General Actions:
Wiki: opencaselist13
▼:
Document Index
»
Space: John Carroll
▼:
Document Index
»
Page: Stolfer-Massarelli Neg
Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Video | Edit/Delete |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMU | 1 | Clarion BC | Paul Mabrey |
|
Tournament | Round | Report |
---|
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Entry | Date |
---|---|
All NegTournament: JMU | Round: 1 | Opponent: Clarion BC | Judge: Paul Mabrey 1NCFWA. Interpretation: the aff can only defend advantages based on the consequences of hypothetical enactment of their plan by the USFG. They should win if the topical plan is the best policy option presented. The neg should win if the plan is worse than the status quo or an alternative competitive with the plan. Our definition excludes action by smaller political groups or individuals. B- Violation – the aff claims advantages independent of the enactment of a plan by the USFG C- REASONS TO PREFER 1ST-Plan focus – The plan is the starting-point for debate. If they claim advantages in the 1AC which do not stem from the plan, there is no way for us to predict what the content of those advantages will be. Consequently, there is no way for us to generate stable and predictable offense. Without plan focus, they would always leverage an artificial ground advantage—even if there are impact turns to the critiques, we should not have to be prepared to run them against their aff; and, in any case, they will always be better prepared to debate their own unpredictable drivel than we will. The point may seem trite, as surely the ambiguists would agree that basic terms THIS IS A VOTING ISSUE FOR COMPETITIVE EQUITY. Framework is a prerequisite to debate. The requirements given thus far are primarily negative. The ambiguists must say "no DEBATE IS A SITE OF CONTESTATION WITH THE BACKDROP OF COMPETITION. THIS IS A SHARED ACTIVITY WITH SELF-DEVELOPMENT BEING THE HIGHEST PRIORITY. IN ORDER TO DEVELOP IN THE BEST WAY POSSIBLE WE MUST HAVE EQUAL GROUND DISTRIBUTION ON BOTH SIDES. ANNULLING ONE SIDES GROUND DEVOIDS ANY POSSIBILITY OF DEVELOPMENT DEBATE IS SUPPOSED TO BE HARD. THIS REQUIRES RESISTANCE ON BOTH SIDES TO SPUR FORCE AND ADEQUATE DEVELOPMENT. THE HARDER WE MAKE DEBATE THE BETTER WE WILL BECOME. While reactive forces respond to their context and in this way are dictated by them DEFENDING WHAT YOU DON’T BELIEVE IN VIA ROLEPLAYING IS A CRITICAL SITE OF EDUCATION. LEARNING TO LIE IS CRITICAL TO SELF AFFIRMATION AS WELL AS LEARNING TRUTH. THEIR DISAVOWAL OF THIS TYPE OF EDUCATION LEADS TO BAD EDUCATION. 1NC TEXT : The United States federal government should substantially increase statutory and/or judicial restrictions on the commander-in-chief powers of the President of the United States in one or more of the following areas: targeted killing; indefinite detention; offensive cyber operations; or introducing United States Armed Forces into hostilities,” THE COUNTERPLAN COMPETES THROUGH ITS USE OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AND THE NET BENEFITS. Kolhatkar knows the answer as well as Zizek does. "How "effective" STRATEGY OF THE MASSES SOLVES-IT’S IMPOSSIBLE TO ACT AS AN ETHICAL SUBJECT WHEN THE SUPERSTRUCTURES OF POWER HAVE ALWAYS ALREADY CO-OPTED YOUR MOVEMENT. OUR ACT OF POLITICAL SIMULATION BOTH FITS WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK WE’VE SET OUT, AND PROVIDES THE ONLY VIABLE OPTION FOR CHALLENGING WESTERN DOMINANCE-STRATEGY OF THE MASSES SOLVES. Baudrillard 1983 (Jean, French Continental Philosopher) In the Shadow of the Silent Majorities or The End of the Social and Other Essays. Pages 30-48 The mass realizes that the paradox of being both an object of simulation (it NET BENEFITS Conjunction of the system and of its extreme alternative like the two sides of a Baudrillard ’05 (The Intelligence of Evil) Freedom? A dream! Everyone aspires to it, or at least gives the TYRANNY OF THE SELF- RATHER THAN RISK INSERTING ONESSELF INTO THE LIBERATORY STRUCTURE ONLY TO BE OPPRESSED BY ONES OWN FAILURE, WE MUST ACCEPT THE STRATEGY OF THE MASSES. THE TYRANNY OF THE SELF THEIR PROJECT ESTABLISHES IS QUALITATIVELY WORSE THAN BEING OPPRESSED BY THE POWERS THAT BE. Baudrillard 1993 (Jean, The transparency of evil : essays on extreme phenomena / Jean Baudrillard ; translated by James Benedict. London : New York : Verso, 1993. P. 167-168) At all events, it is better to be controlled by someone else than by oneself. Better to be oppressed, exploited, persecuted and manipulated by someone other than oneself. K Aff Shell Moral judgments are flawed. Reject the affirmative assumptions while embracing the inaction of wuwei. Only this solves the problems of humanity. Why It Is Wrong to Resent Unexpected Changes In Chuang-tzu 18, we Wuwei will carry us through life. The Teachings of the Daode jing The focus of the Daode jing is something called Poverty Shell Debt Ceiling will pass In statements afterward that struck the most positive tone in weeks of acrimony, House Plan kills Obama’s agenda One of the mechanisms by which congressional opposition influences presidential cost-benefit calculations is Losing authority would embolden the GOP on the debt ceiling fight Unless President Obama can totally change a reluctant public's perception of another Middle-Eastern Not passing Debt Ceiling would kill global economy FAILURE to raise the US debt ceiling will do "serious damage" to both 2NC Framework- K Aff 1) Only spiritual change can solve true discrimination. Discrimination When people see some things as beautiful, other things become ugly. When AT: You Link to the K 1.Voting neg doesn’t require passing judgment only action is attached to achieving desired ends. Inaction is the natural result of emptying yourself of thought and living in the present moment. You are voting neg to avoid action not against the aff. Simply choose not to endorse their call to action. Presumption theory and the Tao agree. But doesn't the Tao te ching enjoin the reader to somehow do something to correct AT: PERM How does moving onto Taoist ground, and immersing ourselves in Taoist experience, play AT: Extinction/Death Bad
But by this definition, the natural order, which we are enjoined to respect AT PERM DO BOTH
But doesn't the Tao te ching enjoin the reader to somehow do something to correct 2. The permutation either fails or severs out of ‘should’- Severence is a voting issue- creates time skew and destroys the negatives ability to have any sort of K or CP, reason to reject the team. AT: Action Good 1) We must accept what both the joy and the suffering we are given. Empty your mind of all thoughts. Let your heart be at peace. Watch 2) This is true of suffering --- taking action for desired end spurs more suffering and prohibits understanding of the Tao. Action Practice not-doing, and everything will fall into place. (Chapter 1NR Society is defined by its outsiders – it’s impossible to have an identity without an other. Their attempt to bring the excluded into the center of society destroys the other and makes all of society the outsider, collapsing the entire social realm. Thus the remainder refers to much more than a clear division in two localized terms Speaking out and raising awareness is playing into the hands of the system they criticize, because it is intended to maximize speech without creating change. Instead, we need to engage the system through passive resistance, not active opposition. The idea of the state vanishing through revolution and people refusing to accept it is just a pipe-dream – it doesn’t fit the modern era. Rather, the state will implode through overrregulation, like a system with too much feedback – the plan’s action is a step in this direction. Beaubourg cannot even burn, everything is foreseen. Fire, explosion, destruction are A/T PERM In any case, the two orders of thought are irreconcilable. They each follow Any critical argument that is combined with reality is immediately robbed of its critical potential – the events are infinitely adaptable, and cynically morph to support any theory that might challenge them, which destroys the effectiveness of the theory. To be effective, the criticism must remain on the margin. More subtly, reality also gets its revenge from those who challenge it by, | 10/11/13 |
Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
---|
Air Force
Amherst
Appalachian State
Arizona State
Army
Augustana
Bard
Baylor
Binghamton
Boston College
Capital
CSU Long Beach
CSU Northridge
CSU Sacramento
CUNY
Cal Berkeley
Cal Lutheran
Cal Poly SLO
Case Western
Central Florida
Central Oklahoma
Chico
Clarion
Columbia
Concordia
Cornell
Dartmouth
Denver
Drexel-Swarthmore
ENMU
East Los Angeles College
Eastern Washington
Emory
Emporia
Fayetteville State
Florida
Florida Int'l
Florida State
Fordham
Fresno State
Fullerton
Gainesville State
George Mason
George Washington
Georgetown
Georgia
Georgia State
Georgia Tech
Gonzaga
Harvard
Houston
Idaho State
Illinois
Illinois State
Indiana
Iowa
Irvine/SFSU
James Madison
John Carroll
Johns Hopkins
Johnson County CC
KCKCC
Kansas
Kansas State
Kentucky
LA City College
Lakeland
Lewis-Clark State College
Liberty
Lindenwood
Los Rios
Louisville
Loyola
Macalester
Marist
Mary Washington
Mercer
Methodist
Miami FL
Miami OH
Michigan
Michigan State
Minnesota
Mission
Missouri State
NYU
Navy
New School
North Texas
Northern Iowa
Northwestern
Notre Dame
Ohio Wesleyan
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pepperdine
Piedmont
Pittsburgh
Portland State
Princeton
Puget Sound
Redlands
Richmond
Rochester
Rutgers
Samford
San Diego State
San Francisco State
Santa Clara
South Florida St Pete
Southern Methodist
Southwestern
Stanford
Texas State
Texas-Austin
Texas-Dallas
Texas-San Antonio
Texas-Tyler
Towson
Trinity
U Chicago
UCLA
UDC-CC
UMKC
UNLV
USC
Utah
Vanderbilt
Vermont
Virginia Tech
Wake Forest
Wash U (St. Louis)
Washburn
Washington
Wayne State
Weber
West Georgia
West Virginia
Western Connecticut
Whitman
Wichita State
Wisconsin Oshkosh
Wyoming