General Actions:
Wiki: opencaselist13
▼:
Document Index
»
Space: Georgia Tech
▼:
Document Index
»
Page: Johnson-Saenz Aff
Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Video | Edit/Delete |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Contact Info | 1 | Georgia Tech JS | Georgia Tech JS |
| ||||
GSU | 1 | Georgia BoFe | Ridley, Sean |
| ||||
GSU | 3 | Trinity RoYo | Baker, Will |
| ||||
GSU | 1 | Georgia BoFe | Ridley, Sean |
| ||||
Vanderbilt | 5 | Emory GJ | Neighbors, Len |
| ||||
Vanderbilt | 4 | Wake Forest PP | Shane, Jonathan |
| ||||
Vanderbilt | 1 | Indiana PS | Bellon, Joe |
| ||||
Wake Forest | 2 | Houston JJ | Bellon, Joe |
| ||||
Wake Forest | 4 | Emory KL | Revelins, Armands |
| ||||
Wake Forest | 6 | Louisville BL | Reynolds, Caitlin |
|
Tournament | Round | Report |
---|---|---|
Contact Info | 1 | Opponent: Georgia Tech JS | Judge: Georgia Tech JS For Cites Email |
GSU | 1 | Opponent: Georgia BoFe | Judge: Ridley, Sean 1AC MGS4 Procedural Rhetorics |
GSU | 3 | Opponent: Trinity RoYo | Judge: Baker, Will 1AC MGS4 Aff |
GSU | 1 | Opponent: Georgia BoFe | Judge: Ridley, Sean 1AC MGS4 Procedural Rhetorics |
Vanderbilt | 5 | Opponent: Emory GJ | Judge: Neighbors, Len 1AC - Ackerman (Same as above) |
Vanderbilt | 4 | Opponent: Wake Forest PP | Judge: Shane, Jonathan 1AC MGS4 Aff (Kentucky) |
Vanderbilt | 1 | Opponent: Indiana PS | Judge: Bellon, Joe 1AC - Ackerman Aff |
Wake Forest | 2 | Opponent: Houston JJ | Judge: Bellon, Joe 1AC MGS4 Aff - Vanderbilt Version |
Wake Forest | 4 | Opponent: Emory KL | Judge: Revelins, Armands 1AC MGS4 Aff |
Wake Forest | 6 | Opponent: Louisville BL | Judge: Reynolds, Caitlin 1AC FF12 |
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Entry | Date |
---|---|
000Contact InfoTournament: Contact Info | Round: 1 | Opponent: Georgia Tech JS | Judge: Georgia Tech JS | 11/2/13 |
Ackerman - 1AC VanderbiltTournament: Vanderbilt | Round: 1 | Opponent: Indiana PS | Judge: Bellon, Joe DemocracyAdvantage 1 is Democracy -Status quo has mass violations of separation of powersAckerman and Hathaway, Yale professors, 11 The recent Iraq war exemplifies this challenge. When *Congress* authorized the invasion Plan is key to prevent cascading presidential authority – risking U.S. democratic collapseShane 9 ~Peter M. - Chair in Law at the Ohio State University’s Moritz College of Law, internationally recognized authority on constitutional and administrative law. May 2009, Excerpt from "Madison’s Nightmare: How Executive Power Threatens American Democracy," http://www.press.uchicago.edu/Misc/Chicago/749396.html For the last quarter century, the checks and balances of American government have been D-RuleCarter 87 Global democratic transitions are inevitable—-the only way for the US to bolster democracies is constitutionalism—-prevents warFareed Zakaria 97, PhD Poli Sci @ Harvard, Managing Editor of Foreign Affairs, 1997, Lexis Democratic liberalism is backsliding now—-the US model of an unrestrained executive causes collapseLarry Diamond 9, Professor of Political Science and Sociology @ Stanford, "The Impact of the Global Financial Crisis on Democracy", Presented to the SAIS-CGD Conference on New Ideas in Development after the Financial Crisis, Conference Paper that can be found on his Vita EngagementAdvantage 2 is deliberationObama is pursuing endless war in the Middle EastLandler 9/24 Unilateral executive war powers leads to groupthink – leads to prolonged wars and more errorsFleischman 10 America is retrenching and countries are rising - selective engagement is the best strategy to avoid great power wars – comparative evidenceAshley 12 Plan leads to selective engagement.Ackerman and Hathaway, Yale professors, 11—Ackerman, Professor of Law and Political Science, Yale, and Hathaway, Professor of International Law, Yale (Bruce and Oona, "Limited war and the Constitution: Iraq and the crisis of presidential Legality", 1 February 2011, Michigan Law Review, Volume 109; Issue 4, twm) As long as the costs of defiance seem very high at Period Three, they Selective engagement maintains regional stability, alliances, international economic orderHoffman 13 The offensive foreign policy of the United States has caused free-riding from allies and risks involvement in unnecessary warsPosen 13 PlanUnited States Congress should adopt Rules for Limited War as specified by Ackerman and Hathaway.The strategic use of emergency appropriations allowed the president to engage in “bait-and-switch” tactics that undermined effective democratic control over the use of military force. Following the Iraq precedent, future presidents will be able to “bait” Congress and the American people into approving a limited war, and then “switch” to a much longer war with more ambitious objectives. Serious congressional consideration of these escalat- ing war aims will be short-circuited by the repeated use of the “emergency” appropriations device. This diagnosis suggests the need for an institutional remedy. The Iraq case shows that it is not enough for the initial authorization of force to specify the limited purposes of the war. It must also specify the limited time period for the conflict, requiring the president to return for an explicit reauthorization if he wishes to extend the war beyond the preset period. This can be accomplished by either the House or the Senate using its constitutional authority to “determine the Rules of its Proceedings.” The Constitution gives either chamber the authority to change its rules governing future authorizations for the use of force. Under our proposed “Rules for Limited War,” all future authorizations will be valid for only two years unless the House or Senate sets a different time-limit—or declares that the war should continue, without limit, until victory is achieved. But unless Congress makes this decision explicit in its initial authorizing resolution, the two-year term will serve as a default rule. The new rules will be enforced through a prohibition on all war appropriations after the congressional dead- line, except for money needed to wind down the mission over the course of one year. Our proposal is designed to be both politically feasible and instrumen-tally effective in controlling the democratic pathologies of a presidential bait-and-switch. It builds on precedents developed by Congress to control the use of the appropriations power. Even if only a single chamber adopts the new rules, this action will catalyze a recalibration of our real-world sys- tem of checks and balances. The rules will have a significant impact on congressional–presidential relations long before matters reach the moment of final confrontation—when the president, after failing to convince Con-gress to authorize a further extension of the war effort, confronts a one-year “wind up” appropriation for the orderly withdrawal of troops from the battle zone. It is important to analyze the options available to the president and Con-gress at this “showdown stage,” when the appropriations cut-off becomes operational. But it is no less important to consider how the prospect of a “final showdown” fundamentally alters incentives at earlier stages in the war- making process—starting with the moment the president asks Congress for an initial war authorization, and continuing through the period when the cut-off date begins to loom large on the horizon. In a properly designed system, the new rules will generate a far more candid and democratic process during these earlier periods, without the president and Congress ever pushing the matter to a final showdown. And the president will be confronted with very unattractive options if he forces a showdown by trying to extend the war unilaterally after the final one-year wind-up appropriation has expired. Once one chamber adopts the new rules, its counterpart will be pressed to give them serious consideration and it may adopt the reform or join the effort through a concurrent resolution or statute. Our multiperiod analysis permits a more precise assessment of the extent to which these supportive efforts by the second chamber will enhance the system’s operation. We also offer our framework as a more general model for the analysis of separation- of-powers problems—which typically content themselves with a static analysis without self-consciously considering the way rule systems affect institutional dynamics over time. Plan solvesAckerman and Hathaway, Yale professors, 11—Ackerman, Professor of Law and Political Science, Yale, and Hathaway, Professor of International Law, Yale (Bruce and Oona, "Limited war and the Constitution: Iraq and the crisis of presidential Legality", 1 February 2011, Michigan Law Review, Volume 109; Issue 4, twm) Failure to grasp national will and create coherent strategies causes failures in foreign policies – congressional authorization keyGallagher 11 | 11/15/13 |
Ackerman - 2AC - CIR Politics DATournament: Vanderbilt | Round: 5 | Opponent: Emory GJ | Judge: Neighbors, Len Won’t pass – gop- not priorityBowen 11/1
PC won’t pass and not key to immigrationRussell Berman 10/25/2013, "GOP comfortable ignoring Obama pleas for vote on immigration bill," Hill, http://thehill.com/homenews/house/330527-gop-comfortable-ignoring-obama-pleas-to-move-to-immigration-reform Plan BipartGelb 5 Winner’s winHirsh 13 Michael, chief correspondent for National Journal; citing Ornstein, a political scientist and scholar at the American Enterprise Institute and Bensel, gov’t prof at Cornell, "There’s No Such Thing as Political Capital", 2/7, www.nationaljournal.com/magazine/there-s-no-such-thing-as-political-capital-20130207 Won’t pass – Obama approval ratingSanchez 10/31 No link - The plan would cost members of congress political capital not Obama.Ackerman, Professor of Law and Political Science, Yale, and Hathaway, Professor of International Law, Yale ’11 (Bruce and Oona, "Limited war and the Constitution: Iraq and the crisis of presidential Legality", 1 February 2011, Michigan Law Review, Volume 109; Issue 4, twm) From this perspective, the proposed plan provides as much certainty as is reasonable to expect. A good deal of political effort will be required to ~*511~ establish the new Rules for Limited War - with many congressional leaders committing their time and energy to the innovation. This will create a great deal of political momentum during the first generation of reform - with established leaders reluctant to go back on one of their prouder achievements. Reform fails—-changes cause backlogMurthy 9 Law Firm, "What if CIR Passes? Can USCIS Handle the Increased Workload?", NewsBrief, 10-30, http://www.murthy.com/news/n_cirwkl.html Obama push irrelevantMiami Herald 11/1 No risk of cyber attack and even if it happens no impactDouglas Birch 10-1, former foreign correspondent for the Associated Press and the Baltimore Sun who has written extensively on technology and public policy, 10/1/12, "Forget Revolution," Foreign Policy, http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2012/10/01/forget_revolution?page=full | 11/2/13 |
Ackerman - 2AC - Courts CPTournament: Vanderbilt | Round: 5 | Opponent: Emory GJ | Judge: Neighbors, Len CP doesn’t send a clear signal, undermines SOP, and gets delayed – true even if they rule on SOP groundsEntin 12 Perm do both—-shields the linkPerine, 6/12/2008 (Katherine – staff at CQ politics, Congress unlikely to try to counter Supreme Court detainee ruling, CQ Politics, p. http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docID=news-00000289652826cpage=2) This is plan plus, Supreme Court plus the planEmpirically, courts will find a way to circumvent any measures intended to make them check Presidential power.Cato Institute ’09 ("Reclaiming the War Power, http://www.cato.org/pubs/handbook/hb111/hb111-10.pdf, twm) Representative Jones’s Constitutional War Powers Resolution, which seeks to draw the judiciary into the struggle to constrain executive war making, ignores the Court’s resistance to congressional standing, as well as the 30-year history of litigation under the War Powers Resolution, a history that shows how adept the federal judiciary is at constructing rationales that allow it to avoid picking sides in battles between Congress and the president. Courts alone don’t solveTaylor 13 ~Paul Taylor, Senior Fellow at the Center for Policy 26 Research, JD from Seton Hall Law School, "A FISC for Drones?" Feb 9 2013, http://transparentpolicy.org/2013/02/a-fisc-for-drones/~~ | 11/2/13 |
Ackerman - 2AC - Security KTournament: Vanderbilt | Round: 5 | Opponent: Emory GJ | Judge: Neighbors, Len Security discourse is inevitable—rejection risks replicating the harms.Williams 3 Perm do both—combining epistemological questioning with pragmatic political action produces the best knowledge and effective political engagementKratochwil, IR Prof @ Columbia, 8 ~Friedrich Kratochwil is Assistant Professor of International Relations at Columbia University, Pragmatism in International Relations "Ten points to ponder about pragmatism" p11-25~ The role of the ballot’s to endorse a political strategy of civic engagement with institutionsMCCLEAN 1, SOCIETY FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF AMERICAN PHILOSOPHY – GRADUATE AND PHILOSOPHER – NYU ~DAVID E., "THE CULTURAL LEFT AND THE LIMITS OF SOCIAL HOPE", http://www.american-philosophy.org/archives/200120Conference/Discussion20papers/david_mcclean.htm~~ Threats real and not constructed—rational risk assessment goes affKnudsen 1– PoliSci Professor at Sodertorn (Olav, Post-Copenhagen Security Studies, Security Dialogue 32:3) This proves their method is bankruptTara McCormack 10, Lecturer in International Politics at the University of Leicester, PhD in IR from the University of Westminster, "Critique, Security and Power: The Political Limits to Emancipatory Approaches," p. 59, google books | 11/2/13 |
Ackerman - 2AC T - Statutory RestrictionTournament: Vanderbilt | Round: 5 | Opponent: Emory GJ | Judge: Neighbors, Len 2. counter interp —- Statutory restrictions must be legislative limitsThe Law Dictionary 13 "What is Statutory Restriction?, The Law Dictionary: Featuring Black’s Law Dictionary Free Online Legal Dictionary 2nd Edition, Accessed 7-22-2013, http://thelawdictionary.org/statutory-restriction/ A restriction on war powers authority limits Presidential discretionJules Lobel 8, Professor of Law at the University of Pittsburgh Law School, President of the Center for Constitutional Rights, represented members of Congress challenging assertions of Executive power to unilaterally initiate warfare, "Conflicts Between the Commander in Chief and Congress: Concurrent Power over the Conduct of War," Ohio State Law Journal, Vol 69, p 391, 2008, http://moritzlaw.osu.edu/students/groups/oslj/files/2012/04/69.3.lobel_.pdf | 11/2/13 |
FF12 - 1AC WakeTournament: Wake Forest | Round: 6 | Opponent: Louisville BL | Judge: Reynolds, Caitlin Neoliberal discourse has imposed identities upon society. FF12 criticizes the neoliberal identity politics and creates a transnational intersection of race, gender, ethnicity, and sexuality that breaks free of Euro-American identity politicsRedmond 12 The legitimization of neoliberalism and identity politics has caused the loss of freedom. FF12 shows that refusal of hegemonic identity politics and postcolonial nationalism allows us to move towards new ideologies.Redmond continues The discursive control of neoliberalism has constrained society. We are all witnesses to the moral and physical extinction that neoliberalism will inevitably cause.Gounari 6 Our affirmative embraces an alternative not through some utopian action but by allowing imagination of alternatives to neoliberalism. Our process of debate and deliberation is key to exploring the videogame commons and challenging neoliberal control over ideology.Redmond 12 Prefer our procedural approach - status quo is just a collection of snapshots being sent back and forward.Bogost 7 Voting affirmative is a disruption of neoliberalist war powers through the thought experiment of Final Fantasy 12. The role of the affirmative is to rethink the way that we engage in war and how the discourse of these ideologies shape identities.Video games allow us to question political systems, social and cultural practices. They need to be used as argumentative practice in debatingBogost 8 The public space of debate is a critical arena to question neoliberalism and reclaim our agencyGounari 6 | 11/17/13 |
MGS4 - 1AC GSUTournament: GSU | Round: 1 | Opponent: Georgia BoFe | Judge: Ridley, Sean Neoliberalism has declared war on all discourses. It has shifted our priorities, and caused creative destruction to our way of life. Metal Gear Solid 4 presents an open criticism of this neoliberal system by pointing out the inevitable conclusion of our war policies: Endless war in the name of controlRedmond 12 Our affirmative embraces an alternative not through some utopian action but by allowing imagination of alternatives to neoliberalism. Our process of debate and deliberation is key to exploring the videogame commons and challenging neoliberal control over ideology.Redmond 12 We are relevant to the topic – Metal Gear Solid 4 is an open criticism of offensive cyber operationsWright et al. 10 Practicing the values within the game allows us to better understand what allows neoliberalism to dominate society in the first place and challenge it.Knopf 12 Neoliberalism produces crises, securitizes them and militarily lashes out against them-this cycle triggers every impact and terminates in extinction.Mosaddeq, Sussex University IR professor, 2010 Neoliberalism makes disposable those it renders have nots and makes them socially invisibleGiroux, McMaster cultural studies professor, 2008 Status quo political science has failed, we need to en | 11/2/13 |
MGS4 - 1AC VanderbiltTournament: Vanderbilt | Round: 4 | Opponent: Wake Forest PP | Judge: Shane, Jonathan Neoliberalism has dominated all modes of thought – Metal Gear solid 4 demonstrates this domination in its opening sequenceRedmond 12 The single most important change between MGS4 and previous iterations of the series is 72 The ending demonstrates the false choice that we face today: support neoliberalism or imagine alternatives to market domination. The ending of MGS4 shows that this is a false choice and shows a third option. Redmond Continues The discursive control of neoliberalism has blinded society. We are all witnesses to the moral and physical extinction that neoliberalism will inevitably cause.Gounari 6 This debate and deliberation is key to exploring the videogame commons and challenging neoliberal control over ideology.Redmond Concludes Prefer our procedural approach - status quo is just a collection of snapshots being sent back and forward.Bogost 7 Voting affirmative is a disruption of neoliberalist war powers through the thought experiment of Metal Gear Solid 4. The role of the affirmative should be to rethink the way that we engage in war.Video games allow us to question political systems, social and cultural practices. They need to be used as argumentative practice in debatingBogost 8 The public space of debate is a critical arena to question neoliberalism and reclaim our a | 11/2/13 |
MGS4 - 2AC vs IntersectionalityTournament: Vanderbilt | Round: 4 | Opponent: Wake Forest PP | Judge: Shane, Jonathan 1. Perm Do both- Thought experiments through games allow the examination of important philosophical questionsSchulzke 13 3. We can use video games as a starting point for critical race theoriesHiggin 11 Since the importance of race to games 6. Games Key to AgencyMcGonigal 11 10. MGS4 allows us to critically examine gender equityRedmond 12 a. Current political discourse fails – only video games used as procedural rhetoric allows the best locus for discussions about political problemsBogost 6 b. Video games are better for decision making – they get to be involved in simulations of decisions, instead of spectators, while avoiding a moral stand stillSchulzke 13 c. Video games allow us to question political systems, social and cultural practices. They need to be used as argumentative practice in debatingBogost 8 Social death is descriptively inaccurate and reinforces fatalism—the truth is that it’s easier to write off gains under antagonismClark, professor of law – Catholic University, ’95 A Final Word Despite Professor Bell’s prophecy of doom, I believe he would like 12. The permutation is a linkage of struggles – without an affirmation of solidarity there’s no chance for change | 11/2/13 |
MGS4 - AT Cap KTournament: GSU | Round: 3 | Opponent: Trinity RoYo | Judge: Baker, Will Thought experiments allow the examination of important philosophical questionsSchulzke 13 Creating simulation fever is key to imagine alternatives to neoliberalismDyer-Witheford and de Peuter 09 ~Nick Dyer-Witheford and Greig de Peuter, "Games of Empire: Global Capitalism and Video Games". University of Minnesota press: 2009 p. 201-202 RS~ Analyzing procedures behind the affirmative’s simulation is key to understand contradictions and engage in criticismBogost 7 The alternative is the best way to question neoliberalism within debate – mobilizing our game creates a forum for planning our next step.Dyer-Witheford and de Peuter 09 ~Nick Dyer-Witheford and Greig de Peuter, "Games of Empire: Global Capitalism and Video Games". University of Minnesota press: 2009 p. 227-9RS~ | 9/21/13 |
MGS4 - AT Play other gamesTournament: GSU | Round: 3 | Opponent: Trinity RoYo | Judge: Baker, Will MGS is the most significant mainstream game to have a successful and consistent anti-militarization message to societyRobinson 12 | 9/21/13 |
MGS4 - AT SexualizationTournament: GSU | Round: 3 | Opponent: Trinity RoYo | Judge: Baker, Will MGS4 is one of the best videogamesRedmond 12 The structure of their argument undermines feminism—the claim that a single link results in a big "root cause" impact marginalizes struggles against other forms of violence and discrimination | 9/21/13 |
MGS4 Aff - Framework CardsTournament: GSU | Round: 3 | Opponent: Trinity RoYo | Judge: Baker, Will 11. Current political discourse fails – only video games used as procedural rhetoric allows the best locus for discussions about political problemsBogost 6 Video games are better for decision making – they get to be involved in simulations of decisions, instead of spectators, while avoiding a moral stand stillSchulzke 13 | 9/21/13 |
Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
---|
Air Force
Amherst
Appalachian State
Arizona State
Army
Augustana
Bard
Baylor
Binghamton
Boston College
Capital
CSU Long Beach
CSU Northridge
CSU Sacramento
CUNY
Cal Berkeley
Cal Lutheran
Cal Poly SLO
Case Western
Central Florida
Central Oklahoma
Chico
Clarion
Columbia
Concordia
Cornell
Dartmouth
Denver
Drexel-Swarthmore
ENMU
East Los Angeles College
Eastern Washington
Emory
Emporia
Fayetteville State
Florida
Florida Int'l
Florida State
Fordham
Fresno State
Fullerton
Gainesville State
George Mason
George Washington
Georgetown
Georgia
Georgia State
Georgia Tech
Gonzaga
Harvard
Houston
Idaho State
Illinois
Illinois State
Indiana
Iowa
Irvine/SFSU
James Madison
John Carroll
Johns Hopkins
Johnson County CC
KCKCC
Kansas
Kansas State
Kentucky
LA City College
Lakeland
Lewis-Clark State College
Liberty
Lindenwood
Los Rios
Louisville
Loyola
Macalester
Marist
Mary Washington
Mercer
Methodist
Miami FL
Miami OH
Michigan
Michigan State
Minnesota
Mission
Missouri State
NYU
Navy
New School
North Texas
Northern Iowa
Northwestern
Notre Dame
Ohio Wesleyan
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pepperdine
Piedmont
Pittsburgh
Portland State
Princeton
Puget Sound
Redlands
Richmond
Rochester
Rutgers
Samford
San Diego State
San Francisco State
Santa Clara
South Florida St Pete
Southern Methodist
Southwestern
Stanford
Texas State
Texas-Austin
Texas-Dallas
Texas-San Antonio
Texas-Tyler
Towson
Trinity
U Chicago
UCLA
UDC-CC
UMKC
UNLV
USC
Utah
Vanderbilt
Vermont
Virginia Tech
Wake Forest
Wash U (St. Louis)
Washburn
Washington
Wayne State
Weber
West Georgia
West Virginia
Western Connecticut
Whitman
Wichita State
Wisconsin Oshkosh
Wyoming