Tournament: Kansas State University The Soul Of America | Round: 1 | Opponent: KCKCC Torres  Smith | Judge: Bonnet, Alexander
The Courts have a case and controversy requirement – the plan text has a controversy but no case – it would be impossible to just rule something unconstitutional without a test case. No lit base or roots in reality.
Benjamin 99
(Stuart, prof at University of San Diego Law School, “Stepping Into the Same River Twice: Rapidly Changing Facts and the Appellate Process,” 78 Texas L. Rev. 269, L/N)
  Congress could attempt to ….. force but no factual basis.

Tournament: Kansas State University The Soul Of America | Round: 1 | Opponent: KCKCC Torres  Smith | Judge: Bonnet, Alexander
The Affirmative clings to legally permissible acts of killing—this will always ensure that our aggression just gets dressed up in the respectable garb of legality

Jochnick and Normand, 1994 (Chris and Roger, JD’s at Harvard Law, “the legitimation of violence: a critical history of the laws of war” 35 Harv. Int'l L.J. 49 JK)
While the laws of war impose no substantive ……n which law is internalized as belief and belief leads to compliance.¶

Legalistically certain calls for war are epistemologically bankrupt and ignore the structural root cause of large scale violence. Our alternative is to reject the 1ac and in favor of pacifist deliberation. Doubting the aff and its violent calculations is key to re-orient politics and philosophy towards careful decision-making

Neu 2013
(“The tragedy of justified war”¶ Michael Neu,¶ University of Brighton, International Relations 2013, http://ire.sagepub.com/content/27/4/461)kk
Just war theory is not ……. fighting or not fighting them¶ will be.

Tournament: Any | Round: 1 | Opponent: Any | Judge: Any
Targeted killing is a state crafted euphemism used to distances ourselves from the ethics of our actions, the affs use of the term is key in legitimizing the practices they attempt to stop.
Craig Jones March 12, 2013
(Phd at Culumbia and member of the Lui Institute for global affairs) Legitimate target? http://warlawspace.com/tag/targeted-killing/

Targeted killing is …. Israeli legal and religious elite.

This regime of sanitized language actively conceals the horror of totalitarianism---the language of euphemism clinically detaches people from any sense of ethical responsibility
Elias Davidsson, Centre for Research on Globalization, 2003 (http://www.aldeilis.net/jus/econsanc/debate.pdf)

In order to effectively ….humanitarian law has sprung.

Euphemisms are central to the capacity to wage an unregulated war on terror---the plan legitimizes the abuse of civil liberties and the mistreatment of prisoners   
Andrew Sullivan, political journalist for New York Times Magazine, 11/12/05 (http://www.andrewsullivan.com/index.php?dish_inc=archives/2005_11_06_dish_archive.html)

EXEMPTING THE CIA: ….. of defenseless detainees.

Tournament: Kansas State University The Soul Of America | Round: 1 | Opponent: KCKCC Torres  Smith | Judge: Bonnet, Alexander
Using the word “detain” is political euphemism that is unethical and turns solvency—“imprisonment” is more accurate—hold the 1ac accountable
Sullivan, 4/12 editor of The New York Times (Margaret Sullivan, 12 April 2013, “‘Targeted Killing,’ ‘Detainee’ and ‘Torture’: Why Language Choice Matters,” http://publiceditor.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/04/12/targeted-killing-detainee-and-torture-why-language-choice-matters/?_r=0)//CC

If it’s torture, why call ……, at times, some institutional soul-searching.

The use of the word detainees cleanses the ideology of indefinite detention, it is a representation formulated by the United States federal government to loophole through the standards of the Geneva Convention, and ignores the actuality of the prisoners.
Ahmad ’9
(Muneer L., Clinical professor of law at Yale Law School, Northwestern University School of Law, "Resisting Guantanamo: Rights at the Brink of Dehumanization", Vol. 103, No. 4,http://www.law.northwestern.edu/lawreview/v103/n4/1683/LR103n4Ahmad.pdf-http://www.law.northwestern.edu/lawreview/v103/n4/1683/LR103n4Ahmad.pdf, AO) 

Throughout this ….. by describing them as prisoners.

Tournament: Any | Round: 1 | Opponent: Any | Judge: Any
Restriction” is a method of prohibiting that “authority,” not adding checks within it
P.A. Mohammed 1/24/97
(J. Sri Chithira Aero And Adventure ... vs The Director General Of Civil ... on 24 January, 1997¶ Equivalent citations: AIR 1997 Ker 121 Sri Chithira Aero And Adventure ... vs The Director General Of Civil ...; http://www.indiankanoon.org/doc/255504/?type=print)

10. Microlight aircrafts or hang …. use and operation of aircrafts.

Vote neg for precise limits and eductaion – only prohibition can restrict “authority” because it only exists after right to act is delegated
Garfagnini 10/15/12
(Umberto, ITAM School of Business, “The Dynamics of Authority in Innovating Organizations,” https://editorialexpress.com/cgi-bin/conference/download.cgi?db_name=MWETFall2012andpaper_id=62)

Why do organizations …. and then later centralize authority.

Tournament: ANY | Round: 1 | Opponent: ANY | Judge: ANY
Society is controlled by white supremacist capital patriarchy – it strengthens itself by functioning under the surface and exploiting difference. Discussing differences is the only way to create an insulation against it
hooks 92. (bell, 1992, “Eating the other,” from “Black Looks: Race and Representation,” pages 21-22, www.scribd.com/doc/118302450/Eating-the-Other-bell-Hooks

This is theory’s acute ….. revolutionary longings are ever fulfilled.

The alternative is to perform a social structural analysis in order to re conceptualize social relations. The roll of the ballot is to access who best performs a methodology that alleviates social oppression

A relational structural analysis is key to understanding the way society functions
Anderson and Collins 10. “Why race, c1lass, and gender still matter”,  Race, Class, and Gender: an Anthology, pp. 12-13

We want readers to …..framework of society.