Tournament: Fullerton | Round: 3 | Opponent: California, Berkeley Greenbury-Wang | Judge: Eisenstadt
Legal discourse relies on a universal male norm, which measures women as deviant and excludes their experiences and understandings of reality.
Carrington 02
(Kerry, Sociology professor at the University of New England, Law/Text/Culture, 6 LTC 107, 128-129, 2002)
Feminist research poses a profound challenge to the hegemony of law's claims to produce incontestable
AND
dominant) White, middle-class male' (Graycar 1995: 267).
Gender constructions are reproduced as much by what is NOT said as it is by what is said – the critique highlights the sometimes strategic sometimes unintended consequences of these choices – they should be held responsible for both
Whitworth 94
Whitworth, Assistant professor of Political Science at York University, 1994 Sandra, Associate Professor Department of Political Science and Women’s Studies, Feminism and International Relations, p. 75
In looking for gender in policy statements, or the histories surrounding the creation of
AND
results, can be seen to reproduce unequal relationships between women and men.
Patriarchy is the root cause of war.
Reardon 85
(Betty, coordinator of the Peace Education Program at Colombia University, Sexism and the War System, p 7, 1985)
The profoundly sexist history of the human species indicates that the socially induced and prescribed
AND
the practice of war. Society reinforces and exacerbates this perception of otherness.
Addressing gender inequality within law is essential to human survival.
Scales 93
(Ann C, Professor of Law at University of New Mexico, “Feminist Jurisprudence” pg 98, 1993)
The problem of inequality of the sexes stands in complex relation to the problem of
AND
thinking like a lawyer;” the latter, “thinking like a person.
The alternative is to reject the affirmative:
Voting neg affirms and allows the female voice discussions within debate. This method can enrich legal education, both in rounds and in a larger forum.
Worden 85
(K.C., J.D. expected, 1986, Washington College of Law, The American University, “A SYMPOSIUM OF CRITICAL LEGAL STUDY: OVERSHOOTING THE TARGET: A FEMINIST DECONSTRUCTION OF LEGAL EDUCATION.” 1985 The American University Law Review¶ American University Law Review)
The kinds of changes I envision in legal education are not impossible or hopelessly utopian
AND
than detractions from, the legal legitimacy and educational effectiveness of their presentation.
Wouldn't it be nice if similar attempts to enrich the educational process were made in
AND
is possible in other classes too. Someone need only make that choice.
Female voice in legal education solves, by injecting a new form of pedagogy in legal discussions, “otherness” is experienced by those accustomed to the traditional “male voice” strategy, enlightening experience aye.
Worden 85
(K.C., J.D. expected, 1986, Washington College of Law, The American University, “A SYMPOSIUM OF CRITICAL LEGAL STUDY: OVERSHOOTING THE TARGET: A FEMINIST DECONSTRUCTION OF LEGAL EDUCATION.” 1985 The American University Law Review¶ American University Law Review)
Looking back on the feminism classes of my Modern Legal Theory course, which we
AND
is socially created, and can be dispelled by subjective choice and effort.
The alternative is integral to legal analysis – it is key to revealing gender implications in laws and stopping women’s subordination.
Bartlett 90
(Bartlett, Professor of law at Duke University, 1990.
(Katherine T., Feminist Legal Methods, Harvard Law Review 103, Lexis.
Once adopted as a method, asking the woman question is a method of critique
AND
potential relevance and that "tight" legal analysis never assumes gender neutrality.