General Actions:
Wiki: opencaselist13
▼:
Document Index
»
Space: Georgia State
▼:
Document Index
»
Page: Nails-Finch Neg
Tournament | Round | Opponent | Judge | Cites | Round Report | Open Source | Video | Edit/Delete |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMU | 4 | GMU BW |
| |||||
JMU | 1 | Vanderbilt BM | Woodruff |
| ||||
Kentucky | 7 | Houston | Quigley |
| ||||
Kentucky | 5 | Dartmouth |
| |||||
NA | 1 | NA | NA |
| ||||
Vanderbilt | 5 | Wake Forest PePh | Kristen Porter |
| ||||
Vanderbilt | 1 | Wake Forest CrHa | Edmund Zagorin |
|
Tournament | Round | Report |
---|---|---|
JMU | 4 | Opponent: GMU BW | Judge: 1AC overturn Kiyemba 1NC fx T Reform CP Readiness DA Weak Onto K 2NR Readiness and Condo Good |
JMU | 1 | Opponent: Vanderbilt BM | Judge: Woodruff 1NC T Ex post CP Drone shift DA case 2NR Case turns |
Kentucky | 7 | Opponent: Houston | Judge: Quigley 1AC NFU 1NC T XO PTX 2NR XO PTX |
Kentucky | 5 | Opponent: Dartmouth | Judge: 1AC was Women in Combat 2NR was restrictions PIC and ExFlex DA |
Vanderbilt | 5 | Opponent: Wake Forest PePh | Judge: Kristen Porter 1AC was Zapatismo politics (no plan) 1NC was Topicality (must defend topical plan) Interpassivity K and state good on case |
Vanderbilt | 1 | Opponent: Wake Forest CrHa | Judge: Edmund Zagorin 1NC Weak Ontology K CIR Ptx Security K Case 2NC Weak Onto K 1NR Security K 2NR Weak Onto K |
To modify or delete round reports, edit the associated round.
Entry | Date |
---|---|
000 List of 2NRsTournament: NA | Round: 1 | Opponent: NA | Judge: NA KentuckyR1 v Army -- Vagueness JMUR1 v Vandy -- Case Turns (ILaw Bad) VanderbiltR1 v Wake Forest -- Weak Ontology K | 11/23/13 |
111 ASPECTournament: Kentucky | Round: 5 | Opponent: Dartmouth | Judge: | 11/11/13 |
111 FrameworkTournament: Vanderbilt | Round: 5 | Opponent: Wake Forest PePh | Judge: Kristen Porter Our interpretation is that the aff should affirm some federal government action to restrict one or more of the topical presidential war powers."USFG should" means they should defend topical actionJon M. ERICSON, Dean Emeritus of the College of Liberal Arts – California Polytechnic U., et al., 3 ~The Debater’s Guide, Third Edition, p. 4~ The Proposition of Policy: Urging Future Action Modest predictability of the resolution is worth potential substantive tradeoff.Toni M. MASSARO, Professor of Law, University of Florida, 89 ~August, 1989, "Empathy, Legal Storytelling, and the Rule of Law: New Words, Old Wounds?" Michigan Law Review, 87 Mich. L. Rev. 2099, Lexis~ Yet despite their acknowledgment that some ordering and rules are necessary, empathy proponents tend Limiting the discussion to a predictable topic is a pre-requisite to fairness and effective advocacySteinberg and Freeley 8—*David L. Steinberg, a lecturer in Communication Studies at the University of Miami, holds a Master's Degree in Communication from The University of Tennessee and has completed significant post-graduate work in Communication Studies, Education, and Human Resource Development from The Pennsylvania State University and from Florida International University. Austin J. Freeley is a Boston based attorney who focuses on criminal, personal injury and civil rights law February 13, 2008, Argumentation and Debate: Critical Thinking for Reasoned Decision Making, Twelfth Edition, Wadsworth Publishing, pg. 43-45 | 11/11/13 |
111 SA TheoryTournament: Kentucky | Round: 5 | Opponent: Dartmouth | Judge: | 11/11/13 |
111 T - AF is All BranchesTournament: Kentucky | Round: 5 | Opponent: Dartmouth | Judge: DTIC 13 Armed Forces of the United States… and the Coast Guard. In means throughout Allowing aff to spec a subset makes the topic virtually limitless. What is the military? In simple terms, the U.S. Armed Our interp draws the distinction between “one armed force” and “armed forces.” (2) The Navy, the Marine Corps, … as one armed force.’’’ We cite the official source for military terms. Prereq to policy discussion.
| 11/11/13 |
111 T - AF is PeopleTournament: Kentucky | Round: 7 | Opponent: Houston | Judge: Quigley | 11/11/13 |
111 T - Restrict is ProhibitTournament: JMU | Round: 1 | Opponent: Vanderbilt BM | Judge: Woodruff 3. The ordinary definition of the term "restrictions" also does not include | 11/11/13 |
111 T - RestrictionsTournament: Kentucky | Round: 5 | Opponent: Dartmouth | Judge: | 11/11/13 |
222 Ex Post CPTournament: JMU | Round: 1 | Opponent: Vanderbilt BM | Judge: Woodruff CP solves the case. As we have shown, targeted killings may be justified even without declaring an all | 11/11/13 |
222 Reform CPTournament: JMU | Round: 4 | Opponent: GMU BW | Judge: Closing GTMO causes terrorism. Terror goes nuclear and turns the case. | 11/11/13 |
222 Restrictions PICTournament: Kentucky | Round: 5 | Opponent: Dartmouth | Judge: A broader reason for a right to privacy and a corollary to this right is | 11/11/13 |
222 XOTournament: Kentucky | Round: 5 | Opponent: Dartmouth | Judge: Including self-binding mechanisms ensures effective constraints and executive credibility IV. Executive Signaling: Law and Mechanisms¶ We suggest that the executive’s credibility | 11/11/13 |
333 Drone Shift DATournament: JMU | Round: 1 | Opponent: Vanderbilt BM | Judge: Woodruff | 11/11/13 |
333 ExFlex DATournament: Kentucky | Round: 5 | Opponent: Dartmouth | Judge: Liberal legalists, following Madison, describe Congress as the deliberative institution par A requirement of ex post statutory authorization thus seems more plausible than the ex ante Speed is key to solve terror and rogue states This time, President Obama has the Constitution about right. His exercise of war Extinction | 11/11/13 |
333 PTX CIRTournament: Vanderbilt | Round: 1 | Opponent: Wake Forest CrHa | Judge: Edmund Zagorin Will passGreg Sargent 10-30 (Washington Post). "Immigration reform is definitely undead." October 30 2013. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2013/10/30/immigration-reform-is-definitely-undead/ We now have three House Republicans who have signed on to the House Dem comprehensive The plan drains political capital and derails CIRShane, Ohio State law school chair 2011 CIR key to the economy.India Times 4-27 The impact is global nuclear warFreidberg and Schonfeld, 8 —- *Professor of Politics and IR at Princeton’s Woodrow Wilson School, AND senior editor of Commentary and a visiting scholar at the Witherspoon Institute in Princeton (10/21/2008, Aaron and Gabriel, "The Dangers of a Diminished America", Wall Street Journal, http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122455074012352571.html?mod=googlenews_wsj) With the global financial system in serious trouble, is America’s geostrategic dominance likely to | 11/11/13 |
333 PTX Debt CeilingTournament: Kentucky | Round: 5 | Opponent: Dartmouth | Judge: There are numerous press reports Friday that Speaker John Boehner has told some Republican House Blocking presidential initiatives emboldens republicans; Boehner won’t cave It seems that everyone in Washington is talking about it except President Barack Obama: Failure to pass debt ceiling will destroy the U.S. and global economy This is the definition of a deficit, and it illustrates why the government needs Extinction With the global financial system in serious trouble, is America's geostrategic dominance likely to | 11/11/13 |
333 Readiness DATournament: JMU | Round: 4 | Opponent: GMU BW | Judge: The war on terror has led to an increased use of the state secrets¶ Advocates of deference at times also emphasize the collateral ¶ consequences that non-deferential The preservation of today's Pax Americana rests upon both actual military strength and the perception For if America falters, the world is unlikely to be dominated by a single | 11/11/13 |
444 Interpassivity KTournament: Vanderbilt | Round: 5 | Opponent: Wake Forest PePh | Judge: Kristen Porter KInterpassivityThe Affirmative engages in interpassivity, projecting themselves onto those who are not represented in the debate space, but spatially and intelligibly divorced from this academic practice. This interpassivity is a condition of possibility for further genocide.Žižek 98. Slavoj Žižek, The Interpassive Subject, Centre Georges Pompidou, Paris: Traverses, 198, http://www.egs.edu/faculty/slavoj-zizek/articles/the-interpassive-subject/ Is the Western liberal academic’s obsession with the suffering in Bosnia not the outstanding recent Intersubjectivity make us avatars without control of our humyn facultiesjagodzinski 7. jan jagodzinski ~University of Alberta~, Videogame Cybersubjects: Questioning the Myths of Violence and Identification (Implications for Educational Technologies ), 53.1 The Alberta Journal of Educational Research (Spring 2007), 52 There is something quite sinister in all this participatory action that has consequences for educational The impact is mass murderjagodzinski 7. jan jagodzinski ~University of Alberta~, Videogame Cybersubjects: Questioning the Myths of Violence and Identification (Implications for Educational Technologies ), 53.1 The Alberta Journal of Educational Research (Spring 2007), 57-58 No doubt the most spectacular account of violent videogames has been their implication in school The alternative is a withdrawal from the aggressive passivity of the AffirmativeŽižek 5. Slavoj Žižek ~Slovenian philosopher and cultural critic~, The Obscenity of Human Rights: Violence as Symptom, Lacan.com, 2005, http://www.egs.edu/faculty/slavoj-zizek/articles/the-obscenity-of-human-rights-violence-as-symptom/ There is, however, another way in which Balibar’s plea for renouncing violence can | 11/11/13 |
444 Security KTournament: Vanderbilt | Round: 1 | Opponent: Wake Forest CrHa | Judge: Edmund Zagorin The affirmative images of annihilation create a pure war mentality, creating the underlying conditions for warMark Borg, Spring 2003. Graduate of the William Alanson White Institute’s psychoanalytic certification program and continues his candidacy in their organizational dynamics program. "Psychoanalytic Pure War: Interactions with the Post-Apocalyptic Unconscious," Journal for the Psychoanalysis of Culture and Society 8.1, Project Muse. Virilio and Lotringer gave the name "pure war" to the psychological condition that The impact is limitless macro-political violenceBurke 7 – Associate Professor of Politics and International Relations in the University of New South Wales (Anthony, Theory 26 Event, Volume 10, Issue 2, 2007, "Ontologies of War: Violence, Existence and Reason," Project MUSE) This essay develops a theory about the causes of war — and thus aims to The alternative is to reject the aff. Only resistance to security logic can generate genuine political thoughtNeocleous 8 – Mark Neocleous, Prof. of Government @ Brunel, 2008 ~Critique of Security, 185-6~
| 11/11/13 |
444 Weak Onto KTournament: Vanderbilt | Round: 1 | Opponent: Wake Forest CrHa | Judge: Edmund Zagorin Their Portrayal Of The World And Call For Political Action Rests On Unchallenged Strong Ontologies, Forgetting The Indeterminacy That Is The Hallmark Of Modern PoliticsWhite, 2000: Strong are those ontologies that claim to show us "the way the world is The impact of their strong ontology is unending violence to the otherGaonkar 26 Topper 05. Dilip Gaonkar ~Associate Professor of Communication Studies at Northwestern University~ 26 Keith Topper ~Assistant Professor of Communication Studies and Political Science at Northwestern University~, Afterword: Notes on the Bearable Lightness of Being, The Hedgehog Review, Summer 2005, 100 4 White does not conceal the fact that the idea of "finitude" has The alternative is to reject the strong ontological framework of the affirmative. Instead we favor a weak ontology that recognizes our contingency and seeks to restore our agency as ethico-political actors in a complex world. Absent our weak ontological framework, the Affirmative leads to nothing but violence.Howe 06. Louis E. Howe ~University of West Georgia~, Enchantment, Weak ontologies, and Administrative Ethics, 38.4 Administration 26 Society, September 2006, 427-428 In this section, I will further explicate the notion of weak ontology. Although | 11/11/13 |
444 Womyn KTournament: Kentucky | Round: 5 | Opponent: Dartmouth | Judge: This is a gateway issue. You have a duty to reject gendered language. If they win their discourse is acceptable, then you can evaluate the rest of the case. | 11/11/13 |
Filename | Date | Uploaded By | Delete |
---|
Air Force
Amherst
Appalachian State
Arizona State
Army
Augustana
Bard
Baylor
Binghamton
Boston College
Capital
CSU Long Beach
CSU Northridge
CSU Sacramento
CUNY
Cal Berkeley
Cal Lutheran
Cal Poly SLO
Case Western
Central Florida
Central Oklahoma
Chico
Clarion
Columbia
Concordia
Cornell
Dartmouth
Denver
Drexel-Swarthmore
ENMU
East Los Angeles College
Eastern Washington
Emory
Emporia
Fayetteville State
Florida
Florida Int'l
Florida State
Fordham
Fresno State
Fullerton
Gainesville State
George Mason
George Washington
Georgetown
Georgia
Georgia State
Georgia Tech
Gonzaga
Harvard
Houston
Idaho State
Illinois
Illinois State
Indiana
Iowa
Irvine/SFSU
James Madison
John Carroll
Johns Hopkins
Johnson County CC
KCKCC
Kansas
Kansas State
Kentucky
LA City College
Lakeland
Lewis-Clark State College
Liberty
Lindenwood
Los Rios
Louisville
Loyola
Macalester
Marist
Mary Washington
Mercer
Methodist
Miami FL
Miami OH
Michigan
Michigan State
Minnesota
Mission
Missouri State
NYU
Navy
New School
North Texas
Northern Iowa
Northwestern
Notre Dame
Ohio Wesleyan
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pepperdine
Piedmont
Pittsburgh
Portland State
Princeton
Puget Sound
Redlands
Richmond
Rochester
Rutgers
Samford
San Diego State
San Francisco State
Santa Clara
South Florida St Pete
Southern Methodist
Southwestern
Stanford
Texas State
Texas-Austin
Texas-Dallas
Texas-San Antonio
Texas-Tyler
Towson
Trinity
U Chicago
UCLA
UDC-CC
UMKC
UNLV
USC
Utah
Vanderbilt
Vermont
Virginia Tech
Wake Forest
Wash U (St. Louis)
Washburn
Washington
Wayne State
Weber
West Georgia
West Virginia
Western Connecticut
Whitman
Wichita State
Wisconsin Oshkosh
Wyoming