General Actions:
Wiki: opencaselist13
▼:
Document Index
»
Space: Georgia Tech
▼:
Document Index
»
Page: Johnson-Saenz Neg
Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Video | Edit/Delete |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSU | 2 | Georgetown ErMc | Lowry, Sean |
| ||||
GSU | 4 | Georgetown EnMc | Whitmore, Whit |
| ||||
GSU | 5 | Northwestern MP | Topp, Sarah |
| ||||
GSU | 8 | Houston AlAs | Elliot, Scott |
| ||||
Kentucky | 1 | Georgia DaGa | Ridley, Sean |
| ||||
Vanderbilt | 2 | Wake Forest MS | Robisch, Kyle |
| ||||
Vanderbilt | 3 | UGAEmory SS | Delong, Brian |
| ||||
Vanderbilt | 6 | GSU FN | Lee, Ed |
| ||||
Wake Forest | 3 | Rochester MW | Sciullo, Nick |
| ||||
Wake Forest | 5 | Georgia DG | Slattery, Sean |
| ||||
Wake Forest | 1 | Northwestern OP | Stone, Chris |
|
Tournament | Round | Report |
---|---|---|
GSU | 2 | Opponent: Georgetown ErMc | Judge: Lowry, Sean 1AC Drones |
GSU | 4 | Opponent: Georgetown EnMc | Judge: Whitmore, Whit 1NC Bogost K |
GSU | 5 | Opponent: Northwestern MP | Judge: Topp, Sarah 1NC Bogost K Heg Bad |
GSU | 8 | Opponent: Houston AlAs | Judge: Elliot, Scott Aff NFU |
Kentucky | 1 | Opponent: Georgia DaGa | Judge: Ridley, Sean 1NC Thermodynamics K T - Authority Warfighting DA Case Defense |
Vanderbilt | 2 | Opponent: Wake Forest MS | Judge: Robisch, Kyle 1NC (From Georgetown EM Round 5 Kentucky) Warfighting DA CIL DA XO CP Ilaw-Bad on Case |
Vanderbilt | 3 | Opponent: UGAEmory SS | Judge: Delong, Brian 1NC X-O CP Warfighting DA CIL Politics DA Militarism K (Pretty much all from Cal's evidence) |
Vanderbilt | 6 | Opponent: GSU FN | Judge: Lee, Ed 1NC T Warfighting DA States SP DA XO CP |
Wake Forest | 3 | Opponent: Rochester MW | Judge: Sciullo, Nick 1AC OrientalismIndef Detention |
Wake Forest | 5 | Opponent: Georgia DG | Judge: Slattery, Sean 1AC NEPA Judicial Review |
Wake Forest | 1 | Opponent: Northwestern OP | Judge: Stone, Chris 1AC Ex-parte review (Accountability Norms) |
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Entry | Date |
---|---|
1NC Heg BadTournament: GSU | Round: 5 | Opponent: Northwestern MP | Judge: Topp, Sarah 1NC UnsustainableHeg is unsustainable – rising powers, overstretch and loss of economic powerLayne 11 ~Christopher Layne is the Associate Professor in the Bush School of Government and Public Service at Texas A26M University and Research Fellow with the Center on Peace and Liberty at The Independent Institute. "The unipolar exit: beyond the Pax Americana", Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 24:2, 149-164, Chetan~ U.S. heg gone nowSTRATFOR 4/25/2013 "Global Balance of Power Anarchy and Hegemony" http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article40135.html The Market Oracle Dollar primacy is failing – collapses hegemonyLuenen 10 ~Chris, research associate at the Global Policy Institute, London Metropolitan University, "The Coming Three-Bloc World," 11-16, Insight, Vol 1, Issue 3, pg 98-100~ Economic pressures will collapse hegemonyLayne 10 ~Christopher, Professor at Texas A26M’s George H.W. Bush School of Government 26 Public Service, "Graceful Decline," 5-1, http://www.amconmag.com/article/2010/may/01/00030/~~ Weaknesses in the fundamentals of the American economy have been accumulating for more than three 1NCUS hegemony will guarantee US-Sino conflict with flashpoints across AsiaLayne 12 ~Christopher Layne is the Associate Professor in the Bush School of Government and Public Service at Texas A26M University and Research Fellow with the Center on Peace and Liberty at The Independent Institute, "The Global Power Shift from West to East", April 25th, 2012, http://nationalinterest.org/article/the-global-power-shift-west-east-6796, Chetan~ Certainly, the Chinese have not forgotten. Now Beijing aims to dominate its own ExtinctionStraits Times – 2k ~"Regional Fallout: No one gains in war over Taiwan," June 25, Available Online via Lexis-Nexis~ 1NC – DiseaseHeg stops coordination that’s key to solve diseaseWeber et al. 7 *Steven Weber is a Professor of Political Science at UC-Berkeley and Director of the Institute of International Studies, Naazneen Barma, Matthew Kroenig, Ely Ratner, ~"How Globalization Went Bad", January-February 2007, Foreign Policy~ The same is true for global public health. Globalization is turning the world into Disease – It leads to extinctionGREGER 08 – M.D., is Director of Public Health and Animal Agriculture at The Humane Society of the United States (Michael Greger, , Bird Flu: A Virus of Our Own Hatching, http://birdflubook.com/a.php?id=111) 1NC – Iran WarPrimacy puts us on a collision course with Iran – turns your Middle East impactLayne 7 ~Christopher Layne, Associate Professor in the Bush School of Government and Public Service at Texas A26M University and Research Fellow with the Center on Peace and Liberty at The Independent Institute, 2007 ~"The Case Against the American Empire," American Empire: A Debate, Published by Routledge, ISBN 0415952034, p. 73-74~ Extinction 1NC – ProlifHeg cause prolif – multipolarity will solve itWeber et al 07 Professor of Political Science and Director of the Institute for International Studies at the University of California-Berkeley (Steven with Naazneen Barma, Matthew Kroenig, and Ely Ratner, Ph.D. Candidates at the University of California-Berkeley and Research Fellows at its New Era Foreign Policy Center, ~"How Globalization Went Bad," Foreign Policy, Issue 158, January/February,) Prolif’s extinctionMartin Hellman 8, Prof Emeritus of Engineering @ Stanford, "Defusing the Nuclear Threat: A Necessary First Step," http://www.nuclearrisk.org/statement.php 1NC – TerrorismHeg causes terror – 9/11 provesLayne 6 (Christopher, Associate Professor in the Bush School of Government and Public Service at Texas A 26 M University, 2006, The Peace of Illusions: American Grand Strategy from 1940 to the Present, p. 190-191) Terrorism will go nuclear - extinctionHellman 8 ~Martin E. Hellman, emeritus prof of engineering @ Stanford, "Risk Analysis of Nuclear Deterrence" SPRING 2008 THE BENT OF TAU BETA PI, http://www.nuclearrisk.org/paper.pdf~~ 1NC – WarHegemonic retrenchment’s key to avoid great power war—-maintaining unipolarity’s self-defeating which internal link-turns their offenseNuno P. Monteiro 12, Assistant Professor of Political Science at Yale University, "Unrest Assured: Why Unipolarity is Not Peaceful," International Security, Winter 2012, Vol. 36, No. 3, p. 9-40 1NC – Lots of WarsHegemonic retrenchment’s key to prevent war with Russia and China—-defuses Georgia, Taiwan and the South China SeasPaul K. MacDonald 11, Assistant Professor of Political Science at Williams College, and Joseph M. Parent, Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Miami, November/December 2011, "The Wisdom of Retrenchment: America Must Cut Back to Move Forward," Foreign Affairs, Vol. 90, No. 6 U.S. involvement in Georgia means conflict goes nuclearGuldseth 9, Adviser in Strategic Communication. Post graduate in "Media, Communication and ICT" Russia’s new military doctrine opens for first strike nuclear attacks in "local or regional wars", Eistein Guldseth, 10-14-2009 ExtinctionNick Bostrom 2, winner of the Gannon Award, March, Existential Risks: Analyzing Human Extinction Scenarios and Related Hazards, Journal of Evolution and Technology, p. http://www.nickbostrom.com/existential/risks.html U.S. involvement makes conflict over Taiwan go nuclear and destroys U.S.-China relationsCharles L. Glaser 11 is Professor in the Elliott School of International Affairs and the Department of Political Science, and Director of the Elliott School’s Institute for Security and Conflict Studies @ George Washington University, "Will China’s Rise Lead to War?" Foreign Affairs; Mar/Apr2011, Vol. 90 Issue 2, p80-91, 12p EBSCO | 9/22/13 |
Bioshock KTournament: Wake Forest | Round: 3 | Opponent: Rochester MW | Judge: Sciullo, Nick OffBring us the girl and wipe away your debt.This quest drives the story of Irrational Games’ Bioshock Infinite. You awake on a boat and are tasked sent to a mysterious lighthouse where you embark on a journey to a city in the sky Columbia.What does this quest mean? It is a rewriting of the quest we all strive for – saving the world. How does it play out? You select a goal and set a defined success condition for that goal.It’s all the same in debate:The debate community, along with society, has many collective debts and you have an obligation to bring us the ballot in order to sign your support for a movement.In fact, we’ve become so good at convincing ourselves that our approaches lead to solutions that we have lost sight of what reality is created. We need to analyze videogames to create better approximations of complex issues.Bogost 6 This always plays out the same and we always seek to quantify those goals with a specific end. The reality is that we don’t really know what success is because we don’t know how to define it.Bogost 7 That begs the question… what should we count instead? We don’t really know, but a key question brought up is the following: What is a constant and what is a variable? The alternative is to vote negative to smother the 1AC’s problematization of politics in the 1ac. Thomsen Elaborates. ~Dave Thomsen, April 1, 2013 , http://scriptroutine.wordpress.com/2013/04/01/its-all-been-done-before-bioshocks-infinity/~~ The solution isn’t a modification of policy or our community but a rejection of the presentation of how they presented the problem. We have no way of knowing if they are the right choice so our role is to initiate the discussion of what it means to smother the 1ac’s problems in their respective cribs. If you think this analysis is a good idea, you vote negative because you believe that our procedural approach is good.So what has the affirmative decided to do? Analyze the geneology racist detention policy. The United States’ collective evil is the constant and the targeted group is the variable. In reality, this all sounds familiar: Change our epistemology and we will somehow have solution.We need a new solution: a procedural approach to analyzing success and failure. This constitutes analyzing rules structures in our game to see what works and what doesn’t work and what commentary it makes on society as a whole.Bogost 7 This quantification creates bankrupt politics and branwashes us into thinking that we have succeeded. That’s not even close to the truth.Bogost 8 These power structure signify oppressive structure that will inevitably lead to extinction. Our analysis of bioshock create a new awareness of these class struggles.Dyer-Witheford and de Peuter 09 ~Nick Dyer-Witheford and Greig de Peuter, "Games of Empire: Global Capitalism and Video Games". University of Minnesota press: 2009 p. 201-202 RS~ The discursive control of neoliberalism has constrained society. We are all witnesses to the moral and physical extinction that neoliberalism will inevitably cause.Gounari 6 Our alternative is key to bring to light the neoliberal discourse of the 1ac. Analyzing the shortcomings of their simulation and of this game in general is key to understanding how the game supports the oppressive structures that actively ignore what happens at the local level.Dyer-Witheford and de Peuter 09 ~Nick Dyer-Witheford and Greig de Peuter, "Games of Empire: Global Capitalism and Video Games". University of Minnesota press: 2009 p. 227-9RS~ | 11/16/13 |
Bogost K - 1NCTournament: GSU | Round: 2 | Opponent: Georgetown ErMc | Judge: Lowry, Sean First is the Links:The affirmative approaches persuasion from a quantified perspective – this creates false metrics for what we consider successBogost 7 This isn’t unique to debate arguments – all aspects of our society are quantified. We should analyze rules structures and examine discourse as a metric of success.Bogost 7 This is problematic because it convinces us that the only measure of success is statistics. This means the affirmative ignores conversations and procedures that might or might not lead to success.Bogost 7 This creates 3 implicationsFirst - Value to life – seeking confirmation through quantitative means focuses debate on extrinsic rewards. Examining the game is key to finding intrinsic rewards.McGonigal 11 Second - Extinction – continuation of dominant status quo structures leads to every impactDyer-Witheford and de Peuter 09 ~Nick Dyer-Witheford and Greig de Peuter, "Games of Empire: Global Capitalism and Video Games". University of Minnesota press: 2009 p. 201-202 RS~ Third - Turns case - The affirmative’s simulation confuses the real from simulation – means we can never know what is realBogost 7 In humanistic academic discourse of the last several decades, materialism and consumption are almost The alternative is to vote negative in order to turn debate into a persuasive game.Start your approach by interrogating the procedural rhetoric of the 1AC – analyzing how the 1ac is coded is key to creating simulation fever.Bogost 7 Creating simulation fever is key to imagine alternatives to neoliberalismDyer-Witheford and de Peuter 09 ~Nick Dyer-Witheford and Greig de Peuter, "Games of Empire: Global Capitalism and Video Games". University of Minnesota press: 2009 p. 201-202 RS~ Analyzing procedures behind the affirmative’s simulation is key to understand contradictions and engage in criticismBogost 7 This is good for debate – analyzing the logic structures of the 1AC creates a new persuasion that inspires actionBogost 7 The affirmative is just a weak advertisement – procedural rhetoric of the 1ac doesn’t create a need for reduction of war powers – we just learn that nuclear war is bad.Bogost 7 Soft drink companies continue to use games as tools to penetrate the youth market, The 1AC’s model fails, only through procedural rhetoric can represent our positions. Their model just repeats status quo politics.Bogost 8 The alternative is the best way to question neoliberalism within debate – mobilizing our game creates a forum for planning our next step.Dyer-Witheford and de Peuter 09 ~Nick Dyer-Witheford and Greig de Peuter, "Games of Empire: Global Capitalism and Video Games". University of Minnesota press: 2009 p. 227-9RS~ The 1ac fails to model public policy – only the alternative leads to understanding the complexity behind politics of war powersBogost 6 | 9/21/13 |
Bogost K - ComplexityTournament: GSU | Round: 2 | Opponent: Georgetown ErMc | Judge: Lowry, Sean plan based approach wrongly interpolates complex issues. Procedural focus resolves this.Bogost 6 | 9/21/13 |
Bogost K - FrameworkTournament: GSU | Round: 2 | Opponent: Georgetown ErMc | Judge: Lowry, Sean Procedures dictate all parts of politics – our analysis is key to understanding policymaking.Bogost 7 Making our community into a gaming community creates opportunities to better understand and solve world problems.McGonigal 11 Understanding our relationship to the activity is necessary to incorporate procedural rhetoric into debate. This means the K comes first.Bogost 7 Spectatorship DA – focusing on procedural rhetoric is key to understand moral dilemmas. Narrative based approaches like the plan create a false understanding of why individuals choose villainous approaches.Schulzke 13 Video games are the only media for discussion not corrupted by politics and special interest. Modeling debate after games creates a safe locus of discussion of how we approach political problems.Bogost 6 | 9/21/13 |
Bogost K - PermutationTournament: GSU | Round: 4 | Opponent: Georgetown EnMc | Judge: Whitmore, Whit K comes first – debating about procedural rhetoric is key to imagining alternatives to neoliberalism.Redmond 12 Extinction DA - Including the affirmative makes debate into a game of empire that reinforces empire.Dyer-Witheford and de Peuter 09 ~Nick Dyer-Witheford and Greig de Peuter, "Games of Empire: Global Capitalism and Video Games". University of Minnesota press: 2009 p. 189-191 RS~ | 9/21/13 |
Bogost K - Short 1NCTournament: GSU | Round: 5 | Opponent: Northwestern MP | Judge: Topp, Sarah The affirmative approaches persuasion from a quantified perspective – this creates false metrics for what we consider successBogost 7 Impact is value to life – their approach to the 1ac focuses competition on extrinsic rewardsMcGonigal 11 The alternative is to reject the 1ac’s approach to simulation. The way the 1ac is coded means it’s not persuasive and you vote negative on presumption.Bogost 7 | 9/22/13 |
I-Law BadTournament: Vanderbilt | Round: 2 | Opponent: Wake Forest MS | Judge: Robisch, Kyle 1NCDefenseInternational law has no force – the US can break it at any time for any reason – this destroys its ability to ever succeedMichael Stokes Paulsen, Distinguished University Chair and Professor of Law, The University of St.Thomas School of Law ~Yale Law Journal – The Constitutional Power to Interpret International Law~ June 2009 Thus, though treaties are part of the supreme law of the land under the No environment impactBrook 13 Barry Brook Human Rights cred impossible – alt cause and broder system change is keyMariam 8/18/13 – PhD, JD, teaches political science at California State University, San Bernardino (Alemayehu, 8/18/2013, "Is America Disinventing Human Rights?," http://www.ethiopianreview.us/48632)JCP In his 1981 farewell speech, President Jimmy Carter Democracy 1NC( ). DemocracyIncorporation of international law hurts democracy and human rightsJohn O. McGinnis, Stanford Clinton, Sr. Professor of Law, Northwestern University School of Law and Ilya Somin, Assistant Professor of Law, George Mason University School of Law, ~84 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1739~ 2009 Our analysis rests on both theory and example. As a matter of theory we Democracy solves nuclear and biological warfare, genocide, and environmental destructionDiamond Hoover Institution, Stanford University 1995, Larry, December, PROMOTING DEMOCRACY IN THE 1990S, 1p. http://www.carnegie.org//sub/pubs/deadly/diam_rpt.html Human Rights 1NC( ) Human RightsHuman rights International law actively masks human rights abuses.Bandow 9 (Doug Bandow—Senior Fellow at the Cato Institute, "The Big Joke", June 15,http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=10290) Global human rights violations make extinction inevitableHuman Rights Web, 94 (An Introduction to the Human Rights Movement Created on July 20, 1994 / Last edited on January 25, 1997, http://www.hrweb.org/intro.html) The United Nations Charter, Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and UN Human Rights Terrorism 1NC( ). TerrorJudicial incorporation of international human rights law specifically constrains the President’s ability to fight the War on TerrorJohn O. McGinnis 9, Stanford Clinton, Sr. Professor of Law, Northwestern University School of Law and Ilya Somin, Assistant Professor of Law, George Mason University School of Law, ~84 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1739~ 2009 Another method for integrating international human rights law into domestic jurisprudence is to require that Cross Apply 1NC ImpactRule of Law 1NC( ) Rule of LawCourt incorporation of international law destroys the rule of lawDonald J. Kochan, Assistant Professor of Law, Chapman University School of Law, February 2006, Fordham International Law Journal, 29 Fordham Int’l L.J. 507, p. 507-508 With increasing frequency and heightened debate, n1 U.S. courts have been Rule of law key to freedom and prevents nuclear extinction.Rhyne, Washington Lawyer 58 (Charles S. Rhyne Law Day Speech for Voice of America delivered on the first Law Day, 1958) Law and courts exist to protect every citizen of the United States in his person 2NCAnd – The two most notable international human rights treaties are watered down garbage that make exceptions for destroying rightsJohn O. McGinnis, Stanford Clinton, Sr. Professor of Law, Northwestern University School of Law and Ilya Somin, Assistant Professor of Law, George Mason University School of Law, ~84 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1739~ 2009 A particularly important and underappreciated element of democracy deficit of international human rights law is ( ) It’s impossible to quantify the strength of international rights norms – means there’s no way to assess the impact of their advantageDouglass Cassel, Director of the Center for International Human Rights at Northwestern University School of Law, Spring 2001, Chicago Journal of International Law, 2 Chi. J. Int’l L. 121, p. 131 Quantifying the ultimate benefit for rights protection of all these interacting processes, or even ( ) Lack of an established framework for adjudicating international law means judges will make random and unpredictable decisions applying it – they can’t establish a coherent precedentErnesto J. Sanchez, ASIL member and law clerk at the U.S. Court of Federal Claims in Washington D.C., J.D., University of Pennsylvania, December 2005, Connecticut Law Review, 38 Conn. L. Rev. 185, p. 190 Foreign laws, however, do not stem from the same philosophical base, but Their authors have a personal incentive to exaggerate the impactSpencer 08 Roy Spence r, climatologist and a Principal Research Scientist for the University of Alabama in Huntsville, Ph.D. in meteorology at the University of Wisconsin-Madison in 1981, former Senior Scientist for Climate Studies at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center, where he and Dr. John Christy received NASA’s Exceptional Scientific Achievement Medal for their global temperature monitoring work with satellites, Climate Confusion, 2008 \AT: The DistinctionHere’s a 1AC Author – Gruber calls for the plan text in order to assume a leadership rule and uphold international law. This means that it creates a precedent and spills overGruber 11 (Aya- Professor of Law, University of Colorado Law School, 1/1, "An Unintended Casualty of the War on Terror", http://scholarworks.gsu.edu/gsulr/vol27/iss2/12/) Democracy 2NCTurns Case. Democracy is the existential precondition for international agreements.Wouters, Professor of International Law Leuven University, 2K4 I-law good impacts aren’t responsive—the alternatives are comparatively superiorMcGinnis, law prof, 7—Stanford Clinton, Sr. Professor of Law, Northwestern University School of Law (John and Ilya Somin-assistant law prof, George Mason, Should International Law Be Part of Our Law?, 59 Stan. L. Rev. 1175, http://lawreview.stanford.edu/content/vol59/issue5/mcginnis.pdf, AMiles) Plus – Domestic incorporation of international human rights laws hurt democracy and human rightsJohn O. McGinnis, Stanford Clinton, Sr. Professor of Law, Northwestern
| 11/1/13 |
Impact Defense - AT MiscalcTournament: GSU | Round: 8 | Opponent: Houston AlAs | Judge: Elliot, Scott Nuclear miscalculation theory false – defensive realism posits proportionality assessment comes firstClifton 11 (January 2011, Joseph K., Lead Information Technology Assistant at Claremont McKenna College, "Disputed Theory and Security Policy: Responding to the "Rise of China," http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=116426context=cmc_theses26sei-redir=1~~23search=22miscalculation20nuclear20war20rational20actors22) | 9/22/13 |
NEPA Neg - Gartland CPTournament: Wake Forest | Round: 5 | Opponent: Georgia DG | Judge: Slattery, Sean Counterplan Text: United States congress should establish a subcommittee charged with conducting periodic reviews of military National Environmental Policy Act compliance under the House and Senate Armed Services Committees.The Counterplan solves the aff and avoids our warfighting DA and circumvention. It competes because it does not remove the exception and is not a statutory restriction.Gartland 2012 ~ Charles J. "At war and peace with the National Environmental Policy Act: when political questions and the environment collide." Dec. 22. 2012, Published in the Air Force Law Review, http://www.thefreelibrary.com/At+war+and+peace+with+the+National+Environmental+Policy+Act3A+when...-a0297309170 RS~ | 11/17/13 |
NEPA neg - Warfighting LinksTournament: Wake Forest | Round: 5 | Opponent: Georgia DG | Judge: Slattery, Sean Limits prezGartland 12 Delay of applications of weapons – leads to lack of weaponsGartland 12 More EvGartland 12 | 11/17/13 |
T vs GSU FNTournament: Vanderbilt | Round: 6 | Opponent: GSU FN | Judge: Lee, Ed TopicalityA. Restrictions are prohibitions on action — oversight is merely a supervision conditionSchiedler-Brown 12 (Jean, Attorney, Jean Schiedler-Brown 26 Associates, Appellant Brief of Randall Kinchloe v. States Dept of Health, Washington, The Court of Appeals of the State of Washington, Division 1, http://www.courts.wa.gov/content/Briefs/A01/68642920Appellant20Randall20Kincheloe27s.pdf) 3. The ordinary definition of the term "restrictions" also does not include ’Indefinite detention’ is detainment without a trial where the individual doesn’t know when or whether they will be releasedRobideau 13 — Center for Victims of Torture, Media Relations Manager (Brad, 7/24/2013, "CVT Submits Testimony to Senate Judiciary Committee on Indefinite Detention at Guantanamo," http://www.cvt.org/news-events/press-releases/cvt-submits-testimony-senate-judiciary-committee-indefinite-detention) "CVT opposes indefinite detention, which we define as detention without trial for an War power is the power to conduct warHIRABAYASHI v. UNITED STATES - SUPREME COURT - June 21, 1943, Decided, 320 U.S. 81; 63 S. Ct. 1375; 87 L. Ed. 1774; 1943 U.S. LEXIS 1109 Aff deals with recognition of foreign sovereignChong 9-10 2013 ~Jane, "Government Files Response in Aamer v. Obama" http://www.lawfareblog.com/2013/09/government-files-response-in-aamer-v-obama/ RS~ B. Aff doesn’t prohibit the president’s exercise of war powers authority and doesn’t prohibit indefinite detention.C. Vote Neg –
2. Ground – Restriction ground is the locus of neg prep – their interpretation jacks all core disads – politics, presidential powers, and any area based disad because an aff doesn’t have to prevent the president from doing anything | 11/2/13 |
Thermodynamics KTournament: Kentucky | Round: 1 | Opponent: Georgia DaGa | Judge: Ridley, Sean Ecological rhetoric and environmental protection are masked and counterfeit movements. Invoking singular science of the 1ac creates dualism that is drowned by economic discourse.Child 2011 ~Matthew F., Conservation Science Group, University of Cambridge, "Conservation of Adaptive Self-Construction: A Flux-Centred Solution to the Paradox of Nature Preservation" Environmental Values Volume 20 (2011) 527-548. © 2011 The White Horse Press, p.529-531 RS~ Impossible to solve warming in the status quo – no reasonKysar 2001 ~Douglas A. "Sustainability, Distribution, and the Macroeconomic Analysis of Law" Yale Law School http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=145726context=fss_papers PDF. P.13-15~ The alternative is to reject the affirmative’s call for sustainability and define production in terms of entropy. Absolute rejection is necessary to avoid feedback loops. This is necessary to prevent exclusion and extinction.Gare 2000 ~Arran, Australian philosopher known mainly for his work in environmental philosophy, philosophy of science, philosophy of culture and the metaphysics of process philosophy, "Human Ecology, Process Philosophy And The Global Ecological Crisis" 5-9 RS~ How then should ecology be understood? Two main strands have emerged within the discipline | 10/5/13 |
Warfighting DATournament: Vanderbilt | Round: 3 | Opponent: UGAEmory SS | Judge: Delong, Brian 1NC Warfighting DAJudicial deference to executive war powers high nowMcCormack 13, Professor of Law at Utah ====Judicial restriction of Presidential War Powers makes warfighting impossible==== Court decisions spill over – military decisionmakingChesney et al 10 – Senior Fellow of Governance Studies @ Brookings Executive control of warmaking is key to avoiding nuclear war and terrorismLi 9 - J.D. candidate, Georgetown University Law Center, 2009; B.A., political science and history, Yale University (Zheyao, "War Powers for the Fourth Generation: Constitutional Interpretation in the Age of Asymmetric Warfare," 7 Geo. J.L. 26 Pub. Pol’y 373 2009 WAR POWERS IN THE FOURTH GENERATION OF WARFARE) 2NC Impact DebateThe impact is leadership and every global crisisBerkowitz, 8 - research fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University and a senior analyst at RAND. He is currently a consultant to the Defense Department and the intelligence community (Bruce, STRATEGIC ADVANTAGE: CHALLENGERS, COMPETITORS, AND THREATS TO AMERICA’S FUTURE, p. 1-4) THIS BOOK is intended to help readers better understand the national security issues facing the ExtinctionBarnett 11 (Thomas, Former Senior Strategic Researcher and Professor in the Warfare Analysis 26 Research Department, worked as the Assistant for Strategic Futures in the Office of Force Transformation in the Department of Defense, "The New Rules: Leadership Fatigue Puts U.S., and Globalization, at Crossroads," The World Politics Review, March 7, 2011, http://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/articles/8099/the-new-rules-leadership-fatigue-puts-u-s-and-globalization-at-crossroads) Events in Libya are a further reminder for Americans that we stand at a crossroads Prefer our impacts – Eurasia is comparatively more important than African conflictAshley 12 2NC Link DebateCourt interference into executive war powers spill over –1.) Litigation – the court asks follow-up questionsAndrew McCarthy 09, Director of the Center for Law 26 Counterterrorism at the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies. From 1985 through 2003, he was a federal prosecutor at the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York, and was the lead prosecutor in the seditious conspiracy trial against Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman and eleven others, described subsequently. AND Alykhan Velshi, a staff attorney at the Center for Law 26 Counterterrorism, where he focuses on the international law of armed conflict and the use of force, 8/20/09, "Outsourcing American Law," AEI Working Paper, http://www.aei.org/files/2009/08/20/20090820-Chapter6.pdf Empirically, judicial demands on executive branch procedural compliance, if unchecked, become steadily 2.) Precedent – future decisions build on the affGreen ’9 Another lesson from sixty years of wartime cases concerns the role of precedent itself in 3.) Chain of command – the plan disrupts the principle of unity of command by inserting the courtsFenster et al ’10 "Unity of command," and its corollary, " | 11/2/13 |
X-O CPTournament: Vanderbilt | Round: 3 | Opponent: UGAEmory SS | Judge: Delong, Brian Courts FailCourt politics – judges recognize political constraints to unpopular decisions in wartime – so the aff might fiat the plan, but they can’t fiat adherence to precedent by subsequent courts – who have strong reasons not to conform – the history of court crisis politics provesPosner and Vermeule, 7 – *Kirkland and Ellis Professor of Law at the University of Chicago Law School AND professor at Harvard Law School (Eric and Adrian, Terror in the Balance: Security, Liberty, and the Courts p. 56) Finally, to the extent that the critics of executive power envision judicial review as Decentralization of the judiciary – the Supreme Court can’t regulate lower courts and there will be strongly divergent decisionsPosner and Vermeule, 10 - *professor of law at the University of Chicago AND professor of law at Harvard (Eric and Adrian, The Executive Unbound, p. 29-30) The gap between the executive and the judiciary, in information and expertise, is Congress ConstrainsThe permutation ruins the fine balancing act and allows Congress to enact overbroad restrictions on presidential authorityNelson, 9/5 (Colleen, 9/5/2013, "Obama’s Curbs on Executive Power Draw Fire," http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323893004579057463262293446.html)) President Barack Obama, who pledged to push his second-term domestic agenda through | 11/2/13 |
Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
---|
Air Force
Amherst
Appalachian State
Arizona State
Army
Augustana
Bard
Baylor
Binghamton
Boston College
Capital
CSU Long Beach
CSU Northridge
CSU Sacramento
CUNY
Cal Berkeley
Cal Lutheran
Cal Poly SLO
Case Western
Central Florida
Central Oklahoma
Chico
Clarion
Columbia
Concordia
Cornell
Dartmouth
Denver
Drexel-Swarthmore
ENMU
East Los Angeles College
Eastern Washington
Emory
Emporia
Fayetteville State
Florida
Florida Int'l
Florida State
Fordham
Fresno State
Fullerton
Gainesville State
George Mason
George Washington
Georgetown
Georgia
Georgia State
Georgia Tech
Gonzaga
Harvard
Houston
Idaho State
Illinois
Illinois State
Indiana
Iowa
Irvine/SFSU
James Madison
John Carroll
Johns Hopkins
Johnson County CC
KCKCC
Kansas
Kansas State
Kentucky
LA City College
Lakeland
Lewis-Clark State College
Liberty
Lindenwood
Los Rios
Louisville
Loyola
Macalester
Marist
Mary Washington
Mercer
Methodist
Miami FL
Miami OH
Michigan
Michigan State
Minnesota
Mission
Missouri State
NYU
Navy
New School
North Texas
Northern Iowa
Northwestern
Notre Dame
Ohio Wesleyan
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pepperdine
Piedmont
Pittsburgh
Portland State
Princeton
Puget Sound
Redlands
Richmond
Rochester
Rutgers
Samford
San Diego State
San Francisco State
Santa Clara
South Florida St Pete
Southern Methodist
Southwestern
Stanford
Texas State
Texas-Austin
Texas-Dallas
Texas-San Antonio
Texas-Tyler
Towson
Trinity
U Chicago
UCLA
UDC-CC
UMKC
UNLV
USC
Utah
Vanderbilt
Vermont
Virginia Tech
Wake Forest
Wash U (St. Louis)
Washburn
Washington
Wayne State
Weber
West Georgia
West Virginia
Western Connecticut
Whitman
Wichita State
Wisconsin Oshkosh
Wyoming