Tournament: Uco | Round: 2 | Opponent: UT Dallas Becker-Powell | Judge: Wonnacott
*KATIE READS A PERSONAL TESTIMONY*
Imperialist structures have waged war on the under-privileged. The structural weapons they have used are designed to target individuals who they want to remain at the bottom of the social rungs of society. This targeted killing is no accident, this targeted killing is not easy, it is silenced by the power structures. Those structures use everything they have at their disposal to create circumstances that not only hurt oppressed individuals but also ensure their power remains intact.
The oppressive structures wage a war on the disadvantaged that Mumia Abu Jamal describes as worse than the most severe nuclear war or genocide.
(1998 “A Quiet and Deadly Violence”, 9/19/98, httpwww.mumia.nl/TCCDMAJ/quietdv.htm)
It has often been observed that America is a truly violent nation
AND
weak and poor every year of every decade, throughout the world." Gilligan, p. 196
Most debaters will speak towards the way in which presidential war powers are exercised without even considering the oppressed, and many debaters will speak about their oppression abstractly, or advance debate practices that only disarm the just causes of the oppressed. Currently debaters are assumed to take on the role of a neutral subject where issues of life and death do not matter, and the words we speak and the ideas we advance don't matter so long as “they are strategic.” This discourages participation in this activity and renders all ethical considerations void and allows for disinterested debate that either replicates flawed policy-making or allows us to condone violent rhetoric and conversations.
Spanos explains (2004. William V., available online cross-x.com url: http://www.cross-x.com/vb/showthread.php?t=945110andhighlight=Spanos+Email Nov. 18)
Dear Joe MIller, Yes, the statement about the American debate
AND
which the blind arrogance of Bush Administration and his neocon policy makers is leading.
The Role of the Ballot in this debate is whoever best performatively and methodologically reorients power within the intersections.
As debaters speaking towards presidential war powers, we must first investigate the ways in which the institution deciding those powers is founded and surrounded by oppression, and investigate the oppression it creates on the other side of the world. However, this oppression cannot be explained by politicians or by military reports; Henze explains that we must heed the perspective of the oppressed as to gain the best and closest understanding of the oppression we may only witness secondhand.
Brent R. Henze, 2000“Who Says Who Says?: The Epistemological Grounds for Agency in Liberatory Political Projects.” Found in Reclaiming Identity: Realist theory and the predicament of postmodernism. Edited by Paula Moya and Michael Hames-Garcia
CONCLUSION: WHAT ROLE CAN OTHERS PLAY IN THE POLITICS OF THE OPPRESSED?
The question has necessarily shaped my approach to the work I have presented above:
AND
In other words, the standpoint of the oppressed is necessary to manage our own involvement with systems of oppression so as most effectively to combat oppression