Tournament: JV Nats | Round: 2 | Opponent: NYU DZ | Judge: Armand Revelins
Current discussions on drone policy are limited to the “technical sphere” of the disposition matrix as opposed to being in a public sphere open to public deliberation – This secrecy from public deliberation is what allows for the targeted attacks on Muslim populations or any who are deemed a threat – Opening the space for deliberation on drones is key
Hayes 13 Heather Ashley Hayes, Whitman College, “Don’t Fear the Reaper: The Disturbing Case of How Drones Reconfigure Technologies of Deliberation,” Forthcoming in Disturbing Argument: Selected Papers of the 18th Biennial Conference on Argumentation, edited by Catherine Palczewski, pages to be determined. New York: Taylor and Francis Group, 2013. https://www.academia.edu/5957129/Dont_Fear_the_Reaper_The_Distrubing_Case_of_How_Drone_Reconfigure_Technologies_of_Deliberation da 2-8-14cd

Arguing Drones: Reconfigured Technologies...global war on terror. 

Our view from below is key to examining the network connections of the state - The institution of the state is radically incompatible with thinking; operating from within a framework of political organization which seeks to maximize and rationalize the imperatives of power.  
Beistegui 07 (Miguel de Beistegui, Professor of Philosophy University of Warwick, Coventry.  Questioning Politics, or Beyond Power.  European Journal of Political Theory 2007; 6; 87.  Sage Publications)

Let me now turn to the ... the logic of the will-to-power.

Tournament: Georgia State University | Round: 2 | Opponent: MSU KN | Judge: Eric Short
These are the only cards we read in the 2ac:

And yet, we continue to strive for zero-death at the expense of life itself.
Baudrillard 1993 (Jean, The Transparency of Evil, Pages 81-82)
Terrorism in all its forms is the transpolitical ... managing things. (By a marvellous irony the USSR has even put itself forward as mediator between the West and the Satan of Teheran, having defended western values for five years in Afghanistan without anyone quite realizing it.)

Professor Natalie Bormann explains- that our very discussions about drone policy are already pre-figured by the excessive logic of drone.
Bormann 2006 (Natalie Bormann Visiting Assistant Professor The Global Security Program Watson Institute, ISA Conference in San Diego, March 22-25, 2006 Panel on ‘Reading Outer Space’)

What should be clear by now is that material ... disappear one by one’.

Tournament: Georgia State University | Round: 4 | Opponent: Clarion BC | Judge: Andy Montee
Same as round 2 and and#39;2ac evidence all roundsand#39;

Tournament: Georgia State University | Round: 6 | Opponent: Wake Forest SS | Judge: Marie Eszenyi
same as round2. please see '2ac evidence all rounds'

Tournament: Georgia State University | Round: 8 | Opponent: Michigan State BS | Judge: Scott Harris
No freedom within this world of debate set up by the negatives interpretation, only addiction – follow us on our journey, refuse to be traveled by this program – a program which only serves to replace the very political reality they so desperately ask you to cling to

Sans and Virilio 2004 (Paul, ‘.DIALOGUES./ the Game of Love and Chance: A Discussion with Paul Virilio. Interview with Jérôme Sans’. Electronic document. Available online: http://www.watsoninstitute.org/infopeace/vy2k/sans.cfm) 

JÉRÔME SANS: Video games have an incredibly ... and nothing more.

Tournament: James Madison | Round: 2 | Opponent: Vanderbilt SW | Judge: Joe Autry
Their interp doesn’t solve their impacts
Galloway 2010
(Ryan, Head Coach at Samford University and overall amazing person. “The Importance of Being Relevant” http://www.cedadebate.org/forum/index.php?topic=925.0)jap

How relevant are …this year (except potentially at the margin as a disad and a counterplan).

The institution of the state is radically incompatible with thinking; operating from within a framework of political organization which seeks to maximize and rationalize the imperatives of power.  Closed off from any and all ability to hold itself in question – the political in modernity becomes essentially totalitarian – striving for total domination and control.  
Beistegui 2007 (Miguel de Beistegui, Professor of Philosophy University of Warwick, Coventry.  Questioning Politics, or Beyond Power.  European Journal of Political Theory 2007; 6; 87.  Sage Publications)
Let me now turn to the more …. the will-to-power.

Too predictable ubscures or makes blind spot of all the other things that could happen- creates endless cycle of violence
  Fernando ’09 Jeremy, super nice, Jean Baudrillard Fellow at the European Graduate School and Fellow of Tembusu College at The National University of Singapore. He received his MA in Media Philosophy from the European Graduate School (2006) and an MA in English Literature from Nanyang Technological University (2008). “Reading blindly: Literature, Otherness, and the Possibility of an Ethical Reading”.
There is no doubt that there…, exchangeable. 

Their framework and interpretation of what a “topical version of the affirmative” is makes our affirmation impossible for several reasons
Stenstad 2006 (Gail, professor in the Department of Philosophy and Humanities at East Tennessee State University, associate editor of Heidegger Studies, and a member of the board of directors of the International Association for Environmental Philosophy.  “Transformations Thinking After Heidegger” University of Wisconsin Press. Page(s) 186-187)

If we can succeed to ….
information or entertainment.

SS debate creates a distance from the world that reproduces a bougeoise class interest and only serves to valorize the moral values of liberalism and deliberative democracy –answers lesson plan
Greene, R., and Hicks, D. (2006) Lost Convictions. Cultural Studies, 19:1, 100-126

It is the distance from …. deliberative democracy.

Debate is unfair and that‘s good because it forces adaptation, creativity and better debate, leading to ultimately superior training for life.
Branson 2007 (Josh, edebate, http://www.ndtceda.com/pipermail/edebate/2007-May/071122.html,)
People‘s obsession with ?…. certainly cry foul a lot. Maybe too much.

Tournament: James Madison | Round: 3 | Opponent: JMU BM | Judge: Terrell Taylor
And yet, we continue to strive for zero-death at the expense of life itself.
Baudrillard 1993 (Jean, The Transparency of Evil, Pages 81-82)
Terrorism in all its forms..  realizing it.)

Tournament: James Madison | Round: 3 | Opponent: JMU BM | Judge: Terrell Taylor
Solvency deficit- The rhetorical form, situation, and primacy of the 1AC itself constructs a contingent space of debate that can only be activated in service of streamlining our justifications for drone strikes and the perpetual (re)generation of technological warfare.
Hayes 2013 (Heather Ashley Hayes, Asst Prof of Rhetoric, Whitman College.  “Violent Subjects: A Rhetorical Cartography of Bodies, Spaces, and Technologies in the Global War on Terror.”  A Dissertation SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Heather Ashley Hayes IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Ronald Walter Greene, Adviser, April 2013)

As Karen DeYoung describes, “The ‘playbook... term and beyond with regard to unmanned aerial

Tournament: University of Kentucky | Round: 1 | Opponent: Kentucky GV | Judge: Gus Eyzaguire
And yet, we continue to strive for zero-death at the expense of life itself.
Baudrillard 1993 (Jean, The Transparency of Evil, Pages 81-82)
Terrorism in all its forms is the transpolitical ... managing things. (By a marvellous irony the USSR has even put itself forward as mediator between the West and the Satan of Teheran, having defended western values for five years in Afghanistan without anyone quite realizing it.)

Professor Natalie Bormann explains- that our very discussions about drone policy are already pre-figured by the excessive logic of drone.
Bormann 2006 (Natalie Bormann Visiting Assistant Professor The Global Security Program Watson Institute, ISA Conference in San Diego, March 22-25, 2006 Panel on ‘Reading Outer Space’)

What should be clear by now is that material ... disappear one by one’.

Tournament: University of Kentucky | Round: 3 | Opponent: James Madison CP | Judge: Cole Bender
And yet, we continue to strive for zero-death at the expense of life itself.
Baudrillard 1993 (Jean, The Transparency of Evil, Pages 81-82)
Terrorism in all its forms is the transpolitical ... managing things. (By a marvellous irony the USSR has even put itself forward as mediator between the West and the Satan of Teheran, having defended western values for five years in Afghanistan without anyone quite realizing it.)

Tournament: University of Kentucky | Round: 1 | Opponent: Kentucky GV | Judge: Gus Eyzaguire
We relate to the resolution through resolved, as Heidegger understood it; we remain open to transformation of drones, without trying to control it, for different ways of knowing. This means rather than enact a plan, we should analyze the rhetoric that goes into drones stance.Barbara Dalle Pezze, PhD in Philosophy by the University of Hong.  Heidegger on Gelassenheit, ISSN 1393-614X, Minerva - An Internet Journal of Philosophy 10(2006): 94-
122“It could appear, from what we have ….
,” the resolve torelease oneself to that-which-regions, to remain open towards the openness itself.

The institution of the state is radically incompatible with thinking; operating from within a framework of political organization which seeks to maximize and rationalize the imperatives of power.  Closed off from any and all ability to hold itself in question – the political in modernity becomes essentially totalitarian – striving for total domination and control.  
Beistegui 2007 (Miguel de Beistegui, Professor of Philosophy University of Warwick, Coventry.  Questioning Politics, or Beyond Power.  European Journal of Political Theory 2007; 6; 87.  Sage Publications)
Let me now turn to the more …. the will-to-power.

Their framework and interpretation of what a “topical version of the affirmative” is makes our affirmation impossible for several reasons
Stenstad 2006 (Gail, professor in the Department of Philosophy and Humanities at East Tennessee State University, associate editor of Heidegger Studies, and a member of the board of directors of the International Association for Environmental Philosophy.  “Transformations Thinking After Heidegger” University of Wisconsin Press. Page(s) 186-187)

If we can succeed to ….
information or entertainment.

SS debate creates a distance from the world that reproduces a bougeoise class interest and only serves to valorize the moral values of liberalism and deliberative democracy –answers lesson plan
Greene, R., and Hicks, D. (2006) Lost Convictions. Cultural Studies, 19:1, 100-126

It is the distance from …. deliberative democracy.

Tournament: University of Kentucky | Round: 3 | Opponent: James Madison CP | Judge: Cole Bender
F/W

We relate to the resolution through resolved, as Heidegger understood it; we remain open to transformation of drones, without trying to control it, for different ways of knowing. This means rather than enact a plan, we should analyze the rhetoric that goes into drones stance.Barbara Dalle Pezze, PhD in Philosophy by the University of Hong.  Heidegger on Gelassenheit, ISSN 1393-614X, Minerva - An Internet Journal of Philosophy 10(2006): 94-
122“It could appear, from what we have ….
,” the resolve torelease oneself to that-which-regions, to remain open towards the openness itself.

Their interp doesn’t solve their impacts
Galloway 2010
(Ryan, Head Coach at Samford University and overall amazing person. “The Importance of Being Relevant” http://www.cedadebate.org/forum/index.php?topic=925.0)jap

How relevant are …this year (except potentially at the margin as a disad and a counterplan).

The institution of the state is radically incompatible with thinking; operating from within a framework of political organization which seeks to maximize and rationalize the imperatives of power.  Closed off from any and all ability to hold itself in question – the political in modernity becomes essentially totalitarian – striving for total domination and control.  
Beistegui 2007 (Miguel de Beistegui, Professor of Philosophy University of Warwick, Coventry.  Questioning Politics, or Beyond Power.  European Journal of Political Theory 2007; 6; 87.  Sage Publications)
Let me now turn to the more …. the will-to-power.

Too predictable ubscures or makes blind spot of all the other things that could happen- creates endless cycle of violence
  Fernando ’09 Jeremy, super nice, Jean Baudrillard Fellow at the European Graduate School and Fellow of Tembusu College at The National University of Singapore. He received his MA in Media Philosophy from the European Graduate School (2006) and an MA in English Literature from Nanyang Technological University (2008). “Reading blindly: Literature, Otherness, and the Possibility of an Ethical Reading”.
There is no doubt that there…, exchangeable. 

Their framework and interpretation of what a “topical version of the affirmative” is makes our affirmation impossible for several reasons
Stenstad 2006 (Gail, professor in the Department of Philosophy and Humanities at East Tennessee State University, associate editor of Heidegger Studies, and a member of the board of directors of the International Association for Environmental Philosophy.  “Transformations Thinking After Heidegger” University of Wisconsin Press. Page(s) 186-187)

If we can succeed to ….
information or entertainment.

SS debate creates a distance from the world that reproduces a bougeoise class interest and only serves to valorize the moral values of liberalism and deliberative democracy –answers lesson plan
Greene, R., and Hicks, D. (2006) Lost Convictions. Cultural Studies, 19:1, 100-126

It is the distance from …. deliberative democracy.

Debate is unfair and that‘s good because it forces adaptation, creativity and better debate, leading to ultimately superior training for life.
Branson 2007 (Josh, edebate, http://www.ndtceda.com/pipermail/edebate/2007-May/071122.html,)
People‘s obsession with ?…. certainly cry foul a lot. Maybe too much.