Great | 10/4/13 |
Debt Ceiling DA 2AC - GSU Round 2Tournament: GSU | Round: 2 | Opponent: Michigan CH | Judge: Severson Won’t pass- momentum, conclusive, no GOP supportWhat do Boehner and GOP leaders intend to do? In a way, that’s PC low and fails for fiscal fightsGreg Sargent 9-12, September 12th, 2013, and#34;The Morning Plum: Senate conservatives stick the knife in House GOP leaders,and#34; Washington Post, factiva All of this underscores a basic fact about this fall’s fiscal fights: Far and Obama not pushing- won’t even picnicOn the eve of another fiscal showdown with congressional Republicans, President Obama is outright Budget, farm bill, Syria, energy and immigration thumpWill the House pass a short-term budget this week? Maybe. Will Losers don’t necessarily lose- can still get big agenda items after a lossWeisberg 5. (Jacob Weisberg, Editor, and#34;Bush’s First Defeat: The president has lost on Social Security. How will he handle it?and#34; Slate, March 31, 2005, http://www.slate.com/id/2115141/-http://blog.al.com/breaking/2011/06/nasa_supporters_find_no_white.html) Err aff- neg impacts are media fear-mongeringGoodwin 13 ~Tracy, graduate student in political science (Stonybrook), and#34;Fear-Mongering is Despicable Regardless of who is doing it,and#34; SocioPolitical Dysfunction, 2/27, http://sociopoliticaldysfunction.wordpress.com/category/politics-2/international-relations-politics/-http://sociopoliticaldysfunction.wordpress.com/category/politics-2/international-relations-politics/~~ Then even after the sequestration showdown this week we have another fear-mongering opportunity Huge bipartisan support for the planGelb 5 – Leslie H. Gelb, President Emeritus of the Council on Foreign Relations and Anne-Marie Slaughter, Dean of the Woodrow Wilson School of International and Public Affairs, and#34;Declare Warand#34;, The Atlantic, 11-1, http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2005/11/declare-war/304301/?single_page=true Passing this legislation might not be easy. But the time is right. Liberals | 10/4/13 |
Debt Ceiling DA 2AC - GSU Round 4Tournament: GSU | Round: 4 | Opponent: Kentucky GV | Judge: Norris 2ACWon’t pass- momentum, conclusive, no GOP supportWhat do Boehner and GOP leaders intend to do? In a way, that’s PC low and fails for fiscal fightsGreg Sargent 9-12, September 12th, 2013, and#34;The Morning Plum: Senate conservatives stick the knife in House GOP leaders,and#34; Washington Post, factiva All of this underscores a basic fact about this fall’s fiscal fights: Far and Obama not pushing- won’t even picnicOn the eve of another fiscal showdown with congressional Republicans, President Obama is outright No impact- prioritizationRomina Boccia is the Grover M. Hermann Fellow in Federal Budgetary Affairs in the Thomas A. Roe Institute for Economic Policy Studies at The Heritage Foundation., 9-18-2013 http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2013/09/debt-limit-options-and-the-way-forward-http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2013/09/debt-limit-options-and-the-way-forward If Congress does not raise the debt limit by mid-October, the Treasury US econ resilientRobert Johnson 1/19/13 (CFA, director of economic analysis with Morningstar, Morningstar.com, and#34;U.S. Economy Not So Fragile After Alland#34; http://news.morningstar.com/articlenet/article.aspx?id=581616) No, the U.S. Economy Has Not Been Fragile After All¶ No impactBarnett 9 (Thomas, Senior Strategic Researcher – Naval War College, and#34;The New Rules: Security Remains Stable Amid Financial Crisisand#34;, Asset Protection Network, 8-25, http://www.aprodex.com/the-new-rules—security-remains-stable-amid-financial-crisis-398-bl.aspx) When the global financial crisis struck roughly a year ago, the blogosphere was ablaze Losers don’t necessarily lose- can still get big agenda items after a lossWeisberg 5. (Jacob Weisberg, Editor, and#34;Bush’s First Defeat: The president has lost on Social Security. How will he handle it?and#34; Slate, March 31, 2005, http://www.slate.com/id/2115141/-http://blog.al.com/breaking/2011/06/nasa_supporters_find_no_white.html) Huge bipartisan support for the planGelb 5 – Leslie H. Gelb, President Emeritus of the Council on Foreign Relations and Anne-Marie Slaughter, Dean of the Woodrow Wilson School of International and Public Affairs, and#34;Declare Warand#34;, The Atlantic, 11-1, http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2005/11/declare-war/304301/?single_page=true Passing this legislation might not be easy. But the time is right. Liberals | 10/4/13 |
Executive Restraint - 1AR - UK RR 2Tournament: UK RR | Round: 2 | Opponent: Michigan AP | Judge: Hardy GeneralBold legislative rejection of preemption’s keyBacevich 7 – Andrew, Professor of History and International Relations at Boston University and Ph.D. in American Diplomatic History from Princeton University, "Rescinding the Bush Doctrine", Boston Globe, 3-1, http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2007/03/01/rescinding_the_bush_doctrine/ RATHER THAN vainly sniping at President Bush over his management of the Iraq war, Only structural checks access signalingMartin 10 (Craig – Visiting Assistant Professor at the University of Baltimore School of Law, February, "Taking War Seriously: A Model for Constitutional Constraints on the Use of Force, in Compliance with International Law", Brooklyn Law Review 76.2, http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=100326context-http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=100326context= craig_martin) B. Image II—The Level of the State The causes of war also Perception of process outweighs substanceOwen 94 – John M. Owen, Fellow at the Center for International Security and Arms Control at Stanford University, "How Liberalism Produces Democratic Peace", International Security, 19(2), Fall, p. 96-97 THE IMPORTANCE OF PERCEPTIONS. That a state has enlightened citizens and liberal-democratic A2: OLCOLC can’t restrain the PresidentAckerman, 10 (Bruce – Sterling Professor of Law and Political Science at Yale, "The Decline and Fall of the American Republic", Harvard University Press, p. 101) But there is little reason to suppose that the OLC will be inclined to say | 10/4/13 |
Executive Restraint - 2AC - Harvard 1Tournament: Harvard | Round: 1 | Opponent: Wayne JS | Judge: Susko No durable enforcementHLR 12 – Harvard Law Review 12, "Developments in the Law: Presidential Authority," Vol. 125:2057, www.harvardlawreview.org/media/pdf/vol125_devo.pdf-http://www.harvardlawreview.org/media/pdf/vol125_devo.pdf Political checks thus can work to restrain the President by prompting executive self-binding CP keeps power with the ExecutiveSwanson 9 – David, Master’s Degree in Philosophy from the University of Virginia, Chair of the Accountability and Prosecution Working Group of United for Peace and Justice, "Dangerous Executive Orders", Op-ed News, 1/25, http://www.opednews.com/articles/Dangerous-Executive-Orders-by-David-Swanson-090125-670.html The Center for Constitutional Rights has expressed concern that President Obama’s executive order banning torture Shifting authority’s key to legitimacyMcGuinness 9 – Margaret E. McGuinness, Associate Professor at the University of Missouri Law School, "The President, Congress and The Security Council: Counterterrorism And The Use Of Force Through The Internationalist Lens", Willamette Law Review, 45 Willamette L. Rev. 417, Spring, Lexis III. Congressional Participation in U.N. Counterterrorism Policy and the Democracy Deficit No global buy-in unless Congress moves firstMoss 8 – Kenneth B., Professor and Chair of the Department of National Security Studies at the Industrial College of the Armed Forces, National Defense University, Formerly affiliated with the Siemens Corporation, the Woodrow Wilson Center, and the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Undeclared War and the Future of U.S. Foreign Policy, p. 220-221 While the Constitution’s authors would rightly view the current U.S. situation with | 10/26/13 |
Executive Restraint - 2AC - UK RR 6Tournament: UK RR | Round: 6 | Opponent: Emory JS | Judge: Russell Obama will overrule the OLCGoldsmith 13 – Goldsmith 13 – Jack Goldsmith, Henry L. Shattuck Professor at Harvard Law School, "Blaming (or Crediting) the Lawyers for Our Syria Policy", Lawfare Blog, 7-15, http://www.lawfareblog.com/2013/07/blaming-or-crediting-the-lawyers-for-our-syria-policy/ First, the Obama administration has continued controversial Bush-era interpretations of international law Doesn’t solve SOP —-Statutory check’s key to signal restraint —- states look to formal structures —- that’s Damrosch. CP fails.Scheuerman 12 – William E. Scheuerman, Professor of Political Science and West European Studies at Indiana University, "Review Essay: Emergencies, Executive Power, and the Uncertain Future of US Presidential Democracy", Law and Social Inquiry, Summer, 37 Law 26 Soc. Inquiry 743, Lexis Posner and Vermeule rely on two main claims. First, even if the president Plan’s way more crediblePildes 12 – Richard H. Pildes, Sudler Family Professor of Constitutional Law at the NYU School of Law and Co-Director of the NYU Center on Law and Security, "Book Review: Law and the President", Harvard Law Review, April, 125 Harv. L. Rev. 1381, Lexis That Posner and Vermeule miss the role of legal compliance as a powerful signal, CP keeps power with the ExecutiveSwanson 9 – David, Master’s Degree in Philosophy from the University of Virginia, Chair of the Accountability and Prosecution Working Group of United for Peace and Justice, "Dangerous Executive Orders", Op-ed News, 1/25, http://www.opednews.com/articles/Dangerous-Executive-Orders-by-David-Swanson-090125-670.html The Center for Constitutional Rights has expressed concern that President Obama’s executive order banning torture Congressional lead’s key to alliancesMoss 8 (Kenneth B., Professor and Chair of the Department of National Security Studies at the Industrial College of the Armed Forces, National Defense University, Formerly affiliated with the Siemens Corporation, the Woodrow Wilson Center, and the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Undeclared War and the Future of U.S. Foreign Policy, p. 220-221) While the Constitution’s authors would rightly view the current U.S. situation with Links to politicsMagid 13 – Aaron Magid, MA Candidate in Middle Eastern Studies at Harvard University and Staff Writer at The Jerusalem Review of Near East Affairs, "Why Obama Should Be Applauded for Consulting Congress on Syria", Daily Beast, 9-9, http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/09/09/obama-should-be-applauded-for-consulting-congress-on-syria.html Critics both domestic and foreign have been quick to lambast President Barack Obama for consulting | 10/4/13 |
Executive Restraint - 2AC - Wake 6Tournament: Wake | Round: 6 | Opponent: Georgetown AM | Judge: Brossmann No durable enforcementHLR 12 – Harvard Law Review 12, "Developments in the Law: Presidential Authority," Vol. 125:2057, www.harvardlawreview.org/media/pdf/vol125_devo.pdf-http://www.harvardlawreview.org/media/pdf/vol125_devo.pdf Political checks thus can work to restrain the President by prompting executive self-binding Congressional lead’s key to alliancesMoss 8 (Kenneth B., Professor and Chair of the Department of National Security Studies at the Industrial College of the Armed Forces, National Defense University, Formerly affiliated with the Siemens Corporation, the Woodrow Wilson Center, and the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Undeclared War and the Future of U.S. Foreign Policy, p. 220-221) While the Constitution’s authors would rightly view the current U.S. situation with Legislative check’s key to reject preemptionBacevich 7 – Andrew, Professor of History and International Relations at Boston University and Ph.D. in American Diplomatic History from Princeton University, "Rescinding the Bush Doctrine", Boston Globe, 3-1, http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2007/03/01/rescinding_the_bush_doctrine/ RATHER THAN vainly sniping at President Bush over his management of the Iraq war, Preemption’s model causes global conflict—-goes nuclearSteinberg 2 – James B. Steinberg, Vice President and Director of Foreign Policy at the Brookings Institution, Michael E. O’Hanlon and Susan E. Rice, "The New National Security Strategy and Preemption", Brookings Policy Brief Series, December, http://www.brookings.edu/research/papers/2002/12/terrorism-ohanlon The Dangers of Legitimating Preemption A final concern relates to the impact of the precedent Only Congress can decide warmaking – anything else wrecks civilian control of the militaryBarno 13 The Sept. 6 commentary by retired Maj. Gen. Robert H. Scales | 11/21/13 |
Executive Restraint CP - 1AR - Clay 6Tournament: Clay | Round: 6 | Opponent: Wake MS | Judge: Barouch Only legal limits effectively shift Executive practiceHuq 12 – Aziz Z. Huq, Assistant Professor of Law at the University of Chicago Law School, "Review: Binding the Executive (by Law or by Politics)", University of Chicago Law Review, 79 U. Chi. L. Rev. 777, Spring, Lexis III. The Fragility of Politics Trade-off’s zero-sum and accesses the DA moreBarron 8 – David J. Barron, Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and Martin S. Lederman, Visiting Professor of Law at the Georgetown University Law Center, "The Commander in Chief at the Lowest Ebb — A Constitutional History", Harvard Law Review, February, 121 Harv. L. Rev. 941, Lexis In a companion Article, we described many of the structural forces responsible for this | 10/6/13 |
Executive Restraint CP - 1AR - Wake 8Tournament: Wake | Round: 8 | Opponent: NU OP | Judge: Andres Gannon CredibilityIran’ won’t trust the CP without Congressional codificationGaouette 13 – Nicole Gaouette, Reporter at Bloomberg News, "Shutdown Undercuts Obama Defining America’s Global Role", Bloomberg News, 10-2, http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-10-02/shutdown-undercuts-obama-defining-america-s-global-role.html ’Significant Pall’ "It does cast a very significant pall over America’s credibility with Codification’s keyGrotto, 7 (March 2007, Joseph Cirincione, Senior Fellow and Director for Nuclear Policy at the Center ¶ for American Progress, Andrew Grotto, Senior National Security Analyst at the Center for American ¶ Progress, where he specializes in U.S. strategic policy and the proliferation of nuclear ¶ weapon, Center for American Progress, "Contain and Engage: A New Strategy for Resolving the Nuclear Crisis with Iran,"¶ http://www.americanprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/issues/2007/02/pdf/iran_report.pdf-http://www.americanprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/issues/2007/02/pdf/iran_report.pdf) Implementing this proposal will require changes to U.S. law and administrative practice that restrict U.S. trade with Iran and sanction foreign entities from investing in Iran’s oil infrastructure.73 Iran will not take the proposal seriously unless it perceives that United States Congress supports it. Accordingly, the Bush administration will need to work closely with Congress. | 12/14/13 |
Executive Restraint CP - 2AC - CSUF DubsTournament: CSUF | Round: Doubles | Opponent: Kentucky GR | Judge: JP, Hardy, Lucas-Bolin No durable enforcementHLR 12 – Harvard Law Review 12, "Developments in the Law: Presidential Authority," Vol. 125:2057, www.harvardlawreview.org/media/pdf/vol125_devo.pdf-http://www.harvardlawreview.org/media/pdf/vol125_devo.pdf Political checks thus can work to restrain the President by prompting executive self-binding Statutory check’s key to signal restraint —- states look to formal structures —- that’s Damrosch. CP fails.Scheuerman 12 – William E. Scheuerman, Professor of Political Science and West European Studies at Indiana University, "Review Essay: Emergencies, Executive Power, and the Uncertain Future of US Presidential Democracy", Law and Social Inquiry, Summer, 37 Law 26 Soc. Inquiry 743, Lexis Posner and Vermeule rely on two main claims. First, even if the president ====Plan’s way more credible==== That Posner and Vermeule miss the role of legal compliance as a powerful signal, Iran won’t trust the pledge without Congressional backingPillar 13 – Dr. Paul R. Pillar, Professor and Senior Fellow at the Center for Security Studies at Georgetown University and Nonresident Senior Fellow in Foreign Policy at the Brookings Institution, Ph.D. in Politics from Princeton University, MA in Politics from Oxford University, "Iran and the Quelling of Congressional Troublemaking", The National Interest, 10-17, http://nationalinterest.org/blog/paul-pillar/iran-the-quelling-congressional-troublemaking-9258 The administration will need Congressional cooperation to undo sanctions that were erected supposedly to induce | 1/8/14 |
Executive Restraint CP - 2AC - Clay 2Tournament: Clay | Round: 2 | Opponent: Cal SW | Judge: Roark No durable enforcementHLR 12 – Harvard Law Review 12, "Developments in the Law: Presidential Authority," Vol. 125:2057, www.harvardlawreview.org/media/pdf/vol125_devo.pdf-http://www.harvardlawreview.org/media/pdf/vol125_devo.pdf Political checks thus can work to restrain the President by prompting executive self-binding Statutory check’s key to signal restraint —- states look to formal structures —- that’s Damrosch. CP fails.Scheuerman 12 – William E. Scheuerman, Professor of Political Science and West European Studies at Indiana University, "Review Essay: Emergencies, Executive Power, and the Uncertain Future of US Presidential Democracy", Law and Social Inquiry, Summer, 37 Law 26 Soc. Inquiry 743, Lexis Posner and Vermeule rely on two main claims. First, even if the president Plan’s way more crediblePildes 12 – Richard H. Pildes, Sudler Family Professor of Constitutional Law at the NYU School of Law and Co-Director of the NYU Center on Law and Security, "Book Review: Law and the President", Harvard Law Review, April, 125 Harv. L. Rev. 1381, Lexis That Posner and Vermeule miss the role of legal compliance as a powerful signal, Congressional lead’s key to alliancesMoss 8 (Kenneth B., Professor and Chair of the Department of National Security Studies at the Industrial College of the Armed Forces, National Defense University, Formerly affiliated with the Siemens Corporation, the Woodrow Wilson Center, and the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Undeclared War and the Future of U.S. Foreign Policy, p. 220-221) While the Constitution’s authors would rightly view the current U.S. situation with CP gets ignored and doesn’t bindPosner, 12 (Eric A. – Kirkland 26 Ellis Professor at the University of Chicago Law School, Winter, "Reflections On The Law Of September 11: A Ten-Year Retrospective: Deference To The Executive In The United States After September 11: Congress, The Courts, And The Office Of Legal Counsel", Harvard Journal of Law 26 Public Policy, 35 Harv. J.L. 26 Pub. Pol’y 213, Lexis) B. The OLC as a Constraint on the Executive A number of scholars have | 10/5/13 |
Executive Restraint CP - 2AC - Clay 6Tournament: Clay | Round: 6 | Opponent: Wake MS | Judge: Barouch No durable enforcementHLR 12 – Harvard Law Review 12, "Developments in the Law: Presidential Authority," Vol. 125:2057, www.harvardlawreview.org/media/pdf/vol125_devo.pdf-http://www.harvardlawreview.org/media/pdf/vol125_devo.pdf Political checks thus can work to restrain the President by prompting executive self-binding Statutory check’s key to signal restraint —- states look to formal structures —- that’s Damrosch. CP fails.Scheuerman 12 – William E. Scheuerman, Professor of Political Science and West European Studies at Indiana University, "Review Essay: Emergencies, Executive Power, and the Uncertain Future of US Presidential Democracy", Law and Social Inquiry, Summer, 37 Law 26 Soc. Inquiry 743, Lexis Posner and Vermeule rely on two main claims. First, even if the president Plan’s way more crediblePildes 12 – Richard H. Pildes, Sudler Family Professor of Constitutional Law at the NYU School of Law and Co-Director of the NYU Center on Law and Security, "Book Review: Law and the President", Harvard Law Review, April, 125 Harv. L. Rev. 1381, Lexis That Posner and Vermeule miss the role of legal compliance as a powerful signal, Congressional lead’s key to alliances and joint operationsMoss 8 (Kenneth B., Professor and Chair of the Department of National Security Studies at the Industrial College of the Armed Forces, National Defense University, Formerly affiliated with the Siemens Corporation, the Woodrow Wilson Center, and the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Undeclared War and the Future of U.S. Foreign Policy, p. 220-221) While the Constitution’s authors would rightly view the current U.S. situation with Obama will overrule the OLCGoldsmith 13 – Goldsmith 13 – Jack Goldsmith, Henry L. Shattuck Professor at Harvard Law School, "Blaming (or Crediting) the Lawyers for Our Syria Policy", Lawfare Blog, 7-15, http://www.lawfareblog.com/2013/07/blaming-or-crediting-the-lawyers-for-our-syria-policy/ First, the Obama administration has continued controversial Bush-era interpretations of international law | 10/6/13 |
Executive Restraint CP - 2AC - Clay 7Tournament: Clay | Round: 7 | Opponent: USC PV | Judge: Revelins No durable enforcementHLR 12 – Harvard Law Review 12, "Developments in the Law: Presidential Authority," Vol. 125:2057, www.harvardlawreview.org/media/pdf/vol125_devo.pdf-http://www.harvardlawreview.org/media/pdf/vol125_devo.pdf Political checks thus can work to restrain the President by prompting executive self-binding Statutory check’s key to signal restraint —- states look to formal structures —- that’s Damrosch. CP fails.Scheuerman 12 – William E. Scheuerman, Professor of Political Science and West European Studies at Indiana University, "Review Essay: Emergencies, Executive Power, and the Uncertain Future of US Presidential Democracy", Law and Social Inquiry, Summer, 37 Law 26 Soc. Inquiry 743, Lexis Posner and Vermeule rely on two main claims. First, even if the president Plan’s way more crediblePildes 12 – Richard H. Pildes, Sudler Family Professor of Constitutional Law at the NYU School of Law and Co-Director of the NYU Center on Law and Security, "Book Review: Law and the President", Harvard Law Review, April, 125 Harv. L. Rev. 1381, Lexis That Posner and Vermeule miss the role of legal compliance as a powerful signal, Only legal limits effectively shift Executive practiceHuq 12 – Aziz Z. Huq, Assistant Professor of Law at the University of Chicago Law School, "Review: Binding the Executive (by Law or by Politics)", University of Chicago Law Review, 79 U. Chi. L. Rev. 777, Spring, Lexis III. The Fragility of Politics This Part turns to the second element of the Political constraints failCole 11 – David Cole, Professor at the Georgetown University Law Center, "Where Liberty Lies: Civil Society and Individual Rights After 9/11", The Wayne Law Review, Winter, 57 Wayne L. Rev. 1203, Lexis In my view, Posner and Vermeule simultaneously underestimate the constraining force of law and | 11/5/13 |
Executive Restraint CP - 2AC - GSU DoublesTournament: GSU | Round: Doubles | Opponent: Wake HS | Judge: Cohn, Paul, Kall No durable enforcementHLR 12 – Harvard Law Review 12, "Developments in the Law: Presidential Authority," Vol. 125:2057, www.harvardlawreview.org/media/pdf/vol125_devo.pdf-http://www.harvardlawreview.org/media/pdf/vol125_devo.pdf Political checks thus can work to restrain the President by prompting executive self-binding Consultation is non-binding – the executive will circumvent when congress says no – triggers bad interventions, ineffective warfighting, and reinforces presidential war powersPosner 13(Eric, Kirkland and Ellis Professor of Law at the University of Chicago Law School. An editor of The Journal of Legal Studies, "Obama Is Only Making His War Powers Mightier," September 3, http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/view_from_chicago/2013/09/obama_going_to_congress_on_syria_he_s_actually_strengthening_the_war_powers.html) President Obama’s surprise announcement that he will ask Congress for approval of a military attack Doesn’t solve SOP —-Statutory check’s key to signal restraint —- states look to formal structures —- that’s Damrosch. CP fails.Scheuerman 12 – William E. Scheuerman, Professor of Political Science and West European Studies at Indiana University, "Review Essay: Emergencies, Executive Power, and the Uncertain Future of US Presidential Democracy", Law and Social Inquiry, Summer, 37 Law 26 Soc. Inquiry 743, Lexis Posner and Vermeule rely on two main claims. First, even if the president Plan’s way more crediblePildes 12 – Richard H. Pildes, Sudler Family Professor of Constitutional Law at the NYU School of Law and Co-Director of the NYU Center on Law and Security, "Book Review: Law and the President", Harvard Law Review, April, 125 Harv. L. Rev. 1381, Lexis That Posner and Vermeule miss the role of legal compliance as a powerful signal, Links to politicsMagid 13 – Aaron Magid, MA Candidate in Middle Eastern Studies at Harvard University and Staff Writer at The Jerusalem Review of Near East Affairs, "Why Obama Should Be Applauded for Consulting Congress on Syria", Daily Beast, 9-9, http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/09/09/obama-should-be-applauded-for-consulting-congress-on-syria.html Critics both domestic and foreign have been quick to lambast President Barack Obama for consulting | 9/29/13 |
Executive Restraint CP - 2AC - GSU DoublesTournament: GSU | Round: Doubles | Opponent: Wake HS | Judge: Cohn, Paul, Kall No durable enforcementHLR 12 – Harvard Law Review 12, "Developments in the Law: Presidential Authority," Vol. 125:2057, www.harvardlawreview.org/media/pdf/vol125_devo.pdf-http://www.harvardlawreview.org/media/pdf/vol125_devo.pdf Political checks thus can work to restrain the President by prompting executive self-binding Consultation is non-binding – the executive will circumvent when congress says no – triggers bad interventions, ineffective warfighting, and reinforces presidential war powersPosner 13(Eric, Kirkland and Ellis Professor of Law at the University of Chicago Law School. An editor of The Journal of Legal Studies, "Obama Is Only Making His War Powers Mightier," September 3, http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/view_from_chicago/2013/09/obama_going_to_congress_on_syria_he_s_actually_strengthening_the_war_powers.html) President Obama’s surprise announcement that he will ask Congress for approval of a military attack Doesn’t solve SOP —-Statutory check’s key to signal restraint —- states look to formal structures —- that’s Damrosch. CP fails.Scheuerman 12 – William E. Scheuerman, Professor of Political Science and West European Studies at Indiana University, "Review Essay: Emergencies, Executive Power, and the Uncertain Future of US Presidential Democracy", Law and Social Inquiry, Summer, 37 Law 26 Soc. Inquiry 743, Lexis Posner and Vermeule rely on two main claims. First, even if the president Plan’s way more crediblePildes 12 – Richard H. Pildes, Sudler Family Professor of Constitutional Law at the NYU School of Law and Co-Director of the NYU Center on Law and Security, "Book Review: Law and the President", Harvard Law Review, April, 125 Harv. L. Rev. 1381, Lexis That Posner and Vermeule miss the role of legal compliance as a powerful signal, Links to politicsMagid 13 – Aaron Magid, MA Candidate in Middle Eastern Studies at Harvard University and Staff Writer at The Jerusalem Review of Near East Affairs, "Why Obama Should Be Applauded for Consulting Congress on Syria", Daily Beast, 9-9, http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/09/09/obama-should-be-applauded-for-consulting-congress-on-syria.html Critics both domestic and foreign have been quick to lambast President Barack Obama for consulting | 9/29/13 |
Executive Restraint CP - 2AC - Indiana 5Tournament: Indiana | Round: 5 | Opponent: Iowa HK | Judge: Vats No durable enforcementHLR 12 – Harvard Law Review 12, "Developments in the Law: Presidential Authority," Vol. 125:2057, www.harvardlawreview.org/media/pdf/vol125_devo.pdf Political checks thus can work to restrain the President by prompting executive self-binding Congress must be the first moverSchumer 7 – Charles E. Schumer, JD from Harvard Law School, AB in Politics from Harvard College, Senior United States Senator from New York, Youngest Representative in the History of New York State, "Under Attack: Congressional Power in the Twenty-First Century", Harvard Law 26 Policy Review, 1(1), http://web.archive.org/web/20120625034444/http://www.hlpronline.com/Vol1No1/schumer.pdf The momentous election of November 7, 2006, sent a clear message that voters | 1/26/14 |
Executive Restraint CP - 2AC - UK RR 2Tournament: UK RR | Round: 2 | Opponent: Michigan AP | Judge: Hardy Obama will overrule the OLCGoldsmith 13 – Goldsmith 13 – Jack Goldsmith, Henry L. Shattuck Professor at Harvard Law School, and#34;Blaming (or Crediting) the Lawyers for Our Syria Policyand#34;, Lawfare Blog, 7-15, http://www.lawfareblog.com/2013/07/blaming-or-crediting-the-lawyers-for-our-syria-policy/ First, the Obama administration has continued controversial Bush-era interpretations of international law Statutory check’s key to signal restraint —- states look to formal structures —- that’s Damrosch. CP fails.Scheuerman 12 – William E. Scheuerman, Professor of Political Science and West European Studies at Indiana University, and#34;Review Essay: Emergencies, Executive Power, and the Uncertain Future of US Presidential Democracyand#34;, Law and Social Inquiry, Summer, 37 Law 26 Soc. Inquiry 743, Lexis Posner and Vermeule rely on two main claims. First, even if the president Plan’s way more crediblePildes 12 – Richard H. Pildes, Sudler Family Professor of Constitutional Law at the NYU School of Law and Co-Director of the NYU Center on Law and Security, and#34;Book Review: Law and the Presidentand#34;, Harvard Law Review, April, 125 Harv. L. Rev. 1381, Lexis That Posner and Vermeule miss the role of legal compliance as a powerful signal, CP keeps power with the ExecutiveSwanson 9 – David, Master’s Degree in Philosophy from the University of Virginia, Chair of the Accountability and Prosecution Working Group of United for Peace and Justice, and#34;Dangerous Executive Ordersand#34;, Op-ed News, 1/25, http://www.opednews.com/articles/Dangerous-Executive-Orders-by-David-Swanson-090125-670.html The Center for Constitutional Rights has expressed concern that President Obama’s executive order banning torture Congressional lead’s key to alliancesMoss 8 (Kenneth B., Professor and Chair of the Department of National Security Studies at the Industrial College of the Armed Forces, National Defense University, Formerly affiliated with the Siemens Corporation, the Woodrow Wilson Center, and the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Undeclared War and the Future of U.S. Foreign Policy, p. 220-221) While the Constitution’s authors would rightly view the current U.S. situation with | 10/4/13 |
Executive Restraint CP - 2AC - USC 4Tournament: USC | Round: 4 | Opponent: UNLV RV | Judge: Nikolic Not Solve Iran – CredibilityIran’ won’t trust the CP without Congressional codificationGaouette 13 – Nicole Gaouette, Reporter at Bloomberg News, "Shutdown Undercuts Obama Defining America’s Global Role", Bloomberg News, 10-2, http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-10-02/shutdown-undercuts-obama-defining-america-s-global-role.html ’Significant Pall’ "It does cast a very significant pall over America’s credibility with Codification’s keyGrotto, 7 (March 2007, Joseph Cirincione, Senior Fellow and Director for Nuclear Policy at the Center ¶ for American Progress, Andrew Grotto, Senior National Security Analyst at the Center for American ¶ Progress, where he specializes in U.S. strategic policy and the proliferation of nuclear ¶ weapon, Center for American Progress, "Contain and Engage: A New Strategy for Resolving the Nuclear Crisis with Iran,"¶ http://www.americanprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/issues/2007/02/pdf/iran_report.pdf-http://www.americanprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/issues/2007/02/pdf/iran_report.pdf) Implementing this proposal will require changes to U.S. law and administrative practice that restrict U.S. trade with Iran and sanction foreign entities from investing in Iran’s oil infrastructure.73 Iran will not take the proposal seriously unless it perceives that United States Congress supports it. Accordingly, the Bush administration will need to work closely with Congress. Not Solve Iran – SignalFormalizing the restriction through statute is key to signaling and prevents bluffingWaxman 13 – Matthew Waxman, Law Professor at Columbia Law School, "The Constitutional Power To Threaten War", Yale Law Journal, 10-1, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2316777 Even if Congress already wields informal political influence over threatened force, more potent and Diplomacy – A2: Congress Will Authorize Iran WarNot offense—-if they’ll authorize, they’d do that no matter what—-plan makes no differenceDefinitely notLobe, 9/21 - best known for his coverage of U.S. foreign policy, particularly the neo-conservative influence in the Bush administration. The Washington Bureau Chief of the international news agency Inter Press Service (IPS), Lobe has also written for Al Jazeera English, Foreign Policy In Focus, Alternet, Tompaine.com (Jim, "Hard Times for Iran Hawks, Inter Press Service, http://www.lobelog.com/hard-times-for-iran-hawks/) As Congress reconvened, it became clear that the White House would be lucky to | 1/4/14 |
Executive Restraint CP - 2AC - USC 4Tournament: USC | Round: 4 | Opponent: UNLV RV | Judge: Nikolic Iran won’t trust the pledge without Congressional backingPillar 13 – Dr. Paul R. Pillar, Professor and Senior Fellow at the Center for Security Studies at Georgetown University and Nonresident Senior Fellow in Foreign Policy at the Brookings Institution, Ph.D. in Politics from Princeton University, MA in Politics from Oxford University, "Iran and the Quelling of Congressional Troublemaking", The National Interest, 10-17, http://nationalinterest.org/blog/paul-pillar/iran-the-quelling-congressional-troublemaking-9258 The administration will need Congressional cooperation to undo sanctions that were erected supposedly to induce Informal restraint isn’t perceivedWaxman 13 – Matthew Waxman, Law Professor at Columbia Law School, "The Constitutional Power To Threaten War", Yale Law Journal, 10-1, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2316777 II. Democratic Checks on Threatened Force The previous Parts of this Article showed that Threat alone makes U.S. unreliable, even if actual withdrawal never occurs—-that’s De Groot. Other countries see allocation of powerMartin 5 – Lisa L. Martin, Professor of Government at Harvard University, "U.S. Military Commitments: Multilateralism and Treaties", April, http://files.wcfia.harvard.edu/936__US_military_commitments.pdf Perhaps even more telling, the evasion hypothesis completely neglects the process of negotiation with C) Restraint fails—-formal checks keyHealy 00 – Gene Healy, Vice President at the Cato Institute and JD from University of Chicago Law School, "Arrogance of Power Reborn: The Imperial Presidency and Foreign Policy in the Clinton Years", Cato Policy Analysis No. 389, 12-13, http://www.cato.org/publications/policy-analysis/arrogance-power-reborn-imperial-presidency-foreign-policy-clinton-years Congressional courage of the kind needed to reclaim the war power will not be forthcoming Groupthink Net BenExecutive decision making more likely to cause groupthink—distorts policy—cut off flow of info, downplay contrary views, no think long-term, underestimate risks, fail to develop contingency plansStreichler, 8 (Stuart – Adjunct Faculty at Seattle University School of Law and Ph.D. – Johns Hopkins University and J.D. – University of Michigan Law School, "Mad about Yoo, or, Why Worry about the Next Unconstitutional War?", Journal of Law 26 Politics XXIV.93, http://faculty.washington.edu/sstreich/documents/madaboutyoo.pdf) Yoo expresses no doubt that the president’s capacity to make decisions in foreign affairs and Nate Dogg and Congress gonna regulateMcManus 13 – Doyle McManus, Washington Bureau Chief of the Los Angeles Times, MA and Fullbright Scholar at the University of Brussels, Four-Time Winner of the National Press Club’s Edwin Hood Award for Reporting on U.S. Foreign Policy, Winner of Georgetown University’s Weintal Prize, "In America, Not Isolationism But Skepticism", Los Angeles Times, 9-15, http://www.latimes.com/opinion/commentary/la-oe-mcmanus-column-congress-obama-and-syria-20130915,0,3944454.column Opposition in Congress to a presidential request to use force has a long history. They won’t authorize IranYork, 9/18 (Byron, "Sen. Lindsey Graham to seek authorization for U.S. attack on Iran" Washington Examiner, http://washingtonexaminer.com/sen.-lindsey-graham-to-seek-authorization-for-u.s.-attack-on-iran/article/2536040) Sen. Lindsey Graham is one of the strongest advocates of an American military strike | 1/4/14 |
Executive Restraint CP - 2AC - Wake 8Tournament: Wake | Round: 8 | Opponent: NU OP | Judge: Andres Gannon Iran won’t trust the pledge without Congressional backingPillar 13 – Dr. Paul R. Pillar, Professor and Senior Fellow at the Center for Security Studies at Georgetown University and Nonresident Senior Fellow in Foreign Policy at the Brookings Institution, Ph.D. in Politics from Princeton University, MA in Politics from Oxford University, "Iran and the Quelling of Congressional Troublemaking", The National Interest, 10-17, http://nationalinterest.org/blog/paul-pillar/iran-the-quelling-congressional-troublemaking-9258 The administration will need Congressional cooperation to undo sanctions that were erected supposedly to induce Informal restraint isn’t perceivedWaxman 13 – Matthew Waxman, Law Professor at Columbia Law School, "The Constitutional Power To Threaten War", Yale Law Journal, 10-1, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2316777 II. Democratic Checks on Threatened Force The previous Parts of this Article showed that Congress must be the first mover—-Iran’s the test caseFoley 6 – Brian J. Foley, Professor of Law at Florida Coastal School of Law, "Limiting War by Process: Congress, the UN, and Iran", Jurist, 5-25, http://jurist.org/forum/2006/05/limiting-war-by-process-congress-un.php Congress appears equally unlikely to ask tough-minded questions this time, despite the | 12/14/13 |
Executive Restraint CP 1AR - GSU Round 2Tournament: GSU | Round: 2 | Opponent: Michigan CH | Judge: Severson Executive Restraint CP – Ext – Not Solve SOP – Signal 1ARBold legislative rejection of preemption’s keyBacevich 7 – Andrew, Professor of History and International Relations at Boston University and Ph.D. in American Diplomatic History from Princeton University, and#34;Rescinding the Bush Doctrineand#34;, Boston Globe, 3-1, http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2007/03/01/rescinding_the_bush_doctrine/ Rather than vainly sniping at President Bush over his management of the Iraq war, the Democratic-AND Only structural checks access signalingMartin 10 (Craig – Visiting Assistant Professor at the University of Baltimore School of Law, February, and#34;Taking War Seriously: A Model for Constitutional Constraints on the Use of Force, in Compliance with International Lawand#34;, Brooklyn Law Review 76.2, http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=100326context-http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=100326context= craig_martin) The causes of war also operate at the level of the state itself. Again Executive Restraint CP – Ext – No Durable EnforcementOnly legal limits effectively shift Executive practiceHuq 12 – Aziz Z. Huq, Assistant Professor of Law at the University of Chicago Law School, and#34;Review: Binding the Executive (by Law or by Politics)and#34;, University of Chicago Law Review, 79 U. Chi. L. Rev. 777, Spring, Lexis This Part turns to the second element of the strong law/politics dichotomy: Political constraints failCole 11 – David Cole, Professor at the Georgetown University Law Center, and#34;Where Liberty Lies: Civil Society and Individual Rights After 9/11and#34;, The Wayne Law Review, Winter, 57 Wayne L. Rev. 1203, Lexis In my view, Posner and Vermeule simultaneously underestimate the constraining force of law and Executive Restraint CP (OLC Mechanism) – Ext – Can’t Check PrezOLC can’t restrain the PresidentAckerman, 10 (Bruce – Sterling Professor of Law and Political Science at Yale, and#34;The Decline and Fall of the American Republicand#34;, Harvard University Press, p. 101) But there is little reason to suppose that the OLC will be inclined to say Underestimates the OLC attachment to the president—causes constant authorization to use force and diminishes precedentDehn, 10 (John C. – Assistant Professor at the United States Military Academy and J.S.D. candidate at Columbia Law School, 11/12, and#34;Institutional Advocacy, Constitutional Obligations, and Professional Responsibilities: Arguments for Government Lawyering Without Glassesand#34;, Columbia Law Review Sidebar, http://www.columbialaw-http:www.columbialaw/ review.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/73_Dehn.pdf) This response addresses only the normative theoretical inquiry and makes one essential point: Professor | 10/4/13 |
Executive Restraint CP 2AC - GSU Round 2Tournament: GSU | Round: 2 | Opponent: Michigan CH | Judge: Severson Executive Restraint CP – 2ACNo durable enforcementHLR 12 – Harvard Law Review 12, and#34;Developments in the Law: Presidential Authority,and#34; Vol. 125:2057, www.harvardlawreview.org/media/pdf/vol125_devo.pdf-http://www.harvardlawreview.org/media/pdf/vol125_devo.pdf Political checks thus can work to restrain the President by prompting executive self-binding Statutory check’s key to signal restraint —- states look to formal structures —- that’s Damrosch. CP fails.Scheuerman 12 – William E. Scheuerman, Professor of Political Science and West European Studies at Indiana University, and#34;Review Essay: Emergencies, Executive Power, and the Uncertain Future of US Presidential Democracyand#34;, Law and Social Inquiry, Summer, 37 Law 26 Soc. Inquiry 743, Lexis Posner and Vermeule rely on two main claims. First, even if the president ====Plan’s way more credible==== That Posner and Vermeule miss the role of legal compliance as a powerful signal, CP keeps power with the ExecutiveSwanson 9 – David, Master’s Degree in Philosophy from the University of Virginia, Chair of the Accountability and Prosecution Working Group of United for Peace and Justice, and#34;Dangerous Executive Ordersand#34;, Op-ed News, 1/25, http://www.opednews.com/articles/Dangerous-Executive-Orders-by-David-Swanson-090125-670.html The Center for Constitutional Rights has expressed concern that President Obama’s executive order banning torture Congressional lead’s key to alliancesMoss 8 (Kenneth B., Professor and Chair of the Department of National Security Studies at the Industrial College of the Armed Forces, National Defense University, Formerly affiliated with the Siemens Corporation, the Woodrow Wilson Center, and the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Undeclared War and the Future of U.S. Foreign Policy, p. 220-221) While the Constitution’s authors would rightly view the current U.S. situation with Obama will overrule the OLCGoldsmith 13 – Goldsmith 13 – Jack Goldsmith, Henry L. Shattuck Professor at Harvard Law School, and#34;Blaming (or Crediting) the Lawyers for Our Syria Policyand#34;, Lawfare Blog, 7-15, http://www.lawfareblog.com/2013/07/blaming-or-crediting-the-lawyers-for-our-syria-policy/ First, the Obama administration has continued controversial Bush-era interpretations of international law CP gets ignored and doesn’t bindPosner, 12 (Eric A. – Kirkland 26 Ellis Professor at the University of Chicago Law School, Winter, and#34;Reflections On The Law Of September 11: A Ten-Year Retrospective: Deference To The Executive In The United States After September 11: Congress, The Courts, And The Office Of Legal Counseland#34;, Harvard Journal of Law 26 Public Policy, 35 Harv. J.L. 26 Pub. Pol’y 213, Lexis) B. The OLC as a Constraint on the Executive | 10/4/13 |
Executive Restraint CP 2AC - GSU Round 7Tournament: GSU | Round: 7 | Opponent: Georgetown AM | Judge: Hays Watson Executive Restraint CP – 2ACNo durable enforcementHLR 12 – Harvard Law Review 12, and#34;Developments in the Law: Presidential Authority,and#34; Vol. 125:2057, www.harvardlawreview.org/media/pdf/vol125_devo.pdf-http://www.harvardlawreview.org/media/pdf/vol125_devo.pdf Political checks thus can work to restrain the President by prompting executive self-binding CP’s object fiat because it fiats the President —- ruins Aff ground because it devolves into and#34;no warand#34; and kills education because it avoids the central question of how to restrain the PresidentDoesn’t solve SOP —-Statutory check’s key to signal restraint —- states look to formal structures —- that’s Damrosch. CP fails.Scheuerman 12 – William E. Scheuerman, Professor of Political Science and West European Studies at Indiana University, and#34;Review Essay: Emergencies, Executive Power, and the Uncertain Future of US Presidential Democracyand#34;, Law and Social Inquiry, Summer, 37 Law 26 Soc. Inquiry 743, Lexis Posner and Vermeule rely on two main claims. First, even if the president ====Plan’s way more credible==== That Posner and Vermeule miss the role of legal compliance as a powerful signal, Only Congressional action stops preclusive authority that spills over to complete Executive control. Congress must be the first mover or it loses relevance —- that’s Barron and HansenCP keeps power with the ExecutiveSwanson 9 – David, Master’s Degree in Philosophy from the University of Virginia, Chair of the Accountability and Prosecution Working Group of United for Peace and Justice, and#34;Dangerous Executive Ordersand#34;, Op-ed News, 1/25, http://www.opednews.com/articles/Dangerous-Executive-Orders-by-David-Swanson-090125-670.html The Center for Constitutional Rights has expressed concern that President Obama’s executive order banning torture | 10/4/13 |
Farm Bill DA - 1AR - Wake 8Tournament: Wake | Round: 8 | Opponent: NU OP | Judge: Andres Gannon ThumpinWont even make the docket—healthcare swampsBurlij and Bowman 10/25 The day after Congress approved a measure to end the government shutdown and raise the It’s a Katrina momentMike Dorning, Business Week, 10/26/13, Obamacare Website Flaws Imperil President’s Activist Agenda, www.businessweek.com/news/2013-10-25/obamacare-website-flaws-imperil-activist-agenda-president-backs The rocky debut of the insurance exchanges at the heart of President Barack Obama’s health Obama pushing EPA standards on climate changeBen Geman, The Hill, 11-8-2013 http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/e2-wire/189754-obama-grasps-for-climate-legacy-as-second-term-agenda-crumbles-http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/e2-wire/189754-obama-grasps-for-climate-legacy-as-second-term-agenda-crumbles President Obama has a chance to craft a second-term legacy on climate change | 12/14/13 |
Farm Bill DA - 2AC - Wake 8Tournament: Wake | Round: 8 | Opponent: NU OP | Judge: Andres Gannon Won’t pass but extensions solvesStu Ellis, FarmGate Blog 11-15-2013 http://www.cattlenetwork.com/cattle-news/Farm-bill-When-and-how-will-it-be-completed-232067501.html-http://www.cattlenetwork.com/cattle-news/Farm-bill-When-and-how-will-it-be-completed-232067501.html "We can’t do much about it. We just have to sit and wait Obama PC meaningless- top DemsPolitico, 11-6-2013 http://www.politico.com/story/2013/11/the-farm-bill-a-dickens-tale-99457.html-http://www.politico.com/story/2013/11/the-farm-bill-a-dickens-tale-99457.html At the opening session of the House-Senate farm bill conference last week, Climate change, health care flaws and nominations thump the DAPresident Obama, fresh off a trouncing of congressional Republicans over the government shutdown, Iran fights nowSolomon 10-25 – Jay Solomon, Foreign Affairs Reporter at the Wall Street Journal, "White House, Congress Clash on Iran: The Obama Administration Is Arguing that Diplomatic Efforts Need More Time", Wall Street Journal, 2013, http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304682504579157983219813894 White House, Congress Clash on IranThe White House is pressing Even international climate change solutions failLomborg, 12 (Professor Copenhagen Business School, 11-5-’12 (Bjørn, "Climate Course Correction" Foreign Policy, http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2012/11/05/climate_course_correction-http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2012/11/05/climate_course_correction) Whether Barack Obama or Mitt Romney finds himself working from the Oval Office over the | 12/14/13 |
Farm Bill DA - 2AC - Wake QTournament: Wake | Round: Quarters | Opponent: Northwestern MV | Judge: Seth Gannon, Kallmyer, Brovero, Weiner, Feldman Won’t pass – election, deep divisions – and short term extension is inevitable and solvesReuters 11/11/13, "U.S. Congress has about 50/50 chance of passing farm bill in 2013 –analyst," http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/11/12/usa-agriculture-farm-bill-idUSL2N0IX01T20131112-http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/11/12/usa-agriculture-farm-bill-idUSL2N0IX01T20131112 Nov 11 (Reuters) - The chances of the U.S. Congress Climate change, health care flaws and nominations thump the DAPresident Obama, fresh off a trouncing of congressional Republicans over the government shutdown, Obama supports itKramer 13 – Kramer 9/17/13 http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2013/09/17/israel-likes-its-u-s-presidents-strong-2/-http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2013/09/17/israel-likes-its-u-s-presidents-strong-2/ Martin Kramer is President of Shalem College, a new undergraduate liberal arts college in Jerusalem. An authority on contemporary Islam and Arab politics, Kramer earned his undergraduate and doctoral degrees in Near Eastern Studies from Princeton University. During a twenty-five-year academic career at Tel Aviv University, he directed the Moshe Dayan Center for Middle Eastern and African Studies. Kramer has taught as a visiting professor at Brandeis University, the University of Chicago, Cornell University, Georgetown University, and The Johns Hopkins University (SAIS). He has served as a visiting fellow at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars in Washington, The Washington Institute for Near East Policy, and Harvard University’s Olin Institute for Strategic Studies. "Too big for business as usual" In light of this history, it’s Iran-specific restrictions are popularPolitico 7 – "Congressmen to Require Authorization of Force Against Iran", 1-29, http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0107/2530.html Concerned about the way the Bush administration moved against Iraq, a group of congressmen Iran fights nowSolomon 10-25 – Jay Solomon, Foreign Affairs Reporter at the Wall Street Journal, "White House, Congress Clash on Iran: The Obama Administration Is Arguing that Diplomatic Efforts Need More Time", Wall Street Journal, 2013, http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304682504579157983219813894 White House, Congress Clash on Iran The White House is pressing Congress to hold Price volatility inevitable – shocks not passed on to consumersForbes, ’11~"Highly Leveraged Agriculture Will Keep Food Prices Volatile And High," 9-9, http://www.forbes.com/sites/afontevecchia/2011/09/09/highly-leveraged-agriculture-will-keep-food-prices-volatile-and-high/-http://www.forbes.com/sites/afontevecchia/2011/09/09/highly-leveraged-agriculture-will-keep-food-prices-volatile-and-high/~~ With food prices remaining stubbornly high near record levels, price swings and volatility have | 12/14/13 |
Fear of Death K - 1AR - Indiana QTournament: Indiana | Round: Quarters | Opponent: Indiana HF | Judge: Kelly Young, Meloche, Casey Kelly Extension - Intervention InevitablePursuit of hegemony’s locked-in—it’s only a question of effectivenessDorfman 12 – Zach Dorfman 12, assistant editor of Ethics and International Affairs, the journal of the Carnegie Council, and co-editor of the Montreal Review, "What We Talk About When We Talk About Isolationism", May 18, http://dissentmagazine.org/online.php?id=605 The rise of China notwithstanding, the United States remains the world’s sole superpower. OV( ) Ontology not 1st and links to anti-politicsJarvis 2K Acting to help others generates meaningMay 5 – Todd May 5, philo prof at Clemson, "To change the world, to celebrate life", Philosophy 26 Social Criticism, vol 31, nos 5–6, 517–531 What are we to make of these references? We can, to be sure Nietzsche 26 Ressentiment wrong – don’t generalize human experience based-on depressed dudes from the 1800’s.Foot ’1 Now on some points in his psychological observation Nietzsche undoubtedly was right; he was PermPermutation solves - both micro and macro political resistance are necessaryBest 26 Kellner ’91 (Steven, Philosophy Profesor at U of Texas - El Paso; Douglas, Philosophy Professor at UCLA, POSTMODERN THEORY: CRITICAL INTRODUCTIONS, p. 94-95) Hence, Deleuze and Guattari deconstruct the traditional oppo-sitions between objective and subjective Elective Insecurity – 1ARPeople should be allowed the CHOICE of deciding for themselves how to determine their own approach to life. Foreclosing this IS a denial of life—should be rejectedHamilton, Lecturer in Philosophy of Religion Lecturer at Kings College, London, 2000 (Christopher, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice. v3, p. 192) | 1/27/14 |
Fear of Death K - 2AC - Indiana QTournament: Indiana | Round: Quarters | Opponent: Indiana HF | Judge: Kelly Young, Meloche, Casey Kelly Liberal Model does not mean USexports violence=== ( ) Liberal Model doesn’t cause violence to be exported. Chandler ’10 ( ) Their K inverts the error. It’s too pessimistic – liberalism won’t become violent and is under-used.Youngs 11 WarSuffering=== Intervention directly kills which should be rejected —- and causes wider conflict that blocks positive peaceMiall ’99 (Hugh, Et Al., Reader in Peace and Conflict Research and Director of the Institute for Peace Studies - U Lancaster, Contemporary Conflict Resolution: The Prevention, Management, and Transformation of Deadly Conflicts p.222-3) We hope that this book has shown that the founders of the conflict resolution approach A2: China Threat Reps BadTheir K doesn’t apply—-the thesis of the advantage says the U.S. provokes conflict with China through overly aggressive foreign policy, not that China is intrinsically threatening—-this both denies the link because the context of our argument provides nuance that avoids sweeping claims about China and proves the alt reverses the error by falsely claiming that they can never contribute to violenceCallahan 5 – William A. Callahan, Professor of Politics at the University of Manchester, "How to Understand China: The Dangers and Opportunities of Being a Rising Power", Review of International Studies, 31 Although ’China threat theory’ is ascribed to the Cold War thinking of foreigners who Frontline – life is not categorically badSuffering’s only inevitable on global scale. Some folks are happy – narcissistic to deem other lives aren’t worth living.Danaher ’11 Third – Err towards life improving. Prefer Frankl’s subject position.Coontz’1 Fourth – Life is improving and their authors have pessimism bias.Cabrera 11 (Julio, Ph.D. Candidate in the Quantitative Methods in Education – University of Minnesota, "Quality of Human Life and Non-Existence (Some Criticisms of David Benatar’s Formal and Material Positions)", http://www.unesco.org.uy/ci/fileadmin/shs/redbioetica/revista_3/Cabrera.pdf) 4. Benatar’s Material Argumentation: Limits of the Empiricist Approach Five – They lose within their suffering framework.Nucleal War is AWFUL – melts skin, spreads disease, rips family apart. Even if some suffering is inevitable, degrees matter: angst not akin to unbearable pain.Eagen ’4 A2: SchlagThe ballot’s role should include State theorization. Even if Plan’s never passes, our framework advances a broader heuristic imperative. This teaches a State-inclusive civic engagement that spills to many issues.Liu ’12 A Crucible Moment likewise calls for transformations necessary for this generation. A daunting one is AND ( ) Schlag Wrong — cements nihilismBaron 3 AT: Death DriveAccepting the death drives obliterates ethics and agencyLear 2000 Jonathan Lear, Philosophy Professor at the University of Chicago, 2000 By 1920 Freud is ready to break up what he has come to see as Elective InsecurityForced danger makes elective insecurity impossibleBooth 7 – Dr. Kenneth, Professor of International Relations at the University of Aberystwyth, Theory of World Security, p. 104-105) Perhaps the most hideous image of the congruity of insecurity and the determined life in Fear of Death( ) Anxiety is not misused and promotes survivalBuss ’97 ( ) Dystopic images are an antidote to fear – they counteract fatalism and catalyze debates to alter the futureKurasawa ’4 Returning to the point I made at the beginning of this paper, the significance Coontz – Value to Life( ) Yes, value to lifeCoontz’1 DnG( ) Deleuze and Guattari’s alt failsBarbrook ’98 Cap( ) Root cause wrong – also proves Cap not as powerful as they say.Geras ’5 THE SECOND PART of the answer- to which I now turn—is a | 1/27/14 |
Feminist Rage K - 1AR - CSUF OctosTournament: CSUF | Round: Octas | Opponent: Wake DL | Judge: Cronin, Ewing, Patrick Kennedy, Weil, Najor Epistemology/Method not firstMethods and epistemology 1st is wrong – making it an a priori question is counter-productive to its own objectivesChandler ’10 In the special issue, Nicholas Kiersey and Doerthe Rosenow take direct issue with my MoralityNo, not ethics disad – consequences. That’s IsaacIssac, ’2 GenderRoot Cause=== There’s no strong methodological defense of their claim—-they sweepingly assert "root cause" without any verifiable proofJarvis 00 (Darryl, Senior Lecturer in International Relations – University of Sydney, International Relations and the Challenge of Postmodernism, p. 173-174) Crude characterizations of a hegemonic gender class thus display an anomalous capacity to ignore completely This turns the K —- more than they turn the caseGoldstein 1 – Josh Goldstein, Professor of Int’l Relations, American University, War and Gender, p. 412 First, peace activists face a dilemma in thinking about causes of war and working RitterIn theory, we could "do both" – but, in practice, "the Ballot as currency" functions to discourage out-of-round community solutions.Ritter ’13 The fiction of social change through debate abuses the win—loss structure of debate PDBGender Framework not first. Should act even if Aff may be wrong. Perm improves as we go.Cochran ’99 Topical Action’s like plan aren’t mutually exclusive with Rage.From the Website called "Feminist Rage" in ’13 End Drone Strikes Petition on WhiteHouse.gov Yo this is really important and if it gets the 25,000 signatures it needs by Feb. 11th we’ll at least get an official response from the white house so please take some time, make an account/sign in, and sign the petition A-to FraserFraser NOW wants to instruct activists to engage the State She now REJECTS anti-structural feminism. The critical bend of the Aff is COUNTERPRODUTIVE.Warnke – excerpting Nancy Fraser – ’13 What categorial framework does Fraser think can do better? What sort of theoretical perspective State ReformTotalizing claims about the state kill change and ignore that it can work for goodWilliams and Krause ’97 Many of the chapters in this volume thus retain a concern with the centrality of Civil Society( ) Sweeping reformism K is wrong. Increases oppression through isolation.Hahnel ’5 We need look no further than to the history of twentieth century libertarian socialism to | 1/9/14 |
Feminist Rage K - 1AR - Texas 1Tournament: Texas | Round: 1 | Opponent: Wake DL | Judge: Cook Gitlin( ) Curriculum’s best when it starts with fiated, state-based political actionGitlin ’5 Competitive VenueB - "the Ballot as currency" functions to discourage out-of-round community solutions.Ritter ’13 The fiction of social change through debate abuses the win—loss structure of debate Epistemology/Method not firstMethods and epistemology 1st is wrong – making it an a priori question is counter-productive to its own objectivesChandler ’10 In the special issue, Nicholas Kiersey and Doerthe Rosenow take direct issue with my A2: Positive Peace LinksIntervention directly kills which should be rejected —- and causes wider conflict that blocks positive peaceMiall ’99 (Hugh, Et Al., Reader in Peace and Conflict Research and Director of the Institute for Peace Studies - U Lancaster, Contemporary Conflict Resolution: The Prevention, Management, and Transformation of Deadly Conflicts p.222-3) We hope that this book has shown that the founders of the conflict resolution approach | 2/8/14 |
Feminist Rage K - 2AC - CSUF OctosTournament: CSUF | Round: Octas | Opponent: Wake DL | Judge: Cronin, Ewing, Patrick Kennedy, Weil, Najor 2AC Negative State Action; perm( ) Defense – solves K’s of the State.Hester ’13 "The USFG should..." should no longer be unproblematically accepted as the starting point 2AC – SturExtend our 1AC Stuhr ev. K’s of Aff’s macro-political starting point don’t apply in the War Powers context. Neg’s anti-State and micro-1st stance fail. Stuhr’s next paragraph prove that WE DON’T EXCLUDE their framework – but perm’s the best option.Stuhr ’8 These and related experiences, rooted in a love of war, are not merely Alt Can’t solve/Heuristic solves genderMicro-politics can’t solve ON THIS TOPIC. Unitary Executive shuts it down. We must learn macro-heuristics first.Engels ’9 At a moment in which a majority of Americans have found a renewed faith in Waste Accesses GenderThat disproportionately impacts womenOlson 11 – Mary Olson, Staff Member and Southeast Regional Coordinator of NIRS, Nuclear Information and Resource Service, "ATOMIC RADIATION IS MORE HARMFUL TO WOMEN", 10-18, http://www.nirs.org/radiation/radhealth/womenandradiationprfinal101811.pdf Women as a group suffer significantly more from the impact of ionizing radiation than do men. Today Nuclear Information and Resource Service published a Briefing Paper that focuses on a dramatic fifty-percent greater incidence of cancer and fifty-percent greater rate of death from cancer among women, compared to the same radiation dose level to men. To be clear: males suffer cancer and cancer death from exposure to ionizing radiation; but gender difference in the level of harm has been to date underreported. The data leading to this conclusion originally was reported in the National Academy of Sciences 2006 report, "BEIR VII" which is the seventh report in a series on the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation. The greater vulnerability of females was not the focal point of that publication, and the concern has until now escaped notice. NIRS is co-releasing the paper with activist groups in global "hot spots" including Japan (Green Action), Ukraine (Ecoclub) and Pennsylvania (Three Mile Island Alert). The paper is posted at: http://www.nirs.org/radiation/radhealth/radiationwomen.pdf NIRS is focusing new attention to this data because people living near nuclear facilities are subject to ongoing exposure to radioactivity that is routinely released to air, water and soil, even in non-accident conditions. Nonetheless, those living in the zones impacted by radiological catastrophes, including Three Mile Island, Chernobyl and Fukushima, are at even greater risk. "The data is startling; the fact that it has been un-reported, including by the National Academy itself, is shocking. The data shows a consistent fifty percent higher cancer incidence and also cancer death in women compared to men. A disproportionate impact at that level is stunning. More research is warranted and action is needed now to ensure that the vulnerable are protected," said Mary Olson, NIRS Staff Biologist, who wrote the 8 page briefing paper being published today. "Let us be clear: radiation causes disease and death in men; the same rate of exposure causes more harm to women. The Precautionary Principle dictates that we protect first, study second." As is well-known, children are the most vulnerable to radiation damage. Key mechanisms for why ionizing radiation harms children more are: first, smaller body mass results in a higher dose from a given level of radiation; second, since a growing child’s cells divide rapidly, their DNA is more exposed and vulnerable to damage from radiation. "The finding that women are also more vulnerable than men is likely due to a combination of mechanisms, and requires further study," said Olson. "Body mass may be a factor, however we also know that reproductive tissues are very radio-sensitive; women have a higher percentage of this tissue in our bodies compared to men. The NAS data is also limited, it only considers external sources of radiation. Internal exposure must also be considered in order to describe the real-life situation we are in." A-to "We never should have made it in the first place"On Waste, Captain hindsight teaches poor activismField ’12 It appears that it always boils down to the same arguments:¶ "It should 2AC – FOUR LAYER FiatTwo – We’re vertical constraint through the public sphere.Lobel ’89 These changes would supplement and ultimately transform traditional separation of power restraints. The constitutional Three – Awareness. We may spur macro-change. If we don’t, our Aff still boosts awareness. This beats framework distinctions by helping the debate-space adjust to Executive practice:Young – quoting Stewart – ’13 About six months ago, my assistant debate coaches and I decided that it would be a good idea to craft a justification paper to persuade the NDT-CEDA college policy debate community to debate the proper limits of presidential war powers and the consequences of such restrictions. At that time, there was almost daily coverage and commentary about the legality and 2AC Add-on – Gender( ) Shift to Congress is a key structural check on the patriarchal privilege. These checks curtail the global reach of unaccountable elites in the US Executive.Harrington ’92 This is where the appeal of international organization is strong: form transnational institutions that KritikWeedonWeedon flawed – essentializes and fails to understand oppressionScott-Dixon, 2/6/10 (Krista Scott Dixon ~PhD, researcher and professor of Women Studies at York University~ Commentary on "Weedon, Chris. Feminism, Theory, and the Politics of Difference." http://www.stumptuous.com/comps/weedon.html-http://www.stumptuous.com/comps/weedon.html) In this chapter, Weedon examines radical feminism in more depth. In radical feminist Reject essentialism – even if it’s an attempt at "strategic essentialism":McLaurin ’12 Philosopher Lawrence Blum, in writing on stereotypes as a general phenomenon,¶ attempts a TOP SHELFstate influence inevitable – only mobilizing focus on state reforms efforts can effectively challenge patriarchyConnnell, ’90 Because of its power to regulate and its power to create, the state is state influence is inevitable but depth of oppression matters – reform is effective and only way to solve – they exaggerate state’s internal coherenceConnnell, ’90 Appraisals Is the state patriarchal? Yes, beyond any argument, on the evidence State reform best – alt failsState based reform is key strategy for progressive gender politics supported by theory, method and empirical practice – alt makes actualization impossibleConnnell, ’90 State reform best – not fixedState reforms allow effective counter mobilizations of power – link and perm answers rely on flawed static notion of state and gender relationsConnnell, ’90 The state, then, is only part of a wider structure of gender relations state reforms challenging patriarchy can be effective – they assume a flawed fixed notion of gender and stateConnnell, ’90 6. The state is constantly changing; gender relations are historically dynamic; the state influence inevitable – legitimacy concerns make it an effective vehicle for challenging patriarchy throughout society, breaking down public private dichotomiesConnnell, ’90 3. The way the state embodies gender gives it cause and capacity to " Civil Society, State can solve( ) Working from within the system can produce change. Proves solvency and addresses K of civil society.James ’9 ( ) Things have improved – civil society not a disaster for gender.Reitzes and Friedman ’1 Against this background, the impact of the post-1994 political opportunity structure on (Note: CSOs = Civil Society Organziations) Dworkin – Transphobia TurnDworkin is transphobic – its inherent to her ideologyBettcher No Date Talia Bettcher Professor at Cal State LA, works on Trans Studies, Ph.D., UCLA, Philosophy. "Lesbian Separatism and The Transsexual Empire" http://web.calstatela.edu/faculty/tbettch/Raymond.htm Reject transphobia, they perpetuate violence and oppressionIGLHRC No Date, International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission (IGLHRC) is a leading international organization dedicated to human rights advocacy on behalf of people who experience discrimination or abuse on the basis of their actual or perceived sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, "Reject Transphobia, Respect Gender Identity: An Appeal to the United Nations, the World Health Organisation and the States of the World" | 1/9/14 |
Feminist Rage K - 2AC - Texas 1Tournament: Texas | Round: 1 | Opponent: Wake DL | Judge: Cook 2AC – Stur, on underview pageExtend our 1AC Stuhr ev. K’s of Aff’s macro-political starting point don’t apply in the War Powers context. Neg’s anti-State and micro-1st stance fail. Stuhr’s next paragraph prove that WE DON’T EXCLUDE their framework – but perm’s the best option.Stuhr ’8 These and related experiences, rooted in a love of war, are not merely Alt Can’t solve/Heuristic solves genderMicro-politics can’t solve ON THIS TOPIC. Unitary Executive shuts it down. We must learn macro-heuristics first.Engels ’9 At a moment in which a majority of Americans have found a renewed faith in 2AC Negative State Action; perm( ) Defense – solves K’s of the State.Hester ’13 "The USFG should..." should no longer be unproblematically accepted as the starting point A2: GenderRoot Cause=== There’s no strong methodological defense of their claim—-they sweepingly assert "root cause" without any verifiable proofJarvis 00 (Darryl, Senior Lecturer in International Relations – University of Sydney, International Relations and the Challenge of Postmodernism, p. 173-174) Crude characterizations of a hegemonic gender class thus display an anomalous capacity to ignore completely 2AC Add-on – Gender( ) Shift to Congress is a key structural check on the patriarchal privilege. These checks curtail the global reach of unaccountable elites in the US Executive.Harrington ’92 This is where the appeal of international organization is strong: form transnational institutions that Waste Accesses Gender( ) Plan destroys current waste. That’s our Science 2.0 evThat disproportionately impacts womenOlson 11 – Mary Olson, Staff Member and Southeast Regional Coordinator of NIRS, Nuclear Information and Resource Service, "ATOMIC RADIATION IS MORE HARMFUL TO WOMEN", 10-18, http://www.nirs.org/radiation/radhealth/womenandradiationprfinal101811.pdf Women as a group suffer significantly more from the impact of ionizing radiation AND real-life situation we are in." Perm( ) Solves gender critiques of the stateCochran ’99 HarringtonMore Congressional war powers would actually decrease masculine privilege – solves every warrant in their Dolan and Stuckey cardsHarrington ’92 This is where the appeal of international organization is strong: form transnational institutions that Killjoy AltKilljoy alt reifies violence – says women lack agency to define their own happiness. Not all joy should be killed – begs the question if we’re the bad kind.Tomsons ’12 Ahmed’s project is, in part, to examine what possibilities are created by those Ahmed too sweeping – not all joy needs killing. Will the Aff’s particular joy cause pain ?... Alt is the wrong politics.Schaefer ’13 Ahmed’s focus is very different: she is interested in thinking through politics as the TOP SHELFstate influence inevitable – only mobilizing focus on state reforms efforts can effectively challenge patriarchyConnnell, ’90 Because of its power to regulate and its power to create, the state is state influence is inevitable but depth of oppression matters – reform is effective and only way to solve – they exaggerate state’s internal coherenceConnnell, ’90 Appraisals Is the state patriarchal? Yes, beyond any argument, on the evidence Civil Society, State can solve( ) Working from within civil society can produce changeJames ’9 ( ) Things have improved – civil society not a disaster for gender.Reitzes and Friedman ’1 Against this background, the impact of the post-1994 political opportunity structure on WeedonWeedon flawed – essentializes and fails to understand oppressionScott-Dixon, 2/6/10 (Krista Scott Dixon ~PhD, researcher and professor of Women Studies at York University~ Commentary on "Weedon, Chris. Feminism, Theory, and the Politics of Difference." http://www.stumptuous.com/comps/weedon.html) In this chapter, Weedon examines radical feminism in more depth. In radical feminist Reject essentialism – even if it’s an attempt at "strategic essentialism":McLaurin ’12 Philosopher Lawrence Blum, in writing on stereotypes as a general phenomenon,¶ attempts a | 2/8/14 |
Fiscal Politics DA 2AC - GSU Round 7Tournament: GSU | Round: 7 | Opponent: Georgetown AM | Judge: Hays Watson No dealStan Collendar, Journalist, 9/16/13, This Year’s Budget Fight Isn’t About The Budget, http://ourfuture.org/20130916/this-years-budget-fight-isnt-about-the-budget There are many reasons why the budget fight that will take pace over the next PC failsReuters 9/15/13 With a possible government shutdown looming in two weeks, and the threat of a Obama not pushing- won’t even picnicOn the eve of another fiscal showdown with congressional Republicans, President Obama is outright No agenda and issues are disconnected—spillover is merely GOP red herringsBrian Beutler, Salon staff writer, 9/9/13, GOP’s massive new lie: The truth about Obama’s second term , www.salon.com/2013/09/09/syria_wont_derail_obamas_second_term_house_republicans_will/ Political reporters have a weakness for narratives, and the narrative of a weakened president Any budget deal will be short term and meaningless- doesn’t solve the economyFinancial Times 9/17/13 Mr Obama and Republicans in Congress have made repeated attempts over the past few years US econ resilientRobert Johnson 1/19/13 (CFA, director of economic analysis with Morningstar, Morningstar.com, and#34;U.S. Economy Not So Fragile After Alland#34; http://news.morningstar.com/articlenet/article.aspx?id=581616) No, the U.S. Economy Has Not Been Fragile After All¶ No impactBarnett 9 (Thomas, Senior Strategic Researcher – Naval War College, and#34;The New Rules: Security Remains Stable Amid Financial Crisisand#34;, Asset Protection Network, 8-25, http://www.aprodex.com/the-new-rules—security-remains-stable-amid-financial-crisis-398-bl.aspx) When the global financial crisis struck roughly a year ago, the blogosphere was ablaze U.S. isn’t key to the global economyML 6 (Merrill Lynch, and#34;US Downturn Won’t Derail World Economyand#34;, 9-18, http://www.ml.com/index.asp?id=7695_7696_8149_63464_70786_71164) A sharp slowdown in the U.S. economy in 2007 is unlikely to Farm bill, Syria, energy and immigration thumpWill the House pass a short-term budget this week? Maybe. Will | 10/4/13 |
Gender K - 1AR - Wake 1Tournament: Wake | Round: 1 | Opponent: Wichita State MR | Judge: White, Janna Russia RepsBoth our internal link and impact evidence are from Stephen Blank—-prefer it over ivory tower theorists—-he’s a PhD and area specialist—-uses history and makes accurate predictionsPirrong 9 Chicago PhD and Army War College Prof Stephen Blank is one of my favorite historians ConseqIssac, ’2 Politics, in large part, involves contests over the distribution and use of power Action not always fail – pessimism bias and alts more dangerous.Tallis ’97 If we deny or rubbish the progress that mankind has already made, and at Methods Not First====( ) Methods-based focus risks getting trapped and causing anti-politics==== Fearon 26Wendt 2K It should be stressed that in advocating a pragmatic view we are not endorsing method Pre-Fiat Wrong( ) We’ll indict "pre-fiat" args – they mask that macro-politics shapes the local more than vice-versa.Ebert ’5 The emergence of micropolitics marks the impact of the globalization of capitalist production and the PermCritiques of gender relations that do not pose concrete alternatives are destined to fail. If researchers cannot add gender to an analysis, then they must necessarily use a Sweeping reformism K is wrong. Increases oppression through isolation.Hahnel ’5 We need look no further than to the history of twentieth century libertarian socialism to | 11/16/13 |
Gender K - 2AC - Wake 1Tournament: Wake | Round: 1 | Opponent: Wichita State MR | Judge: White, Janna K Defenses – Migration –Fear of migration’s hardwired—-desecuritization failsSwarts 13 – Jonathan Swarts, Associate Professor of Political Science at Purdue University North Central, 26 Neovi M. Karakatsanis, Professor of Political Science at Indiana University South Bend, "Challenges to Desecuritizing Migration in Greece", Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 15(1), T26F Online The Difficulty of Desecuritization Russia ThreatIt’s an exception to the K —- no "root cause"Kydd 97 – Professor of Political Science of California, Riverside, Security Studies, Autumn 1997 p. 154 As for the Second World War, few structural realists will make a sustained case Gender KGender isn’t a "root case" —- case is the pre-requisiteGoldstein 1 – Joshua S. Goldstein, professor emeritus of international relations at American University, adjunct professor in the Watson Institute for International Studies at Brown University, 2001, War and Gender: How Gender Shapes the War System and Vice Versa, p. 412 First, peace activists face a dilemma in thinking about causes of war and working ====There’s no truth value to the K —- IR is not inherently gendered, their ev indicts a fiction that the Neg constructs ==== Whilst Tickner’s feminism presents an interesting revisioning of international relations, it ultimately suffers from They artificially divide and group IR into "feminine" and "masculine" —- both categories are false and over-simplifyMurray 97 – Alastair J. H. Murray, Professor of Politics @ U of Wales, 1997 (Reconstructing Realism: Between Power Politics and Cosmopolitan Ethics) p. 193 Tickner, of course, cannot accept any of this: essential to her entire No ImpactNo impact to threat construction or apocalyptic rhetoric—-case turns the KKaufman 9 – Kaufman, Prof Poli Sci and IR – U Delaware, ’9 (Stuart J, "Narratives and Symbols in Violent Mobilization: The Palestinian-Israeli Case," Security Studies 18:3, 400 – 434) Even when hostile narratives, group fears, and opportunity are strongly present, war Reps don’t shape security policyBalzacq 5 (Thierry, Professor of Political Science and International Relations at Namur University, "The Three Faces of Securitization: Political Agency, Audience and Context" European Journal of International Relations, London: Jun 2005, Volume 11, Issue 2) However, despite important insights, this position remains highly disputable. The reason behind Gendered Policymaking( ) Plan makes policymaking less masculineHarrington ’92 This is where the appeal of international organization is strong: form transnational institutions that Alt Doesn’t SolveAlternative fails —- no mechanism to translate theory into practiceJones 99 (Richard Wyn, Lecturer in the Department of International Politics – University of Wales, Security, Strategy, and Critical Theory, CIAO, http://www.ciaonet.org/book/wynjones/wynjones06.html) Because emancipatory political practice is central to the claims of critical theory, one might SpaceBush Doctrine is hampering US-India relations – revoking it is key to space coopSidhu 10 While the political system is a limiting factor in improving relations, this is not Relations solve asteroid deflection – a strike is likely and bad.Bagla 13 Saving humanity from a mega-asteroid strike could be the next big effort in Right Fill-InRight fills in —- blocks transformationKnudsen 1 – Olav. F. Knudsen, Prof @ Södertörn Univ College, ’1 ~Security Dialogue 32.3, "Post-Copenhagen Security Studies: Desecuritizing Securitization," p. 366~ A final danger in focusing on the state is that of building the illusion that | 11/16/13 |
Heg Bad 1AR - GSU Round 5Tournament: GSU | Round: 5 | Opponent: Northwestern MV | Judge: Malsin Pursuit of hegemony’s locked-in—it’s only a question of effectivenessDorfman 12 – Zach Dorfman 12, assistant editor of Ethics and International Affairs, the journal of the Carnegie Council, and co-editor of the Montreal Review, and#34;What We Talk About When We Talk About Isolationismand#34;, May 18, http://dissentmagazine.org/online.php?id=605-http://dissentmagazine.org/online.php?id=605 The rise of China notwithstanding, the United States remains the world’s sole superpower. Weak hegemony is even worse – plan makes it successfulRobert Kagan 11 is a contributing editor to The Weekly Standard and a senior fellow in foreign policy at the Brookings Institution. and#34;The Price of Powerand#34; Jan 24 Vol 16 No18 www.weeklystandard.com/articles/price-power_533696.html?page=3 2000 years of empirical data proves heg solves conflictWohlforth 8 – William Wohlforth, Daniel Webster Professor of Government, Dartmouth. BA in IR, MA in IR and MPhil and PhD in pol sci, Yale, Unipolarity, Status Competition, and Great Power War, October 2008, World Politics Vol. 61, Iss. 1; pg. 28, 31 pgs, Proquest Despite increasingly compelling findings concerning the importance of status seeking in human behavior, research | 10/4/13 |
Heg Bad 2AC - GSU Round 5Tournament: GSU | Round: 5 | Opponent: Northwestern MV | Judge: Malsin Plan is key to perception of benign hegemon – solves balancing and resentment – makes heg effective and stabilizes cooperation – that’s Ikenberry. Also reverses perception of unilateralism that boosts soft power – that’s SchifferIntervention’s inevitable —- plan solves the bad onesMead 9 (Walter Russell, Senior Fellow for U.S. Foreign Policy – Council on Foreign Relations, American Interest, http://www.the-american-interest.com/ai2/article.cfm?Id=33426MId=16) Barry Posen puts his fingers on some of the classic and enduring tensions in American Independent of heg, effective power projection prevents conflicts from escalating – that’s Kagan Plan makes US heg legitimate – makes heg sustainable, effective, and prevents balancingKnowles 9 – Robert Knowles, Acting Assistant Professor at the New York University School of Law, and#34;American Hegemony and the Foreign Affairs Constitutionand#34;, Arizona State Law Journal, Spring, 41 Ariz. St. L.J. 87, Lexis American unipolarity is unprecedented. n326 First, the United States is geographically isolated from Only the plan solves weak heg which is worse —- invites aggression, causes miscalc, and doesn’t deterFeaver 3 (Peter D., Professor of Political Science – Duke University, Armed Services: Agency, Oversight, and Civil-Military Relations, p. 213) The civil-military problematique is a simple paradox: The very institution created to Independently plan solves alliances which solves a laundry list of existential threats – that’s Ikenberry Collapse causes re-intervention and nuclear war —- turns their impactsHirsch 3 (Michael, Senior Editor – Washington Bureau, At War With Ourselves, p. 10-11) Yes, it is possible. But first we must cross a psychological threshold ourselves Multiple independent fields support our claimWohlforth 9 – William Wohlforth, Professor of Government at Dartmouth College, and#34;Unipolarity, Status Competition, and Great Power Warand#34;, Project Muse Mainstream theories generally posit that states come to blows over an international status quo only | 10/4/13 |
Heidegger K - 1AR - UK RR 8Tournament: UK RR | Round: 8 | Opponent: Oklahoma LM | Judge: Hall, Sherry Root cause/Turns Case SectionAnd, root cause args wrong – their claim’s offense for us.Swanson ’5 Ontology not 1st( ) Ontology not 1st and links to anti-politicsJarvis 2K ConseqIssac, ’2 FW( ) Our framework avoids dogma and solves exceptionalismEnglish ’7 | 10/4/13 |
Heidegger K - 2AC - UK RR 8Tournament: UK RR | Round: 8 | Opponent: Oklahoma LM | Judge: Hall, Sherry A2: Asteroid RepsAsteroid Reps good. History proves they mobilize civil, not imperial, responsesKirby ’3 Indeed, many advisors perceive fictional film as a way to promote their science in Space – AT: Heidegger/Management KPlan’s not management and there’s no impactAshworth 10 – Stephen Ashworth, Long-Standing Fellow of the British Interplanetary Society and Voltaire Foundation, Part of Oxford University, "Towards the Sociology of the Universe, Part 1 – 1. A Review of Dickens and Ormrod, Cosmic Society", 12-18, http://www.astronist.demon.co.uk/space-age/essays/Sociology1.html Another example of the tendentious style of reasoning employed by Dickens and Ormrod is found AT: Famine Reps KHunger depictions good – Global food surplus exists. If nothing else, depictions cause meaningful short-term redistribution.Ó Gráda ’9 By FAO definitions, the world still contains about eight hundred million malnourished people. Hunger depictions DON’T just cause guilt – can produce meaningful change.Robb ’12 A2: Nuclear RepsExamining nuclear policies and making informed policy choices fights nuclear nihilism According to nuclear educators, a sense of powerlessness among children compounded the problem. The causality of their impact is awfulGhughunishvili 10 As provided by the Copenhagen School securitization theory is comprised by speech act, acceptance A2: Miscalc RepsTrachtenberg is an Aff arg – we don’t misdirect energy and our internal link was about DECREASING the Groupthink that allows wars to gradually escalate. Here’s more from his article:Marc Trachtenberg is professor in the department of history at the University of Pennsylvania. The "Accidental War" Question – February 14, 2000 – http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/polisci/faculty/trachtenberg/cv/inadv28129.pdf War through "Miscalculation" Wars can come about even though neither side sets out The risk is real and claims to the contrary are part of an effort to gloss-over the risks of an aggressive US posture.DR. GERARD TOAL (he goes by the name Gearóid Ó Tuathail as well – for the purpose of retrieving this citation) is a Professor of Government and International Affairs at Virginia Tech and is also Associate Editor, Geopolitics, a Taylor and Francis journal – Annals of the Association of American Geographers, Vol. 90, No. 1 (Mar., 2000), pp. 166-178 – Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1515387 The reciprocal relationship between geopo- litical practices and the mass media raises many critical Managerialism K – 2ACToo late: intervention has irreparably altered the world. Abandoning management risks extinction.Levy 99 (Neil, Ph.D. in Comparative Literature and Critical Theory – Monash University, and Currently Tutor, Centre for Critical Theory – Monash University, Discourses of the Environment edited by Eric Darier, p. 214-215) If our current situation can really be accurately characterized as the extension of bio- No impact: management is reflexive and beneficialHudson 2 (Mark, Ph.D. Sociology – University of Oregon, BA Economics – University of Manitoba, and MA Environmental Studies – York University, Environments, December) Similarly, the management of the environment, or, more appropriately, the regulation No "Being" DA – totalizing and causes their impactCaputo ’93 That would mean you cannot have an obligation to Being or the Spirit or the ( ) Their "Being" offense is violent – too abstract, ignores that degree matters, makes action impossible.Rorty, ’99 ( ) Heidegger’s K of technology is too sweepingAdria ’8 A totalizing view of technology is evident in the work of Virilio, as it ( ) Psycho-Analysis not the Root Cause – that over-explainsMuro-Ruiz 2 Violence is, most of the time, a wilful choice, especially if it Legal restraints on use of force are the best check against militarism —- rejecting all intervention goes too far, won’t be accepted, and risks real security threatsFalk 1 – Richard Falk, Professor Emeritus of International Law at Princeton University, "Defining a Just War", The Nation, 10-11, http://www.thenation.com/article/defining-just-war~~23 I. ANTIWAR/PACIFIST APPROACH The pacifist position opposing even limited military action overlooks Our Aff is most ethical option —- reigning in the worst interventions solves their offense, but preserves the ethical good of avoiding conflictReus 4 – Christian Reus-Smit, Professor of International Relations at Australian National University, American Power and World Order, p. 109-115 The final ethical position — the polar opposite of the first — holds that the Groupthink BadAff’s reversal of groupthink cuts down militarismPolley 11 Cultures of War is one of those books that, according to reviewers on amazon | 10/4/13 |
Hostilities 1AC - CSUF 6Tournament: CSUF | Round: 6 | Opponent: Liberty CE | Judge: Bankey PlanThe United States Federal Government should not allow the introduction of United States Armed Forces into warfare without prior Congressional authorization.Rest is Old: See round report | 1/8/14 |
Hostilities 1AC - CSUF DubsTournament: CSUF | Round: Doubles | Opponent: Kentucky GR | Judge: JP, Hardy, Lucas-Bolin Contention 1—-IranNegotiations aren’t final—-next 6 months are key to stop breakout and regional instabilityShultz 13 – Henry A. Kissinger and George P. Shultz, Both Former United States Secretaries of State, "What a Final Iran Deal Must Do", Wall Street Journal, 12-2, http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304747004579228110944819396 The interim nuclear deal with Iran has been described as the first step toward the Iran’s motive is defensive—-U.S. threats speed up prolif and empower hardliners who won’t compromisePillar 13 – Dr. Paul R. Pillar, Professor and Senior Fellow at the Center for Security Studies at Georgetown University and Nonresident Senior Fellow in Foreign Policy at the Brookings Institution, Ph.D. in Politics from Princeton University, MA in Politics from Oxford University, "Threats of Force Don’t Always Help", The National Interest, 9-15, http://nationalinterest.org/blog/paul-pillar/threats-force-dont-always-help-9072 The danger of the commonly accepted conclusion comes from promoting a simple belief that " Threats have no upside—-there’s already sufficient leverage to push a dealThielmann 13 – Greg Thielmann, Senior Fellow of the Arms Control Association and Former Office Director for Strategic, Proliferation, and Military Affairs In the State Department’s Bureau of Intelligence and Research, "Senators’ Iran Letter Complicates Solution", 8-6, http://nationalinterest.org/commentary/senators-iran-letter-complicates-solution-8836?page=1 With tough economic sanctions now in place, and a broad political consensus holding among Even with a deal, clandestine prolif’s inevitable until underlying motives are resolvedKemp 13 – R. Scott Kemp, Assistant Professor of Nuclear Science and Engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, "Iran’s Nuclear Program: The Case for Engagement", Assessment of the Nuclear Programs of Iran and North Korea, Ed. Kang, p. 83-84 Nuclear war’s likely through miscalc, accidents, or theft—-their defense is old and disprovenKahl 12 – Colin, Associate Professor at Georgetown University’s Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service, Former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for the Middle East and Senior Fellow at the Center for a New American Security, "Iran and the Bomb", Foreign Affairs, September / October, Ebsco Kenneth Waltz is probably right that a nuclear-armed Iran could be deterred from Deterrence will failEdelman 11 – Distinguished Fellow at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments (Eric S, "The Dangers of a Nuclear Iran," Foreign Affairs, January/February) Were Saudi Arabia to acquire nuclear weapons, the Middle East would count three nuclear ExtinctionPrimakov 9 – September, Yevgeny, President of the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of the Russian Federation; Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences; member of the Editorial Board of Russia in Global Affairs. This article is based on the scientific report for which the author was awarded the Lomonosov Gold Medal of the Russian Academy of Sciences in 2008, "The Middle East Problem in the Context of International Relations" The Middle East conflict is unparalleled in terms of its potential for spreading globally. Plan tempers coercive diplomacy—-formal legislative checks stop threats and build international confidenceWaxman 13 – Matthew Waxman, Law Professor at Columbia Law School, "The Constitutional Power To Threaten War", Yale Law Journal, 10-1, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2316777 C. Legal Reform and Strategies of Threatened Force Among legal scholars of war powers Congressional restrictions send a key signalRitter 7 – Scott Ritter, Former Marine Intelligence Officer and Chief Weapons Inspector for the United Nations in Iraq from 1991 to 1998, "Stop The Iran War Before It Starts", The Nation, 12-27, http://www.countercurrents.org/iran-ritter270107.htm If hearings show no case for war with Iran, then Congress must act to Formalizing restraint as a security guarantee is the key incentive to stop prolifSagan 6 – Scott D. Sagan, Professor of Political Science at Stanford University and Senior Fellow at the Center for International Security and Cooperation and the Freeman Spogli Institute, "How to Make Tehran Blink", Newsweek, 8-28, http://www.partnershipforglobalsecurity-archive.org/Projects20and20Publications/News/Nuclear20News/2006/830200660402PM.html Given Tehran’s defiant response to the European and American effort to constrain its nuclear program Contention 2—-SOPU.S. war powers are modeled internationally —- the precedent of unilateral executive authority ruins global human rights norms and encourages preemptive conflict in multiple hotspotsSloane 8 – Sloane, Associate Professor of Law, Boston University School of Law, 2008 (Robert, Boston University Law Review, April, 88 B.U.L. Rev. 341, Lexis) There is a great deal more constitutional history that arguably bears on the scope of Collapse of human rights norms causes global WMD conflictBurke-White 4 – William W., Lecturer in Public and International Affairs and Senior Special Assistant to the Dean at the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University and Ph.D. at Cambridge, "Human Rights and National Security: The Strategic Correlation", The Harvard Human Rights Journal, Spring, 17 Harv. Hum. Rts. J. 249, Lexis This Article presents a strategic—as opposed to ideological or normative—argument that Conflict’s likely in Taiwan, Georgia, and India/Pakistan —- U.S. signal’s keyRehman 12 – Fehzan Rehman, International Relations at the University of Westminster, "Analyzing America’s National Security Strategy", e-International Relations, 9-13, http://www.e-ir.info/2012/09/13/analyzing-americas-national-security-strategy/ Another implication on sovereignty, due to the NSS, was, yet again, Preemption ruins U.S. leverage to deescalate regional crises —- goes nuclearSteinberg 2 – James B. Steinberg, Vice President and Director of Foreign Policy at the Brookings Institution, Michael E. O’Hanlon and Susan E. Rice, "The New National Security Strategy and Preemption", Brookings Policy Brief Series, December, http://www.brookings.edu/research/papers/2002/12/terrorism-ohanlon The Dangers of Legitimating Preemption A final concern relates to the impact of the precedent Requiring formal declaration of war restores Congressional war powers and balances SOP by checking the ExecutiveWeinberger 9 – Seth Weinberger, Assistant Professor in the Department of Politics and Government at the University of Puget Sound, M.A. and Ph.D. in Political Science from Duke University, "Balancing War Powers in an Age of Terror", The Good Society, 18(2), http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/good_society/v018/18.2.weinberger.html The key to developing a constitutionally, legally, and practically sound balanced theory of Congress must be the first moverHansen 9 – Hansen and Friedman, professors of law at the New England School of Law, 2009 (Victor and Lawrence, The Case for Congress: Separation of Powers and the War on Terror, p.130) The problem, of course, is that much of this congressional involvement has come Only formal, structural checks restrain preemptionDamrosch 97 – Lori Fisler Damrosch, Professor of Law at the Columbia University School of Law, "Use of Force and Constitutionalism", Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 36 Colum. J. Transnat’l L. 449, Lexis Structural-institutional explanations, on the other hand, point to features of liberal Contention 3—-ChinaRestoring war power stops Congressional meddling in diplomacy—-it’s growing over the East China SeaCarpenter 13 – Ted Galen Carpenter, Senior Fellow at the Cato Institute and Contributing Editor to The National Interest, "Congress’ Worst-of-Both-Worlds Approach to Foreign Policy", National Interest, 11-13, http://nationalinterest.org/commentary/congress-worst-both-worlds-approach-foreign-policy-9394 The role of Congress in the conduct of foreign policy has become nearly the opposite Congressional interference in day-to-day foreign policy torpedoes US/China cooperation—-risks military escalation over the SenkakusCarpenter 13 – Ted Galen Carpenter, Senior Fellow at the Cato Institute and Contributing Editor to The National Interest, "Dangerous Congressional Meddling in the South China Sea", China US Focus, 8-12, http://www.chinausfocus.com/foreign-policy/dangerous-congressional-meddling-in-the-south-china-sea/ There is a strong argument for a vigorous congressional role in the conduct of U Interjection in the conflict chain-gangs the U.S. into conflict—-nuclear warEland 12-10 – Ivan Eland, Senior Fellow and Director of the Center on Peace 26 Liberty, The Independent Institute, "Stay Out of Petty Island Disputes in East Asia", Huffington Post, 2013, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ivan-eland/stay-out-of-petty-island-_b_4414811.html One of the most dangerous international disputes that the United States could get dragged into Escalation’s likelyGertz 13 – Bill Gertz, Media Fellow at the Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace at Stanford University and National Security Columnist for the Washington Times, "Inside the Ring: Danger of China Conflict Grows", Washington Times, 11-13, http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/nov/13/inside-the-ring-danger-of-china-conflict-grows/?page=all As China steps up sovereignty claims over disputed waters in Asia, U.S Nothing checksEmmot 8 – Bill Emmott, Editor of the Economist, "Power Rises in the East", The Australian, http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/arts/power-rises-in-the-east/story-e6frg8px-1111116460128) As well as knitting them, however, this drama is also grinding together Asian US/China relations solve multiple scenarios for extinctionWenzhong 4 – Wenzhong, PRC Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 2-7-4 (Zhou, "Vigorously Pushing Forward the Constructive and Cooperative Relationship Between China and the United States," http://china-japan21.org/eng/zxxx/t64286.htm-http://china-japan21.org/eng/zxxx/t64286.htm) China’s development needs a peaceful international environment, particularly in its periphery. We will Plan stops escalation over the East and South China SeasKelly 13 – Robert E. Kelly, Professor of International Relations at Pusan National University, Interview with James Pach, 10/10, "The Diplomat Interviews", The Diplomat, http://thediplomat.com/author-spotlight/2013/10/10/the-diplomat-interviews-robert-e-kelly-2/) Your most recent feature for us argued that the assertiveness of the British Parliament and The United States Federal Government should require Congressional authorization through a policy trial prior to the introduction of United States Armed Forces into armed conflict, unless to repel attacks.Ex ante policy trials avoid circumventionBuchanan 8 – Bruce Buchanan, Professor of Government at the University of Texas at Austin, "Presidential Accountability for Wars of Choice", Issues in Governance Studies, Number 22, December, http://www.brookings.edu/~~/media/research/files/papers/2008/12/3020war20buchanan/1230_war_buchanan.pdf Implications These cases of Korea, Vietnam and Iraq display regrettable patterns of ill- Obama will complyBarron 8 – David J. Barron, Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and Martin S. Lederman, Visiting Professor of Law at the Georgetown University Law Center, "The Commander in Chief at the Lowest Ebb — A Constitutional History", Harvard Law Review, February, 121 Harv. L. Rev. 941, Lexis In addition to offering important guidance concerning the congressional role, our historical review also | 1/8/14 |
Hostilities 1AC - CSUF OctosTournament: CSUF | Round: Octas | Opponent: Wake DL | Judge: Cronin, Ewing, Patrick Kennedy, Weil, Najor 1ACContention 1—- Presidential AggressionU.S. is pushing Responsibility to Protect—-this provokes Russia and China and risks global great power conflictTrombly 11 – Dan Trombly, Ph.D Candidate in International Relations at George Washington University, "The Upending of Sovereignty", 8-27, http://slouchingcolumbia.wordpress.com/2011/08/27/the-upending-of-sovereignty/ The other, truly potent danger of this new set of norms is that it Plan stops U.S. implementation of R2P —- Presidents support it, but Congress blocksHanania 12 – Richard Hanania, JD Candidate at the University of Chicago Law School and Writer at The Atlantic, "Humanitarian Intervention and the War Powers Debate", The Journal Jurisprudence, (2012) J. JURIS 47, http://www.jurisprudence.com.au/juris13/Hanania.pdf What we see is a public that is generally indifferent to foreign affairs, but Executive war powers cause intervention—-debating the plan checks abuses of authoritySloane ’8 There is a great deal more constitutional history that arguably bears on the scope of Only structural changes limit use of force—-legislative control’s keyBacevich 7 Requiring declaration’s is the most likely and effective mechanism for change—-advocacy of institutional solutions makes them likelyGrynaviski ’13 Conclusion The burden of the argument, thus far, has been to show that Contention 2—-JapanFormalizing Congressional war power creates a clear model that shapes Japanese constitutionalismMartin 11 – Craig Martin Visiting Assistant Professor at the University of Baltimore School of Law Winter 2011 "Taking War Seriously: A Model for Constitutional Constraints on the Use of Force in Compliance with International Law" 76 Brooklyn L. Rev. 611 Lexis There are several reasons for choosing to develop the mechanism in this fashion, but Japan models Congressional war powers—-plan stops Article 9 revisionShibata 3 – Byron Shibata Assistant Professor, Law Faculty, Ritsumeikan University 2003 "The Spirit of Civilian Control Over the Military: Lessons from the United States Constitution" Ritsumeikan Law Review http://www.ritsumei.ac. jp/acd cg/law/lex/rlr19/shibata.pdf I?Introduction Since the Persian Gulf War in 1991, the world community, It’s comingAuslin 12-26 – Michael Auslin 12/26/13 resident scholar and the director of Japan Studies at the American Enterprise Institute "Japan Officially Enters Cold War with China and Korea" National Review Online http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/367098/japan-officially-enters-cold-war-china-and-korea-michael-auslin The real question is not what China and South Korea will do in response to That undermines US/Japan relationsMatsumura 6 – Masahiro Matsumura, Visiting Fellow at the Brooking Institution, "Prudence and Realism in Japan’s Nuclear Options", Brookings Institution Report, November 10, http://www.brookings.edu/research/opinions/2006/11/10japan-matsumura The world is watching Japan’s reaction to North Korea’s nuclear test for signs that it US/Japan relations are key to fusion energy developmentMilora 2K – Stanley L. Milora (Oak Ridge National Laboratory, CCFE, 00 (Coordinating Committee on Fusion Energy, June 22, "A Joint Report on the Progress of U.S.-Japan Fusion Cooperation Program", http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:UtCr5jgcXRMJ:peaches. ph.utexas.edu/ifs/jift/JIFT_JOINT_RPT.pdf+andcd=1andhl=enandct=clnkandgl=us) INTRODUCTION One of the initiatives developed at the 1978 Carter-Fukuda Summit was bilateral Fusion eats fission waste. Hybrid devices solve fast, even if pure fusion’s difficultKotschenreuther ’9 A new invention could drastically decrease the need for any additional or expanded geological repositories Waste killsRoss ’11 "What does the Neg do about current waste" ?Devolving framework to a room in Fullerton doesn’t teach responsible answers to that question. In the waste context, abstraction teaches abdication.Cairns ’6 The First Minister is showing leadership in tackling the issue and not running away from Fusion’s a unique challenge to technocratic control of energyRazani 12 (Rezwan, Executive Director – Focus Fusion Society, "Batman Fusion Redemption", Fusion Energy League, 7-26, http://www.fusionenergyleague.org/index.php/blog/article/batman_fusion_redemption) Fusion doesn’t melt down. TDKR confuses fission and fusion. Fission (FIZZ) Tech is fluid and variable —- prefer particular context before totalizing pessimismAdria 8 (Marco Adria – Director of the Graduate Program in Communications and Technology University of Alberta – The Journal of Community Informatics – Vol 4, No 1 (2008) – http://www.ci-journal.net/index.php/ciej/article/view/426/392) A totalizing view of technology is evident in the work of Virilio, as it PlanThe United States Congress should remove the President’s unitary authority to conduct military operations.Contention 3—-HeuristicsPlan is Negative State Action. We’re not Pro-state. We are Anti-Anti State.Barbrook ’97 I thought that this position is clear from my remarks about the ultra-left We’re also a heuristic. We teach the State, but to dismantle bad practicesEnglish ’7 It is our position, however, that rather than acting as a cultural technology Extreme frameworks say we "do nothing". But non-concrete activism is WORSE THAN NOTHING. No Framework QUESTION can veer this round from the NEXUS QUESTION OF CONCRETE ALTS. Without those, we’re less effective activists. This assumes waste.Bryant ’12 I must be in a mood today– half irritated, half amused –because Institutional advocacy checks apathy. It’s a better heuristic than "ballot as solidarity".Coverstone ’5 Debates over the relative efficacy of political strategies for pro-social change must confront Particularity Thesis – We can advance accurate and contingent "small-T" truth claims without linking to broader theorization.Reinalda ’4 Middle-range theories The discussion between rationalists and constructivists is not limited to substantive Our heuristic won’t solely teach war powers – but broader lessons. The impact’s large.Liu ’12 A Crucible Moment likewise calls for transformations necessary for this generation. A daunting one is to eliminate persistent inequalities, especially those in the United States determined by income and race, in order to secure the country’s economic and civic future. But the academy must also be a vehicle for tackling other pressing issues—growing global economic inequalities, climate change and environmental degradation, lack of access to quality health care, economic volatility, and more. To do that requires expanding students’ capacities to be civic problem-solvers using all their powers of intellect and inventiveness. Sixty-five years after the Truman Commission, the nation faces a different national and global dynamic than in the aftermath of World War II. A Crucible Moment casts its National Call to Action in the context of five trends that shape this historic juncture. Increase in Democratic nations: In 1950, just over 25 percent of countries in the world could be characterized as electoral democracies (Diamond 2011). In 2010, 59 percent of countries could be characterized in this way (Puddington 2011). Moreover, "in 1975 the number of countries that were ’not free’ exceeded those that were ’free’ by 50 percent, ~but~ by 2007 twice as many countries were ’free’ as were ’not free’ (Goldstone 2010, 1). According to an official statement released by the Arab Network for the Study of Democracy, the Arab Spring of 2011 brought people in seven countries to the streets united by three notions: freedom, dignity, and justice (Lee 2011). These shifts offer significant opportunities for revitalizing all democracies, both old and new, as modern democracies learn collectively how to recalibrate democratic processes to meet the new demands of a globalized age. Intensified Global Competition: After World War II, the United States competed only with the Soviet Union for global domination as other nations were busy either putting their devastated economies back in order or developing them. Today, powerful new economies exist on every continent. The European Union is challenging US economic domination, and there is a decided tilt toward the Asian markets of China, India, and Japan. In this globalized world, the budgets of many multinational companies are larger than those of many countries, and they are not bound in their practices by any one nation. Dangerous Economic Inequalities: While the United States had been moving toward a diamond-shaped economy with a larger middle class, recent years have seen an increased gulf between rich and poor across US households. Economist Edward N. Wolff notes, for example, that between 2007 and mid 2009 there was "a fairly steep rise in wealth inequality ~where~ the share of the top 1 percent advanced from 34.6 to 37.1 percent, that of the top 5 percent from 61.8 to 65 percent, and that of the top quintile from 85 to 87.7 percent, while that of second quintile fell from 10.9 to 10 percent, that of the middle quintile from 4 to 3.1 percent, and that of the bottom two quintiles from 0.2 to -0.8 percent" (Wolff 2010, 33). In sum, as of 2009, nearly 90 percent of wealth was concentrated among the top 20 percent of US households, while just over 10 percent of wealth was spread across the remaining 80 percent. One result of this hyper-consolidation of wealth is that for the first time in US history, the younger generation is not on a trajectory to achieve their parents’ economic level. These same economic inequalities are even more dramatic in a global context. According to former UN Humanitarian Relief Coordinator Jan Egeland. "The richest individuals are richer than several of the poorest nations combined—a few billionaires are richer than the poorest two billion people" ( http://ucatlas. ucsc.edu/income.php). Economist Branko Milanovic (2000) has found that the ratio of the average income of the top 5 percent of the world’s population to the bottom 5 percent increased from 78 to 1 in 1988 to 114 to 1 in 1993. In the case of sub-Saharan Africa, a whole region has been left behind: it will account for almost one-third of world poverty in 2015, up from one-fifth in 1990 (United Nations Development Programme 2007). Demographic Diversity: The United States is "the most religiously diverse nation on earth" (Eck 2002, 4), and is more racially diverse than ever. By 2045 communities of color will constitute at least 50 percent nationwide (Roberts 2008), as is already the case in some states. Immigrants now make up 12.5 percent of the US population (Gryn and Larsen 2010). Intensified immigration and refugee populations swirling around the entire globe have resulted in similarly dramatic demographic shifts on almost every continent. Having the capacity to draw on core democratic processes to negotiate the increased diversity will secure a stable future. technological Advances: In 1945, televisions were a rarity and many sections of the country were just getting telephone lines and electricity. The impact of computers and information technology today is reminiscent of the transformation wrought by the Industrial Age: all facets of everyday livingare affected, from communication to health care, from industry to energy, and from educational pedagogies to democratic practices. The Internet— particularly the development of social media to organize groups of people around commonly shared values—influences democratic engagement and activism, as dramatically illustrated by the 2011 Arab Spring and the 2008 US presidential election. While the historical dynamics that shaped the Truman Commission’s findings may differ from today’s political and social environment, a number of stubborn problems that existed then continue to erode the foundation of our democracy. The most pressing of these are unequal access to college and economic lethargy. Although access has increased dramatically, unequal access continues to plague democracy’s ability to thrive. Students are underprepared for college because of what writer and educator Jonathan Kozol (1991) refers to as "the savage inequalities" of the nation’s K–12 system. The poorer the young person, the less likely he or she will go to college. Yet SAT scores, which directly correlate with income, continue to determine many students’ qualifications to attend college. Failure to graduate from high school shuts off college as an option for nearly 30 percent of our nation’s young people; researchers James Heckman and Paul LaFontaine (2007) note that high school graduation rates have leveled or declined over four decades, and the "majority/minority graduation rate differentials are substantial and have not converged over the past 35 years." In a new foreword to The Drama of Diversity and Democracy: Higher Education and American Commitments, Ramón A. Gutiérrez illustrates Latinos’ attrition along the educational pipeline in the United States. While they are the fastest growing racial minority, surpassing the percentage of African Americans, education is not providing a democratic pathway to economic independence or social mobility. Drawing on research by Armida Ornelas and Daniel Solórzano, Gutiérrez explains that "of every one hundred Latinos who enroll in elementary school, fifty-three will drop out," and of the forty-seven who graduate from high school, "only twenty-six will pursue some form of postsecondary education" and "only eight will graduate with baccalaureate degrees" (Gutiérrez 2011, xvi). In the face of troubling discrepancies among racial and socioeconomic groups, there is some good news in the longer term regarding the nation’s increasing college graduation rates. In 1940, only 24 percent of the population 25 years and older had completed high school, and just under 5 percent held a bachelor’s degree (Bauman and Graf 2003). Seventy years later, those numbers have progressed dramatically. "Of the 3.2 million youth age 16 to 24 who graduated from high school between January and October 2010, about 2.2 million (68.1 percent) were enrolled in college in October 2010" (Bureau of Labor Statistics 2011). Overall college graduation rates have also improved: the Digest of Education Statistics 2010, for example, reports that for those seeking the bachelor’s degree, the rate of graduation within four years has reached 36.4 percent. Within six years, it jumps to 57.2 percent. For those seeking an associate’s degree, the graduation rate within six years is 27.5 percent (Snyder and Dillow 2011). According to the 2011 Education at a Glance report completed by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), the labor force in the United States is among the world’s top five most highly educated. However, OECD’s report explains, "The US is the only country where attainment levels among those just entering the labor market (25–34 year-olds) do not exceed those about to leave the labor market (55–64 yearolds)." As a result, "among 25–34 year-olds, the US ranks 15th among 34 OECD countries in tertiary attainment" (OECD 2011, 2). In other words, the educational attainment level in the United States has remained relatively flat while other countries have rapidly increased and surpassed us. An attainment rate that qualified the United States to be near the top of the world several decades ago is not a guarantee of retaining world leadership educationally. Neither graduation rates nor attainment rates that were sufficient in the past are satisfactory today, when two-thirds of future jobs will require some type of postsecondary credential. There is a strong link between educational level and preparedness for a newly demanding workplace, just as there is a strong link between educational level and other civic indicators, including voting. A high-quality education, workforce preparation, and civic engagement are inextricably linked. A college education—who has access to it, and who completes the degree—affects personal ambitions, the economy, and civic participation. After World War II, the United States invested in higher education as a vehicle to jump-start economic expansion. The community college sector in particular was dramatically expanded to provide people with new access to college and new technical skills. In today’s economy, higher education is once again viewed as a way graduates can achieve greater economic mobility and our lethargic economy can be stimulated. In 1947, with the world in shambles, new structures, alliances, and programs were created in an attempt to avert future catastrophic wars, to reconstruct multiple economies, and to establish common principles of justice and equality. As the Truman Commission demonstrates, political and educational leaders agreed that higher education was needed to educate students for international understanding and cooperation to secure a sustainable future. Although today’s world is more globally integrated financially, culturally, and demographically, it is also fraught with civil and regional wars, clashing values, and environmental challenges wrought by rapacious consumption and carelessness. Citizens who have never examined any of these issues will be left vulnerable in the face of their long-term consequences. How to achieve sustainability—understood in its broadest definition as including strong communities, economic viability, and a healthy planet—is the democratic conundrum of the day. If it is not solved, everyone’s future well-being will be in jeopardy. Meanwhile, students’ economic options are heavily influenced by two long-term trends: the requirement of a college credential for the twenty-firstcentury employment market, and the inadequacy of federal and state funds that could make higher education more widely available. After World War II, the majority of jobs in the United States did not require a college degree, yet many—especially in unionized fields—offered a middle-class living wage and benefits. Today, a college degree is the credential that a high school diploma once was. According to a 2010 report, Projections of Jobs and Education Requirements through 2018, of the 46.8 million new and replacement job openings in 2018, 34 percent will require a bachelor’s degree or better, while 30 percent will require at least some college or a two-year associate’s degree. (Carnevale, Smith, and Strohl 2010, 110). As the report’s authors describe this societal sea change, "…postsecondary education or training has become the threshold requirement for access to middle-class status and earnings in good times and bad. It is no longer the preferred pathway to middle-class jobs—it is, increasingly, the only pathway" (110). This higher educational bar is imposed as colleges and universities continue to cope with the effects of the recession and budget deficits at both state and federal levels. Higher education is often the vehicle that states use to balance their budgets. The sector does well in good times and is hit harder in lean ones. According to a 2011 report issued by the National Conference of State Legislatures, total state support for higher education institutions fell by 1.5 percent in FY 2009. Without federal funding from the American Reinvestment and Renewal Act (ARRA), this decline would have been 3.4 percent. In 2010, twenty-three states decreased state support of public higher education institutions, even after receiving ARRA funds. Eight of these states reported drops in higher education funding exceeding 5 percent (National Conference of State Legislatures 2011). These compounding factors produce our crucible moment today. The country, the economy, and the world demand a different kind of expertise than was required of graduates after World War II. The kind of graduates we need at this moment in history need to possess a strong propensity for wading into an intensely interdependent, pluralist world. They need to be agile, creative problem solvers who draw their knowledge from multiple perspectives both domestic and global, who approach the world with empathy, and who are ready to act with others to improve the quality of life for all. Another name for these graduates is democratic citizens. In the face of the constellation of forces described in the previous chapter, this crucible moment in US history might look daunting. Certain lessons from the Truman Commission, however, should spur people to action, not paralysis. Despite the ravages of World War II and the resultant worldwide economic devastation, the Commission was ambitious in its scope, calling for bold leadership and investment of public funds and reaffirming the public mission of higher education as a reservoir for progress for the nation and the world. That same visionary leadership is necessary today. The Truman Commission also imagined long-term, systemic change— within both higher education and the nation at large—as an answer to the dire challenges of the day. In a revolutionary stand, the Commission named racial segregation, inequality of any kind, and intolerance as impediments to economic advancement and affronts to democratic values. This twentyfirst-century juncture likewise demands deep structural reforms in higher education and the broader society. As Charles Quigley’s (2011) epigraph to this report states, "Each generation must work…to narrow the gap between the ideals of this nation and the reality of the daily lives of its people." Today, colleges and universities must once again serve as "the carrier~s~ of democratic values, ideals, and process," but for a new age confronting new challenges (President’s Commission on Higher Education 1947a). Putting civic learning at the core rather than the periphery of primary, secondary, and postsecondary education can have far-reaching positive consequences for the country and the economy. It can be a powerful counterforce to the civic deficit and a means of replenishing civic capital. That restored capital, in turn, can function as a self-renewing resource for strengthening democracy and re-establishing vitality, opportunity, and development broadly across the socioeconomic spectrum and even beyond national borders. As Martin Luther King Jr. (2011) accurately noted, we are all "tied in a single garment of destiny." If indeed we seek a democratic society in which the public welfare matters as much as the individual’s welfare, and in which global welfare matters along with national welfare, then education must play its influential part to bring such a society into being. As Ira Harkavy (2011) asserts in the epigraph to this chapter, that will require a commitment to "develop and maintain the particular type of education system conducive to it." A Crucible Moment posits that the nature of that particular type of education must be determined at the local institutional level in order to construct civic-minded colleges and universities. In Chapter I we argued that such campuses are distinguished by a civic ethos governing campus life; civic literacy as a goal for every graduate; civic inquiry integrated within majors, general education, and technical training; and informed civic action in concert with others as lifelong practice. If Chapter I established the urgency of reinvesting in education for democracy and civic responsibility and Chapter II demonstrated that ambitious action was possible in the face of earlier difficult historical eras, this chapter comprises a National Call to Action: recommendations that can begin to erase the current civic learning shortfall. These recommendations are meant to shift and enhance the national dialogue about civic learning and democratic engagement and to mobilize constituents to take action. Everyone has a role and everyone must act, with participation and deliberation across differences as vibrant democracies require. We invite each constituent group to use this report and its National Call to Action as a guideline to chart a course of action—tailoring, for example, the strategies and tasks to be accomplished, the entities responsible for each effort, the partners to be engaged, the timeline for action, and other particulars—that would most effectively respond in the exigencies of this crucible moment. We encourage readers to expand and refine this report’s recommendations and make them locally relevant by institution, region, issue, and demographics. In Appendix A, we provide a mechanism for doing so in the form of tools to help each participating entity develop its own Civic Investment Plan. Readers are encouraged to work collectively within self-designated spheres to develop a plan for exactly what they can and will do to make civic learning and democratic engagement a meaningful national priority. As described in the opening pages of this report, the National Call to Action is the product of a broad coalition of people. The idea for bringing such a group together began with the US Department of Education, which commissioned the report, funded it, and nurtured it. From the beginning, the department acknowledged the widespread civic engagement movement that has been working for decades both on and off campus. The design for the project deliberately drew from that expertise and charged leaders in civic renewal efforts to envision the next frontiers of civic learning and democratic engagement in higher education. Assuming that the best solutions would be generated by people responsible for moving from a set of recommendations to purposeful action, the department charged the National Task Force on Civic Learning and Democratic Engagement with making recommendations—to the government and to higher education—that were informed by the expertise and experience of the leaders and essential partners of the civic renewal movement already underway. A staunch partner in promoting civic learning and democratic engagement throughout the process, the department nonetheless made clear that A Crucible Moment was to be the Task Force’s report not the department’s, prepared in dialogue with a very broad community of advisers. Those advisers who were participants in five different national roundtables, and whose names are listed in Appendix C are civic practitioners, scholars, and administrators. They generated what became an evolving set of specific recommendations included in this chapter. The National Task Force continued to refine the recommendations in subsequent drafts. There was consensus among participants that a successful Call to Action would require multiple leaders collaborating from varying constituencies both within and beyond higher education and within and beyond government agencies. The broad swath of recommendations that emerged reflects that consensus. K–12 education is the cornerstone for both functioning democracies and college readiness. As Ira Harkavy (2011) said in his address at the international conference "Reimagining Democratic Societies," "no effective democratic schooling system, no democratic society. Higher education has the potential to powerfully contribute to the democratic transformation of schools, communities, and societies." Despite all the investment in improving the level of schooling in the United States, particularly over the past quarter century, far too little attention has been paid to education for democracy in public schools. In their foreword to the report Guardian of Democracy: The Civic Mission of Schools, former Justice Sandra Day O’Connor and former Congressman Lee Hamilton note, "Knowledge of our system of governance and our rights and responsibilities as citizens is not passed along through the gene pool. Each generation of Americans must be taught these basics" (2011, 5). The arguments for the civic purpose of K–12 education and the arguments for the civic mission of higher education are similar. Education for democratic engagement is even more urgent than it has ever been, given America’s current diverse populace and global interdependencies. Revealingly, the definition of civic learning put forth in Guardian of Democracy encompasses a continuum across educational levels—in both pedagogy and curricula—that is consistent with an enlarged definition of civic literacies cited in Chapter I of this report, the framework for twenty-first-century civic learning provided in figure 1, and the examples of campus practices featured in Chapter V. Research in 2009 about civic learning in K–12 by Judith Torney-Purta and Britt S. Wilkenfeld echoes findings in higher education. Torney-Purta and Wilkenfeld suggest, for example, that the educational outcomes proceeding from well-constructed civics curricula overlap with the knowledge and skills needed in the workplace. Similarly, their research finds that engaged pedagogies in K–12 that accelerate empowered, student-centered learning also enhance both constructive civic/political participation skills and parallel skills of collaboration, so valuable in the workplace. Finally, they find that classrooms that are civically oriented across multiple kinds of subjects also contribute to students’ motivation to do well and, therefore, to the likelihood that students will stay in school. The Campaign for the Civic Mission of Schools therefore argues there should be three C’s driving reform in K–12 education: college, career, and citizenship (see www.civicmissionofschools.org). Unfortunately, the current public discourse—driven by multiple public, business, and governmental sectors—focuses disproportionately on the first two. The 2011 Educational Testing Services report The Mission of High School voices this concern in a chapter called "A Narrowing of Purpose and Curriculum?" Diane Ravitch is quoted about the grievous consequences to democracy’s health of not setting high expectations across an array of subjects in schools but instead focusing on only a few subjects that are narrowly judged in high stakes testing: "A society that turns its back on the teaching of history encourages mass amnesia, leaving the public ignorant of the important events and ideas of the human past and eroding the civic intelligence needed for the future. A democratic society that fails to teach the younger generation the principles of self-government puts these principles at risk" (Barton and Coley 2011, 25–26). The omission of civic goals for education occurs even in the face of evidence that civic engagement contributes to academic success. As reported by the Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement (CIRCLE), "Longitudinal studies show that young people who serve their community and join civic associations succeed in school and in life better than their peers who do not engage" (Levine 2011, 15). Parallel findings across K–12 and postsecondary education suggest that (1) comprehensive civic goals need to be included in standards to be assessed at state and national levels; (2) civic development for teachers in schools needs to be supported; and (3) schools of education need to integrate civic learning and democratic engagement into the curricula that prepare our nation’s teachers. Recognizing the need for a reinvestment in civic learning, thoughtful K–12 educators and leaders have developed a framework that accords with the vision and argument of this report (see particularly the Campaign for the Civic Mission of Schools 2011a, 2011b, www.civicmissionofschools.org/site/ resources/civiccompetencies.html, and Guardians of Democracy). The timing is right, then, to form sturdy bridges to civic learning and democratic engagement across students’ lifelong learning trajectories. Without K–12 education laying the foundations for civic responsibility and developing students’ understandings of democracy’s history and principles, any hopes of raising national civic literacy and civic agency are likely to be undermined, both for college students and, even more so, for high school graduates who may never enroll in college. They don’t "spill up". micro-politics first stunts moves to macro-politics.Jensen ’9 Oliver Marchart asks the same question in his essay, "Bridging the Micro- Epistemics and foundationalism shouldn’t always be first – – doesn’t guide a better world.Lake 11 These ?ve pathologies combine to divert professional debate from the substance of world politics to ?rst principles. Having created AND what’s more likely to usher in what you fear — voting or not voting? Macro-Institutional starting points are often critiqued. But micro-starting points of SELF or societal, instead of State, transformation are less effective in this narrow context.Stuhr ’8 And then what, now what? What should a meliorist do? Terrible lovers | 1/9/14 |
Hostilities 1AC - ClayTournament: Clay | Round: 4 | Opponent: Kentucky GV | Judge: Brown, Nick Case1ACPlan: The United States Federal Government should preclude the President from initiating warfare without prior authorization from Congress, unless acting to repel armed attacks against the United States.Contention 1 —- R2PU.S. is pushing a norm of Responsibility to Protect —- alienates Russia and China and risks global great power conflictTrombly 11 – Dan Trombly, Ph.D Candidate in International Relations at George Washington University, "The Upending of Sovereignty", 8-27, http://slouchingcolumbia.wordpress.com/2011/08/27/the-upending-of-sovereignty/ The other, truly potent danger of this new set of norms is that it Threat of R2P ruins global cooperation necessary to stop famine, disease, and multiple flashpoints for wrTrombly 11 – Dan Trombly, Ph.D. Candidate in International Affairs at George Washington University, "Responsibility to Protect Ya Neck", 9-3, http://fearhonorinterest.wordpress.com/2011/09/03/responsibility-to-protect-ya-neck/ Advocates should recognize that the world is more peaceful now than it has ever been Famine kills billionsBrown 5 Many Americans see terrorism as the principal threat to security, but for much of Plan stops U.S. implementation of R2P —- Presidents support it, but Congressional control blocksHanania 12 – Richard Hanania, JD Candidate at the University of Chicago Law School and Writer at The Atlantic, "Humanitarian Intervention and the War Powers Debate", The Journal Jurisprudence, (2012) J. JURIS 47, http://www.jurisprudence.com.au/juris13/Hanania.pdf What we see is a public that is generally indifferent to foreign affairs, but Contention 2 —- WarfightingPower projection structurally fails because operations are guided by incoherent strategies disconnected from national political willGallagher 11 – Lieutenant Colonel Joseph V. Gallagher III, United States Marine Corps, "Unconstitutional War: Strategic Risk in the Age of Congressional Abdication", Parameters, Summer, http://strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/parameters/articles/2011summer/gallagher.pdf Understanding the Gap Since World War II, a wide gap has developed between Congress Libya removed all remaining checks on unilateral executive war-making —- ruins accountability and signal of unified resolveWebb 13 – Jim Webb, Former U.S. Senator from Virginia and Secretary of the Navy in the Reagan Administration, "Congressional Abdication", The National Interest, 3-1, http://nationalinterest.org/article/congressional-abdication-8138?page=show The president followed no clear historical standard when he unilaterally decided to use force in That crushes unit cohesion, morale, and allied support —- Congressional approval’s keyFrye 2 – Alton Frye, Presidential Senior Fellow Emeritus and Director of the Program on Congress and Foreign Policy at the Council on Foreign Relations, "Applying the War Powers Resolution to the War on Terrorism", Testimony Before the Senate Judiciary Committee, 4-17, http://www.cfr.org/terrorism/applying-war-powers-resolution-war-terrorism/p4514 4. CONSENSUS IS ESSENTIAL TO NATIONAL COHESION The case for active, continuing congressional Plan boosts credible negotiating power by locking in public and Congressional support prior to conflictGelb 5 – Leslie H. Gelb, President Emeritus of the Council on Foreign Relations and Anne-Marie Slaughter, Dean of the Woodrow Wilson School of International and Public Affairs, "Declare War", The Atlantic, 11-1, http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2005/11/declare-war/304301/?single_page=true-http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2005/11/declare-war/304301/?single_page=true In the wake of the Vietnam War, Congress tried to fix this problem by Effective power projection stops hotspot escalation to nuclear warKagan 7 – Frederick Kagan, Resident Scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, and Michael O’Hanlon, Senior Fellow and Sydney Stein Jr. Chair in Foreign Policy Studies at the Brookings Institution, "The Case for Larger Ground Forces", Stanley Foundation Report, April, http://stanleyfoundation.org/publications/other/Kagan_OHanlon_07.pdf We live at a time when wars not only rage in nearly every region but Executive war power ruins soft power and global alliancesSchiffer 9 – Adam Schiffer, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Political Science at Texas Christian University, and Carrie Liu Currier, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Political Science at Texas Christian University, "War Powers, International Alliances, the President, and Congress", http://apcentral.collegeboard.com/apc/public/repository/US_Gov_Balance_of_Power_SF.pdf The president’s advantages over Congress in the foreign policy realm have consequences far beyond the Grounding use of force in constitutionally-based SOP creates a perception of benign hegemony and encourages international cooperation based on rule of lawIkenberry 1 – G. John, Peter F. Krogh Professor of Global Justice at the School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University, "Getting Hegemony Right - Analysis of the United States as a "Hyperpower" Nation", The National Interest, Spring, Lexis A critical ingredient in stabilizing international relations in a world of radical power disparities is Existential threats are likely —- democratic alliances founded on mutual restraint build capacity to prevent and mitigate their impactIkenberry 11 – G. John Ikenberry, Peter F. Krogh Professor of Global Justice at the School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University, "A World of Our Making", Democracy: A Journal of Ideas, Issue ~2321, Summer, http://www.democracyjournal.org/21/a-world-of-our-making-1.php?page=all-http://www.democracyjournal.org/21/a-world-of-our-making-1.php?page=all Grand Strategy as Liberal Order Building American dominance of the global system will eventually yield Contention 3 —- SOPUnchecked war power sets a precedent that causes the executive to broadly ignore Congressional controlsBarron 8 – David J. Barron, Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and Martin S. Lederman, Visiting Professor of Law at the Georgetown University Law Center, "The Commander in Chief at the Lowest Ebb — A Constitutional History", Harvard Law Review, February, 121 Harv. L. Rev. 941, Lexis Thus, as future administrations contemplate the extent of their own discretion at the " U.S. war powers are modeled internationally —- the precedent of unilateral executive authority ruins global human rights norms and encourages preemptive conflict in multiple hotspotsSloane 8 – Sloane, Associate Professor of Law, Boston University School of Law, 2008 (Robert, Boston University Law Review, April, 88 B.U.L. Rev. 341, Lexis) There is a great deal more constitutional history that arguably bears on the scope of Collapse of human rights norms causes global WMD conflictBurke-White 4 – William W., Lecturer in Public and International Affairs and Senior Special Assistant to the Dean at the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University and Ph.D. at Cambridge, "Human Rights and National Security: The Strategic Correlation", The Harvard Human Rights Journal, Spring, 17 Harv. Hum. Rts. J. 249, Lexis This Article presents a strategic—as opposed to ideological or normative—argument that Conflict’s likely in Taiwan, Georgia, and India/Pakistan —- U.S. signal’s keyRehman 12 – Fehzan Rehman, International Relations at the University of Westminster, "Analyzing America’s National Security Strategy", e-International Relations, 9-13, http://www.e-ir.info/2012/09/13/analyzing-americas-national-security-strategy/ Another implication on sovereignty, due to the NSS, was, yet again, Preemption ruins U.S. leverage to deescalate regional crises —- goes nuclearSteinberg 2 – James B. Steinberg, Vice President and Director of Foreign Policy at the Brookings Institution, Michael E. O’Hanlon and Susan E. Rice, "The New National Security Strategy and Preemption", Brookings Policy Brief Series, December, http://www.brookings.edu/research/papers/2002/12/terrorism-ohanlon The Dangers of Legitimating Preemption A final concern relates to the impact of the precedent Requiring formal declaration of war restores Congressional war powers and balances SOP by checking the ExecutiveWeinberger 9 – Seth Weinberger, Assistant Professor in the Department of Politics and Government at the University of Puget Sound, M.A. and Ph.D. in Political Science from Duke University, "Balancing War Powers in an Age of Terror", The Good Society, 18(2), http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/good_society/v018/18.2.weinberger.html The key to developing a constitutionally, legally, and practically sound balanced theory of Contention 4 —- SolvencyCongress must be the first moverHansen 9 – Hansen and Friedman, professors of law at the New England School of Law, 2009 (Victor and Lawrence, The Case for Congress: Separation of Powers and the War on Terror, p.130) The problem, of course, is that much of this congressional involvement has come Only formal checks signal restraintDamrosch 97 – Lori Fisler Damrosch, Professor of Law at the Columbia University School of Law, "Use of Force and Constitutionalism", Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 36 Colum. J. Transnat’l L. 449, Lexis Structural-institutional explanations, on the other hand, point to features of liberal Plan’s the perfect balance that checks the Executive but preserves defensive capabilitiesLobel 8 – Jules Lobel, Professor at University of Pittsburgh Law School, "War Powers for the 21st Century: The Constitutional Perspective", Testimony Before the Subcommittee on International Organizations, Human Rights and Oversight Committee on Foreign Affairs U.S. House of Representatives, 4-10, http://democrats.foreignaffairs.house.gov/110/lob041008.htm III Revising the War Powers Resolution I believe that it is necessary and possible to Flexibility and speed turns are totally wrongStreichler 8 – Stuart Streichler, Adjunct Faculty at Seattle University School of Law. Ph.D. at Johns Hopkins University; J.D. at the University of Michigan Law School; B.S. at Bowling Green State University, "Mad about Yoo, or Why Worry about the Next Unconstitutional War", The Journal of Law 26 Politics, Winter, 24 J. L. 26 Politics 93, Lexis When Yoo discusses the need for flexibility in the process for warmaking, he creates Plan overcomes barriers to enforcementLobel 9 – Jules Lobel, Professor of Law at the University of Pittsburgh. "Restore. Protect. Expand. Amend the War Powers Resolution". Center for Constitutional Rights White Paper, http://ccrjustice.org files CCR_White_WarPowers.pdf The War Powers Resolution should explicitly prohibit executive acts of war without previous Congressional authorization Obama will complyBarron 8 – David J. Barron, Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and Martin S. Lederman, Visiting Professor of Law at the Georgetown University Law Center, "The Commander in Chief at the Lowest Ebb — A Constitutional History", Harvard Law Review, February, 121 Harv. L. Rev. 941, Lexis In addition to offering important guidance concerning the congressional role, our historical review also Even if initial non-compliance occurs, Court enforcement solvesGarcia 12 – Michael John Garcia, Legislative Attorney at the Congressional Research Service, "War Powers Litigation Initiated by Members of Congress Since the Enactment of the War Powers Resolution", Congressional Research Service Report, 2-17, http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RL30352.pdf The courts have made clear, however, that while formidable, none of the Syria and Asia trip wreck U.S. resolveHurst 10-5 – Steven R. Hurst, International Political Writer for The Associated Press and Former Baghdad Bureau Chief, "Sense Of Unease Growing Around The World As U.S. Government Looks Befuddled", Huffington Post, 2013, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/05/world-us-government_n_4047613.html An unmistakable sense of unease has been growing in capitals around the world as the Increases political costs and solves signal regardlessWilkinson 12 – Will Wilkinson, Research Fellow at the Cato Institute, M.A. in Philosophy from the Northern Illinois University, Academic Coordinator of the Social Change Project and the Global Prosperity Initiative at The Mercatus Center at George Mason University, "Rebridling the Executive", Economist, 4-17, http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2012/04/democracy-and-war I think this is good, sound sense. Fabio Rojas, a professor of Self-interest and normative pressurePildes 12 – Richard H. Pildes, Sudler Family Professor of Constitutional Law at the NYU School of Law and Co-Director of the NYU Center on Law and Security, "Book Review: Law and the President", Harvard Law Review, April, 125 Harv. L. Rev. 1381, Lexis III. The Incomplete Consequentialist Theory for the Role of Law For these reasons, | 10/6/13 |
Hostilities 1AC - Clay 2Tournament: Clay | Round: 2 | Opponent: Cal SW | Judge: Roark The United States Federal Government should preclude the President from initiating warfare without prior authorization from Congress, unless acting to repel armed attacks against the United States.Contention 1 —- R2PU.S. is pushing a norm of Responsibility to Protect —- alienates Russia and China and risks global great power conflictTrombly 11 – Dan Trombly, Ph.D Candidate in International Relations at George Washington University, "The Upending of Sovereignty", 8-27, http://slouchingcolumbia.wordpress.com/2011/08/27/the-upending-of-sovereignty/ The other, truly potent danger of this new set of norms is that it Threat of R2P ruins global cooperation necessary to stop famine, disease, and multiple flashpoints for wrTrombly 11 – Dan Trombly, Ph.D. Candidate in International Affairs at George Washington University, "Responsibility to Protect Ya Neck", 9-3, http://fearhonorinterest.wordpress.com/2011/09/03/responsibility-to-protect-ya-neck/ Advocates should recognize that the world is more peaceful now than it has ever been Famine kills billionsBrown 5 Many Americans see terrorism as the principal threat to security, but for much of Plan stops U.S. implementation of R2P —- Presidents support it, but Congressional control blocksHanania 12 – Richard Hanania, JD Candidate at the University of Chicago Law School and Writer at The Atlantic, "Humanitarian Intervention and the War Powers Debate", The Journal Jurisprudence, (2012) J. JURIS 47, http://www.jurisprudence.com.au/juris13/Hanania.pdf What we see is a public that is generally indifferent to foreign affairs, but Contention 2 —- WarfightingPower projection structurally fails because operations are guided by incoherent strategies disconnected from national political willGallagher 11 – Lieutenant Colonel Joseph V. Gallagher III, United States Marine Corps, "Unconstitutional War: Strategic Risk in the Age of Congressional Abdication", Parameters, Summer, http://strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/parameters/articles/2011summer/gallagher.pdf Understanding the Gap Since World War II, a wide gap has developed between Congress Libya removed all remaining checks on unilateral executive war-making —- ruins accountability and signal of unified resolveWebb 13 – Jim Webb, Former U.S. Senator from Virginia and Secretary of the Navy in the Reagan Administration, "Congressional Abdication", The National Interest, 3-1, http://nationalinterest.org/article/congressional-abdication-8138?page=show The president followed no clear historical standard when he unilaterally decided to use force in That crushes unit cohesion, morale, and allied support —- Congressional approval’s keyFrye 2 – Alton Frye, Presidential Senior Fellow Emeritus and Director of the Program on Congress and Foreign Policy at the Council on Foreign Relations, "Applying the War Powers Resolution to the War on Terrorism", Testimony Before the Senate Judiciary Committee, 4-17, http://www.cfr.org/terrorism/applying-war-powers-resolution-war-terrorism/p4514 4. CONSENSUS IS ESSENTIAL TO NATIONAL COHESION The case for active, continuing congressional Plan boosts credible negotiating power by locking in public and Congressional support prior to conflictGelb 5 – Leslie H. Gelb, President Emeritus of the Council on Foreign Relations and Anne-Marie Slaughter, Dean of the Woodrow Wilson School of International and Public Affairs, "Declare War", The Atlantic, 11-1, http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2005/11/declare-war/304301/?single_page=true-http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2005/11/declare-war/304301/?single_page=true In the wake of the Vietnam War, Congress tried to fix this problem by Effective power projection stops hotspot escalation to nuclear warKagan 7 – Frederick Kagan, Resident Scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, and Michael O’Hanlon, Senior Fellow and Sydney Stein Jr. Chair in Foreign Policy Studies at the Brookings Institution, "The Case for Larger Ground Forces", Stanley Foundation Report, April, http://stanleyfoundation.org/publications/other/Kagan_OHanlon_07.pdf We live at a time when wars not only rage in nearly every region but Executive war power ruins soft power and global alliancesSchiffer 9 – Adam Schiffer, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Political Science at Texas Christian University, and Carrie Liu Currier, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Political Science at Texas Christian University, "War Powers, International Alliances, the President, and Congress", http://apcentral.collegeboard.com/apc/public/repository/US_Gov_Balance_of_Power_SF.pdf The president’s advantages over Congress in the foreign policy realm have consequences far beyond the Grounding use of force in constitutionally-based SOP creates a perception of benign hegemony and encourages international cooperation based on rule of lawIkenberry 1 – G. John, Peter F. Krogh Professor of Global Justice at the School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University, "Getting Hegemony Right - Analysis of the United States as a "Hyperpower" Nation", The National Interest, Spring, Lexis A critical ingredient in stabilizing international relations in a world of radical power disparities is Existential threats are likely —- democratic alliances founded on mutual restraint build capacity to prevent and mitigate their impactIkenberry 11 – G. John Ikenberry, Peter F. Krogh Professor of Global Justice at the School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University, "A World of Our Making", Democracy: A Journal of Ideas, Issue ~2321, Summer, http://www.democracyjournal.org/21/a-world-of-our-making-1.php?page=all-http://www.democracyjournal.org/21/a-world-of-our-making-1.php?page=all Grand Strategy as Liberal Order Building American dominance of the global system will eventually yield Contention 3 —- SOPUnchecked war power sets a precedent that causes the executive to broadly ignore Congressional controlsBarron 8 – David J. Barron, Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and Martin S. Lederman, Visiting Professor of Law at the Georgetown University Law Center, "The Commander in Chief at the Lowest Ebb — A Constitutional History", Harvard Law Review, February, 121 Harv. L. Rev. 941, Lexis Thus, as future administrations contemplate the extent of their own discretion at the " U.S. war powers are modeled internationally —- the precedent of unilateral executive authority ruins global human rights norms and encourages preemptive conflict in multiple hotspotsSloane 8 – Sloane, Associate Professor of Law, Boston University School of Law, 2008 (Robert, Boston University Law Review, April, 88 B.U.L. Rev. 341, Lexis) There is a great deal more constitutional history that arguably bears on the scope of Collapse of human rights norms causes global WMD conflictBurke-White 4 – William W., Lecturer in Public and International Affairs and Senior Special Assistant to the Dean at the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University and Ph.D. at Cambridge, "Human Rights and National Security: The Strategic Correlation", The Harvard Human Rights Journal, Spring, 17 Harv. Hum. Rts. J. 249, Lexis This Article presents a strategic—as opposed to ideological or normative—argument that Conflict’s likely in Taiwan, Georgia, and India/Pakistan —- U.S. signal’s keyRehman 12 – Fehzan Rehman, International Relations at the University of Westminster, "Analyzing America’s National Security Strategy", e-International Relations, 9-13, http://www.e-ir.info/2012/09/13/analyzing-americas-national-security-strategy/ Another implication on sovereignty, due to the NSS, was, yet again, Preemption ruins U.S. leverage to deescalate regional crises —- goes nuclearSteinberg 2 – James B. Steinberg, Vice President and Director of Foreign Policy at the Brookings Institution, Michael E. O’Hanlon and Susan E. Rice, "The New National Security Strategy and Preemption", Brookings Policy Brief Series, December, http://www.brookings.edu/research/papers/2002/12/terrorism-ohanlon The Dangers of Legitimating Preemption A final concern relates to the impact of the precedent Requiring formal declaration of war restores Congressional war powers and balances SOP by checking the ExecutiveWeinberger 9 – Seth Weinberger, Assistant Professor in the Department of Politics and Government at the University of Puget Sound, M.A. and Ph.D. in Political Science from Duke University, "Balancing War Powers in an Age of Terror", The Good Society, 18(2), http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/good_society/v018/18.2.weinberger.html The key to developing a constitutionally, legally, and practically sound balanced theory of Congress must be the first moverHansen 9 – Hansen and Friedman, professors of law at the New England School of Law, 2009 (Victor and Lawrence, The Case for Congress: Separation of Powers and the War on Terror, p.130) The problem, of course, is that much of this congressional involvement has come Only formal checks signal restraintDamrosch 97 – Lori Fisler Damrosch, Professor of Law at the Columbia University School of Law, "Use of Force and Constitutionalism", Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 36 Colum. J. Transnat’l L. 449, Lexis Structural-institutional explanations, on the other hand, point to features of liberal Plan’s the perfect balance that checks the Executive but preserves defensive capabilitiesLobel 8 – Jules Lobel, Professor at University of Pittsburgh Law School, "War Powers for the 21st Century: The Constitutional Perspective", Testimony Before the Subcommittee on International Organizations, Human Rights and Oversight Committee on Foreign Affairs U.S. House of Representatives, 4-10, http://democrats.foreignaffairs.house.gov/110/lob041008.htm III Revising the War Powers Resolution I believe that it is necessary and possible to Flexibility and speed turns are totally wrongStreichler 8 – Stuart Streichler, Adjunct Faculty at Seattle University School of Law. Ph.D. at Johns Hopkins University; J.D. at the University of Michigan Law School; B.S. at Bowling Green State University, "Mad about Yoo, or Why Worry about the Next Unconstitutional War", The Journal of Law 26 Politics, Winter, 24 J. L. 26 Politics 93, Lexis When Yoo discusses the need for flexibility in the process for warmaking, he creates Plan overcomes barriers to enforcementLobel 9 – Jules Lobel, Professor of Law at the University of Pittsburgh. "Restore. Protect. Expand. Amend the War Powers Resolution". Center for Constitutional Rights White Paper, http://ccrjustice.org files CCR_White_WarPowers.pdf The War Powers Resolution should explicitly prohibit executive acts of war without previous Congressional authorization Lack of prior participation causes interference in duration and conduct of warBarron 8 – David J. Barron, Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and Martin S. Lederman, Visiting Professor of Law at the Georgetown University Law Center, "The Commander in Chief at the Lowest Ebb — A Constitutional History", Harvard Law Review, February, 121 Harv. L. Rev. 941, Lexis By the conclusion of the Clinton Administration, however, it appeared that something of Increases political costs and solves signal regardlessWilkinson 12 – Will Wilkinson, Research Fellow at the Cato Institute, M.A. in Philosophy from the Northern Illinois University, Academic Coordinator of the Social Change Project and the Global Prosperity Initiative at The Mercatus Center at George Mason University, "Rebridling the Executive", Economist, 4-17, http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2012/04/democracy-and-war I think this is good, sound sense. Fabio Rojas, a professor of Self-interest and normative pressurePildes 12 – Richard H. Pildes, Sudler Family Professor of Constitutional Law at the NYU School of Law and Co-Director of the NYU Center on Law and Security, "Book Review: Law and the President", Harvard Law Review, April, 125 Harv. L. Rev. 1381, Lexis III. The Incomplete Consequentialist Theory for the Role of Law For these reasons, | 10/5/13 |
Hostilities 1AC - GSU DoublesTournament: GSU | Round: Doubles | Opponent: Wake HS | Judge: Cohn, Paul, Kall Contention 1 —- InterventionCongress has abdicated war powers, leaving no check on unitary executive war-makingPinhiero 11 – John C. Pinhiero, Associate Professor of History at Aquinas College, ""Hostilities" and War Powers: Let’s Choose the Constitution", History News Service, 6-29, http://historynewsservice.org/2011/06/hostilities-and-war-powers-lets-choose-the-constitution/ Last week Rep. Jerrold Nadler of New York warned that "if we don’t Executive war power structurally ensures groupthink and escalatory interventionsFleischman 10 – Matthew Fleischman, J.D. Candidate at New York University School of Law, "A Functional Distribution of War Powers", New York University Journal of Legislation and Public Policy, 13 N.Y.U. J. Legis. 26 Pub. Pol’y 137, Lexis While Nzelibe and Yoo’s model is clearly plausible, it misses certain critical institutional constructs Terrorist spoofingBlumrosen 11 – Alfred W. Blumrosen, Professor Emeritus at the Rutgers School of Law and Steven M. Blumrosen, J.D., Quinnipiac University School of Law, "Restoring the Congressional Duty to Declare War", Rutgers Law Review, Winter, 63 Rutgers L. Rev. 407, Lexis We have placed a heavy burden on June 1-4, 1787 to correct High tempo interventions draw in outside powersFriedman 11 – George Friedman, President of Stratfor Global Forecasting, "What Happened to the American Declaration of War?", Stratfor, 3-29, http://www.stratfor.com/weekly/20110328-what-happened-american-declaration-war An Increasing Tempo of Operations All of this came just before Requiring prior Congressional authorization for war deters adventurismDickerson 9 – Annette Warren Dickerson, Director of Education 26 Outreach for the Center for Constitutional Rights, "Restore. Protect. Expand. Amend the War Powers Resolution", Center for Constitutional Rights White Paper, http://ccrjustice.org/files/CCR_White_WarPowers.pdf The War Powers Resolution has failed. Every president since the enactment of the Act Contention 2 —- WarfightingPower projection structurally fails because operations are guided by incoherent strategies disconnected from national political willGallagher 11 – Lieutenant Colonel Joseph V. Gallagher III, United States Marine Corps, "Unconstitutional War: Strategic Risk in the Age of Congressional Abdication", Parameters, Summer, http://strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/parameters/articles/2011summer/gallagher.pdf Since World War II, a wide gap has developed between Congress and the executive Libya removed all remaining checks on unilateral executive war-making —- ruins accountability and signal of unified resolveWebb 13 – Jim Webb, Former U.S. Senator from Virginia and Secretary of the Navy in the Reagan Administration, "Congressional Abdication", The National Interest, 3-1, http://nationalinterest.org/article/congressional-abdication-8138?page=show The president followed no clear historical standard when he unilaterally decided That crushes unit cohesion, morale, and allied support —- Congressional approval’s keyFrye 2 – Alton Frye, Presidential Senior Fellow Emeritus and Director of the Program on Congress and Foreign Policy at the Council on Foreign Relations, "Applying the War Powers Resolution to the War on Terrorism", Testimony Before the Senate Judiciary Committee, 4-17, http://www.cfr.org/terrorism/applying-war-powers-resolution-war-terrorism/p4514 4. CONSENSUS IS ESSENTIAL TO NATIONAL COHESION Plan boosts credible negotiating power by locking in public and Congressional support prior to conflictGelb 5 – Leslie H. Gelb, President Emeritus of the Council on Foreign Relations and Anne-Marie Slaughter, Dean of the Woodrow Wilson School of International and Public Affairs, "Declare War", The Atlantic, 11-1, http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2005/11/declare-war/304301/?single_page=true-http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2005/11/declare-war/304301/?single_page=true In the wake of the Vietnam War, Congress tried to fix this problem by Effective power projection stops hotspot escalation to nuclear warKagan 7 – Frederick Kagan, Resident Scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, and Michael O’Hanlon, Senior Fellow and Sydney Stein Jr. Chair in Foreign Policy Studies at the Brookings Institution, "The Case for Larger Ground Forces", Stanley Foundation Report, April, http://stanleyfoundation.org/publications/other/Kagan_OHanlon_07.pdf We live at a time when wars not only rage in nearly every region but Executive war power ruins soft power and global alliancesSchiffer 9 – Adam Schiffer, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Political Science at Texas Christian University, and Carrie Liu Currier, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Political Science at Texas Christian University, "War Powers, International Alliances, the President, and Congress", http://apcentral.collegeboard.com/apc/public/repository/US_Gov_Balance_of_Power_SF.pdf The president’s advantages over Congress in the foreign policy realm have consequences far beyond Grounding use of force in constitutionally-based SOP creates a perception of benign hegemony and encourages international cooperation based on rule of lawIkenberry 1 – G. John, Peter F. Krogh Professor of Global Justice at the School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University, "Getting Hegemony Right - Analysis of the United States as a "Hyperpower" Nation", The National Interest, Spring, Lexis A critical ingredient in stabilizing international relations in a world of radical power disparities is Existential threats are likely —- democratic alliances founded on mutual restraint build capacity to prevent and mitigate their impactIkenberry 11 – G. John Ikenberry, Peter F. Krogh Professor of Global Justice at the School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University, "A World of Our Making", Democracy: A Journal of Ideas, Issue ~2321, Summer, http://www.democracyjournal.org/21/a-world-of-our-making-1.php?page=all-http://www.democracyjournal.org/21/a-world-of-our-making-1.php?page=all Grand Strategy as Liberal Order Building Contention 3 —- SOPUnchecked war power sets a precedent that causes the executive to broadly ignore Congressional controlsBarron 8 – David J. Barron, Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and Martin S. Lederman, Visiting Professor of Law at the Georgetown University Law Center, "The Commander in Chief at the Lowest Ebb — A Constitutional History", Harvard Law Review, February, 121 Harv. L. Rev. 941, Lexis Thus, as future administrations contemplate the extent of their own discretion at the " U.S. war powers are modeled internationally —- the precedent of unilateral executive authority ruins global human rights norms and encourages preemptive conflict in multiple hotspotsSloane 8 – Sloane, Associate Professor of Law, Boston University School of Law, 2008 (Robert, Boston University Law Review, April, 88 B.U.L. Rev. 341, Lexis) There is a great deal more constitutional history that arguably bears on the scope of Collapse of human rights norms causes global WMD conflictBurke-White 4 – William W., Lecturer in Public and International Affairs and Senior Special Assistant to the Dean at the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University and Ph.D. at Cambridge, "Human Rights and National Security: The Strategic Correlation", The Harvard Human Rights Journal, Spring, 17 Harv. Hum. Rts. J. 249, Lexis This Article presents a strategic—as opposed to ideological or normative—argument that Conflict’s likely in Taiwan, Georgia, and India/Pakistan —- U.S. signal’s keyRehman 12 – Fehzan Rehman, International Relations at the University of Westminster, "Analyzing America’s National Security Strategy", e-International Relations, 9-13, http://www.e-ir.info/2012/09/13/analyzing-americas-national-security-strategy/ Another implication on sovereignty, due to the NSS, was, yet again, Preemption ruins U.S. leverage to deescalate regional crises —- goes nuclearSteinberg 2 – James B. Steinberg, Vice President and Director of Foreign Policy at the Brookings Institution, Michael E. O’Hanlon and Susan E. Rice, "The New National Security Strategy and Preemption", Brookings Policy Brief Series, December, http://www.brookings.edu/research/papers/2002/12/terrorism-ohanlon The Dangers of Legitimating Preemption Requiring formal declaration of war restores Congressional war powers and balances SOP by checking the ExecutiveWeinberger 9 – Seth Weinberger, Assistant Professor in the Department of Politics and Government at the University of Puget Sound, M.A. and Ph.D. in Political Science from Duke University, "Balancing War Powers in an Age of Terror", The Good Society, 18(2), http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/good_society/v018/18.2.weinberger.html The key to developing a constitutionally, legally, and practically sound balanced theory of Congress must be the first moverHansen 9 – Hansen and Friedman, professors of law at the New England School of Law, 2009 (Victor and Lawrence, The Case for Congress: Separation of Powers and the War on Terror, p.130) The problem, of course, is that much of this congressional involvement has come Only formal checks signal restraintDamrosch 97 – Lori Fisler Damrosch, Professor of Law at the Columbia University School of Law, "Use of Force and Constitutionalism", Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 36 Colum. J. Transnat’l L. 449, Lexis Structural-institutional explanations, on the other hand, point to features of liberal Plan –The United States Federal Government should require Congressional authorization prior to initiating offensive use of military force.Plan’s the perfect balance that checks the Executive but preserves defensive capabilitiesLobel 8 – Jules Lobel, Professor at University of Pittsburgh Law School, "War Powers for the 21st Century: The Constitutional Perspective", Testimony Before the Subcommittee on International Organizations, Human Rights and Oversight Committee on Foreign Affairs U.S. House of Representatives, 4-10, http://democrats.foreignaffairs.house.gov/110/lob041008.htm III Revising the War Powers Resolution I believe that it Obama will complyBarron 8 – David J. Barron, Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and Martin S. Lederman, Visiting Professor of Law at the Georgetown University Law Center, "The Commander in Chief at the Lowest Ebb — A Constitutional History", Harvard Law Review, February, 121 Harv. L. Rev. 941, Lexis In addition to offering important guidance concerning the congressional role, our historical review also Plan overcomes barriers to enforcementLobel 9 – Jules Lobel, Professor of Law at the University of Pittsburgh. "Restore. Protect. Expand. Amend the War Powers Resolution". Center for Constitutional Rights White Paper, http://ccrjustice.org files CCR_White_WarPowers.pdf The War Powers Resolution should explicitly prohibit executive acts of war without previous Even if initial non-compliance occurs, Court enforcement solvesGarcia 12 – Michael John Garcia, Legislative Attorney at the Congressional Research Service, "War Powers Litigation Initiated by Members of Congress Since the Enactment of the War Powers Resolution", Congressional Research Service Report, 2-17, http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RL30352.pdf The courts have made clear, however, that while formidable, none of the | 9/23/13 |
Hostilities 1AC - GSU Round 2Tournament: GSU | Round: 2 | Opponent: Michigan CH | Judge: Severson Contention 1 —- InterventionCongress has abdicated war powers, leaving no check on unitary executive war-makingPinhiero 11 – John C. Pinhiero, Associate Professor of History at Aquinas College, and#34;and#34;Hostilitiesand#34; and War Powers: Let’s Choose the Constitutionand#34;, History News Service, 6-29, http://historynewsservice.org/2011/06/hostilities-and-war-powers-lets-choose-the-constitution/ Last week Rep. Jerrold Nadler of New York warned that and#34;if we don’t Executive war power structurally ensures groupthink and escalatory interventionsFleischman 10 – Matthew Fleischman, J.D. Candidate at New York University School of Law, and#34;A Functional Distribution of War Powersand#34;, New York University Journal of Legislation and Public Policy, 13 N.Y.U. J. Legis. 26 Pub. Pol’y 137, Lexis While Nzelibe and Yoo’s model is clearly plausible, it misses certain critical institutional constructs Those go nuclear —-Accidents and miscalcAdler 8 – David Gray, Professor of Political Science at Idaho State University, and#34;The Judiciary and Presidential Power in Foreign Affairs: A Critiqueand#34;, 6-1, http://www.freerangethought.com/index.php?option=com_content26task=blogsection26id=626Itemid=41 ~and#123;11~} The structure of shared powers in foreign relations serves to deter abuse High tempo interventions draw in outside powersFriedman 11 – George Friedman, President of Stratfor Global Forecasting, and#34;What Happened to the American Declaration of War?and#34;, Stratfor, 3-29, http://www.stratfor.com/weekly/20110328-what-happened-american-declaration-war An Increasing Tempo of Operations Requiring prior Congressional authorization for war deters adventurismBacevich 13 – Andrew, Professor of History and International Relations at Boston University and Ph.D. in American Diplomatic History from Princeton University, The New American Militarism, p. 205-210 There is, wrote H. L. Mencken, and#34;always a well- The process makes conflict less likely, regardless of Congress’ responseGrynaviski 13 – Eric Grynaviski, Professor of Political Science at The George Washington University, and#34;The Bloodstained Spear: Public Reason and Declarations of Warand#34;, International Theory, 5(2), Cambridge Journals Conclusion Contention 2 —- WarfightingPower projection structurally fails because operations are guided by incoherent strategies disconnected from national political willGallagher 11 – Lieutenant Colonel Joseph V. Gallagher III, United States Marine Corps, and#34;Unconstitutional War: Strategic Risk in the Age of Congressional Abdicationand#34;, Parameters, Summer, http://strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/parameters/articles/2011summer/gallagher.pdf Understanding the Gap That crushes unit cohesion, morale, and allied support —- Congressional approval’s keyFrye 2 – Alton Frye, Presidential Senior Fellow Emeritus and Director of the Program on Congress and Foreign Policy at the Council on Foreign Relations, and#34;Applying the War Powers Resolution to the War on Terrorismand#34;, Testimony Before the Senate Judiciary Committee, 4-17, http://www.cfr.org/terrorism/applying-war-powers-resolution-war-terrorism/p4514 4. CONSENSUS IS ESSENTIAL TO NATIONAL COHESION Effective power projection stops hotspot escalation to nuclear warKagan 7 – Frederick Kagan, Resident Scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, and Michael O’Hanlon, Senior Fellow and Sydney Stein Jr. Chair in Foreign Policy Studies at the Brookings Institution, and#34;The Case for Larger Ground Forcesand#34;, Stanley Foundation Report, April, http://stanleyfoundation.org/publications/other/Kagan_OHanlon_07.pdf We live at a time when wars not only rage in nearly every region but This is statistically provenDrezner 5 – Daniel W. Drezner, Professor of International Politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University, Senior Editor at the National Interest, M.A. in Economics and Ph.D. in Political Science from Stanford University, and#34;Gregg Easterbrook, War, and the Dangers of Extrapolationand#34;, 5-25, http://www.danieldrezner.com/archives/002087.html Via Oxblog’s Patrick Belton, I see that Gregg Easterbrook has a cover story in Executive war power ruins soft power and global alliancesSchiffer 9 – Adam Schiffer, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Political Science at Texas Christian University, and Carrie Liu Currier, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Political Science at Texas Christian University, and#34;War Powers, International Alliances, the President, and Congressand#34;, http://apcentral.collegeboard.com/apc/public/repository/US_Gov_Balance_of_Power_SF.pdf The president’s advantages over Congress in the foreign policy realm have consequences far beyond the Restraining use of force builds democratic cooperation that prevents and mitigates food shortagesIkenberry 11 – G. John Ikenberry, Peter F. Krogh Professor of Global Justice at the School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University, and#34;A World of Our Makingand#34;, Democracy: A Journal of Ideas, Issue ~2321, Summer, http://www.democracyjournal.org/21/a-world-of-our-making-1.php?page=all-http://www.democracyjournal.org/21/a-world-of-our-making-1.php?page=all Grand Strategy as Liberal Order Building Food shortages kill billionsBrown 5 Many Americans see terrorism as the principal threat to security, but for much of Contention 3 —- SOPUnchecked war power sets a precedent that causes the executive to broadly ignore Congressional controlsBarron 8 – David J. Barron, Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and Martin S. Lederman, Visiting Professor of Law at the Georgetown University Law Center, and#34;The Commander in Chief at the Lowest Ebb — A Constitutional Historyand#34;, Harvard Law Review, February, 121 Harv. L. Rev. 941, Lexis Thus, as future administrations contemplate the extent of their own discretion at the and#34; U.S. war powers are modeled internationally —- precedent of executive authority encourages preemptive conflict in KoreaSloane 8 – Sloane, Associate Professor of Law, Boston University School of Law, 2008 (Robert, Boston University Law Review, April, 88 B.U.L. Rev. 341, Lexis) There is a great deal more constitutional history that arguably bears on the scope of Risk’s high —- no restraintBlair 13 – David Blair, Chief Foreign Correspondent and Former Diplomatic Editor at The Daily Telegraph, National Post Wire Services, M.Phil in International Relations from Cambridge University, 2012 Foreign Reporter of the Year – The Press Awards, and#34;A Small Incident Could Quickly Escalate into a Korean War That No Side Wantsand#34;, National Post, 4-5, http://news.nationalpost.com/2013/04/05/a-small-incident-could-quickly-escalate-into-a-korean-war-that-no-side-wants/ Despite everything, this crisis will almost certainly not peak with North Korea deciding to Korea escalates —- model of preemption bypasses their defensePulcifer 3 – Ash Pulcifer, U.S. Based Analyst of International Conflicts and Human Rights Activist at the Information Clearing House, and#34;The Dangers Caused By A Policy Of Preemptionand#34;, 3-1, http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article1722.htm Furthermore, North Korea jabbed the sword even deeper into the heart of White House rhetoric when they claimed that This is based on internal documents, not Western IR
| 10/4/13 |
Hostilities 1AC - GSU Round 4Tournament: GSU | Round: 4 | Opponent: Kentucky GV | Judge: Norris 1ACContention 1 —- InterventionCongress has abdicated war powers, leaving no check on unitary executive war-makingPinhiero 11 – John C. Pinhiero, Associate Professor of History at Aquinas College, and#34;and#34;Hostilitiesand#34; and War Powers: Let’s Choose the Constitutionand#34;, History News Service, 6-29, http://historynewsservice.org/2011/06/hostilities-and-war-powers-lets-choose-the-constitution/ Last week Rep. Jerrold Nadler of New York warned that and#34;if we don’t Executive war power structurally ensures groupthink and escalatory interventionsFleischman 10 – Matthew Fleischman, J.D. Candidate at New York University School of Law, and#34;A Functional Distribution of War Powersand#34;, New York University Journal of Legislation and Public Policy, 13 N.Y.U. J. Legis. 26 Pub. Pol’y 137, Lexis While Nzelibe and Yoo’s model is clearly plausible, it misses certain critical institutional constructs Those go nuclear —-Accidents and miscalcAdler 8 – David Gray, Professor of Political Science at Idaho State University, and#34;The Judiciary and Presidential Power in Foreign Affairs: A Critiqueand#34;, 6-1, http://www.freerangethought.com/index.php?option=com_content26task=blogsection26id=626Itemid=41 ~and#123;11~} The structure of shared powers in foreign relations serves to deter abuse High tempo interventions draw in outside powersFriedman 11 – George Friedman, President of Stratfor Global Forecasting, and#34;What Happened to the American Declaration of War?and#34;, Stratfor, 3-29, http://www.stratfor.com/weekly/20110328-what-happened-american-declaration-war An Increasing Tempo of Operations Requiring prior Congressional authorization for war deters adventurismDickerson 9 – Annette Warren Dickerson, Director of Education 26 Outreach for the Center for Constitutional Rights, and#34;Restore. Protect. Expand. Amend the War Powers Resolutionand#34;, Center for Constitutional Rights White Paper, http://ccrjustice.org/files/CCR_White_WarPowers.pdf Reform the War Powers Resolution Contention 2 —- WarfightingPower projection structurally fails because operations are guided by incoherent strategies disconnected from national political willGallagher 11 – Lieutenant Colonel Joseph V. Gallagher III, United States Marine Corps, and#34;Unconstitutional War: Strategic Risk in the Age of Congressional Abdicationand#34;, Parameters, Summer, http://strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/parameters/articles/2011summer/gallagher.pdf Understanding the Gap Libya removed all remaining checks on unilateral executive war-making —- ruins accountability and signal of unified resolveWebb 13 – Jim Webb, Former U.S. Senator from Virginia and Secretary of the Navy in the Reagan Administration, and#34;Congressional Abdicationand#34;, The National Interest, 3-1, http://nationalinterest.org/article/congressional-abdication-8138?page=show The president followed no clear historical standard when he unilaterally decided to use force in Libya. Once this action continued beyond his original definition of and#34;days, not weeks,and#34; into months and months, he did not seek the approval of Congress to continue military activities. And, while administration members may have discussed this matter with some members of Congress, the administration never formally conferred with the legislative branch as a coequal partner in our constitutional system. That crushes unit cohesion, morale, and allied support —- Congressional approval’s keyFrye 2 – Alton Frye, Presidential Senior Fellow Emeritus and Director of the Program on Congress and Foreign Policy at the Council on Foreign Relations, and#34;Applying the War Powers Resolution to the War on Terrorismand#34;, Testimony Before the Senate Judiciary Committee, 4-17, http://www.cfr.org/terrorism/applying-war-powers-resolution-war-terrorism/p4514 4. CONSENSUS IS ESSENTIAL TO NATIONAL COHESION Plan boosts credible negotiating power by locking in public and Congressional support prior to conflictGelb 5 – Leslie H. Gelb, President Emeritus of the Council on Foreign Relations and Anne-Marie Slaughter, Dean of the Woodrow Wilson School of International and Public Affairs, and#34;Declare Warand#34;, The Atlantic, 11-1, http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2005/11/declare-war/304301/?single_page=true-http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2005/11/declare-war/304301/?single_page=true In the wake of the Vietnam War, Congress tried to fix this problem by Effective power projection stops hotspot escalation to nuclear warKagan 7 – Frederick Kagan, Resident Scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, and Michael O’Hanlon, Senior Fellow and Sydney Stein Jr. Chair in Foreign Policy Studies at the Brookings Institution, and#34;The Case for Larger Ground Forcesand#34;, Stanley Foundation Report, April, http://stanleyfoundation.org/publications/other/Kagan_OHanlon_07.pdf We live at a time when wars not only rage in nearly every region but Executive war power ruins soft power and global alliancesSchiffer 9 – Adam Schiffer, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Political Science at Texas Christian University, and Carrie Liu Currier, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Political Science at Texas Christian University, and#34;War Powers, International Alliances, the President, and Congressand#34;, http://apcentral.collegeboard.com/apc/public/repository/US_Gov_Balance_of_Power_SF.pdf The president’s advantages over Congress in the foreign policy realm have consequences far beyond the Grounding use of force in constitutionally-based SOP creates a perception of benign hegemony and encourages international cooperation based on rule of lawIkenberry 1 – G. John, Peter F. Krogh Professor of Global Justice at the School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University, and#34;Getting Hegemony Right - Analysis of the United States as a and#34;Hyperpowerand#34; Nationand#34;, The National Interest, Spring, Lexis A critical ingredient in stabilizing international relations in a world of radical power disparities is Existential threats are likely —- democratic alliances founded on mutual restraint build capacity to prevent and mitigate their impactIkenberry 11 – G. John Ikenberry, Peter F. Krogh Professor of Global Justice at the School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University, and#34;A World of Our Makingand#34;, Democracy: A Journal of Ideas, Issue ~2321, Summer, http://www.democracyjournal.org/21/a-world-of-our-making-1.php?page=all-http://www.democracyjournal.org/21/a-world-of-our-making-1.php?page=all Grand Strategy as Liberal Order Building Contention 3 —- SOPUnchecked war power sets a precedent that causes the executive to broadly ignore Congressional controlsBarron 8 – David J. Barron, Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and Martin S. Lederman, Visiting Professor of Law at the Georgetown University Law Center, and#34;The Commander in Chief at the Lowest Ebb — A Constitutional Historyand#34;, Harvard Law Review, February, 121 Harv. L. Rev. 941, Lexis Thus, as future administrations contemplate the extent of their own discretion at the and#34; U.S. war powers are modeled internationally —- the precedent of unilateral executive authority ruins global human rights norms and encourages preemptive conflict in multiple hotspotsSloane 8 – Sloane, Associate Professor of Law, Boston University School of Law, 2008 (Robert, Boston University Law Review, April, 88 B.U.L. Rev. 341, Lexis) There is a great deal more constitutional history that arguably bears on the scope of Collapse of human rights norms causes global WMD conflictBurke-White 4 – William W., Lecturer in Public and International Affairs and Senior Special Assistant to the Dean at the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University and Ph.D. at Cambridge, and#34;Human Rights and National Security: The Strategic Correlationand#34;, The Harvard Human Rights Journal, Spring, 17 Harv. Hum. Rts. J. 249, Lexis This Article presents a strategic—as opposed to ideological or normative—argument that Conflict’s likely in Taiwan, Georgia, and India/Pakistan —- U.S. signal’s keyRehman 12 – Fehzan Rehman, International Relations at the University of Westminster, and#34;Analyzing America’s National Security Strategyand#34;, e-International Relations, 9-13, http://www.e-ir.info/2012/09/13/analyzing-americas-national-security-strategy/ Another implication on sovereignty, due to the NSS, was, yet again, Preemption ruins U.S. leverage to deescalate regional crises —- goes nuclearSteinberg 2 – James B. Steinberg, Vice President and Director of Foreign Policy at the Brookings Institution, Michael E. O’Hanlon and Susan E. Rice, and#34;The New National Security Strategy and Preemptionand#34;, Brookings Policy Brief Series, December, http://www.brookings.edu/research/papers/2002/12/terrorism-ohanlon The Dangers of Legitimating Preemption Requiring formal declaration of war restores Congressional war powers and balances SOP by checking the ExecutiveWeinberger 9 – Seth Weinberger, Assistant Professor in the Department of Politics and Government at the University of Puget Sound, M.A. and Ph.D. in Political Science from Duke University, and#34;Balancing War Powers in an Age of Terrorand#34;, The Good Society, 18(2), http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/good_society/v018/18.2.weinberger.html The key to developing a constitutionally, legally, and practically sound balanced theory of Congress must be the first moverHansen 9 – Hansen and Friedman, professors of law at the New England School of Law, 2009 (Victor and Lawrence, The Case for Congress: Separation of Powers and the War on Terror, p.130) The problem, of course, is that much of this congressional involvement has come Only formal checks signal restraintDamrosch 97 – Lori Fisler Damrosch, Professor of Law at the Columbia University School of Law, and#34;Use of Force and Constitutionalismand#34;, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 36 Colum. J. Transnat’l L. 449, Lexis Structural-institutional explanations, on the other hand, point to features of liberal Plan –The United States Federal Government should require Congressional authorization prior to initiating offensive use of military force.Plan’s the perfect balance that checks the Executive but preserves defensive capabilitiesLobel 8 – Jules Lobel, Professor at University of Pittsburgh Law School, and#34;War Powers for the 21st Century: The Constitutional Perspectiveand#34;, Testimony Before the Subcommittee on International Organizations, Human Rights and Oversight Committee on Foreign Affairs U.S. House of Representatives, 4-10, http://democrats.foreignaffairs.house.gov/110/lob041008.htm III Revising the War Powers Resolution Obama will complyBarron 8 – David J. Barron, Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and Martin S. Lederman, Visiting Professor of Law at the Georgetown University Law Center, and#34;The Commander in Chief at the Lowest Ebb — A Constitutional Historyand#34;, Harvard Law Review, February, 121 Harv. L. Rev. 941, Lexis In addition to offering important guidance concerning the congressional role, our historical review also Plan overcomes barriers to enforcementLobel 9 – Jules Lobel, Professor of Law at the University of Pittsburgh. and#34;Restore. Protect. Expand. Amend the War Powers Resolutionand#34;. Center for Constitutional Rights White Paper, http://ccrjustice.org files CCR_White_WarPowers.pdf The War Powers Resolution should explicitly prohibit executive acts of war without previous Congressional authorization Even if initial non-compliance occurs, Court enforcement solvesGarcia 12 – Michael John Garcia, Legislative Attorney at the Congressional Research Service, and#34;War Powers Litigation Initiated by Members of Congress Since the Enactment of the War Powers Resolutionand#34;, Congressional Research Service Report, 2-17, http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RL30352.pdf The courts have made clear, however, that while formidable, none of the | 10/4/13 |
Hostilities 1AC - GSU Round 5Tournament: GSU | Round: 5 | Opponent: Northwestern MV | Judge: Malsin 1ACContention 1 —- InterventionCongress has abdicated war powers, leaving no check on unitary executive war-makingPinhiero 11 – John C. Pinhiero, Associate Professor of History at Aquinas College, and#34;and#34;Hostilitiesand#34; and War Powers: Let’s Choose the Constitutionand#34;, History News Service, 6-29, http://historynewsservice.org/2011/06/hostilities-and-war-powers-lets-choose-the-constitution/ Last week Rep. Jerrold Nadler of New York warned that and#34;if we don’t Executive war power structurally ensures groupthink and escalatory interventionsFleischman 10 – Matthew Fleischman, J.D. Candidate at New York University School of Law, and#34;A Functional Distribution of War Powersand#34;, New York University Journal of Legislation and Public Policy, 13 N.Y.U. J. Legis. 26 Pub. Pol’y 137, Lexis While Nzelibe and Yoo’s model is clearly plausible, it misses certain critical institutional constructs Those go nuclear —-Accidents and miscalcAdler 8 – David Gray, Professor of Political Science at Idaho State University, and#34;The Judiciary and Presidential Power in Foreign Affairs: A Critiqueand#34;, 6-1, http://www.freerangethought.com/index.php?option=com_content26task=blogsection26id=626Itemid=41 ~and#123;11~} The structure of shared powers in foreign relations serves to deter abuse Terrorist spoofingBlumrosen 11 – Alfred W. Blumrosen, Professor Emeritus at the Rutgers School of Law and Steven M. Blumrosen, J.D., Quinnipiac University School of Law, and#34;Restoring the Congressional Duty to Declare Warand#34;, Rutgers Law Review, Winter, 63 Rutgers L. Rev. 407, Lexis Conclusion High tempo interventions draw in outside powersFriedman 11 – George Friedman, President of Stratfor Global Forecasting, and#34;What Happened to the American Declaration of War?and#34;, Stratfor, 3-29, http://www.stratfor.com/weekly/20110328-what-happened-american-declaration-war An Increasing Tempo of Operations Requiring prior Congressional authorization for war deters adventurismDickerson 9 – Annette Warren Dickerson, Director of Education 26 Outreach for the Center for Constitutional Rights, and#34;Restore. Protect. Expand. Amend the War Powers Resolutionand#34;, Center for Constitutional Rights White Paper, http://ccrjustice.org/files/CCR_White_WarPowers.pdf Reform the War Powers Resolution Contention 2 —- WarfightingPower projection structurally fails because operations are guided by incoherent strategies disconnected from national political willGallagher 11 – Lieutenant Colonel Joseph V. Gallagher III, United States Marine Corps, and#34;Unconstitutional War: Strategic Risk in the Age of Congressional Abdicationand#34;, Parameters, Summer, http://strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/parameters/articles/2011summer/gallagher.pdf Understanding the Gap Libya removed all remaining checks on unilateral executive war-making —- ruins accountability and signal of unified resolveWebb 13 – Jim Webb, Former U.S. Senator from Virginia and Secretary of the Navy in the Reagan Administration, and#34;Congressional Abdicationand#34;, The National Interest, 3-1, http://nationalinterest.org/article/congressional-abdication-8138?page=show The president followed no clear historical standard when he unilaterally decided to use force in Libya. Once this action continued beyond his original definition of and#34;days, not weeks,and#34; into months and months, he did not seek the approval of Congress to continue military activities. And, while administration members may have discussed this matter with some members of Congress, the administration never formally conferred with the legislative branch as a coequal partner in our constitutional system. That crushes unit cohesion, morale, and allied support —- Congressional approval’s keyFrye 2 – Alton Frye, Presidential Senior Fellow Emeritus and Director of the Program on Congress and Foreign Policy at the Council on Foreign Relations, and#34;Applying the War Powers Resolution to the War on Terrorismand#34;, Testimony Before the Senate Judiciary Committee, 4-17, http://www.cfr.org/terrorism/applying-war-powers-resolution-war-terrorism/p4514 4. CONSENSUS IS ESSENTIAL TO NATIONAL COHESION Plan boosts credible negotiating power by locking in public and Congressional support prior to conflictGelb 5 – Leslie H. Gelb, President Emeritus of the Council on Foreign Relations and Anne-Marie Slaughter, Dean of the Woodrow Wilson School of International and Public Affairs, and#34;Declare Warand#34;, The Atlantic, 11-1, http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2005/11/declare-war/304301/?single_page=true-http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2005/11/declare-war/304301/?single_page=true In the wake of the Vietnam War, Congress tried to fix this problem by Effective power projection stops hotspot escalation to nuclear warKagan 7 – Frederick Kagan, Resident Scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, and Michael O’Hanlon, Senior Fellow and Sydney Stein Jr. Chair in Foreign Policy Studies at the Brookings Institution, and#34;The Case for Larger Ground Forcesand#34;, Stanley Foundation Report, April, http://stanleyfoundation.org/publications/other/Kagan_OHanlon_07.pdf We live at a time when wars not only rage in nearly every region but Executive war power ruins soft power and global alliancesSchiffer 9 – Adam Schiffer, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Political Science at Texas Christian University, and Carrie Liu Currier, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Political Science at Texas Christian University, and#34;War Powers, International Alliances, the President, and Congressand#34;, http://apcentral.collegeboard.com/apc/public/repository/US_Gov_Balance_of_Power_SF.pdf The president’s advantages over Congress in the foreign policy realm have consequences far beyond the Grounding use of force in constitutionally-based SOP creates a perception of benign hegemony and encourages international cooperation based on rule of lawIkenberry 1 – G. John, Peter F. Krogh Professor of Global Justice at the School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University, and#34;Getting Hegemony Right - Analysis of the United States as a and#34;Hyperpowerand#34; Nationand#34;, The National Interest, Spring, Lexis A critical ingredient in stabilizing international relations in a world of radical power disparities is Existential threats are likely —- democratic alliances founded on mutual restraint build capacity to prevent and mitigate their impactIkenberry 11 – G. John Ikenberry, Peter F. Krogh Professor of Global Justice at the School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University, and#34;A World of Our Makingand#34;, Democracy: A Journal of Ideas, Issue ~2321, Summer, http://www.democracyjournal.org/21/a-world-of-our-making-1.php?page=all-http://www.democracyjournal.org/21/a-world-of-our-making-1.php?page=all Grand Strategy as Liberal Order Building Contention 3 —- SOPUnchecked war power sets a precedent that causes the executive to broadly ignore Congressional controlsBarron 8 – David J. Barron, Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and Martin S. Lederman, Visiting Professor of Law at the Georgetown University Law Center, and#34;The Commander in Chief at the Lowest Ebb — A Constitutional Historyand#34;, Harvard Law Review, February, 121 Harv. L. Rev. 941, Lexis Thus, as future administrations contemplate the extent of their own discretion at the and#34; U.S. war powers are modeled internationally —- the precedent of unilateral executive authority ruins global human rights norms and encourages preemptive conflict in multiple hotspotsSloane 8 – Sloane, Associate Professor of Law, Boston University School of Law, 2008 (Robert, Boston University Law Review, April, 88 B.U.L. Rev. 341, Lexis) There is a great deal more constitutional history that arguably bears on the scope of Collapse of human rights norms causes global WMD conflictBurke-White 4 – William W., Lecturer in Public and International Affairs and Senior Special Assistant to the Dean at the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University and Ph.D. at Cambridge, and#34;Human Rights and National Security: The Strategic Correlationand#34;, The Harvard Human Rights Journal, Spring, 17 Harv. Hum. Rts. J. 249, Lexis This Article presents a strategic—as opposed to ideological or normative—argument that Conflict’s likely in Taiwan, Georgia, and India/Pakistan —- U.S. signal’s keyRehman 12 – Fehzan Rehman, International Relations at the University of Westminster, and#34;Analyzing America’s National Security Strategyand#34;, e-International Relations, 9-13, http://www.e-ir.info/2012/09/13/analyzing-americas-national-security-strategy/ Another implication on sovereignty, due to the NSS, was, yet again, Preemption ruins U.S. leverage to deescalate regional crises —- goes nuclearSteinberg 2 – James B. Steinberg, Vice President and Director of Foreign Policy at the Brookings Institution, Michael E. O’Hanlon and Susan E. Rice, and#34;The New National Security Strategy and Preemptionand#34;, Brookings Policy Brief Series, December, http://www.brookings.edu/research/papers/2002/12/terrorism-ohanlon The Dangers of Legitimating Preemption Requiring formal declaration of war restores Congressional war powers and balances SOP by checking the ExecutiveWeinberger 9 – Seth Weinberger, Assistant Professor in the Department of Politics and Government at the University of Puget Sound, M.A. and Ph.D. in Political Science from Duke University, and#34;Balancing War Powers in an Age of Terrorand#34;, The Good Society, 18(2), http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/good_society/v018/18.2.weinberger.html The key to developing a constitutionally, legally, and practically sound balanced theory of Congress must be the first moverHansen 9 – Hansen and Friedman, professors of law at the New England School of Law, 2009 (Victor and Lawrence, The Case for Congress: Separation of Powers and the War on Terror, p.130) The problem, of course, is that much of this congressional involvement has come Only formal checks signal restraintDamrosch 97 – Lori Fisler Damrosch, Professor of Law at the Columbia University School of Law, and#34;Use of Force and Constitutionalismand#34;, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 36 Colum. J. Transnat’l L. 449, Lexis Structural-institutional explanations, on the other hand, point to features of liberal The United States Federal Government should require Congressional authorization prior to initiating offensive use of military force. | 10/4/13 |
Hostilities 1AC - GSU Round 7Tournament: GSU | Round: 7 | Opponent: Georgetown AM | Judge: Hays Watson | 10/4/13 |
Hostilities 1AC - Harvard 1Tournament: Harvard | Round: 1 | Opponent: Wayne JS | Judge: Susko Power projection structurally fails because operations are guided by incoherent strategies disconnected from national political willGallagher 11 – Lieutenant Colonel Joseph V. Gallagher III, United States Marine Corps, "Unconstitutional War: Strategic Risk in the Age of Congressional Abdication", Parameters, Summer, http://strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/parameters/articles/2011summer/gallagher.pdf Understanding the Gap Since World War II, a wide gap has developed between Congress Libya removed all remaining checks on unilateral executive war-making —- ruins accountability and signal of unified resolveWebb 13 – Jim Webb, Former U.S. Senator from Virginia and Secretary of the Navy in the Reagan Administration, "Congressional Abdication", The National Interest, 3-1, http://nationalinterest.org/article/congressional-abdication-8138?page=show The president followed no clear historical standard when he unilaterally decided to use force in That crushes unit cohesion, morale, and allied support —- Congressional approval’s keyFrye 2 – Alton Frye, Presidential Senior Fellow Emeritus and Director of the Program on Congress and Foreign Policy at the Council on Foreign Relations, "Applying the War Powers Resolution to the War on Terrorism", Testimony Before the Senate Judiciary Committee, 4-17, http://www.cfr.org/terrorism/applying-war-powers-resolution-war-terrorism/p4514 4. CONSENSUS IS ESSENTIAL TO NATIONAL COHESION The case for active, continuing congressional Effective power projection stops hotspot escalation to nuclear warO’Hanlon 7 – Frederick Kagan, Resident Scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, and Michael O’Hanlon, Senior Fellow and Sydney Stein Jr. Chair in Foreign Policy Studies at the Brookings Institution, "The Case for Larger Ground Forces", Stanley Foundation Report, April, http://stanleyfoundation.org/publications/other/Kagan_OHanlon_07.pdf We live at a time when wars not only rage in nearly every region but Executive war power ruins soft power and global alliancesSchiffer 9 – Adam Schiffer, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Political Science at Texas Christian University, and Carrie Liu Currier, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Political Science at Texas Christian University, "War Powers, International Alliances, the President, and Congress", http://apcentral.collegeboard.com/apc/public/repository/US_Gov_Balance_of_Power_SF.pdf The president’s advantages over Congress in the foreign policy realm have consequences far beyond the Grounding use of force in constitutionally-based SOP creates a perception of benign hegemony and encourages international cooperation based on rule of lawIkenberry 1 – G. John, Peter F. Krogh Professor of Global Justice at the School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University, "Getting Hegemony Right - Analysis of the United States as a "Hyperpower" Nation", The National Interest, Spring, Lexis A critical ingredient in stabilizing international relations in a world of radical power disparities is Existential threats are likely —- democratic alliances founded on mutual restraint build capacity to prevent and mitigate their impactIkenberry 11 – G. John Ikenberry, Peter F. Krogh Professor of Global Justice at the School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University, "A World of Our Making", Democracy: A Journal of Ideas, Issue ~2321, Summer, http://www.democracyjournal.org/21/a-world-of-our-making-1.php?page=all-http://www.democracyjournal.org/21/a-world-of-our-making-1.php?page=all Grand Strategy as Liberal Order Building American dominance of the global system will eventually yield Plan boosts credible negotiating power by locking in public and Congressional support prior to conflictGelb 5 – Leslie H. Gelb, President Emeritus of the Council on Foreign Relations and Anne-Marie Slaughter, Dean of the Woodrow Wilson School of International and Public Affairs, "Declare War", The Atlantic, 11-1, http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2005/11/declare-war/304301/?single_page=true-http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2005/11/declare-war/304301/?single_page=true That solves the need for intervention and stops overstretchDueck 10 – Colin Dueck, Associate Professor of Public and International Affairs at George Mason University, "Regaining a Realistic Foreign Policy", Policy Review, No. 162, 8-1, http://www.hoover.org/publications/policy-review/article/43426 Fifth, think of diplomacy as simply one tool in America’s foreign policy toolkit, UN – 1ACContention 2—-United NationsExecutive authority over use of force causes huge blowback against the UNStromseth 95 – Jane E. Stromseth, Associate Professor of Law at the Georgetown University Law Center, "Collective Force and Constitutional Responsibility: War Powers in the Post-Cold War Era", University of Miami, October, 50 U. Miami L. Rev. 145, Lexis IV. Conclusion If Somalia and Haiti are any guide, we can expect to Plan locks in prior authorization for U.S. participation in UN operations—-builds support and solves funding and management shortfalls that deck UN effectivenessMcGuinness 9 – Margaret E. McGuinness, Associate Professor at the University of Missouri Law School, "The President, Congress and The Security Council: Counterterrorism And The Use Of Force Through The Internationalist Lens", Willamette Law Review, 45 Willamette L. Rev. 417, Spring, Lexis A. The Value of More Explicit Ex Ante Congressional Involvement in U.S Now’s key to lock in UN effectiveness—-ensures foreign policy legitimacyHirsch 9-24 – Michael Hirsh, Chief Correspondent for National Journal and Former Senior Editor and National Economics Correspondent for Newsweek, "Why the United Nations Is Suddenly Relevant", National Journal, 2013, http://www.defenseone.com/politics/2013/09/why-united-nations-suddenly-relevant/70738/?oref=d-skybox That’s especially the view in Washington, which more often than not sees the big ExtinctionThakur 12 – Ramesh Thakur, Professor of International Relations and Foundation Director of the Centre for Nuclear Nonproliferation and Disarmament at the Australian National University, "The United Nations in Global Governance: Rebalancing Organized Multilateralism for Current and Future Challenges", http://www.un.org/en/ga/president/65/initiatives/GlobalGovernance/Thakur_GA_Thematic_Debate_on_UN_in_GG.pdf The world is interdependent in areas as diverse as financial markets, infectious diseases, Even if it fails, maintaining it as a viable last resort is key to plantary survivalSchlesinger 3 – Steven, Director of the World Policy Institute at New School University, The Record (Kitchener-Waterloo, Ontario), "UN is the World’s Emergency Room; Its Survival Requires U.S. Commitment", 10-4, Lexis The ultimate outcome of the San Francisco Conference is still not known. However, Strong Congressional role spills up to the UN—-creates transparency and legitimacy vital for effective counterterrorismMcGuinness 9 – Margaret E. McGuinness, Associate Professor at the University of Missouri Law School, "The President, Congress and The Security Council: Counterterrorism And The Use Of Force Through The Internationalist Lens", Willamette Law Review, 45 Willamette L. Rev. 417, Spring, Lexis This symposium is focused on the powers of the U.S. presidency, UN CT legitimacy stops AQIM—-threat’s escalating and destabilizes North AfricaCockayne 10 – James Cockayne, Senior Fellow and Director of the New York Office of the Center on Global Terrror, et al., "Implementing the UN Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy in North Africa", September, http://www.globalct.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/North_Africa_Report_Final.pdf It is the volatility and denationalized nature of this approach that leads counterterrorism experts, AQIM’s on the cusp of launching large scale attacks that shatter regional stabilityResnick 13 – Laura Resnick, Research Assistant at University of Pennsylvania, "The Threat We Can’t Ignore", 1-24, http://redandblue.thedp.com/2013/01/the-threat-we-cant-ignore/ While some argue that the North African threat is overrated because AQIM largely seeks to Goes global—-draws in Russia and China—-and AQIM alone causes Sixth Fleet kickoutAlexander 9 – Yonah, Professor at the Inter-University Center for Terrorism Studies and Senior Fellow and Director of the International Center at the Potomac Institute for Policy Studies, et al., "Why The Maghreb Matters: Threats, Opportunities, and Options for Effective American Engagement in North Africa", Potomac Institute Special Report, March, http://www.potomacinstitute.org/images/studies/NorthAfricaPolicyPaper033109.pdf THE CONCERN North Africa (the Maghreb) is a strategically important region for the Sixth Fleet stops Mediterranean gas conflict —- quickly escalatesLuft 10 – Gal, Executive Director at the Institute for the Analysis of Global Security, "Is a Mideast War Brewing over Natural Gas Find?", The Cutting Edge, 7-19, http://www.thecuttingedgenews.com/index.php?article=12392 The discovery of a gigantic natural gas reservoir less than 100 miles off Israel’s coast World War IIIJacobs 11 – Cindy, President at the Generals International, "Regional Conflict Could Spark World War III", Charisma, 4-13, http://www.charismamag.com/index.php/news-old/30682-regional-conflict-could-spark-world-war-iii Many people have been asking me to update them regarding current events on several issues PlanThe United States Federal Government should require a Congressional declaration of war prior to initiating offensive use of military force, unless to repel attacks on the United States and enforce this restriction by prohibiting funds for unauthorized use, stating that a violation would create an impasse with Congress and that separation of powers principles require the Court to decide, stating that a violation is an impeachable offense, and by creating a point of order mechanism that allows any legislator to object to authorization of offensive use of military force and, if sustained, automatically amend such authorization to prohibit funding for such activities.Solvency – 1ACPoint of order mechanism stops circumventionMitchell 9 – Jonathan, Assistant Professor of Law at the George Mason University School of Law, "Legislating Clear-Statement Regimes in National-Security Law", Georgia Law Review, Summer, 43 Ga. L. Rev. 1059, Lexis b. point-of-order mechanisms Congress could establish more effective clear- Plan’s the perfect balance that checks the Executive but preserves defensive capabilitiesLobel 8 – Jules Lobel, Professor at University of Pittsburgh Law School, "War Powers for the 21st Century: The Constitutional Perspective", Testimony Before the Subcommittee on International Organizations, Human Rights and Oversight Committee on Foreign Affairs U.S. House of Representatives, 4-10, http://democrats.foreignaffairs.house.gov/110/lob041008.htm III Revising the War Powers Resolution I believe that it is necessary and possible to | 10/26/13 |
Hostilities 1AC - Harvard 5Tournament: Harvard | Round: 5 | Opponent: Wake DL | Judge: Fitzmier Contention 1—-Presidential WarU.S. is pushing a norm of Responsibility to Protect —- this provokes Russia and China and risks global great power conflictTrombly 11 – Dan Trombly, Ph.D Candidate in International Relations at George Washington University, "The Upending of Sovereignty", 8-27, http://slouchingcolumbia.wordpress.com/2011/08/27/the-upending-of-sovereignty/ The other, truly potent danger of this new set of norms is that it Plan stops U.S. implementation of R2P —- Presidents support it, but Congressional control blocksHanania 12 – Richard Hanania, JD Candidate at the University of Chicago Law School and Writer at The Atlantic, "Humanitarian Intervention and the War Powers Debate", The Journal Jurisprudence, (2012) J. JURIS 47, http://www.jurisprudence.com.au/juris13/Hanania.pdf What we see is a public that is generally indifferent to foreign affairs, but Executive war powers cause preemptive military options—-debating the plan checks abuses of authoritySloane ’8 Preemption blocks effective US-India relations – revoking it is key to space coopSidhu 10 While the political system is a limiting factor in improving relations, this is not Relations solve asteroid deflection – a strike is likely and bad.Bagla 13 Saving humanity from a mega-asteroid strike could be the next big effort in Comparatively outweighs – billions of deaths.McGuire 2 – Bill, Professor of Geohazards at the University College London and One of Britain’s Leading Volcanologists, A Guide to the End of the World, p. 173-174 Probably the only piece of good news that can be taken away from my brief US-India space coop key to travel and setting space templates that are the anti-thesis of imperial space K’s.Mohan ’9 Simulating space policy spurs action, critical thinking, and stops elite techno-scienceKaminski 12 – Amy Paige Kaminski, Senior Policy Advisor to the Chief Scientist at NASA Headquarters and Ph.D. Candidate in Science and Technology Studies at Virginia Tech, "Can the Demos Make a Difference? Prospects for Participatory Democracy in Shaping the Future Course of US Space Exploration", Space Policy, 28(4), November, p. 227-229 Critics of such inclusiveness might contend that lay citizens, lacking techno-scientific expertise PlanThe United States Federal Government should not permit Presidential initiation of military force without prior legislative declaration.Contention 2—-SolvencyLegislative control of war ends the Bush Doctrine—-only structural changes can limit use of forceBacevich 7 Requiring declaration’s is the most likely and effective mechanism for change—-advocacy of institutional solutions makes them more likelyGrynaviski ’13 Conclusion The burden of the argument, thus far, has been to show that Political deliberation about declaration of war promotes agency and decision-making—-reciprocity and public debate facilitates mutual respect that lays the groundwork for cooperation on other issuesGutmann 4 – Dr. Amy Gutmann 4, President and Christopher H. Browne Distinguished Professor of Political Science in the School of Arts and Sciences and Professor of Communication in the Annenberg School for Communication University of Pennsylvania, AND Dennis Thompson, Alfred North Whitehead Professor of Political Philosophy in the Faculty of Arts and Sciences and in the John F. Kennedy School of Government, Emeritus Political Theory, "Why Deliberative Democracy?" press.princeton.edu/chapters/s7869.html WHAT DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY MEANS¶ To go to war is the most consequential decision a Simulated national security law debates preserve agency and enhance decision-making—-avoids cooptionDonohue 13 – Laura K. Donohue 13, Associate Professor of Law, Georgetown Law, 4/11, "National Security Law Pedagogy and the Role of Simulations", http://jnslp.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/National-Security-Law-Pedagogy-and-the-Role-of-Simulations.pdf-http://jnslp.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/National-Security-Law-Pedagogy-and-the-Role-of-Simulations.pdf The concept of simulations as an aspect of higher education, or in the law Contention 3 —- Our HeuristicOur epistemology is particularity. Claims of "all" and "always" are wrong and don’t undercut the Aff. We can advance contingent and particular knowledge without "Big T" Truths. One of the central departures of critical international theory from positivism is the view that Sequencing claim’s wrong. Micro never gets-around to the macro and cedes politics in the interm..Gitlin ’97 Methods and epistemology 1st is wrong – making it an a priori question is counter-productive to its own objectivesChandler ’10 In the special issue, Nicholas Kiersey and Doerthe Rosenow take direct issue with my We should still act in the face of epistemic uncertainty. We can improve as we go.Cochran ’99 To conclude this chapter, while modernist and postmodernist debates continue, while we are If we lose pre-fiat, then we do nothing. But non-concrete activism is WORSE THAN NOTHING. No Framework QUESTION can veer this round from the NEXUS QUESTION OF CONCRETE ALTS. Without those, we’re awful activists.Bryant ’12 I must be in a mood today– half irritated, half amused –because | 11/5/13 |
Hostilities 1AC - Harvard 8Tournament: Harvard | Round: 8 | Opponent: OU CL | Judge: Kirk Contention One is: Executive PrecedentsUnchecked war power sets a precedent now.Barron ’8 The precedent spills-beyond war power. Means executives are unchecked on many issues.Barron ’8 It gets modeled worldwide. Debates about the precedent check preventive wars and other abuses of executive authority.Sloane ’8 Legislative restraints means fewer Executives starting fewer conflicts worldwide. For executive authority, teaching the heuristic of work within institutions is a pre-req.Grynaviski ’13 Conclusion The burden of the argument, thus far, has been to show that Pragmatism’s key in this context. "Root cause" and "cure-alls" won’t check violence.Bacevich ’13 There is, wrote H. L. Mencken, "always a well- Legislative checks solve both advantages. Without them, executive-induced casualties will persist.Zelizer ’11 Preventive war standard causes large death tolls globally.Williams ’12 THE UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES OF FIGHTING THIS ILLEGAL WAR America should be concerned about setting a Contention Two – DronesLack of a legislative role cedes war-fighting to the executive. This drives secretive policy – including the squo’s non-transparent drone policy.Bacevich 13 Twelve and a half years after Congress didn’t declare war on an organization of hundreds Drones can’t be wished-away – they’ll exist in other nations. Even if Congress did little, public light matters. A more-transparent precedent dissuades global use and halts a distinct mechanism for violence versus dissent.Boyle ’13 An important, but overlooked, strategic consequence of the Obama administra - tion’s embrace Drones cause deaths. This ev also proves international experiences are a "starting-point boomerang" shaping oppressive domestic practices.Graham ’10 Such fantasies of high -tech omnipotence are much more than science fiction. As The ability of the President of the United States to initiate use of military force without prior legislative declaration should be restricted.Macro-Institutional starting points are often critiqued. But micro-starting points of SELF or societal, instead of State, transformation are less effective in this narrow context.Stuhr ’8 And then what, now what? What should a meliorist do? Terrible lovers Particularity Thesis. Sweeping claims don’t undercut the Aff. We can advance contingent and particular knowledge without "Big T" Truths.PRICE ’98 One of the central departures of critical international theory from positivism is the view that If we lose pre-fiat, then we do nothing. But non-concrete activism is WORSE THAN NOTHING. No Framework QUESTION can veer this round from the NEXUS QUESTION OF CONCRETE ALTS. Without those, we’re awful activists.Bryant ’12 I must be in a mood today– half irritated, half amused –because Even if "fiat’s not real", and Affs don’t control levers of power today, we advance a heuristic. Without this heuristic of fiat, we’ll re-enforce dangerous nihilism.Hoff ’6 There is no question that helping educational leadership students become self-analytical and reflect Our heuristic’s about CONCRETE and Pragmatic ALTS. It’s important regardless of drones or executive power. Helps us learn to check violence.Small ’6 ( ) Reformism works and won’t entrench oppression. State pessimism’s too extreme and begs the question of this particular interventionOmi’13 In Feagin and Elias’s account, white racist rule in the USA appears unalterable and We’re not pro-State, but we’re "anti-anti State". Some things can ONLY be solved "through the system". Lifting existing POTUS authority is such an issue:Barbrook ’97 I thought that this position is clear from my remarks about the ultra-left Serial Policy Failure wrong and Policy Nihilism Bad.Tallis ’97 If we deny or rubbish the progress that mankind has already made, and at | 11/5/13 |
Hostilities 1AC - NDT 6Tournament: ndt | Round: 6 | Opponent: wake lw | Judge: morris, munoz, woodruff 1Contention one is prez aggression U.S. is pushing a norm of Responsibility to Protect —- this provokes Russia and China and risks global great power conflictTrombly 11 – Dan Trombly, Ph.D Candidate in International Relations at George Washington University, "The Upending of Sovereignty", 8-27, http://slouchingcolumbia.wordpress.com/2011/08/27/the-upending-of-sovereignty/ The other, truly potent danger of this new set of norms is that it Plan stops U.S. implementation of R2P —- Presidents support it, but Congressional control blocksHanania 12 – Richard Hanania, JD Candidate at the University of Chicago Law School and Writer at The Atlantic, "Humanitarian Intervention and the War Powers Debate", The Journal Jurisprudence, (2012) J. JURIS 47, http://www.jurisprudence.com.au/juris13/Hanania.pdf What we see is a public that is generally indifferent to foreign affairs, but Executive war powers cause preemptive military options—-debating the plan checks abuses of authoritySloane ’8 There is a great deal more constitutional history that arguably bears on the scope of Only structural changes can limit use of force—-legislative control’s keyBacevich 7 Requiring declaration’s is the most likely and effective mechanism for change—-advocacy of institutional solutions makes them more likelyGrynaviski ’13 Conclusion The burden of the argument, thus far, has been to show that 2Contention two is China Restoring war power stops Congressional meddling in diplomacy—-it’s growing over the East China SeaCarpenter 13 – Ted Galen Carpenter, Senior Fellow at the Cato Institute and Contributing Editor to The National Interest, "Congress’ Worst-of-Both-Worlds Approach to Foreign Policy", National Interest, 11-13, http://nationalinterest.org/commentary/congress-worst-both-worlds-approach-foreign-policy-9394 The role of Congress in the conduct of foreign policy has become nearly the opposite Congressional interference in day-to-day foreign policy torpedoes US/China cooperationCarpenter 13 – Ted Galen Carpenter, Senior Fellow at the Cato Institute and Contributing Editor to The National Interest, "Dangerous Congressional Meddling in the South China Sea", China US Focus, 8-12, http://www.chinausfocus.com/foreign-policy/dangerous-congressional-meddling-in-the-south-china-sea/ There is a strong argument for a vigorous congressional role in the conduct of U Plan stops spiraling distrustKelly 13 – Robert E. Kelly, Professor of International Relations at Pusan National University, Interview with James Pach, 10/10, "The Diplomat Interviews", The Diplomat, http://thediplomat.com/author-spotlight/2013/10/10/the-diplomat-interviews-robert-e-kelly-2/) Your most recent feature for us argued that the assertiveness of the British Parliament and U.S. Congress over military strikes on Syria was a positive for democracy. In Asia, given flashpoints like North Korea (not to mention Senkaku/Diaoyu and the South China Sea) do you think there could be a risk of misjudgment if the U.S. president is seen as weak or the U.S. as having "war fatigue?" Effective US/China partnership’s vital to fusion energy developmentLightfoot 13 Emerging technologies are empowering both states and non-state actors in the second decade Fusion eats fission waste. Hybrid devices solve fast, even if pure fusion’s difficult A new invention could drastically decrease the need for any additional or expanded geological repositories Yucca’s done – waste’s headed to CarlsbadDavenport 2-24 Carlsbad’s "WIPP" plant stands to become A REPOSITORY and receive the 1st spent fuel shipments.Plumer ’12 (Note for student clarification: "WIPP" stands for "Waste Isolation Pilot Global waste and US on-site storage cause systemic deaths for individuals and large collective genomic death tollsOlson ’95 Reports of increased incidence of human cancers and diseases, particularly in children, as "What does the Neg do about the waste" ?Devolving framework back to a room in Bloomington doesn’t teach responsible answers to that question. In the waste context, abstraction teaches abdication.Cairns ’6 The First Minister is showing leadership in tackling the issue and not running away from 3The United States Federal Government should decrease its authority by removing unitary executive authority to initiate of military force without prior legislative authorization.4Contention 3: Our HeuristicOur heuristic means we learn about the State without being it. It won’t inculcate dominant norms or invert the error. Our framework teaches contingent, but engaged, middle grounds. No State pessimism bias or optimism bias for extreme Alts.Zanotti ’14 By questioning substantialist representations of power and subjects, inquiries on the possibilities of political We’re "State-as-heuristic", not "State-as-descriptor". That distinction matters for Framework and Links. If "fiat’s fake", heuristics still mean we’ll learn contingent toolkit items AND avoid pitfalls of foundational "descriptor" frameworks. Those reify and over-value idealism.Zanotti ’14 Bailing on politically-centered heuristics cements the idea that change happens "out there," beyond people’s reach – makes connecting to larger issues impossibleMcCoy 2 Provide a way for people to see themselves as actors and to be actors. Connecting to larger issues is important, and the ballot’s role should include State theorization. Even if Plan’s never passes, our framework advances a broader heuristic imperative. This teaches a State-inclusive civic engagement that spills to many issues.Liu ’12 A Crucible Moment likewise calls for transformations necessary for this generation. A daunting one is to eliminate persistent inequalities, especially those in the United States determined by income and race, in order to secure the country’s economic and civic future. But the academy must also be a vehicle for tackling other pressing issues—growing global economic inequalities, climate change and environmental degradation, lack of access to quality health care, economic volatility, and more. To do that requires expanding students’ capacities to be civic problem-solvers using all their powers of intellect and inventiveness. Sixty-five years after the Truman Commission, the nation faces a different national and global dynamic than in the aftermath of World War II. A Crucible Moment casts its National Call to Action in the context of five trends that shape this historic juncture. Increase in Democratic nations: In 1950, just over 25 percent of countries in the world could be characterized as electoral democracies (Diamond 2011). In 2010, 59 percent of countries could be characterized in this way (Puddington 2011). Moreover, "in 1975 the number of countries that were ’not free’ exceeded those that were ’free’ by 50 percent, ~but~ by 2007 twice as many countries were ’free’ as were ’not free’ (Goldstone 2010, 1). According to an official statement released by the Arab Network for the Study of Democracy, the Arab Spring of 2011 brought people in seven countries to the streets united by three notions: freedom, dignity, and justice (Lee 2011). These shifts offer significant opportunities for revitalizing all democracies, both old and new, as modern democracies learn collectively how to recalibrate democratic processes to meet the new demands of a globalized age. Intensified Global Competition: After World War II, the United States competed only with the Soviet Union for global domination as other nations were busy either putting their devastated economies back in order or developing them. Today, powerful new economies exist on every continent. The European Union is challenging US economic domination, and there is a decided tilt toward the Asian markets of China, India, and Japan. In this globalized world, the budgets of many multinational companies are larger than those of many countries, and they are not bound in their practices by any one nation. Dangerous Economic Inequalities: While the United States had been moving toward a diamond-shaped economy with a larger middle class, recent years have seen an increased gulf between rich and poor across US households. Economist Edward N. Wolff notes, for example, that between 2007 and mid 2009 there was "a fairly steep rise in wealth inequality ~where~ the share of the top 1 percent advanced from 34.6 to 37.1 percent, that of the top 5 percent from 61.8 to 65 percent, and that of the top quintile from 85 to 87.7 percent, while that of second quintile fell from 10.9 to 10 percent, that of the middle quintile from 4 to 3.1 percent, and that of the bottom two quintiles from 0.2 to -0.8 percent" (Wolff 2010, 33). In sum, as of 2009, nearly 90 percent of wealth was concentrated among the top 20 percent of US households, while just over 10 percent of wealth was spread across the remaining 80 percent. One result of this hyper-consolidation of wealth is that for the first time in US history, the younger generation is not on a trajectory to achieve their parents’ economic level. These same economic inequalities are even more dramatic in a global context. According to former UN Humanitarian Relief Coordinator Jan Egeland. "The richest individuals are richer than several of the poorest nations combined—a few billionaires are richer than the poorest two billion people" ( http://ucatlas. ucsc.edu/income.php). Economist Branko Milanovic (2000) has found that the ratio of the average income of the top 5 percent of the world’s population to the bottom 5 percent increased from 78 to 1 in 1988 to 114 to 1 in 1993. In the case of sub-Saharan Africa, a whole region has been left behind: it will account for almost one-third of world poverty in 2015, up from one-fifth in 1990 (United Nations Development Programme 2007). Demographic Diversity: The United States is "the most religiously diverse nation on earth" (Eck 2002, 4), and is more racially diverse than ever. By 2045 communities of color will constitute at least 50 percent nationwide (Roberts 2008), as is already the case in some states. Immigrants now make up 12.5 percent of the US population (Gryn and Larsen 2010). Intensified immigration and refugee populations swirling around the entire globe have resulted in similarly dramatic demographic shifts on almost every continent. Having the capacity to draw on core democratic processes to negotiate the increased diversity will secure a stable future. technological Advances: In 1945, televisions were a rarity and many sections of the country were just getting telephone lines and electricity. The impact of computers and information technology today is reminiscent of the transformation wrought by the Industrial Age: all facets of everyday livingare affected, from communication to health care, from industry to energy, and from educational pedagogies to democratic practices. The Internet— particularly the development of social media to organize groups of people around commonly shared values—influences democratic engagement and activism, as dramatically illustrated by the 2011 Arab Spring and the 2008 US presidential election. While the historical dynamics that shaped the Truman Commission’s findings may differ from today’s political and social environment, a number of stubborn problems that existed then continue to erode the foundation of our democracy. The most pressing of these are unequal access to college and economic lethargy. Although access has increased dramatically, unequal access continues to plague democracy’s ability to thrive. Students are underprepared for college because of what writer and educator Jonathan Kozol (1991) refers to as "the savage inequalities" of the nation’s K–12 system. The poorer the young person, the less likely he or she will go to college. Yet SAT scores, which directly correlate with income, continue to determine many students’ qualifications to attend college. Failure to graduate from high school shuts off college as an option for nearly 30 percent of our nation’s young people; researchers James Heckman and Paul LaFontaine (2007) note that high school graduation rates have leveled or declined over four decades, and the "majority/minority graduation rate differentials are substantial and have not converged over the past 35 years." In a new foreword to The Drama of Diversity and Democracy: Higher Education and American Commitments, Ramón A. Gutiérrez illustrates Latinos’ attrition along the educational pipeline in the United States. While they are the fastest growing racial minority, surpassing the percentage of African Americans, education is not providing a democratic pathway to economic independence or social mobility. Drawing on research by Armida Ornelas and Daniel Solórzano, Gutiérrez explains that "of every one hundred Latinos who enroll in elementary school, fifty-three will drop out," and of the forty-seven who graduate from high school, "only twenty-six will pursue some form of postsecondary education" and "only eight will graduate with baccalaureate degrees" (Gutiérrez 2011, xvi). In the face of troubling discrepancies among racial and socioeconomic groups, there is some good news in the longer term regarding the nation’s increasing college graduation rates. In 1940, only 24 percent of the population 25 years and older had completed high school, and just under 5 percent held a bachelor’s degree (Bauman and Graf 2003). Seventy years later, those numbers have progressed dramatically. "Of the 3.2 million youth age 16 to 24 who graduated from high school between January and October 2010, about 2.2 million (68.1 percent) were enrolled in college in October 2010" (Bureau of Labor Statistics 2011). Overall college graduation rates have also improved: the Digest of Education Statistics 2010, for example, reports that for those seeking the bachelor’s degree, the rate of graduation within four years has reached 36.4 percent. Within six years, it jumps to 57.2 percent. For those seeking an associate’s degree, the graduation rate within six years is 27.5 percent (Snyder and Dillow 2011). According to the 2011 Education at a Glance report completed by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), the labor force in the United States is among the world’s top five most highly educated. However, OECD’s report explains, "The US is the only country where attainment levels among those just entering the labor market (25–34 year-olds) do not exceed those about to leave the labor market (55–64 yearolds)." As a result, "among 25–34 year-olds, the US ranks 15th among 34 OECD countries in tertiary attainment" (OECD 2011, 2). In other words, the educational attainment level in the United States has remained relatively flat while other countries have rapidly increased and surpassed us. An attainment rate that qualified the United States to be near the top of the world several decades ago is not a guarantee of retaining world leadership educationally. Neither graduation rates nor attainment rates that were sufficient in the past are satisfactory today, when two-thirds of future jobs will require some type of postsecondary credential. There is a strong link between educational level and preparedness for a newly demanding workplace, just as there is a strong link between educational level and other civic indicators, including voting. A high-quality education, workforce preparation, and civic engagement are inextricably linked. A college education—who has access to it, and who completes the degree—affects personal ambitions, the economy, and civic participation. After World War II, the United States invested in higher education as a vehicle to jump-start economic expansion. The community college sector in particular was dramatically expanded to provide people with new access to college and new technical skills. In today’s economy, higher education is once again viewed as a way graduates can achieve greater economic mobility and our lethargic economy can be stimulated. In 1947, with the world in shambles, new structures, alliances, and programs were created in an attempt to avert future catastrophic wars, to reconstruct multiple economies, and to establish common principles of justice and equality. As the Truman Commission demonstrates, political and educational leaders agreed that higher education was needed to educate students for international understanding and cooperation to secure a sustainable future. Although today’s world is more globally integrated financially, culturally, and demographically, it is also fraught with civil and regional wars, clashing values, and environmental challenges wrought by rapacious consumption and carelessness. Citizens who have never examined any of these issues will be left vulnerable in the face of their long-term consequences. How to achieve sustainability—understood in its broadest definition as including strong communities, economic viability, and a healthy planet—is the democratic conundrum of the day. If it is not solved, everyone’s future well-being will be in jeopardy. Meanwhile, students’ economic options are heavily influenced by two long-term trends: the requirement of a college credential for the twenty-firstcentury employment market, and the inadequacy of federal and state funds that could make higher education more widely available. After World War II, the majority of jobs in the United States did not require a college degree, yet many—especially in unionized fields—offered a middle-class living wage and benefits. Today, a college degree is the credential that a high school diploma once was. According to a 2010 report, Projections of Jobs and Education Requirements through 2018, of the 46.8 million new and replacement job openings in 2018, 34 percent will require a bachelor’s degree or better, while 30 percent will require at least some college or a two-year associate’s degree. (Carnevale, Smith, and Strohl 2010, 110). As the report’s authors describe this societal sea change, "…postsecondary education or training has become the threshold requirement for access to middle-class status and earnings in good times and bad. It is no longer the preferred pathway to middle-class jobs—it is, increasingly, the only pathway" (110). This higher educational bar is imposed as colleges and universities continue to cope with the effects of the recession and budget deficits at both state and federal levels. Higher education is often the vehicle that states use to balance their budgets. The sector does well in good times and is hit harder in lean ones. According to a 2011 report issued by the National Conference of State Legislatures, total state support for higher education institutions fell by 1.5 percent in FY 2009. Without federal funding from the American Reinvestment and Renewal Act (ARRA), this decline would have been 3.4 percent. In 2010, twenty-three states decreased state support of public higher education institutions, even after receiving ARRA funds. Eight of these states reported drops in higher education funding exceeding 5 percent (National Conference of State Legislatures 2011). These compounding factors produce our crucible moment today. The country, the economy, and the world demand a different kind of expertise than was required of graduates after World War II. The kind of graduates we need at this moment in history need to possess a strong propensity for wading into an intensely interdependent, pluralist world. They need to be agile, creative problem solvers who draw their knowledge from multiple perspectives both domestic and global, who approach the world with empathy, and who are ready to act with others to improve the quality of life for all. Another name for these graduates is democratic citizens. In the face of the constellation of forces described in the previous chapter, this crucible moment in US history might look daunting. Certain lessons from the Truman Commission, however, should spur people to action, not paralysis. Despite the ravages of World War II and the resultant worldwide economic devastation, the Commission was ambitious in its scope, calling for bold leadership and investment of public funds and reaffirming the public mission of higher education as a reservoir for progress for the nation and the world. That same visionary leadership is necessary today. The Truman Commission also imagined long-term, systemic change— within both higher education and the nation at large—as an answer to the dire challenges of the day. In a revolutionary stand, the Commission named racial segregation, inequality of any kind, and intolerance as impediments to economic advancement and affronts to democratic values. This twentyfirst-century juncture likewise demands deep structural reforms in higher education and the broader society. As Charles Quigley’s (2011) epigraph to this report states, "Each generation must work…to narrow the gap between the ideals of this nation and the reality of the daily lives of its people." Today, colleges and universities must once again serve as "the carrier~s~ of democratic values, ideals, and process," but for a new age confronting new challenges (President’s Commission on Higher Education 1947a). Putting civic learning at the core rather than the periphery of primary, secondary, and postsecondary education can have far-reaching positive consequences for the country and the economy. It can be a powerful counterforce to the civic deficit and a means of replenishing civic capital. That restored capital, in turn, can function as a self-renewing resource for strengthening democracy and re-establishing vitality, opportunity, and development broadly across the socioeconomic spectrum and even beyond national borders. As Martin Luther King Jr. (2011) accurately noted, we are all "tied in a single garment of destiny." If indeed we seek a democratic society in which the public welfare matters as much as the individual’s welfare, and in which global welfare matters along with national welfare, then education must play its influential part to bring such a society into being. As Ira Harkavy (2011) asserts in the epigraph to this chapter, that will require a commitment to "develop and maintain the particular type of education system conducive to it." A Crucible Moment posits that the nature of that particular type of education must be determined at the local institutional level in order to construct civic-minded colleges and universities. In Chapter I we argued that such campuses are distinguished by a civic ethos governing campus life; civic literacy as a goal for every graduate; civic inquiry integrated within majors, general education, and technical training; and informed civic action in concert with others as lifelong practice. If Chapter I established the urgency of reinvesting in education for democracy and civic responsibility and Chapter II demonstrated that ambitious action was possible in the face of earlier difficult historical eras, this chapter comprises a National Call to Action: recommendations that can begin to erase the current civic learning shortfall. These recommendations are meant to shift and enhance the national dialogue about civic learning and democratic engagement and to mobilize constituents to take action. Everyone has a role and everyone must act, with participation and deliberation across differences as vibrant democracies require. We invite each constituent group to use this report and its National Call to Action as a guideline to chart a course of action—tailoring, for example, the strategies and tasks to be accomplished, the entities responsible for each effort, the partners to be engaged, the timeline for action, and other particulars—that would most effectively respond in the exigencies of this crucible moment. We encourage readers to expand and refine this report’s recommendations and make them locally relevant by institution, region, issue, and demographics. In Appendix A, we provide a mechanism for doing so in the form of tools to help each participating entity develop its own Civic Investment Plan. Readers are encouraged to work collectively within self-designated spheres to develop a plan for exactly what they can and will do to make civic learning and democratic engagement a meaningful national priority. As described in the opening pages of this report, the National Call to Action is the product of a broad coalition of people. The idea for bringing such a group together began with the US Department of Education, which commissioned the report, funded it, and nurtured it. From the beginning, the department acknowledged the widespread civic engagement movement that has been working for decades both on and off campus. The design for the project deliberately drew from that expertise and charged leaders in civic renewal efforts to envision the next frontiers of civic learning and democratic engagement in higher education. Assuming that the best solutions would be generated by people responsible for moving from a set of recommendations to purposeful action, the department charged the National Task Force on Civic Learning and Democratic Engagement with making recommendations—to the government and to higher education—that were informed by the expertise and experience of the leaders and essential partners of the civic renewal movement already underway. A staunch partner in promoting civic learning and democratic engagement throughout the process, the department nonetheless made clear that A Crucible Moment was to be the Task Force’s report not the department’s, prepared in dialogue with a very broad community of advisers. Those advisers who were participants in five different national roundtables, and whose names are listed in Appendix C are civic practitioners, scholars, and administrators. They generated what became an evolving set of specific recommendations included in this chapter. The National Task Force continued to refine the recommendations in subsequent drafts. There was consensus among participants that a successful Call to Action would require multiple leaders collaborating from varying constituencies both within and beyond higher education and within and beyond government agencies. The broad swath of recommendations that emerged reflects that consensus. K–12 education is the cornerstone for both functioning democracies and college readiness. As Ira Harkavy (2011) said in his address at the international conference "Reimagining Democratic Societies," "no effective democratic schooling system, no democratic society. Higher education has the potential to powerfully contribute to the democratic transformation of schools, communities, and societies." Despite all the investment in improving the level of schooling in the United States, particularly over the past quarter century, far too little attention has been paid to education for democracy in public schools. In their foreword to the report Guardian of Democracy: The Civic Mission of Schools, former Justice Sandra Day O’Connor and former Congressman Lee Hamilton note, "Knowledge of our system of governance and our rights and responsibilities as citizens is not passed along through the gene pool. Each generation of Americans must be taught these basics" (2011, 5). The arguments for the civic purpose of K–12 education and the arguments for the civic mission of higher education are similar. Education for democratic engagement is even more urgent than it has ever been, given America’s current diverse populace and global interdependencies. Revealingly, the definition of civic learning put forth in Guardian of Democracy encompasses a continuum across educational levels—in both pedagogy and curricula—that is consistent with an enlarged definition of civic literacies cited in Chapter I of this report, the framework for twenty-first-century civic learning provided in figure 1, and the examples of campus practices featured in Chapter V. Research in 2009 about civic learning in K–12 by Judith Torney-Purta and Britt S. Wilkenfeld echoes findings in higher education. Torney-Purta and Wilkenfeld suggest, for example, that the educational outcomes proceeding from well-constructed civics curricula overlap with the knowledge and skills needed in the workplace. Similarly, their research finds that engaged pedagogies in K–12 that accelerate empowered, student-centered learning also enhance both constructive civic/political participation skills and parallel skills of collaboration, so valuable in the workplace. Finally, they find that classrooms that are civically oriented across multiple kinds of subjects also contribute to students’ motivation to do well and, therefore, to the likelihood that students will stay in school. The Campaign for the Civic Mission of Schools therefore argues there should be three C’s driving reform in K–12 education: college, career, and citizenship (see www.civicmissionofschools.org). Unfortunately, the current public discourse—driven by multiple public, business, and governmental sectors—focuses disproportionately on the first two. The 2011 Educational Testing Services report The Mission of High School voices this concern in a chapter called "A Narrowing of Purpose and Curriculum?" Diane Ravitch is quoted about the grievous consequences to democracy’s health of not setting high expectations across an array of subjects in schools but instead focusing on only a few subjects that are narrowly judged in high stakes testing: "A society that turns its back on the teaching of history encourages mass amnesia, leaving the public ignorant of the important events and ideas of the human past and eroding the civic intelligence needed for the future. A democratic society that fails to teach the younger generation the principles of self-government puts these principles at risk" (Barton and Coley 2011, 25–26). The omission of civic goals for education occurs even in the face of evidence that civic engagement contributes to academic success. As reported by the Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement (CIRCLE), "Longitudinal studies show that young people who serve their community and join civic associations succeed in school and in life better than their peers who do not engage" (Levine 2011, 15). Parallel findings across K–12 and postsecondary education suggest that (1) comprehensive civic goals need to be included in standards to be assessed at state and national levels; (2) civic development for teachers in schools needs to be supported; and (3) schools of education need to integrate civic learning and democratic engagement into the curricula that prepare our nation’s teachers. Recognizing the need for a reinvestment in civic learning, thoughtful K–12 educators and leaders have developed a framework that accords with the vision and argument of this report (see particularly the Campaign for the Civic Mission of Schools 2011a, 2011b, www.civicmissionofschools.org/site/ resources/civiccompetencies.html, and Guardians of Democracy). The timing is right, then, to form sturdy bridges to civic learning and democratic engagement across students’ lifelong learning trajectories. Without K–12 education laying the foundations for civic responsibility and developing students’ understandings of democracy’s history and principles, any hopes of raising national civic literacy and civic agency are likely to be undermined, both for college students and, even more so, for high school graduates who may never enroll in college. The heuristic’s impact is enormous. It includes this room, but extends beyond it.Liu ’12 We therefore invite all stakeholders in America’s future to join together to become civic agents Focusing exclusively on ourselves or on our local community is insular and glorifies intent and authenticity at the expense of transformative outcomesChandler ’7 Overvaluing intent undervalues outcomes. Insisting on individual, authentic rejection of the state as an ethical question is net worseZanotti ’14 In a similar vein, in a refreshing reading of realism, Brent Steele has And, if the debate winds-up a "tie", presumption should shift in favor of change – best avoids nihilism.Particularity Thesis – We can advance accurate and contingent "small-T" truth claims without linking to broader theorization.Reinalda ’4 Middle-range theories The discussion between rationalists and constructivists is not limited to substantive | 3/29/14 |
Hostilities 1AC - Texas 1Tournament: Texas | Round: 1 | Opponent: Wake DL | Judge: Cook Presidential AggressionU.S. is pushing a norm of Responsibility to Protect —- this provokes Russia and China and risks global great power conflictTrombly 11 – Dan Trombly, Ph.D Candidate in International Relations at George Washington University, "The Upending of Sovereignty", 8-27, http://slouchingcolumbia.wordpress.com/2011/08/27/the-upending-of-sovereignty/ The other, truly potent danger of this new set of norms is that it Plan stops U.S. implementation of R2P —- Presidents support it, but Congressional control blocksHanania 12 – Richard Hanania, JD Candidate at the University of Chicago Law School and Writer at The Atlantic, "Humanitarian Intervention and the War Powers Debate", The Journal Jurisprudence, (2012) J. JURIS 47, http://www.jurisprudence.com.au/juris13/Hanania.pdf What we see is a public that is generally indifferent to foreign affairs, but Executive war powers cause preemptive military options—-debating the plan checks abuses of authoritySloane ’8 There is a great deal more constitutional history that arguably bears on the scope of Only structural changes can limit use of force—-legislative control’s keyBacevich 7 Requiring declaration’s is the most likely and effective mechanism for change—-advocacy of institutional solutions makes them more likelyGrynaviski ’13 Japan – 1ACFormalizing Congressional war power creates a clear model that shapes Japanese constitutionalismMartin 11 – Craig Martin Visiting Assistant Professor at the University of Baltimore School of Law Winter 2011 "Taking War Seriously: A Model for Constitutional Constraints on the Use of Force in Compliance with International Law" 76 Brooklyn L. Rev. 611 Lexis There are several reasons for choosing to develop the mechanism in this fashion, but Japan models Congressional war powers—-plan stops Article 9 revisionShibata 3 – Byron Shibata Assistant Professor, Law Faculty, Ritsumeikan University 2003 "The Spirit of Civilian Control Over the Military: Lessons from the United States Constitution" Ritsumeikan Law Review http://www.ritsumei.ac. jp/acd cg/law/lex/rlr19/shibata.pdf I?Introduction Since the Persian Gulf War in 1991, the world community, That undermines US/Japan relationsMatsumura 6 – Masahiro Matsumura, Visiting Fellow at the Brooking Institution, "Prudence and Realism in Japan’s Nuclear Options", Brookings Institution Report, November 10, http://www.brookings.edu/research/opinions/2006/11/10japan-matsumura The world is watching Japan’s reaction to North Korea’s nuclear test for signs that it US/Japan relations are key to fusion energy development INTRODUCTION One of the initiatives developed at the 1978 Carter-Fukuda Summit was bilateral Fusion eats fission waste. Hybrid devices solve fast, even if pure fusion’s difficult A new invention could drastically decrease the need for any additional or expanded geological repositories Current reactors need annual milling. Each time, millions of systemic deaths occur through radon or water release.Resnikoff ’95 For each year’s operation of a CANDU reactor, uranium must be mined and milled Not apocalyptic exaggeration. If anything, we underestimate radon deaths.Resnikoff ’95 RADON, a decay product of radium, is an inert, radioactive gas which PlanThe United States Federal Government should decrease its authority by no longer permitting the Executive Branch’s unitary initiation of offensive military force without prior Congressional authorization.1AC – HeuristicMacro-Institutional starting points are often critiqued. But micro-starting points of SELF or societal, instead of State, transformation are less effective in this narrow context.Stuhr ’8 And then what, now what? What should a meliorist do? Terrible lovers Don’t subscribe to claims of "all" or "always" – Prefer the particularity of our contingent truth claimsReinalda ’4 Middle-range theories The discussion between rationalists and constructivists is not limited to substantive issues such as the origin of preferences and the impact of ideational factors. It also extends to the question of the role theory should play in social science. Some constructivists would go as far as to reject the rationalist position completely on epistemological grounds. They consider the starting point of individual actors giving meaning to, or constructing, their environment as inherently irreconcilable with the behaviouralism of many rationalists and see the hitters" interest in sweeping generalizations (sec. for a discussion of this position. Price and Reus-Smit 1998; Zehfuss 2002: 5-6, 38-9). We take a so-called middle-ground position (see Adler 1997). In our attempt to account for processes of decision making within international organizations and their outcomes, the optimal strategy may be to look for contingent generalizations for particular phenomena, or what has been called "small-t~heory|-claims" (Price and Reus-Smit 1998: 275). With regard to decision making within international organizations, these contingent generalizations may pertain to process characteristics such as agenda setting and organizational learning, the impact of actors, such as bureaucratic agencies within an international organization and NGOs, on particular policies, or specific tools of influence such as expert knowledge, shaming or the power of the purse. Explicit research questions regarding particular phenomena will resolve the problem of the extent to which insights from rationalism should take precedence over insights from constructivism (see Verbeek 2000). This "smaIl-t-claim" approach has already been practised extensively in the subdiscipline of comparative foreign policy analysis (see Neack el al. 1995: 4-5). Over the years scholars in foreign policy analysis have accumulated a toolbox of theoretical approaches, some better refined than others, that aim at accounting for classes of particular phenomena, rather than attempting to formulate a general theory of foreign policy (see Hermann and Sundelius 2004). Research informed by these theories often is conducted through single or multiple comparative case studies (see George and McKeown 1985; George 1993). Interestingly, many of these so-called middle-range theories deal with decision making, albeit within the nation state. They include, amongst others, theories of national role conceptions, bureaucratic politics, group decision making and the impact of individual cognitive beliefs. Apart from in a small wave of studies in the 1970s (see the section above), these theories have barely been applied to decision making within international organizations. We believe that a renewed interest in using them is warranted, all the more so because some of the recent debates surrounding these theories echo the debates between rationalists and constructivists. For instance, students of bureaucratic politics discuss the limits of the simple notion that bureaucracies have an a priori interest in budget expansion and the possibilities of a theory that bureaucracies develop policy preferences on the basis of substantive and normative considerations (Welch 1998; Wcldcs 1998). Many of the contributions to this volume are informed by these middle-range theories. Most of them consist of single case studies. Only Schemcil, Woods and Dratwa (Chapters 4, 6 and 13) deal with two organizations. Middle-range theories applied in this volume arc garbage can theory (Joachim. Chapter 11), bureaucratic politics (Freitas, Chapter 7). two-level game (Kerremans, Chapter 2: Bayne, Chapter 8). role conflict theory (Trondal. Chapter 9), groupthink (Woods. Chapter 6). epistemic communities (Bayne. Chapter 8; Schemcil. Chapter 4) and the role of insti-tutions (Lovecy, Chapter 3; Ha/el/et, Chapter 10). Most contributors operate in the middle ground between constructivism and rationalism. They present their analysis against the background of the baseline of member states (principals) and international organizations (agents). We thus hope that this volume will demonstrate that a more pragmatic attitude towards current debates within the international relations discipline will improve the study of decision making within international organizations.That’s especially true of reforms vs reformism – our heuristic leaves open the possibility of contingent reforms that can solve major problems without universally committing to reformismHahnel ’5 We need look no further than to the history of twentieth century libertarian socialism to ====Throwing the baby of reform out with the bathwater of reformism teaches poor strategy==== It is important to remember, however, that rejecting reformism is not the same Contingent reforms, and not reformism, can be a toolkit item to solve a bevy of external impactsLiu ’12 A Crucible Moment likewise calls for transformations necessary for this AND, for high school graduates who may never enroll in college. The heuristic’s impact is enormous. It includes this room, but extends beyond it.Liu ’12 We therefore invite all stakeholders in America’s future to join together to become civic agents There are many ways to spin "civic engagement", but Liu confirms our read. It’s NOT ENOUGH FOR THEM TO WIN "STATE BAD", they also need to win "State Shunning" is the right strategy.Liu ’13 That certainly was the message of a recent interview and essay by the comedian Russell "State" or "Framework" indicts miss that we aren’t standard rational policy making. Heuristics teach both specific plans AND revise general problem-solving skills. Yes, the Neg has a heuristic – but our ev assumes policy heuristics and plausible Alts.Hendrick ’94 Newell and Simon (1972) were among the first scholars in the area of Even if "fiat’s not real", and Affs don’t control levers of power today, we advance a heuristic. Without this heuristic of fiat, we’ll re-enforce dangerous nihilism.Hoff ’6 There is no question that helping educational leadership students become self-analytical and reflect We’re not pro-State, but we’re "anti-anti State". Some things can ONLY be solved "through the system". Lifting existing POTUS authority is such an issue:Barbrook ’97 | 2/8/14 |
Hostilities 1AC - Texas 3Tournament: Texas | Round: 3 | Opponent: Georgetown ErMc | Judge: Katsulas All Else has already been posted; see Indiana 7Plan: The United States Federal Government should require Congressional authorization prior to initiating offensive use of military force, unless to repel attacks on the United States and enforce this restriction, among other measures, by creating a point of order mechanism and by requiring a formal policy trial modeled on impeachment proceedings prior to offensive use of military force. | 2/8/14 |
Hostilities 1AC - Texas 5Tournament: Texas | Round: 5 | Opponent: Houston LR | Judge: Abelkop, Adam Not re-posted: Check Hostilities 1AC UK RR 6Plan: The United States Federal Government should require legislative authorization prior to introducing the armed forces into combat. | 2/9/14 |
Hostilities 1AC - Texas DubsTournament: Texas | Round: Doubles | Opponent: Emory JS | Judge: Gramzinski, Arnett, Walters 1ACContention 1 —- WarfightingPower projection structurally fails because operations are guided by incoherent strategies disconnected from national political willGallagher 11 – Lieutenant Colonel Joseph V. Gallagher III, United States Marine Corps, "Unconstitutional War: Strategic Risk in the Age of Congressional Abdication", Parameters, Summer, http://strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/parameters/articles/2011summer/gallagher.pdf Understanding the Gap Since World War II, a wide gap has developed between Congress That crushes unit cohesion, morale, and allied support —- Congressional approval’s keyFrye 2 – Alton Frye, Presidential Senior Fellow Emeritus and Director of the Program on Congress and Foreign Policy at the Council on Foreign Relations, "Applying the War Powers Resolution to the War on Terrorism", Testimony Before the Senate Judiciary Committee, 4-17, http://www.cfr.org/terrorism/applying-war-powers-resolution-war-terrorism/p4514 4. CONSENSUS IS ESSENTIAL TO NATIONAL COHESION The case for active, continuing congressional Effective power projection stops hotspot escalation to nuclear warKagan 7 – Frederick Kagan, Resident Scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, and Michael O’Hanlon, Senior Fellow and Sydney Stein Jr. Chair in Foreign Policy Studies at the Brookings Institution, "The Case for Larger Ground Forces", Stanley Foundation Report, April, http://stanleyfoundation.org/publications/other/Kagan_OHanlon_07.pdf We live at a time when wars not only rage in nearly every region but This is statistically provenDrezner 5 – Daniel W. Drezner, Professor of International Politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University, Senior Editor at the National Interest, M.A. in Economics and Ph.D. in Political Science from Stanford University, "Gregg Easterbrook, War, and the Dangers of Extrapolation", 5-25, http://www.danieldrezner.com/archives/002087.html Via Oxblog’s Patrick Belton, I see that Gregg Easterbrook has a cover story in Executive war power ruins soft power and global alliancesSchiffer 9 – Adam Schiffer, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Political Science at Texas Christian University, and Carrie Liu Currier, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Political Science at Texas Christian University, "War Powers, International Alliances, the President, and Congress", http://apcentral.collegeboard.com/apc/public/repository/US_Gov_Balance_of_Power_SF.pdf The president’s advantages over Congress in the foreign policy realm have consequences far beyond the Restraining use of force builds democratic cooperation that prevents and mitigates food shortagesIkenberry 11 – G. John Ikenberry, Peter F. Krogh Professor of Global Justice at the School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University, "A World of Our Making", Democracy: A Journal of Ideas, Issue ~2321, Summer, http://www.democracyjournal.org/21/a-world-of-our-making-1.php?page=all Grand Strategy as Liberal Order Building American dominance of the global system will eventually yield Food shortages kill billionsBrown 5 Many Americans see terrorism as the principal threat to security, but for much of Contention 2 —- SOPUnchecked war power sets a precedent that causes the executive to broadly ignore Congressional controlsBarron 8 – David J. Barron, Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and Martin S. Lederman, Visiting Professor of Law at the Georgetown University Law Center, "The Commander in Chief at the Lowest Ebb — A Constitutional History", Harvard Law Review, February, 121 Harv. L. Rev. 941, Lexis Thus, as future administrations contemplate the extent of their own discretion at the " U.S. war powers are modeled internationally —- precedent of executive authority encourages preemptive conflict in worldwide, especially in KoreaSloane 8 – Sloane, Associate Professor of Law, Boston University School of Law, 2008 (Robert, Boston University Law Review, April, 88 B.U.L. Rev. 341, Lexis) There is a great deal more constitutional history that arguably bears on the scope of Preemption escalates regional conflicts—-global nuclear warObayemi, 6 — East Bay Law School professor The United States must abide by the rigorous standards set out above that are meant Korea risk’s high —- no restraintBlair 13 – David Blair, Chief Foreign Correspondent and Former Diplomatic Editor at The Daily Telegraph, National Post Wire Services, M.Phil in International Relations from Cambridge University, 2012 Foreign Reporter of the Year – The Press Awards, "A Small Incident Could Quickly Escalate into a Korean War That No Side Wants", National Post, 4-5, http://news.nationalpost.com/2013/04/05/a-small-incident-could-quickly-escalate-into-a-korean-war-that-no-side-wants/ Despite everything, this crisis will almost certainly not peak with North Korea deciding to Korea escalates —- model of preemption bypasses their defensePulcifer 3 – Ash Pulcifer, U.S. Based Analyst of International Conflicts and Human Rights Activist at the Information Clearing House, "The Dangers Caused By A Policy Of Preemption", 3-1, http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article1722.htm Furthermore, North Korea jabbed the sword even deeper into the heart of White House Contention 3—-SudanU.S. is intervening in Sudan—-escalates conflict to regional war and bogs down the U.S.Azikiwe 12-25 – Abayomi Azikiwe, Editor of Pan-African News Wire, "US Shot Itself in the Foot in Sudan", RT, 2013, http://rt.com/op-edge/foreign-involvement-in-south-sudan-782/ Washington was more interested in weakening the Republic in Sudan and encouraged the Republic of More’s coming, based on unitary war power authorityUPI 12-22 – United Press International, "Obama Tells Congress He ’May Take Further Action’ In South Sudan", 2013, http://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-News/2013/12/22/Obama-tells-Congress-he-may-take-further-action-in-South-Sudan/UPI-76161387729572/ U.S. President Barack Obama told Congress Sunday he "may take further Escalation causes displacement—-results in hundreds of thousands of landmine deathsMoore 14 – Michael P. Moore, Landmine Survivors Network, "Landmines and the Crisis in South Sudan", Landmines in Africa, 1-27, http://landminesinafrica.wordpress.com/2014/01/27/landmines-and-the-crisis-in-south-sudan/ A month later, South Sudan was the newest country in the world. Since Theoretical critique can’t resolve this impactPettiford ’98 The basic argument put forward is that whilst the security debate within¶ international relations Also causes global conflict—-draws in great powersGlick 7 (Caroline, Senior Middle East Fellow – Center for Security Policy, "Condi’s African Holiday", 12-12, http://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/home.aspx?sid=5626categoryid=5626subcategoryid=9026newsid=11568) US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice introduced a new venue for her superficial and destructive Sudan conflict closes the Suez CanalPelfrey 10 – Christian Pelfrey, Pulitzer Center William and Mary Summer Security Fellow, "In Focus: Sudan - Why Should We Care?", 7-6, http://pulitzercenter.org/blog/news-points/focus-sudan-why-should-we-care Here are three reasons Sudan is important to the world of international security: Oil Sparks nuclear warNazemroaya 11 (Mahdi Darius, Research Associate – Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG), "The Division of Egypt: Threats of US, Israeli, and NATO Military Intervention?", 2-13, http://www.setyoufreenews.com/2011/02/division-of-egypt-threats-of-us-israeli.html) Recall the 1956 Invasion of Egypt? There is also the chance of renewed war Plan keeps the U.S. outHanania 12 – Richard Hanania, JD Candidate at the University of Chicago Law School and Writer at The Atlantic, "Humanitarian Intervention and the War Powers Debate", The Journal Jurisprudence, (2012) J. JURIS 47, http://www.jurisprudence.com.au/juris13/Hanania.pdf What we see is a public that is generally indifferent to foreign affairs, but Legal restraints meaningfully check the PresidentCole ’12 Rana’s account of the epistemological underpinnings of the national security state offers an astute and Requiring prior Congressional authorization for war deters adventurismBacevich 13 – Andrew, Professor of History and International Relations at Boston University and Ph.D. in American Diplomatic History from Princeton University, The New American Militarism, p. 205-210 There is, wrote H. L. Mencken, "always a well- The process makes conflict less likely, regardless of Congress’ responseGrynaviski 13 – Eric Grynaviski, Professor of Political Science at The George Washington University, "The Bloodstained Spear: Public Reason and Declarations of War", International Theory, 5(2), Cambridge Journals Conclusion The burden of the argument, thus far, has been to show that Plan –The United States Federal Government should require a Congressional policy trial prior to introducing United States Armed Forces into armed combat, unless to repel attacks.Plan’s the perfect balance that checks the Executive but preserves defensive capabilitiesLobel 8 – Jules Lobel, Professor at University of Pittsburgh Law School, "War Powers for the 21st Century: The Constitutional Perspective", Testimony Before the Subcommittee on International Organizations, Human Rights and Oversight Committee on Foreign Affairs U.S. House of Representatives, 4-10, http://democrats.foreignaffairs.house.gov/110/lob041008.htm III Revising the War Powers Resolution I believe that it is necessary and possible to Obama will complyBarron 8 – David J. Barron, Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and Martin S. Lederman, Visiting Professor of Law at the Georgetown University Law Center, "The Commander in Chief at the Lowest Ebb — A Constitutional History", Harvard Law Review, February, 121 Harv. L. Rev. 941, Lexis In addition to offering important guidance concerning the congressional role, our historical review also Ex ante policy trials avoid circumventionBuchanan 8 – Bruce Buchanan, Professor of Government at the University of Texas at Austin, "Presidential Accountability for Wars of Choice", Issues in Governance Studies, Number 22, December, http://www.brookings.edu/~~/media/research/files/papers/2008/12/3020war20buchanan/1230_war_buchanan.pdf Implications These cases of Korea, Vietnam and Iraq display regrettable patterns of ill- Flexibility link’s a lieStreichler 8 – Stuart Streichler, Adjunct Faculty at Seattle University School of Law. Ph.D. at Johns Hopkins University; J.D. at the University of Michigan Law School; B.S. at Bowling Green State University, "Mad about Yoo, or Why Worry about the Next Unconstitutional War", The Journal of Law 26 Politics, Winter, 24 J. L. 26 Politics 93, Lexis When Yoo discusses the need for flexibility in the process for warmaking, he creates "Particularity Good" Thesis. Standard Epistemology and Reps frameworks lack particular nuance – makes decisions and scholarship worse.Smith ’6 In a related way, Dancy seeks to undermine certain ’coercive’ (Dancy 1993: | 2/10/14 |
Hostilities 1AC - UK RR 4Tournament: UK RR | Round: 4 | Opponent: Kentucky GR | Judge: Green, Justin Contention 1 —- InterventionCongress has abdicated war powers, leaving no check on unitary executive war-makingPinhiero 11 – John C. Pinhiero, Associate Professor of History at Aquinas College, ""Hostilities" and War Powers: Let’s Choose the Constitution", History News Service, 6-29, http://historynewsservice.org/2011/06/hostilities-and-war-powers-lets-choose-the-constitution/ Last week Rep. Jerrold Nadler of New York warned that "if we don’t Executive war power structurally ensures groupthink and escalatory interventionsFleischman 10 – Matthew Fleischman, J.D. Candidate at New York University School of Law, "A Functional Distribution of War Powers", New York University Journal of Legislation and Public Policy, 13 N.Y.U. J. Legis. 26 Pub. Pol’y 137, Lexis While Nzelibe and Yoo’s model is clearly plausible, it misses certain critical institutional constructs Those go nuclear —-Accidents and miscalcAdler 8 – David Gray, Professor of Political Science at Idaho State University, "The Judiciary and Presidential Power in Foreign Affairs: A Critique", 6-1, http://www.freerangethought.com/index.php?option=com_content26task=blogsection26id=626Itemid=41 ~{11~} The structure of shared powers in foreign relations serves to deter abuse High tempo interventions draw in outside powersFriedman 11 – George Friedman, President of Stratfor Global Forecasting, "What Happened to the American Declaration of War?", Stratfor, 3-29, http://www.stratfor.com/weekly/20110328-what-happened-american-declaration-war An Increasing Tempo of Operations All of this came just before the United States emerged Requiring prior Congressional authorization for war deters adventurismBacevich 13 – Andrew, Professor of History and International Relations at Boston University and Ph.D. in American Diplomatic History from Princeton University, The New American Militarism, p. 205-210 There is, wrote H. L. Mencken, "always a well- The process makes conflict less likely, regardless of Congress’ responseGrynaviski 13 – Eric Grynaviski, Professor of Political Science at The George Washington University, "The Bloodstained Spear: Public Reason and Declarations of War", International Theory, 5(2), Cambridge Journals Conclusion The burden of the argument, thus far, has been to show that Contention 2 —- WarfightingPower projection structurally fails because operations are guided by incoherent strategies disconnected from national political willGallagher 11 – Lieutenant Colonel Joseph V. Gallagher III, United States Marine Corps, "Unconstitutional War: Strategic Risk in the Age of Congressional Abdication", Parameters, Summer, http://strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/parameters/articles/2011summer/gallagher.pdf Understanding the Gap Since World War II, a wide gap has developed between Congress That crushes unit cohesion, morale, and allied support —- Congressional approval’s keyFrye 2 – Alton Frye, Presidential Senior Fellow Emeritus and Director of the Program on Congress and Foreign Policy at the Council on Foreign Relations, "Applying the War Powers Resolution to the War on Terrorism", Testimony Before the Senate Judiciary Committee, 4-17, http://www.cfr.org/terrorism/applying-war-powers-resolution-war-terrorism/p4514 4. CONSENSUS IS ESSENTIAL TO NATIONAL COHESION The case for active, continuing congressional Effective power projection stops hotspot escalation to nuclear warKagan 7 – Frederick Kagan, Resident Scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, and Michael O’Hanlon, Senior Fellow and Sydney Stein Jr. Chair in Foreign Policy Studies at the Brookings Institution, "The Case for Larger Ground Forces", Stanley Foundation Report, April, http://stanleyfoundation.org/publications/other/Kagan_OHanlon_07.pdf We live at a time when wars not only rage in nearly every region but This is statistically provenDrezner 5 – Daniel W. Drezner, Professor of International Politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University, Senior Editor at the National Interest, M.A. in Economics and Ph.D. in Political Science from Stanford University, "Gregg Easterbrook, War, and the Dangers of Extrapolation", 5-25, http://www.danieldrezner.com/archives/002087.html Via Oxblog’s Patrick Belton, I see that Gregg Easterbrook has a cover story in Executive war power ruins soft power and global alliancesSchiffer 9 – Adam Schiffer, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Political Science at Texas Christian University, and Carrie Liu Currier, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Political Science at Texas Christian University, "War Powers, International Alliances, the President, and Congress", http://apcentral.collegeboard.com/apc/public/repository/US_Gov_Balance_of_Power_SF.pdf The president’s advantages over Congress in the foreign policy realm have consequences far beyond the Restraining use of force builds democratic cooperation that prevents and mitigates food shortagesIkenberry 11 – G. John Ikenberry, Peter F. Krogh Professor of Global Justice at the School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University, "A World of Our Making", Democracy: A Journal of Ideas, Issue ~2321, Summer, http://www.democracyjournal.org/21/a-world-of-our-making-1.php?page=all-http://www.democracyjournal.org/21/a-world-of-our-making-1.php?page=all Grand Strategy as Liberal Order Building American dominance of the global system will eventually yield Food shortages kill billionsBrown 5 Many Americans see terrorism as the principal threat to security, but for much of Contention 3 —- SOPUnchecked war power sets a precedent that causes the executive to broadly ignore Congressional controlsBarron 8 – David J. Barron, Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and Martin S. Lederman, Visiting Professor of Law at the Georgetown University Law Center, "The Commander in Chief at the Lowest Ebb — A Constitutional History", Harvard Law Review, February, 121 Harv. L. Rev. 941, Lexis Thus, as future administrations contemplate the extent of their own discretion at the " U.S. war powers are modeled internationally —- the precedent of unilateral executive authority encourages preemptive conflict in multiple hotspotsSloane 8 – Sloane, Associate Professor of Law, Boston University School of Law, 2008 (Robert, Boston University Law Review, April, 88 B.U.L. Rev. 341, Lexis) There is a great deal more constitutional history that arguably bears on the scope of Preemption wrecks US/EU relations—-prevents effective cooperation on health and the environmentSykes 12 – David Sykes, Nottingham Trent University, "An Evaluation of Neoconservative Foreign Policy", e-International Relations, 4-1, http://www.e-ir.info/2012/04/01/an-evaluation-of-neoconservative-foreign-policy/ In the light of the attacks of 9/11, the neoconservatives believed that Relations are vital to solve global environmental threatsSteinberg 3 – James B. Steinberg, Vice President and Director of Foreign Policy Studies, Brookings Institution, Summer 2003 ("An Elective Partnership: Salvaging Transatlantic Relations" – Survival) p. OUP Journals Yet, the objective realities of environmental risk inevitably will force both the United States ExtinctionMittermeier ’11 Extinction is the gravest consequence of the biodiversity crisis, since it is¶ irreversible Only formal checks signal restraintDamrosch 97 – Lori Fisler Damrosch, Professor of Law at the Columbia University School of Law, "Use of Force and Constitutionalism", Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 36 Colum. J. Transnat’l L. 449, Lexis Structural-institutional explanations, on the other hand, point to features of liberal Plan –The United States Federal Government should preclude the use of offensive military force without prior Congressional authorization, unless to repel attacks on the United States.Plan’s the perfect balance that checks the Executive but preserves defensive capabilitiesLobel 8 – Jules Lobel, Professor at University of Pittsburgh Law School, "War Powers for the 21st Century: The Constitutional Perspective", Testimony Before the Subcommittee on International Organizations, Human Rights and Oversight Committee on Foreign Affairs U.S. House of Representatives, 4-10, http://democrats.foreignaffairs.house.gov/110/lob041008.htm III Revising the War Powers Resolution I believe that it is necessary and possible to Obama will complyBarron 8 – David J. Barron, Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and Martin S. Lederman, Visiting Professor of Law at the Georgetown University Law Center, "The Commander in Chief at the Lowest Ebb — A Constitutional History", Harvard Law Review, February, 121 Harv. L. Rev. 941, Lexis In addition to offering important guidance concerning the congressional role, our historical review also Plan overcomes barriers to enforcementLobel 9 – Jules Lobel, Professor of Law at the University of Pittsburgh. "Restore. Protect. Expand. Amend the War Powers Resolution". Center for Constitutional Rights White Paper, http://ccrjustice.org files CCR_White_WarPowers.pdf The War Powers Resolution should explicitly prohibit executive acts of war without previous Congressional authorization | 10/4/13 |
Hostilities 1AC - UK RR 6Tournament: UK RR | Round: 6 | Opponent: Emory JS | Judge: Russell Contention 1 —- R2PU.S. is pushing a norm of Responsibility to Protect —- alienates Russia and China and risks global great power conflictTrombly 11 – Dan Trombly, Ph.D Candidate in International Relations at George Washington University, "The Upending of Sovereignty", 8-27, http://slouchingcolumbia.wordpress.com/2011/08/27/the-upending-of-sovereignty/ The other, truly potent danger of this new set of norms is that it Threat of R2P ruins global cooperation necessary to stop famine, disease, and multiple flashpoints for warTrombly 11 – Dan Trombly, Ph.D. Candidate in International Affairs at George Washington University, "Responsibility to Protect Ya Neck", 9-3, http://fearhonorinterest.wordpress.com/2011/09/03/responsibility-to-protect-ya-neck/ Advocates should recognize that the world is more peaceful now than it has ever been Famine kills billionsBrown 5 Many Americans see terrorism as the principal threat to security, but for much of Plan stops U.S. implementation of R2P —- Presidents support it, but Congressional control blocksHanania 12 – Richard Hanania, JD Candidate at the University of Chicago Law School and Writer at The Atlantic, "Humanitarian Intervention and the War Powers Debate", The Journal Jurisprudence, (2012) J. JURIS 47, http://www.jurisprudence.com.au/juris13/Hanania.pdf What we see is a public that is generally indifferent to foreign affairs, but Legal restraints meaningfully check the PresidentCole ’12 Rana’s account of the epistemological underpinnings of the national security state offers an astute and Requiring prior Congressional authorization for war deters adventurismBacevich 13 – Andrew, Professor of History and International Relations at Boston University and Ph.D. in American Diplomatic History from Princeton University, The New American Militarism, p. 205-210 There is, wrote H. L. Mencken, "always a well- The process makes conflict less likely, regardless of Congress’ responseGrynaviski 13 – Eric Grynaviski, Professor of Political Science at The George Washington University, "The Bloodstained Spear: Public Reason and Declarations of War", International Theory, 5(2), Cambridge Journals Conclusion The burden of the argument, thus far, has been to show that Contention 2 —- WarfightingPower projection structurally fails because operations are guided by incoherent strategies disconnected from national political willGallagher 11 – Lieutenant Colonel Joseph V. Gallagher III, United States Marine Corps, "Unconstitutional War: Strategic Risk in the Age of Congressional Abdication", Parameters, Summer, http://strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/parameters/articles/2011summer/gallagher.pdf Understanding the Gap Since World War II, a wide gap has developed between Congress That crushes unit cohesion, morale, and allied support —- Congressional approval’s keyFrye 2 – Alton Frye, Presidential Senior Fellow Emeritus and Director of the Program on Congress and Foreign Policy at the Council on Foreign Relations, "Applying the War Powers Resolution to the War on Terrorism", Testimony Before the Senate Judiciary Committee, 4-17, http://www.cfr.org/terrorism/applying-war-powers-resolution-war-terrorism/p4514 Effective power projection stops hotspot escalation to nuclear warKagan 7 – Frederick Kagan, Resident Scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, and Michael O’Hanlon, Senior Fellow and Sydney Stein Jr. Chair in Foreign Policy Studies at the Brookings Institution, "The Case for Larger Ground Forces", Stanley Foundation Report, April, http://stanleyfoundation.org/publications/other/Kagan_OHanlon_07.pdf We live at a time when wars not only rage in nearly every region but This is statistically provenDrezner 5 – Daniel W. Drezner, Professor of International Politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University, Senior Editor at the National Interest, M.A. in Economics and Ph.D. in Political Science from Stanford University, "Gregg Easterbrook, War, and the Dangers of Extrapolation", 5-25, http://www.danieldrezner.com/archives/002087.html Via Oxblog’s Patrick Belton, I see that Gregg Easterbrook has a cover story in Executive war power ruins soft power and global alliancesSchiffer 9 – Adam Schiffer, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Political Science at Texas Christian University, and Carrie Liu Currier, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Political Science at Texas Christian University, "War Powers, International Alliances, the President, and Congress", http://apcentral.collegeboard.com/apc/public/repository/US_Gov_Balance_of_Power_SF.pdf The president’s advantages over Congress in the foreign policy realm have consequences far beyond the Restraining use of force builds democratic cooperation that prevents and mitigates mass migrationIkenberry 11 – G. John Ikenberry, Peter F. Krogh Professor of Global Justice at the School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University, "A World of Our Making", Democracy: A Journal of Ideas, Issue ~2321, Summer, http://www.democracyjournal.org/21/a-world-of-our-making-1.php?page=all-http://www.democracyjournal.org/21/a-world-of-our-making-1.php?page=all Grand Strategy as Liberal Order Building American dominance of the global system will eventually yield Migration’s likely—-causes conflict that escalatesTay 10 (Simon, and Phir Paungmalit, Professors – Singapore Institute of International Affairs, "Climate Change and Security In the Asia-Pacific", 3-26, http://www.siiaonline.org/files/2010_Paper_SimonTay+Phir_ClimateChange+HumanSecurity.pdf) Environmentally induced displacement and migration are already taking place, and because of the impacts Contention 3 —- SOPUnchecked war power sets a precedent that causes the executive to broadly ignore Congressional controlsBarron 8 – David J. Barron, Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and Martin S. Lederman, Visiting Professor of Law at the Georgetown University Law Center, "The Commander in Chief at the Lowest Ebb — A Constitutional History", Harvard Law Review, February, 121 Harv. L. Rev. 941, Lexis Thus, as future administrations contemplate the extent of their own discretion at the " U.S. war powers are modeled internationally —- precedent of executive authority encourages preemptive conflict in RussiaSloane 8 – Sloane, Associate Professor of Law, Boston University School of Law, 2008 (Robert, Boston University Law Review, April, 88 B.U.L. Rev. 341, Lexis) There is a great deal more constitutional history that arguably bears on the scope of Russia models U.S. preemption —- risks conflict in ChechnyaArvizu 4 – Ruben Arvizu, Director for Latin America of the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, "The Domino Effect: Preemptive Wars on the Rise", September, http://www.wagingpeace.org/articles/2004/09/00_arvizu_domino-effect.htm When the Bush administration initiated the invasion of Iraq arguing that preemptive war was a EscalatesGarb 98 (Paula, Associate Director of International Studies and Professor of Anthropology – University of California, Irvine, The International Spread of Ethnic Conflict: Fear, Diffusion, and Escalation, Ed. Lake and Rothchild, p. 186) When Russia finally launched a military assault on Chechnya, Fiona Hill (1995, Conflict’s likely —- new Russian doctrine makes preemptive military action throughout Central AsiaBlank 10 – Stephen Blank, Ph.D. and Professor at the Strategic Studies Institute of the US Army War College, "The Real Reset: Moscow Refights the Cold War", World Affairs, September / October, http://www.worldaffairsjournal.org/article/real-reset-moscow-refights-cold-war Pressing the reset button has hardly led to any progress to date on the outstanding Escalates —- high probility of nuclear conflictBlank 99 (Steven, Professor of Research – Strategic Studies Institute, US Army War College, Oil and Geopolitics in the Caspian Region) Past experience suggests Moscow will even threaten a Third World War if there is Turkish Threat’s real—-cognitive biases downplay the Russian threatBlank 5 – Stephen Blank, Professor at the Strategic Studies Institute at the U.S. Army War College, "Is Russia a Democracy and Does It Matter?", World Affairs, 167(3), Winter, Jstor Recently, several analysts have argued that Russia is "a normal country" just Prefer specificity of our contingent truth claimsPRICE ’98 One of the central departures of critical international theory from positivism is the view that PlanThe United States Federal Government should require legislative authorization prior to initiating military use of force, unless to repel attacks on the United States.Plan’s the perfect balance that checks the Executive but preserves defensive capabilitiesLobel 8 – Jules Lobel, Professor at University of Pittsburgh Law School, "War Powers for the 21st Century: The Constitutional Perspective", Testimony Before the Subcommittee on International Organizations, Human Rights and Oversight Committee on Foreign Affairs U.S. House of Representatives, 4-10, http://democrats.foreignaffairs.house.gov/110/lob041008.htm III Revising the War Powers Resolution I believe that it is necessary and possible to Flexibility and speed turns are totally wrongStreichler 8 – Stuart Streichler, Adjunct Faculty at Seattle University School of Law. Ph.D. at Johns Hopkins University; J.D. at the University of Michigan Law School; B.S. at Bowling Green State University, "Mad about Yoo, or Why Worry about the Next Unconstitutional War", The Journal of Law 26 Politics, Winter, 24 J. L. 26 Politics 93, Lexis When Yoo discusses the need for flexibility in the process for warmaking, he creates Plan overcomes barriers to enforcementLobel 9 – Jules Lobel, Professor of Law at the University of Pittsburgh. "Restore. Protect. Expand. Amend the War Powers Resolution". Center for Constitutional Rights White Paper, http://ccrjustice.org files CCR_White_WarPowers.pdf The War Powers Resolution should explicitly prohibit executive acts of war without previous Congressional authorization Lack of prior participation causes interference in duration and conduct of warBarron 8 – David J. Barron, Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and Martin S. Lederman, Visiting Professor of Law at the Georgetown University Law Center, "The Commander in Chief at the Lowest Ebb — A Constitutional History", Harvard Law Review, February, 121 Harv. L. Rev. 941, Lexis By the conclusion of the Clinton Administration, however, it appeared that something of | 10/4/13 |
Hostilities 1AC - UK RR 8Tournament: UK RR | Round: 8 | Opponent: Oklahoma LM | Judge: Hall, Sherry Contention 1 – MiscalculationCongress has abdicated war powers, leaving no check on unitary executive war-makingPinhiero 11 – John C. Pinhiero, Associate Professor of History at Aquinas College, ""Hostilities" and War Powers: Let’s Choose the Constitution", History News Service, 6-29, http://historynewsservice.org/2011/06/hostilities-and-war-powers-lets-choose-the-constitution/ Last week Rep. Jerrold Nadler of New York warned that "if we don’t Executive war power structurally ensures groupthink and miscalc While Nzelibe and Yoo’s model is clearly plausible, it misses certain critical institutional constructs Groupthink makes miscalc inevitable – impact’s is large death tolls.Adler 8 – David Gray, Professor of Political Science at Idaho State University, "The Judiciary and Presidential Power in Foreign Affairs: A Critique", 6-1, http://www.freerangethought.com/index.php?option=com_content26task=blogsection26id=626Itemid=41 ~{11~} The structure of shared powers in foreign relations serves to deter abuse Institutional checks effectively limit war and are a prerequisite to broader social changeGrynaviski 13 – Eric Grynaviski, Professor of Political Science at The George Washington University, "The Bloodstained Spear: Public Reason and Declarations of War", International Theory, 5(2), Cambridge Journals Conclusion The burden of the argument, thus far, has been to show that Congress will regulate – no rubberstampingMcManus 13 – Doyle McManus, Washington Bureau Chief of the Los Angeles Times, MA and Fullbright Scholar at the University of Brussels, Four-Time Winner of the National Press Club’s Edwin Hood Award for Reporting on U.S. Foreign Policy, Winner of Georgetown University’s Weintal Prize, "In America, Not Isolationism But Skepticism", Los Angeles Times, 9-15, http://www.latimes.com/opinion/commentary/la-oe-mcmanus-column-congress-obama-and-syria-20130915,0,3944454.column Opposition in Congress to a presidential request to use force has a long history. Obama will complyBarron 8 – David J. Barron, Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and Martin S. Lederman, Visiting Professor of Law at the Georgetown University Law Center, "The Commander in Chief at the Lowest Ebb — A Constitutional History", Harvard Law Review, February, 121 Harv. L. Rev. 941, Lexis In addition to offering important guidance concerning the congressional role, our historical review also Plan overcomes barriers to enforcementLobel 9 – Jules Lobel, Professor of Law at the University of Pittsburgh. "Restore. Protect. Expand. Amend the War Powers Resolution". Center for Constitutional Rights White Paper, http://ccrjustice.org files CCR_White_WarPowers.pdf The War Powers Resolution should explicitly prohibit executive acts of war without previous Congressional authorization Switch-side simulation of nuclear policies is key to informed deliberation on nuclear issuesShaw 9 "The one thing we know about policy windows is that, as sure as Bush Doctrine 1ACContention 2 – the Bush DoctrineUnchecked war power sets a precedent that causes the executive to broadly ignore Congressional controlsBarron 8 – David J. Barron, Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and Martin S. Lederman, Visiting Professor of Law at the Georgetown University Law Center, "The Commander in Chief at the Lowest Ebb — A Constitutional History", Harvard Law Review, February, 121 Harv. L. Rev. 941, Lexis Thus, as future administrations contemplate the extent of their own discretion at the " Only the plan ends the Bush DoctrineBacevich 7 Bush Doctrine is hampering US-India relations – revoking it is key to space coopSidhu 10 While the political system is a limiting factor in improving relations, this is not Relations solve asteroid deflection – a strike is likely and bad.Bagla 13 Saving humanity from a mega-asteroid strike could be the next big effort in Cosmic cycle makes asteroid impacts likelyMcKinney 10 – Luke McKinney, PhD candidate in Physics at the University of Toronto, B.Sc, M.Sc in Experimental and Mathematical Physics from the University College Dublin, "A Deadly Orbit? -The Solar System’s Journey Through the Milky Way", Daily Galaxy, 2-11, http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2010/02/a-deadly-orbit-the-solar-systems-journey-through-the-milky-way.html Is there a genocidal countdown built into the motion of our solar system? Recent Comparatively outweighs – billions of deaths.McGuire 2 – Bill, Professor of Geohazards at the University College London and One of Britain’s Leading Volcanologists, A Guide to the End of the World, p. 173-174 Probably the only piece of good news that can be taken away from my brief Space impacts require specific technical expertise to disprove —- theoretical critique means nothingYudkowsky 8 – Eliezer, Research Fellow and Director of the Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence, "Cognitive Biases Potentially Affecting Judgment of Global Risks", Global Catastrophic Risks, p. Google Books Every true idea which discomforts you will seem to match the pattern of at least Technology K is wrong – too sweeping and denies human agencyJones ’99 In the previous chapters I outlined two diametrically opposed views on the nature of technology Simulating space policy spurs action, critical thinking, and stops elite techno-scienceKaminski 12 – Amy Paige Kaminski, Senior Policy Advisor to the Chief Scientist at NASA Headquarters and Ph.D. Candidate in Science and Technology Studies at Virginia Tech, "Can the Demos Make a Difference? Prospects for Participatory Democracy in Shaping the Future Course of US Space Exploration", Space Policy, 28(4), November, p. 227-229 Critics of such inclusiveness might contend that lay citizens, lacking techno-scientific expertise Independently, US-India ties are key to the Agricultural Knowledge InitiativeFeigenbaum 9 And so it’s entirely fitting that the United States and India begin to talk about That’s crucial to diversify wheat germ resistance – uses Borlaug’s approachBhonsle 7 The U.S. has undertaken to launch a Rs. 1000 crore Agriculture That’s key to checking wheat fungi without using fungicideMarius 8 After the 1954 epidemic, ~Norman~ Borlaug began work in Mexico on developing UG99 will reach India – prep time keyWalker 10 But Ug99 defeats them. The red pustules it produces on wheat stems can burst Will hit India and place a billion at risk – only Borlaug’s approach solvesHildebrant 7 Ug99 isn’t a typo the proofreader missed, instead it’s the designation given a new PlanThe United States Congress should require legislative authorization prior to initiating offensive use of military force, unless to repel attacks on the United States.UnderviewForgive labels. Yes, the Neg’s K is "political" in some sense. But, NOT "political" as our authors discuss. Broadening "politics" beyond macro-State is a word-game that’s worse for curriculum. It veers from the nexus ? of concrete altsChandler ’7 K’s have a "micro-political" starting point that gets trapped. The sequence never bubbles-up to the macro. This makes us worse activists with worse altsChandler ’7 Particularity Good. Sweeping K doesn’t prove specific rejoinder – makes decisions and scholarship worse.Smith 6 In a related way, Dancy seeks to undermine certain ’coercive’ (Dancy 1993: Even if "fiat is not real", and the Aff does not control levers of power today, we avoid a curriculum that teaches the most dangerous nihilism.Hoff ’6 There is no question that helping educational leadership students become self-analytical and reflect And, if the debate winds-up a "tie", presumption should shift in favor of change – best avoids nihilism.Reception-theory proves reps don’t "create reality". Audiences are smart and reach their own conclusions.Kraus 89 Edelman assumes (like the early Frankfurt School) that viewers/audi- tors | 10/4/13 |
Hostilities 1AC - UK RR Round 2Tournament: UK RR | Round: 2 | Opponent: Michigan AP | Judge: Hardy Contention 1 —- InterventionCongress has abdicated war powers, leaving no check on unitary executive war-makingPinhiero 11 – John C. Pinhiero, Associate Professor of History at Aquinas College, and#34;and#34;Hostilitiesand#34; and War Powers: Let’s Choose the Constitutionand#34;, History News Service, 6-29, http://historynewsservice.org/2011/06/hostilities-and-war-powers-lets-choose-the-constitution/ Last week Rep. Jerrold Nadler of New York warned that and#34;if we don’t Executive war power structurally ensures groupthink and escalatory interventionsFleischman 10 – Matthew Fleischman, J.D. Candidate at New York University School of Law, and#34;A Functional Distribution of War Powersand#34;, New York University Journal of Legislation and Public Policy, 13 N.Y.U. J. Legis. 26 Pub. Pol’y 137, Lexis While Nzelibe and Yoo’s model is clearly plausible, it misses certain critical institutional constructs Those go nuclear —-Accidents and miscalcAdler 8 – David Gray, Professor of Political Science at Idaho State University, and#34;The Judiciary and Presidential Power in Foreign Affairs: A Critiqueand#34;, 6-1, http://www.freerangethought.com/index.php?option=com_content26task=blogsection26id=626Itemid=41 ~and#123;11~} The structure of shared powers in foreign relations serves to deter abuse Terrorist spoofingBlumrosen 11 – Alfred W. Blumrosen, Professor Emeritus at the Rutgers School of Law and Steven M. Blumrosen, J.D., Quinnipiac University School of Law, and#34;Restoring the Congressional Duty to Declare Warand#34;, Rutgers Law Review, Winter, 63 Rutgers L. Rev. 407, Lexis Conclusion We have placed a heavy burden on June 1-4, 1787 to High tempo interventions draw in outside powersFriedman 11 – George Friedman, President of Stratfor Global Forecasting, and#34;What Happened to the American Declaration of War?and#34;, Stratfor, 3-29, http://www.stratfor.com/weekly/20110328-what-happened-american-declaration-war An Increasing Tempo of Operations All of this came just before the United States emerged Requiring prior Congressional authorization for war deters adventurismDickerson 9 – Annette Warren Dickerson, Director of Education 26 Outreach for the Center for Constitutional Rights, and#34;Restore. Protect. Expand. Amend the War Powers Resolutionand#34;, Center for Constitutional Rights White Paper, http://ccrjustice.org/files/CCR_White_WarPowers.pdf Reform the War Powers Resolution The War Powers Resolution has failed. Every president since Contention 2 —- WarfightingPower projection structurally fails because operations are guided by incoherent strategies disconnected from national political willGallagher 11 – Lieutenant Colonel Joseph V. Gallagher III, United States Marine Corps, and#34;Unconstitutional War: Strategic Risk in the Age of Congressional Abdicationand#34;, Parameters, Summer, http://strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/parameters/articles/2011summer/gallagher.pdf Understanding the Gap Since World War II, a wide gap has developed between Congress Libya removed all remaining checks on unilateral executive war-making —- ruins accountability and signal of unified resolveWebb 13 – Jim Webb, Former U.S. Senator from Virginia and Secretary of the Navy in the Reagan Administration, and#34;Congressional Abdicationand#34;, The National Interest, 3-1, http://nationalinterest.org/article/congressional-abdication-8138?page=show The president followed no clear historical standard when he unilaterally decided to use force in That crushes unit cohesion, morale, and allied support —- Congressional approval’s keyFrye 2 – Alton Frye, Presidential Senior Fellow Emeritus and Director of the Program on Congress and Foreign Policy at the Council on Foreign Relations, and#34;Applying the War Powers Resolution to the War on Terrorismand#34;, Testimony Before the Senate Judiciary Committee, 4-17, http://www.cfr.org/terrorism/applying-war-powers-resolution-war-terrorism/p4514 4. CONSENSUS IS ESSENTIAL TO NATIONAL COHESION The case for active, continuing congressional Plan boosts credible negotiating power by locking in public and Congressional support prior to conflictGelb 5 – Leslie H. Gelb, President Emeritus of the Council on Foreign Relations and Anne-Marie Slaughter, Dean of the Woodrow Wilson School of International and Public Affairs, and#34;Declare Warand#34;, The Atlantic, 11-1, http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2005/11/declare-war/304301/?single_page=true-http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2005/11/declare-war/304301/?single_page=true In the wake of the Vietnam War, Congress tried to fix this problem by Effective power projection stops hotspot escalation to nuclear warKagan 7 – Frederick Kagan, Resident Scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, and Michael O’Hanlon, Senior Fellow and Sydney Stein Jr. Chair in Foreign Policy Studies at the Brookings Institution, and#34;The Case for Larger Ground Forcesand#34;, Stanley Foundation Report, April, http://stanleyfoundation.org/publications/other/Kagan_OHanlon_07.pdf We live at a time when wars not only rage in nearly every region but Executive war power ruins soft power and global alliancesSchiffer 9 – Adam Schiffer, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Political Science at Texas Christian University, and Carrie Liu Currier, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Political Science at Texas Christian University, and#34;War Powers, International Alliances, the President, and Congressand#34;, http://apcentral.collegeboard.com/apc/public/repository/US_Gov_Balance_of_Power_SF.pdf The president’s advantages over Congress in the foreign policy realm have consequences far beyond the Grounding use of force in constitutionally-based SOP creates a perception of benign hegemony and encourages international cooperation based on rule of lawIkenberry 1 – G. John, Peter F. Krogh Professor of Global Justice at the School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University, and#34;Getting Hegemony Right - Analysis of the United States as a and#34;Hyperpowerand#34; Nationand#34;, The National Interest, Spring, Lexis A critical ingredient in stabilizing international relations in a world of radical power disparities is Existential threats are likely —- democratic alliances founded on mutual restraint build capacity to prevent and mitigate their impactIkenberry 11 – G. John Ikenberry, Peter F. Krogh Professor of Global Justice at the School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University, and#34;A World of Our Makingand#34;, Democracy: A Journal of Ideas, Issue ~2321, Summer, http://www.democracyjournal.org/21/a-world-of-our-making-1.php?page=all-http://www.democracyjournal.org/21/a-world-of-our-making-1.php?page=all Grand Strategy as Liberal Order Building American dominance of the global system will eventually yield Contention 3 —- SOPUnchecked war power sets a precedent that causes the executive to broadly ignore Congressional controlsBarron 8 – David J. Barron, Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and Martin S. Lederman, Visiting Professor of Law at the Georgetown University Law Center, and#34;The Commander in Chief at the Lowest Ebb — A Constitutional Historyand#34;, Harvard Law Review, February, 121 Harv. L. Rev. 941, Lexis Thus, as future administrations contemplate the extent of their own discretion at the and#34; U.S. war powers are modeled internationally —- the precedent of unilateral executive authority ruins global human rights norms and encourages preemptive conflict in multiple hotspotsSloane 8 – Sloane, Associate Professor of Law, Boston University School of Law, 2008 (Robert, Boston University Law Review, April, 88 B.U.L. Rev. 341, Lexis) There is a great deal more constitutional history that arguably bears on the scope of Collapse of human rights norms causes global WMD conflictBurke-White 4 – William W., Lecturer in Public and International Affairs and Senior Special Assistant to the Dean at the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University and Ph.D. at Cambridge, and#34;Human Rights and National Security: The Strategic Correlationand#34;, The Harvard Human Rights Journal, Spring, 17 Harv. Hum. Rts. J. 249, Lexis This Article presents a strategic—as opposed to ideological or normative—argument that Conflict’s likely in Taiwan, Georgia, and India/Pakistan —- U.S. signal’s keyRehman 12 – Fehzan Rehman, International Relations at the University of Westminster, and#34;Analyzing America’s National Security Strategyand#34;, e-International Relations, 9-13, http://www.e-ir.info/2012/09/13/analyzing-americas-national-security-strategy/ Another implication on sovereignty, due to the NSS, was, yet again, Preemption ruins U.S. leverage to deescalate regional crises —- goes nuclearSteinberg 2 – James B. Steinberg, Vice President and Director of Foreign Policy at the Brookings Institution, Michael E. O’Hanlon and Susan E. Rice, and#34;The New National Security Strategy and Preemptionand#34;, Brookings Policy Brief Series, December, http://www.brookings.edu/research/papers/2002/12/terrorism-ohanlon The Dangers of Legitimating Preemption A final concern relates to the impact of the precedent Requiring formal declaration of war restores Congressional war powers and balances SOP by checking the ExecutiveWeinberger 9 – Seth Weinberger, Assistant Professor in the Department of Politics and Government at the University of Puget Sound, M.A. and Ph.D. in Political Science from Duke University, and#34;Balancing War Powers in an Age of Terrorand#34;, The Good Society, 18(2), http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/good_society/v018/18.2.weinberger.html The key to developing a constitutionally, legally, and practically sound balanced theory of Congress must be the first moverHansen 9 – Hansen and Friedman, professors of law at the New England School of Law, 2009 (Victor and Lawrence, The Case for Congress: Separation of Powers and the War on Terror, p.130) The problem, of course, is that much of this congressional involvement has come Only formal checks signal restraintDamrosch 97 – Lori Fisler Damrosch, Professor of Law at the Columbia University School of Law, and#34;Use of Force and Constitutionalismand#34;, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 36 Colum. J. Transnat’l L. 449, Lexis Structural-institutional explanations, on the other hand, point to features of liberal Plan –The United States Federal Government should require Congressional authorization prior to initiating military action, unless to repel attacks on the United States.Plan’s the perfect balance that checks the Executive but preserves defensive capabilitiesLobel 8 – Jules Lobel, Professor at University of Pittsburgh Law School, and#34;War Powers for the 21st Century: The Constitutional Perspectiveand#34;, Testimony Before the Subcommittee on International Organizations, Human Rights and Oversight Committee on Foreign Affairs U.S. House of Representatives, 4-10, http://democrats.foreignaffairs.house.gov/110/lob041008.htm III Revising the War Powers Resolution I believe that it is necessary and possible to Flexibility and speed turns are totally wrongStreichler 8 – Stuart Streichler, Adjunct Faculty at Seattle University School of Law. Ph.D. at Johns Hopkins University; J.D. at the University of Michigan Law School; B.S. at Bowling Green State University, and#34;Mad about Yoo, or Why Worry about the Next Unconstitutional Warand#34;, The Journal of Law 26 Politics, Winter, 24 J. L. 26 Politics 93, Lexis When Yoo discusses the need for flexibility in the process for warmaking, he creates Plan overcomes barriers to enforcementLobel 9 – Jules Lobel, Professor of Law at the University of Pittsburgh. and#34;Restore. Protect. Expand. Amend the War Powers Resolutionand#34;. Center for Constitutional Rights White Paper, http://ccrjustice.org files CCR_White_WarPowers.pdf The War Powers Resolution should explicitly prohibit executive acts of war without previous Congressional authorization Lack of prior participation causes interference in duration and conduct of warBarron 8 – David J. Barron, Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and Martin S. Lederman, Visiting Professor of Law at the Georgetown University Law Center, and#34;The Commander in Chief at the Lowest Ebb — A Constitutional Historyand#34;, Harvard Law Review, February, 121 Harv. L. Rev. 941, Lexis By the conclusion of the Clinton Administration, however, it appeared that something of | 10/4/13 |
Hostilities 1AC - USC 2Tournament: USC | Round: 2 | Opponent: Emory AB | Judge: Kallmyer Plan: The United States Federal Government should require Congressional authorization prior to initiating military use of force, unless to repel attacks on the United States.Contention 1: R2PU.S. is pushing a norm of Responsibility to Protect —- alienates Russia and China and risks global great power conflictTrombly 11 – Dan Trombly, Ph.D Candidate in International Relations at George Washington University, "The Upending of Sovereignty", 8-27, http://slouchingcolumbia.wordpress.com/2011/08/27/the-upending-of-sovereignty/ of this new set of norms is that it will ultimately increase the enmity | 1/3/14 |
Hostilities 1AC - USC 6Tournament: USC | Round: 6 | Opponent: OU LW | Judge: Guevara, Omar Note only the Underview and plan are posted because all else was the same from UK RR Round 8 versus OU LM3The United States Federal Government should require Congressional authorization prior to initiating military use of force.4Their "no value to life" argument ignores the subjectivity of each person’s values. Life should be first.Steven Lee is the H.L.A. Hart Visiting Research Fellow at the Center for Ethics and Philosophy of Law and University College for Michaelmas, as well as Visiting Research Fellow at the Changing Character of War Programme. He is a Professor in the Humanities and Professor of Philosophy at Hobart and William Smith Colleges, Reviewed work(s): Nuclear Deterrence, Morality and Realism. by John Finnis ; Joseph M. Boyle, Jr. ; The claim that nuclear devastation and Soviet domination cannot be compared in consequentialist terms rests Focus on pragmatic solutions is vital. This also proves the solution to the Right is university students like us – a uniqueness trend they reverse.Gitlin ’5 If we lose pre-fiat, then we do nothing. But they’re WORSE THAN NOTHING. No Framework QUESTION can veer this round from the NEXUS QUESTION OF CONCRETE ALTS. Without those, we’re awful activists. This assumes waste.Bryant ’12 I must be in a mood today– half irritated, half amused –because | 1/4/14 |
Hostilities 1AC - Wake 3Tournament: Wake | Round: 3 | Opponent: Rutgers RS | Judge: Harper, Allison PlanThe authority of the President of the United States to impose military force without prior legislative declaration should be substantially restrained.Executive PrecedentsContention One: Executive PrecedentsUnchecked war power sets a precedent now.Barron ’8 The precedent spills-beyond war power. Means executives are unchecked on many issues.Barron ’8 It gets modeled worldwide. Debates about the precedent check preventive wars and other abuses of executive authority.Sloane ’8 Legislative restraints means fewer Executives starting fewer conflicts worldwide. For executive authority, teaching the heuristic of work within institutions is a pre-req.Grynaviski ’13 Conclusion The burden of the argument, thus far, has been to show that Pragmatism’s key in this context. "Root cause" and "cure-alls" won’t check violence.Bacevich ’13 There is, wrote H. L. Mencken, "always a well- Legislative checks solve both advantages. Without them, executive-induced casualties will persist.Zelizer ’11 Preventive war standard causes large death tolls globally.Williams ’12 THE UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES OF FIGHTING THIS ILLEGAL WAR America should be concerned about setting a DronesContention Two – DronesLack of a legislative role cedes war-fighting to the executive. This drives secretive policy – including the squo’s non-transparent drone policy.Bacevich 13 Twelve and a half years after Congress didn’t declare war on an organization of hundreds Drones can’t be wished-away – they’ll exist in other nations. Even if Congress did little, public light matters. A more-transparent precedent dissuades global use and halts a distinct mechanism for violence versus dissent.Boyle ’13 An important, but overlooked, strategic consequence of the Obama administra - tion’s embrace Drones cause deaths. This ev also proves international experiences are a "starting-point boomerang" shaping oppressive domestic practices.Graham ’10 Such fantasies of high -tech omnipotence are much more than science fiction. As HeuristicMacro-Institutional starting points are often critiqued. But micro-starting points of SELF or societal, instead of State, transformation are less effective in this narrow context.Stuhr ’8 And then what, now what? What should a meliorist do? Terrible lovers Prefer specificity of our contingent truth claimsPRICE ’98 One of the central departures of critical international theory from positivism is the view that The ballot’s role should include State theorization. Even if Plan’s never passes, our framework advances a broader heuristic imperative. This teaches a State-inclusive civic engagement that spills to many issues.Liu ’12 A Crucible Moment likewise calls for transformations necessary for this generation. A daunting one is to eliminate persistent The heuristic’s impact is enormous. It includes this room, but extends beyond it.Liu ’12 We therefore invite all stakeholders in America’s future to join together to become civic agents There are many ways to spin "civic engagement", but Liu confirms our read. It’s NOT ENOUGH FOR THEM TO WIN "STATE BAD", they also need to win "State Shunning" is the right strategy.Liu ’13 That certainly was the message of a recent interview and essay by the comedian Russell "State" or "Framework" indicts miss that we aren’t standard rational policy making. Heuristics teach both specific plans AND revise general problem-solving skills. Yes, the Neg has a heuristic – but our ev assumes policy heuristics and plausible Alts.Hendrick ’94 Newell and Simon (1972) were among the first scholars in the area of If we lose pre-fiat, then we do nothing. But non-concrete activism is WORSE THAN NOTHING. No Framework QUESTION can veer this round from the NEXUS QUESTION OF CONCRETE ALTS. Without those, we’re awful activists.Coverstone ’5 Debates over the relative efficacy of political strategies for pro-social change must confront Even if "fiat’s not real", and Affs don’t control levers of power today, we advance a heuristic. Without this heuristic of fiat, we’ll re-enforce dangerous nihilism.Hoff ’6 There is no question that helping educational leadership students become self-analytical and reflect And, if the debate winds-up a "tie", presumption should shift in favor of change – best avoids nihilism.We’re not pro-State, but we’re "anti-anti State". Some things can ONLY be solved "through the system". Lifting existing POTUS authority is such an issue:Barbrook ’97 Serial Policy Failure wrong and Policy Nihilism Bad.Tallis ’97 If we deny or rubbish the progress that mankind has already made, and at | 11/16/13 |
Hostilities 1AC - Wake 6Tournament: Wake | Round: 6 | Opponent: Georgetown AM | Judge: Brossmann PlanThe United States Federal Government should require Congressional authorization prior to initiating military use of force, unless to repel attacks on the United States.1Contention 1 is WarfightingPower projection structurally fails because operations are guided by incoherent strategies disconnected from national political willSmidt 9 – Lieutenant Colonel Michael L. Smidt, Acting Staff Judge Advocate in the United States Army, "The Proposed 2009 War Powers Consultation Act", 3-19, www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA500649 Shared Decisions Generate Greater Strategic Certainty Although the primary benefit from a joint Congressional and Libya removed all remaining checks on unilateral executive war-making —- ruins accountability and signal of unified resolveWebb 13 – Jim Webb, Former U.S. Senator from Virginia and Secretary of the Navy in the Reagan Administration, "Congressional Abdication", The National Interest, 3-1, http://nationalinterest.org/article/congressional-abdication-8138?page=show The president followed no clear historical standard when he unilaterally decided to use force in That crushes unit cohesion, morale, and allied support —- Congressional approval’s keyFrye 2 – Alton Frye, Presidential Senior Fellow Emeritus and Director of the Program on Congress and Foreign Policy at the Council on Foreign Relations, "Applying the War Powers Resolution to the War on Terrorism", Testimony Before the Senate Judiciary Committee, 4-17, http://www.cfr.org/terrorism/applying-war-powers-resolution-war-terrorism/p4514 4. CONSENSUS IS ESSENTIAL TO NATIONAL COHESION The case for active, continuing congressional Effective power projection stops hotspot escalation to nuclear warO’Hanlon 7 – Frederick Kagan, Resident Scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, and Michael O’Hanlon, Senior Fellow and Sydney Stein Jr. Chair in Foreign Policy Studies at the Brookings Institution, "The Case for Larger Ground Forces", Stanley Foundation Report, April, http://stanleyfoundation.org/publications/other/Kagan_OHanlon_07.pdf We live at a time when wars not only rage in nearly every region but Executive war power ruins cooperation and global alliancesSchiffer 9 – Adam Schiffer, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Political Science at Texas Christian University, and Carrie Liu Currier, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Political Science at Texas Christian University, "War Powers, International Alliances, the President, and Congress", http://apcentral.collegeboard.com/apc/public/repository/US_Gov_Balance_of_Power_SF.pdf The president’s advantages over Congress in the foreign policy realm have consequences far beyond the Grounding use of force in constitutionally-based SOP creates a perception of benign hegemony and encourages international cooperation based on rule of lawIkenberry 1 – G. John, Peter F. Krogh Professor of Global Justice at the School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University, "Getting Hegemony Right - Analysis of the United States as a "Hyperpower" Nation", The National Interest, Spring, Lexis A critical ingredient in stabilizing international relations in a world of radical power disparities is Existential threats are likely —- democratic alliances founded on mutual restraint build capacity to prevent and mitigate their impactIkenberry 11 – G. John Ikenberry, Peter F. Krogh Professor of Global Justice at the School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University, "A World of Our Making", Democracy: A Journal of Ideas, Issue ~2321, Summer, http://www.democracyjournal.org/21/a-world-of-our-making-1.php?page=all-http://www.democracyjournal.org/21/a-world-of-our-making-1.php?page=all Grand Strategy as Liberal Order Building American dominance of the global system will eventually yield Plan boosts credible negotiating power by locking in public and Congressional support prior to conflictGelb 5 – Leslie H. Gelb, President Emeritus of the Council on Foreign Relations and Anne-Marie Slaughter, Dean of the Woodrow Wilson School of International and Public Affairs, "Declare War", The Atlantic, 11-1, http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2005/11/declare-war/304301/?single_page=true-http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2005/11/declare-war/304301/?single_page=true In the wake of the Vietnam War, Congress tried to fix this problem by That solves the need for intervention and stops overstretchDueck 10 – Colin Dueck, Associate Professor of Public and International Affairs at George Mason University, "Regaining a Realistic Foreign Policy", Policy Review, No. 162, 8-1, http://www.hoover.org/publications/policy-review/article/43426 Fifth, think of diplomacy as simply one tool in America’s foreign policy toolkit, 2Contention 2 is CMRIraq and Afghanistan wrecked CMR – only strong legislative oversight revitalizes itYingling 10 The U.S. faces a number of difficult challenges in civil-military Congress must move first – only vigorous assertion of its role solves CMRYingling 10 Congress must be equally vigorous in resisting expansive interpretations of executive authority. Hasty and Formal legislative checks are vital to civilian control of the militaryMarano 2 A critical analysis of the Vietnam War shows why Congress’s constitutional mandate to declare war Civilian control prevents nuclear miscalc that causes extinctionFried 12 This material contextual dynamic is also illustrated by a novel shift in civil military relations Countries model the trend away from civilian control – it’s not resilient and executive self-restraint failsCimbala 12 That said, the pendulum in the U.S. case is swinging toward Domestic failure of civilian control cranks joint CMR training programs abroadKohn 2 Ponder whether you are prepared to accept, as a principle of civilian control, U.S. model of CMR and joint training solve existential threats in every hotspotCimbala 12 An interesting question with respect to civil-military relations is whether modernizing autocracies with Training in Nigeria solves instabilityDewey 2 The professor noted that the leadership must try to "demystify" the military, That goes nuclearLancaster 00 THE MOST BASIC CHALLENGE facing the United States today is helping to preserve peace. US will get drawn in – their defense doesn’t assume NigeriaFrancis 3-4-13 What’s clear, however, is that U.S. commitments in Africa are The U.S. needs to revitalize CMR promotion in Pakistan – solves instabilityTellis 8 Ongoing violence in Pakistan serves as a constant reminder of the immense challenges facing President Instability goes nuclearPitt 9 a New York Times and internationally bestselling author of two books: "War on Iraq: What Team Bush Doesn’t Want You to Know" and "The Greatest Sedition Is Silence." (5/8/09, William, "Unstable Pakistan Threatens the World," http://www.arabamericannews.com/news/index.php?mod=article26cat=commentary26article=2183) SolvencyContention 3 is solvencyPlan’s the perfect balance that checks the Executive but preserves defensive capabilitiesLobel 8 – Jules Lobel, Professor at University of Pittsburgh Law School, "War Powers for the 21st Century: The Constitutional Perspective", Testimony Before the Subcommittee on International Organizations, Human Rights and Oversight Committee on Foreign Affairs U.S. House of Representatives, 4-10, http://democrats.foreignaffairs.house.gov/110/lob041008.htm III Revising the War Powers Resolution I believe that it is necessary and possible to Flexibility and speed turns are totally wrongStreichler 8 – Stuart Streichler, Adjunct Faculty at Seattle University School of Law. Ph.D. at Johns Hopkins University; J.D. at the University of Michigan Law School; B.S. at Bowling Green State University, "Mad about Yoo, or Why Worry about the Next Unconstitutional War", The Journal of Law 26 Politics, Winter, 24 J. L. 26 Politics 93, Lexis When Yoo discusses the need for flexibility in the process for warmaking, he creates | 11/21/13 |
Hostilities Iran 1AC - Wake 8Tournament: Wake | Round: 8 | Opponent: NU OP | Judge: Andres Gannon Contention 1—-IranThe U.S. relies on threats of force against Iran—-this blocks successful negotiationsJudis 13 – John B. Judis, Senior Editor at the New Republic, "Should the U.S. Continue to Threaten Iran With War?", New Republic, 6-28, http://www.newrepublic.com/article/113702/should-us-continue-threaten-iran-war~~23 "President Barack Obama is not bluffing," Vice President Joseph Biden told AIPAC’s annual Coercive diplomacy dooms any deal—-Iran’s fundamentally defensive and prolif’s a response to U.S. threats—-pressure speeds up nuclearization and empowers hardliners who won’t compromisePillar 13 – Dr. Paul R. Pillar, Professor and Senior Fellow at the Center for Security Studies at Georgetown University and Nonresident Senior Fellow in Foreign Policy at the Brookings Institution, Ph.D. in Politics from Princeton University, MA in Politics from Oxford University, "Threats of Force Don’t Always Help", The National Interest, 9-15, http://nationalinterest.org/blog/paul-pillar/threats-force-dont-always-help-9072 The danger of the commonly accepted conclusion comes from promoting a simple belief that " Threats have no upside—-there’s already sufficient leverage to push a dealThielmann 13 – Greg Thielmann, Senior Fellow of the Arms Control Association and Former Office Director for Strategic, Proliferation, and Military Affairs In the State Department’s Bureau of Intelligence and Research, "Senators’ Iran Letter Complicates Solution", 8-6, http://nationalinterest.org/commentary/senators-iran-letter-complicates-solution-8836?page=1 With tough economic sanctions now in place, and a broad political consensus holding among Iran’s on the verge of break-out that causes arms races and conflict that goes nuclear—-only diplomacy that abandons threats can solveAkinbiyi 12 – Ani Akinbiyi, MPA from the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs at Princeton University, et al, Faculty Advisors: Frank Von Hippel, Hossein Mousavian, and R. Scott Kemp, "Preventing a Nuclear-Armed Iran: A Phased Grand Agenda", January, http://wws.princeton.edu/research/pwreports_fy11/Preventing-a-Nuclear-Armed-Iran.pdf Overview For over a decade, Iran and the international community have engaged in an Nuclear war’s likely through miscalc, accidents, or theft—-their defense is old and disprovenKahl 12 – Colin, Associate Professor at Georgetown University’s Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service, Former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for the Middle East and Senior Fellow at the Center for a New American Security, "Iran and the Bomb", Foreign Affairs, September / October, Ebsco Kenneth Waltz is probably right that a nuclear-armed Iran could be deterred from Deterrence will failEdelman 11 – Distinguished Fellow at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments (Eric S, "The Dangers of a Nuclear Iran," Foreign Affairs, January/February) Were Saudi Arabia to acquire nuclear weapons, the Middle East would count three nuclear ExtinctionPrimakov 9 – September, Yevgeny, President of the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of the Russian Federation; Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences; member of the Editorial Board of Russia in Global Affairs. This article is based on the scientific report for which the author was awarded the Lomonosov Gold Medal of the Russian Academy of Sciences in 2008, "The Middle East Problem in the Context of International Relations" The Middle East conflict is unparalleled in terms of its potential for spreading globally. Credibly facilitating negotiations spurs effective US/Iran cooperation—-solves conflict in Central Asia and AfghanistanAmeri 13 – Nasser Saghafi-Ameri, Former Senior Iranian Diplomat, and Scholar and Author in the Fields of Foreign Policy, International Security, and Nuclear Disarmament, "Restoration of Iran-US Relations Benefits Both Sides", Iran Review, 10-9, http://www.iranreview.org/content/Documents/Restoration-of-Iran-US-Relations-Benefits-Both-Sides.htm With some creative diplomacy and in contrast to its previous role as a spoiler in Afghanistan goes nuclearMorgan 7 (Stephen J., Political Writer and Former Member of the British Labour Party Executive Committee, "Better another Taliban Afghanistan, than a Taliban NUCLEAR Pakistan21?", 9-23, http://www.freearticlesarchive .com/article/_Better_another_Taliban_Afghanistanthan_a_Taliban_NUCLEAR_Pakistan_/99961/0/) However events may prove him sorely wrong. Indeed, his policy could completely backfire And Central AsiaStarr 1 – S. Frederick, Chairman of Central Asia-Caucasus Institute at Nitze School of Advanced Int’l. Studies at Johns Hopkins University, Federal Document Clearing House Congressional Testimony, "Central Asian Nations And The Campaign Against Terrorism", 12-13, Lexis However, this does not mean that US actions are without risk to the Central Plan tempers coercive diplomacy—-formal legislative checks stop threats and build international confidenceWaxman 13 – Matthew Waxman, Law Professor at Columbia Law School, "The Constitutional Power To Threaten War", Yale Law Journal, 10-1, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2316777 C. Legal Reform and Strategies of Threatened Force Among legal scholars of war powers Congressional restrictions send a key signalRitter 7 – Scott Ritter, Former Marine Intelligence Officer and Chief Weapons Inspector for the United Nations in Iraq from 1991 to 1998, "Stop The Iran War Before It Starts", The Nation, 12-27, http://www.countercurrents.org/iran-ritter270107.htm If hearings show no case for war with Iran, then Congress must act to Walking back threats of force is a CBM that enables negotiated agreements on other issuesSchechtman 10-17 – Ken Schechtman, Professor at the Washington University School of Medicine, "Negotiate with Iran before the Window of Opportunity Closes", St. Louis Beacon, 2013, https://www.stlbeacon.org/~~2321/content/33244/voices_schechtman_iran_101513?coverpage=4161 Iranians have vivid memories of 1953 and of our sponsorship of the shah. Other Plan’s a bold move that provides the key incentive for Iran to agree to stop proliferatingSagan 6 – Scott D. Sagan, Professor of Political Science at Stanford University and Senior Fellow at the Center for International Security and Cooperation and the Freeman Spogli Institute, "How to Make Tehran Blink", Newsweek, 8-28, http://www.partnershipforglobalsecurity-archive.org/Projects20and20Publications/News/Nuclear20News/2006/830200660402PM.html Given Tehran’s defiant response to the European and American effort to constrain its nuclear program Contention 2—-Congressional LeadershipIran’s the test case for Congress’ power—-proactive restriction of war reasserts legislative authority and sends a signal of renewed leadershipRitter 7 – Scott Ritter, Former Marine Intelligence Officer and Chief Weapons Inspector for the United Nations in Iraq from 1991 to 1998, "Calling on Congress to Stop a War", TruthDig, 12-7, http://www.truthdig.com/report/print/20071207_calling_on_congress_to_stop_a_war Personally, the NIE (and its roots in the findings of the IAEA inspections This spills over and builds institutional capacity for broader Congressional power —- active confrontation of the President’s keySchumer 7 – Charles E. Schumer, JD from Harvard Law School, AB in Politics from Harvard College, Senior United States Senator from New York, Youngest Representative in the History of New York State, "Under Attack: Congressional Power in the Twenty-First Century", Harvard Law 26 Policy Review, 1(1), http://web.archive.org/web/20120625034444/http://www.hlpronline.com/Vol1No1/schumer.pdf Every basic civics text recites that our government is divided into three branches and that Iran’s a rallying point for broader Congressional authorityBrecher 6 – Jeremy Brecher, Historian, Founder of the Labor Network for Sustainability, Winner of Five Regional Emmy Awards, and Brendan Smith, Co-Founder of Global Labor Strategies, Co-Director of the UCLA Law School’s Globalization and Labor Standards Project, and Consulting Partner with the Progressive Technology Project, "Attack Iran, Destroy the US Constitution", Asia Times, 4-26, http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/HD26Ak01.html Congressional response DeFazio is now preparing and seeking support from other House members for a Plan boosts Congressional experience, knowledge, and involvement in foreign policyHunter 13 – Robert E. Hunter, Former U.S. ambassador to NATO, Director of Middle East Affairs on the National Security Council Staff in the Carter Administration and Director of Transatlantic Security Studies at the National Defense University, "Restoring Congress’ Role In Making War", Iran Review, 9-1, http://www.iranreview.org/content/Documents/Restoring-Congress-Role-In-Making-War.htm But seeking authorization for the use of force from Congress as opposed to conducting consultations Iran’s critical to this processO’Hanlon 13 – Michael O’Hanlon, Senior Fellow at the Brookings Institution and Marvin Kalb, James Clark Welling Presidential Fellow at The George Washington University and Edward R. Murrow Professor Emeritus at Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government, "An Opportunity For Congress On The Road To War With Iran", Iran @ Saban, 7-3, http://www.brookings.edu/blogs/iran-at-saban/posts/2013/07/02-iran-war-congress-ohanlon-kalb ~Editor’s Note: Our Brookings colleagues Marvin Kalb and Michael O’Hanlon published an oped Congressional leadership’s key to foreign policy coherence—-solves multiple scenarios for extinctionHamilton 2 – Lee H., President and Director of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Vice Chairman of the 9/11 Commission, President’s Homeland Security Advisory Council, Former Member of the United States House of Representatives for 34 Years, Co-Chair of the Iraq Study Group, Formerly Special Assistant to the Director at the Woodrow Wilson Center, A Creative Tension: The Foreign Policy Roles of the President and Congress, p. 3-7 We face many dangers, however. The diversity of the security and economic threats Congressional power’s key to check unitary treaty power—-it’s tied to war powerHealy 00 – Gene Healy, Vice President at the Cato Institute and JD from University of Chicago Law School, "Arrogance of Power Reborn: The Imperial Presidency and Foreign Policy in the Clinton Years", Cato Policy Analysis No. 389, 12-13, http://www.cato.org/publications/policy-analysis/arrogance-power-reborn-imperial-presidency-foreign-policy-clinton-years As William Jefferson Clinton came to power in January 1993, there was some reason Treaty power’s unchecked now—-restrictions on war power stop Executive interpretation and withdrawalTelman 7 – Jeremy Telman, Assistant Professor at Valparaiso University Law School, Ph.D. from Cornell University and J.D. from New York University School of Law, "Does the Constitution Matter?: A Review of Peter Irons, War Powers: How the Imperial Presidency Hijacked the Constitution", Temple Law Review, Spring, 80 Temp. L. Rev. 245, Lexis A. Interactions of War Powers and the Treaty Power Yoo repeatedly states that he Executive interpretation unravels the treaty systemWeiss 11 – Joshua Weiss, JD from George Washington University Law School, "Defining Executive Deference in Treaty Interpretation Cases", George Washington Law Review, 79(5), July, http://groups.law.gwu.edu/lr/ArticlePDF/79-5-Weiss.pdf B. Total-Deference Proposals Total deference, by contrast, would grant executive Threat alone ruins negotiating cred—-only Congressional action creates an international perception of reliabilityDe Groot 9 – Daniel De Groot, Reporter at Open Left, "Congress Needs to Assert Itself on Treaty Abrogation and Withdrawal", Open Left, 11-29, http://www.openleft.com/diary/16236/congress-needs-to-assert-itself-on-treaty-abrogation-and-withdrawal There was a bit of good news this week, in that the Obama administration The entire international legal architecture will become ineffectiveKoplow 13 – David A. Koplow, Professor of Law and Director of the Center for Applied Legal Studies at Georgetown University Law Center, "Indisputable Violations: What Happens When the United States Unambiguously Breaches a Treaty?", The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs, 37(1), Winter, http://www.fletcherforum.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Koplow_37-1.pdf However, there is a cost when the world’s strongest state behaves this way. ExtinctionMoss 10 – Lawrence C. Moss, JD from Stanford Law and Special Counsel for U.N. Reform at Human Rights Watch, "Renewing America’s Commitment To International Law", UNA-USA Occassional Paper, March, http://www.academia.edu/2593461/Renewing_Americas_Commitment_to_International_Law The US is party to literally thousands of treaties and binding international agreements that provide Contention 3: SolvencyObama will complyBarron 8 – David J. Barron, Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and Martin S. Lederman, Visiting Professor of Law at the Georgetown University Law Center, "The Commander in Chief at the Lowest Ebb — A Constitutional History", Harvard Law Review, February, 121 Harv. L. Rev. 941, Lexis In addition to offering important guidance concerning the congressional role, our historical review also Especially on IranPressTV 13 – "Washington Prefers a Diplomatic Solution to Disputes with Iran: Obama", 9-24, http://www.presstv.com/detail/2013/09/24/325786/washington-prefers-diplomacy-with-iran/ US President Barack Obama says Washington prefers a diplomatic solution to its disputes with Iran Plan overcomes barriers to enforcementLobel 9 – Jules Lobel, Professor of Law at the University of Pittsburgh. "Restore. Protect. Expand. Amend the War Powers Resolution". Center for Constitutional Rights White Paper, http://ccrjustice.org files CCR_White_WarPowers.pdf The War Powers Resolution should explicitly prohibit executive acts of war without previous Congressional authorization Iran’s a rallying point for broader Congressional authorityBrecher 6 – Jeremy Brecher, Historian, Founder of the Labor Network for Sustainability, Winner of Five Regional Emmy Awards, and Brendan Smith, Co-Founder of Global Labor Strategies, Co-Director of the UCLA Law School’s Globalization and Labor Standards Project, and Consulting Partner with the Progressive Technology Project, "Attack Iran, Destroy the US Constitution", Asia Times, 4-26, http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/HD26Ak01.html Congressional response DeFazio is now preparing and seeking support from other House members for a | 12/14/13 |
Hostilities NoKo 1AC - USC OctosTournament: USC | Round: Octas | Opponent: Kansas BC | Judge: Nikolic, Warden, Kallmyer, Layton, Brovero The United States Federal Government should require Congressional authorization prior to introduction of United States Armed Forces into hostilities with the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, unless to repel attacks by the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea.1Contention 1: No KoU.S. relies on threats of force against North Korea—-makes prolif inevitableHallinan 13 (Conn, Foreign Policy In Focus columnist. Hallinan is also a columnist for the Berkeley Daily Planet, and an occasional free lance medical policy writer. He is a recipient of a Project Censored "Real News Award." He formally ran the journalism program at the University of California at Santa Cruz, where he was also a college provost, Counterpunch, "Obama’s Flawed Korea Policies," April 28, http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/04/26/obamas-flawed-korea-policies/-http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/04/26/obamas-flawed-korea-policies/) Ignoring North Korea, however, did not sit well with Japan and South Korea Walking back threats empowers moderates and spurs reformScobell 5 (Andrew, Associate Research Professor at the Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College, and Adjunct Professor of Political Science at Dickinson College, "NORTH KOREA’S STRATEGIC INTENTIONS," July, http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pdffiles/pub611.pdf-http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pdffiles/pub611.pdf) Selig Harrison: Regime Is Moderating. Selig Harrison is a long time observer and Korean prolif causes war and EMP use—-extinctionPry 13 (Peter Vincent, executive director of the Task Force on National and Homeland Security, and served on the Congressional EMP Commission and the House Armed Services Committee and at the CIA, Washington Times, PRY: The danger of dismissing North Korea’s nuclear threat, April 15, http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/apr/15/the-danger-of-dismissing-north-koreas-nuclear-thre/?page=all-http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/apr/15/the-danger-of-dismissing-north-koreas-nuclear-thre/?page=all) North Korean EMP threat is high and causes global warsPry 12 (Peter, executive director of the Task Force on National and Homeland Security, and served on the Congressional EMP Commission and the House Armed Services Committee and at the CIA, "PRY: North Korea EMP attack could destroy U.S. — now," December 19, http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/dec/19/north-korea-emp-attack-could-destroy-us-now/?page=all-http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/dec/19/north-korea-emp-attack-could-destroy-us-now/?page=all) North Korea has labored for years and starved its people so it could develop an Formal restraint recruits Chinese support—-makes reunification peacefulBeinart 13 (Peter, former editor of The New Republic, he has written for Time, The New York Times, The New York Review of Books among other periodicals, and is the author of three books, The Daily Beast, "Hey, Obama: Keep Out of North Korea," April 8, http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/04/08/obama-can-help-stop-north-korea-by-promising-never-to-station-troops.html-http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/04/08/obama-can-help-stop-north-korea-by-promising-never-to-station-troops.html) Ever since the Cold War’s end, the government of the United States has done North Korean collapse’s inevitable—-peaceful reunification prevents instabilityBandow 12-17 (Doug, Senior Fellow at the Cato Institute, "North Korea’s Dangerous Shakeup," 2013, http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/north-koreas-dangerous-shakeup?utm_source=buffer26utm_campaign=Buffer26utm_content=bufferf19bd26utm_medium=twitter-http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/north-koreas-dangerous-shakeup?utm_source=buffer26utm_campaign=Buffer26utm_content=bufferf19bd26utm_medium=twitter) Nevertheless, the DPRK could be heading for further instability. The episode is unprecedented Unstable collapse draws in great powers and goes nuclearBennett, 13 (bruce w., senior defense analyst at the rand corporation and ph.d. in policy analysis from the pardee rand graduate school, "preparing for the possibility of a north korean collapse", rand corporation, http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR300/RR331/RAND_RR331.pdf-http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR300/RR331/RAND_RR331.pdf) The most immediate consequences of a North Korean government collapse will occur in North Korea ExtinctionHayes and Green 10 (Peter, Professor of International Relations – Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology and Director – Nautilus Institute, and Michael Hamel, Victoria University, "The Path Not Taken, the Way Still Open: Denuclearizing the Korean Peninsula and Northeast Asia", Nautilus Institute Special Report, 1-5, http://www.nautilus.org/fora/security/10001HayesHamalGreen.pdf-http://www.nautilus.org/fora/security/10001HayesHamalGreen.pdf) The consequences of failing to address the proliferation threat posed by the North Korea developments US/China co-op solves the impactSnyder 7 (Scott, senior associate at the Asia Foundation and the Pacific Forum of the Center for Strategic and International Studies. He was a program officer at the United States Institute of Peace from 1994 to 1999. Joel Witt, senior associate at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, United States Institute for Peace, "Chinese Views Breaking the Stalemate on the Korean Peninsula," February, http://www.usip.org/sites/default/files/resources/sr183.pdf-http://www.usip.org/sites/default/files/resources/sr183.pdf) While managing the six-party talks is likely to pose a continuing challenge, Korea’s the test case for US/China relationsRozman 9 (Gilbert, Musgrove Professor of Sociology – Princeton University, "The North Korean Nuclear Crisis and Sino-U.S. Relations", The Daily Princetonian, 10-21, http://www.dailyprincetonian.com/2009/10/21/24214/-http://www.dailyprincetonian.com/2009/10/21/24214/) In 2005, 2007 and again in U.N. Security Council resolutions of Solves global food shocksMcElroy’97 (Michael and Chris Nielson, Chair, Department, Earth and Sciences, Harvard, Dir- Environmental China Project, Harvard, Living with China: US-China Relations in the Twenty-First Century, 25) Another US interest concerns the security of China’s food production and it’s openness to trade ExtinctionBrown 9 (Lester R, Founder of the Worldwatch Institute and the Earth Policy Institute "Can Food Shortages Bring Down Civilization?" Scientific American, May, http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=civilization-food-shortages-http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=civilization-food-shortages) The biggest threat to global stability is the potential for food crises in poor countries Plan tempers coercive diplomacy—-formal legislative checks stop threats and build international confidenceWaxman 13 – Matthew Waxman, Law Professor at Columbia Law School, "The Constitutional Power To Threaten War", Yale Law Journal, 10-1, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2316777 C. Legal Reform and Strategies of Threatened Force Among legal scholars of war powers 2Contention 2 – Asia PivotPivot’s inevitable—-Congressional involvement’s necessary to make it a coherent strategyForbes 13 Forbes: If you listen to people who talked when they first started talking about Plan boosts Congressional involvement and makes it effectiveHunter 13 – Robert E. Hunter, Former U.S. ambassador to NATO, Director of Middle East Affairs on the National Security Council Staff in the Carter Administration and Director of Transatlantic Security Studies at the National Defense University, "Restoring Congress’ Role In Making War", Iran Review, 9-1, http://www.iranreview.org/content/Documents/Restoring-Congress-Role-In-Making-War.htm But seeking authorization for the use of force from Congress as opposed to conducting consultations North Korea is the test case—-determines Chinese reactionsMorris 13 In this context, the crisis on the Korean Peninsula can be seen as the Successful pivot solves existential threats—-restricting war-making authority is vitalColby 11 Political sentiment in the United States seems to be turning against the interventions and nation Congressional participation in the pivot is vital to stop Chinese military modernizationForbes 13 While the committee will continue to conduct strong oversight of our nation’s efforts to degrade Chinese modernization collapses the global economy—-pivot solvesBarno 12 The Obama administration’s desire to play a larger role in the Asia-Pacific makes Economic collapse goes nuclearAuslin 9 (Michael, Resident Scholar – American Enterprise Institute, and Desmond Lachman – Resident Fellow – American Enterprise Institute, "The Global Economy Unravels", Forbes, 3-6, http://www.aei.org/article/100187) Only Congress sets the tone for the pivot – gets China to expand market access and embrace flexible exchange ratesManyin 12 Implications for Congress¶ The Administration’s "rebalancing" toward Asia and the Pacific comes Chinese market access is the lifeblood of U.S. competitivenessAmCham 12 A focus for U.S. companies should be China’s Strategic ¶ Emerging Industries That solves nuclear warKhalilzad 11 (Zalmay, Counselor – Center for Strategic and International Studies, Former U.S. Permanent Representative – United Nations, Former U.S. Ambassador – Iraq, "The Economy and National Security", National Review, 2-8, http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/259024/economy-and-national-security-zalmay-khalilzad) Flexible exchange rate prevents Chinese economic shocksRogoff 12 One of the most notable macroeconomic developments in recent years has been the sharp drop Shocks causes diversionary warsDeWeaver 13 As the Chinese juggernaut starts to lose momentum, should Americans be breathing a collective Those escalate globallyKaminski 7 (Antoni Z., Professor – Institute of Political Studies, "World Order: The Mechanics of Threats (Central European Perspective)", Polish Quarterly of International Affairs, 1, p. 58) 3Obama will complyBarron 8 – David J. Barron, Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and Martin S. Lederman, Visiting Professor of Law at the Georgetown University Law Center, "The Commander in Chief at the Lowest Ebb — A Constitutional History", Harvard Law Review, February, 121 Harv. L. Rev. 941, Lexis In addition to offering important guidance concerning the congressional role, our historical review also Especially on North KoreaRapp-Hooper, 13 (mira, stanton nuclear security fellow at the council on foreign relations and phd candidate in political science at columbia university and mphil from columbia university, 9/13, "do chemical weapons threaten us extended deterrence in asia?", the diplomat, http://thediplomat.com/flashpoints-blog/2013/09/13/do-chemical-weapons-threaten-us-extended-deterrence-in-asia/-http://thediplomat.com/flashpoints-blog/2013/09/13/do-chemical-weapons-threaten-us-extended-deterrence-in-asia/) On the other hand, the decision-making process over intervention in Syria has Plan overcomes barriers to enforcementLobel 9 – Jules Lobel, Professor of Law at the University of Pittsburgh. "Restore. Protect. Expand. Amend the War Powers Resolution". Center for Constitutional Rights White Paper, http://ccrjustice.org files CCR_White_WarPowers.pdf The War Powers Resolution should explicitly prohibit executive acts of war without previous Congressional authorization Binding law key to clarity of signalShaffer 11 – Gregory Shaffer, Professor of Law, University of Minnesota Law School, and Mark Pollack, Professor of Political Science and Jean Monnet Chair, Temple University., Sept 2011, ARTICLE: HARD VERSUS SOFT LAW IN INTERNATIONAL SECURITY, 52 B.C. L. Rev 1147 As we have observed in our previous scholarship, the existing analyses of hard and | 1/6/14 |
Iran - 1AR - UK RR 2Tournament: UK RR | Round: 2 | Opponent: Michigan AP | Judge: Hardy No historical evidence for their argumentDiehl 6 – Paul F. Diehl, Henning Larson Professor of Political Science at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and Tom Ginsburg, Professor of Law and Political Science at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, "Irrational War and Constitutional Design: A Reply to Professors Nzelibe and Yoo", Michigan Journal of International Law, Summer, 27 Mich. J. Int’l L. 1239, Lexis The second scenario is perhaps the one that concerns the authors: executive initiative that Resolve is impossible without Congressional backingHowell et al 5 Dispelling Myths of Political Resolve: A large body of work on crisis bargaining ¶ | 10/4/13 |
Iran DA - 1AR - Clay 4Tournament: Clay | Round: 4 | Opponent: Kentucky GV | Judge: Brown, Nick Iran DA – Ext – Syria Ruins the DAObama got rejectedWeisman 13 – Jonathan Weisman, "Obama Delays Syria Strike to Focus on a Russian Plan", New York Times, 9-11, http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/11/world/middleeast/syrian-chemical-arsenal.html?pagewanted=all President Obama, facing implacable opposition to a strike against Syria in Congress and throughout the country, said Tuesday that he would hold off on military action for now and pursue a Russian proposal for international monitors to take over and destroy Syria’s arsenal of chemical weapons. Triggers the link—-their authorAlterman 13 – Jon Alterman, CSIS Global Security Chair and Middle East Program Director, 9/4/13, US-Iran Nuclear Deal Hinges On Syria Vote, www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2013/09/us-iran-nuclear-deal-hinges-on-syria-vote.html Focusing solely on events in Syria, however, misses a large part of the Iran DA – Ext – No LinkThey say "flex" but NO ONE thinks Obama would unilaterally strike IranKramer 13 – Kramer 9/17/13 http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2013/09/17/israel-likes-its-u-s-presidents-strong-2/-http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2013/09/17/israel-likes-its-u-s-presidents-strong-2/ Martin Kramer is President of Shalem College, a new undergraduate liberal arts college in Jerusalem. An authority on contemporary Islam and Arab politics, Kramer earned his undergraduate and doctoral degrees in Near Eastern Studies from Princeton University. During a twenty-five-year academic career at Tel Aviv University, he directed the Moshe Dayan Center for Middle Eastern and African Studies. Kramer has taught as a visiting professor at Brandeis University, the University of Chicago, Cornell University, Georgetown University, and The Johns Hopkins University (SAIS). He has served as a visiting fellow at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars in Washington, The Washington Institute for Near East Policy, and Harvard University’s Olin Institute for Strategic Studies. "Too big for business as usual" In light of history, it’s not | 10/6/13 |
Iran DA - 1AR - UK RR 4Tournament: UK RR | Round: 4 | Opponent: Kentucky GR | Judge: Green, Justin Iran DA – Resolve – Ext – No LinkLegislative control makes threats credible and effectiveWaxman 13 – Matthew Waxman, Law Professor at Columbia Law School, "Constitutional Power to Threaten War: Three Points on Syria", Lawfare Blog, 9-3, http://www.lawfareblog.com/2013/09/constitutional-power-to-threaten-war-three-points-on-syria/ On the one hand, one might intuitively expect that robust democratic checks would generally No historical evidence for their argumentDiehl 6 – Paul F. Diehl, Henning Larson Professor of Political Science at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and Tom Ginsburg, Professor of Law and Political Science at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, "Irrational War and Constitutional Design: A Reply to Professors Nzelibe and Yoo", Michigan Journal of International Law, Summer, 27 Mich. J. Int’l L. 1239, Lexis The second scenario is perhaps the one that concerns the authors: executive initiative that Resolve is impossible without Congressional backingHowell et al 5 Dispelling Myths of Political Resolve: A large body of work on crisis bargaining ¶ Impact defensePrefer our ev—their authors continuously inflate threats More credible voices suggest otherwise. The nonprofit Arms Control Association (ACA) observed | 10/4/13 |
Iran DA - 2AC - Clay 4Tournament: Clay | Round: 4 | Opponent: Kentucky GV | Judge: Brown, Nick No resolve or unified signal—-Syria decked everythingMeng 9-30 – Rep. Grace Meng, D-NY, House Subcommittee on Middle East and North Africa, "Congress Must Affirm A Credible Military Threat Against Iran", The Jewish Week, 2013, http://www.thejewishweek.com/editorial-opinion/opinion/congress-must-affirm-credible-military-threat-against-iran In the last two weeks we have witnessed potentially historic diplomacy in the Middle East Decimated the perception of unitary use of forceTobin 13 – Jonathan S. Tobin, Senior Executive Editor of Commentary, Former Executive Editor of The Jewish Exponent, "Obama Talks From Weakness, Not Strength", Commentary Magazine, 9-22, http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2013/09/22/obama-talks-from-weakness-not-strengthsyria-iran-rouhani/ That is a conclusion that the president’s defenders reject absolutely. They claim that whatever Obama can still threaten force because Iran doesn’t know Congress won’t approve it—-that’s 100 effectiveDiehl 6 – Paul F. Diehl, Henning Larson Professor of Political Science at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and Tom Ginsburg, Professor of Law and Political Science at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, "Irrational War and Constitutional Design: A Reply to Professors Nzelibe and Yoo", Michigan Journal of International Law, Summer, 27 Mich. J. Int’l L. 1239, Lexis The second scenario is perhaps the one that concerns the authors: executive initiative that No Iran threat or prolifCarpenter, 12 (Ted Galen – senior fellow at the Cato Institute, April 12, "The Pernicious Myth That Iran Can’t Be Deterred", CATO Institute, http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/pernicious-myth-iran-cant-be-deterred) Rumblings about possible war with Iran have grown louder in Washington and other Western capitals | 10/6/13 |
Iran DA - 2AC - Clay 6Tournament: Clay | Round: 6 | Opponent: Wake MS | Judge: Barouch Won’t pass- health care negotiations failNick Chiles is a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist and New York Times bestselling author. He has written or co-written 11 books and won over a dozen major journalism awards during a journalism career that brought him to the Dallas Morning News, the Star-Ledger of New Jersey and New York Newsday, in addition to serving as Editor-in-Chief of Odyssey Couleur travel magazine. 10-2-2013 http://atlantablackstar.com/2013/10/02/debt-ceiling-looming-stubbornness-congress-spell-economic-catastrophe/-http://atlantablackstar.com/2013/10/02/debt-ceiling-looming-stubbornness-congress-spell-economic-catastrophe/ House Republicans have shut down the federal government with the bizarre demand that President Obama Shutdown causes chaos for debt ceiling and thumps the econ impactA shutdown would have serious implications for the American economy, which is still struggling No impact- prioritizationRomina Boccia is the Grover M. Hermann Fellow in Federal Budgetary Affairs in the Thomas A. Roe Institute for Economic Policy Studies at The Heritage Foundation., 9-18-2013 http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2013/09/debt-limit-options-and-the-way-forward-http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2013/09/debt-limit-options-and-the-way-forward If Congress does not raise the debt limit by mid-October, the Treasury No econ decline war – recession disprovesDrezner ’12 (Daniel W. Drezner, Professor, The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Tufts University, "The Irony of Global Economic Governance: The System Worked," http://www.globaleconomicgovernance.org/wp-content/uploads/IR-Colloquium-MT12-Week-5_The-Irony-of-Global-Economic-Governance.pdf-http://www.globaleconomicgovernance.org/wp-content/uploads/IR-Colloquium-MT12-Week-5_The-Irony-of-Global-Economic-Governance.pdf, October 2012) The final outcome addresses a dog that hasn’t barked: the effect of the Great | 10/6/13 |
Iran DA - 2AC - Clay 6Tournament: Clay | Round: 6 | Opponent: Wake MS | Judge: Barouch No resolve or unified signal—-Syria decked everythingMeng 9-30 – Rep. Grace Meng, D-NY, House Subcommittee on Middle East and North Africa, "Congress Must Affirm A Credible Military Threat Against Iran", The Jewish Week, 2013, http://www.thejewishweek.com/editorial-opinion/opinion/congress-must-affirm-credible-military-threat-against-iran In the last two weeks we have witnessed potentially historic diplomacy in the Middle East. One hopes that this yields a Decimated the perception of unitary use of forceTobin 13 – Jonathan S. Tobin, Senior Executive Editor of Commentary, Former Executive Editor of The Jewish Exponent, "Obama Talks From Weakness, Not Strength", Commentary Magazine, 9-22, http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2013/09/22/obama-talks-from-weakness-not-strengthsyria-iran-rouhani/ That is a conclusion that the president’s defenders reject absolutely. They claim that whatever Obama can still threaten force because Iran doesn’t know Congress won’t approve it—-that’s 100 effectiveDiehl 6 – Paul F. Diehl, Henning Larson Professor of Political Science at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and Tom Ginsburg, Professor of Law and Political Science at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, "Irrational War and Constitutional Design: A Reply to Professors Nzelibe and Yoo", Michigan Journal of International Law, Summer, 27 Mich. J. Int’l L. 1239, Lexis The second scenario is perhaps the one that concerns the authors: executive initiative that Conflicting signals inevitable—-formal checks irrelevantWaxman 13 – Matthew Waxman, Law Professor at Columbia Law School, "The Most Puzzling Line of the President’s Speech", Lawfare Blog, 9-11, http://www.lawfareblog.com/2013/09/the-most-puzzling-line-of-the-presidents-speech/ I recently posted my new paper on The Constitutional Power to Threaten War (forthcoming | 10/6/13 |
Iran DA - 2AC - UK RR 4Tournament: UK RR | Round: 4 | Opponent: Kentucky GR | Judge: Green, Justin Opposition crushes negotations now —- their authorWaxman 13 – Matthew Waxman, professor of law at Columbia Law School and an adjunct senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations. He previously served as principal deputy director of policy planning (2005–7) and acting director of policy planning (2007) at the US Department of State, 1/28/13, Executive-Congressional Relations and National Security, www.advancingafreesociety.org/the-briefing/executive-congressional-relations-and-national-security/ The last four years should have been a good period for executive-congressional relations Congress would easily authorize force —- makes negotiations effectiveTroyan 13 – Mary Orndorff Troyan, Reporter at Gannett Washington Bureau, "Graham: Congress Should Approve Military Strike Against Iran", WLTX, 7-18, http://www.wltx.com/news/article/242923/2/Graham-Congress-Should-Approve-Military-Strike-Against-Iran Congress would authorize President Barack Obama to use military force to stop Iran’s nuclear weapons Only formal authorization makes negotiation work —- outweighs downside riskO’Hanlon 13 – Michael O’Hanlon, Senior Fellow at the Brookings Institution and Marvin Kalb, James Clark Welling Presidential Fellow at The George Washington University and Edward R. Murrow Professor Emeritus at Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government, "The Role Congress Should Play on Iran", Politico, 6-23, http://www.brookings.edu/research/opinions/2013/06/23-role-congress-should-play-iran-ohanlon-kalb Congress needs to take up the Iran issue. (It may in the course Syria thumps —- Obama got rejectedWeisman 13 – Jonathan Weisman, "Obama Delays Syria Strike to Focus on a Russian Plan", New York Times, 9-11, http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/11/world/middleeast/syrian-chemical-arsenal.html?pagewanted=all President Obama, facing implacable opposition to a strike against Syria in Congress and throughout the country, said Tuesday that he would hold off on military action for now and pursue a Russian proposal for international monitors to take over and destroy Syria’s arsenal of chemical weapons. Triggers the linkAlterman 13 – Jon Alterman, CSIS Global Security Chair and Middle East Program Director, 9/4/13, US-Iran Nuclear Deal Hinges On Syria Vote, www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2013/09/us-iran-nuclear-deal-hinges-on-syria-vote.html Focusing solely on events in Syria, however, misses a large part of the No Iran threat or prolifCarpenter, 12 (Ted Galen – senior fellow at the Cato Institute, April 12, "The Pernicious Myth That Iran Can’t Be Deterred", CATO Institute, http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/pernicious-myth-iran-cant-be-deterred) Rumblings about possible war with Iran have grown louder in Washington and other Western capitals Conflicting signals inevitable—-formal checks irrelevantWaxman 13 – Matthew Waxman, Law Professor at Columbia Law School, "The Most Puzzling Line of the President’s Speech", Lawfare Blog, 9-11, http://www.lawfareblog.com/2013/09/the-most-puzzling-line-of-the-presidents-speech/ I recently posted my new paper on The Constitutional Power to Threaten War (forthcoming | 10/4/13 |
Iran DA - 2AC -UK RR 2Tournament: UK RR | Round: 2 | Opponent: Michigan AP | Judge: Hardy Opposition crushes negotations now —- their authorWaxman 13 – Matthew Waxman, professor of law at Columbia Law School and an adjunct senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations. He previously served as principal deputy director of policy planning (2005–7) and acting director of policy planning (2007) at the US Department of State, 1/28/13, Executive-Congressional Relations and National Security, www.advancingafreesociety.org/the-briefing/executive-congressional-relations-and-national-security/ The last four years should have been a good period for executive-congressional relations Congress would easily authorize force —- makes negotiations effectiveTroyan 13 – Mary Orndorff Troyan, Reporter at Gannett Washington Bureau, and#34;Graham: Congress Should Approve Military Strike Against Iranand#34;, WLTX, 7-18, http://www.wltx.com/news/article/242923/2/Graham-Congress-Should-Approve-Military-Strike-Against-Iran Congress would authorize President Barack Obama to use military force to stop Iran’s nuclear weapons Only formal authorization makes negotiation work —- outweighs downside riskO’Hanlon 13 – Michael O’Hanlon, Senior Fellow at the Brookings Institution and Marvin Kalb, James Clark Welling Presidential Fellow at The George Washington University and Edward R. Murrow Professor Emeritus at Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government, and#34;The Role Congress Should Play on Iranand#34;, Politico, 6-23, http://www.brookings.edu/research/opinions/2013/06/23-role-congress-should-play-iran-ohanlon-kalb Congress needs to take up the Iran issue. (It may in the course No Iran threat or prolifCarpenter, 12 (Ted Galen – senior fellow at the Cato Institute, April 12, and#34;The Pernicious Myth That Iran Can’t Be Deterredand#34;, CATO Institute, http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/pernicious-myth-iran-cant-be-deterred) Rumblings about possible war with Iran have grown louder in Washington and other Western capitals Conflicting signals inevitable—-formal checks irrelevantWaxman 13 – Matthew Waxman, Law Professor at Columbia Law School, and#34;The Most Puzzling Line of the President’s Speechand#34;, Lawfare Blog, 9-11, http://www.lawfareblog.com/2013/09/the-most-puzzling-line-of-the-presidents-speech/ I recently posted my new paper on The Constitutional Power to Threaten War (forthcoming Concludes AffZeisberg 4 ~Mariah Zeisberg, PhD in Politics from Princeton, Postdoc Research Associate at the Political Theory Project of Brown University; and#34;INTERBRANCH CONFLICT AND CONSTITUTIONAL MAINTENANCE: THE CASE OF WAR POWERSand#34;; June 2004; found in Word document, can be downloaded from www.brown.edu/Research/ppw/files/Zeisberg20Ch5.doc-http://www.brown.edu/Research/ppw/files/Zeisberg Ch5.doc~ Of course, the President obviously does not win when the Congress actually acts to No capabilities for strikesWalt, 12 (Stephen M., Robert and Renée Belfer professor of international relations at Harvard University, and#34;Top ten media failures in the Iran war debate,and#34; http://walt.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2012/03/11/top_ten_media_failures_in_the_iran_war_debate-http://walt.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2012/03/11/top_ten_media_failures_in_the_iran_war_debate) ~237: Exaggerating Israel’s capabilities. In a very real sense, this whole | 10/4/13 |
Iran DA - 2AC Cards - GSU DoublesTournament: GSU | Round: Doubles | Opponent: Wake HS | Judge: Cohn, Paul, Kall Opposition crushes negotations now —- their authorWaxman 13 – Matthew Waxman, professor of law at Columbia Law School and an adjunct senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations. He previously served as principal deputy director of policy planning (2005–7) and acting director of policy planning (2007) at the US Department of State, 1/28/13, Executive-Congressional Relations and National Security, www.advancingafreesociety.org/the-briefing/executive-congressional-relations-and-national-security/ The last four years should have been a good period for executive-congressional relations in the areas AND Congress would easily authorize force —- makes negotiations effectiveTroyan 13 – Mary Orndorff Troyan, Reporter at Gannett Washington Bureau, "Graham: Congress Should Approve Military Strike Against Iran", WLTX, 7-18, http://www.wltx.com/news/article/242923/2/Graham-Congress-Should-Approve-Military-Strike-Against-Iran Congress would authorize President Barack Obama to use military force to stop Iran’s nuclear weapons Only formal authorization makes negotiation work —- outweighs downside riskO’Hanlon 13 – Michael O’Hanlon, Senior Fellow at the Brookings Institution and Marvin Kalb, James Clark Welling Presidential Fellow at The George Washington University and Edward R. Murrow Professor Emeritus at Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government, "The Role Congress Should Play on Iran", Politico, 6-23, http://www.brookings.edu/research/opinions/2013/06/23-role-congress-should-play-iran-ohanlon-kalb Congress needs to take up the Iran issue. (It may in the course | 9/29/13 |
Iran Deal Politics - 1AR - CSUF 3Tournament: CSUF | Round: 3 | Opponent: Michigan KK | Judge: Gannon, Seth Iran Sanctions – UQ vs. UofMWill override the veto- no PC to make threat credible or keep Dems on boardThe White House issued a rare veto threat in response to a bipartisan Senate bill -cosponsors signing upFox News, 12-20-2013 http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/12/20/obama-facing-hill-rebellion-on-iran-sanctions/-http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/12/20/obama-facing-hill-rebellion-on-iran-sanctions/ President Obama is facing a growing insurrection on Capitol Hill over Iran sanctions legislation, MomentumU.S. senators pushing a bill to slap new sanctions on Iran if Graham confidentPress TV, 12-21-2014 http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/12/21/341142/senate-hawks-we-override-iran-bill-veto/-http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/12/21/341142/senate-hawks-we-override-iran-bill-veto/ Despite a veto threat from US President Barack Obama, hawkish senators in Congress say AT: Won’t Pass – LindsayVeto override likely- low approval ratings, Iran leaks- your authorLindsay, 11/25/13 - Senior Vice President, Director of Studies, and Maurice R. Greenberg Chair at the Council on Foreign Relations (James, "Will Congress Overrule Obama’s Iran Nuclear Deal?" http://blogs.cfr.org/lindsay/2013/11/25/will-congress-overrule-obamas-iran-nuclear-deal/?utm_source=feedburner26utm_medium=feed26utm_campaign=Feed3A+jlindsay+28James+M.+Lindsay3A+The+Water27s+Edge29-http://blogs.cfr.org/lindsay/2013/11/25/will-congress-overrule-obamas-iran-nuclear-deal/?utm_source=feedburner26utm_medium=feed26utm_campaign=Feed3A+jlindsay+28James+M.+Lindsay3A+The+Water27s+Edge29) One reason Obama should be able to make a veto stick is party loyalty. AT: Won’t Pass – Reid Blocks Vote (Tobin)Reid can’t block a vote – already has too many cosponsorsThink Progress, 1-6-2014 http://thinkprogress.org/security/2014/01/06/3122551/crocker-experts-senate-iran-sanctions-bill/-http://thinkprogress.org/security/2014/01/06/3122551/crocker-experts-senate-iran-sanctions-bill/ After various avenues to put forth Iran sanctions measures recently failed, Sens. Robert Deal failIran is developing new centrifuges – prove they’ll cheat and Obama PC won’t be successfulSherman Frederick is a columnist for Stephens Media. He writes on general interest topics. His column appears Sunday in the Viewpoints/Opinion section of the Review-Journal. 12-28-2013 http://www.reviewjournal.com/columns-blogs/sherman-frederick/iran-and-obama-curse President Barack Obama has the Midas touch in reverse when it comes to foreign relations Ext. Obamacare ThumperObamacare makes PC ineffective- hurts job approvalJoseph Weber, Fox News, 1-1-2014 http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/01/01/after-rough-year-obama-looks-for-2014-comeback-amid-some-unsolicited-new-year/-http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/01/01/after-rough-year-obama-looks-for-2014-comeback-amid-some-unsolicited-new-year/ However, Obama’s political power began to wane soon after, starting with his failed Health care issues going to get worse- Jan 1st deadlineStar Tribune, 12-15-2013 http://www.startribune.com/lifestyle/health/235930561.html-http://www.startribune.com/lifestyle/health/235930561.html Americans who already have health insurance are blaming President Barack Obama’s health care overhaul for Israel Strikes DA – Ext – No StrikesZero chance—-newest evAhren 13 – Rapheal Ahren, "Iran Knows There Is Almost No Chance Of Strike, Ex-Top Adviser Says", Times of Israel, 12-9, http://www.timesofisrael.com/iran-knows-there-is-almost-no-chance-of-strike-ex-top-adviser-says/ The interim deal reached in Geneva last month between Iran and six world powers has drastically reduced the likelihood of military intervention to thwart the rogue Iranian nuclear program, Israel’s former national security adviser said Monday | 1/7/14 |
Iran Deal Politics - 2AC - CSUF 3Tournament: CSUF | Round: 3 | Opponent: Michigan KK | Judge: Gannon, Seth 2AC v. Michigan’s VersionSenate has the support to override a veto and Obama won’t follow through – too much support for additional sanctionsJerusalem Post, 12-25-2014 http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Columnists/Washington-watch-Whats-really-behind-the-new-Iran-sanctions-bill-336147-http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Columnists/Washington-watch-Whats-really-behind-the-new-Iran-sanctions-bill-336147 The White House has threatened to veto the bill but with the strong support of Deal failure inevitable- CongressThe Obama administration is working toward a possible deal with Iran and the European Union -IranJoshi 13 – Shashank Joshi, Research Fellow at the Royal United Services Institute and Ph.D. Candidate in International Relations at Harvard University’s Department of Government, "Syria Could Still Blow Up in Putin’s Face", The Telegraph, 9-16, http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/shashankjoshi/100236011/syria-could-still-blow-up-in-putins-face/ The critics have two charges. The first is that the agreement, hammered out -International spoilersCNN, 11-11-2013 http://www.cnn.com/2013/11/11/opinion/frum-iran-deal/-http://www.cnn.com/2013/11/11/opinion/frum-iran-deal/ 4) America’s allies are not deferring to American leadership on this one.¶ It’s No PC to prevent Iran sanctionsJennifer Rubin 11/11 is writes the Right Turn blog for The Washington Post, "On Iran, Congress should stand with France," 11-11-13, http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2013/11/11/on-iran-congress-should-stand-with-france/-http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2013/11/11/on-iran-congress-should-stand-with-france/ DOA: 11-14-13, y2k The near-disaster at Geneva represents a foreign policy challenge for both parties. No impact to sanctions- it’s hypeWashington Free Beacon, 11-14-2013 http://freebeacon.com/house-to-senate-act-swiftly-to-pass-new-iran-sanctions/-http://freebeacon.com/house-to-senate-act-swiftly-to-pass-new-iran-sanctions/ Former U.S. officials and those on Capitol Hill slammed the White House Unilateral executive action solves the impactEric Auner, World Politics Review, 11-15-2013 www.worldpoliticsreview.com/trend-lines/13386/in-congress-obama-administration-faces-uphill-battle-on-iran-sanctions Whether or not the Obama administration can convince Congress to hold off on new sanctions Minimum wage, UI, Obamacare, NSA, debt ceiling thump the DA and winners winMSNBC, 1-6-2013 http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/obama-prepares-hit-reset President Obama returns to work this week looking to revive his second term and regain Plan solves Iran prolifSagan 6 – Scott D. Sagan, Professor of Political Science at Stanford University and Senior Fellow at the Center for International Security and Cooperation and the Freeman Spogli Institute, "How to Make Tehran Blink", Newsweek, 8-28, http://www.partnershipforglobalsecurity-archive.org/Projects20and20Publications/News/Nuclear20News/2006/830200660402PM.html Given Tehran’s defiant response to the European and American effort to constrain its nuclear program Prolif causes Israeli strikesWard 12 – Alex Ward, Masters in International Relations from Durham University, "Iran’s Nuclear Programme and the Stability of the Middle East", e-International Relations, 3-2, http://www.e-ir.info/2012/03/02/irans-nuclear-programme-and-the-stability-of-the-middle-east/ Another crucial challenge to nuclear stability theory in the region lies in the possibility of Zero chance of strikesKeck 13 – Zachary Keck, Associate Editor of The Diplomat, Assistant Editor at e-International Relations, Graduate Student in the Department of Public and International Affairs at George Mason University, "Five Reasons Israel Won’t Attack Iran", National Interest, 12-1, http://mtv.com.lb/en/News/280256 Many dismiss this talk as bluster, however. Over at Bloomberg View, for | 1/7/14 |
Iran Grabbag CP - 1AR - Wake QTournament: Wake | Round: Quarters | Opponent: Northwestern MV | Judge: Seth Gannon, Kallmyer, Brovero, Weiner, Feldman Iran’ won’t trust the CP without Congressional codificationGaouette 13 – Nicole Gaouette, Reporter at Bloomberg News, "Shutdown Undercuts Obama Defining America’s Global Role", Bloomberg News, 10-2, http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-10-02/shutdown-undercuts-obama-defining-america-s-global-role.html ’Significant Pall’ "It does cast a very significant pall over America’s credibility with Codification’s keyGrotto, 7 (March 2007, Joseph Cirincione, Senior Fellow and Director for Nuclear Policy at the Center ¶ for American Progress, Andrew Grotto, Senior National Security Analyst at the Center for American ¶ Progress, where he specializes in U.S. strategic policy and the proliferation of nuclear ¶ weapon, Center for American Progress, "Contain and Engage: A New Strategy for Resolving the Nuclear Crisis with Iran,"¶ http://www.americanprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/issues/2007/02/pdf/iran_report.pdf-http://www.americanprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/issues/2007/02/pdf/iran_report.pdf) Implementing this proposal will require changes to U.S. law and administrative practice that restrict U.S. trade with Iran and sanction foreign entities from investing in Iran’s oil infrastructure.73 Iran will not take the proposal seriously unless it perceives that United States Congress supports it. Accordingly, the Bush administration will need to work closely with Congress. Prolif is the result of politics, not lack of fear—-pressure’s counter-productive because it boosts hardlinersKorb 13 – Matthew Duss, Policy Analyst at Center for American Progress and National Security Editor for Think Progress, and Dr. Lawrence Korb, Senior Fellow at the Center for American Progress, Director of the Center for Public Policy Education, The Bookings Institution, "U.S. should Tread Lightly on Iran", Politico, 6-28, http://www.politico.com/story/2013/06/united-states-should-tread-lightly-on-iran-93545.html Unfortunately, some in Washington seem determined to repeat past mistakes that could foreclose the Formalizing the restriction through statute is key to signaling and prevents bluffingWaxman 13 – Matthew Waxman, Law Professor at Columbia Law School, "The Constitutional Power To Threaten War", Yale Law Journal, 10-1, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2316777 Even if Congress already wields informal political influence over threatened force, more potent and | 12/14/13 |
Iran Grabbag CP - 2AC - Wake 8Tournament: Wake | Round: 8 | Opponent: NU OP | Judge: Andres Gannon CP links to politicsEric Auner, World Politics Review, 11-15-2013 www.worldpoliticsreview.com/trend-lines/13386/in-congress-obama-administration-faces-uphill-battle-on-iran-sanctions A few days after sitting across from an Iranian delegation in Geneva, U. | 12/14/13 |
Iran Grabbag CP - 2AC - Wake QTournament: Wake | Round: Quarters | Opponent: Northwestern MV | Judge: Seth Gannon, Kallmyer, Brovero, Weiner, Feldman Plans unilateral CBM must come FIRST– otherwise Iran wont trust the counterplans offerJervis 13 (Robert, Adlai E. Stevenson Professor of International Affairs at Columbia University, Foreign Affairs, "Getting to Yes With Iran The Challenges of Coercive Diplomacy," February, http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/138481/robert-jervis/getting-to-yes-with-iran-http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/138481/robert-jervis/getting-to-yes-with-iran) Although the United States and its European allies are talking with Iran now, these Iran won’t trust the pledge without Congressional backingPillar 13 – Dr. Paul R. Pillar, Professor and Senior Fellow at the Center for Security Studies at Georgetown University and Nonresident Senior Fellow in Foreign Policy at the Brookings Institution, Ph.D. in Politics from Princeton University, MA in Politics from Oxford University, "Iran and the Quelling of Congressional Troublemaking", The National Interest, 10-17, http://nationalinterest.org/blog/paul-pillar/iran-the-quelling-congressional-troublemaking-9258 The administration will need Congressional cooperation to undo sanctions that were erected supposedly to induce Only plan gives Iran necessary confidence – otherwise offer not credible because they perceive congress will blockGaouette 13 – Nicole Gaouette, Reporter at Bloomberg News, "Shutdown Undercuts Obama Defining America’s Global Role", Bloomberg News, 10-2, http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-10-02/shutdown-undercuts-obama-defining-america-s-global-role.html ’Significant Pall’ "It does cast a very significant pall over America’s credibility with Informal restraint isn’t perceivedWaxman 13 – Matthew Waxman, Law Professor at Columbia Law School, "The Constitutional Power To Threaten War", Yale Law Journal, 10-1, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2316777 II. Democratic Checks on Threatened Force The previous Parts of this Article showed that | 12/14/13 |
Iran K - 2AC - Wake QTournament: Wake | Round: Quarters | Opponent: Northwestern MV | Judge: Seth Gannon, Kallmyer, Brovero, Weiner, Feldman Alt fails without changing U.S. policy—-threats cause a mutually constituted cycle of hostilityNia 11 – Mahdi Mohammad Nia, PhD, "A Holistic Constructivist Approach to Iran’s Foreign Policy", International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(4), March, http://www.ijbssnet.com/journals/Vol._2_No._43B_March_2011/31.pdf Another example about radicalization of Iran’s foreign policy in response to the West Some threats are real —- they reverse the error by ignoring themKnudsen 1 – Olav. F. Knudsen, Professor at Södertörn University College, Security Dialogue 32.3, "Post-Copenhagen Security Studies: Desecuritizing Securitization," p. 360 In the post-Cold War period, agenda-setting has been much easier Alt causes right-wing fill-in—-turns the impactLockman 4 (Zachary, Professor of Modern Middle Eastern history – NYU, Contending Visions of the Middle East: The History and Politics of Orientalism, p. 241-249) But there was a price to be paid for the gap that had opened up | 12/14/13 |
Iran Politics - 2AC - Texas DubsTournament: Texas | Round: Doubles | Opponent: Emory JS | Judge: Gramzinski, Arnett, Walters Uniqueness overwhelms the link and Obama not key – it’s a nonissue and AIPAC isn’t pushing backNational Journal, 2-3-2014 http://www.nationaljournal.com/defense/how-obama-won-the-war-on-iran-sanctions-20140202 The push for new sanctions on Iran has stalled. The Democrats who bucked President No impact to sanctions- it’s hypeWashington Free Beacon, 11-14-2013 http://freebeacon.com/house-to-senate-act-swiftly-to-pass-new-iran-sanctions/ Former U.S. officials and those on Capitol Hill slammed the White House Midterms thump the dealCNBC, 1-20-2014 http://www.cnbc.com/id/101348724 Posturing by U.S. politicians in the run-up to midterm No Israeli strike regardless of deal collapseKeck 11/28/13 Although not a member of the P5+1 itself, Israel has always loomed SOTU laundry list thumpsFox News, 1-29-2014 http://latino.foxnews.com/latino/politics/2014/01/29/obama-state-union-address-highlights/ President Barack Obama urged Congress to help restore opportunity for Americans but pledged to take | 2/10/14 |
Iran Sanctions DA - 1AR - Indiana 7Tournament: Indiana | Round: 7 | Opponent: Michigan CP | Judge: Hingstman ThuTPA thumps the DAThe Hill, 1-21-2014 http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/195858-white-house-works-to-convince-dems-to-give-obama-fast-track-on-trade The White House is making a major push to convince Congress to give the president Ext. UI ThumperObama pushing UIThe Hill, 1-15-2014 http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/195543-obama-to-congress-extend-vital-lifeline-for-unemployed President Obama urged Congress on Wednesday to "do the right thing and extend a Ext. Obamacare ThumperObamacare is the central focusThe House is scheduled to return from its year-end break on Tuesday, Iran DA – Deal Failure Inevitable – 1ARDeal failure inevitable—-CongressWP, 11-4-2013 http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2013/11/14/obamas-approaching-an-iran-deal-heres-why-congress-might-stop-it/ The Obama administration is working toward a possible deal with Iran and the European Union | 1/26/14 |
Iran Sanctions DA - 1AR - Texas 3Tournament: Texas | Round: 3 | Opponent: Georgetown ErMc | Judge: Katsulas Iran StrikesNo impactBronner 12 (Ethan, NYT Staff Reporter, 1/26/12, http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/27/world/middleeast/israelis-see-irans-threats-of-retaliation-as-bluff.html?_r=126hp) JERUSALEM — Israeli intelligence estimates, backed by academic studies, have cast doubt on AT: US War ImpactSanctions bill doesn’t force US involvmentJC 1/20/14 (jewocity is the Largest Online Jewish Business Directory, "ZOA Criticizes Sen. Feinstein For Falsely Stating Iran Sanctions Bill Allows Israel To Determine U.S. Timetable For Going To War" http://www.jewocity.com/blog/zoa-criticizes-sen-feinstein-for-falsely-stating-iran-sanctions-bill-allows-israel-to-determine-u-s-timetable-for-going-to-war/11244) The Zionist Organization of America (ZOA) has criticized Senator Dianne Feinstein (D U o/w LinkNot a chance of a vote – No PC key Shenanigans, it’s a question of Reid and ideologyMcManus, Today The most important person in the U.S.-Iran nuclear negotiations right now Sanction issue has completely stalled – AIPAC overreached and it’s not close to veto-proofNYT, 2-4-2014 http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/04/world/middleeast/potent-pro-israel-group-finds-its-momentum-blunted.html?_r=0 With neither side spoiling for a fight or ready to back down, Mr. No 21 SanctionsUnilateral executive action solves the impactEric Auner, World Politics Review, 11-15-2013 www.worldpoliticsreview.com/trend-lines/13386/in-congress-obama-administration-faces-uphill-battle-on-iran-sanctions Whether or not the Obama administration can convince Congress to hold off on new sanctions Obama can and will unilaterally lift sanctionsYochi J. Dreazen is an American reporter for Foreign Policy. He previously was a reporter for the National Journal. His area of expertise is military affairs and national security FP, 10-22-2013 http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2013/10/22/obama_could_lift_iran_sanctions_tomorrow_if_he_wanted_to Congress has spent the past three years imposing tough sanctions on Iran that are Ext. UI/Minimum Wage ThumperIt’s going to keep coming up – Obama pushing and costs PCNYT, 2-7-2014 http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/07/us/politics/senate-fails-to-advance-unemployment-extension.html The Senate failed to move forward on a three-month extension of assistance for | 2/8/14 |
Iran Sanctions DA - 2AC - Indiana 5Tournament: Indiana | Round: 5 | Opponent: Iowa HK | Judge: Vats It’s a non-issue – they pushed off the vote because of public pressureMSNBC, 1-21-2014 http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/support-new-iran-sanctions-wanes The Hill, for example, reported yesterday that House Republicans "are moving away No PC to prevent Iran sanctionsJennifer Rubin 11/11 is writes the Right Turn blog for The Washington Post, "On Iran, Congress should stand with France," 11-11-13, http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2013/11/11/on-iran-congress-should-stand-with-france/ DOA: 11-14-13, y2k The near-disaster at Geneva represents a foreign policy challenge for both parties. Plan costs Congressional willDoyle McManus award winnin journalist, columnist (for the Los Angeles Times since 1978, 7-9-2008 http://articles.latimes.com/2008/jul/09/nation/na-warpowers9 A bipartisan commission Tuesday called for a new law to require the next president Stops vote on IranKatherine Ling and Katie Howell, E26E reporters, 11-2-2010 Katherine Ling and Katie Howell, E26E reporters After Obama was inaugurated as president in 2009, House Democrats unleashed a formidable agenda No impact to sanctions- it’s hypeWashington Free Beacon, 11-14-2013 http://freebeacon.com/house-to-senate-act-swiftly-to-pass-new-iran-sanctions/ Former U.S. officials and those on Capitol Hill slammed the White House Deal failure inevitable—-CongressWP, 11-4-2013 http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2013/11/14/obamas-approaching-an-iran-deal-heres-why-congress-might-stop-it/ The Obama administration is working toward a possible deal with Iran and the European Union -IranJoshi 13 – Shashank Joshi, Research Fellow at the Royal United Services Institute and Ph.D. Candidate in International Relations at Harvard University’s Department of Government, "Syria Could Still Blow Up in Putin’s Face", The Telegraph, 9-16, http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/shashankjoshi/100236011/syria-could-still-blow-up-in-putins-face/ The critics have two charges. The first is that the agreement, hammered out Wunderthumper 1CIR, unemployment, debt ceiling, minimum wage, healthcare, Guantanmo and election thump the DAFox News, 12-27-2013 http://latino.foxnews.com/latino/politics/2013/12/27/president-obama-eyes-immigration-reform-as-top-priority-for-2014/ The last vestiges of 2013’s political wrangling officially behind him, President Barack Obama is Israel/Iran StrikesNo capabilitiesWalt, 12 (Stephen M., Robert and Renée Belfer professor of international relations at Harvard University, "Top ten media failures in the Iran war debate," http://walt.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2012/03/11/top_ten_media_failures_in_the_iran_war_debate) ~237: Exaggerating Israel’s capabilities. In a very real sense, this whole EconomyUS econ resilientRobert Johnson 1/19/13 (CFA, director of economic analysis with Morningstar, Morningstar.com, "U.S. Economy Not So Fragile After All" http://news.morningstar.com/articlenet/article.aspx?id=581616) No, the U.S. Economy Has Not Been Fragile After All¶ | 1/26/14 |
Iran Sanctions DA - 2AC - Indiana 7Tournament: Indiana | Round: 7 | Opponent: Michigan CP | Judge: Hingstman Iran DA (Michigan) – 2ACNot a chance of a vote – No PC key Shenanigans, it’s a question of Reid and ideologyMcManus, Today The most important person in the U.S.-Iran nuclear negotiations right now CIR, unemployment, debt ceiling, minimum wage, healthcare, Guantanmo and election thump the DAFox News, 12-27-2013 http://latino.foxnews.com/latino/politics/2013/12/27/president-obama-eyes-immigration-reform-as-top-priority-for-2014/ The last vestiges of 2013’s political wrangling officially behind him, President Barack Obama is Deal failure inevitable and no sanctions vote – iran will never give up nukes, different expectations about the final deal, and congress thinks they’ll cheatJennifer Rubin 1/24/14 (Washington post, "Iran negotiations ’train wreck’ ahead" http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2014/01/24/iran-negotiations-train-wreck-ahead/) The last time a liberal (Sen. Max Baucus of Montana) warned about Sanctions bill doesn’t force US involvmentJC 1/20/14 (jewocity is the Largest Online Jewish Business Directory, "ZOA Criticizes Sen. Feinstein For Falsely Stating Iran Sanctions Bill Allows Israel To Determine U.S. Timetable For Going To War" http://www.jewocity.com/blog/zoa-criticizes-sen-feinstein-for-falsely-stating-iran-sanctions-bill-allows-israel-to-determine-u-s-timetable-for-going-to-war/11244) The Zionist Organization of America (ZOA) has criticized Senator Dianne Feinstein (D Plan solves Iran prolifSagan 6 – Scott D. Sagan, Professor of Political Science at Stanford University and Senior Fellow at the Center for International Security and Cooperation and the Freeman Spogli Institute, "How to Make Tehran Blink", Newsweek, 8-28, http://www.partnershipforglobalsecurity-archive.org/Projects20and20Publications/News/Nuclear20News/2006/830200660402PM.html Given Tehran’s defiant response to the European and American effort to constrain its nuclear program Zero chance of strikesKeck 13 – Zachary Keck, Associate Editor of The Diplomat, Assistant Editor at e-International Relations, Graduate Student in the Department of Public and International Affairs at George Mason University, "Five Reasons Israel Won’t Attack Iran", National Interest, 12-1, http://mtv.com.lb/en/News/280256 Many dismiss this talk as bluster, however. Over at Bloomberg View, for | 1/26/14 |
Iran Sanctions DA - 2AC - Texas 3Tournament: Texas | Round: 3 | Opponent: Georgetown ErMc | Judge: Katsulas Uniqueness overwhelms the link and Obama not key – it’s a nonissue and AIPAC isn’t pushing backNational Journal, 2-3-2014 http://www.nationaljournal.com/defense/how-obama-won-the-war-on-iran-sanctions-20140202 The push for new sanctions on Iran has stalled. The Democrats who bucked President No PC to prevent Iran sanctionsJennifer Rubin 11/11 is writes the Right Turn blog for The Washington Post, "On Iran, Congress should stand with France," 11-11-13, http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2013/11/11/on-iran-congress-should-stand-with-france/ DOA: 11-14-13, y2k The near-disaster at Geneva represents a foreign policy challenge for both parties. Plan costs Congressional willDoyle McManus award winnin journalist, columnist (for the Los Angeles Times since 1978, 7-9-2008 http://articles.latimes.com/2008/jul/09/nation/na-warpowers9 A bipartisan commission Tuesday called for a new law to require the next president Stops vote on IranKatherine Ling and Katie Howell, E26E reporters, 11-2-2010 Katherine Ling and Katie Howell, E26E reporters After Obama was inaugurated as president in 2009, House Democrats unleashed a formidable agenda No impact to sanctions- it’s hypeWashington Free Beacon, 11-14-2013 http://freebeacon.com/house-to-senate-act-swiftly-to-pass-new-iran-sanctions/ Former U.S. officials and those on Capitol Hill slammed the White House Midterms thump the dealCNBC, 1-20-2014 http://www.cnbc.com/id/101348724 Posturing by U.S. politicians in the run-up to midterm Deal failure inevitable—- Congress, Iran cheatsJennifer Rubin 1/24/14 (Washington post, "Iran negotiations ’train wreck’ ahead" http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2014/01/24/iran-negotiations-train-wreck-ahead/) The last time a liberal (Sen. Max Baucus of Montana) warned about -International spoilersCNN, 11-11-2013 http://www.cnn.com/2013/11/11/opinion/frum-iran-deal/ 4) America’s allies are not deferring to American leadership on this one.¶ It’s AT: Losers Lose LinkLosers lose link non-unique- Obama failed on gun control and XO plan looks like a loserArkansas City Traveler, 2-3-2014 http://www.arkcity.net/opinion/columns/article_b52ac01a-8d5a-11e3-bb68-001a4bcf887a.html My fellow Americans, the state of the Barack Obama presidency is ... cautious?¶ So does UINYT, 2-7-2014 http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/07/us/politics/senate-fails-to-advance-unemployment-extension.html The Senate failed to move forward on a three-month extension of assistance for AT: Prolif ImpactDeal can’t solve prolifCNN, 11-11-2013 http://www.cnn.com/2013/11/11/opinion/frum-iran-deal/ 1) Iran remains intensely committed to achieving a nuclear weapon.¶ Iran’s new president No prolifKahl, 12 (Colin H. Kahl – Associate Professor in the Security Studies Program at Georgetown University’s Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service and Senior Fellow at the Center for a New American Security, March/April, "Not Time to Attack Iran: Why War Should Be a Last Resort", Foreign Affairs, ProQuest) Bad timing | 2/8/14 |
Israel DA - 1AR - Wake QTournament: Wake | Round: Quarters | Opponent: Northwestern MV | Judge: Seth Gannon, Kallmyer, Brovero, Weiner, Feldman Prolif causes Israel-Iran accidents—-escalatesGoldberg 12 – Jeffrey Goldberg, Bloomberg View Columnist and National Correspondent for the Atlantic, January 23, 2012, "How Iran Could Trigger Accidental Armageddon," online: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-01-24/how-iran-may-trigger-accidental-armageddon-commentary-by-jeffrey-goldberg.html The experts who study this depressing issue seem to agree that a Middle East in Israel already perceives that Obama would seek Congressional authorization for Iran strikesKramer 13 – Kramer 9/17/13 http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2013/09/17/israel-likes-its-u-s-presidents-strong-2/-http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2013/09/17/israel-likes-its-u-s-presidents-strong-2/ Martin Kramer is President of Shalem College, a new undergraduate liberal arts college in Jerusalem. An authority on contemporary Islam and Arab politics, Kramer earned his undergraduate and doctoral degrees in Near Eastern Studies from Princeton University. During a twenty-five-year academic career at Tel Aviv University, he directed the Moshe Dayan Center for Middle Eastern and African Studies. Kramer has taught as a visiting professor at Brandeis University, the University of Chicago, Cornell University, Georgetown University, and The Johns Hopkins University (SAIS). He has served as a visiting fellow at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars in Washington, The Washington Institute for Near East Policy, and Harvard University’s Olin Institute for Strategic Studies. "Too big for business as usual" In light of this history, it’s Zero link uniqueness —- their authorMalka 11 – Haim Malka is deputy director and senior fellow in the Middle East Program at CSIS "Uncertain Commitment: Israeli Assessments of US Power" csis.org/files/publication/110613_malka_CapacityResolve_Web.pdf Israelis believe the United States is projecting weakness in a region that has no mercy True for Iran and use of forceMalka 11 – Haim Malka is deputy director and senior fellow in the Middle East Program at CSIS "Uncertain Commitment: Israeli Assessments of US Power" csis.org/files/publication/110613_malka_CapacityResolve_Web.pdf Confronting Iran Most urgently, Israelis believe that the United States is not acting decisively Sufficient to cause strikesBirnbaum 13 – Ben Birnbaum, Reporter Covering Foreign Affairs for The Washington Times, "An Israeli Strike on Iran Just Got More Likely", New Republic, 9-12, http://www.newrepublic.com/article/114691/israel-strike-iran-how-obamas-syria-waffling-makes-it-more-likely John Kerry’s accidental diplomacy may have saved President Obama in Washington, but here in Syria angered Israel and projects weaknessIdriss 13 – Mohamed El-Said Idriss, Expert at the Al-Ahram Centre for Political and Strategic Studies, "Israeli Options", Al-Ahram Weekly, 10-3, http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/News/4289/19/—Israeli—-options-.aspx When Obama felt compelled to turn to the US Congress to obtain a mandate to | 12/14/13 |
Israel DA - 2AC - Wake QTournament: Wake | Round: Quarters | Opponent: Northwestern MV | Judge: Seth Gannon, Kallmyer, Brovero, Weiner, Feldman Israel already thinks the plan is U.S. policyDershowitz 13 – Alan M. Dershowitz, Professor of Law at Harvard Law School, "Obama: Get Approval From Congress on Iran Now", Haaretz, 9-5, http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-1.545430 Congressional approval for a punitive-deterrent strike against Syria’s use of chemical weapons should Relations low, including over Iran, but resilientTraiman 11-5 – Alex Traiman, Contributor to Arutz Sheva, "U.S.-Israel Ties Strained After Syria Leak, Iran Talks", Algemeiner, 2013, http://www.algemeiner.com/2013/11/05/u-s-israel-ties-strained-after-syria-leak-iran-talks/ Attitudes on Iran sanctions and the leaking of information on an Israeli airstrike in Syria No chance of strikes without U.S. supportMitnick 11 – Joshua Mitnick, Correspondent at the Christian Science Monitor, "Air Strikes Against Iran Nuclear Program? Israel Reconsiders", The Christian Science Monitor, 12-9, http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Middle-East/2011/1209/Air-strikes-against-Iran-nuclear-program-Israel-reconsiders Former Mossad chief: Iranians are sophisticated, not irrational Dagan challenged another theme often Only Iran break-out causes strikesBlair 12 – David Blair, Chief Foreign Correspondent of the Daily Telegraph, "Four Reasons Why Israel Probably Won’t Attack Iran", The Telegraph, 8-23, http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/davidblair/100177697/four-reasons-why-israel-probably-wont-attack-iran/ So was I wrong? Well, I’m going to stick my neck out and Prolif causes Israeli strikesWard 12 – Alex Ward, Masters in International Relations from Durham University, "Iran’s Nuclear Programme and the Stability of the Middle East", e-International Relations, 3-2, http://www.e-ir.info/2012/03/02/irans-nuclear-programme-and-the-stability-of-the-middle-east/ Another crucial challenge to nuclear stability theory in the region lies in the possibility of | 12/14/13 |
Korea Prolif DA - 2AC - CSUF DubsTournament: CSUF | Round: Doubles | Opponent: Kentucky GR | Judge: JP, Hardy, Lucas-Bolin South Korea supports the plan – wouldn’t respond defensivelyShorrock 13(Tim, has been contributing to The Nation since 1983 and is the author of Spies for Hire: The Secret World of Intelligence Outsourcing, The Nation, Obama’s Militaristic Tilt in Korea, August 5, http://www.thenation.com/article/175604/obamas-militaristic-tilt-korea) US deterrence low nowHeinrichs 13(Rebeccah, expert on nuclear deterrence and missile defense. She is a Visiting Fellow at The Heritage Foundation, With North Korea threat looming, US nuclear disarmament has others deciding to ’arm up’, http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2013/03/13/with-north-korea-threat-looming-us-nuclear-disarmament-has-others-deciding-to/ Rhetoric doesn’t translate into conflictLankov, 13 (Andrei Lankov – Professor at Kookmin University in Seoul and an Adjunct Research Fellow at the Australian National University, March 28, "Serious armed clash on the Korean Peninsula unlikely", East Asia Forum, http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2013/03/28/a-serious-armed-clash-on-the-korean-peninsula-is-unlikely/) If the world media is to be believed, the Korean Peninsula is now on North Korea rationalHellendorff and Kellner, 13 (Bruno Hellendorff – Research Fellow at the Group for Research and Information on Peace and Security and a PhD candidate at the Université Catholique de Louvain, Thierry Kellner – Lecturer in the Department of Political Science at the Université Libre de Bruxelles and member of the centre of Research and Teaching in International Politics, April 20, "New prospects for peace on the Korean Peninsula?", East Asia Forum, http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2013/04/20/new-prospects-for-peace-on-the-korean-peninsula/) Yet North Korea’s strategy could, paradoxically, open new prospects for peace and stability | 1/8/14 |
LawUSC K - 2AC - Clay 7Tournament: Clay | Round: 7 | Opponent: USC PV | Judge: Revelins AT: PoliticsSchmittian=== P and V are wrong – politics not schmittian – their argument is a strawpersonKleinerman, 10 Eric Posner and Adrian Vermeule begin The Executive Unbound: After¶ the Madisonian Republic Their Alt won’t solve and will re-creates dominant systems of power.Chandler ’10 In the special issue, Nicholas Kiersey and Doerthe Rosenow take direct issue with my ( ) Liberalism doesn’t cement violence – that’s too sweeping.Botwinick ’1 Agamben’s diagnosis of Nazism highlights its gnostic character by evincing how the "paradox of ( ) Law K wrong – doesn’t assume Aff’s deployed to modify the State.Colatrella ’11 Our contingent action can solve – they efface the difference between liberal and illiberal rule.Dean ’1 The study of governmentality has yet to open up the extensive discussion of authoritarian and | 11/5/13 |
LawUSCK - 1AR - Clay 7Tournament: Clay | Round: 7 | Opponent: USC PV | Judge: Revelins ConsequencesIssac, ’2 Politics, in large part, involves contests over the distribution and use of power Formal checks key – Especially for war powersDruck 12 – Judah A. Druck, J.D. Candidate at the Cornell Law School and Notes Editor at the Cornell Law Review, "Droning On: The War Powers Resolution and the Numbing Effect of Technology-Driven Warfare", Cornell Law Review, November, 98 Cornell L. Rev. 209, Lexis B. Why Existing Theories of Presidential Constraint Are No Longer Sufficient Naturally, some ====( ) Methods-based focus risks getting trapped and causing anti-politics==== Fearon 26Wendt 2K Only formal checks signal restraintDamrosch 97 – Lori Fisler Damrosch, Professor of Law at the Columbia University School of Law, "Use of Force and Constitutionalism", Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 36 Colum. J. Transnat’l L. 449, Lexis Structural-institutional explanations, on the other hand, point to features of liberal Internal SOP doesn’t check or solve signalSomin 13 – Ilya Somin, Professor of Law at George Mason University, "Hearing on ’Drone Wars: The Constitutional and Counterterrorism Implications of Targeted Killing’: Testimony before the United States Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Human Rights", April 23, http://www.law.gmu.edu/assets/files/faculty/Somin_DroneWarfare_April2013.pdf Alternatively, one can envision some kind of more extensive due process within the executive Perceived as basically the squoGoldsmith 13 – Jack Goldsmith, Henry L. Shattuck Professor at Harvard Law School, "Neil Katyal on a Drone "National Security Court" Within the Executive Branch", February 21, www.lawfareblog.com/2013/02/neal-katyal-on-a-drone-national-security-court-within-the-executive-branch/ But the real "problem" with Katyal’s proposal — beyond its possible overbreadth in Not perceived as credibleGoldsmith 13 – Jack Goldsmith, Henry L. Shattuck Professor at Harvard Law School "How Obama Undermined the War on Terror", 5-13, http://www.newrepublic.com/article/112964/obamas-secrecy-destroying-american-support-counterterrorism-http://www.newrepublic.com/article/112964/obamas-secrecy-destroying-american-support-counterterrorism For official secrecy abroad to work, the secrets must be kept at home as | 11/5/13 |
Legalism K - 1AR - CSUF 3Tournament: CSUF | Round: 3 | Opponent: Michigan KK | Judge: Gannon, Seth ( ) Law K wrong in Aff context. We solve, Alt can’’t.Grynaviski ’13 Conclusion The burden of the argument, thus far, has been to show that ( ) We don’t have to justify THE Law – just OUR rule.McCormick ’99 For Habermas, the de facto strategy of reducing all cases to "exceptions" ( ) Alt Fails – Only Aff solves.Katyal ’13 One hot summer day, following a week-long marathon of grading 130 Constitutional ( ) No, not ethics disad – consequencesIssac, ’2 | 1/7/14 |
Legalism K - 2AC - Wake 6Tournament: Wake | Round: 6 | Opponent: Georgetown AM | Judge: Brossmann ( ) Law K wrong in Aff context. We solve, Alt can’’t.Grynaviski ’13 Conclusion The burden of the argument, thus far, has been to show that Neg impact’s vague; empirically false, and Dossa exaggerates.Covenant Zone ’6 Dossa makes a living criticizing liberalism, but only pushes the gnostic tendencies of liberalism | 11/21/13 |
Lesbian Separatism K - 1AR - Harvard 5Tournament: Harvard | Round: 5 | Opponent: Wake DL | Judge: Fitzmier ConsequentialismIssac, ’2 Reps secondChurchill ’96 Excluding men and people in positions of power makes their movement worse – prefer the permLa Paglia 13 We often think of feminism as purely a women’s movement, based on the inclusion ====They throw out every reform because of fear of reformism. Turns their cause.==== D’Amato ’6 It is important to remember, however, that rejecting reformism is not the same Cant solveRitter ’13 Many students who participate in comp etitive interscholastic debate in high school and college 20 | 11/5/13 |
Lesbian Separatism K - 2AC - Harvard 5Tournament: Harvard | Round: 5 | Opponent: Wake DL | Judge: Fitzmier A-to State BadGender K of the State boosts gendered violence. Vote for the perm.Harrington ’92 The title of this chapter is a question that needs much more careful exploration by ( ) Sweeping reformism K is wrong. Increases oppression through isolation.Hahnel ’5 We need look no further than to the history of twentieth century libertarian socialism to ( ) Working from within the system can produce change. Proves solvency and addresses K of civil society.James ’9 This turns the K —- more than they turn the caseGoldstein 1 – Josh Goldstein, Professor of Int’l Relations, American University, War and Gender, p. 412 First, peace activists face a dilemma in thinking about causes of war and working | 11/5/13 |
Liberalism K - 2AC - Wake 8Tournament: Wake | Round: 8 | Opponent: NU OP | Judge: Andres Gannon ( ) Aff is a contingent reform – not liberal reformism. Means we solve and win on perm.McCormick ’99 For Habermas, the de facto strategy of reducing all cases to "exceptions" ( ) Sweeping law K doesn’t apply to our Aff – it succeeds when we create norms that restrict the commander-in-chief.Heins ’5 According to this basic Principle of Distinction, modern humanitarian action is directed towards those ( ) K of liberalism and the law is far too sweeping.Youngs ’11 This working paper offers a modest, but hopefully distinctive contribution to these debates by | 12/14/13 |
LiberalismSecurityEmory K - 1AR - UK RR 6Tournament: UK RR | Round: 6 | Opponent: Emory JS | Judge: Russell Reps Section( ) Reps NOT before policy framework – anti-politics, and no Rep impact. That’s ChurchillChurchill ’96 ConsequencesNo, not ethics disad – consequences. That’s IsaacIssac, ’2 A-to Aff advantage are contructs( ) Even if our scenarios are constructs, they’re so universally-held that actors still pragmatically react to them.Wendt ’95 PredictionsYes, predictionsKurasawa’4 PermYour author thinks coalition-building is a bigger internal link than the Alt to orientialismBatur ’99 Punishing us re-creates Orientalism – better to go with the perm and admit reps alts ALSO don’t fully solveVarisco ’7 | 10/4/13 |
LiberalismSecurityEmory K - 2AC - UK RR 6Tournament: UK RR | Round: 6 | Opponent: Emory JS | Judge: Russell ( ) Prefer policy framework. Regress – endless items become nexus questions, unfairly whisks away the 1AC. Our model best solves exceptionalism.English ’7 ( ) Their Alt NEVER solves liberalism – try or die for us.Zanetti ’97 ( ) K of liberalism and the law is far too sweeping.Youngs ’11 This working paper offers a modest, but hopefully distinctive contribution to these debates by ( ) Imperialism doesn’t make war inevitable – that oversimplifiesAmar ’11 ( ) Imperial K of science over-explains and doesn’t disprove scientific accuracy.Bronner ’4 Reclaiming the Enlightenment calls for clarifying the aims of an educated sensibility in a disenchanted ( ) Demonization of the liberal goes too far – cements the worst violence.Goodwin-Smith ’8 ( ) Our contingent action can solve – they efface the difference between liberal and illiberal rule.Dean ’1 The study of governmentality has yet to open up the extensive discussion of authoritarian and A2: Russia Threat Reps BadIt’s an exception to the K —- no "root cause"Kydd 97 – Professor of Political Science of California, Riverside, Security Studies, Autumn 1997 p. 154 As for the Second World War, few structural realists will make a sustained case Prefer evidence from BlankPirrong 9 | 10/4/13 |
Liberty K - 1AR - CSUF 6Tournament: CSUF | Round: 6 | Opponent: Liberty CE | Judge: Bankey SequencingCurriculum’s best when it starts with fiated, state-based political actionGitlin ’5 EpistemologyEpistemology not 1st and links to anti-politicsJarvis 2K Perm"Should" is desirable, not mandatoryAC 99 (Atlas Collaboration, "Use of Shall, Should, May Can," http://rd13doc.cern.ch/Atlas/DaqSoft/sde/inspect/shall.html) shall ’shall’ describes something that is mandatory. If a requirement uses ’shall’, then History proves no circumventionCarpenter 13 – Zoë Carpenter, Reporter in The Nation’s Washington, DC Bureau, "If Congress Says No, Can Obama Strike?", The Nation, 9-4, http://www.thenation.com/blog/176034/if-congress-says-no-can-obama-strike~~23 Moreover, Pelosi argued that there is precedent for a chief executive to proceed with Yancy – "Sweeping" Turn( ) Yancy makes a sweeping claim about Whiteness – must be particular or their K is counter-productive.Purcell ’8 Rana K – Alt Fails – 1ARLegal restraints meaningfully check the PresidentCole ’12 Rana’s account of the epistemological underpinnings of the national security state offers an astute and ( ) Rana’s populist Alt fails and he’s too pessimistic about current order.Simon ’12 The absence of explicit comparisons in these chapters also diminishes the force of the normative ( ) Rana’s "bottom-up political" Alt can’t solve and reifiesO’Rourke ’11 This is not to say, however, that Rana’s normative aims do not themselves ( ) Rana wrong – underestimates Law; over-estimates cultural-political pressure as an Alt.O’Rourke ’11 As Part II explains, however, it is unlikely that Rana’s normative aims can | 1/8/14 |
Liberty K - 2AC - CSUF 6Tournament: CSUF | Round: 6 | Opponent: Liberty CE | Judge: Bankey 2AC – SturExtend our 1AC Stuhr ev. K’s of Aff’s macro-political starting point don’t apply in the War Powers context. Neg’s anti-State and micro-1st stance fail. Stuhr’s next paragraph prove that WE DON’T EXCLUDE frameworks of intersectional identity – but perm’s the best option.Stuhr ’8 These and related experiences, rooted in a love of war, are not merely HeuristicThe heuristic’s impact is enormous. It includes this room, but extends beyond it.Liu ’12 We therefore invite all stakeholders in America’s future to join together to become civic agents Heuristic Solves Black FeminismOur heuristic of learning about state implementation solves black feminismAustin, 89 (Regina, Associate Professor of Law at the University of Pennsylvania and has a J.D. from the University of Pennsylvania, May/June, "SAPPHIRE BOUND21", 1989 Wis. L. Rev. 539, Lexis) Looking at legal problems against the context of non-legal perspectives has its dangers Executive Precedence2AC – FOUR LAYER FiatWe’ll house our four layers of the fiat debate here:First – there IS a slim chance we cause macro change.Grynaviski says public demand may actually cause change. Sloane proves US debates shape INTERNATIONAL practice. Neg’s pessimism’s about the USFG.We’ll may lose we don’t horizontally change law, but:Two – We’re vertical constraint through the public sphere.Lobel ’89 These changes would supplement and ultimately transform traditional separation of power restraints. The constitutional Three – Awareness. We may spur macro-change. If we don’t, our Aff still boosts awareness. This beats framework distinctions by helping the debate-space adjust to Executive practice:Young – quoting Stewart – ’13 About six months ago, my assistant debate coaches and I decided that it would be a good idea to craft a justification paper to persuade the NDT-CEDA college policy debate community to AND Overview EffectExtend Mohan – Aff boosts space travel.( ) And, travel key to Overview Effect.White ’87 ( ) Specifically key to solve race AND gender violenceHearsey ’12 The Overview Effect¶ Humans’ perceptions of their surroundings determine much of their behavior. Nommo 2AC( ) Your author concludes Nommo does not emancipate, does not dismantle dominant languages, and closes spaces for resistance for non-Nommo African-American Languages. Lynn Clarke is an Assistant Professor of Communication at Vanderbilt – Journal of Speculative Philosophy, Vol. 18, No. 4, 2004 – http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/journal_of_speculative_philosophy/v018/18.4clarkel.pdf Supported by the creative power of Nommo oriented toward African American community, the oppositional (Note: The phase "A.A.L. – internally cited – stands for "African-American Languages"). ( ) Nommo discourages black unity and cannot transcend. Lynn Clarke is an Assistant Professor of Communication at Vanderbilt – Journal of Speculative Philosophy, Vol. 18, No. 4, 2004 – http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/journal_of_speculative_philosophy/v018/18.4clarkel.pdf Returning to the question of creative powers compass Yancy’s account of Nommo raises problems here We have creative turns to black vernacular hurting black participation. This ev gives background info for our turns:Koch ’1 The purpose of the present investigation was to examine African American¶ adults’ perceptions of Reject such essentialism – even if it’s an attempt at "strategic essentialism":McLaurin ’12 Philosopher Lawrence Blum, in writing on stereotypes as a general phenomenon,¶ attempts a Master’s Tools/Master’s House CardThe master’s tools can dismantle the master’s house – assumes black feminism because it’s answering Audre Lorde State not Always Racist – WallWe’ll house the debate over whether the State is categorically racist here:Framing point ~23 1 – Universal v. particularToo sweeping to say working-through-State never counters racism – here’s 7 concrete examples:Seligman ’11 Litigation as a tool for social change has a long and proud tradition in the Framing Point ~23 2 – How we engage:*Pessimism towards progressivism inverts the error and makes racism worse. This card rules:Jones ’99 An even more troubling feature of Adorno and Horkheimer’s analysis is the downplaying of individual State Not Always Sexist – WallUSFG’s not categorically sexist and rejecting it is worse for feminist causesHarrington ’92 The title of this chapter is a question that needs much more careful exploration by A-to CRT( ) Aff is a contingent reform – not liberal reformism. Means we solve and win on perm.McCormick ’99 For Habermas, the de facto strategy of reducing all cases to "exceptions" ( ) CLS K wrong – we solve; they invite fascismMcCormick ’99 Turns to Political Ontology – Black unityWe K the whole notion of "political ontology" as it relates to race. It discourages black unity – it’s net worse.James ’10 | 1/8/14 |
Midterms - 2AC - Harvard 1Tournament: Harvard | Round: 1 | Opponent: Wayne JS | Judge: Susko Dems can’t regain the HouseNate Cohn, The New Republic, 10-22-2013 http://www.newrepublic.com/article/115288/midterms-2014-few-opportunities-democrats-http://www.newrepublic.com/article/115288/midterms-2014-few-opportunities-democrats If there’s anything I could get people to understand about the next election, it’s Too far awayMany factors nevertheless mitigate against a Democratic takeover.¶ No. 1 is time. CIR will determine the midtermsIt would obviously be a major domestic policy accomplishment for Obama’s legacy if he could | 10/26/13 |
Midterms DA - 1AR - Harvard 1Tournament: Harvard | Round: 1 | Opponent: Wayne JS | Judge: Susko Dems will still lose the House--Time, national polls don’t matter, electoral math, ObamacareDenver Nicks is an American journalist and photographer. Hailing from Oklahoma, now based in New York, Nicks’ work has appeared in The Nation, The Huffington Post, This Land, and The Daily Beast 10-23-2013 http://swampland.time.com/2013/10/23/government-shutdown-house-democrats-republicans-2014/?iid=sl-main-lead-http://swampland.time.com/2013/10/23/government-shutdown-house-democrats-republicans-2014/?iid=sl-main-lead With Republicans bearing the brunt of public anger over an unpopular government shutdown, Democrats | 10/26/13 |
NATO DA - 2AC - Harvard 1Tournament: Harvard | Round: 1 | Opponent: Wayne JS | Judge: Susko Congress would snap-approve war after an attackMcConnell 13 – Mitch McConnell, Senate Minority Leader, "McConnell Outlines His Opposition to Syria Resolution", Federal News Service, 9-10, Lexis But let’s be very clear about something. These attacks, monstrous as they are Plan’s 100 consistent with the NATO treatyFisher 00 – Louis Fisher, Senior Specialist in Separation of Powers, Congressional Research Service, The Library of Congress. Ph.D., New School for Social Research, "Point/Counterpoint: Unchecked Presidential Wars", University of Pennsylvania Law Review, May, 148 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1637, Lexis Although President Clinton claimed to be operating under the "authority" of NATO decisions NATO’s resilientBlachford, 12 (Kevin Blachford, "NATO Looks Forward", PhD student at the University of Winchester specializing in global politics and security studies, July 6, World Policy Blog, http://www.worldpolicy.org/blog/2012/07/06/nato-looks-forward-http://www.worldpolicy.org/blog/2012/07/06/nato-looks-forward) Admitting that "it’s not easy to be an optimist," Rasmussen recognized that, Fails now—-tech gapStevens, 8 (Stevens, CEO of Lockheed Martin, 7/15/2008 (Robert J., "The Current State of Transatlantic Defense Industrial Relations" Hampton Roads International Security Quarterly, Proquest) But the trends on today’s horizon are not all positive. Most worrying is the | 10/26/13 |
NDT RD 7 1AC Use of Force ActTournament: NDT | Round: 7 | Opponent: NU MV | Judge: Susko, Layron, Hall 1The United States Federal Government should require the President to receive approval from a Congressional Leadership Group for the introduction of United States Armed Forces into combat, except as explicitly delegated by the Use of Force Act. U.S. war powers are modeled internationally —- the precedent of unilateral executive authority encourages preemptive conflict in multiple hotspotsSloane 8 – Sloane, Associate Professor of Law, Boston University School of Law, 2008 (Robert, Boston University Law Review, April, 88 B.U.L. Rev. 341, Lexis) There is a great deal more constitutional history that arguably bears on the scope of Norm’s coming but not yet establishedRheinhold 12 – Dr. Theresa Rheinhold, PhD in Political Science from Tübingen University, postdoctoral research fellow at the Social Science Research Center Berlin, Dec 23 2012, Sovereignty and the Responsibility to Protect: The Power of Norms and the Norms of the Powerful, Ch 5: The Duty to Prevent, p. 148 In sum, the present case study has thrown into sharp relief the limits of Conflict’s likely in Taiwan, Georgia, and India/Pakistan —- U.S. signal’s keyRehman 12 – Fehzan Rehman, International Relations at the University of Westminster, "Analyzing America’s National Security Strategy", e-International Relations, 9-13, http://www.e-ir.info/2012/09/13/analyzing-americas-national-security-strategy/ Another implication on sovereignty, due to the NSS, was, yet again, Preemption ruins U.S. leverage to deescalate regional crises —- goes nuclearSteinberg 2 – James B. Steinberg, Vice President and Director of Foreign Policy at the Brookings Institution, Michael E. O’Hanlon and Susan E. Rice, "The New National Security Strategy and Preemption", Brookings Policy Brief Series, December, http://www.brookings.edu/research/papers/2002/12/terrorism-ohanlon The Dangers of Legitimating Preemption Only formal, structural checks restrain preemptionDamrosch 97 – Lori Fisler Damrosch, Professor of Law at the Columbia University School of Law, "Use of Force and Constitutionalism", Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 36 Colum. J. Transnat’l L. 449, Lexis Structural-institutional explanations, on the other hand, point to features of liberal 2Accidents and miscalc are inevitable under unitary war powers—-both escalateAdler 8 – David Gray, Professor of Political Science at Idaho State University, "The Judiciary and Presidential Power in Foreign Affairs: A Critique", 6-1, http://www.freerangethought.com/index.php?option=com_content26task=blogsection26id=626Itemid=41 ~{11~} The structure of shared powers in foreign relations serves to deter abuse Accidents are inevitable because of spoofing and hair-trigger misperception—-causes extinction, but Congressional approval solvesScarry 14 – Elaine Scarry, Professor of Aesthetics and the General Theory of Value at Harvard University, Interview in American Reader, 2-27, http://theamericanreader.com/on-thermonuclear-monarchy-an-interview-with-elaine-scarry/ SG: Would you say that we’re presently in a state of emergency, considering the number of nuclear warheads that the U.S. and other countries have collectively, and the fact that the power to launch those warheads in the U.S. is held solely by the president? Executive war power structurally ensures groupthink and escalatory interventionsFleischman 10 – Matthew Fleischman, J.D. Candidate at New York University School of Law, "A Functional Distribution of War Powers", New York University Journal of Legislation and Public Policy, 13 N.Y.U. J. Legis. 26 Pub. Pol’y 137, Lexis While Nzelibe and Yoo’s model is clearly plausible, it misses certain critical institutional constructs Intervention escalates—-Congress solvesFriedman 11 – George Friedman, President of Stratfor Global Forecasting, "What Happened to the American Declaration of War?", Stratfor, 3-29, http://www.stratfor.com/weekly/20110328-what-happened-american-declaration-war An Increasing Tempo of Operations Requiring prior Congressional authorization for war deters adventurismBacevich 13 – Andrew, Professor of History and International Relations at Boston University and Ph.D. in American Diplomatic History from Princeton University, The New American Militarism, p. 205-210 There is, wrote H. L. Mencken, "always a well- The process makes conflict less likely, regardless of Congress’ responseGrynaviski 13 – Eric Grynaviski, Professor of Political Science at The George Washington University, "The Bloodstained Spear: Public Reason and Declarations of War", International Theory, 5(2), Cambridge Journals Conclusion The burden of the argument, thus far, has been to show that no 3Japan models Congress on war powers—must be formal legislation I. Introduction I?Introduction It is not within the authority of the executive to mandate interpretations of the Constitution (Reuters) - Japan is likely to start considering acquiring the Push coming nowSeig 3-25 – Linda Seig, Reporter at AP, "Abe faces push-back in aim to free Japan military from constitution", GMA News, 2014, http://www.gmanetwork.com/news/story/353982/news/world/abe-faces-push-back-in-aim-to-free-japan-military-from-constitution-http://www.gmanetwork.com/news/story/353982/news/world/abe-faces-push-back-in-aim-to-free-japan-military-from-constitution Abe has made clear he will press on with changes to free the military from the constraints of the pacifist constitution, but members of his own party are urging caution and his coalition partner is dubious about the wisdom of the historic - and unpopular - change. Japan has begun to play a more vigorous role in East Asia’s security affairs, One of the most dangerous international disputes that the United States could get dragged into The real question is not what China and South Korea will do in response to Even with USFK in Korea, issues from the region’s long and often confrontational history 4"Use of Force" framework spurs compliance by building Congressional expertise and delineating clear areas of Presidential authorityShane 14 – Peter M. Shane, Davis Chair in Law at the Ohio State University Moritz College of Law, JD from Yale Law, Former Dean of the Law School at the University of Pittsburgh, "Constitutionalism and War Making", Texas Law Review, February, http://www.texaslrev.com/wp-content/uploads/Shane.pdf IV. Can a Legally Informed Interbranch Negotiation Practice Be Institutionalized? Plan builds in a point of order—-deters circumventionMitchell 9 – Jonathan, Assistant Professor of Law at the George Mason University School of Law, "Legislating Clear-Statement Regimes in National-Security Law", Georgia Law Review, Summer, 43 Ga. L. Rev. 1059, Lexis b. point-of-order mechanisms Congress must be the first moverHansen 9 – Hansen and Friedman, professors of law at the New England School of Law, 2009 (Victor and Lawrence, The Case for Congress: Separation of Powers and the War on Terror, p.130) The problem, of course, is that much of this congressional involvement has come | 3/30/14 |
NDT RD 7 2AC CP CommitteeTournament: NDT | Round: 7 | Opponent: NU MV | Judge: Susko, Layron, Hall Committee oversight failsBlumrosen 8 – Alfred W. Blumrosen, Professor of Law Emeritus, Rutgers Law School, "Baker-Christopher Proposal of 2008 Violates the Constitutional Requirement that Congress Declare War", http://www.warpower.us/090101_Comment_Baker-Christopher.pdf
It’s only an ex post check—-that failsLemieux 14 – Jason Lemieux, Master of International Affairs from Columbia University, Former Member of the US Marine Corps, "Replacing the War Powers Act", 1-22, http://jasonlemieux.com/2014/01/22/replacing-the-war-powers-act/ In the event of good-faith implementation, the bill’s initial requirement for an executive "consultation" with a joint congressional committee may not deter the executive if the committee lacks the authority to deny a use of force. President won’t comply and there’s no enforcementStevenson 8 – Charles A. Stevenson, Professor of National Security Policy at the National War College, "Congress in Retreat on War Powers Reform", Boston Globe, 7-11, http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2008/07/11/congress_in_retreat_on_war_powers_reform/ What’s worse, their recommended substitute for the 1973 war powers law would make it even easier for presidents to begin and continue military operations opposed by a majority of Congress and the American people. Links to politics By contrast, chapter 2 argues that all of these actions, both formal and Obama is the Velcro president – everything sticksNicholas and Hook 10. (Peter and Janet, Staff Writers – LA Times, "Obama the Velcro president", LA Times, 7-30, http://articles.latimes.com/2010/jul/30/nation/la-na-velcro-presidency-20100730/3-http://articles.latimes.com/2010/jul/30/nation/la-na-velcro-presidency-20100730/3) If Ronald Reagan was the classic Teflon president, Barack Obama is made of Velcro | 3/30/14 |
NDT RD 7 2AC Miscalc AdvTournament: NDT | Round: 7 | Opponent: NU MV | Judge: Susko, Layron, Hall MiscalcInternal checks don’t solveHLR 12 – Harvard Law Review 12, "Developments in the Law: Presidential Authority," Vol. 125:2057, www.harvardlawreview.org/media/pdf/vol125_devo.pdf-http://www.harvardlawreview.org/media/pdf/vol125_devo.pdf Political checks thus can work to restrain the President by prompting executive self-binding Terrorst spoofing causes global nuclear war—-Congress solvesBlumrosen 11 – Alfred W. Blumrosen, Professor Emeritus at the Rutgers School of Law and Steven M. Blumrosen, J.D., Quinnipiac University School of Law, "Restoring the Congressional Duty to Declare War", Rutgers Law Review, Winter, 63 Rutgers L. Rev. 407, Lexis Conclusion | 3/30/14 |
NDT RD 7 2AC PTX Patent ReformTournament: NDT | Round: 7 | Opponent: NU MV | Judge: Susko, Layron, Hall No patent DA – Obama’s not pushing, won’t pass and legislation doesn’t solve trollsRichard Lloyd, IAM Magazine, 2-27-2014 http://www.iam-magazine.com/blog/Detail.aspx?g=a3dd8510-5551-4070-9ef1-3beb0470a94a-http://www.iam-magazine.com/blog/Detail.aspx?g=a3dd8510-5551-4070-9ef1-3beb0470a94a One week on from the White House’s announcement that it was taking a number of No impact – patent trolls are hype – best studies on the issueMerritt, EE Times, 3-12-14 Rick, "Patent Data Missing in Troll Debate" http://www.eetimes.com/document.asp?doc_id=1321364and_mc=MP_IW_EDT_STUB, accessed 3-15-14 While the US Congress debates legislation aimed at addressing a troubling increase in patent infringement Legislation not key – Court and FTC solveSusanne M. Hopkins is a partner in Vorys’ Cleveland and Washington, D.C., offices and a member of the firm’s technology and intellectual property group. 3-18-2014 http://www.crainscleveland.com/article/20140318/BLOGS05/140319786-http://www.crainscleveland.com/article/20140318/BLOGS05/140319786 For patent trolls, the end may be near — and good riddance. After Doesn’t solve innovation – the Senate bill is insufficientAdi Kamdar at the Electronic Frontier Foundation specializing in patent, free speech, intermediary liability, and consumer privacy issues 3-20-2014 https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/03/thousands-speak-out-favor-strong-patent-reform-senate-https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/03/thousands-speak-out-favor-strong-patent-reform-senate The Innovation Act was a great start and passed the House with overwhelming bipartisan support Ukraine, jobless benefits, Obamacare and budget thumpJamie Dupree is the Radio News Director of the Washington Bureau of the Cox Media Group and writes the Washington Insider blog. 3-23-2014 http://www.wsbradio.com/weblogs/jamie-dupree/2014/mar/23/congress-back-three-week-session/-http://www.wsbradio.com/weblogs/jamie-dupree/2014/mar/23/congress-back-three-week-session/ After a week back home, the House and Senate return to legislative business on Ideology outweighs and no spilloverEdwards 3 – George C. Edwards, Distinguished Professor of Political Science at Texas A26M University and Former Director of the Center for Presidential Studies, "Riding High in the Polls: George W. Bush and Public Opinion", www.clas.ufl.edu/users/rconley/conferencepapers/Edwards.PDF-http://www.clas.ufl.edu/users/rconley/conferencepapers/Edwards.PDF Passing legislation was even more difficult on the divisive domestic issues that remained on Congress’s War powers backlash nowNelson, 9/5 (Colleen, 9/5/2013, "Obama’s Curbs on Executive Power Draw Fire," http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323893004579057463262293446.html-http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323893004579057463262293446.html)) President Barack Obama, who pledged to push his second-term domestic agenda through executive actions when Congress wouldn’t cooperate, has moved in the opposite direction on international affairs in recent months as he created new checks on executive authority. PC isn’t key and winners winHirsh 2-7 – Michael, Senior Editor at Newsweek Magazine and Chief Correspondent for the National Journal, "There’s No Such Thing as Political Capital", National Journal, 2013, Lexis On Tuesday, in his State of the Union address, President Obama will do No impact to deterrence and the U.S. will misuse it anyway—misunderstanding about the concept, faulty threat assessmetns, forgetfulness about history, shortsighted policymakingBetts, 13 (Richard K. – Director of the Saltzman Institute of War and Peace Studies at Columbia University and Adjunct Senior Fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, March/April, "The Lost Logic of Deterrence: What the Strategy That Won the Cold War Can-and Can’t-Do Now", Foreign Affairs 92.2, ProQuest) Deterrence isn’t what it used to be. In the second half of the twentieth century, it was the backbone of U.S. national security. Its purpose, logic, and effectiveness were well understood. It was the essential military strategy behind containing the Soviet Union and a crucial ingredient in winning the Cold War without fighting World War III. But in recent decades, deterrence has gone astray, and U.S. defense policy is worse for the change. Immigration thumps the DAPolitico, 3-26-2014 http://www.politico.com/story/2014/03/barack-obama-democrats-immigration-105047.html-http://www.politico.com/story/2014/03/barack-obama-democrats-immigration-105047.html President Barack Obama formally endorsed a long-shot legislative gambit from House Democrats aimed Obama spending PC on minimum wageUSA Today, 3-20-2014 http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2014/03/20/obama-women-economics-wage-gap/6626793/-http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2014/03/20/obama-women-economics-wage-gap/6626793/ President Obama heads to Orlando on Thursday to kick off a multi-city push Econ issues thumpKevin Chupka, Yahoo Finance, 3-11-2014, http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/breakout/is-president-obama-becoming-a-two-term-version-of-president-jimmy-carter-114927089.html-http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/breakout/is-president-obama-becoming-a-two-term-version-of-president-jimmy-carter-114927089.html The ongoing crisis in Russia and Ukraine has, for some, highlighted deficiencies in MARKED | 3/30/14 |
NDT RD 7 2AC SOP AdvTournament: NDT | Round: 7 | Opponent: NU MV | Judge: Susko, Layron, Hall Obama embraced the Bush DoctrineFeaver 13 The Obama Administration has embraced the Bush doctrine, or at least the preemption part Tea party makes Democrat victory likelyDSCC 13 (Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, "GOP TEA PARTY PRIMARY-PALOOZA: Colorado", http://www.dscc.org/pressrelease/gop-tea-party-primary-palooza-colorado-http://www.dscc.org/pressrelease/gop-tea-party-primary-palooza-colorado, 8/15/13) Newest analysis about the midterms provesTwo weeks from today, the first of at least six Republican primaries featuring establishment It’s reversibleOstermueller 6 – Daniel Ostermueller, "Preemptive War: The International Context and a Case for Peace", http://lsawarchives.lib.lehigh.edu/viewarticle.php?id=52226layout=html However, the two often cited international instigators, North Korea’s Kim Jung-Il | 3/30/14 |
Nietzsche K 2AC - GSU Round 2Tournament: GSU | Round: 2 | Opponent: Michigan CH | Judge: Severson K – 2ACForced danger makes elective insecurity impossibleBooth 7 – Dr. Kenneth, Professor of International Relations at the University of Aberystwyth, Theory of World Security, p. 104-105) Perhaps the most hideous image of the congruity of insecurity and the determined life in Life is always valuableTorchia 2, Professor of Philosophy, Providence College, Phd in Philosophy, Fordham College (Joseph, and#34;Postmodernism and the Persistent Vegetative State,and#34; The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly Summer 2002, Vol. 2, No. 2, http://www.lifeissues.net/writers/torc/torc_01postmodernismandpvs1.html-http://www.lifeissues.net/writers/torc/torc_01postmodernismandpvs1.html) Ultimately, Aquinas’ theory of personhood requires a metaphysical explanation that is rooted in an Congressional check’s key to stop preemption —- rejection without a mechanism failsBacevich 7 Evaluate using particularity—-no and#34;root causeand#34; or sweeping takeouts to our specific claimsPRICE ’98 One of the central departures of critical international theory from positivism is the view that Suffering and insecurity not inevitable- their argument confuses frustration with suffering | 10/4/13 |
Nietzschean Security K - 1AR - USC 6Tournament: USC | Round: 6 | Opponent: OU LW | Judge: Guevara, Omar Yes threats – accidentsHair trigger alert ensures full-scale nuclear war within minutesMintz 1 – Morton Mintz, 2001 ~former chair of the Fund for Investigative Journalism and a former Washington Post reporter, The American Prospect, Two Minutes to Launch, http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=two_minutes_to_launch-http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=two_minutes_to_launch~~ Hair-trigger alert means this: The missiles carrying those warheads are armed and Yes threats – R2PThreat’s real—-cognitive biases downplay the Russian threatBlank 5 – Stephen Blank, Professor at the Strategic Studies Institute at the U.S. Army War College, "Is Russia a Democracy and Does It Matter?", World Affairs, 167(3), Winter, Jstor Recently, several analysts have argued that Russia is "a normal country" just Pre-Fiat Wrong( ) We’ll indict "pre-fiat" args – they mask that macro-politics shapes the local more than vice-versa.Ebert ’5 Yes, value to life( ) Yes, value to lifeCoontz’1 Hidden Disad – MoralityNo, not ethics disad – consequences. That’s IsaacOR:Issac, ’2 SufferingSuffering is not inevitable—it is the exception, not the rule.Alex Knapp, Editor-in-Chief of Heretical Ideas—a webzine devoted to in-depth examination of opinions, ideas, and culture, B.S. in Biochemistry from Worcester Polytechnic Institute, J.D. from the University of Kansas, 2009 From the basic Buddhist tenet that life is suffering to Medieval Christian idea that we suffer on Earth to receive rewards in Methods Not First====( ) Methods-based focus risks getting trapped and causing anti-politics==== Fearon 26Wendt 2K 2AC( ) Action not always fail – pessimism bias and alts more dangerous.Tallis ’97 If we deny or rubbish the progress that mankind has already made, and at Nietzsche K – Elective Insecurity – 1ARPeople should be allowed the CHOICE of deciding for themselves how to determine their own approach to life. Foreclosing this IS a denial of life—should be rejectedHamilton, Lecturer in Philosophy of Religion Lecturer at Kings College, London, 2000 (Christopher, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice. v3, p. 192) | 1/4/14 |
Nietzschean Security K - 2AC - USC 6Tournament: USC | Round: 6 | Opponent: OU LW | Judge: Guevara, Omar A2: Baudrillard( ) Baudrillard’s nostalgia makes him wrong about everythingMassumi ’87 A2: Asteroid Links( ) Alt not solve, Neg offense exaggerated, and they make things worse.Ashworth ’10 Detection Turn: Deeper detection checks nuclear deflectionMuese ’6 Researchers at Sandia National Laboratories in New Mexico have used a supercomputer to model and Nuclear option net worse – huge impactSchweickart’ 4 We avoid prepping space weapons for this contingencySchweickart ’4 ( ) Space Mil push ALREADY OUT THERE. Aff’s NON-MILITARISTIC space reps discourage Space Mil driveSAGE ’8 Asteroid Reps good. History proves they mobilize civil, not imperial, responses Indeed, many advisors perceive fictional film as a way to promote their science in Could strike by 2019Whitehouse 2 – Dr. David, Science Editor at BBC Online, "Space Rock ’On Collision Course’", BBC News, 7-24, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/2147879.stm An asteroid discovered just weeks ago has become the most threatening object yet detected in R2P Add OnPlan stops R2PHanania 12 – Richard Hanania, JD Candidate at the University of Chicago Law School and Writer at The Atlantic, "Humanitarian Intervention and the War Powers Debate", The Journal Jurisprudence, (2012) J. JURIS 47, http://www.jurisprudence.com.au/juris13/Hanania.pdf What we see is a public that is generally indifferent to foreign affairs, but Global nuclear warTrombly 11 – Dan Trombly, Ph.D Candidate in International Relations at George Washington University, "The Upending of Sovereignty", 8-27, http://slouchingcolumbia.wordpress.com/2011/08/27/the-upending-of-sovereignty/ The other, truly potent danger of this new set of norms is that it Russia conflict real and probable – prefer our evidence because of its dismissal of improbable threats like nuc terror while prioritizing other risksDelpech 12 The absence of a chapter on nuclear terrorism, listed as the first threat in NietzscheForced danger makes elective insecurity impossibleBooth 7 – Dr. Kenneth, Professor of International Relations at the University of Aberystwyth, Theory of World Security, p. 104-105) Perhaps the most hideous image of the congruity of insecurity and the determined life in Acting to help others generates meaningMay 5 – Todd May 5, philo prof at Clemson, "To change the world, to celebrate life", Philosophy 26 Social Criticism, vol 31, nos 5–6, 517–531 What are we to make of these references? We can, to be sure No impact to ressentimentKaufman, Prof Poli Sci and IR – U Delaware, ’9 Nietzsche 26 Ressentiment wrong – don’t generalize human experience based-on depressed dudes from the 1800’s.Foot ’1 Now on some points in his psychological observation Nietzsche undoubtedly was right; he was Suffering is not inevitable- their argument confuses frustration with suffering Pessimists sometimes explain their attitude by saying that life is never free from suffering. ( ) Particularity Thesis – We can advance accurate and contingent "small-T" truth claims without linking to broader theorization.Reinalda ’4 Middle-range theories The discussion between rationalists and constructivists is not limited to substantive ( ) Particularity is our epistemology – provides most accurate knowledge.Reinalda ’4 The contributions to this volume have shown that middle-range theories, or small World’s getting betterGoklany 9—Worked with federal and state governments, think tanks, and the private sector for over 35 years. Worked with IPCC before its inception as an author, delegate and reviewer. Negotiated UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. Managed the emissions trading program for the EPA. Julian Simon Fellow at the Property and Environment Research Center, visiting fellow at AEI, winner of the Julian Simon Prize and Award. PhD, MS, electrical engineering, MSU. B.Tech in electrical engineering, Indian Institute of Tech. (Indur, "Have increases in population, affluence and technology worsened human and environmental well-being?" 2009, http://www.ejsd.org/docs/HAVE_INCREASES_IN_POPULATION_AFFLUENCE_AND_TECHNOLOGY_WORSENED_HUMAN_AND_ENVIRONMENTAL_WELL-BEING.pdf) Although global population is no longer growing exponentially, it has quadrupled since 1900. Quality of life is skyrocketing worldwideRidley 10 – Ridley, visiting professor at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, former science editor of The Economist, and award-winning science writer, 2010 (Matt, The Rational Optimist, pg. 13-15) If my fictional family is not to your taste, perhaps you prefer statistics. Only the plan’s constitutionalFein 8 – Bruce Fein, JD from Harvard Law School, Principle at the Lichfield Group, and Resident Scholar at the Turkish Coalition of America, War Powers for the 21st Century: The Constitutional Perspective", Testimony Before the Subcommittee on International Organizations, Human Rights, and Oversight, House Committee on Foreign Affairs, 4-10, http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/2008_hr/warp21b.pdf I. ORIGINAL INTENT The Founding Fathers intended that Congress make decisions to initiate military D-RuleLevinson 00 (Daryl, Professor of law – University of Virginia, UC Law Review, Spring, Lexis) Extending a majority rule analysis of optimal deterrence to constitutional torts requires some explanation, | 1/4/14 |
Nonviolence K - 1AR - Indiana 3Tournament: Indiana | Round: 3 | Opponent: Louisville LR | Judge: Frederick KEpistemology SectionEpistemology meh==== Hidden Disad – MoralityNo, not ethics disad – consequences. That’s IsaacIssac, ’2 PermOur Aff is most ethical option —- reigning in the worst interventions solves their offense, but preserves the ethical good of avoiding conflictReus 4 – Christian Reus-Smit, Professor of International Relations at Australian National University, American Power and World Order, p. 109-115 The final ethical position — the polar opposite of the first — holds that the Alt Fails – Non-Violence/Pacifism( ) Nonviolence Alts *cause* militarism. Neg does not solve.Coates ’97 | 1/25/14 |
Nonviolence K - 2AC - Indiana 3Tournament: Indiana | Round: 3 | Opponent: Louisville LR | Judge: Frederick Heuristicsbetter decisions === ( ) Heuristics improve decision makingRachlinski – quoting Gigerenzer – ’12 The concept that heuristics are rational adaptations has been taken up with the most vigor ( ) Our heuristic args defeat the epistemology K.Hendrick ’94 The real value of heuristic analysis is its ability to improve decisions by reducing the
Particularity( ) Particularity Thesis – We can advance accurate and contingent "small-T" truth claims without linking to broader theorization.PRICE 26 REUS-SMIT 2K One of the central departures of critical international theory from positivism is the view that Kritik2AC Frontline 2.0
Impact’s empirically false – tons of militarism without extinction. Case impact turns it fasterGray 7—Director of the Centre for Strategic Studies and Professor of International Relations and Strategic Studies at the University of Reading, graduate of the Universities of Manchester and Oxford, Founder and Senior Associate to the National Institute for Public Policy, formerly with the International Institute for Strategic Studies and the Hudson Institute (Colin, July, "The Implications of Preemptive and Preventive War Doctrines: A Reconsideration", http://www.ciaonet.org/wps/ssi10561/ssi10561.pdf) 7. A policy that favors preventive warfare expresses a futile quest for absolute security ( ) Alt fails—-individual conversion doesn’t spill overPhillips 84 – Phillips, Prof. Philosophy, University of Connecticut, 1984 In concluding this discussion, it is worthwhile to raise briefly the question of the Non-violence can’t stop warRegan 96 – Regan, Professor of Political Science at Fordham, 1996 Pacifists generally argue that nonviolence and nonresistance will ultimately win the minds and hearts of Epistemology doesn’t mean our claims are wrong or that we shouldn’t act.Sil ’11 Lake is right to note that inter-paradigm debates frequently re?ect epistemological divisions, Congressional authorization forces the public to internalize the costs of warZelizer 11 – Julian E. Zelizer, Professor of History and Public Affairs at Princeton University, "War Powers Belong to Congress and the President", CNN Opinion, 6-27, http://www.cnn.com/2011/OPINION/06/27/zelizer.war.powers/index.html But the failure of Congress to fully participate in the initial decision to use military Legal restraints on use of force are the best check against militarism —- rejecting all intervention goes too far, won’t be accepted, and risks real security threatsFalk 1 – Richard Falk, Professor Emeritus of International Law at Princeton University, "Defining a Just War", The Nation, 10-11, http://www.thenation.com/article/defining-just-war~~23 I. ANTIWAR/PACIFIST APPROACH The pacifist position opposing even limited military action overlooks Our Aff is most ethical option —- reigning in the worst interventions solves their offense, but preserves the ethical good of avoiding conflictReus 4 – Christian Reus-Smit, Professor of International Relations at Australian National University, American Power and World Order, p. 109-115 The final ethical position — the polar opposite of the first — holds that the Film Args( ) Our Film disad and PIC – the same ideas can be conveyed without the displacement of film. This card proves film has specific downsides in an argumentative formet – and the alt is to endorse the Aff concept, including those embodies in the film, but to convey those ideas verbally. It creates better basis for clash and discussion.Jarvie ’4 My article is, of course, part of a literature discussing the strengths and Groupthink BadAff’s reversal of groupthink cuts down militarismPolley 11 Alt Fails – Non-Violence/Pacifism( ) Nonviolence Alts *cause* militarism. Neg does not solve.Coates ’97 A-to Militarism bad( ) Militarism K wrong – US power not that bad and Alt is hopeless.Ashworth ’10 Some threatsreal=== Some threats are real —- they reverse the error by ignoring themKnudsen 1 – Olav. F. Knudsen, Professor at Södertörn University College, Security Dialogue 32.3, "Post-Copenhagen Security Studies: Desecuritizing Securitization," p. 360 In the post-Cold War period, agenda-setting has been much easier | 1/25/14 |
Nonviolence K - 2AC - UK RR 4Tournament: UK RR | Round: 4 | Opponent: Kentucky GR | Judge: Green, Justin ( ) No, not ethics disad – consequencesIssac, ’2 Politics, in large part, involves contests over the distribution and use of power ( ) Their Faching ev doesn’t apply to debate and won’t cause extinction. It link only to them – their using it exclude usMoore, 2K ( ) Particularity answers epistemology – prefer specific, contingent truth claims.PRICE ’98 One of the central departures of critical international theory from positivism is the view that ( ) Policy Framework best checks regress, boosts clash with rest of the Aff. And, Reps don’t "create reality"—audiences are smart.Kraus ’89 ( ) Here’s on-point review of their Alt author:Reidbord ’13 | 10/4/13 |
Northwestern K 1AR - GSU Round 5Tournament: GSU | Round: 5 | Opponent: Northwestern MV | Judge: Malsin China/Taiwan threat is realDelpech 12 In addition, the evolving relationship between the United States and China is more likely And, root cause args wrong – their claim’s offense for us. Swanson ’5 Neolib doesnand#39;t make extinction inevitable. If so, alt won’t solve. And, particular Aff actions can work.Parenti 11 Bilgin WOULD vote for our plan and the permBilgin, ’5 | 10/4/13 |
Northwestern K 2AC - GSU Round 5Tournament: GSU | Round: 5 | Opponent: Northwestern MV | Judge: Malsin Radical rejection fails —- the plan’s the most pragmatic check on militarismBacevich 13 – Andrew, Professor of History and International Relations at Boston University and Ph.D. in American Diplomatic History from Princeton University, The New American Militarism, p. 205-210 There is, wrote H. L. Mencken, and#34;always a well- Plan’s essential to restrain short-term effects of militarism —- sweeping critique of war is too extreme to reach broad acceptanceBacevich 13 – Andrew, Professor of History and International Relations at Boston University and Ph.D. in American Diplomatic History from Princeton University, The New American Militarism, p. 205-210 There is, wrote H. L. Mencken, and#34;always a well- Congressional authorization forces the public to internalize the costs of warZelizer 11 – Julian E. Zelizer, Professor of History and Public Affairs at Princeton University, and#34;War Powers Belong to Congress and the Presidentand#34;, CNN Opinion, 6-27, http://www.cnn.com/2011/OPINION/06/27/zelizer.war.powers/index.html But the failure of Congress to fully participate in the initial decision to use military force has enormous costs AND Legal restraints on use of force are the best check against militarism —- rejecting all intervention goes too far, won’t be accepted, and risks real security threatsFalk 1 – Richard Falk, Professor Emeritus of International Law at Princeton University, and#34;Defining a Just Warand#34;, The Nation, 10-11, http://www.thenation.com/article/defining-just-war~~23 I. ANTIWAR/PACIFIST APPROACH The pacifist position opposing even limited military action overlooks Democratic alliances solve multiple existential threats that aren’t grounded in security logic—-environment, disease, and food—-that’s Ikenberry. Food shortages kill billionsBrown 5 Many Americans see terrorism as the principal threat to security, but for much of Evaluate using particularity—-no and#34;root causeand#34; or sweeping takeouts to our specific claimsPRICE ’98 One of the central departures of critical international theory from positivism is the view that Alt fails —- no meaningful effectLing ’97 Given these concerns with political transformation, post-colonialism exposes several internal ironies in Right fills in —- blocks transformationKnudsen 1 – Olav. F. Knudsen, Prof @ Södertörn Univ College, ’1 ~Security Dialogue 32.3, and#34;Post-Copenhagen Security Studies: Desecuritizing Securitization,and#34; p. 366~ A final danger in focusing on the state is that of building the illusion that Epistemology and methodology don’t come firstWendt, ’98 As a community, we in the academic study of international politics spend too much If we lose pre-fiat, then we do nothing. But non-concrete activism is WORSE THAN NOTHING. No Framework QUESTION can veer this round from the NEXUS QUESTION OF CONCRETE ALTS. Without those, we’re awful activists.Bryant ’12 I must be in a mood today– half irritated, half amused –because No impact to threat construction—-case turns the KKaufman 9 – Kaufman, Prof Poli Sci and IR – U Delaware, ’9 (Stuart J, and#34;Narratives and Symbols in Violent Mobilization: The Palestinian-Israeli Case,and#34; Security Studies 18:3, 400 – 434) Even when hostile narratives, group fears, and opportunity are strongly present, war Reps don’t shape security policyBalzacq 5 (Thierry, Professor of Political Science and International Relations at Namur University, and#34;The Three Faces of Securitization: Political Agency, Audience and Contextand#34; European Journal of International Relations, London: Jun 2005, Volume 11, Issue 2) However, despite important insights, this position remains highly disputable. The reason behind Iraq proves root cause claims wrong – militarism’s collusion with a variety of interests, pre-conditions and particularities cause war, not militarism aloneBacevich 13 The previous several chapters showed how the reaction to Vietnam produced radical changes in American Alt doomed to fail – militarism entrenched in the public and leaders at an unprecedentedly high levelBacevich 13 Today as never before in their history Americans are enthralled with military power. The ( ) Psycho-Analysis not the Root Cause – that over-explainsMuro-Ruiz 2 Violence is, most of the time, a wilful choice, especially if it ( ) Psychoanalysis is a non-falsifiable joke – prefer predictions and explanations based on empiricism.Coyne ’6 Laid out in the first four essays, Crews’s brief against Freud is hard to ( ) Rule of Law K wrong – too sweeping and poor data.Youngs ’11 This working paper offers a modest, but hopefully distinctive contribution to these debates by | 10/4/13 |
Nuclear PIC - 1AR - CSUF DubsTournament: CSUF | Round: Doubles | Opponent: Kentucky GR | Judge: JP, Hardy, Lucas-Bolin Warfighting DA – Speed – Ext – Congress FastCongress is fast —- solves almost any crisisDrum 11 – Kevin Drum, Columnist for Mother Jones, "The (Lack of) Power of Congress", Mother Jones, 3-21, http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2011/03/lack-power-congress Rather, there are certain specific areas where Congress has deliberately given up its authority CP CP – 1AR – SOPLoopholes get exploited by other countriesKrieger 00 – Linda Hamilton Krieger, Acting Professor of Law at the University of California, Berkeley, School of Law, "Afterword: Socio-Legal Backlash", Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law, 21 Berkeley J. Emp. 26 Lab. L. 476, Lexis Not surprisingly, this interpretive process is powerfully influenced by the taken-for- CP – 1AR – IranCrushes international support necessary for negotiationsKimball 6 – Kimball, Executive Director of the Arms Control Association, 06 (Daryl G., "’Completely Nuts.’" Arms Control Today, June, Proquest) As the international confrontation over Iran’s nuclear program gradually escalates, the Bush administration insists Warfighting PIC – Ext – LoopholesDefinitions get decided by the Executive. Exceptions are huge loopholes.Stevenson 8 – Charles A. Stevenson, Professor of National Security Policy at the National War College, "Congress in Retreat on War Powers Reform", Boston Globe, 7-11, http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2008/07/11/congress_in_retreat_on_war_powers_reform/ Current law requires consultations and reports whenever the president wants to send troops into hostile Their exception is imprecise —- gets broadened to ruin the restrictionGlennon 92 – Michael J. Glennon, Professor of International Law at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Tufts University, "State-Sponsored Abduction: A Comment on United States v. Alvarez-Machain", The American Society of International Law Newsletter, October, 86 A.J.I.L. 746, Lexis The easiest way to bring the United States into compliance with customary international law would | 1/8/14 |
Nuclear PIC - 2AC - CSUF DubsTournament: CSUF | Round: Doubles | Opponent: Kentucky GR | Judge: JP, Hardy, Lucas-Bolin IV. Procedural v. Substantive Reform Approaches Professor Ely and I start from the CP destroys clarity of the signalCooper 9 – Ryan Cooper, Political Theory at University of Texas at Austin, "Meaning versus Authority: A Defense Extra-Constitutional Prerogative", Spring, http://lilt.ilstu.edu/critique/Spring2009docs/Ryan20Cooper.pdf Critics might assert that precedents do not have this sort of "generative power" Doesn’t solve SOPRaven 87 – Raven-Hansen, Professor of Law and Faculty Associate in Public Policy, National Law Center, George Washington University, 1987 (Peter, First Use of Nuclear Weapons: Under the Constitution , pp.219-220) But there is an additional constitutional justification for a first use ban. Under the No impact to deterrence and the U.S. will misuse it anyway—misunderstanding about the concept, faulty threat assessmetns, forgetfulness about history, shortsighted policymakingBetts, 13 (Richard K. – Director of the Saltzman Institute of War and Peace Studies at Columbia University and Adjunct Senior Fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, March/April, "The Lost Logic of Deterrence: What the Strategy That Won the Cold War Can-and Can’t-Do Now", Foreign Affairs 92.2, ProQuest) Deterrence isn’t what it used to be. In the second half of the twentieth | 1/8/14 |
Nuclear PIC - 2AC - Indiana 7Tournament: Indiana | Round: 7 | Opponent: Michigan CP | Judge: Hingstman Ruins solvencyLobel 95 – Jules Lobel, Professor at University of Pittsburgh Law School, ""Little Wars" and the Constitution", University of Miami Law Review, October, 50 U. Miami L. Rev. 61, Lexis IV. Procedural v. Substantive Reform Approaches Professor Ely and I start from the Nuclear’s keyRaven 87 – Raven-Hansen, Professor of Law and Faculty Associate in Public Policy, National Law Center, George Washington University, 1987 (Peter, First Use of Nuclear Weapons: Under the Constitution , pp.219-220) But there is an additional constitutional justification for a first use ban. Under the CP creates a loophole that dilutes the normNowrot 98 – Karsten Nowrot, LL.M., Indiana University School of Law – Bloomington, and Emily W. Schabacker, B.A. McGill University (Canada); M.A., University of East Anglia (England); J.D., Indiana University School of Law-Bloomington, "The Use of Force to Restore Democracy: International Legal Implications of the ECOWAS Intervention in Sierra Leone", American University International Law Review, 14 Am. U. Int’l L. Rev. 321, Lexis A legal construction excluding the use of force for "benign ends" n108 from US deterrence low nowHeinrichs 13(Rebeccah, expert on nuclear deterrence and missile defense. She is a Visiting Fellow at The Heritage Foundation, With North Korea threat looming, US nuclear disarmament has others deciding to ’arm up’, http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2013/03/13/with-north-korea-threat-looming-us-nuclear-disarmament-has-others-deciding-to/ | 1/26/14 |
OLC CP - 2AC - Texas DubsTournament: Texas | Round: Doubles | Opponent: Emory JS | Judge: Gramzinski, Arnett, Walters OLCNo durable enforcementHLR 12 – Harvard Law Review 12, "Developments in the Law: Presidential Authority," Vol. 125:2057, www.harvardlawreview.org/media/pdf/vol125_devo.pdf Political checks thus can work to restrain the President by prompting executive self-binding Doesn’t solve SOP —-Statutory check’s key to signal restraint —- states look to formal structures —- that’s Damrosch. CP fails.Scheuerman 12 – William E. Scheuerman, Professor of Political Science and West European Studies at Indiana University, "Review Essay: Emergencies, Executive Power, and the Uncertain Future of US Presidential Democracy", Law and Social Inquiry, Summer, 37 Law 26 Soc. Inquiry 743, Lexis Posner and Vermeule rely on two main claims. First, even if the president ====Plan’s way more credible==== That Posner and Vermeule miss the role of legal compliance as a powerful signal, Obama will overrule the OLCGoldsmith 13 – Goldsmith 13 – Jack Goldsmith, Henry L. Shattuck Professor at Harvard Law School, "Blaming (or Crediting) the Lawyers for Our Syria Policy", Lawfare Blog, 7-15, http://www.lawfareblog.com/2013/07/blaming-or-crediting-the-lawyers-for-our-syria-policy/ First, the Obama administration has continued controversial Bush-era interpretations of international law | 2/10/14 |
OU CL K - 1AR - Harvard 8Tournament: Harvard | Round: 8 | Opponent: OU CL | Judge: Kirk Reject essentialism – even if it’s an attempt at "strategic essentialism":McLaurin ’12 Philosopher Lawrence Blum, in writing on stereotypes as a general phenomenon,¶ attempts a Fuck K – A2: Rejection BadCalls to stop using exclusionary pejoratives make language more preciseSmith, Co-Founder Feminists with disabilities for a way forward, 9 People often accuse people like me of being "language police." I’ve been informed Fuck K – A2: Reclaiming GoodSpecificity 1st –terms needs to be regulated where there’s a clear story of negative effectFleche ’99 some language can’t get redeployed.Musselman ’98 Code-SwitchingCode-switching decreases African-American college students participationKoch ’1 Only one study has empirically assessed African American reactions to¶ CS. Doss and Increased Black English decreases African-American participation – Studies prove African-Americans steer-away from settings that build it inKoch ’1 One language that has received increasing attention from researchers, theorists,¶ and the public The methodology of our study speaks to the very audience that they seek to courtKoch ’1 PARTICIPANTS¶ The sample consisted of 102 African American undergraduates at a public¶ university | 11/5/13 |
OU CL K - 2AC - Harvard 8Tournament: Harvard | Round: 8 | Opponent: OU CL | Judge: Kirk Their call for the Ballot as currency does not solve – it rest of complex questions of movements and change theory. Presume the ballot will not boost an external goalRitter ’13 Many students who participate in comp etitive interscholastic debate in high school and college 20 A-to "You’re with us or against us"( ) We’ll K the rhetoric of "you’re with us or against us". It has baggage from other oppressive contexts and – conceptually – it’s a means for alienation and violence.Ritter ’13 The fiction of social change through debate abuses the win–loss structure of debate KTheir use of the "f" word is an independent reason to vote negative—it normalizes sexual violence and makes a culture of domination inevitableSchwyzer, Prof of Gender Studies, 9 ~community college history and gender studies professor, DPhil, Berkley (Hugo, "Penetrate" v. "Engulf" and the multiple meanings of the "f" word: a note on feminist language, 4 November 2009, http://hugoschwyzer.net/2009/11/04/penetrate-v-engulf-and-the-multiple-meanings-of-the-f-word-a-note-on-feminist-language/~~ Wilderson Frontline( ) Wilderson’s too pessimistic – this reifies his own K and locks-in the worst oppression.Marriott ’12 Whatever one might think of the cogency of these remarks (if only because the Problem-Solution GoodRejection of problem solving is elitist and locks in oppression of the marginalized A2: Positive Peace LinksIntervention directly kills which should be rejected —- and causes wider conflict that blocks positive peaceMiall ’99 (Hugh, Et Al., Reader in Peace and Conflict Research and Director of the Institute for Peace Studies - U Lancaster, Contemporary Conflict Resolution: The Prevention, Management, and Transformation of Deadly Conflicts p.222-3) We hope that this book has shown that the founders of the conflict resolution approach This turns the K —- more than they turn the caseGoldstein 1 – Josh Goldstein, Professor of Int’l Relations, American University, War and Gender, p. 412 First, peace activists face a dilemma in thinking about causes of war and working Authenticity Testing—- It stifles dialogue and is reductionist —- Our arguments are relevant and bracketing them out destroys efforts for change.Bridges 2001 | 11/5/13 |
Oversight CP - 2AC - UK RR 4Tournament: UK RR | Round: 4 | Opponent: Kentucky GR | Judge: Green, Justin CP doesn’t fiat the executive listens to the review board – he won’tStevenson 8 – Charles A. Stevenson, Professor of National Security Policy at the National War College, "Congress in Retreat on War Powers Reform", Boston Globe, 7-11, http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2008/07/11/congress_in_retreat_on_war_powers_reform/ What’s worse, their recommended substitute for the 1973 war powers law would make it He’ll co-opt —- doesn’t stop interventionFisher 8 – Louis Fisher, Specialist in Constitutional Law Law Library of the Library of Congress, "War Powers for the 21st Century: The Constitutional Perspective", Testimony Before the Subcommittee on International Organizations, Human Rights, and Oversight, House Committee on Foreign Affairs, 4-10, http://loc.gov/law/help/usconlaw/pdf/war-fa-2008.pdf VI. Consultation For reasons given above, I would delete the following language in Power of the purse doesn’t solve – the committee won’t use itHeder 9 Congress can end a war, therefore, through use of the appropriation power or Counterplan doesn’t signal morale or unified purposeWeingast 98 – Matthew S. Weingast, Adjunct Professor at the Joint Military Intelligence College, Associate on the National Security Team at Booz-Allen 26 Hamilton, M.S. in Strategic Intelligence from The Defense Intelligence College, Former Strategic Intelligence Officer for The Joint Chiefs of Staff, "The Strategic Necessity Perspective: A New Approach to Solving Old Constitutional War Powers Questions", USAFA Journal of Legal Studies, 8 USAFA J. Leg. Stud. 109, Lexis The Strategic Necessity Perspective: What It Is and How It Works Simply put, | 10/4/13 |
Oversight CP 1AR - GSU Round 4Tournament: GSU | Round: 4 | Opponent: Kentucky GV | Judge: Norris Oversight CP 1ARExecutive will co-opt oversightFisher 8 – Louis Fisher, Specialist in Constitutional Law Law Library of the Library of Congress, and#34;War Powers for the 21st Century: The Constitutional Perspectiveand#34;, Testimony Before the Subcommittee on International Organizations, Human Rights, and Oversight, House Committee on Foreign Affairs, 4-10, http://loc.gov/law/help/usconlaw/pdf/war-fa-2008.pdf VI. Consultation Oversight doesn’t constrain the president – perception, political risks, and court backingSchonberg 4 – Karl K. Schonberg, Assistant Professor of Government at St. Lawrence University, and#34;Global Security and Legal Restraint: Reconsidering War Powers after September 11and#34;, Political Science, 119(1), p. 140-141 Even if the executive doesn’t flat out ignore congress it will ruin the process by withholding informationOrnstein and Mann 6(Norman, resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, Thomas, W. Averell Harriman Chair and senior fellow in Governance Studies at The Brookings Institution, and#34;When Congress Checks Out,and#34; December, ProQuest) Formal checks are key – otherwise congress will just punt the decisionHealy 8 – Gene Healy, Vice President at the Cato Institute, The Cult of the Presidency: America’s Dangerous Devotion to Executive Power, p. 273 In 2005, foreign policy luminaries Leslie H. Gelb and Anne-Marie Slaughter | 10/4/13 |
Oversight CP UK - 2AC - Clay 4Tournament: Clay | Round: 4 | Opponent: Kentucky GV | Judge: Brown, Nick CP doesn’t fiat the executive listens to the review board – he won’tStevenson 8 – Charles A. Stevenson, Professor of National Security Policy at the National War College, "Congress in Retreat on War Powers Reform", Boston Globe, 7-11, http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2008/07/11/congress_in_retreat_on_war_powers_reform/ He’ll co-opt —- doesn’t stop interventionFisher 8 – Louis Fisher, Specialist in Constitutional Law Law Library of the Library of Congress, "War Powers for the 21st Century: The Constitutional Perspective", Testimony Before the Subcommittee on International Organizations, Human Rights, and Oversight, House Committee on Foreign Affairs, 4-10, http://loc.gov/law/help/usconlaw/pdf/war-fa-2008.pdf VI. Consultation For reasons given above, I would delete the following language in Power of the purse doesn’t solve – the committee won’t use itHeder 9 Congress can end a war, therefore, through use of the appropriation power or Counterplan doesn’t signal morale or unified purposeWeingast 98 – Matthew S. Weingast, Adjunct Professor at the Joint Military Intelligence College, Associate on the National Security Team at Booz-Allen 26 Hamilton, M.S. in Strategic Intelligence from The Defense Intelligence College, Former Strategic Intelligence Officer for The Joint Chiefs of Staff, "The Strategic Necessity Perspective: A New Approach to Solving Old Constitutional War Powers Questions", USAFA Journal of Legal Studies, 8 USAFA J. Leg. Stud. 109, Lexis The Strategic Necessity Perspective: What It Is and How It Works Simply put, | 10/6/13 |
PMC Shift DA - 1AR - Clay 7Tournament: Clay | Round: 7 | Opponent: USC PV | Judge: Revelins PMC use high and inevitable and credibility impacts already triggeredSchwartz and Church 13(Moshe, specialist in defense acquisition, Jennifer, U.S. Department of Army Fellow, "Department of Defense’s Use of Contractors to Support Military Operations: Background, Analysis, and Issues for Congress," Congressional Research Service, May 17, http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/R43074.pdf-http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/R43074.pdf) Throughout its history, the Department of Defense (DOD) has relied on contractors | 11/5/13 |
PMC Shift DA - 2AC - Clay 7Tournament: Clay | Round: 7 | Opponent: USC PV | Judge: Revelins Massive PMC use high and inevitable - empirics disprove their impactsDunigan 13(Molly, political scientist at RAND, Christian Science Monitor, "A lesson from Iraq war: How to outsource war to private contractors," March 19, http://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/Opinion/2013/0319/A-lesson-from-Iraq-war-How-to-outsource-war-to-private-contractors) The plan prevents PMC circumventionNorys 10(Jenna, Contracts Administrator - US Offices/International Business Development at Wilson 26 Associates, LLC, "The New Faces of US Armed Forces: The Constitution and Private Military Firms," http://www.juridicas.unam.mx/wccl/ponencias/6/104.pdf) | 11/5/13 |
Prez Powers DA - 2AC - Texas 3Tournament: Texas | Round: 3 | Opponent: Georgetown ErMc | Judge: Katsulas Prez Powers – 2ACNo risk of overall prez powers collapseHowell 13 The men and women who eventually become president may not come into this world with Executive orders solveFox News, 1-29-2014 http://latino.foxnews.com/latino/politics/2014/01/29/obama-state-union-address-highlights/ President Barack Obama urged Congress to help restore opportunity for Americans but pledged to take WarmingNo extinction—-mitigation and adaptation will solveMendelsohn, 9 (Robert O. Mendelsohn 9, the Edwin Weyerhaeuser Davis Professor, Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University, June 2009, "Climate Change and Economic Growth," online: http://www.growthcommission.org/storage/cgdev/documents/gcwp060web.pdf) These statements are largely alarmist and misleading. Although climate change is a serious problem Warming’s inevitableNPR 9 (National Public Radio, 1/26, "Global Warming Is Irreversible, Study Says, All Things Considered", http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=99888903) Climate change is essentially irreversible, according to a sobering new scientific study. As | 2/8/14 |
Prez Powers DA - 2AC - UK RR 2Tournament: UK RR | Round: 2 | Opponent: Michigan AP | Judge: Hardy Authorization’s key to durable support by locking in public and Congressional backing —- ensures funding and human capital necessary to win wars —- also key to morale and cohesion —- that’s Gelb and Frye. Turns Congressional interference linksWaxman 13 – Matthew Waxman, Law Professor at Columbia Law School, and#34;The Most Puzzling Line of the President’s Speechand#34;, Lawfare Blog, 9-11, http://www.lawfareblog.com/2013/09/the-most-puzzling-line-of-the-presidents-speech/ I recently posted my new paper on The Constitutional Power to Threaten War (forthcoming Flexibility link’s a lieStreichler 8 – Stuart Streichler, Adjunct Faculty at Seattle University School of Law. Ph.D. at Johns Hopkins University; J.D. at the University of Michigan Law School; B.S. at Bowling Green State University, and#34;Mad about Yoo, or Why Worry about the Next Unconstitutional Warand#34;, The Journal of Law 26 Politics, Winter, 24 J. L. 26 Politics 93, Lexis When Yoo discusses the need for flexibility in the process for warmaking, he creates Extra-constitutional action solves extreme short-term threats —- President can violate and get approval later —- that’s Lobel. Solves the DA but avoids spilloverPosner 10 – Eric A. Posner, Professor at the University of Chicago School of Law, and#34;Executive Decisionand#34;, The New Republic, 3-29, http://www.newrepublic.com/book/review/executive-decision Imagine that U.S. agents nab a terrorist who knows the location of | 10/4/13 |
Prez Powers DA 1AR - GSU Round 2Tournament: GSU | Round: 2 | Opponent: Michigan CH | Judge: Severson PPA2: Speed Congress can make fast decisionsBarak-Erez, 9 (Daphne – Visiting Professor at Stanford Law School, Fall, and#34;Terrorism Law between the Executive and Legislative Modelsand#34;, American Journal of Comparative Law 57 Am. J. Comp. L. 877, Lexis) Timing - A standard justification for the use of executive-based anti-terrorism
| 10/4/13 |
Prez Powers DA 2AC - GSU Round 2Tournament: GSU | Round: 2 | Opponent: Michigan CH | Judge: Severson Won’t pass- momentum, conclusive, no GOP supportWhat do Boehner and GOP leaders intend to do? In a way, that’s PC low and fails for fiscal fightsGreg Sargent 9-12, September 12th, 2013, and#34;The Morning Plum: Senate conservatives stick the knife in House GOP leaders,and#34; Washington Post, factiva All of this underscores a basic fact about this fall’s fiscal fights: Far and Obama not pushing- won’t even picnicOn the eve of another fiscal showdown with congressional Republicans, President Obama is outright Budget, farm bill, Syria, energy and immigration thumpWill the House pass a short-term budget this week? Maybe. Will Losers don’t necessarily lose- can still get big agenda items after a lossWeisberg 5. (Jacob Weisberg, Editor, and#34;Bush’s First Defeat: The president has lost on Social Security. How will he handle it?and#34; Slate, March 31, 2005, http://www.slate.com/id/2115141/-http://blog.al.com/breaking/2011/06/nasa_supporters_find_no_white.html) Err aff- neg impacts are media fear-mongeringGoodwin 13 ~Tracy, graduate student in political science (Stonybrook), and#34;Fear-Mongering is Despicable Regardless of who is doing it,and#34; SocioPolitical Dysfunction, 2/27, http://sociopoliticaldysfunction.wordpress.com/category/politics-2/international-relations-politics/-http://sociopoliticaldysfunction.wordpress.com/category/politics-2/international-relations-politics/~~ Then even after the sequestration showdown this week we have another fear-mongering opportunity Huge bipartisan support for the planGelb 5 – Leslie H. Gelb, President Emeritus of the Council on Foreign Relations and Anne-Marie Slaughter, Dean of the Woodrow Wilson School of International and Public Affairs, and#34;Declare Warand#34;, The Atlantic, 11-1, http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2005/11/declare-war/304301/?single_page=true Passing this legislation might not be easy. But the time is right. Liberals 2ACCongress is fast —- solves almost any crisisDrum 11 – Kevin Drum, Columnist for Mother Jones, and#34;The (Lack of) Power of Congressand#34;, Mother Jones, 3-21, http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2011/03/lack-power-congress Rather, there are certain specific areas where Congress has deliberately given up its authority Structural constraints cause prior planning and make flexibility effective —- unchecked power backfiresPearlstein 9 – Deborah N. Pearlstein, Visiting Scholar and Lecturer in Public and International Affairs, Woodrow Wilson School of Public 26 International Affairs, Princeton University, and#34;Form and Function in the National Security Constitutionand#34;, Connecticut Law Review, July, 41 Conn. L. Rev. 1549, Lexis
Reject Posner and VermeulePildes 12 – Richard H. Pildes, Sudler Family Professor of Constitutional Law at the NYU School of Law and Co-Director of the NYU Center on Law and Security, and#34;Book Review: Law and the Presidentand#34;, Harvard Law Review, April, 125 Harv. L. Rev. 1381, Lexis In sum, Posner and Vermeule do not actually present much evidence at all, Plan leaves flexibility to respond to terrorismFleischman 10 – Matthew Fleischman, J.D. Candidate at New York University School of Law, and#34;A Functional Distribution of War Powersand#34;, New York University Journal of Legislation and Public Policy, 13 N.Y.U. J. Legis. 26 Pub. Pol’y 137, Lexis C. Responding to Terrorism - War Powers in the Twenty-First Century | 10/4/13 |
Prez PowersHeg DA 2AC - GSU Round 4Tournament: GSU | Round: 4 | Opponent: Kentucky GV | Judge: Norris A2: Warfighting TurnsExecutive power is fallible and prone to miscalculation —- impact is global nuclear warAdler 11 – David Gray Adler, Professor of Political Science at the University of Idaho, and#34;Presidential Ascendancy in Foreign Affairs and the Subversion of the Constitutionand#34;, Presented to the German-American Conference on and#34;Comparisons of Parliamentary and Coordinated Power (Presidential) Systemsand#34;, 3-8, http://www.civiced.org/pdfs/GermanAmericanConf2011/Adler.pdf A considerable literature urges executive supremacy, and extols the supposed virtues of presidential assertion Congress knows better —- they’ll only stop bad warsKoh 6 – Harold Koh, Professor of International Law at Yale Law School and Former Assistant Secretary of State for Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, and#34;Setting the World Rightand#34;, The Yale Law Journal, 115 Yale L.J. 2350, Lexis Remarkably, the authors suggest that recent setbacks in the Iraq War support their case If opposition is strong, they’ll tube military effectiveness by acting behind the scenesSomin 7 – Ilya Somin, Professor of Law at George Mason University School of Law, and#34;Can Presidents Wage War Without Congressional Support?and#34;, Volokh Conspiracy, 9-13, http://www.volokh.com/archives/archive_2007_09_09-2007_09_15.shtml~~231189716517 I disagree. In fact, it is very difficult for a president to either initiate or continue a military conflict without fairly AND Plan leaves flexibility to respond to terrorism and rogue statesFleischman 10 – Matthew Fleischman, J.D. Candidate at New York University School of Law, and#34;A Functional Distribution of War Powersand#34;, New York University Journal of Legislation and Public Policy, 13 N.Y.U. J. Legis. 26 Pub. Pol’y 137, Lexis C. Responding to Terrorism - War Powers in the Twenty-First Century | 10/4/13 |
QDR CP - 1AR - CSUF 3Tournament: CSUF | Round: 3 | Opponent: Michigan KK | Judge: Gannon, Seth Recommendation CPs – QDR – 2ACPerm – do the CP – plan doesn’t commit to certainty —- "should" means desirable, not mandatoryAC 99 (Atlas Collaboration, "Use of Shall, Should, May Can," http://rd13doc.cern.ch/Atlas/DaqSoft/sde/inspect/-http://rd13doc.cern.ch/Atlas/DaqSoft/sde/inspect/ shall.html) shall ’shall’ describes something that is mandatory. If a requirement uses ’shall’, then "Resolved" doesn’t require certaintyWebster’s 9 – Merriam Webster ’9 (http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/resolved) ~23 Main Entry: 1re•solve ~23 Pronunciation: \ri-?zälv, -?zo?lv also -?zäv or -?zo?v\ ~23 Function: verb ~23 Inflected Form(s): re•solved; re•solv•ing 1 : to become separated into component parts; also : to become reduced by dissolving or analysis 2 : to form a resolution : determine 3 : consult, deliberate No implementationFreedberg 13 It’s that time again. Though delayed by the still-unsettled strife over sequestration Congress will ignore recommendations on hostilitiesHealy et al 5 In some ways, that was nothing new. Throughout the 20th century,¶ congressional Congress has to act first – key to SOP and Congressional leadershipFisher 4 Members of Congress need to participate in the daily grind of overseeing administration policies, Strong assertion of Congressional power is vital – it has to fight for the actionHamilton 4 One voice has been conspicuous in its absence, however: that of Congress itself Congress can’t give mixed signals – it needs to make oversight a priorityRosenberg 9 As this handbook goes to press, the opening months of the 111th Congress have Commission fails and links to politicsMayer 7 – Kenneth R. Mayer, Professor of Political Science at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, "The Base Realignment and Closure Process: Is It Possible to Make Rational Policy?", December, http://users.polisci.wisc.edu/kmayer/Professional/Base20Realignment20and20Closure20Process.pdf-http://users.polisci.wisc.edu/kmayer/Professional/Base Realignment and Closure Process.pdf *NOTE – this is the conclusion of their 1NC solvency article Delegating on Other Issues: Is the Independent Commission Model Viable? In his review | 1/7/14 |
Rana K - 1AR - Texas DubsTournament: Texas | Round: Doubles | Opponent: Emory JS | Judge: Gramzinski, Arnett, Walters Formal Checks Key( ) Rana’s populist Alt fails and he’s too pessimistic about current order.Simon ’12 The absence of explicit comparisons in these chapters also diminishes the force of the normative ( ) perm best solves Rana’s K – this card rules.Setty ’12 Professor Aziz Rana urges a broad and populist reconsideration of the idea that the administration : Positive Peace LinksIntervention directly kills which should be rejected —- and causes wider conflict that blocks positive peaceMiall ’99 (Hugh, Et Al., Reader in Peace and Conflict Research and Director of the Institute for Peace Studies - U Lancaster, Contemporary Conflict Resolution: The Prevention, Management, and Transformation of Deadly Conflicts p.222-3) We hope that this book has shown that the founders of the conflict resolution approach Mechanism – Institutional Change Key – 1ARAlt fails without a clear mechanism for changeJones 99 – Richard Wyn, Lecturer in the Department of International Politics at the University of Wales, Security, Strategy, and Critical Theory, CIAO, http://www.ciaonet.org/book/wynjones/wynjones06.html Because emancipatory political practice is central to the claims of critical theory, one might 1AR – Scripted Backline – FrameworkIn a compromise framework, reps might have an internal link that turns case, but not the vital one.Rotter 2K | 2/10/14 |
Rana K - 1AR - USC 2Tournament: USC | Round: 2 | Opponent: Emory AB | Judge: Kallmyer China( ) The K of "China threats" reifies – by identifying the flaws in US posture and painting China as victimized, the IR system replicates itselfCallahan ’5 Hence by turning China threat into a theory, the discourse moves from merely responding Mechanism – Institutional Change Key – 1ARInstitutional focus is essential to influence elites —- especially for war powersMcClean 1 – David E., Society for the Advancement of American Philosophy – New School University, "The Cultural Left and the Limits of Social Hope", http://www.american-philosophy.org/archives/past_conference_programs/pc2001/Discussion20papers/david_mcclean.htm Those who suffer or have suffered from this disease Rorty refers to as the Cultural Declaring an alt means nothing —- mechanism for proximate change’s keyMurray 97 – Alastair J.H., Professor of Political Theory at the University of Edinburgh, Reconstructing Realism: Between Power Politics and Cosmopolitan Ethics, p. 188-189 Realists, however, would be unlikely to be troubled by such charges. Ashley KapplerAlt fails – individual change can’t stop violence – broad change necessaryGelber 95 (Dr. Kath, Professor of Social Sciences and Political Studies – University of New South Wales, "The Will to Oversimplify", Green Left Online, 8-16, http://www.greenleft.org.au/1995/198/11413) The Will to Violence presents a powerful and one-sided critique of the forces Reps( ) language doesn’t create reality – your critical scholars aren’t the right kind of experts to even make that claim.Johnson ’93 Rana K – Alt Fails – 1AR( ) Rana’s "bottom-up political" Alt can’t solve and reifiesO’Rourke ’11 This is not to say, however, that Rana’s normative aims do not themselves | 1/3/14 |
Rana K - 2AC - Texas DubsTournament: Texas | Round: Doubles | Opponent: Emory JS | Judge: Gramzinski, Arnett, Walters Landmines CardThis focus on NSA’s breaks down conventional IRGeneva Call ’7 Armed conflicts are complex situations. Once under way, they develop their own logic Starting with NSAs rejects state-centric "security" and checks militarizationWall ’10 Due to their widespread availability and cheap cost, anti-personnel mines were the NK Internal DocsThis is based on internal documents, not Western IR
| 2/10/14 |
Rana K - 2AC - USC 2Tournament: USC | Round: 2 | Opponent: Emory AB | Judge: Kallmyer Disease RepsDisease likely —- causes extinction The outcome of this marriage, however, is not as clearly defined as it Disease securitization is good – independent reason to vote aff in their frameworkPalomba ’8 Preemption LinkPlan’s key to repudiate preemptionBacevich 7 – Andrew, Professor of History and International Relations at Boston University and Ph.D. in American Diplomatic History from Princeton University, "Rescinding the Bush Doctrine", Boston Globe, 3-1, http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2007/03/01/rescinding_the_bush_doctrine/ RATHER THAN vainly sniping at President Bush over his management of the Iraq war, Preemption’s model causes global conflict—-goes nuclearSteinberg 2 – James B. Steinberg, Vice President and Director of Foreign Policy at the Brookings Institution, Michael E. O’Hanlon and Susan E. Rice, "The New National Security Strategy and Preemption", Brookings Policy Brief Series, December, http://www.brookings.edu/research/papers/2002/12/terrorism-ohanlon-http://www.brookings.edu/research/papers/2002/12/terrorism-ohanlon The Dangers of Legitimating Preemption A final concern relates to the impact of the precedent Food Reps( ) Hunger depictions good – Global food surplus exists now. If nothing else, depictions cause meaningful short-term redistribution.Ó Gráda ’9 By FAO definitions, the world still contains about eight hundred million malnourished people. ( ) Food depictions can produce meaningful change.Robb ’12 Rana K – 2ACOur Cole ev’s about Rana. Even if Reps impact Law, Plan’s effect on ending secrecy overwhelms the turn – Here’s more from Cole ’12:David Cole – Professor, Georgetown University Law Center. COMMENTARY: NATIONAL SECURITY: RESPONSE: Confronting the Wizard of Oz: National Security, Expertise, and Secrecy – Review of Aziz Rana, "Who Decides on Security?", Connecticut Law Review – 44 Conn. L. Rev. 1627 – July, 2012 – lexis, lawrev section Rana’s account of the epistemological underpinnings of the national security state offers an astute and ( ) Law doesn’t always fail.Dean ’1 The study of governmentality has yet to open up the extensive discussion of authoritarian and ( ) And, Reps don’t "create reality"—audiences are smart.Kraus ’89 Rana not trying to prescribe policy – admits he cherry-picks history.O’Rourke ’11 The broad sweep of this narrative tempts a question often asked of historically grounded constitutional Security K too sweeping and Alt fails.Ling ’97 Given these concerns with political transformation, post-colonialism exposes several internal ironies in Reps don’t shape security policyBalzacq 5 (Thierry, Professor of Political Science and International Relations at Namur University, "The Three Faces of Securitization: Political Agency, Audience and Context" European Journal of International Relations, London: Jun 2005, Volume 11, Issue 2) However, despite important insights, this position remains highly disputable. The reason behind No impact to threat con—-case turns the KKaufman 9 – Kaufman, Prof Poli Sci and IR – U Delaware, ’9 (Stuart J, "Narratives and Symbols in Violent Mobilization: The Palestinian-Israeli Case," Security Studies 18:3, 400 – 434) Even when hostile narratives, group fears, and opportunity are strongly present, war Right fills in —- blocks transformationKnudsen 1 – Olav. F. Knudsen, Prof @ Södertörn Univ College, ’1 ~Security Dialogue 32.3, "Post-Copenhagen Security Studies: Desecuritizing Securitization," p. 366~ A final danger in focusing on the state is that of building the illusion that Role of the ballot is to simulate Congressional action —- spurs actionFisher 5 – Louis Fisher, Senior Specialist in Separation of Powers with the Congressional Research Service, the Library of Congress, "The Law: Scholarly Support for Presidential Wars", Presidential Studies Quarterly, 35(3), September, p. 603-605 Reconsiderations Legal restraints on use of force are the best check against militarism —- rejecting all intervention goes too far, won’t be accepted, and risks real security threatsFalk 1 – Richard Falk, Professor Emeritus of International Law at Princeton University, "Defining a Just War", The Nation, 10-11, http://www.thenation.com/article/defining-just-war~~23 I. ANTIWAR/PACIFIST APPROACH The pacifist position opposing even limited military action overlooks Our Aff is most ethical option —- reigning in the worst interventions solves their offense, but preserves the ethical good of avoiding conflictReus 4 – Christian Reus-Smit, Professor of International Relations at Australian National University, American Power and World Order, p. 109-115 The final ethical position — the polar opposite of the first — holds that the A2: Positive PeaceIntervention directly kills which should be rejected —- and causes wider conflict that blocks positive peaceMiall ’99 (Hugh, Et Al., Reader in Peace and Conflict Research and Director of the Institute for Peace Studies - U Lancaster, Contemporary Conflict Resolution: The Prevention, Management, and Transformation of Deadly Conflicts p.222-3) We hope that this book has shown that the founders of the conflict resolution approach This turns the K —- more than they turn the caseGoldstein 1 – Josh Goldstein, Professor of Int’l Relations, American University, War and Gender, p. 412 First, peace activists face a dilemma in thinking about causes of war and working Perm —- work for both positive and negative peace, including the plan —- that’s bestGaltung 85 (Johan, Peace Researcher and Originator of "Positive and Negative Peace", Journal of Peace Research, vol 22 no 2 p. 145) That peace has something to do with ’absence of violence is so widespread as an ( ) Populist Alts fail – should theorize macro-options.Simon ’12 The absence of explicit comparisons in these chapters also diminishes the force of the normative | 1/3/14 |
Redaction CP - 1AR - Texas 5Tournament: Texas | Round: 5 | Opponent: Houston LR | Judge: Abelkop, Adam Certainty Key – 2ACCongress can’t give mixed signals – it needs to make oversight a priorityRosenberg 9 As this handbook goes to press, the opening months of the 111th Congress have Perm: Do the CP"Should" is desirable, not mandatoryAC 99 (Atlas Collaboration, "Use of Shall, Should, May Can," http://rd13doc.cern.ch/Atlas/DaqSoft/sde/inspect/shall.html) shall | 2/9/14 |
Redaction CP - 2AC - Texas 5Tournament: Texas | Round: 5 | Opponent: Houston LR | Judge: Abelkop, Adam ( ) Necropolitics thesis wrong and re-trenches power.Mitropoulos ’5 Mbembe concludes the essay by arguing that the concept of biopolitics might be better replaced ( ) Checks solveDickinson ’4 In an important programmatic statement of 1996 Geoff Eley celebrated the fact that Foucault’s ideas | 2/9/14 |
Repeal WPR CP 2AC - GSU Round 4Tournament: GSU | Round: 4 | Opponent: Kentucky GV | Judge: Norris Repeal WPR CPOnly declarations secure durable support and clear strategyGallagher 11 – Lieutenant Colonel Joseph V. Gallagher III, United States Marine Corps, and#34;Unconstitutional War: Strategic Risk in the Age of Congressional Abdicationand#34;, Parameters, Summer, http://strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/parameters/articles/2011summer/gallagher.pdf Clausewitz asserted war is politics by other means. Therefore, in the American democracy Congress can punt the blame —- only declarations force sobering assessments of warTroutman 5 – Russell Troutman, JD, Attorney, Former President of the Florida Bar, and#34;The Power to Declare Warand#34;, 12-27, http://www.troutmanwilliams.com/the-power-to-declare-war/ Such resolute and stirring phraseology is not characteristic of those declarations with which Congress has abdicated its war-making responsibilities. These resolutions are adroitly phrased, so that if the war is successful, AND Plan stops unrestricted use of PGS Nevertheless, airpower — including such offshore strike capabilities as submarine-launched cruise missiles However, blurring the distinction between non-nuclear strategic weapons and strategic nuclear warheads Formal constraints key to solve pre-emption modeling This provision is at the heart of the ongoing war powers debate, with intense | 10/4/13 |
Risk K - 2AC - Texas 7Tournament: Texas | Round: 7 | Opponent: Texas CM | Judge: Smelko Heuristic GoodHendrick says even if we solve nothing about Pres Powers, we’re still a model designed to tackle a laundry list of public issues. Here’s proof heuristics solve best:Rachlinski – quoting Gigerenzer – ’12 The concept that heuristics are rational adaptations has been taken up with the most vigor Apocalyptic Rhetoric( ) K’s of Security, Fear, and Exaggeration are all wrong. The better mistake’s to err with us.Kroenig ’12 Should we worry about the spread of nuclear weapons? At first glance, this Magnitude FirstHigh magnitude, low probability events first – aggregate probability meets your framework, math yo, scientific uncertaintyBostrom 13
Prediction/Complexity Pessimismbad=== Prediction and complexity pessimism bad. Approximation’s useful.Chernoff 9, Framing point – their ev assumes standards for academic SOCIAL SCIENCE, not policymaking.Chernoff ’9 Certainly, it is true that the social sciences are not natural sciences. While ( ) K of linear model too sweeping and wrong.Chernoff ’5 A-to Communication Strategist/Kinsella( ) "Flow of Communication" Framework bad. Risks distancing of policy praxis – cementing violence.Themba ’12 Bottomline: big ticket "strategic" communications is often isolated from organizing work and Isaac – Util/Ethics( ) No, not ethics disad – consequencesIssac, ’2 Scholarship 1st 2AC( ) Their "scholarship" standard becomes academic religion – doesn’t guide a better world.Lake 11 These ?ve pathologies combine to divert professional debate from the substance of world politics to | 2/9/14 |
Rutgers K - 1AR - Wake 3Tournament: Wake | Round: 3 | Opponent: Rutgers RS | Judge: Harper, Allison SSDSwitch-side "anti-logic" best teaches BOTH TEAMS how to counter-racism and oppression in immediate AND long-term contexts. Aff pre-empts don’t apply, as our offense is NOT solely procedural.INOUE ’5 Sophistic antilogic and a slightly altered version of dialectic, as heuristics, can be Situated KnowStandpoint epistemology too sweeping – dominant standpoint can emancipate and oppressed standpoint can entrench suffering.Dépelteau ’8 Critical theory is not only an anti-positivistic attack against neutral, ’pure’ ConseqEthics 1st wrong – utility is net more ethicalWilliams ’5 A commitment to an ethic of consequences reflects a deeper ethic of criticism, of SextonSexton cements a Black-White dichotomy and hampers inter-sectionalitySpickard ’9 StateShunning "bad actors" fails and makes things worse.Heller ’9 WildersonWilderson wrong and loses to contingency. Fixed ontology too pessimistic and can be reversed.Hudson ’13 Thus the self-same/other distinction is necessary for the possibility of identity | 11/16/13 |
Rutgers K - 2AC - Wake 3Tournament: Wake | Round: 3 | Opponent: Rutgers RS | Judge: Harper, Allison 2AC Passive Voice; perm( ) Defense – solves K’s of the State.Hester ’13 "The USFG should..." should no longer be unproblematically accepted as the starting point A-to Wise Ev( ) Their Wise ev doesn’t contextualize – it’s about WHITE COLLEGE STUDENTS FLAUNTING DRUG LAWS… Not academic Heuristics.Wise ’9 Now don’t misunderstand, I’ve indulged my fair share of weed, and I’m not RitterDoes a neg ballot solve their framework’s broader goals ?. Presumption should be "no".Ritter ’13 Many students who participate in comp etitive interscholastic debate in high school and college 20 A-to Fasching
Categorical obligations bad. Not ethics disad, consequences best.Issac, ’2 ( ) Universalization Turn – Fasching’s obligation too sweeping and does violence.Moore, Professor of Theology at Valparaiso University, -2K Heuristic vs. "Fiat Not Real"/Aff does nothingTwo – We’re vertical constraint through the public sphere.Lobel ’89 These changes would supplement and ultimately transform traditional separation of power restraints. The constitutional Three – Awareness. We may spur macro-change. If we don’t, our Aff still boosts awareness. This beats framework distinctions by helping the debate-space adjust to Executive surveillance:Young – quoting Stewart – ’13 About six months ago, my assistant debate coaches and I decided that it would be a good idea to craft a justification paper to persuade the NDT-CEDA college policy debate community to debate the proper limits of AND, as these students’ opinions will stand as an important potential check on the presidency. Hendrick says even if we solve nothing about Pres Powers, we’re still a model designed to tackle a laundry list of public issues. Here’s proof heuristics solve best:Rachlinski – quoting Gigerenzer – ’12 The concept that heuristics are rational adaptations has been taken up with the most vigor Heuristic Solves Racism( ) Our Heuristic breaks-down racist power structures. If they win the State or Debate’s racist – we still best teach how to re-assign that power.INOUE ’5 Gutherie’s definition of nomos helps us also see the nomos-physis debate as one 2AC – Add-on RacismUnless POTUS authority declines via the Aff, racist interventions will increase.Grynaviski ’13 Second, this conception rightly focuses us outward, rather than inward. The current State/Civil Society not Always Racist – WallWe’ll house the debate over whether the State is categorically racist here:Framing point ~23 1 – Universal v. particularToo sweeping to say working-through-State never counters racism – here’s 7 concrete examples:Seligman ’11 Litigation as a tool for social change has a long and proud tradition in the Here’s more ev that State-reformism can work:Omi’13 In Feagin and Elias’s account, white racist rule in the USA appears unalterable and The offensive impact is that State-Pessimism causes racism. Since they don’t endorse the USFG, this is also an independent reason to prefer us on T.Jones ’99 An even more troubling feature of Adorno and Horkheimer’s analysis is the downplaying of individual Wilderson Frontline( ) Wilderson’s too pessimistic – this reifies his own K and locks-in the worst oppression.Marriott ’12 Whatever one might think of the cogency of these remarks (if only because the (Note: the word "manichean" in this context means "a disparaging course of action that involves an overly-simplistic) choice between good and evil) Afro-futurism 1NCOur Afro-futurism disad – Afro-pessimism and Afro-futurism trade-off. Proves fiated imaginations are GOOD and progressivism can successfully strive against anti-blacknessAker ’12 And as of late, I’ve been framing Afro-Pessimism and Afro-Futurism A2: Ongoing Nuclear WarPlan’s key to both positive and negative peace —- unchecked war powers cause a permanent state of executive militarism that crushes rights, civil liberties, and dissent —- that’s Weinberger and BarronIntervention directly kills which should be rejected —- and causes wider conflict that blocks positive peaceMiall ’99 (Hugh, Et Al., Reader in Peace and Conflict Research and Director of the Institute for Peace Studies - U Lancaster, Contemporary Conflict Resolution: The Prevention, Management, and Transformation of Deadly Conflicts p.222-3) We hope that this book has shown that the founders of the conflict resolution approach This turns the K —- more than they turn the caseGoldstein 1 – Josh Goldstein, Professor of Int’l Relations, American University, War and Gender, p. 412 First, peace activists face a dilemma in thinking about causes of war and working | 11/16/13 |
Syria DA - 1AR - Harvard 3Tournament: Harvard | Round: 3 | Opponent: Kansas BC | Judge: Hardy Congress will authorize force —- boosts credible deterrence —- causes cavesDershowitz 13 – Alan M. Dershowitz, Professor of Law at Harvard Law School, "Obama: Get Approval From Congress on Iran Now", Haaretz, 9-5, http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-1.545430 President Obama should ask Congress for authorization now to take military action against Iran’s nuclear Makes negotiations credible by demonstrating resolve —- Congress won’t blockSmith 12 – Jeffrey H. Smith, Former General Counsel of the Central Intelligence Agency and John B. Bellinger III, Adjunct Senior Fellow for International and National Security Law at the Council on Foreign Relations and Partner at Arnold 26 Porter LLP, "Providing a Legal Basis to Attack Iran", Washington Post, 9-27, http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2012-09-27/opinions/35497254_1_military-force-president-obama-iran With respect to U.S. law, the president must rely on either | 11/5/13 |
Syria DA - 2AC - Harvard 3Tournament: Harvard | Round: 3 | Opponent: Kansas BC | Judge: Hardy No resolve on Syria nowCordesman 13 – Anthony Cordesman 9/1/13, holds the Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) in Washington, D.C., "President Obama and Syria: The ’Waiting for Godot’ Strategy," http://csis.org/publication/president-obama-and-syria-waiting-godot-strategy-http://csis.org/publication/president-obama-and-syria-waiting-godot-strategy Instead, the Administration first rushed into the kind of rhetoric you only use if ====Authorization makes threats credible==== Other scholars have recently pointed to the special role of legislative bodies in signaling with End around — lack of prior participation causes interference in duration and conduct of warBarron 8 – David J. Barron, Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and Martin S. Lederman, Visiting Professor of Law at the Georgetown University Law Center, "The Commander in Chief at the Lowest Ebb — A Constitutional History", Harvard Law Review, February, 121 Harv. L. Rev. 941, Lexis By the conclusion of the Clinton Administration, however, it appeared that something of Negotiating power —- Congressional support boosts resolve by showing unified support for war —- that’s Webb and Gelb —- solves the DADueck 10 – Colin Dueck, Associate Professor of Public and International Affairs at George Mason University, "Regaining a Realistic Foreign Policy", Policy Review, No. 162, 8-1, http://www.hoover.org/publications/policy-review/article/43426 Fifth, think of diplomacy as simply one tool in America’s foreign policy toolkit, Even the worst scenario of regime transition won’t cause a prolonged civil warSalem, 11 (Paul Salem 12/2/11 (Paul Salem is the director of the Carnegie Middle East Center in Beirut, Lebanon. He works and publishes on the regional and international relations of the Middle East as well as issues of political development and democratization in the Arab world, "The Next Move for Syria" http://carnegieendowment.org/2011/12/02/next-move-for-syria/8kim) If, however, the regime collapses and Syria divides into rival communities—perhaps | 11/5/13 |
Syria Strikes Good DA and CP - 1AR - Wake 6Tournament: Wake | Round: 6 | Opponent: Georgetown AM | Judge: Brossmann Extra-ConPrez will circumvent in a crisis but generally complyMargulies 11 – Joseph Margulies, Clinical Professor at the Northwestern University School of Law, and Hope Metcalf, Lecturer at Yale Law School, "Terrorizing Academia", Journal of Legal Education, 60(3), February, p. 446-447 Proceduralists viewed emergency overreactions as both regrettable and inevitable.54 "Times of heightened CP’s exemption snowballs —- extra-constitutional action doesn’tSinner 10 – Aaron Sinner, Political Science at College of Saint Benedict and Saint John’s University, "Placing Prerogative Outside the Constitution", Fall, http://www.csbsju.edu/Documents/Political20Science/pdf/Sinner5B15D.pdf The first major trade-off between Jefferson’s extraconstitutional view and Hamilton’s constitutional view is Iran ProlifThreats are the primary motivation for prolif—-pressure failsAkinbiyi 12 – Ani Akinbiyi, MPA from the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs at Princeton University, et al, Faculty Advisors: Frank Von Hippel, Hossein Mousavian, and R. Scott Kemp, "Preventing a Nuclear-Armed Iran: A Phased Grand Agenda", January, http://wws.princeton.edu/research/pwreports_fy11/Preventing-a-Nuclear-Armed-Iran.pdf Overview For over a decade, Iran and the international community have engaged in an Pressure can only slow, not stop breakout—-resolving underlying motives is keyKemp 13 – R. Scott Kemp, Assistant Professor of Nuclear Science and Engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, "Iran’s Nuclear Program: The Case for Engagement", Assessment of the Nuclear Programs of Iran and North Korea, Ed. Kang, p. 83-84 2.2 Option 2: The Status Quo: Deny Iran a Weapons-Making Capability Through Intelligence, Covert Operations, and Sanctions | 11/21/13 |
Syria Strikes Good DA and CP - 2AC - Wake 6Tournament: Wake | Round: 6 | Opponent: Georgetown AM | Judge: Brossmann Congress won’t block Syria strikesMorrissey 13 – Ed Morrissey, Senior Editor at Hot Air, "Will Obama Go to Congress Before Attacking Syria?", Hot Air, 8-27, http://hotair.com/archives/2013/08/27/will-obama-go-to-congress-before-attacking-syria/ The White House is mulling over a plan that would involve at least a couple Extra-constitutional action solves extreme short-term threats —- President can violate and get approval later —- that’s Lobel. Solves the DA but avoids spilloverPosner 10 – Eric A. Posner, Professor at the University of Chicago School of Law, "Executive Decision", The New Republic, 3-29, http://www.newrepublic.com/book/review/executive-decision Imagine that U.S. agents nab a terrorist who knows the location of Prolif’s accelerating, despite threatsKahlili 13 – Reza Kahlili, Former CIA operative in Iran’s Revolutionary Guards and Author of the Award-Winning Book A Time to Betray, Serves on the Task Force on National and Homeland Security and the Advisory Board of the Foundation for Democracy in Iran, "Experts Concerned Iran Nuclear Progress Is Accelerating", 4-1, http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/04/experts_concerned_iran_nuclear_progress_is_accelerating.html The revelation of a vast secret nuclear site in Iran just as the world powers | 11/21/13 |
T Armed Forced - 2AC - Wake 8Tournament: Wake | Round: 8 | Opponent: NU OP | Judge: Andres Gannon "Armed forces" includes the military, contractors, and others engaged in hostilities under the direction of the U.S.OLC 80 – Office of Legal Council, "Presidential Power to Use the Armed Forces Abroad Without Statutory Authorization", http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/jbalkin/cases/4aOpOffLegalCounsel185.pdf The provision most closely on point is § 1547(c), which defines the PMCs are topical—-a broad interpretation is bestAvant 5 – Professor Deborah Avant, Director, Institute for Global and International Studies, The Elliott School of International Affairs, George Washington University, et al., University Centre for International Humanitarian Law, Geneva, "Expert Meeting on Private Military Contractors: Status and State Responsibility For Their Actions", 8-29, http://www.geneva-academy.ch/docs/expert-meetings/2005/2rapport_compagnies_privees.pdf Similarly, this expert wondered whether the term "armed forces" is broader under | 12/14/13 |
T Armed Forces Humans - 2AC - Clay 2Tournament: Clay | Round: 2 | Opponent: Cal SW | Judge: Roark "Armed Forces" means 5 branches of the militaryBusch 9 – Philip B. Busch, Office of Chief Counsel, "Employment Authorization and Verification of Aliens Enlisting in the Armed Forces ~74 FR 7993~ ~FR 14-09~", http://www.uscis.gov/ilink/docView/FR/HTML/FR/0-0-0-1/0-0-0-186558/0-0-0-199368/0-0-0-199448.html I. Background and Purpose Section 504 of Title 10, U.S. That includes both humans and weapons —- they’re outdatedBejesky 12 – Robert Bejesky, M.A. Political Science (Michigan), M.A. Applied Economics (Michigan), LL.M. International Law (Georgetown), "Precedent Supporting the Constitutionality of Section 5(b) of the War Powers Resolution", Willamette Law Review, Fall, 49 Willamette L. Rev. 1, Lexis The WPR does not differentiate between projectiles and soldier incursions. The WPR generally applies | 10/5/13 |
T Authority - 2AC - USC 4Tournament: USC | Round: 4 | Opponent: UNLV RV | Judge: Nikolic "War powers authority" is only authorization of war, NOT "Commander in Chief"—-they unlimitHeidt 13 – Stephen Heidt, Ph.D. Candidate in Communication at Georgia State University, "A Memorandum on the Topic Area", 5-29, http://www.cedadebate.org/forum/index.php?topic=4846.0 A Presidential War Powers topic is already EXTREMELY narrow. First, the topic committee Plan restricts war powersAdler 13 – David Adler, Professor of Political Science at Idaho State University, Idaho Statesman, 3-14, http://www.idahostatesman.com/2013/03/14/2490377/congress-needs-to-restrict-presidents.html David Adler: Congress needs to restrict president’s war powers The ongoing controversies surrounding President | 1/4/14 |
T Contractors - 1AR - Harvard 3Tournament: Harvard | Round: 3 | Opponent: Kansas BC | Judge: Hardy PMCs are part of ’armed forces’—-meets core criteriaBosch 7 – Shannon Bosch, Senior Lecturer in the Faculty of Law at the University of KwaZulu-Natal and Attorney of the High Court of South Africa, "Private Security Contractors and International Humanitarian Law – A Skirmish for Recognition in International Armed Conflicts", African Security Review, 16(4), p. 37-38 What then of PSCs? Can they be considered combatants in accordance with these provisions "Armed forces" includes support and paramilitary forcesPing 5 – Jonathan H. Ping, Professor of Humanities and Social Sciences at Bond University, Middle Power Statecraft: Indonesia, Malaysia, and the Asia Pacific, p. 66 Military Expenditure (Table 3.3). ’In the Military Balance ~source for Only our interpretation matches the reality of warChen 12 – Julia Chen, JD Candidate at Boston College Law, "Restoring Constitutional Balance: Accommodating the Evolution of War", Boston College Law Review, http://bclawreview.org/files/2012/11/03_chen.pdf-http://bclawreview.org/files/2012/11/03_chen.pdf Although there is no definition section in the War Powers Resolution or explanation of its | 11/5/13 |
T Contractors - 2AC - Harvard 3Tournament: Harvard | Round: 3 | Opponent: Kansas BC | Judge: Hardy "Armed forces" includes the military, contractors, and others engaged in hostilities under the direction of the U.S.OLC 80 – Office of Legal Council, "Presidential Power to Use the Armed Forces Abroad Without Statutory Authorization", http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/jbalkin/cases/4aOpOffLegalCounsel185.pdf The provision most closely on point is § 1547(c), which defines the PMCs are topical—-a broad interpretation is bestAvant 5 – Professor Deborah Avant, Director, Institute for Global and International Studies, The Elliott School of International Affairs, George Washington University, et al., University Centre for International Humanitarian Law, Geneva, "Expert Meeting on Private Military Contractors: Status and State Responsibility For Their Actions", 8-29, http://www.geneva-academy.ch/docs/expert-meetings/2005/2rapport_compagnies_privees.pdf Similarly, this expert wondered whether the term "armed forces" is broader under | 11/5/13 |
T Hostilities - 1AR - UK RR 8Tournament: UK RR | Round: 8 | Opponent: Oklahoma LM | Judge: Hall, Sherry We MeetWe meet – "hostilities" covers "acts of war"McDonald 4 3.1 What is meant by the term ’hostilities’?¶ Hostilities has a PredictabilityThis is the common sense and consensus legal opinionO’Connell 11 – Mary Ellen O’Connell, Research Professor of International Dispute Resolution at the Kroc Institute for Peace Studies at the University of Notre Dame, "U.S. Strains Credibility on its Libya Role", CNN, 6-21, http://www.cnn.com/2011/OPINION/06/21/oconnell.libya.military/index.html In addition to torture, international law defines "armed conflict" and "hostilities": | 10/4/13 |
T Hostilities - 2AC - UK RR 8Tournament: UK RR | Round: 8 | Opponent: Oklahoma LM | Judge: Hall, Sherry We meet – "Warfare" is "hostilities"Goldsmith 11 I. Warfare from a Distance¶ The Administration argues that once it starts firing Counter-interp – "Hostilities" means armed conflict – predictable and sets a fair limitDavids 11 – Joseph William Davids, Research Fellow at La Sapienza, Università di Roma, JD from the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law and LLM in International and European Law from the Universiteit van Amsterdam, ""Hostilities" and "Armed Conflict"", Arizona International, 6-19, http://davidsjoseph.wordpress.com/2011/06/19/hostilities-and-armed-conflict/ International Humanitarian Law applies during armed conflicts, which exist "whenever there is a | 10/4/13 |
T Restriction - 2AC - CSUF DubsTournament: CSUF | Round: Doubles | Opponent: Kentucky GR | Judge: JP, Hardy, Lucas-Bolin Plan restricts the President’s authority over initiation of hostilitiesKeynes 10 – Edward Keynes, Professor of Political Science at Penn State University, Undeclared War: Twilight Zone of Constitutional Power, p. 163-164 Although the zones of exclusive legislative and executive authority cannot be defined precisely, the "Restriction" means limitationMattice 7 (Harry S., Jr., United States District Judge, "Wright v. Magellan Behavioral Health, Inc.", 7-3, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48718, Lexis) In the instant case, the Court is required to interpret the word "restriction" as used by the parties in the Agreement. The parties apparently agree that the legal definition of restriction—"a limitation or qualification," Black’s Law Dictionary 1341 (8th ed. 1999)—is a good place to start. Thus, the Court must determine whether the board’s supervision requirement falls within this definition. | 1/8/14 |
T Restriction - 2AC - Texas 3Tournament: Texas | Round: 3 | Opponent: Georgetown ErMc | Judge: Katsulas Plan restricts the President’s authority over initiation of hostilitiesKeynes 10 – Edward Keynes, Professor of Political Science at Penn State University, Undeclared War: Twilight Zone of Constitutional Power, p. 163-164 Although the zones of exclusive legislative and executive authority cannot be defined precisely, the "Restriction" means limitationMattice 7 (Harry S., Jr., United States District Judge, "Wright v. Magellan Behavioral Health, Inc.", 7-3, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48718, Lexis) In the instant case, the Court is required to interpret the word "restriction" as used by the parties in the Agreement. The parties apparently agree that the legal definition of restriction—"a limitation or qualification," Black’s Law Dictionary 1341 (8th ed. 1999)—is a good place to start. Thus, the Court must determine whether the board’s supervision requirement falls within this definition. | 2/8/14 |
T Restriction is Binding - 2AC - Indiana 7Tournament: Indiana | Round: 7 | Opponent: Michigan CP | Judge: Hingstman Plan restricts the President’s authority over initiation of hostilitiesKeynes 10 – Edward Keynes, Professor of Political Science at Penn State University, Undeclared War: Twilight Zone of Constitutional Power, p. 163-164 Although the zones of exclusive legislative and executive authority cannot be defined precisely, the "Restriction" means limitationMattice 7 (Harry S., Jr., United States District Judge, "Wright v. Magellan Behavioral Health, Inc.", 7-3, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48718, Lexis) In the instant case, the Court is required to interpret the word "restriction" as used by the parties in the Agreement. The parties apparently agree that the legal definition of restriction—"a limitation or qualification," Black’s Law Dictionary 1341 (8th ed. 1999)—is a good place to start. Thus, the Court must determine whether the board’s supervision requirement falls within this definition. | 1/26/14 |
T Restrictions - 2AC - Harvard 1Tournament: Harvard | Round: 1 | Opponent: Wayne JS | Judge: Susko Plan restricts the President’s authority over initiation of hostilitiesKeynes 10 – Edward Keynes, Professor of Political Science at Penn State University, Undeclared War: Twilight Zone of Constitutional Power, p. 163-164 Although the zones of exclusive legislative and executive authority cannot be defined precisely, the "Restriction" means limitationMattice 7 (Harry S., Jr., United States District Judge, "Wright v. Magellan Behavioral Health, Inc.", 7-3, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48718, Lexis) In the instant case, the Court is required to interpret the word "restriction" as used by the parties in the Agreement. The parties apparently agree that the legal definition of restriction—"a limitation or qualification," Black’s Law Dictionary 1341 (8th ed. 1999)—is a good place to start. Thus, the Court must determine whether the board’s supervision requirement falls within this definition. | 10/26/13 |
T Single Country - 2AC - Wake QTournament: Wake | Round: Quarters | Opponent: Northwestern MV | Judge: Seth Gannon, Kallmyer, Brovero, Weiner, Feldman "Authority" is permissionTaylor 96 – Ellen, 21 Del. J. Corp. L. 870 (1996), Hein Online) The term authority is commonly thought of in the context of the law of agency We meetRitter 7 – Scott Ritter, Former Marine Intelligence Officer and Chief Weapons Inspector for the United Nations in Iraq from 1991 to 1998, "Calling on Congress to Stop a War", TruthDig, 12-7, http://www.truthdig.com/report/print/20071207_calling_on_congress_to_stop_a_war In short, the only way to prevent the full implementation of the Bush administration "Restriction" means limitationMattice 7 (Harry S., Jr., United States District Judge, "Wright v. Magellan Behavioral Health, Inc.", 7-3, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48718, Lexis) In the instant case, the Court is required to interpret the word "restriction" as used by the parties in the Agreement. The parties apparently agree that the legal definition of restriction—"a limitation or qualification," Black’s Law Dictionary 1341 (8th ed. 1999)—is a good place to start. Thus, the Court must determine whether the board’s supervision requirement falls within this definition. "Substantial" means largeRandom House 13 – Random House Dictionary, "substantially", http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/substantially?s=t sub•stan•tial ~suhb-stan-shuhl~ Show IPA adjective 1. of ample or considerable amount, quantity, size, etc.: a substantial sum of money. | 12/14/13 |
T WPA - 2AC - Harvard 3Tournament: Harvard | Round: 3 | Opponent: Kansas BC | Judge: Hardy "War powers authority" is only authorization of war, NOT "Commander in Chief"—-they unlimitHeidt 13 – Stephen Heidt, Ph.D. Candidate in Communication at Georgia State University, "A Memorandum on the Topic Area", 5-29, http://www.cedadebate.org/forum/index.php?topic=4846.0 A Presidential War Powers topic is already EXTREMELY narrow. First, the topic committee Plan restricts war powersAdler 13 – David Adler, Professor of Political Science at Idaho State University, Idaho Statesman, 3-14, http://www.idahostatesman.com/2013/03/14/2490377/congress-needs-to-restrict-presidents.html David Adler: Congress needs to restrict president’s war powers The ongoing controversies surrounding President | 11/5/13 |
T Weapons - 1AR - USC 4Tournament: USC | Round: 4 | Opponent: UNLV RV | Judge: Nikolic W/mWe meet – "hostilities" covers "acts of war"McDonald 4 3.1 What is meant by the term ’hostilities’?¶ Hostilities has a Interpretation 1AR"Armed Forces" means 5 branches of the militaryBusch 9 – Philip B. Busch, Office of Chief Counsel, "Employment Authorization and Verification of Aliens Enlisting in the Armed Forces ~74 FR 7993~ ~FR 14-09~", http://www.uscis.gov/ilink/docView/FR/HTML/FR/0-0-0-1/0-0-0-186558/0-0-0-199368/0-0-0-199448.html I. Background and Purpose Section 504 of Title 10, U.S. Includes strategic forces and equipmentTMB, 13 (The Military Balance, Explanatory Notes 113:1, p. 558, Taylor 26 Francis Online) NATO’s definition of military expenditure, the most comprehensive, is defined as the cash OutdatedIncludes weapons —- their interp’s datedManuel 12 The Second Amendment to the Constitution prevents the government from infringing individual rights to keep Most predictable and precise—-their interpretation’s absurdHolan 11 (Angie Drobnic Holan and Louis Jacobson, June 22, 2011, "Are U.S. actions in Libya subject to the War Powers Resolution? A review of the evidence," Politifact, http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2011/jun/22/are-us-actions-libya-subject-war-powers-resolution/-http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2011/jun/22/are-us-actions-libya-subject-war-powers-resolution/) When is dropping bombs on another country not considered "hostilities"? That question is | 1/4/14 |
T Weapons - 2AC - USC 4Tournament: USC | Round: 4 | Opponent: UNLV RV | Judge: Nikolic "Armed Forces" means humans and weapons of the 5 branchesUS Code 96 (10 USCS § 111, "Title 10. Armed Forces Subtitle a. General Military Law Part i. Organization and General Military Powers Chapter 2. Department of Defense", Act Sept. 23, 1996, p.l. 104-201, Div A, Title IX, Subtitle B, §§ 921-926, 110 Stat. 2623, Sec. 921. ’Military Force Structure Review Act of 1996’, Lexis) "Sec. 926. Definitions. "In this subtitle: "(1 They’re outdated and absurdBejesky 12 – Robert Bejesky, M.A. Political Science (Michigan), M.A. Applied Economics (Michigan), LL.M. International Law (Georgetown), "Precedent Supporting the Constitutionality of Section 5(b) of the War Powers Resolution", Willamette Law Review, Fall, 49 Willamette L. Rev. 1, Lexis The WPR does not differentiate between projectiles and soldier incursions. The WPR generally applies | 1/4/14 |
TPA Politics - 1AR - CSUF DubsTournament: CSUF | Round: Doubles | Opponent: Kentucky GR | Judge: JP, Hardy, Lucas-Bolin EU/US RelationsNo impact to US/European relationsHaas 11 (Richard, President – Council on Foreign Relations, Lecturer in Public Policy – Harvard University and D.Phil – University of Oxford, "Why Europe No Longer Matters", 6-17, http://www.cfr.org/europerussia/why-europe-no-longer-matters/p25308) Gates sounded a pessimistic note, warning of "the real possibility for a dim TPP Not T of DIt’s not going to wrap up until 2015Bernama News, 12-27-2013 http://www.bernama.com.my/bernama/v7/bu/newsbusiness.php?id=1003782-http://www.bernama.com.my/bernama/v7/bu/newsbusiness.php?id=1003782 The ambitious 21st Century free trade agreement being negotiated among 12 countries in the Pacific Rim including Malaysia, is widely expected to culminate in a successful conclusion as early as 2015. Ext. Obamacare ThumperObamacare makes PC ineffective- hurts job approvalJoseph Weber, Fox News, 1-1-2014 http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/01/01/after-rough-year-obama-looks-for-2014-comeback-amid-some-unsolicited-new-year/-http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/01/01/after-rough-year-obama-looks-for-2014-comeback-amid-some-unsolicited-new-year/ However, Obama’s political power began to wane soon after, starting with his failed | 1/8/14 |
TPA Politics DA - 2AC - CSUF DubsTournament: CSUF | Round: Doubles | Opponent: Kentucky GR | Judge: JP, Hardy, Lucas-Bolin Not top of the docketThe failure of the talks to reach agreement is a major blow for the US, which hoped to see the deal largely wrapped up by now. The ministers say they’ll meet again next month, but haven’t set any new timeline for completion. And with many of the outstanding issues having been aired for months, it’s hard to see how full agreement will be reached any time soon. No DA- Obama not pushing, TPA won’t pass and international deals fail inevitabilityThe Obama administration failed to meet its self-imposed deadline of Dec. 31 He’s not effectively using PCPresident Barack Obama wants the power to negotiate free-trade treaties on a fast Minimum wage, UI, Obamacare, NSA, debt ceiling thump the DA and winners winMSNBC, 1-6-2013 http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/obama-prepares-hit-reset President Obama returns to work this week looking to revive his second term and regain Your internal link says that more than just TPA is key to trade—DA can’t solveRiley-Senior Analyst Trade Policy, Heritage-4/16/13 In the 2002 Bipartisan Trade Promotion Authority Act, Congress—whose role in formulating U.S. trade policy includes defining trade negotiation objectives—made it clear that No trade impactFletcher, 11 (Ian Fletcher is Senior Economist of the Coalition for a Prosperous America, former Research Fellow at the U.S. Business and Industry Council M.A. and B.A. from Columbia and U Chicago, "Avoid Trade War? We’re Already In One21" August 29 2011 www.huffingtonpost.com/ian-fletcher/avoid-trade-war-were-alre_b_939967.html-http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ian-fletcher/avoid-trade-war-were-alre_b_939967.html) The curious thing about the concept of trade war is that, unlike actual shooting | 1/8/14 |
UN DA - 1AR - Harvard 1Tournament: Harvard | Round: 1 | Opponent: Wayne JS | Judge: Susko A2: UN Credibility NB – Ext – Congress Won’t BlockCongress will say yesSamples, 11 (John, director of the Center for Representative Government at the Cato Institute, "Congress Surrenders the War Powers Libya, the United Nations, and the Constitution", Policy Analysis 687, CATO, http://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/pa687.pdf-http://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/pa687.pdf) Secretary of Defense William Cohen claimed a right to carry out airstrikes to protect ethnic A2: Congress Blocks UN-Style Link Turns – 1AR – Plan Consistent with UN TreatyTheir link proves Congress would pull the plug mid-stream—-that’s worseMcGuinness 9 – Margaret E. McGuinness, Associate Professor at the University of Missouri Law School, "The President, Congress and The Security Council: Counterterrorism And The Use Of Force Through The Internationalist Lens", Willamette Law Review, 45 Willamette L. Rev. 417, Spring, Lexis Finally, the strongest argument for more robust and ongoing congressional participation in Council military Plan Key Effective UN OperationsUnitary force isn’t credible without prior Congressional approval—-threat of reversal undermines the President’s commitmentLinn 00 – Alexander C. Linn, JD from William 26 Mary School of Law, "International Security and the War Powers Resolution", William 26 Mary Bill of Rights Journal, April, 8 Wm. 26 Mary Bill of Rts. J. 725, Lexis Foreign policy considerations demand that American forces be rapidly deployable, but a well- Congress Key UN LegitimacyCongressional involvement creates democratic norms that spill up to cause UN procedural reform—-vital to legitimacyMcGuinness 9 – Margaret E. McGuinness, Associate Professor at the University of Missouri Law School, "The President, Congress and The Security Council: Counterterrorism And The Use Of Force Through The Internationalist Lens", Willamette Law Review, 45 Willamette L. Rev. 417, Spring, Lexis III. Congressional Participation in U.N. Counterterrorism Policy and the Democracy Deficit | 10/26/13 |
UN DA - 2AC - Harvard 1Tournament: Harvard | Round: 1 | Opponent: Wayne JS | Judge: Susko Congress won’t blockTurner, 2 (Robert F. – Co–director of the Center for VIII. CONCLUSIONS Where does all of this leave us? What, if anything Plan’s 100 consistent with obligations to the UNFisher 97 – Louis Fisher, Senior Specialist in Separation of Powers, Congressional Research Service, The Library of Congress, "Sidestepping Congress: Presidents Acting Under the UN and NATO", Case Western Reserve University, Summer, 47 Case W. Res. 1237, Lexis III. The UN Participation Act The UN Charter states that whenever there is a | 10/26/13 |
UN DA - 2AC - UK RR 2Tournament: UK RR | Round: 2 | Opponent: Michigan AP | Judge: Hardy Congress won’t blockTurner, 2 (Robert F. – Co–director of the Center for VIII. CONCLUSIONS Where does all of this leave us? What, if anything Intervention backfires —- destroys multilateral co-op that solves better and pushes states into repressive spheres of influence —- also risks miscalc and great power conflictTrombly 11 – Dan Trombly, Ph.D. Candidate in International Affairs at George Washington University, and#34;Responsibility to Protect Ya Neckand#34;, 9-3, http://fearhonorinterest.wordpress.com/2011/09/03/responsibility-to-protect-ya-neck/ Advocates should recognize that the world is more peaceful now than it has ever been | 10/4/13 |
UN PIC - 1AR - Harvard 1Tournament: Harvard | Round: 1 | Opponent: Wayne JS | Judge: Susko United Nations PIC – Ext – Not Solve WarfightingUN authorization without Congress wrecks unity, morale, and political support for warStromseth 93 – Jane E. Stromseth, Associate Professor of Law at the Georgetown University Law Center, "Rethinking War Powers: Congress, the President, and the United Nations", Georgetown Law Journal, March, 81 Geo. L.J. 597, Lexis 5. Some Lessons of the Korean "Police Action" The Korean experience exposed | 10/26/13 |
UN PIC - 2AC - Harvard 1Tournament: Harvard | Round: 1 | Opponent: Wayne JS | Judge: Susko Warfighting turns this—-actions structurally fail without prior Congressional approval—-incoherent strategies, morale, allied backlash—-political support dries up and causes cut-and-run—-that’s Gallagher, Frye, and Gelb—-turns the UNSpaid 92 – Brian M. Spaid, JD, Member with Dale Woodard Law Firm, "Collective Security v. Constitutional Sovereignty: Can the President Commit U.S. Troops Under the Sanction of the United Nations Security Council Without Congressional Approval?", University of Dayton Law Review, Spring, 17 Dayton L. Rev. 1055, Lexis B. The Decline in Congressional Influence over Presidential War Powers 1. Congress in End around—-lack of support causes back-end interference—-triggers the linkStromseth 95 – Jane E. Stromseth, Associate Professor of Law at the Georgetown University Law Center, "Collective Force and Constitutional Responsibility: War Powers in the Post-Cold War Era", University of Miami, October, 50 U. Miami L. Rev. 145, Lexis IV. Conclusion If Somalia and Haiti are any guide, we can expect to Lack of transparent legitimacy wrecks UN effectiveness—-plan solvesMcGuinness 9 – Margaret E. McGuinness, Associate Professor at the University of Missouri Law School, "The President, Congress and The Security Council: Counterterrorism And The Use Of Force Through The Internationalist Lens", Willamette Law Review, 45 Willamette L. Rev. 417, Spring, Lexis This symposium is focused on the powers of the U.S. presidency, | 10/26/13 |
UN PIC - 2AC - UK RR 2Tournament: UK RR | Round: 2 | Opponent: Michigan AP | Judge: Hardy Ruins solvencyLobel 95 – Jules Lobel, Professor at University of Pittsburgh Law School, and#34;and#34;Little Warsand#34; and the Constitutionand#34;, University of Miami Law Review, October, 50 U. Miami L. Rev. 61, Lexis IV. Procedural v. Substantive Reform Approaches Professor Ely and I start from the CP creates a loophole that dilutes the normNowrot 98 – Karsten Nowrot, LL.M., Indiana University School of Law – Bloomington, and Emily W. Schabacker, B.A. McGill University (Canada); M.A., University of East Anglia (England); J.D., Indiana University School of Law-Bloomington, and#34;The Use of Force to Restore Democracy: International Legal Implications of the ECOWAS Intervention in Sierra Leoneand#34;, American University International Law Review, 14 Am. U. Int’l L. Rev. 321, Lexis A legal construction excluding the use of force for and#34;benign endsand#34; n108 from Especially true of UN authorizationFisher 8 – Louis Fisher, Specialist in Constitutional Law at the Law Library of the Library of Congress, and#34;War Powers for the 21st Century: The Constitutional Perspectiveand#34;, Testimony Before the Subcommittee on International Organizations, Human Rights, and Oversight, House Committee on Foreign Affairs, 4-10, http://loc.gov/law/help/usconlaw/pdf/war-fa-2008.pdf V. UN Military Operations Section 2(b) of H. J. CP gets exploited to justify all interventions—especially true for ObamaSamples, 11 (John, director of the Center for Representative Government at the Cato Institute, and#34;Congress Surrenders the War Powers Libya, the United Nations, and the Constitutionand#34;, Policy Analysis 687, CATO, http://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/pa687.pdf-http://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/pa687.pdf) What will the future practice of limited wars look like? Libya is a limited | 10/4/13 |
WPCA CP - 1AR - Indiana 5Tournament: Indiana | Round: 5 | Opponent: Iowa HK | Judge: Vats Only statutory authorization solvesWilliams 11 On the eighth anniversary of the day President George W. Bush ordered U. Formal statutory mechanism’s key to legitimacyMcGuinness 9 – Margaret E. McGuinness, Associate Professor at the University of Missouri Law School, "The President, Congress and The Security Council: Counterterrorism And The Use Of Force Through The Internationalist Lens", Willamette Law Review, 45 Willamette L. Rev. 417, Spring, Lexis ~*449~ There is of course, one significant cost to congressional participation | 1/26/14 |
WPCA CP - 2AC - Indiana 5Tournament: Indiana | Round: 5 | Opponent: Iowa HK | Judge: Vats Binding Veto Key – General – 2ACCP’s weak-sauce involvement does nothing without a binding legal constraintWeissman 8 – Stephen R. Weissman, Former Staff Director, Subcommittee on Africa, House Foreign Affairs Committee, and the author of A Culture of Deference: Congress’s Failure of Leadership in Foreign Policy, "Congress at War", Foreign Affairs, May/June, http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/64297/louis-fisher-ryan-hendrickson-and-stephen-r-weissman/congress-at-war Holding hearings, imposing reporting requirements, adopting resolutions stating that Congress should authorize any Doesn’t solve morale or cohesion—-formal authorization’s keyWeingast 98 – Matthew S. Weingast, Adjunct Professor at the Joint Military Intelligence College, Associate on the National Security Team at Booz-Allen 26 Hamilton, M.S. in Strategic Intelligence from The Defense Intelligence College, Former Strategic Intelligence Officer for The Joint Chiefs of Staff, "The Strategic Necessity Perspective: A New Approach to Solving Old Constitutional War Powers Questions", USAFA Journal of Legal Studies, 8 USAFA J. Leg. Stud. 109, Lexis It is difficult for many people to completely understand the relationship between the psychological and Doesn’t solve perception or Congressional leadership and lets Congress walk-back support for warSchonberg 4 – Karl K. Schonberg, Assistant Professor of Government at St. Lawrence University, "Global Security and Legal Restraint: Reconsidering War Powers after September 11", Political Science, 119(1), p. 140 But consultation cannot supplant the congressional authority to declare war, which can be exercised Only a binding authorization requirement solves the UN advantageSchulman 3 Security Council Resolutions. Some scholars focusing on international law, such as the eminent A2: Inter-Branch ConflictPlan doesn’t cause itPastor 91 – Robert A. Pastor, Professor of Political Science at Emory University and Director of the Latin American and Caribbean Program at Emory’s Carter Center, Autumn 1991 ("Congress and U.S. Foreign Policy: Comparative Advantage or Disadvantage" – The Washington Quarterly) p. lexis Needless to say, the interbranch process does not always work, and when the relationship between the two branches breaks down, U.S. foreign policy suffers. To argue that congressional assertiveness is the cause of conflict, however, is equivalent to arguing that today’s high divorce rate is due to the new assertiveness of women. Executive power makes inter-branch conflict inevitableKoh 88 – Harold Hongju Koh, Associate Professor of Law @ Yale, June 1988 (97 Yale L.J. 1255) These outcomes bear witness to the false promise of a foreign policymaking system overdominated by A2: Moral HazardThey’ll regulateMcManus 13 – Doyle McManus, Washington Bureau Chief of the Los Angeles Times, MA and Fullbright Scholar at the University of Brussels, Four-Time Winner of the National Press Club’s Edwin Hood Award for Reporting on U.S. Foreign Policy, Winner of Georgetown University’s Weintal Prize, "In America, Not Isolationism But Skepticism", Los Angeles Times, 9-15, http://www.latimes.com/opinion/commentary/la-oe-mcmanus-column-congress-obama-and-syria-20130915,0,3944454.column Opposition in Congress to a presidential request to use force has a long history. Deters Executive overreachCole 11 – David Cole, Professor at the Georgetown University Law Center, "Where Liberty Lies: Civil Society and Individual Rights After 9/11", The Wayne Law Review, Winter, 57 Wayne L. Rev. 1203, Lexis In my view, Posner and Vermeule simultaneously underestimate the constraining force of law and | 1/26/14 |
WarCal K - 1AR - Clay 2Tournament: Clay | Round: 2 | Opponent: Cal SW | Judge: Roark And, root cause args wrong – their claim’s offense for us.Swanson ’5 consequencesIssac, ’2 Drone use will only increase regardless of the planHenning 12(Job, nonresident senior fellow at the Center for the Study of the Presidency and Congress and former director of legal affairs at the Congressionally mandated Project on National Security Reform, New York Times, "Embracing the Drone," February 20, http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/21/opinion/embracing-the-drone.html?pagewanted=all26_r=0) | 10/5/13 |
WarCal K - 2AC - Clay 2Tournament: Clay | Round: 2 | Opponent: Cal SW | Judge: Roark Plan’s essential to restrain short-term effects of militarism —- sweeping critique of war is too extreme to reach broad acceptanceBacevich 13 – Andrew, Professor of History and International Relations at Boston University and Ph.D. in American Diplomatic History from Princeton University, The New American Militarism, p. 205-210 There is, wrote H. L. Mencken, "always a well- Institutional checks effectively limit war, are compatible with broader critique and are a pre-requisite to the altGrynaviski 13 – Eric Grynaviski, Professor of Political Science at The George Washington University, "The Bloodstained Spear: Public Reason and Declarations of War", International Theory, 5(2), Cambridge Journals Conclusion The burden of the argument, thus far, has been to show that Reception-theory proves reps don’t "create reality". Audiences are smart and reach their own conclusions.Kraus ’89 Edelman assumes (like the early Frankfurt School) that viewers/audi- tors | 10/5/13 |
Warfighting DA - 1AR - Clay 4Tournament: Clay | Round: 4 | Opponent: Kentucky GV | Judge: Brown, Nick Warfighting DA – Speed – Ext – President SlowExecutive’s slow in practiceDiehl 6 – Paul F. Diehl, Henning Larson Professor of Political Science at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and Tom Ginsburg, Professor of Law and Political Science at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, "Irrational War and Constitutional Design: A Reply to Professors Nzelibe and Yoo", Michigan Journal of International Law, Summer, 27 Mich. J. Int’l L. 1239, Lexis Given the advantages of deliberation and our constitutional tradition of checks and balances, Nzelibe Warfighting DA – End AroundTrade-off’s zero-sum and accesses the DA moreBarron 8 – David J. Barron, Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and Martin S. Lederman, Visiting Professor of Law at the Georgetown University Law Center, "The Commander in Chief at the Lowest Ebb — A Constitutional History", Harvard Law Review, February, 121 Harv. L. Rev. 941, Lexis In a companion Article, we described many of the structural forces responsible for this Warfighting DA – Resolve – Ext – No LinkNo historical evidence for their argumentDiehl 6 – Paul F. Diehl, Henning Larson Professor of Political Science at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and Tom Ginsburg, Professor of Law and Political Science at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, "Irrational War and Constitutional Design: A Reply to Professors Nzelibe and Yoo", Michigan Journal of International Law, Summer, 27 Mich. J. Int’l L. 1239, Lexis Congressional support’s key to effective negotiationsPastor 91 – Robert A. Pastor, Professor of Political Science at Emory University and Director of the Latin American and Caribbean Program at Emory’s Carter Center, Autumn 1991 ("Congress and U.S. Foreign Policy: Comparative Advantage or Disadvantage" – The Washington Quarterly) p. lexis Although Congress is frequently criticized for undermining the president’s foreign policies, a president who | 10/6/13 |
Warfighting DA - 1AR - UK RR 4Tournament: UK RR | Round: 4 | Opponent: Kentucky GR | Judge: Green, Justin A2: HederWon’t be usedHeder 10 VI. Practical Limits on Congress’s Power Absent the exercise of one of the above | 10/4/13 |
Warfighting DA - 1AR - Wake 8Tournament: Wake | Round: 8 | Opponent: NU OP | Judge: Andres Gannon Empirical evidence disproves the link—-adversaries KNOW each case is different—-there’s no spilloverWaxman 13 – Matthew Waxman, Law Professor at Columbia Law School, "Restoring the Smeared Red Line", Lawfare Blog, 8-31, http://www.lawfareblog.com/2013/08/restoring-the-smeared-red-line/ First, too much emphasis has been placed on the idea that the calculus and Best academic studies disprove the link—-mono-causal "spillover" arguments dramatically oversimplify IRFarley 13 – Dr. Robert Farley, Assistant Professor at the Patterson School of Diplomacy and International Commerce at the University of Kentucky, "Adversaries Determine Credibility", The Diplomat, 9-8, http://thediplomat.com/flashpoints-blog/2013/09/18/adversaries-determine-credibility/ The basic logic of reputational commitment runs as follows: a U.S. Empirical evidence disproves their impactFettweis 4 – Christopher Fettweis, Professor at the U.S. Army War College, December, "Resolute Eagle or Paper Tiger? Credibility, Reputation and the War on Terror," http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p67147_index.html-http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p67147_index.html The few studies that have examined the empirical evidence seem to agree with Mercer. Warfighting DA – Global – Ext – No ResolveSyria and Asia trip wreck U.S. resolveHurst 10-5 – Steven R. Hurst, International Political Writer for The Associated Press and Former Baghdad Bureau Chief, "Sense Of Unease Growing Around The World As U.S. Government Looks Befuddled", Huffington Post, 2013, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/05/world-us-government_n_4047613.html Warfighting DA – Speed – Ext – President SlowExecutive’s slow in practiceDiehl 6 – Paul F. Diehl, Henning Larson Professor of Political Science at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and Tom Ginsburg, Professor of Law and Political Science at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, "Irrational War and Constitutional Design: A Reply to Professors Nzelibe and Yoo", Michigan Journal of International Law, Summer, 27 Mich. J. Int’l L. 1239, Lexis Given the advantages of deliberation and our constitutional tradition of checks and balances, Nzelibe | 12/14/13 |
Warfighting DA - 2AC - Clay 4Tournament: Clay | Round: 4 | Opponent: Kentucky GV | Judge: Brown, Nick Resolve is impossible without Congressional backing – Howell is affHowell et al 5 Dispelling Myths of Political Resolve: A large body of work on crisis bargaining ¶ End around — lack of prior participation causes interference in duration and conduct of warBarron 8 – David J. Barron, Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and Martin S. Lederman, Visiting Professor of Law at the Georgetown University Law Center, "The Commander in Chief at the Lowest Ebb — A Constitutional History", Harvard Law Review, February, 121 Harv. L. Rev. 941, Lexis By the conclusion of the Clinton Administration, however, it appeared that something of Negotiating power —- Congressional support boosts resolve by showing unified support for war —- that’s Webb and Gelb —- solves the DADueck 10 – Colin Dueck, Associate Professor of Public and International Affairs at George Mason University, "Regaining a Realistic Foreign Policy", Policy Review, No. 162, 8-1, http://www.hoover.org/publications/policy-review/article/43426 Fifth, think of diplomacy as simply one tool in America’s foreign policy toolkit, Leaks inevitable —- authorization has no impactLobel 12 – Jules Lobel, Professor of Law at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law, "The Constitutionality of Covert War: Rebuttals", Journal of National Security Law 26 Policy, 5 J. Nat’l Security L. 26 Pol’y 429, Lexis Finally, Professor Turner argues that in some cases of covert warfare, such as Plan leaves flexibility to respond to terrorismFleischman 10 – Matthew Fleischman, J.D. Candidate at New York University School of Law, "A Functional Distribution of War Powers", New York University Journal of Legislation and Public Policy, 13 N.Y.U. J. Legis. 26 Pub. Pol’y 137, Lexis C. Responding to Terrorism - War Powers in the Twenty-First Century The | 10/6/13 |
Warfighting DA - 2AC - Clay 6Tournament: Clay | Round: 6 | Opponent: Wake MS | Judge: Barouch Authorization’s key to durable support by locking in public and Congressional backing —- ensures funding and human capital necessary to win wars —- also key to morale and cohesion —- that’s Gelb and Frye. Turns Congressional interference linksWaxman 13 – Matthew Waxman, Law Professor at Columbia Law School, "The Most Puzzling Line of the President’s Speech", Lawfare Blog, 9-11, http://www.lawfareblog.com/2013/09/the-most-puzzling-line-of-the-presidents-speech/ I recently posted my new paper on The Constitutional Power to Threaten War (forthcoming Extra-constitutional action solves extreme short-term threats —- President can violate and get approval later —- that’s Lobel. Solves the DA but avoids spilloverPosner 10 – Eric A. Posner, Professor at the University of Chicago School of Law, "Executive Decision", The New Republic, 3-29, http://www.newrepublic.com/book/review/executive-decision Imagine that U.S. agents nab a terrorist who knows the location of ====Authorization makes threats credible==== Other scholars have recently pointed to the special role of legislative bodies in signaling with | 10/6/13 |
Warfighting DA - 2AC - UK RR 4Tournament: UK RR | Round: 4 | Opponent: Kentucky GR | Judge: Green, Justin Authorization’s key to durable support by locking in public and Congressional backing —- ensures funding and human capital necessary to win wars —- also key to morale and cohesion —- that’s Gelb and Frye. Turns Congressional interference linksWaxman 13 – Matthew Waxman, Law Professor at Columbia Law School, "The Most Puzzling Line of the President’s Speech", Lawfare Blog, 9-11, http://www.lawfareblog.com/2013/09/the-most-puzzling-line-of-the-presidents-speech/ I recently posted my new paper on The Constitutional Power to Threaten War (forthcoming Flexibility link’s a lieStreichler 8 – Stuart Streichler, Adjunct Faculty at Seattle University School of Law. Ph.D. at Johns Hopkins University; J.D. at the University of Michigan Law School; B.S. at Bowling Green State University, "Mad about Yoo, or Why Worry about the Next Unconstitutional War", The Journal of Law 26 Politics, Winter, 24 J. L. 26 Politics 93, Lexis When Yoo discusses the need for flexibility in the process for warmaking, he creates Extra-constitutional action solves extreme short-term threats —- President can violate and get approval later —- that’s Lobel. Solves the DA but avoids spilloverPosner 10 – Eric A. Posner, Professor at the University of Chicago School of Law, "Executive Decision", The New Republic, 3-29, http://www.newrepublic.com/book/review/executive-decision Imagine that U.S. agents nab a terrorist who knows the location of ====Authorization makes threats credible==== Other scholars have recently pointed to the special role of legislative bodies in signaling with | 10/4/13 |
Warfighting DA - 2AC - Wake 1Tournament: Wake | Round: 1 | Opponent: Wichita State MR | Judge: White, Janna Authorization’s key to durable support by locking in public and Congressional backing —- ensures funding and human capital necessary to win wars —- also key to morale and cohesion —- that’s Gelb and Frye. Turns Congressional interference linksWaxman 13 – Matthew Waxman, Law Professor at Columbia Law School, "The Most Puzzling Line of the President’s Speech", Lawfare Blog, 9-11, http://www.lawfareblog.com/2013/09/the-most-puzzling-line-of-the-presidents-speech/ I recently posted my new paper on The Constitutional Power to Threaten War (forthcoming Flexibility link’s a lieStreichler 8 – Stuart Streichler, Adjunct Faculty at Seattle University School of Law. Ph.D. at Johns Hopkins University; J.D. at the University of Michigan Law School; B.S. at Bowling Green State University, "Mad about Yoo, or Why Worry about the Next Unconstitutional War", The Journal of Law 26 Politics, Winter, 24 J. L. 26 Politics 93, Lexis When Yoo discusses the need for flexibility in the process for warmaking, he creates YooTroll==== The OPR ultimately issued its Final Report finding that the Bybee and Yoo memos " | 11/16/13 |
Warfighting DA - 2AC - Wake 8Tournament: Wake | Round: 8 | Opponent: NU OP | Judge: Andres Gannon No cross-country spillover—-each case is different and context mattersWaxman 13 – Matthew Waxman, Law Professor at Columbia Law School, "The Most Puzzling Line of the President’s Speech", Lawfare Blog, 9-11, http://www.lawfareblog.com/2013/09/the-most-puzzling-line-of-the-presidents-speech/ My third question is about effectiveness. I agree that as a general matter " Resolve’s shot—-especially in the Middle EastBurns 11-7 – Nicholas Burns, Professor of the Practice of Diplomacy and International Politics at Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government, "Mideast Allies Crave Leadership from US", Boston Globe, 2013, http://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2013/11/07/the-leadership-deficit-mideast/ASbdXT1Iub5tuyeJQc7ljO/story.html SEEMINGLY EVERYWHERE he turns these days, President Obama is facing criticism of his foreign Plan’s spun as freeing up military resources for other areas—-doesn’t hamper resolveFarley 13 – Dr. Robert Farley, Assistant Professor at the Patterson School of Diplomacy and International Commerce at the University of Kentucky, "Don’t Mistake US Hesitancy Over Syria For Weakness", Global Times, 10-21, http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/819271.shtml~~23.UmlVbHCKKSo But since at least the Cold War, questions of resolve, reputation, and 4G wrong – interstate conflict likelyKhan, 10 (Amos – MSc. in Strategic Studies from the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies – Nanyang Technological University and Research Analyst with the US Research Programme at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies – Nanyang Technological University, 10/14, "A Response to Fourth Generation Warfare", S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Working Papers, http://www.rsis.edu.sg/publications/WorkingPapers/WP211.pdf) Conclusion Hammes and van Creveld ignore important continuities in military thought and their theories suffer | 12/14/13 |
Wilderson K - 1AR - USC DubsTournament: USC | Round: Doubles | Opponent: OU BC | Judge: Sarah Lundeen, Crowe, Severson Political Ontology Turnthat specifically turns Wilderson’s arg – which assumes non-State coalitions of unity are the way to solve.Meyer ’3 StateComparison to "plantations" is violent – obscure ongoing oppression. Better to use alternate terms.Reid ’11 Informed consent standard WERE CREATED BY CIVIL SOCIETY AND GOVERNMENT. Our opponent’s use of informed consent proves those entities are NOT categorically violent TO THEM or THIS DEBATE SPACE.Perrault ’7 There is a large and growing body of international and regional guidelines on implementing prior informed consent. Example wrong – Felony disenfranchisement way-down – and it’s due to the kind of reformism we defend.Porter ’10 Here’s more ev that State-reformism can work:Omi’13 In Feagin and Elias’s account, white racist rule in the USA appears unalterable and MARKED s of the 1960s have proved irreversible; they have set powerful democratic forces in ShunningClaiming "State’s always racist" is a turn. Over-privileges hopelessness – makes actual remedies impossibleFarber ’98 | 1/4/14 |
Wilderson K - 2NC - USC DubsTournament: USC | Round: Doubles | Opponent: OU BC | Judge: Sarah Lundeen, Crowe, Severson FrameworkExtend our 1AC Stuhr ev. K’s of Aff’s macro-political starting point don’t apply in the War Powers context. Neg’s anti-State and micro-1st stance fail. Stuhr’s next paragraph prove that WE DON’T EXCLUDE their framework – but perm’s the best option.Stuhr ’8 These and related experiences, rooted in a love of war, are not merely Heuristic Solves Racism( ) Our Heuristic breaks-down racist power structures. If they win the State or Debate’s racist – we still best teach how to re-assign that power.INOUE ’5 Gutherie’s definition of nomos helps us also see the nomos-physis debate as one 2AC – FOUR LAYER FiatTwo – We’re vertical constraint through the public sphere.Lobel ’89 These changes would supplement and ultimately transform traditional separation of power restraints. The constitutional Three – Awareness. We may spur macro-change. If we don’t, our Aff still boosts awareness. This beats framework distinctions by helping the debate-space adjust to Executive practice:Young – quoting Stewart – ’13 About six months ago, my assistant debate coaches and I decided that it would be a good idea to craft a justification paper to persuade the NDT-CEDA college policy debate community State not Always Racist – WallToo sweeping to say working-through-State never counters racism – here’s 7 concrete examples:Seligman ’11 Litigation as a tool for social change has a long and proud tradition in the And, meaningful reformism now – disproves sweeping claim.Farber ’98 Framing Point ~23 2 – How we engage:*Pessimism towards progressivism inverts the error and makes racism worse. This card rules:Jones ’99 An even more troubling feature of Adorno and Horkheimer’s analysis is the downplaying of individual Master’s ToolsThe master’s tools can be used to dismantle the master’s house Turns to Political Ontology – Black unityWe K the whole notion of "political ontology" as it relates to race. It discourages black unity – it’s net worse.James ’10 A-to Social Death( ) Social Death args re-inscribe dominant forms of exceptionalism. This increases the very violence they seek to avoid.Peterson ’7 Wilderson Frontline( ) Wilderson’s too pessimistic – this reifies his own K and locks-in the worst oppression.Marriott ’12 Whatever one might think of the cogency of these remarks (if only because the Sexton’s KFlawed, Methodologically wrong=== ( ) Sexton’s entire K is de-contextual and based on poor evidenceSpickard ’9 Isaac – Util/Ethics( ) No, not ethics disad – consequencesIssac, ’2 A-to RodriguezTheir Rodriguez article is NOT about abolition of the USFG – it’s about prison abolition. It DOES NOT contextualize.Here’s proof:Rodriguez ’10 Speaking more precisely to the concerns raised by this issue of Radical Teacher, the Rodriguez clarifies that this definition of "abolition" is taken from the organization "Critical Resistance"Rodriguez ’10 The "prison industrial complex," in contrast to the prison regime, names the This clarifies Critical Resistance’s mission:Critical Resistance.Org Critical Resistance seeks to build an international movement to end the prison industrial complex ( Sequencing – 2AC( ) Sequencing claim’s wrong. Through "lulling", the Micro rarely gets-around to the Macro and empowers violent institutions while we wait.Gitlin ’97 2AC – Add-on RacismUnless POTUS authority declines via the Aff, racist interventions will increase.Grynaviski ’13 Second, this conception rightly focuses us outward, rather than inward. The current | 1/4/14 |
Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
---|---|---|---|
3/28/14 | anastasiakazteridis@gmailcom | ||
3/28/14 | anastasiakazteridis@gmailcom |
Air Force
Amherst
Appalachian State
Arizona State
Army
Augustana
Bard
Baylor
Binghamton
Boston College
Capital
CSU Long Beach
CSU Northridge
CSU Sacramento
CUNY
Cal Berkeley
Cal Lutheran
Cal Poly SLO
Case Western
Central Florida
Central Oklahoma
Chico
Clarion
Columbia
Concordia
Cornell
Dartmouth
Denver
Drexel-Swarthmore
ENMU
East Los Angeles College
Eastern Washington
Emory
Emporia
Fayetteville State
Florida
Florida Int'l
Florida State
Fordham
Fresno State
Fullerton
Gainesville State
George Mason
George Washington
Georgetown
Georgia
Georgia State
Georgia Tech
Gonzaga
Harvard
Houston
Idaho State
Illinois
Illinois State
Indiana
Iowa
Irvine/SFSU
James Madison
John Carroll
Johns Hopkins
Johnson County CC
KCKCC
Kansas
Kansas State
Kentucky
LA City College
Lakeland
Lewis-Clark State College
Liberty
Lindenwood
Los Rios
Louisville
Loyola
Macalester
Marist
Mary Washington
Mercer
Methodist
Miami FL
Miami OH
Michigan
Michigan State
Minnesota
Mission
Missouri State
NYU
Navy
New School
North Texas
Northern Iowa
Northwestern
Notre Dame
Ohio Wesleyan
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pepperdine
Piedmont
Pittsburgh
Portland State
Princeton
Puget Sound
Redlands
Richmond
Rochester
Rutgers
Samford
San Diego State
San Francisco State
Santa Clara
South Florida St Pete
Southern Methodist
Southwestern
Stanford
Texas State
Texas-Austin
Texas-Dallas
Texas-San Antonio
Texas-Tyler
Towson
Trinity
U Chicago
UCLA
UDC-CC
UMKC
UNLV
USC
Utah
Vanderbilt
Vermont
Virginia Tech
Wake Forest
Wash U (St. Louis)
Washburn
Washington
Wayne State
Weber
West Georgia
West Virginia
Western Connecticut
Whitman
Wichita State
Wisconsin Oshkosh
Wyoming